Dane Gian Angelo Tan 3 .3.

2024
X – BOYLE
ENGLISH

A Historical Critique of Green Book: Jim Crow’s Law

While "Green Book" undeniably sparks conversations about the brutal realities of Jim
Crow segregation, the film's historical accuracy and narrative choices warrant critical
examination. Its portrayal of the era, though raising awareness about racial discrimination, risks
perpetuating harmful stereotypes and diminishing the broader struggle for Black agency.

The film centers around Dr. Don Shirley, a talented Black pianist navigating the segregated
South with the help of his white driver, Tony Vallelonga. However, a central critique lies in the
film's potential adherence to the "white savior" trope. By focusing heavily on Vallelonga's
personal transformation, the narrative risks overshadowing Dr. Shirley's experiences and
minimizing the agency of Black communities during the Civil Rights era.

Furthermore, concerns have been raised regarding historical inaccuracies and creative liberties
taken with the portrayal of Dr. Shirley and his relationship with Vallelonga. This raises questions
about the film's true representation of the past and its potential to mislead viewers about the
complexities of the era. Adding another layer of complexity are the concerns expressed by Dr.
Shirley's family. They argue that the film misrepresents their relationship and minimizes his
struggles. Engaging with diverse perspectives, including those of historians, scholars, and the
communities directly impacted by these events, is crucial to gain a more nuanced understanding
of the film's historical value.

In conclusion, while "Green Book" sheds light on a significant historical period, its historical
accuracy and its potential to perpetuate harmful stereotypes necessitate a critical perspective.
Examining the film through the lens of historical critique allows for a deeper understanding of its
strengths and limitations, fostering a more comprehensive and nuanced conversation about its
place in historical representation.