Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Modern Language Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to PMLA.
http://www.jstor.org
Yeats:Tragic
JoyandtheSublime
L forLonginus.3
IKE HIS MODERNIST contemporaries theticcounterpart
Schiller
cites"tragic art"as theaes-
oftheindividual's sublime en-
Eliot and Hulme,Yeatsrarelyusestheword counter withthespectacle ofchangeinnature and
sublime.His criticshavebeenall too willing history, changethat"destroys everything andcre-
to adopt his aversionto theterm,eventhoughhis atesitanew,anddestroys again"(210).Thisview
propheticand apocalypticlyricsof tragicjoy de- anticipates IrisMurdoch's contention thatthethe-
scend fromthe Romanticsublimeof Blake and ory of the sublimeapprehension of "formless
Shelley and even though his primaryaesthetic strength" is close indeedto beinga theoryof
categories-ecstasy,passion, terror,sprezzatura, tragedy (268).Itwouldbe morenearly accurate to
joy-descend fromthevocabularyofwriters on the saythatthetheory ofthesublime is closetobeing
sublimefromLonginusto Schopenhauer.1Yeats a theory of whatYeatscalls"tragicjoy,"forthe
continuallydrawson thisrhetoric-forexample, sublime transforms thepainful spectacle ofdestruc-
when he definesthe poet's "ecstasy" as arising tionand deathintoa joyfulassertion of human
"fromthecontemplation of thingsvasterthanthe freedom andtranscendence. Yeatsmostmemorably
individualand imperfectly seen," or whenhe rec- conjoinsthetragicandthesublime inhisdescrip-
ommendssymbolsin artas a means"to escapethe tionofShakespearean heroeswhoencounter their
barrennessand shallownessof a too consciousar- deathswithan ecstaticenlargement of vision,
rangement,"or, perhapsless obviously,whenhe "Heavenblazingintothehead;/Tragedy wrought
mythologizes lifeand historyas a turningbetween to itsuttermost" ("Lapis Lazuli" 294).Another
antitheticalterms(Autobiography 319;Essays 87). tragichero, Oedipus, isforYeatsa resonant emblem
Theoriesof the sublimecan help us interpret the oftragicjoy,as heisforLonginus anemblem ofthe
familyresemblancesamong Yeats'scontroversial sublime (478-79).In theintroduction toA Vision
lyricsaffirming deathand destruction: latepoems Yeatswrites thathisbookwill"proclaim a newdi-
such as "The Gyres"and "Lapis Lazuli," middle vinity": "He ragedagainsthissons,andthisrage
poems such as "The Second Coming" and "The wasnoble.. . . He knewnothing buthismind, and
Fascinationof What'sDifficult," and evenan early yetbecausehespokethatmindfatepossessed itand
poem, "The Valleyof theBlack Pig." By reading kingdoms changed according tohisblessing andhis
these poems synchronically in the lightof the cursing" (27-28).Theutterances ofYeats's Oedipus
poetics of the Romanticsublime,we can better exemplify therhetoricalviolence ofthesublime, a
understand thestructureand genealogyoftheiraf- violencethatI tracein Yeats'sfavorite sublime
fectivemovement fromterrortojoy (thepsycholog- modes-thecurse,theprophecy, and theapoca-
ical sublime) as well as their characteristically lypse.ButI beginbyattempting to determine the
violentfigures and fragmentary images(therhetor- affective basisforthisviolence.
