Rescissionofcontract

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/351286177
Rescission of Contract
Article · May 2021
CITATIONS READS
0 13,630
1 author:
Elbe Peter
Government Dental College, Thrissur
50 PUBLICATIONS 377 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Elbe Peter on 03 May 2021.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

5/3/2021 Rescission of contract
Law Articles SEARCH
Rescission of contract
In contract law, rescission has been defined as the unmaking of a contract between parties. Rescission is the
unwinding of a transaction. This is done to bring the parties, as far as possible, back to the position in which they
were before they entered into a contract (the status quo ante
Author Name: elbepeter
In contract law, rescission has been de ned as the unmaking of

a contract between parties. Rescission is the unwinding of a
transaction. This is done to bring the parties, as far as possible,
back to the position in which they were before they entered into
a contract (the status quo ante
Top
www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1696/Rescission-of-contract.html 1/13
In contract law, rescission has been defined as the unmaking of a contract between parties.
Rescission is the unwinding of a transaction. This is done to bring the parties, as far as possible,
back to the position in which they were before they entered into a contract (the status quo
ante.
Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. A court may decline to rescind a

contract if one party has affirmed the contract by his action 1 or a third party has acquired
some rights or there has been substantial performance in implementing the contract.
Furthermore, because rescission is supposed to be imposed mutually upon both sides to a
contract, the party seeking rescission normally must offer to give back all benefits he or she has
received under the contract (an "offer of tender")
The injured party may rescind the contract by giving notice to the representor. However, this is
not always necessary as any act indicating repudiation, eg notifying the authorities, may suffice.
(Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell) 2
Alternate terms
Virginia uses the term "cancellation" for equitable rescission. Furthermore, a minority of
common law jurisdictions, like South Africa, use the term "rescission" for what other
jurisdictions call "reversing", "overturning" or "overruling" a court judgment. In this sense, the
term means to be set aside or made void, on application to the court that granted the
judgment or a higher court. Applications to rescind a judgment are usually made on the basis
of error or for good cause.
Most common law jurisdictions avoid all this confusion by holding that one rescinds a contract
and cancels a deed (i.e. of real property), and treat rescission as a contractual remedy rather
than a type of procedural remedy against a court judgment.
The right to rescind a contract seems to suppose not that the contract has existed only in
appearance; but that it has never had a real existence on account of the defects which
accompanied it; or which prevented its actual execution.
A contract cannot, in general, be rescinded by one party unless both parties can be placed in
the same situation, and can stand upon the same terms as existed when the contract was
made. The most obvious instance of this rule is, where one party by taking possession, etc., has
received a partial benefit from the contract.
Top
A contract cannot be rescinded in part. It would be unjust to destroy a contract in toto, 3 when
one of the parties has derived a partial benefit by a performance of the agreement In such
one of the parties has derived a partial benefit, by a performance of the agreement. In such
case it seems to have been the practice formerly to allow the vendor to recover the stipulated
price, and the vendee to recover, by a cross-action, damages for the breach of the contract. But
according to the later and more convenient practice, the vendee, in such case, is allowed in an
action for the price, to give evidence of the inferiority of the goods in reduction of damages,
and the plaintiff who has broken his contract is not entitled to recover more than the value of
the benefit the defendant has actually derived from the goods or labor; and when the latter
has derived no benefit, the plaintiff cannot recover at all. A sale of land, by making a deed for
the same, and receiving security for the purchase money, may be rescinded before the deed
has been recorded, by the purchaser surrendering the property and, the deed to the buyer,
and receiving from him the securities he had given; in Pennsylvania, these acts revest the title
in the original owner. But this appears contrary to the current of decisions in other states and
in England
The Speci c relief Act - 1963

