Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/225485500
CITATIONS READS
25 2,973
2 authors, including:
Andrea Cocucci
National University of Cordoba, Argentina
177 PUBLICATIONS 4,200 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Andrea Cocucci on 14 February 2019.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
123
E. Glinos, A. A. Cocucci
123
Pollination biology of Canna indica (Cannaceae)
fruit are sired in a single or few visits (see Harder and For the purpose of comparisons of the style morphology
Johnson 2008). Consequently, our working hypothesis was among Canna and representatives of closely related familes,
that, as in these examples, the two stigma-like structures of additional fresh styles of Marantaceae [Calathea cylindrica
Canna have receptive or adhesive functions and that they (Roscoe) K. Schum. Ubatuba, Brazil; Maranta arundinacea
are derived from a single stigma that previously had both L. cultivated in Córdoba, Argentina], Strelitziaceae (Strel-
functions. In addition, we expected that the mechanism of itzia reginae Aiton, cultivated in Córdoba, Argentina), and
pollen transference would be highly effective at the flower Lowiaceae [Orchidantha maxillarioides (Ridl.) K. Schum.,
level, i.e., that pollen limitation would affect fruit set rather cultivated in the Botanical Gardens of Darmstadt, Germany]
than seed set. were examined under the stereomicroscope.
Considering the above expectation, we pursued this
study to obtain a better functional explanation of the
flowers of Canna by addressing the following questions: Methods
Do lateral and apical parts of the stigma have different
functions? Have both parts the same chemical nature and Disposition of the glandular parts of the stigma
histological characteristics? Which species visit and polli- and anatomy of the style
nate the flowers? How is pollen deposited on the pollina-
tor’s body and how is pollen retrieved by the stigma? Is this Right- or left-handedness, i.e., with the lateral part of the
species pollen-limited? What is the relation between fruit stigma positioned at the right or left side of the style, was
set and seed set in a scenario of pollen limitation? In recorded in 114 flowers. For anatomical study, styles were
addition, we traced morphological analogues of the lateral excised, fixed in a 1:1 glutaraldehyde-phosphate buffer pH
stigmatic parts, i.e., structures that are equivalent in ana- 7 solution, and stored at 5°C for 48 h, then dehydrated in
tomical construction and position on the style, and their an ethanol series and embedded in paraffin (Johansen
function among representatives of the Zingiberales with the 1940). Longitudinal and cross sections, 8 lm thick, were
expectation that this would reveal ancestral functional made with a Leitz 1512 rotary microtome and stained with
relationships in Canna. brilliant cresyl blue (Merck). The observations were carried
out using a Leica DM LB light microscope.
Study species
Identification of the receptive part of the style
Cannaceae (Zingiberales) are represented by a single genus
and 10 species probably native to the New World, and are To identify the receptive area, the apical and lateral parts of
distributed in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide the stigma of virgin flowers were manually saturated with
(Dahlgren et al. 1985; Maas and Maas 1988). Canna indica cross pollen. Pollen tubes were allowed to grow for 2 days
L. is distributed from Mexico to South America and is nat- until the style started to shrivel. Then styles were cut and
uralized in North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia. It fixed in a 70% ethanol solution for at least 6 h and cleared
grows in temperate regions of subtropical Argentina (Novara with 5% NaOH at 60°C for 24 h. After rinsing with water,
2001). Observations and collection of samples were carried styles were mounted on slides with 50% glycerin and 0.1%
out in three natural populations of Canna indica located in aniline blue in PO4HK 0.1 M buffer and, after 3 h, gently
Cuesta Blanca 31°280 59.100 S, 64°340 33.200 W; Costa Azul squashed and observed with a Leica DM LB epifluores-
31°240 46.800 S, 64°260 51.400 W; and Agua de Oro 31°040 0400 S, cence microscope (Kearns and Inouye 1993).
34°180 1600 W, Córdoba, Argentina. Additional morphologi-
cal and anatomical observations were made in ‘‘Canna Chemical nature of the stigmatic secretion
indica’’ garden hybrids.
