Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
Cancer is the second most leading cause for human mortality after cardiovascular disease.
According to the recent report of WHO, new cases have risen to 18.1 million in 2018.
Cancer is an uncontrolled growth of malignant cells that arise in any part of the body caused
by abnormal growth in normal cells. The symptoms of cancer are not general or specific and
mainly characterized by the type of cancer such as liver, lung, stomach, breast and colon
cancer are most common. Cancer is the most formidable affliction charac- terized by a
change in the mechanism that affects cell proliferation and differentiation resulted in solid
tumors including sarcomas, lymphomas and carcinomas [1]. One of the most fatal forms is
Leukaemia, which generally occurs through blood [2]. The main therapeutic treatment
includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery available for this most leading cause of
death worldwide. Chemotherapy associated with the use of low molecular weight drugs to
block or destroy cancer cells. A small molecular target can penetrate cancer cells and the
large molecule can attack as a whole to cancer cells, thus weaken them or can destroy their
enzymes involved in a mechanism [3]. Initial treatments were involving only surgical
methods. Chemotherapy became an attractive treatment since the 1940s with the development
of drug based upon nitrogen-mustard, a powerful class of alkylating agents and another
similar class in- cludes antimetabolites. The nitrogen-mustard analogues show activ- ity to
destroy cancer cells by attacking DNA and reduce its ability to replicate, while
antimetabolites arrest the S-phase of cell division responsible for the synthesis of DNA.
These findings lead towards the discovery of new potent chemotherapeutics [4]. The major
side effects associated with chemotherapeutic include hair loss, nausea, bone marrow
suppression, etc. because they have harmful effects on healthy cells along with cancer cells
[5]. Furthermore, the chemo- therapy drug treatment associated with the selectivity of
conven- tional chemotherapeutic agents and their acquirement by cancer cells for multiple
drug resistance is still a major limitation [6]. In an effort to combat chemotherapy, several
targeted therapies include modulator, apoptosis inducers, immunotherapies, angiogenesis
inhibitors, hormone therapy, Interleukin-6 antibodies therapy, toxin delivery molecule and
gene therapy, which have been used in can- cer treatment [7-10]. Several experimental
models for the study of cancer are available, which include cancer cell lines, xenografts,
tumor primary cell culture, paraffin-embedded samples and geneti- cally engineered mice
[11]. The cancer cell line model is considered to be an ideal model for the study of cancer due
to several advan- tages, including easy handling, instant accessibility, the similarity with an
initial tumor, highly homogeneous and reliability of results, high variation in availability
[12].
Heterocyclic compounds are an important class of organic chemistry as they are an integral
part of many drugs, natural prod- ucts and chemicals used in our daily life. Heterocyclic
compounds are composed of at least one heteroatom in a cyclic structure. Oxy- gen, nitrogen
and sulphur are the most frequently used hetero atoms.
O
O O O
S S
F3C S
NH2 NH2 N
S
N N O
O
O
Ethoxazolamide
Riluzole Probenazole
Cl
S H2N
NH
N N S
N
H
N O
Pramipexole
Ziprasidone
Cl
N N HN
S
N N N S
O
H
N
HO
Levamisole Dasatinib
O
F S N
O
N
N
O
PMX610 YM-201627
[21] and imidazole [22]. Among heterocyclic compounds, thiazoles gained the attention of
medicinal chemists because of their broad spectrum of biological activities. Thiazoles are
five-membered heterocyclic compounds which contain Sulphur and Nitrogen at position-1
and position -3, respectively. Its chemical formula is C3H3NS. Thiazole is a clear yellow
colour liquid. Its boiling point is 116-118°C and specific gravity is 1.2. It is sparingly soluble
in water and soluble in alcohol and ether [23]. Naturally, thiazole has originated from
thiamine (vitamin B1), a water-soluble vitamin. Thiazole are an integral part of many potent
biological active drugs, including Isavuconazole (Antifungal) [24], Ritonavir (Anti-HIV)
[25], Nizatidine (Anti-Ulcer) [26]. Several anticancer agents bear- ing thiazole moiety also
reported in the literature, including Sulfa- thiazole, Bleomycin, Dasatinib, Epothilones,
Dabrafenib and Thia- zofurine [27]. Fused thiazole is a significant and extensively used
scaffold in drug designing and the development of novel therapeutic agents. Fused thiazole
scaffolds are considered to be a promising group of anticancer agents. Aryl group plays a
significant role in anticancer activity, but substitution at the different position might be
responsible for a better activity such as –Cl group at 3rd position of benzothiazole, phenyl and
some bulkier aryl group at imidazole thiazole ring, methoxy group at thiopyrano [2,3-d]
thiazole ring, napthyl substituent at phenothiazine ring included in this re- view. Some of the
marketed drugs bearing fused thiazole scaffolds are listed in Fig. (1), like Riluzole
(anticonvulsant), Ethoxazolamide (carbonic anhydrase inhibitor), Probenazole (herbicide),
Ziprasi- done (anti-psychotic), Pramipexole (parkinson’s inhibitor). Few anticancer drugs
containing fused thiazole scaffolds as marketed drugs and used in clinical trials are illustrated
in Figs. (2 and 3). Phortress was used in a xenograft model in phase 1 [28], voreloxin was
used in phase II for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and acute myeloid leukemia [29],
Dasatinib was used in chronic myelogenous leukemia treatment, SNS-032 was used for
cyclin-dependent kinases and AC 220 as FLT3 inhibitor in phase III in clinical trials [30].