163
I. TheAffective
Sublime gasp,"I seemneartodying," andHomer's terrified
sailors,"carried away from underdeath,butonly
"Tragic joy"expresses as wellas anyotherformu- just"(473).Thesublime strife between heroesand
lationinthehistory ofcriticism theemotive struc- gods,aspirants masters, goodformortals,
and is
tureand ambivalence of the sublime,sincethe butonlyifthemortals survive thethreatened an-
sublime involves theconversion ofaffects from de- nihilation (476). For Edmund Burke, too, "ideas of
featandterror to freedom andjoy.4A considera- pain, and above all of death," occasion the sublime
tionoftheprecedents forYeats'sevocative phrase (65).Oneofhismostprominent examples isDeath
revealsassumptions sharedbyvarioustheorists of itself, in Milton's allegory(59). Kant amends
thesublime. Inthefirst fulldiscussion ofthepsy- Burke's emphasis on terror by arguing that wemust
chological sublime, EdmundBurkecreates a com- be secureas wepicture toourselves dangerandde-
parableoxymoron: "delightful horror,whichisthe struction, buteventhen,theimaginary threat is so
mostgenuine effect,andtruest testofthesublime" great that we know "all resistance would be al-
(73).Schillerexplicatesthebinary affect:"Thefeel- together vain"(100).Itisourapparent security that
ingofthesublimeis a mixedfeeling. It is a com- allowsour fundamental insecurity to comeinto
positionof melancholy whichat its utmostis view.His notionofthefirst stepinthesublime as
manifested ina shudder, andofjoyousness which a defeatoftheimagination, a momentary check-
can mountto rapture. . . " (198). Thisremarkso ing,is a kindofmomentary death,theequivalent
closelyapproximates of
Yeats'sdescription tragic of Yeats's "Black out" in "Lapis Lazuli" and
ecstasy for
that,except thewordsublime, could it Wordsworth's "when the light ofsense/Goesout"
almostbethe work of hispen.Yeatswrites, forex- in The Prelude (1805, 6.534-35). For Freud,thisis
of in
ample,"thenobleness theartsis themingling the moment of over
anxiety castration intheoedi-
ofcontraries, theextremity ofsorrow, theextremity pal struggle; for Heidegger, the sudden callofcon-
of joy" (Essays 255). The sublimein Kantalso sciencethatdiscloses Dasein'sguiltandnullity-a
seems,as Schillerphrasesit, "twocontradictory callthat"comesfrommeand yetfrombeyondme"
perceptions ina singlefeeling" (198).ButKanttries (320). Formyinterpretation of thesublimeas a
tounpackthesynchronic affect a
along diachronic staged confrontation with death, I drawonthepsy-
axis,separating itintomoments ofdefeat andcoun- choanalytic accountsof Hertzand Weiskel, sup-
terassertion.Threatening objects"raisetheenergies plementing themwitha Heideggerian emphasis on
ofthesoul"anddiscover inusthe"courage tomea- theecstatic encounter withdeath.ButitisinYeats
sureourselves againsttheapparent almightiness of thatthesublime isexplicitly a stagedconfrontation
nature"(100-01).Yeats'spoemsoftragic joyoften withdeath:histragic heroes convey intheir finalut-
aimat couragein thefaceof Blakeannature-a terances "thesuddenenlargement oftheirvision,
universe ofdeaththatwouldtrapthemind.5 Yeats theirecstasyat theapproachof death"(Essays
remarks, muchlikeKant,that"onlythegreatest ob- 522-23).
staclethatcan be contemplated without despair Inthetemporal structure ofthesublime, thean-
rousesthewillto fullintensity" (Autobiography ticipation ofdeathgivesrisetoa counterassertion
132).In hissystem, Yeatsmythologizes thisobsta- oflife.Havingtornouthiseyesinhorror, Yeats's
cleas "theBody ofFate," butinhislyrics thefinal antithetical Oedipusreasserts himself witha rage
formofthereality principle is deathitself. that"seemed tocontain alllife"(Vision28).Inpsy-
In myview,deathprecipitates theemotional chological terms, the hero andthepoetsurmount
turningcalledthesublime, although theorists ofthe the threat of the destructive father through identifi-
sublime oftenrefer todeathbyothernames,orby cation with him.7 This oedipal dynamic is clear
whatKenneth Burketerms "deflections": nothing- and pervasive in Yeats's personal history, even
ness,castration, physicaldestruction, semiotic col- though Reveries over Childhood and Youth dis-
lapse,defeat bya precursor, andannihilation ofthe places the figure of aggression onto hisgrandfather
ego.6Deathis therecurrent obsessionforthese Pollexfen, a manwhomYeatsconfused withGod
from to
theorists, Longinus Heidegger and Bloom. and Lear, prayed to forpunishment, and emulated
Longinusoffers variousconceptsofthesublime, as a modelofcourage(Autobiography 3, 4, 22).
