Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiffs,
v.
Defendant.
_________________________________/
Plaintiffs MDLV, LLC d/b/a One Sotheby’s International Realty (“MDLV”) and RESF
Reserved Realty, Inc., (“RESF,” and together, “Plaintiffs”), by and through the undersigned
counsel, file the following deposition transcripts for the court record:
1. January 13, 2021 deposition transcript of Adriana Fernandez in her personal capacity
as Exhibit A;
2. March 31, 2021 deposition transcript of Adriana Fernandez in her capacity as All In
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 14th day of April, 2023, I electronically filed this
document with the Clerk of Court using Florida Courts E-Filing Portal.
2
EXHIBIT A
Page 1
Page 3 Page 5
1 INDEX
1 THE COURT REPORTER: The attorneys
2
Witness 2 participating in this deposition acknowledge that I,
3 3 the court reporter, am not present with the witness
ADRIANA FERNANDEZ
4 4 and that I will be reporting the proceedings and
Direct Examination By Ms. Fishfeld 6 5 administering the oath remotely. This arrangement
5
6 6 is pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court
7 7 Administrative Order. The parties and their counsel
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBITS
8 8 consent to this arrangement and waive any objections
9 Number Description Page 9 to this manner of reporting. Please indicate your
10 Exhibit 1 text messages. Lago 21-22 66
11 Exhibit 2 email chain 11 through 18 93 10 agreement by stating your name and your agreement on
12 Exhibit 3 flyer 102 11 the record.
13 Exhibit 4 Letter of Intent to 129
Purchase 12 MS. FISHFELD: This is Jessica Fishfeld from
14 13 Greenburg Traurig, and I agree.
Exhibit 5 3-1-2018 letter. Bates 468 132
15 14 MS. DE ALEJO: This is Alexandra De Alejo with
Exhibit 6 email chain. Bates 005 139 15 Gray Robinson, counsel for the defendant, as well as
16 through 009
17 Exhibit 7 AIO19 THROUGH AIO24 146 16 counsel for Adriana Fernandez, and we agree as well.
18 Exhibit 8 AIO190 THROUGH AIO192 155 17 THE COURT REPORTER: Ma'am, would you raise
19 Exhibit 9 Purchase and Sale 161
Agreement. AIO49 through
18 your right hand, please.
20 AIO71 19 Thereupon --
21 Exhibit 10 Purchase and Sale Agreement 164
22 Exhibit 11 email chain AIO72 through 173
20 ADRIANA FERNANDEZ
AIO74 21 was called as a witness by the Plaintiff and, having
23
Exhibit 12 Lago28 through Lago31 188
22 been first duly sworn, and responding, "Yes, I do," was
24 23 examined and testified as follows:
Exhibit 13 AIO181 through AIO184 191
24
25
Exhibit 14 text messages 195 25
2 (Pages 2 - 5)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 6 Page 8
1 DIRECT EXAMINATION 1 A He did -- he did not introduce me to Alex
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 Alvarez. I know Alex Alvarez, as I went to school with
3 Q Great. Well, let's begin. 3 Alex Alvarez' son for all my elementary years from
4 Hi, Adriana. Am I pronouncing your name 4 kindergarten to eighth grade, so I do know who Alex
5 correctly? 5 Alvarez is.
6 A Adriana. 6 Q Did Manny tell you that Alex Alvarez was
7 Q And I see Eddy Fernandez is here as well. Good 7 interested in purchasing your property?
8 morning. I am here at Greenburg Traurig. Of course, I 8 A I do not recall if it was Manny Chamizo who told
9 am counsel for the plaintiff. And in the room with me 9 me that he's the one that was interested in the
10 is Mr. Manny Chamizo. 10 property.
11 Adriana, can you please state your complete name 11 Q You did sell the property to Alex Alvarez,
12 for the record? 12 right?