Benzo thiazole derivative 2-(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)-5- fluorobenzthiazole acting through
a novel mechanism, has also find importance in the clinical trial phase I in the UK [31].
2. SYNTHETIC STRATEGIES
electrophilic carbon of thiocyanate ion. The final target compounds were af- forded by
the cyclization in the presence of bromine and chloro- form [38]. In synthetic route 8, the
Mannich reaction mechanism was followed in which 2-iminothiazolidine-4-one 15
reacted with formalin and aniline in a molar ratio 1:2:1 yielded the desired prod- uct [39].
In route 9, the synthesis of the target compound was re- ported in two steps. In this
strategy, 2-amino-4-(substituted phenyl) thiazole 16 was refluxed with cyanoketone 17 in
DMF in the pres- ence of Triethylamine (TEA). The intermediate thus obtained was
refluxed with hydrazine hydrate in ethanol for 3h to afford fused thiazole compound as
the desired product [40]. In route 10, 3,4- dihydropyrimidine-2-thione 18 was treated
with α-haloester 19 under reflux in ethanol to afford the product with excellent yield
[41]. The synthetic route 11 was a two-step protocol consisting of the treatment of 2-
aminothiophenol 20 with p-anthranilic acid 21 in the presence of molecular iodine as a
catalyst to afford the cyclized intermediate which on further heating with substituted
sulphonyl chloride 22 and acetic anhydride afforded the desired product [42].
Similarly, various strategies for the synthesis of thiazole fused with five-membered
rings are summarized in Scheme 2. In syn-thetic route 12, PBTz was prepared via
Buchwald Hartwig coupling between a branched alkyl amine and silylated bromide in a
sealed tube at 170°C yielded intermediate 2, 2′-dibromo-5, 5′-bithiazole 23. Then
deprotection was done using TBAF, which then exposed to NBS in DMF directly to be
bromination to yield PBTz
S
O N
NH
H O N
S N H
N N
S N
N O HO N
O O
SNS-032 (BMS-387032)
Voreloxin
CH3
R S O S
N
NH H
(CH2)4 NH2 O N
N N
O NH2.2HCl
O N O
Phortres
AC 220
s
N N
H H
Fig. (3). Anticancer drugs containing fused thiazole scaffolds currently in clinical trials.
Route9
NH2 HOOC
O
SM +
EtO SH Cl F
SM
CN 4 5
17
+
R1
R4 Route 3 O
NH 2 H
S S
N
N
R3 O
N +
1,4-napthoquinone
S S
16 AcOH,hydroquinon
ecatalyst,1h
R2 Ar
6 O
7
H S NH2 Route4
H2 N
HN O
N CHO
N
S
15 +
Route
9 R
8 8
O
R1 R
NH O OEt
R2 NH2 H 2N O
NH2 +
R1 N S
H O
OE H2N HN R1
14
13 + 11
10 12
Route 7 Route 5
followed by neu- tralization with cold aqueous sodium carbonate solution, which afforded the
product with good yield. The alternate route was fol- lowed for the same reaction using
microwave irradiation in DMF for 4-7min.
