Day 0

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Negative
Positive
(50%) Leaf (75%) Leaf (100%) Leaf Control
Control
extract extract extract (Distilled
(Levamisole)
water)
A 8 4 7 5 12
Replicate 1 B 6 8 8 6 7
C 9 6 7 4 6
A 8 5 9 1 8
Replicate 2 B 4 7 6 5 9
C 6 7 6 7 5
A 5 9 3 4 11
Replicate 3 B 9 5 5 2 9
C 11 6 6 3 8
Mean Average 7.33333333333 6.33333333333 6.3333333333 4.11111111111 8.33333333333
366.666666667 316.666666667 316.66666667 205.555555556 416.666666667

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative
Positive
(50%) Leaf (75%) Leaf (100%) Leaf Control
Control
extract extract extract (Distilled
(Levamisole)
water)

A 9 6 3 7 9
Replicate 1 B 6 5 4 2 4
C 5 4 5 4 4
A 4 7 2 6 5
Replicate 2 B 7 5 6 7 6
C 5 4 5 3 3
A 6 6 4 3 8
Replicate 3 B 8 4 4 2 4
C 6 7 6 6 8
Mean Average 6.22222222222 5.33333333333 4.3333333333 4.44444444444 5.66666666667
311.111111111 266.666666667 216.66666667 222.222222222 283.333333333

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative
Positive
(50%) Leaf (75%) Leaf (100%) Leaf Control
Control
extract extract extract (Distilled
(Levamisole)
water)

A 3 4 3 8 1
Replicate 1 B 9 6 4 13 5
C 4 3 3 8 2
A 6 5 6 9 0
Replicate 2 B 8 3 2 6 3
C 4 3 3 4 4
A 4 4 2 5 4
Replicate 3 B 5 4 1 7 2
C 6 5 4 2 4
Mean Average 5.44444444444 4.11111111111 3.1111111111 6.88888888889 2.77777777778
272.222222222 205.555555556 155.55555556 344.444444444 138.888888889

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative
Positive
(50%) Leaf (75%) Leaf (100%) Leaf Control
Control
extract extract extract (Distilled
(Levamisole)
water)

A 5 9 4 9 1
Replicate 1 B 6 0 1 9 1
C 3 3 3 7 2
A 5 3 1 11 0
Replicate 2 B 5 8 1 11 3
C 3 2 4 5 0
A 4 1 4 8 2
Replicate 3 B 6 6 0 8 1
C 4 1 1 7 0
Mean Average 4.55555555556 3.66666666667 2.1111111111 8.33333333333 1.11111111111
227.777777778 183.333333333 105.55555556 416.666666667 55.5555555556
FECAL EGG COUNT
Day 0
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)
A 400 200 350 250 600
Replicate 1 B 300 400 400 300 350
C 450 300 350 200 300
A 400 250 450 50 400
Replicate 2 B 200 350 300 250 450
C 300 350 300 350 250
A 250 450 150 200 550
Replicate 3 B 450 250 250 100 450
C 550 300 300 150 400
Mean Average 366.66667 316.66667 316.66667 205.55556 416.66667

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 450 300 150 350 450

Replicate 1 B 300 250 200 100 200
C 250 200 250 200 200
A 200 350 100 300 250
Replicate 2 B 350 250 300 350 300
C 250 200 250 150 150
A 300 300 200 150 400
Replicate 3 B 400 200 200 100 200
C 300 350 300 300 400
Mean Average 311.11111 266.66667 216.66667 222.22222 283.33333 Mean Average

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 150 200 150 400 50

Replicate 1 B 450 300 200 650 250
C 200 150 150 400 100
A 300 250 300 450 0
Replicate 2 B 400 150 100 300 150
C 200 150 150 200 200
A 200 200 100 250 200
Replicate 3 B 250 200 50 350 100
C 300 250 200 100 200
Mean Average 272.22222 205.55556 155.55556 344.44444 138.88889 Mean Average

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 250 450 200 450 50

Replicate 1 B 300 0 50 450 50
C 150 150 150 350 100
A 250 150 50 550 0
Replicate 2 B 250 400 50 550 150
C 150 100 200 250 0
A 200 50 200 400 100
Replicate 3 B 300 300 0 400 50
C 200 50 50 350 0
Mean Average 227.77778 183.33333 105.55556 416.66667 55.555556 Mean Average
FECAL EGG COUNT REDUCTION PER WEEK %FECAL EGG COUNT REDU

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A -50 -100 200 -100 150

Replicate 1 B 0 150 200 200 150 Replicate 1
C 200 100 100 0 100
A 200 -100 350 -250 150
Replicate 2 B -150 100 0 -100 150 Replicate 2
C 50 150 50 200 100
A -50 150 -50 50 150
Replicate 3 B 50 50 50 0 250 Replicate 3
C 250 -50 0 -150 0
Mean Average 55.555556 50 100 -16.66667 133.33333 Mean Average