buthisexamples makeitclearthatdeathis hisor- Thispsychoanalytic modelof thesublimecan
ganizing trope-witness Sappho'sbroken-tongued helpus interpret theoverarching affective move-
Counterto therepetitiverevolutions
of thesun,the toocanhelpus interpret tragicjoyinYeats.'9 Twice
poet asserts his own unpredictableand violent inRichardIII, forexample, Shakespeare tellingly
energyof self-disclosure. misremembers QueenMargaret's earlier"proph-
The curseis a spontaneousoverflowof powerful ecies" as "curses"(3.4.15-18,5.1.25-27).James
feelings,but the feelingsdischargedbelong to Kugelremarks inhisanalysis ofHebraicprophecy:
Thanatos ratherthan to Eros. In the sectionof "theprophet's speechhadalways beenpowerful, ef-
"Meditationsin Time of CivilWar" entitled"My itcouldbesaidofhimwhatwassaidofthe
fective;
Descendants,"thepoetcurses,in an extraordinary soothsayer Balaamben Be'or,'thosewhomyou
act of anticipatory
vengeance,thehomeof hisoff- blessareblessed,and thosewhomyoucurseare
springif theyshoulddegenerate: cursed'(Num.22:6)" (81). As speechacts that
simultaneously announce andtransform theshape
May thislaboriousstairand thisstarktower of reality,
prophecy and the curseunitetheword
Become a rooflessruinthattheowl withdivineauthority, thetranscendental signifier.
May build in thecrackedmasonryand cry Butwhereas thecursemoreobviously altersworld
Her desolationto thedesolatesky. (203) andwordbydisfiguring them, thecentral difficulty
about propheticutterance, and about Yeats's
The passage offersa sublimeimageof fragmenta- propheticlyrics,istherelation between passivewit-
tion,butitpurchasesitssublimity witha symbolic nessand activetransformation. In thetropesof
act of self-destruction,
displaced metonymically Shelley's"Defenseof Poetry," a document that
ontothedescendants'tower.LikeLear,thepoetde- Yeatsquotesextensively and approvingly, is the
fineshisownpotencybywillingtheruinof hiskin, propheticpoet"mirror" or"legislator"? Intheim-
buthe attacksthembywayof thetotemictower- ageryofthesublime, is hethedefeated sonorthe
the veryemblemof the poet and of the book of violentfather?Therhetoric ofprophecy inevitably
poems to whichthiscursebelongs.The object of drawsonbothstrands offigure, hoping toturnthe
aggressionis thusa figurefortheself,muchas the interpreter
ofreality intoitscreator, justas thesub-
uncannyskyis forthe owl thatcriesto it."8An- limeconverts thepassivevictim intotheheroic ora-
otherof Yeats'sbirdswithan uncannyshadowself tor."LapisLazuli"and"TheGyres"prophetically
leaps intotheskyin "NineteenHundredand Nine- envisiona brutaland violentworld;but they
teen,"prefiguringapocalypticcompletionand stir- attempt to altertheprophet's relation to vision,
ringthepoet to cursehis own work: changing elegiacsubmission intoactivecelebration.
Weshouldbecareful aboutequating Yeatswithone
That imagecan bringwildness,bringa rage
poleofprophecy or theother:insofar as hispro-
To end all things,to end
What mylaboriouslifeimagined,even
pheticlyrics
oftragic joyaresublime andnotfanat-
The half-imagined, thehalf-written
page. ical,theyinhabit thepsychic andrhetorical space
(209) ofbothwitness andlegislator. Thepoeticactivity
ofthesepoemsis "theshooting ofthegulf"-as
Writingis a veilbetweenthepoet and integration Emerson defines "power"-between spectatorship
withthe finalformof reality-death.The act of andcreation, whicharebothessential toprophecy
cursinghisownworkassimilates thepoetto thede- (271).Without thedefeated sonthere canbenofa-
structive"winds of winter,"windsthaterasethe ther;without thewitness, no legislator; andwith-
word and the world (209). Attempting to evade outtheelegist, no RockyFace.