Leukemia
Tryosin kinase inhibitors Colon cancer inhibitors
CEM, HL60, U937
inhibitors
Tubulin inhibitors
CNS SNB -75 inhibitors
R1
R2
CDK1 inhibitors
N
Melanoma cancer
cell inhibitors
Fused Thiazole
Fox M1 inhibitors
Angeogenesis inhibitors
Breast cancer
Ovarian cancer cell inhibitors
cell inhibitors
Dual Src/ AbI kinase inhibitors
The substrate used could be prepared by the reaction of aryl substituted acetic acid 27 and
thiosemicarbazide 28 in sul- phuric acid on heating up to 70°C [45]. In route 15, the
preparation of hydrate hydrazones was outlined. In this procedure, ethyl 6-(4-
bromophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-3-acetate 29 was refluxed with hydrate hydrazine to
give intermediate[6-(4-bromophenyl)imidazo [2,1-b]thiazol-3-yl]acetic acid hydrazide which
then condensed with a suitable aromatic aldehyde to afford the target compound [46]. In
route 16, ethyl-2-aminothiazole-4-acetate 30 was reacted with 4-chloro-2-
bromoacetophenone 31 and acetone in the presence of ethanol to obtain ethyl-6-(4-
chlorophrnyl imidazo [2,1-b]thiazol- 3-acetate hydrobromide. It was a key intermediate and
can be fur- ther used for the preparation of various derivatives [47]. In route 17, dithioxamide
32 in nitrobenzene was stirred with aldehyde 33 at 130°C for 24h under inert nitrogen
atmosphere to afford 2,5- disubstituted thiazole[5,4-d] [48]. In route 18, the target compound
was obtained by the 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reaction of thia- zolium derivative 34 with
electron deficient alkene 35. The reaction was catalyzed by a base and terakispyridinecobalt
(ll) dichromate [PyCo(HCrO4)2 [49]. In route 19, various 2-aminothiazoles 36 were cyclized
in the presence of ethyl bromopyruvate. The intermediate thus obtained afforded the target
compound imidazo [2,1- b]thiazole-6-carboxylic acid by chlorination, followed by hydroly-
sis with lithium hydroxide [50]. In approach 20, the starting mate- rial 3-[1-(4-(2-
methylpropyl) phenyl) ethyl]-1,2,4triazole-5-thione 37 was prepared by Ibuprofen. It was
cyclized with chloroacetic acid 38 and suitable aldehyde 39 in the presence of acetic acid,
acetic anhydride and sodium acetate [51].
Fused thiazoles are one of the key scaffolds among heterocyclic compounds and had
drawn the attention of medicinal chemists due to their potent chemotherapeutic activities.
Several members are reported in the literature as effective agents in chemotherapy. A
different mechanism of action is followed by fused thiazoles for their anticancer activity,
which includes inhibition of certain en- zymes like Src and AbI kinase and cytochrome.
Similarly, fused thiazole targets different cancer cells such as MCF-7 (human breast
cancer), HEPG2 (human hepatocellular liver-carcinoma), CNS (central nervous
systemcancer ), SNB-75, Renal UO-31, leukaemia, colon, melanoma (skin cancer),
ovarian, prostate, breast cancer, etc., as shown in Fig. (4). Preliminary screening of the
target com- pound revealed the significant inhibitory activity against different cancer cell
lines. In this review, we will elaborate various types of fused thiazole as an anticancer
agent.
Benzothiazole
Benzothiazole (BT) has become a privileged scaffold over the last two decades
because of its wonderful pharmacological profile, including anticancer activity. Further
substitution and other rings fused with benzothiazole increased its activity. In 2019,
Shokrollahi et al. designed Schiff based fused thiazole from 4,5,6,7 tetrahydro-
benzo[d]thiazole-2,6-diamine and aldehydes, as depicted in Fig. (5). Furthermore,
compounds 40-43 were evaluated for their anticancer potential against human cancer
cells MCF-7 and HepG2 using MTT based assay and compound 40 was found to be most
potent against both MCF-7 and HepG2 cancer cells after an incubation period of 48hrs,
as shown by IC50 values in Table 1. In addition, the target compound was able to bind
with Human Serum Albumin, con- cluded from the computational docking method and
experimental fluorescence quenching and circular dichroism method and thus possessed
one binding site [52].
In 2019, Reddy et al. prepared a series of pyrazole linked ben- zothiazole compound
44-45, as shown in Fig. (6). All the tested compounds have shown potential inhibition
against VEFGR-2 pro- tein and four other cancer cell lines, namely colon (HT29),
prostate (PC3), lung (A549), kidney cell (Hek-293T), brain cell (U87MG). Compound
44-45 exhibited VEFGR-2 inhibition with IC50 value 97nM and 109nM, respectively,
compared with standard reference compound Axitinib with an IC50 value of 39nM.
Further docking study reveals the interaction of the active site of VEFGR-2 protein with
compounds 44 and 45, which can easily fit into binding pock- ets of VEFGR-2 protein.
Compound 44 also acted as a potent in- hibitor of U87MG and PC-3 multicellular
spheroids and increased G0/G1 population, arrest cell cycle and induced apoptosis through
mitochondrial function [53].
In 2019, Mishra et al. reported a Schiff base linked with ben- zothiazole 46a and
explored its MCF-7 inhibitory and DNA cleav- age activity with a standard reference
compound tamoxifen. A fur- ther calorimetric study using MTT based assay reveals that
com- pound 46a, as shown in Fig. (7), exhibited approximately 86% in- hibition against
MCF-7 breast cancer cells with IC50 value 150µg/ml and against normal cells IC50 value
973µg/ml. In addi- tion, docking studies reveal the interaction of compound 46 with
EGFR tyrosine kinase domain and in silico pharmacokinetic study of compound 46 done
with Swiss ADME server explored inhibition against certain cytochrome enzymes
including CYP2C19, P-gp substrate, CYP2D6 and CYPC9, which proves it a promising
lead for the development of anticancer drugs [54].