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 250 0 200 -150 550

Replicate 1 B -150 100 200 -350 100 Replicate 1
C 250 150 200 -200 200
A 100 0 150 -400 400
Replicate 2 B -200 200 200 -50 300 Replicate 2
C 100 200 150 150 50
A 50 250 50 -50 350
Replicate 3 B 200 50 200 -250 350 Replicate 3
C 250 50 100 50 200
Mean Average 94.444444 111.11111 161.11111 -138.8889 277.77778 Mean Average

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 150 -250 150 -200 550

Replicate 1 B 0 400 350 -150 300 Replicate 1
C 300 150 200 -150 200
A 150 100 400 -500 400
Replicate 2 B -50 -50 250 -300 300 Replicate 2
C 150 250 100 100 250
A 50 400 -50 -200 450
Replicate 3 B 150 -50 250 -300 400 Replicate 3
C 350 250 250 -200 400
Mean Average 138.88889 133.33333 211.11111 -211.1111 361.11111 Mean Average
FECAL EGG COUNT REDUCTION PER WEEK

Day 7
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A -12.50 -50.00 57.14 -40.00 25.00

B 0.00 37.50 50.00 66.67 42.86
C 44.44 33.33 28.57 0.00 33.33
A 50.00 -40.00 77.78 -500.00 37.50
B -75.00 28.57 0.00 -40.00 33.33
C 16.67 42.86 16.67 57.14 40.00
A -20.00 33.33 -33.33 25.00 27.27
B 11.11 20.00 20.00 0.00 55.56
C 45.45 -16.67 0.00 -100.00 0.00
an Average 17.857143 18.75 46.153846 -7.5 47.058824

Day 14
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
 Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 62.50 0.00 57.14 -60.00 91.67

B -50.00 25.00 50.00 -116.67 28.57
C 55.56 50.00 57.14 -100.00 66.67
A 25.00 0.00 33.33 -800.00 100.00
B -100.00 57.14 66.67 -20.00 66.67
C 33.33 57.14 50.00 42.86 20.00
A 20.00 55.56 33.33 -25.00 63.64
B 44.44 20.00 80.00 -250.00 77.78
C 45.45 16.67 33.33 33.33 50.00
an Average 25.757576 35.087719 50.877193 -67.56757 66.666667

Day 21
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5

Negative Positive
(50%) (75%) (100%)
Control Control
Leaf Leaf Leaf
(Distilled (Levamis
extract extract extract
water) ole)

A 37.50 -125.00 42.86 -80.00 91.67

B 0.00 100.00 87.50 -50.00 85.71
C 66.67 50.00 57.14 -75.00 66.67
A 37.50 40.00 88.89 -1000.00 100.00
B -25.00 -14.29 83.33 -120.00 66.67
C 50.00 71.43 33.33 28.57 100.00
A 20.00 88.89 -33.33 -100.00 81.82
B 33.33 -20.00 100.00 -300.00 88.89
C 63.64 83.33 83.33 -133.33 100.00
an Average 37.878788 42.105263 66.666667 -102.7027 86.666667
ANOVA

Summary of Data
Treatments
1 2 3 4 5 Total
N 9 9 9 9 9 45

∑X 135.17 128.92 216.83 -531.19 294.85 244.58

Mean 15.0189 14.3244 24.0922 -59.0211 32.7611 5.435

∑X2 7498.187 9459.141 14419.73 271534.9 11520.57 314432.5

Std.Dev. 26.144 30.8473 33.9039 173.2713 15.2519 84.3563

Result Details

Source SS df MS

Between-treatments 48782.45 4 12195.61 F = 1.84558

Within-treatments 264320.7 40 6608.018

Total 313103.2 44

The f-ratio value is 1.84558. The p-value is .13911. The result is not significant at p < .05.
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

The Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within your ANOV

A couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's worth bear

Q.05 = 4.0391
Pairwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 109.4458
Q.01 = 4.9308

HSD.01 = 133.6078

T1:T2 M1 = 15.02 0.69 Q = 0.03 (p = .00000)

M2 = 14.32

T1:T3 M1 = 15.02 9.07 Q = 0.33 (p = .99927)

M3 = 24.09

T1:T4 M1 = 15.02 74.04 Q = 2.73 (p = .31757)

M4 = -59.02

T1:T5 M1 = 15.02 17.74 Q = 0.65 (p = .99020)

M5 = 32.76

T2:T3 M2 = 14.32 9.77 Q = 0.36 (p = .99903)

M3 = 24.09
T2:T4 M2 = 14.32 73.35 Q = 2.71 (p = .32674)
M4 = -59.02
T2:T5 M2 = 14.32 18.44 Q = 0.68 (p = .98866)
M5 = 32.76
T3:T4 M3 = 24.09 83.11 Q = 3.07 (p = .21237)
M4 = -59.02
T3:T5 M3 = 24.09 8.67 Q = 0.32 (p = .99939)
M5 = 32.76
T4:T5 M4 = -59.02 91.78 Q = 3.39 (p = .13765)
M5 = 32.76
omparisons within your ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between your

result. Second, it's worth bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate if t
ll difference between your sample means. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs o

ey's HSD is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached significance.
which of the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signficant difference.
ANOVA
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)
Summary of Data
Treatments The Tukey's HSD (honestly sig
1 2 3 4 5 Total
N 9 9 9 9 9 45 A couple of things to note. Fi
∑X 136.28 281.51 460.94 -1295.48 565 148.25