Sections 27 to 30 of specific relief act4 deals with rescission of contract. Specific relief is a form
of judicial redress belongs to the law of procedure and is a body of written law arranged
according to the natural affinities of the subject matter. In India the Specific relief act of 1963
was enacted by the parliament in the 14th year of republic.
According to section 27 of Specific Relief Act - When rescission may be adjudged or refused.
When rescission may be adjudged or refused.-(1) Any person interested in a contract may sue
to have it rescinded, and such rescission may be adjudged by the court in any of the following
cases, namely:-
(a) where the contract is voidable or terminable by the plaintiff;
(b) where the contract is unlawful for causes not apparent on its face and the defendant is
more to blame than the plaintiff.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the court may refuse to rescind the
contract-
(a) where the plaintiff has expressly or impliedly ratified the contract; or
(b) where, owing to the change of circumstances which has taken place since the making of the
contract (not being due to any act of the defendant himself), the parties cannot be substantially
restored to the position in which they stood when the contract was made; or
(c) where third parties have, during the subsistence of the contract, acquired rights in good Top
faith without notice and for value; or
(d) where only a part of the contract is sought to be rescinded and such part is not severable
(d) where only a part of the contract is sought to be rescinded and such part is not severable
from the rest of the contract.
Explanation.-In this section "contract", in relation to the territories to which the Transfer of
Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), does not extend, means a contract in writing.
any per son interested in a contract – the remedy by way of rescission is not confined to
persons named as parties to a contract, it is open to any person who though not named as a
party to a contract, is interested in the contract. Thus any member of a joint Hindu family is
entitled to rescind a contract entered into by the manager where by the former would be
defrauded.
There is a rule of equity that where a conveyance has been excecuted it will be set aside only
on the ground of actual fraud, and not for mere innocent misrepresentation. (wilde v. Gibson)5
Section 28 - Rescission in certain circumstances of contracts for the sale or lease of immovable
property, the specific performance of which has been decreed.
Rescission in certain circumstances of contracts for the sale or lease of immovable property,
the specific performance of which has been decreed.- (1) Where in any suit a decree for specific
performance of a contract for the sale or lease of immovable property has been made and the
purchaser or lessee does not, within the period allowed by the decree or such further period as
the court may allow, pay the purchase money or other sum which the court has ordered him to
pay, the vendor or lessor may apply in the same suit in which the decree is made, to have the
contract rescinded and on such application the court may, by order, rescind the contract either
so far as regards the party in default or altogether, as the justice of the case may require.
(2) Where a contract is rescinded under sub-section (1), the court-

(a) shall direct the purchaser or the lessee, if he has obtained possession of the property under
the contract, to restore such possession to the vendor or lessor, and
(b) may direct payment to the vendor or lessor of all the rents and profits which have accrued
in respect of the property from the date on which possession was so obtained by the purchaser
or lessee until restoration of possession to the vendor or lessor, and, if the justice of the case
so requires, the refund of any sum paid by the vendee or lessee as earnest money or deposit in
connection with the contract.
(3) If the purchaser or lessee pays the purchase money or other sum which he is ordered to pay
under the decree within the period referred to in sub-section (1), the court may, on application
made in the same suit, award the purchaser or lessee such further relief as he may be entitled Top
to, including in appropriate cases all or any of the following reliefs, namely:-
(a) the execution of a proper conveyance or lease by the vendor or lessor;
(b) the delivery of possession, or partition and separate possession, of the property on the
execution of such conveyance or lease.
(4) No separate suit in respect of any relief which may be claimed under this section shall lie at
the instance of a vendor, purchaser, lessor or lessee, as the case may be.
(5) The costs of any proceedings under this section shall be in the discretion of the court.
Section 29 -Alternative prayer for rescission in suit for speci c

performance
Alternative prayer for rescission in suit for specific performance.- A plaintiff instituting a suit for
the specific performance of a contract in writing may pray in the alternative that, if the contract
cannot be specifically enforced, it may be rescinded and delivered up to be cancelled; and the
court, if it refuses to enforce the contract specifically, may direct it to be rescinded and
delivered up accordingly.
A party suing for specific performance may in the alternative sue for rescission of the contract
but the converse is not true and a person suing for rescission cannot in the alternative sue for
specific performance. Prem Raj v. D L F H Co. Ltd 6
Section 30. Court may require parties rescinding to do equity