Petals are basally connate and fused with the stamen and Fresh flower styles were smoothly pressed onto slides to
staminodes (in this species there are three) into a obtain an imprint of the secretions of the two parts of the
50–60 mm long tube with three entries that clearly separate stigma. The imprint was embedded in 0.01% ruthenium red
spaces accessible to pollinators and that accumulate nectar and left for a few minutes to reveal mucilages (Gerlach
from septal nectaries (Fig. 1d; see also Rao and Donde 1984). The same procedure was performed with Sudan IV
1955; Pai 1963; Kunze 1984). When the flowers open, the to reveal lipids (Gerlach 1984). To detect total carbohy-
stamen turns to the back and the style twists axially, in such drates, the imprints were treated with Schiff’s reagent
a way that the lateral stigmatic part is placed ventrally and (Merck) according to Jensen (1962). The preparations
the pollen presenter laterally to the flower inside. In addi- obtained were then observed using a Leica DM LB light
tion, the tip of the style curves somewhat to the side during microscope and a Leica MS 5 stereomicroscope. Glucose
anthesis (Fig. 1f). was detected by embedding a GlucostixÒ strip for a few
123
E. Glinos, A. A. Cocucci
seconds with the secretion (Kearns and Inouye 1993). All lengths of hummingbird visitors were measured from
these tests were made on five flowers of three floral stages: specimens of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales
buds with closed thecae, buds with pollen deposited on the (Buenos Aires).
presenter, and open flowers.
In the Agua de Oro population, 5–10 flowers per treatment Disposition of the glandular parts of the stigma
were used to evaluate whether flowers depend on pollina- and anatomy of the style
tors for the production of fruits and to determine repro-
ductive efficiency in this population. Three pollination Of the 114 flowers inspected, 97% presented the lateral part
treatments were made: autonomous self-pollination, hand of the stigma on the left side of the style. In this position,
cross-pollination, and open pollination. In the autonomous the pollen presenter is placed at the right side of the
self-pollination treatment, flowers were bagged before secretory part (Fig. 2). Longitudinal and cross sections of
opening to isolate them from pollinators. In the hand cross- C. indica and hybrid flowers showed the stylar canal run-
pollination treatment, the stigmas of virgin flowers were ning throughout the style from the ovary to the apical part
saturated with pollen from other plants and then bagged. of the stigma (Fig. 3). The epidermal cells that internally
Finally, another set of flowers was exposed to open polli- cover this canal are flat and have a reduced lumen, a thin
nation. Fruit set (proportion of fruits/flowers treated 9 100) cuticle, and a denser cytoplasm than the rest of the stylar
and the number of seeds per fruit in each treatment were cells (Fig. 4a). These cells are presumably responsible for
recorded. The frequency of flowers setting and not setting the secretion of the dense material within the stylar canal
fruits was tested between treatments with a v2 homogeneity (Fig. 4a).
test. The mean number of seeds per capsule was compared The lateral and the apical parts of the stigma are
between free- and cross-pollination treatments with a one- similar in having abundant, long (ca. 0.1 mm), noncapi-
way analysis of variance. A reproductive efficiency index tate, unicellular trichomes that are swollen at the base.
was calculated according to Ruiz and Arroyo (1978) as (Po/ The trichome cytoplasm is rich in stroma, organelles, and
Pc), where Po and Pc are the proportions of seeds or fruits small to medium vacuoles (Fig. 4b, c). The apical and
set under open and cross-pollination, respectively. If this lateral parts differ in the distribution of the trichomes,
value is 1 there is no pollen limitation and therefore pollen with trichomes distributed along two ridges in the apical
transfer by vectors is sufficient. Additionally, 30 flowers part or along a single ridge on the lateral part. The two
were bagged to evaluate if pollen fell spontaneously when it apical ridges correspond to the outer rim of the stylar
was not removed by pollinators. The presence of pollen on canal (Fig. 3a).
the style presenter was recorded until the flowers shrivelled.