In 2018, Zehra et al. reported the synthesis of benzothiazole Schiff bases ligands
complexes by the refluxing of different ben- zothiazoles with o-vanillin 47-48 followed
by complexation with Cu(II) and Zn(II), as shown in Fig. (8) and explored their
anticancer activity against different human cancer cells named HepG2, HeLa, A498,
MCF-7 and MIA-PA-CA-2. Further SAR and docking study reveals that chlorine
substituent is responsible for the inhibition and cytotoxic activity as it increases the
hydrophobic and lyophilic character of the target compound. Moreover, the complex with
copper metal 47 shows excellent inhibition against HeLa cancer cell with an IC50 value of
4.8 μg/ml, while the complex with zinc metal 48 was almost inactive as proved by
cytotoxic profile.
OH
R1 OH
N
N
N
N
S R2
N R2 S
N
40 HO
HO
41-43
R1
40 - - 3.01±2.71 1.29±3.07
41 H H 15.39±0.86 51.19±4.86
42 H Br 11.15±0.45 43.14±4.23
R1
N
HN
N
S R2
N
O
44-45
H 2N
(Et)2N OH S
N N NH
N NH S N
N
S
HN O
S
OH
NH2
Cl
Imidazoles are well-known privileged scaffolds as a large part of these molecules have
numerous applications in the medicinal field. A plethora of compounds are reported in
the literature as anti- bacterial, antifungal, anthelmintic and antitumor activity [57]. Le-
vamisole is a potent anticancer drug reported in the literature bear- ing imidazole-thiazole
moiety.
In 2019, Nagireddy et al. reported the synthesis of Noscapine coupled derivatives 49(a-f),
as shown in Fig. (9) with imidazo[2,1- b]triazole from naturally occuring alkaloid
Noscapine and explored their anticancer activity against different cancer cells named
MIA- PaCa-2 (pancreatic), SK-N-SH (neuroblastoma), DU-145 (pros- tate), and MCF-
7(breast), using the SRB assay. It was evaluated that o-imidazothiazolyl noscapinoids
were more potent than N- imidazothiazolyl noscapinoids towards the inhibitory activity.
Flow cytometry study further showed that compounds 49b-f arrest cell cycle in the G2/M
phase. All the tested compounds caused signifi- cant degradation in caspase -3 and PARP
concentration, which induced cell apoptosis in MIAPaCa-2 cancer cells. Molecular mod-
elling illustrates the binding interaction of tubulin protein with the target compound and
revealed that substitution of the methoxy group at the 6th position of the phthalide ring
responsible for anti- cancer activity [58].
In 2016, Karaman and coworkers prepared the imidazole- thiazole compound bearing
hydrazone moiety by the reaction of ethyl-2-amionothiazole-4-acetate with 4-chloro-2’-
bromoacetophenone in acetone, the intermediate formed was treated with hydrazine
hydrate followed by aromatic aldehyde to afford the target com- pound arylidene
Cl
H3CO OH N
47-48
In 2014, Kamal et al. synthesized chalcone hybrid bearing imi- dazo [2,1-b]thiazole moiety
using benzoin as a starting material. An anticancer evaluation was done using different cancer
cells against doxorubicin as a standard drug, compound 50 was found to show the most
promising inhibition against lung cancer cell (A549). Thus, A549 cancer cell was selected to
study the cell cycle inhibi- tion and tubulin polymerisation inhibition. Furthermore, confocal
microscopy of immunohistochemistry studies of tubulin illustrates the inhibition of A549
cells as a perfect order network was found in control cells than the target compound and
standard drug Nocoda- zole used. Compound 50 was able to bind with tubulin protein ef-
fectively with IC50 value 1.43µM, while the reference compound Nocodazole showed IC50
value 1.23µM, as illustrated in Fig. (11). In addition, compound 50 was also able to bind cell
cycle progres- sion in the G2/M phase via inducing centrosome formation and abnormal
spindle structure, which confirmed its anti-proliferative activity [59].
In 2015, Patel et al. synthesized a novel and potent ALK5 in- hibitor 53 containing
thiadiazole fused with the imidazole ring, as illustrated in Fig. (13). Further docking study
reveals that the sul- phur atom of the thiadiazole ring forms strong interactions with His-283
in the hinge region of kinase, the binding site of the target. In addition, SAR study reveals
that electron-withdrawing group like fluorine on the phenyl ring contributes to ALK5
inhibition [62]. Other thiadiazole and imidazole hybrid molecules 54-56 containing m-(α-
bromoacryloylamido) phenyl moiety linked at the 6th position of the imidazole-thiadiazole
ring were reported by Romangoli and his coworkers, as depicted in Fig. (14). The reported
compounds 54-56 are found to be most effective to bring about apoptosis among the series
prepared with IC50 value comparable or lower than standard reference compound Melphalan,
as summarized in Table 2. The antiproliferative activity was associated with the release of
cyto- chrome-c and cleavage of caspases [63].