death,thepoetidentifieswithit.The transcenden- Kantwarns,however, thatthesublimemaybe-
tal impulseof thesublimeis ultimatelyapocalyp- comefanaticism ifonegoes"madwithreason"or,
tic and self-destructive-arage not only against in thetermsof Freud'sGroupPsychologyand the
orderbut also againsttheselfand language. AnalysisoftheEgo, ifone allowstheheroicfather
orpolitician
toreplace
thesuperego (Kant116).We
IV. Prophecy,Apocalypse,and thePolitics havealreadyseenthatYeats'slyric
transformations
of the Sublime ofthecurseapproachsuchan extreme. Otherlate
lyricscomedangerously closeto celebratingthe
Anothermodalityof thesublime,prophecyhas fanaticismofcompleteidentificationwiththefa-
longbeenthoughtto be relatedto thecurse,and it therand destructiveness,
such as the canceled
Notes
1Harold Bloom alone invokesthesublimeto interpret Yeats. to thepositionI elaboratehere:thatthe"daemonicor Sublime
But he restrictshimselfto the sublimeof influenceand, even is thusmerelyanotherevasionof theunacceptablenecessity of
while celebratingthe transcendenceof the human in earlier dying"(Poetry209). Yeats'srelationship withBlake and Shel-
Romantics,condemnsas inhumanethelyricsthatseemto me leyis theprimarysubjectof Adams's Blake and Yeats,Born-
to manifesttheYeatsiansublime.Comparehisresponseto what stein'sYeatsand Shelley,and Bloom's Yeats.
hecallsYeats's"[i]nhumane nonsense"(Yeats438)withhispraise 2 Much workhas been done to synthesize thesublime,rang-
forThomasWeiskel'sassertion:"theessentialclaimof thesub- ingfromMonk'sclassic,TheSublime,to Weiskel3-33. Forthe
limeis thatmancan,in feelingand in speech,transcend thehu- similarities
betweenLonginusand EdmundBurkeon thesub-
man. A humanisticsublimeis an oxymoron"(Bloom, lime,see Fry,Reach 60-61. In thisessayI drawon Fry'sdiscus-
Forewordvii;Weiskel3). In a lateressayon Yeats,Bloomrevises sion, whichassimilatesKant's mathematicaland dynamical
hisnegativeviewof theYeatsiansublimebutrefers dismissively sublimeto Longinus'sversion;on Weiskel'ssynthesis;and on
Hertz's interreadingof Longinus, Burke,Kant, and Freud 14 See Essays 288. On eternal or ewige Wieder-
recurrence,
("Notion"). kehr,in Yeatsand Nietzsche,see Bohlmann57-68. For another
3 More recentcriticshaveunnecessarily compartmentalized generaldiscussionof Yeats'sdebtto Nietzsche,see Oppel.
the theoriesof tragedyand the sublime.The sublimeis not a 15 AlthoughtheolderYeatswas fondof suchwordsand such
genre,and itstheoristsare happyto emphasizeitsfluidmove- soundsin general,theyconvergein a numerically higherquan-
mentacrossgenericboundaries.Nevertheless, thesublimehas tityat theendsofhislatersublimelyricsthantheydo elsewhere.
an affective structureand a rhetoric-amongthequalitiesthat Theybothintensify and surpassthegeneralstylistic freedomof
definegenre-and so it mightbe thoughtof as an extended hisverseinthisperiod.The characteristic variations inmeter-as
mode,relatedin turnto othermodes,such as theapocalyptic in stanzaand rhyme-havebeenamplydescribedbycriticsfrom
and the curse(fora discussionof mode, see Fowler106-07). Gross(48-55) to Parkinson(182-91)and Doughertyand need
Engelberg(166-77), Reid, and Patridesrelate"tragicjoy" to not be rehearsedhere.
tragedy, as does Yeatshimself.Forthecounterassociation ofthe 16 Shelleyaddressesthewindwiththeapostrophe"O Uncon-
sublimewiththecomic,see Shapiro'scommentson Hegel and trollable!"in the "Ode to theWestWind," line47.