Identification of the receptive part of the style
Floral visitors
Although pollen grains germinated on both parts of the
Observations were made in the three natural populations stigma, only pollen tubes from pollen deposited on the
during a total of 15 days in January, February, and March stigma’s apical part developed and reached the stylar canal
of 2004 and 2007. A total of 109 h of observations from (Fig. 4d–f).
hidden posts were dedicated to identifying the animals
arriving at the flowers. During this time, posts of obser- Chemical nature of the stigmatic secretion
vations were changed approximately every 2 h. Of the total
observation time, 34 h were dedicated to determining vis- The staining of both parts of the stigma was positive for
itation frequency. To this end the number of insect and carbohydrates (Schiff’s reagent) and mucilage (ruthenium
hummingbird visits per inflorescence, as well as the visi- red). The tests for lipids and glucose were negative. Iden-
tors’ behavior, was recorded at 40 min intervals. The vis- tical results were obtained for all three floral stages.
itation rate was calculated as the number of visits/number
of inflorescences/hour of observation. Photographs and Breeding system and pollen attachment on the style
videos of the pollination process were also taken to study
the pollination mechanism. In addition, the mechanical None of the flowers excluded from pollinators developed
interplay between flowers and pollinators was studied by fruits. Fruit set under free pollination and hand-crossed
simulating visits using plastic models and embalmed pollination treatments was 20 and 86%, respectively, with
hummingbirds of the pollinating species. Exposed culmen the frequency of flowers setting and not setting fruits
123
Pollination biology of Canna indica (Cannaceae)
significantly different between treatments (v2 = 5.18; spontaneously and must be removed by visitors for
df = 1; p = 0.02). Through fruit set, the reproductive pollination.
efficiency index value obtained was 0.23, and through seed
set it was 0.84. No significant differences were found Floral visitors
between open pollination and hand cross-pollination in the
number of seeds produced per fruit (ANOVA; F = 0.24; Visits of two hummingbird species, Chlorostilbon aureo-
df = 1; p = 0.63). ventris (bill length: 16.64 ± 1.17 mm; n = 4) and Helio-
In the flowers bagged to evaluate pollen attachment to master furcifer (bill length: 27.86 ± 2.12 mm; n = 9),
the secondary pollen presenter, pollen remained on the were recorded. Visitation rate of Chlorostilbon aureoven-
style until flowers shrivelled even when subjected to the tris was higher than that of Heliomaster furcifer in two of
effect of wind and rain. This means that pollen does not fall the three populations studied (Table 1). Chlorostilbon
123
E. Glinos, A. A. Cocucci
Fig. 4 Canna indica. a–c Detail of the stylar canal and trichomes of organelles, and small to medium vacuoles. d–f Pollen tube growth
the apical and lateral stigmatic parts. a Cross section of stylar canal of hand-pollinated styles, viewed with fluorescence microscopy after
(arrow indicates secretion). The epidermal secretory cells that line the clearing styles and staining with aniline blue. d View of the apical and
canal are flat with a reduced lumen and dense cytoplasm. b, lateral parts of the style. Pollen tubes germinate in both parts but
c Longitudinal sections of the style. b Trichomes of apical part. reach the stylar canal only via the apical part. e Detail of the apical
c Trichomes of lateral part. Trichomes of both areas are unicellular part. f Detail of the lateral part. lp Lateral part, ap apical part, pt
and have a swollen base. Their cytoplasm is rich in stroma, pollen tubes. Scale bars a, b 40 lm, c 20 lm, d 200 lm, e, f 100 lm
Table 1 Percentage of
Minutes of Chlorostilbon aureoventris Heliomaster furcifer
hummingbird visits (%) and
observation
visitation rate (visits/ Percentage Visitation Percentage Visitation
inflorescence/hour) in three of visits rate (v/inf/h) of visits rate (v/inf/h)
natural populations of Canna
indica Cuesta Blanca 600 99.27 0.024 0.73 0.00018
Costa Azul 840 78.24 0.072 21.76 0.018
Agua de Oro 568 12.8 0.006 87.2 0.036
Totals 2,008 64.44 36.3
aureoventris hummingbirds showed two distinct behaviors hummingbirds showed that their bills get tightly encased in
when taking nectar: (1) insertion of the bill into the flower the floral tube. Thus, a straight backward thrust is required
tube, and (2) nectar uptake through pre-existing perfora- for the bird to get out of the flower tube. In the videos it is