O
O
F OMe
N Cl
N
O N O N
N H
S O
N S
O
O
H O
MeO H
OMe
H
O OMe Br
N
O O
N N
OMe 49b H
O OMe S
O
O
49a H
O OMe 49c
O
OMe O
O
OMe
S
N OMe Br
N O N
H
N
S N O N CH3
O H
O
H S
O
OMe O
O H
O 49d
O OMe 49f
O
Cl
N NH N
HO
N
S
H
49
MeO
N
N
MeO F
O
Group responsible to inhibit
N
50
tubulin protein by interacting
51-52
R N
S H
N
N Br
54-56
HN
O O R
N
N
57-60
In 2017, Hassan et al. reported the synthesis of thiazole [4,5- d]pyrimidines and evaluated
their antitumor activity using a stan- dard reference compound doxorubicin. The results
concluded that compound 61 was found to be most active towards breast, prostate, renal,
ovarian, non-small cell lung, colon, CNS and leukemia can- cer cells lines, as depicted in Fig.
(16). Furthermore, the SAR correlation of the compound reveals that the presence of amine
and methoxy group at phenyl ring increases the activity of analogs than unsubstituted
congener while the presence of the electron- withdrawing group like chlorine decreases the
activity ten times than other analogs. In addition, molecular modelling reveals that
compound substituted with the amine and trimethoxy group at the phenyl ring showed
binding interaction with DNA bases like ade- nine, cytosine and thiamine and the study was
compared using a standard reference compound distamycin [70].
In 2017, Yousif et al. synthesized new thiazolopyrimidine de- rivative and explored their
anticancer activity against HepG-2, HCT-116 and PC-3 cancer cell lines. Compound 62a
with IC50 value 66.5±3.6µg/mL was found to be more potent and showed higher cytotoxic
activity by dose-dependent behaviour than stan- dard compound doxorubicin with IC 50 value
75.24±4.1µg/mL against PC-3 cancer cells, while for other two cancer cells exhibited weak
to moderate cytotoxicity, as illustrated in Fig. (17). Further- more, substitution at pyrimidine
nucleus demonstrates a significant effect on the cytotoxic activity of the target compound
[71]. Basiony and his coworkers also reported the synthesis of thia- zolopyrimidine
substituted with thienyl- or chlorophenyl- deriva- tives by incorporating sugar hydrazone
moiety. Derivatives 62(b-e) prepared and screened for their anticancer activity against
different cancer cells include Caco-2, MDA-MB-231, HCT-116 and MCF-7 cancer cells, as
depicted in Fig. (18). Compound 62 (b-c, e) pos- sessed the lowest IC50 value 9.63, 4.79,
16.82µg/mL, respectively and exhibited higher cytotoxicity with a regular decrease in cell
proliferation than others in a dose-dependent manner against Caco-
2 cells. Compound 62(d) also showed better inhibition against MDA-MB-231 cells with the
lowest IC50 value of 23.35µg/mL. It was further concluded that sugar hydrazone derivative
62(b,c) with the hydroxyl and xylosyl group was more potent than 62(d,e) with an acetyl
group. The cytotoxicity was also elaborated with thia- zolopyrimidine substituted with
thienyl- or chlorophenyl- deriva- tives without sugar moiety, which were proved to be more
cytotoxic against HCT-116 cancer cells [72].
Thiazoles condensed with quinazoline are a vital class of het- erocyclic compounds and
possess a wide spectrum of biological properties. Al-omary et al. reported the preparation of
thiazolo [2,3- b]quinazoline derivatives 66-75, as shown in Fig. (20) and evalu- ated their
anticancer properties. Compound 68 is the most active compound and exhibited broad-
spectrum activity with a GI50 value
2.5 lower than standard compound 5-flourouracil, but the introduc- tion of the methyl group
to 68 leads to an inactive compound 67. The unsubstituted compound 66 and methoxy
substituent 75 are mostly inactive compounds proved by structure-activity relation- ship. The
position of the methyl group also serves a useful parame- ter. Compounds 69 and 72 with
methyl substituent showed moder- ate anticancer activity, while compound 73 becomes
inactive.
63 Phenyl 50.10
64 p-chlorophenyl 65.14
65 p- methoxyphenyl 55.17
Ar Ar
HO O N AcO O N
S n(AcOHC)
n(HOHC) S
N NH N N NH N
62(b-c)
62(d-e)
sugar moiety with n- b,c=D-
where Ar- xylotetritolyl; n=3
b,d=4-chlorophenylc,e d,e=penta-Oacetyl-galactopentitolyl;n=4
H3CO
S
S
H3CO
H3CO N CH3
N
N N
N S
H3CO OCH 3
N
H3CO
CH3 OCH3
Inactive Inactive 67
Inactive H 3CO
66
75 OCH3 S
H 3CO
N
OCH 3 N
H3CO
H3CO
S
H3CO N OCH 3
N
S most active
OCH 3
H3CO
moderate active R4
N N
OCH 3
74
R1 R1 68
OCH 3
S S
H3CO R2 R2
N
CH 3
N R3 R3 N N
CH3
Inactve
73
moderate active 69
OCH 3 S
H3CO S
S
N
CH3 N N
N N
N
moderate active
72 Cl Cl
Cl Cl
70
71
OCH 3
R1
N
Br
S
N
N
H3CO
76-78
76 Cl 2.59 11.55
78 F 8.96 22.1
Table 5. IC50 value (in µM) of compound 76-78 against two different cancer cell
lines.