Marx (225-26) and Modiano's genealogyof thecomicsublime 17 Remaking himself,Yeatssimultaneously converts twoanti-
(231-39). sublimepoetsintoprecursors of hissublimity. In 'An Essayon
4 For an analysis of the ambivalenceof the sublime,see Criticism," Pope grudgingly allowsforthewaywardness ofPega-
Fletcher243-52. susand thensuggeststhatthereis a semisublimity or "Gracebe-
5 Bloom acknowledgesYeats'sresistance to thedeathof the yondtheReach of Art" (lines 150-55). Further, Yeats'sverbal
"object-world"; itmakesYeatspossiblyone ofthelast"Sublime" pileupechoesBen Jonson'ssatiric"Ode to Himself":"Run on,
poets (Poetry209). Bornsteinalso bringsout thisantinatural- and rage,sweat,censure,and condemn. . . thoughthynerves
ism in Yeats'svisionarypoems (Transformations 27-30). be shrunk,and blood be cold . . . thystrain. "(lines 9-10,
6 Kenneth Burke's"thesaurus"ofthenecessary"deflections" 45, 49).
of deathdiffers frommine(cf.Burke369). Nothingitself,death 18 On the relationof uncannydoublingto the sublime,see
exemplifies and exaggerates thehiddenmetonymical structure Fry,"Possession" 196-201.
of thesublime,and indeedof all naming,because deathmust 19On Yeatsand prophecy,see Stallworthy. Whitakeroffers
inevitablyundergotranslation.A literal-minded readingof thebestanalysisof theapocalypsein Yeats,emphasizingitsin-
Yeats'smythof theafterlife would,of course,annultheimpor- ternaland alchemicalnature(34-54).
tanceofdeathinanyoftheseforms, butitwouldalso be incapa- 20 For a discussionof thepairsin "Two Songs froma Play,"
ble of explaininghislyrics'moreambivalentrepresentation of see Ellmann260-63;on miniaturization and binarism, see Levi-
deathas an occasion forcourage. Strauss,The Savage Mind 16-33.
7 On the oedipal or preoedipalnatureof the sublime,see 21 Whiteuses the regulative aestheticcategoriesof the sub-
Hertz,"Reading,"and Weiskel91-106.For myanalysisof the lime and the beautifulto analyze the disciplineof history
interrelation betweenoedipalidentificationandaggression, I also (125-37).
borrowfromLacan (Speech 79; Ecrits8-29). 22 For an overview of Yeats'sthoughton war,see Farag.For
8 Guerlac'sversionof Longinussometimes approachessuch Bloom'spositionon Yeats'sviolence,see,forexample,theread-
a view,thoughheranalysisis generally Withthehelp
insightful. ingsof "The SecondComing,""Lapis Lazuli,"and "The Gyres"
ofthelaterHeidegger, Guerlacarguesagainsttheaffective theory in Yeats.
of thesublimebecause "feeling"obscuresthethreatof therhe- 23 Yeatssuppressesthisside of Shelleywhenhe derideshim
toricalsublimeto thesubject'sself-identity.
ButHeidegger's anal- forbeing"terrified of theLast Day likea Victorianchild" (Es-
ysis of the intersubjective basis of Stimmung'mood,' and says 420).
especiallyofMitbefindlichkeit 'co-state-of-mind,'
preserves the 24 I do notwish,however, to exaggerate thepoliticalflexibil-
affective sublimewithoutendorsingan ideologicalconceptof ityof thesublime.The sexualpoliticsof thesublimehas tradi-
the self. tionallybeenantifeminist, and westillneeda fullfeminist review
9 Whitakerdescribesthesetwomomentsin theearlyapoca- ofthesublimeas theviolentagon of fatherand son or as a mas-
lypticromancesas thepsychicannihilationof "Rosa Alchem- culinewarwithdanger.Forthesereasons,as wellas forpacifist
ica" and the complementary inflationof "The Tables of the concerns,we may ultimatelydecide to rejectthe sublimeal-
Law,"theself-negating Christand theself-assertingLucifer(44). together, as long as we do so consistently. But,in myview,we
10As BrendaWebsterarguesof Yeats'sbirdand sword,the mightalso attemptto constructa versionof the sublimethat
concentrated imagemaybe thoughtof as a "talismanicobject," would be compatible with certain formsof revolutionary
a "defenseagainstfearsof nothingness and loss of individual- feminism.