tions. These perforations were made by the carpenter bee clearly evident that the hummingbirds strike a backward
Xylocopa ordinaria. In neither case did the hummingbirds wing beat when about to extract their bill from the flower
of this species make contact with the fertile parts of the tube. It is during this backward flight that the hummingbird
flowers. touches the style. Pollen is deposited dorsally on the bill
Only Heliomaster furcifer was seen carrying pollen of between the apical third and the apical half of the exposed
Canna indica in the three study populations. The photo- culmen (Fig. 5b). Though the precise, very brief moment
graphs and videos enabled us to evaluate some critical of pollen deposition on the stigma could not be captured, it
aspects of the pollination mechanism. Hummingbirds of is clear from the position of the style, protruding dorsally
this species do not make contact with the stigma and pollen and laterally, that the hummingbirds strike the style with
when entering the flowers or while taking nectar (Fig. 5a). the bill when rearing out of the flower and touch in suc-
The simulations made with plastic models and embalmed cession first the lateral part of the stigma and then the
123
Pollination biology of Canna indica (Cannaceae)
Discussion
123
E. Glinos, A. A. Cocucci
style could be called viscidium, as Pedersen and Johansen Pollen adherence to the style, pollen load loss,
(2004) proposed for an anatomically equivalent structure of and pollen limitation
Orchidantha. It remains to be tested if the presence of a
viscidium is a general feature of Canna. Recently, Ciciarelli It has been suggested that the presentation of the entire
(2007) recognized both the apical and the lateral part as pollen load on the gynoecium increases the risk of pre-
stigmatic zones in Canna ascendens, but this aspect was not mature loss of male function by exposing unprotected
evaluated in detail. pollen to unfavorable environmental influences, such as
The presence of accessory sticky substances from ultraviolet radiation, dehydration, and removal during
flower tissues other than the tapetum becomes important nonpollinating visits (Howell et al. 1993). One of the most
in circumstances in which pollen has to adhere to smooth common ways of achieving pollen adherence to the pre-
surfaces and pollenkitt is not sufficient to fulfill the senter is its entrapment within a brush-like structure where
adhesive function (Vogel 2002; Moyano et al. 2003). The trichomes are involved in the adhesion, presentation, and
differentiation of sterile areas of the stigma that produce staggered pollen release (Howell et al. 1993). In Canna,
accessory pollen adhesives is well known in Apocynaceae pollenkitt appears to be sufficiently effective for pollen
and Orchidaceae (Endress 1994). In Canna the need to cohesion, for adherence to the pollen presenter (pollen
attach a few relatively large pollen grains (68 lm, remains on the style presenter of visitor-excluded flowers
according to Zona 2001) on the smooth culmen of a even after rain and wind) and pollen delivery is not
bird suggests that accessory pollen adhesive could be staggered.
advantageous. Bumblebees are apparently an important factor affecting
reproductive success in Canna indica because they both
Pollinator dependence, visitation rates, and pollination steal nectar, reducing the reward available to legitimate
mechanism visitors, and favor pollen loss by rubbing the presenter and
not the stigma with their hind legs. We detected pollen
In at least one natural Canna indica population studied limitation through fruit set but not through seed set. The
here, plants depend on pollinators for the production of former is presumably a result of the low visitation rate of
fruits. Of two recorded hummingbird visitor species in the pollinating hummingbird and of pollen loss caused by
three populations, pollinators belonged always to one long- illegitimate visitors. However, when pollination does take
billed species. Though the short-billed hummingbirds may place, pollination efficiency of one or a few visits is
be locally more frequent visitors than long-billed ones, they actually high. If a limited lifespan of pollen exposed out-
failed to make contact with the fertile parts of the flower side the anther is assumed and considering that the visita-
because they access the nectar either from the outside tion rate of pollinators is very low, the importance of an
through holes made by bees or, when accessing from the effective pollination mechanism that ensures the transfer of
inside, move considerably below the stigma and pollen pollen to other flowers is evident.