In 2014, lozyanski and coworkers synthesized a series of thiopyrano and thiazole hybrid
compounds with cinnamic acid de- rivative by hetero Diels Alder reaction and their
anticancer activity was evaluated against a panel of 60 cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the
SAR study reveals that methoxy and chloro substituent present
when R= 1-C10H7,
compound is most
active
N
S
N
S
when R= 4-NO2-C6H4 ,
compound is inactive
O Ph
H
S N
R1 N O
SN
HH N
O
Ph
80-82
H
N O
HN R
when R = 4-Cl-C6H 4, R1=Me and Cl, showed
O
more cytotoxic effect
R1
83
OH
MeO
N
S
H
84
H H
R
when R=
F
F F
H H
N N
85 86
87
at the amide fragment increases the activity of compound 83, as shown in Fig. (24) [78]. In
addition, Atamanyuk et al. also reported thiopyrano [2,3-d]thiazoles 84 by hetero-Diels Alder
reaction con- taining napthoquinone fragments and explored their antineoplastic activity
against UACC-257- melanoma cancer cell lines as, illus- trated in Fig. (25). The mechanism
of action of the target compound was explored using COMPARE analysis and found the
similarity of 84 in cytotoxicity with some known anticancer agents including S- trityl-L-
cysteine, didemnin B and panсratistatin [79].
Steroids are an important class of natural products that control various cellular functions
including cell proliferation, apoptosis, homeostasis and differentiation. A wide range of
steroids were extracted from plants and microorganisms and showed a broad spectrum of
biological activity. Heterocyclic attached or fused ster- oid compounds such as androstanes,
oleandrigenin and galeterone are known to exhibit diverse pharmacological profiles.
In 2018, Ali et al. prepared aminothiazole-androstenone deriva- tives by the reaction of 6β-
bromoandrostenedion with different substituted thiourea and further evaluated their
anticancer activity against a panel of 60 cancer cell lines. Compounds 85-86 display
inhibition against different cancer cells, including colon, CNS, SF- 295, SF-539, melanoma
and renal cancer cells at 50% inhibitory concentration value less than 2µM [80]. In 2018,
Okolo also re-ported the aminothiazole-androstenones derivatives by simple methodology, in
which 6β-bromo androstenedione reacted with thioamides in hexafluoroisopropanol as a
reaction medium. In addi- tion, among the reported derivatives, compound 87 proved to be
most potent against 31 cancer cell lines out of 60 cancer cell lines at 50% inhibitory
concentration value less than 2.58 µM, as shown in Fig. (26) [81].
In 2016, Cui et al. evaluated the antitumor activity of D-ring fused 1,2,3-thiadiazole
dehydroepiandrosterine (DHEA) derivatives against various tumor cells, including breast
cancer cells, colon carcinoma cells, prostate cell, T lymphocyte cells, promyelocytic, and
leukemia cancer cell lines using the SRB assay. The antitumor activity was analysed using
different models subcutaneous xenograft growth model, metastasis model and orthotopic
xenograft growth. In addition, among all the tested compounds, significant activity exhibited
by only compound 88, as shown in Fig. (27) against human breast cancer cells (T47D) and all
other compounds were inactive towards all cancer cell lines, as shown in Table 7.
Furthermore, the primary mechanism study of compound 88 dem- onstrates that it induces
apoptosis by dose-dependent manner and phosphorylation of EphB3 and EphA2, but the cell
cycle arrest mechanism was not explored [82].
S
N
NH
88
S S
OH OH
N N
HO Me Me
Me
S Me
S
OH
N
OH
N
Me
Me
91
92
Pyrrolo [1,2-c]thiazoles are an important aromatic scaffold used for designing new promising
anticancer drug candidates. In 2014, Santosh et al. reported 6,7-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1H, 3H-
pyrrolo[1,2- c]thiazole derivatives, significant inhibitors of Triple-Negative (TN) breast
cancer cells. Compounds 89-92 are promising inhibi- tors against TN (HCC1806), MCF7,
and HCC1954 breast cancer cell lines, as shown in Fig. (28). Furthermore, it was concluded
from the SAR study that the hydroxy phenyl group at C-3 of the thiazole ring proves it most
promising TN inhibitor, methyl group at C-1 of the ring does not display any inhibition
against MCF-7 cells, as explained in Table 8. The study of long term survival and sensitivity
revealed that sensitivity of HCC1806 is less than 2% and compound 90 affects the survival of
HCC1806 cells. The total pro- tein growth reduction was found after the treatment of MCF-7
and HCC1806 cells with reported target compounds. Flow cytometry study illustrates the
decrease in viable cell population in the TN (HCC1806) cell line [83].