Court may require parties rescinding to do equity.- On adjudging the rescission of a contract,
the court may require the party to whom such relief is granted to restore, so far as may be, any
benefit which he may have received from the other party and to make any compensation to
him which justice may require.
Benefit and compensation – This section is in accord with English equitable rules, whereby if
rescission is to be granted both parties must be restored to the status quo ante. If a purchaser
seeks rescission, a court of equity can take account of any profit he has made and make
allowances for any deterioration in the property.
Onus – A party claiming restoration of benefit received must prove the value of that benefit.
Govindram v. Edward Radbone 7
Top
BARS TO RESCISSION
R i i i it bl d
www.legalservicesindia.com/article/1696/Rescission-of-contract.html
di d d t th di ti f th t Th i j d 5/13
Rescission is an equitable remedy and is awarded at the discretion of the court. The injured
party may lose the right to rescind in the following four circumstances:
(i) AFFIRMATION OF THE CONTRACT

The injured party will affirm the contract if, with full knowledge of the misrepresentation and of
their right to rescind, they expressly state that they intend to continue with the contract, or if
they do an act from which the intention may be implied. (Long v Lloyd)8
Note that in Peyman v Lanjani9, the Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff had not lost his right
to rescind because, knowing of the facts which afforded this right, he proceeded with the
contract, unless he also knew of the right to rescind. The plaintiff here did not know he had
such right. As he did not know he had such right, he could not be said to have elected to affirm
the contract.
(ii) LAPSE OF TIME

If the injured party does not take action to rescind within a reasonable time, the right will be
lost.
Where the misrepresentation is fraudulent, time runs from the time when the fraud was, or
with reasonable diligence could have been discovered. In the case of non-fraudulent
misrepresentation, time runs from the date of the contract, not the date of discovery of the
misrepresentation.
Leaf v International Galleries10
(iii) RESTITUTION IN INTEGRUM IMPOSSIBLE

The injured party will lose the right to rescind if substantial restoration is impossible, ie if the
parties cannot be restored to their original position. Vigers v Pike11
Precise restoration is not required and the remedy is still available if substantial restoration is
possible. Thus, deterioration in the value or condition of property is not a bar to rescission.
Armstrong v Jackson 12
(iv) THIRD PARTY ACQUIRES RIGHTS

If a third party acquires rights in property, in good faith and for value, the misrepresentee will
lose their right to rescind (Phillips v Brooks)13 under Mistake.
Thus, if A obtains goods from B by misrepresentation and sells them to C, who takes in good
faith, B cannot later rescind when he discovers the misrepresentation in order to recover the Top
goods from C.
Note:
The right to rescind the contract will also be lost if the court exercises its discretion to award
damages in lieu of rescission under s2(2) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967.
For innocent misrepresentation two previous bars to rescission were removed by s1 of the
Misrepresentation Act 1967: the misrepresentee can rescind despite the misrepresentation
becoming a term of the contract (s1(a)), and the misrepresentee can rescind even if the
contract has been executed (s1(b)). Generally, this will be relevant to contracts for the sale of
land and to tenancies.
INDEMNITY
An order of rescission may be accompanied by the court ordering an indemnity. This is a
money payment by the misrepresentor in respect of expenses necessarily created in complying
with the terms of the contract and is different from damages. ( Whittington v Seale-Hayne)14
Conclusion
Rescission of a contract is remedy offered for a contract if entered in by misrepresentation,
mutual rescission is possible only if both the parties can be restored to the original position
before the entry in to contract.
*************
Table of cases
1) Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR 753
2) Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525
3) Sheffield Nickel co V. Unwin 2 QBD 214 – 223
4) Wilde v. Gibson (1848) 1 HLC – 605 approved in Gramani v. Ramachandran 1953 A.M 769.
5) Prem Raj v. D L F H Co Ltd (1968) A.SC 1355
6) Govindram v. Edward Radbone (1947) 74 IA 295
7) Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR 753.
8) Peyman v Lanjani [1985] Ch 457
9) Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86.
10) Vigers v Pike (1842) 8 CI&F 562.
11) Armstrong v Jackson [1917] 2 KB 822.
12) Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243
13) Whittington v. Seale-Hayne (1900) 82 LT 49.
Bibliography
1) Pollock and Mulla on Indian contract and Specific Relief acts 10 th edn – 1044-48
Top
2) Avtar Singh – Principles of Mercantile law

2) Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525
3) ibi
4) Pollock and Mulla on Indian contract and Specific Relief acts 10 th edn – 1044-48
5) Wilde v. Gibson (1848) 1 HLC – 605 approved in Gramani v. Ramachandran 1953 A.M 769
6) Prem Raj v. D L F H Co Ltd (1968) A.SC 1355
7) Govindram v. Edward Radbone (1947) 74 IA 295
9) Peyman v Lanjani [1985] Ch 457
10) Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86.
11) Vigers v Pike (1842) 8 CI&F 562
12) Armstrong v Jackson [1917] 2 KB 822
13) Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243
14) Whittington v. Seale-Hayne (1900) 82 LT 49
Authored by: Dr Elbe Peter, MDS, LL.B, Dip.Clin.Res / The author can be reached at:
elbepeter@legalserviceindia.com
ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3

Print this Article
Author Bio: Dr Elbe Peter, MDS, LL.B, DCR. orthodontist kerala
Email: elbepeter@legalserviceindia.com Website: http://www.legalserviceindia.com

Views: 23612
Comments :
How To Submit Your Article:
Top
Follow the Procedure Below To Submit Your Articles

Submit your Article by using our online form Click here
Note* we only accept Original Articles, we will not accept Articles Already
Published in other websites.
For Further Details Contact: editor@legalserviceindia.com
File Your Copyright - Right Now!
Online Copyright Registration in India

Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at: admin@legalserviceindia.com
Top
File Divorce in Delhi - Right Now!

File Your Mutual Divorce -
Call us Right Now at: 9650499965 / or email at: tapsash@gmail.com
Lawyers in India - Search By City
Delhi Mumbai Kolkata Chennai