Mean 15.1422 31.2789 51.2156 -143.9422 62.7778 3.294 Pairwise Comparisons

∑X2 25669.67 13419.76 25707.51 733684.8 41109.19 839590.9

Std.Dev. 54.3209 24.0168 16.2027 261.5364 26.5512 138.096 T1:T2

Result Details

Source SS df MS T1:T3

Between-t 255931.5 4 63982.88 F = 4.38862

Within-tre 583171 40 14579.27 T1:T4

Total 839102.5 44

T1:T5

The f-ratio value is 4.38862. The p-value is .004908. The result is significant at p < .05.
T2:T3

T2:T4

T2:T5

T3:T4

T3:T5

T4:T5
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

The Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within your ANOVA data. The F statistic (abo

A couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's worth bearing in mind that there is s

Q.05 = 4.0391
Pairwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 162.5666
Q.01 = 4.9308

HSD.01 = 198.4559

M1 = 15.14 16.14 Q = 0.40 (p = .99853)

M2 = 31.28

M1 = 15.14 36.07 Q = 0.90 (p = .96864)

M3 = 51.22

M1 = 15.14 159.08 Q = 3.95 (p = .05771)

M4 = -143.94

M1 = 15.14 47.64 Q = 1.18 (p = .91746)

M5 = 62.78
M2 = 31.28 19.94 Q = 0.50 (p = .99664)
M3 = 51.22
M2 = 31.28 175.22 Q = 4.35 (p = .02909)
M4 = -143.94
M2 = 31.28 31.5 Q = 0.78 (p = .98089)
M5 = 62.78
M3 = 51.22 195.16 Q = 4.85 (p = .01170)
M4 = -143.94
M3 = 51.22 11.56 Q = 0.29 (p = .99960)
M5 = 62.78
M4 = -143.94 206.72 Q = 5.14 (p = .00671)
M5 = 62.78
ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between your sample means. Tukey's HSD test allows

h bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached significa
eans. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signficant differen

core has not reached significance.

m - there is a signficant difference.
ANOVA

Summary of Data
Treatments
1 2 3 4 5 Total
N 9 9 9 9 9 45

∑X 283.64 274.36 543.05 -1829.76 781.43 52.72

Mean 31.5156 30.4844 60.3389 -203.3067 86.8256 1.172

∑X2 15943.33 50276.77 46769.2 1147518 69235.32 1329743

Std.Dev. 29.5894 72.3819 41.8362 311.351 13.1682 173.8391

Result Details

Source SS df MS

Between-treatments 489858.6 4 122464.6 F = 5.83288

Within-treatments 839822.4 40 20995.56

Total 1329681 44

The f-ratio value is 5.83288. The p-value is .000854. The result is significant at p < .05.
Post Hoc Tukey HSD (beta)

The Tukey's HSD (honestly significant difference) procedure facilitates pairwise comparisons within your ANOVA data. The F st

A couple of things to note. First, a blue value for Q (below) indicates a significant result. Second, it's worth bearing in mind tha

Q.05 = 4.0391
Pairwise Comparisons HSD.05 = 195.0864
Q.01 = 4.9308

HSD.01 = 238.1551

T1:T2 M1 = 31.52 1.03 Q = 0.02 (p = .00000)

M2 = 30.48

T1:T3 M1 = 31.52 28.82 Q = 0.60 (p = .99311)

M3 = 60.34

T1:T4 M1 = 31.52 234.82 Q = 4.86 (p = .01141)

M4 = -203.31

T1:T5 M1 = 31.52 55.31 Q = 1.15 (p = .92611)

M5 = 86.83

T2:T3 M2 = 30.48 29.85 Q = 0.62 (p = .99212)

M3 = 60.34
T2:T4 M2 = 30.48 233.79 Q = 4.84 (p = .01189)
M4 = -203.31
T2:T5 M2 = 30.48 56.34 Q = 1.17 (p = .92137)
M5 = 86.83
T3:T4 M3 = 60.34 263.65 Q = 5.46 (p = .00352)
M4 = -203.31
T3:T5 M3 = 60.34 26.49 Q = 0.55 (p = .99502)
M5 = 86.83
T4:T5 M4 = -203.31 290.13 Q = 6.01 (p = .00113)
M5 = 86.83
hin your ANOVA data. The F statistic (above) tells you whether there is an overall difference between your sample means. Tukey's HSD tes

it's worth bearing in mind that there is some disagreement about whether Tukey's HSD is appropriate if the F-ratio score has not reached
ample means. Tukey's HSD test allows you to determine between which of the various pairs of means - if any of them - there is a signfican

F-ratio score has not reached significance.

y of them - there is a signficant difference.