In 2013, Soares and his team explored anti-breast cancer agents by replacement of
substituent 1H,3H-pyrrole[1,2-c]thiazole 93-96, as shown in Fig. (29). Furthermore, the SAR
study concludes that the phenyl group at C-3 and the methyl group at C-5 are responsible for
the cytotoxic activity of compound 93. It can be concluded from IC50 values that removal or
substitution of the phenyl group has a significant effect on its cytotoxic value against MCF-7
cancer cells. To evaluate anticancer activity, cancer cells were incubated for different time
intervals in DMSO solution and proliferation in cells was illustrated using the MTT assay
[84].
concentra- tion of 25µM at the G1 phase after 24 hours and arrest cell cycle at G2/M phase
[85].
Thiazole [5,4-b] pyridine is a vital scaffold among the six- membered ring. In 2012, Gu and
Jin et al. prepared α-amino phos- phate derivatives 100-107 containing thiazole[5,4-b]
pyridine moi- ety, as shown in Fig. (31) and screened their anticancer activity against PC-3,
H460 cells and Bcap-37 cancer cell lines using the MTT assay. Compound 105 was found to
be the most potent inhibi- tor due to the p-fluorophenyl group, while replacement of methyl
or methoxy group results in a decrease in the activity of compounds 101 and 104. The
substituent fluoro present at the phenyl group is responsible for the significant inhibitory
activity and after removal of the fluoro group from compound 101 and 105, the inhibitory
activity decreases five times of compound 100 [86].
1,2,4 triazine and their bioisosterism with purines bases are found to have significant
anticancer activity. In 2019, El-Wakil et al. reported the multistep synthesis of thiazole-
hybrid triazine derivative 108, as shown in Fig. (32) and screened their anticancer activity
against a panel of 60 cancer cell lines and found that ten out of sixty cells are more sensitive
towards compound 108 with IC50 value 3.26-49.4µM. COMPARE analysis of the target
compound revealed that its antitumor inhibition was due to DNA binding simi- lar to that of
Clomesone [87].
CH2OCONHR1
CH2OCONHR1
N carbamates group responsiblefor better
cytotoxic effect than hydroxyl methyl
R2
97-99
OH
HO
OH
S N
OH
Me S N
Ph Me
IC = 21.5 µM
IC = 0.30 µM
HO
HO
Me
HO
MeO OMe OH
S N
N
Ph
OMe
Ph
S
95
96
IC50 = 59.9 µM
IC50 = 70.2 µM
Fig. (29). 1H, 3H pyrrole [1,2-c] thiazole derivative as anti-breast cancer agent.
Fused thiazole scaffolds fused or linked with other rings also exhibited therapeutic profile.
Many researchers have shown their interest in developing new drug candidates using fused
thiazole linked or tethered scaffold. In 2019, Prashanth et al. screened anti- cancer activity of
coumarin analogs linked with thiazole on mice leukemia cancer cells, as shown in Fig. (33).
Further SAR study confirmed that substitution of the methoxy group at coumarin and phenyl
fragments was responsible for the significant apoptogenic activity of compound 109. Among
the series, the most potent in- hibitory activity was evaluated using trypan blue, LDH leak
and MTT assay. The substitution of the methoxy and methyl group with hydrogen atom
decreases apoptosis. Furthermore, docking studies illustrate different interactions of target
compounds using caspase- 3, including Arg 207 or Asn 208 with hydrogen bonding with an
amide group of the target compound, a phenyl group of the target compound interacts with
the active site of caspase-3 bearing a ni- trogen atom [88].
Al-Ghorbani et al. reported a novel series of BT tethered with the piperazine ring as a
substituent at the C-2 position, as shown in Fig. (35). Furthermore, the anticancer activity of
BT derivative 112 was performed against DLA cancer cells in vitro and the IC50 was found
25µM, 22.6µM, and 23µM in trypan blue, MTT and LDH assays, respectively. SAR study of
the BT derivative reveals that the Bromine group at the phenyl ring is responsible for
angiogene- sis inhibition. The tumor inhibitory potential of the target was ob- served due to
the capture of the angiogenesis process on rVEGF165 using Chorio Allanotoic Membrane
(CAM) assay [90].
CONCLUSION
References
2. 2.Bursuk E. Gulcur H. Ercan M. 2010 The significance of body impedance and blood
viscosity measurements in thyroid diseases, Proceedings of Biomedical Engineering
Meeting (BIYOMUT), 15th National, 978-1-4244-6380-0, Antalya, April 2010
(http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5479828&tag=1).