presenter. The observation of hummingbirds as pollinators
agrees with records from another species of Canna (Stiles Comparative functional morphology
and Freeman 1993). This, however, is apparently the first
study in which the pollinator behavior and visitation rate Within Zingiberales, the only families in addition to
are recorded for a species of Canna. Long-billed hum- Cannaceae that have the apical part of the style divided into
mingbirds carry pollen somewhat laterally on the exposed stigma and viscidium are Lowiaceae and Marantaceae. The
culmen. Pollen deposition occurs, as far as can be inter- tissues involved in the secretion of adhesive substances in
preted from photograph sequences, very swiftly when the Lowiaceae are also unicellular glandular trichomes such as
hummingbirds leave the flowers touching in a sequence the those observed in Canna (Pedersen and Johansen 2004),
viscidium and then the pollen clump on the pollen pre- while in Marantaceae they are polygonal cells (Pischtschan
senter. The bending of the style tip towards the center of and Classen-Bockhoff 2010). In Orchidantha (Lowiaceae),
the flower over the rearing trajectory of the hummingbird the viscidium is located on the ventral part of the trilobate
apparently promotes cross-pollination. One-sided deposi- stigma (Pedersen and Johansen 2004), while in Maranta-
tion of pollen on the beak of the hummingbirds and style ceae, it is placed on an abaxial ridge between the stigma
bending from one side to the center of the flower implies and the pollen presenter (Kennedy 1978; Classen-Bockhoff
that pollen transfer takes place by utilizing one side of the 1991; Locatelli et al. 2004; Classen-Bockhoff and Heller
hummingbird. This probably explains why nearly all 2008; Pischtschan and Classen-Bockhoff 2008, 2010; Ley
flowers are left-handed. A right-handed flower would have and Classen-Bockhoff 2009).
no chance of delivering pollen to other flowers or of A comparative analysis of the style structure of the
receiving pollen from them. flowers of Strelitziaceae, Lowiaceae, Cannaceae, and
123
Pollination biology of Canna indica (Cannaceae)
123
E. Glinos, A. A. Cocucci
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Bruce Kirchoff and A. P. Wiemer Kress WJ (1990) The phylogeny and classification of the Zingibe-
for their suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript, and Prof. rales. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 77:698–721
Dr. Stefan Schneckenburger (Darmstadt) for making fresh flowers of Kress WJ, Specht CD (2006) The evolutionary and biogeographic
Orchidantha maxillarioides accessible for study. Embalmed hum- origin and diversification of the tropical monocot order Zing-
mingbirds were kindly provided by the Zoology Museum of the iberales. Aliso 22:619–630
National University of Córdoba. We also thank the Biology Doctorate Kress WJ, Prince LM, Hahn WJ, Zimmer EA (2001) Unraveling the
Program, University of Córdoba. E. Glinos holds a fellowship and A. evolutionary radiation of the families of the Zingiberales using
A. Cocucci is a researcher in Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones morphological and molecular evidence. Syst Biol 50:926–944
Cientı́ficas y Técnicas (Argentina). Financial support was provided by Kronestedt E, Walles B (1986) Anatomy of the Strelitzia reginae
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı́ficas y Técnicas (PIP flower (Strelitziaceae). Nord J Bot 6:307–320
5174). We are grateful to Joss Heywood for checking English Kunze H (1984) Comparative studies of the flower in Cannaceae and
grammar and style. Marantaceae. Flora 175:301–318
Ley AC, Classen-Bockhoff R (2009) Pollination syndromes in
African Marantaceae. Ann Bot 104:41–56
Locatelli E, Machado IC, Medeiros P (2004) Saranthe klotzschiana
References
(Koer.) Eichl. (Marantaceae) e seu mecanismo explosivo de
polinização. Revista Brasil Bot 27:757–765
Bouché PC (1833) Mitteilung vieljähriger Beobachtungen über die Maas PJM, Maas H (1988) Cannaceae. In: Harling G, Anderson L
Gattung Canna. Linnaea 8:141–168 (eds) Flora of Ecuador, vol 32. Swedish Research Council,
Box MS, Rudall PJ (2006) Floral structure and ontogeny in Globba Stockholm, pp 1–9
(Zingiberaceae). Pl Syst Evol 258:107–122 Machado IC, Lopes AV (2000) Souroubea guianensis Aubl.: quest for
Ciciarelli MM (2007) Canna ascendens (Cannaceae), una nueva its legitimate pollinator and the first record of tapetal oil in the
especie de la provincia de Buenos Aires y comentarios sobre Marcgraviaceae. Ann Bot 85:705–711
otras especies argentinas de este género. Darwiniana Moyano F, Cocucci AA, Sérsic A (2003) Accessory pollen adhesive
45(2):188–200 from glandular trichomes on the anthers of Leonurus sibiricus
Classen-Bockhoff R (1991) Untersuchungen zur Konstruktion des (Lamiaceae). Pl Biol 5:411–418
Bestäubungsapparates von Thalia geniculata (Marantaceae). Bot Novara LJ (2001) Cannaceae. Flora fanerogámica argentina, vol 76.