Chandigarh Pune Siliguri Chandigarh
Allahabad Nagpur Durgapur Hyderabad
Lucknow Nashik Janjgir Coimbatore
Noida Ahmedabad Jaipur Eluru
Gurgaon Surat Ludhiana Belgaum
Faridabad Indore Dimapur Cochin
Jalandhar Agra Guwahati Rajkot
Vapi Jalgaon Amritsar Jodhpur
436 Comments Sort by Oldest
Add a comment...
Kartik Bagchi
The Union Cabinet is all poised to table an amendment to the marriage laws, which, in the event of a divorce,
would give the wife an equal share of not only the property acquired by the husband during or before the
marriage, but also his inherited or inheritable property. This proposed amendment is already creating a furore.
Like · Reply · 22 · 7y
Top
Mallikarjuna Sharma
Th t i it i l S lf i d t b di d f t ill i th t bli h d l
That is quite insane proposal. Self-acquired property can be disposed of at will - is the established law
and this contradicts it. Even if elements of social or public interest are there, those should not totally
drown the established law. The maintenance provisions should be made more stringent and adequate
by reform but not such divesting of property for a song.
Veeraswami Panjan
Mallikarjuna Sharma It is not divesting of property for a song Sharmaji, when two join in wedlock, they
flurish and family become established. This society was men dominated, is being men dominated and I
feel bad and continue to be men dominated. Hence, to safeguard the interest of women folk who have
to face so many illtreatment are protected through this historic measure. Why not we support.
Lakshmirajyam Jonnalagadda
Execute documents of all the property in the name of your beloved wife and then you will face the
music. men are the strong enemeies of the men and idiotically they see cruelity in men and the regular
and continuous female mess in houses which lead to the disastrous state of affairs for the men folk and
it has become a regular irony and more than 90% of women who seek divorce recite the stupid stanza
that their live is full of thorns and many impedements espeically after marriage as if their life at their
parental houses ran on golden carpet. Present day should be taken into consideration to ascertain
present day oproblems and the days of great great grand fathers or the inception times of this Kali
Yuga.
Show 9 more replies in this thread
Tukaram Gaude
hi
Brijesh Mithaulia
Jenny Kay : Thank you Rose Sarah. I am Brijesh Kumar Mithaulia from India. I am in similar situation
today, only genders have changed. I have contacted father Dr Jude and has asked me for some
details. Will send him shortly.
Like · Reply · 5 · 1y Top
Brijesh Mithaulia
Brijesh Mithaulia
Its such a coincidence that I found your blog.
Patipol Chokchainant
How to invest in bitcoin cloud mining is pretty simple, do the math on what you can afford to invest and
then go with a reputable cloud mining operation that is in your price range. I am actually invested in
three at this moment, and together they net me a daily income of 400 dollar. I mine Bitcoin and altcoins,
and so I am able to make a decent income that doesn't rely on one single income stream as with solo
mining.
I have listed some of the best websites for Bitcoin mining. Visit: 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲.𝗻𝗲𝘁
Like · Reply · 1 · 2w
Angel Vijayvidya
Can anyone help me.i am suffering from dowry harassment.i am mentally have depressed from my husband.
Indraa Kaur Ahluwalia Nandi

sure dear. You just go to police station and post a case with article No. 498.
Like · Reply · 7y
Indraa Kaur Ahluwalia Nandi

or just contact with any of political leader,NGO OR LAWYER.
Like · Reply · 7y
Nilesh Pawar
Go to Police Station and file Section 498A of IPC
if getting Physical harrasment you can file Domestice Violence in the appropriate Court and get
Protection from Husand & relatives of husband
Show 10 more replies in this thread
Anita Rao
India being democratic country and having protective laws for women , its high time to have special courts for Top
women to try cases exclusively women cases only...........
View publication stats
Partha Sengupta
thats is not at all a solution, more and more courts, more and more laws.... sorry it won't work
Sharon Chatterjee
woman courts is no solution it fact we need capable judges who are not appointed politically
Aparna Singh
Top

Rescissionofcontract

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rescissionofcontract

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Article · May 2021

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Law Articles SEARCH

Author Name: elbepeter

In contract law, rescission has been de ned as the unmaking of

Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. A court may decline to rescind a

The Speci c relief Act - 1963

(2) Where a contract is rescinded under sub-section (1), the court-

(a) the execution of a proper conveyance or lease by the vendor or lessor;

Section 29 -Alternative prayer for rescission in suit for speci c

Section 30. Court may require parties rescinding to do equity

(i) AFFIRMATION OF THE CONTRACT

(ii) LAPSE OF TIME

Leaf v International Galleries10

(iii) RESTITUTION IN INTEGRUM IMPOSSIBLE

(iv) THIRD PARTY ACQUIRES RIGHTS

1) Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR 753

ISBN No: 978-81-928510-1-3

Author Bio: Dr Elbe Peter, MDS, LL.B, DCR. orthodontist kerala

Email: elbepeter@legalserviceindia.com Website: http://www.legalserviceindia.com

How To Submit Your Article:

Follow the Procedure Below To Submit Your Articles

File Your Copyright - Right Now!

Online Copyright Registration in India

File Divorce in Delhi - Right Now!

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Delhi Mumbai Kolkata Chennai

436 Comments Sort by Oldest

Show 9 more replies in this thread

Indraa Kaur Ahluwalia Nandi

Indraa Kaur Ahluwalia Nandi

Show 10 more replies in this thread

5/3/2021 Rescission of contract

You might also like