ity"(207). It mayalso be likenedto Hertz'smomentof "figura- 25 See Lewis 184-235. Douglas RobinsoncriticizesLewis's
tive reconstitution"in the sublime after the moment of distinction butgoes on to arguethattheAugustinian, spiritual
"disintegration" ("Reading" 14). viewis "suitedto politicalconservatives" as against"implicitly
11Hillis Millerreadsthe figurative movementof "Nineteen revolutionary predictiveinterpretations"-anassertionthat
Hundredand Nineteen"as a violentrevolving withoutcenter wouldseemto be contradicted byrecentfundamentalism in the
(347). UnitedStates.See Robinson'shelpfulintroductory analysis(17).
12 Weiskeluses thephraseon and on to describethemathe- 26 My thanksgo to RichardFinneran,Paul Fry,Thomas
maticalsublime(22). Whitaker, and GeorgeWrightfortheirvaluablecommentson
13 For an elaborationof Yeats'scentralaesthetictenetson the earlierdraftsof thisessay.
basis of thispassage,see Vendler28.
WorksCited
Adams, Hazard. Blake and Yeats:The ContraryVision.1955. Grossman,Allen.PoeticKnowledgeintheEarlyYeats:A Study
New York:Russell,1968. ofThe WindamongtheReeds.Charlottesville: UP of Vir-
Auden,W. H. CollectedPoems. Ed. EdwardMendelson.New ginia, 1969.
York:Random, 1976. Guerlac,Suzanne."Longinusand theSubjectof theSublime."
Blake, William. The CompletePoetryand Prose of William New LiteraryHistory16 (1985): 275-89.
Blake. Ed. David V. Erdman.Rev.ed. NewYork:Anchor- Hartman,Geoffrey. SavingtheText:Literature/Derrida/Philos-
Doubleday,1982. ophy.Baltimore:JohnsHopkins UP, 1981.
Bloom, Harold. Foreword.Weiskelvii-x. Heidegger, Martin.Beingand Time.Trans.JohnMacquarrieand
. Poetryand Repression:Revisionismfrom Blake to EdwardRobinson.Oxford:Blackwell,1980.
Stevens.New Haven: Yale UP, 1976. Hertz,Neil. "The Notionof Blockagein theLiteratureof the
. Yeats.New York:OxfordUP, 1970. Sublime."Psychoanalysis and theQuestionoftheText.Ed.
Bohlmann,Otto. Yeatsand Nietzsche.London: Macmillan, Geoffrey Hartman.Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUP, 1978.
1982. 62-85.
Bornstein,George.Transformations ofRomanticismin Yeats, . 'A Readingof Longinus."TheEnd oftheLine: Essays
Eliot, and Stevens.Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976. on Psychoanalysisand theSublime.NewYork:Columbia
. Yeatsand Shelley.Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1970. UP, 1985. 1-20.
Burke,Edmund.A PhilosophicalInquiryintotheOriginofOur Hoagwood, TerenceAllan. Prophecyand the Philosophyof
Ideas oftheSublimeand theBeautiful.Ed. JamesT. Boul- Mind: Traditions ofBlakeand Shelley.University:
U ofAl-
ton. London: Routledge,1958. abama P, 1985.
Burke,Kenneth."ThanatopsisforCritics:A BriefThesaurus Horace."The Artof Poetry."Trans.WalterJacksonBate.Criti-
of Deaths and Dyings." Essays in Criticism2 (1952): cism: TheMajor Texts.Ed. Bate. 2nd ed. New York:Har-
369-75. court,1970. 51-58.
Castiglione,Baldassare. The Book of the Courtier.Trans. Jonson,Ben. Ben Jonson:The CompletePoems. Ed. George
Thomas Hoby. 1561.London: Dent, 1975. Parfitt.1975.New Haven: Yale UP, 1982.