Acta 104:183–193 Proflora, Córdoba
Classen-Bockhoff R, Heller A (2008) Floral synorganization and Pai RM (1963) The floral anatomy of Canna indica L.Bull Bot Soc
secondary pollen presentation in four Marantaceae from Costa Coll Sci Nagpur 4(2):45–53
Rica. Int J Plant Sci 169:745–760 Pedersen LB, Johansen B (2004) Anatomy of the unusual stigma in
Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF (1985) The families of the Orchidantha (Lowiaceae). Am J Bot 91:299–305
monocotyledons. Structure evolution and taxonomy. Springer, Pischtschan E, Classen-Bockhoff R (2008) Setting-up tension in the
Berlin style of Marantaceae. Plant Biol 10:441–450
Delpino F (1873) Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno Pischtschan E, Classen-Bockhoff R (2010) Anatomic insights into the
vegetale II: 2. Atti Soc Ital Sci Nat Milano 16:151–349 thigmonastic style tissue in Marantaceae. Plant Syst Evol
Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical 286:91–102
flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Rao VS, Donde N (1955) The floral anatomy of Canna flaccida.
Gerlach D (1984) Botanische Mikrotechnik. G.Thieme Verlag, New J Univ Bombay 24(3):1–10
York Ruiz TZ, Arroyo MTK (1978) Plant reproductive ecology of a
Harder LD, Johnson SD (2008) Function and evolution of aggregated secondary deciduous forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 19:221–230
pollen in angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci 169:59–78 Sakai S, Inoue T (1999) A new pollination system: dung-beetle
Howell GJ, Slater AT, Knox RB (1993) Secondary pollen presenta- pollination discovered in Orchidantha inouei (Lowiaceae, Zing-
tion in angiosperms and its biological significance. Aust J Bot iberales) in Sarawak, Malaysia. Am J Bot 86:56–61
41:417–438 Schumann K (1888) Einige Bemerkungen zur Morphologie der
Jensen WA (1962) Botanical histochemistry principles and practice. Cannablüthe. Ber Deutsch Bot Ges 6:55–66
WH Freeman, San Francisco Stiles FG, Freeman CE (1993) Patterns in floral nectar characteristics
Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New York of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica. Biotropica
Johansen LB (2005) Phylogeny of Orchidantha (Lowiaceae) and the 25:191–205
Zingiberales based on six DNA regions. Syst Bot 30:106–117 Vogel S (2002) Extra-tapetal pollen adhesives: where they occur and
Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, Stevens PF, Donoghue MJ how they function. Flowers: diversity, development and evolu-
(2008) Plant systematics. A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer, tion. In: Schönenberger J, Balthazar MV, Matthews M (eds)
Sunderland Proceedings of the conference ‘‘Flowers, diversity, development
Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. and evolution,’’ 5–7 July 2002, Zürich (abstract volume)
University Press of Colorado, Colorado Westerkamp C, Weber A (1999) Keel flowers of Polygalaceae and
Kennedy H (1978) Systematics and pollination of the ‘‘closed- Fabaceae: a functional comparison. Bot J Linn Soc 129:207–221
flowered’’ species of Calathea (Marantaceae). Univ California Winnel S, Newman H, Kirchoff B (1992) Ovary structure in the
Pub Bot 71:1–90 Costaceae (Zingiberales). Int J Plant Sci 153:471–487
Kirchoff BK (1983a) Allometric growth of the flowers in five genera Yeo PF (1993) Secondary pollen presentation: form, function and
of the Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Bot Gaz evolution, Springer, Vienna
144:110–118 Zona S (2001) Starchy pollen in commelinoid monocots. Ann Bot
Kirchoff BK (1983b) Floral organogenesis in five genera of the 87:109–116
Marantaceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Am J Bot 70:508–523
Kränzlin F (1912) Cannaceae. In: Engler A (ed) Das Pflanzenreich IV,
vol 47. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–77
123