12. 11.Mc Gregor A. M. 1996 The thyroid gland and disorders of thyroid function,
In: Oxford Fextbook of Medicine, Weatherall, DJ., Ledingham, JGG. & Warrell,
DA, 1603 1621 ), Oxford University Press, 0-19-262707-4, Oxford, 2
13. 12.Reed L. Pangaro L. N. 1995 Physiology of the thyroid gland I: synthesis and
release, iodine metabolism, and binding and transport, In: Principles and Practice of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, Becher, KL., 285 291 ), J.B. Lippincott Company, 0-
397-51404-2, Philadelphia.
16. 15.Snell R. S. 1995 Clinical Anatomy for my students (fifth edition), Little, Brown
and Company, 0-316-80135-6, Boston.
17. 16.Usala S. J. 1995 Physiology of the thyroid gland II: reseptors, postreceptor events,
and hormone resistance syndromes, In: Principle and Practice of Endocrinology and
Metabolism, Becker, KL., 292 298 ), J.B. Lippincott Company, 0-397-51404-2,
Philadelphia.
18. 17.Utiger R. D. 1997 Disorders of the thyroid gland, In: Textbook of Intecnal
Medrane, Kelley, WN., 2204 2219 ), Lippincott- Raven Publishers, 0-397-51540-5,
Philadelphia. . Andrews, Gavin P., Thomas P. Laverty, and David S. Jones.
"Mucoadhesive Polymeric Platforms for Controlled Drug Delivery." European
Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 71.3 (2009): 505-18. Print.
19. 2. Asane, GS, et al., "Polymers for Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery System: A Current
Status." Drug development and industrial pharmacy 34.11 (2008): 1246-66. Print.
21. 4. Dodou, Dimitra, Paul Breedveld, and Peter A. Wieringa. "Mucoadhesives in the
Gastrointestinal Tract:
23. 6. Jain, Shashank, et al., "Quality by Design Approach for Formulation, Evaluation
and Statistical Optimization of Diclofenac-Loaded Ethosomes via Transdermal
Route." Pharmaceutical development and technology 20.4 (2015): 473-89. Print.
24. 7. Jain, Shashank, et al., "Recent Advances in Lipid-Based Vesicles and Particulate
Carriers for Topical and Transdermal Application." Journal of pharmaceutical
sciences (2016) Print.
25. 8. Luo, Yangchao, et al., "Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Oral Drug Delivery: Chitosan
Coating Improves Stability, Controlled Delivery, Mucoadhesion and Cellular
Uptake." Carbohydrate Polymers 122 (2015): 221-9. Print.
27. 10. Brown, A.J. On an Acetic Ferment which form Cellulose. J. Chem. Soc. 1986, 49,
172–187. [CrossRef]
28. 11. Mohite, B.V.; Patil, S.V. A novel biomaterial: Bacterial cellulose and its new era
applications. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2014, 61, 101–110. [CrossRef]
29. 12. Czaja, W.K.; Young, D.J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R.M. The Future Prospects of
Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1–12.
[CrossRef]
31. 14. Lestari, P.; Elfrida, N.; Suryani, A.; Suryadi, Y. Study on the Production of
Bacterial Cellulose from Acetobacter Xylinum Using Agro—Waste. Jordan J. Biol.
Sci. 2014, 7, 75–80. [CrossRef]
32. 15. Saha, N.; Vyroubal, R.; Sáha, P. Apple Juice: An alternative feed-stock to
enhance the production of Bacterial Nano Cellulose. In Proceedings of the 2nd
International Symposium on Bacterial Nanocellulose, Gda ´nsk, Poland, 9–11
September 2015.
33. 16. Zandraa, O.; Saha, N.; Shimoga, G.D.; Palem, R.R.; Saha, P. Bacterial Cellulose,
an excellent biobased polymer produced from Apple, Book of Abstract Juice. In
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Modification, Degradation and
Stabilization of Polymers, Krakow, Poland, 4–8 September 2016.
34. 17. Bandopadhyay, S.; Saha, N.; Zandraa, O.; Saha, P. Bacterial cellulose from apple
juice—A polysaccharide based bioadditive for sustainable food packaging, Abstract
Book, 35–36. In Proceedings of the 5th EPNOE International Polysaccharide
Conference, Jena, Germany, 20–24 August 2017.
35. 18. MohammadKazemi, F.; Azin, M.; Ashori, A. Production of bacterial cellulose
using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 518–
523. [CrossRef]
36. 19. Gardner, J.D.; Oporto, S.G.; Mills, R.; Samir, A.S.A.M. Adhesion and surface
Issues in Cellulose and Nanaocellulose. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2008, 22, 545–567.
[CrossRef]
37. 20. Oner, E.T.; Hernández, L.; Combie, J. Review of Levan polysaccharide: From a
century of past experiences to future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 827–844.
[CrossRef]