Cullingford, Elizabeth. Yeats,Irelandand Fascism.New York: Kant,Emmanuel.CritiqueofJudgment. Trans.J.H. Bernard.
New YorkUP, 1981. London: Hafner-Macmillan, 1951.
Derrida,Jacques."Of an ApocalypticToneRecentlyAdopted Kenner,Hugh. A ColderEye. New York:Penguin,1983.
in Philosophy."Trans.JohnP. Leavey,Jr.Semeia23 (1982): Kugel,JamesL. "TwoIntroductions to Midrash."Midrashand
63-97. Literature.Ed. GeoffreyHartmanand SanfordBudick.
Dougherty, Adelyn.A StudyofRhythmic Structurein the Verse New Haven: Yale UP, 1986.77-103.
of WilliamButlerYeats.The Hague: Mouton, 1973. Lacan, Jacques.Ecrits.Trans.Alan Sheridan.New York:Nor-
Ellmann,Richard.TheIdentity of Yeats.2nded. NewYork:Ox- ton, 1977.
fordUP, 1964. . Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis.Trans.An-
Emerson,RalphWaldo.Essaysand Lectures.NewYork:Library thonyWilden.Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUP, 1968.
of America,1983. Levi-Strauss,Claude. TheSavageMind.Trans.GeorgeWeiden-
Engelberg,Edward. The VastDesign:Patternsin W B. Yeats's feldand Nicolson Ltd. London: Weidenfeld,1966.
Aesthetic.Toronto:U of TorontoP, 1963. . "The StructuralStudyof Myth." The Structuralists:
Farag,Fahmy."NeedlessHorrororTerrible Beauty:Yeats'sIdeas FromMarxtoLevi-Strauss. Ed. RichardDeGeorgeand Fer-
of Hatred,War,and Violence." The Opposing Virtues. nande DeGeorge. New York: Anchor-Doubleday,1970.
Dublin: Dolmen, 1978.7-19. 169-94.
Fletcher,Angus.Allegory:The Theoryof a SymbolicMode. Lewis,R. W. B. "Days of Wrathand Laughter."Trialsof the
Ithaca: CornellUP, 1964. Word.New Haven: Yale UP, 1965. 184-235.
Fowler, Alastair.KindsofLiterature:An Introduction totheThe- Longinus.On Sublimity. Trans.D. A. Russell.AncientLiterary
oryof Genresand Modes. Cambridge:HarvardUP, 1982. Criticism:The Principal Textsin New Translations.Ed.
Freud,Sigmund.BeyondthePleasurePrinciple.StandardEdi- D. A. Russelland M. Winterbottom. Oxford:Clarendon,
tion 18: 3-64. 1972.460-503.
. GroupPsychologyand theAnalysisof theEgo. Stan- Miller,J.Hillis. The LinguisticMoment.Princeton:Princeton
dard Edition 18: 65-143. UP, 1985.
. "Mourningand Melancholia." StandardEdition 14: Modiano, Raimonda. "Humanism and the Comic Sublime:
243-58. From Kant to FriedrichTheodor Vischer."Studies in
. The StandardEditionof theCompletePsychological Romanticism26 (1987): 231-44.
WorksofSigmundFreud.24 vols.Ed. JamesStrachey. Lon- Monk,SamuelHolt. 'A GracebeyondtheReachofArt."Jour-
don: Hogarth,1953-74. nal of theHistoryof Ideas 5.2 (1944): 131-50.
Fry,Paul H. "The PossessionoftheSublime."StudiesinRoman- . The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in
ticism26 (1987): 187-207. Eighteenth-Century England. 1935. Ann Arbor: U of
. The Reach of Criticism.New Haven: Yale UP, 1983. MichiganP, 1960.
Gross,Harvey.Sound and ForminModernPoetry:A Studyof Murdoch,Iris."The Sublimeand theBeautifulRevisited."Yale
ProsodyfromThomasHardyto RobertLowell. Ann Ar- Review49 (1959-60): 247-71.
bor: U of MichiganP, 1964.