13 A My name is Adriana Rita Garcia -- Fernandez. 13 A Yes, I did.
14 Q So state the name -- 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Just to be clear, when you say
15 A Adriana Rita Fernandez. 15 "you," you're referring to Adriana in her personal
16 Q Okay. And what is your address? 16 sense or you as the defendant All In One Investment?
17 A My address is 9600 Southwest 100 Street, Miami, 17 MS. FISHFELD: I am referring to Adriana as the
18 Florida 33176. 18 managing member of All In One.
19 Q And your phone number, please? 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Okay, thank you.
20 A My cell phone number is (786) 261-1144. 20 BY MS. FISHFELD:
21 Q What is your date of birth? 21 Q And you sold the property to Alex Alvarez
22 A December 13th, 1980. 22 through an LLC he created called 3251 Property, LLC,
23 Q You're a managing member of an entity called All 23 right?
24 In One Investment Properties, LLC? 24 A I did not create an LLC called 3251.
25 A Yes, I am. 25 Q No. Alex Alvarez created that LLC in order to
Page 7 Page 9
1 Q And I will refer to that entity as All In one, 1 purchase the building, right?
2 unless I otherwise indicate. Is that fine? 2 A I believe so.
3 A Yes, it is. 3 Q Well, you sold the property to 3251 Property,
4 Q In June 2019, All In One sold a property at 3251 4 LLC, right?
5 Ponce de Leon, correct? 5 A Yes. I do not have the sales contract in front
6 A Yes. 6 of me or the settlement statement. If that's what
7 Q And do you have personal knowledge about that 7 you're saying we sold it to, then we did sell it to
8 sale? 8 3251.
9 A Yes, I do. 9 Q Okay. Before we get into the specifics of
10 Q What was your general role in that sale? 10 everything, I wanted to go over the timeline with you
11 A I am one of the managing members of All In One 11 so that we can try to get on the same page about what
12 Investment Properties. I own the building that was 12 generally happened when.
13 sold. 13 Is it right that you and -- by "you," unless I
14 Q Did you play an active role in the negotiations 14 otherwise indicate, I'm talking about All In One. Is
15 for the sale of that property? 15 it correct that you purchased the property in December
16 A Yes. 16 of 2016?
17 Q Why didn't All In One pay a real estate 17 A Yes.
18 commission to Manny Chamizo for the sale of that 18 Q And is it right that Vince Lago helped you
19 property? 19 purchase that property?
20 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 20 A Yes.
21 THE WITNESS: He was not our agent. 21 Q And he was your real estate agent in that
22 BY MS. FISHFELD: 22 transaction?
23 Q Was he ever your agent? 23 A Yes.
24 A No, he was not. 24 Q And then in around May 2017, you decided to sell
25 Q Did Mr. Chamizo introduce you to Alex Alvarez? 25 the property?
3 (Pages 6 - 9)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 10 Page 12
1 A No. 1 terms in June 2018 very intensely, right?
2 Q Around when did you decide to sell the property? 2 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
3 A We had -- from January to June of 2017, we had 3 THE WITNESS: Yes.
4 the property up for leases. We were doing renovations. 4 BY MS. FISHFELD:
5 We never listed the property to sell. We just -- my 5 Q Then still in June 2018, those negotiations
6 husband and I, if we knew that if someone would come in 6 broke down?
7 with an offer, and we would accept it because it's real 7 A They broke down in June of 2018. We never
8 estate, if the offer was good enough we would sell, but 8 signed a contract or went with the sale of the
9 not necessarily did we have it in the market as our 9 property.
10 intention was to move our businesses into that 10 Q Shortly after those negotiations broke down, did
11 building, which we did in December of 2017. 11 Manny send some angry or rude text messages to Eddy
12 Q So you said that you didn't necessarily decide 12 Fernandez?
13 to sell it, but you had in your mind that if you got an 13 A Yes, he definitely did. He sent group text
14 offer that was sufficient, you would consider that 14 messages, including Vince Lago, Roly Benitez, and
15 offer, right? 15 himself. The first one was received on Friday,
16 A Yeah. Everything I own, I would sell if I got 16 June 22nd, 2018, midafternoon. I clearly remember
17 an offer that is sufficient, except my house. 17 because I was getting to my beach condo and I remember
18 Q Did you reach out to Vince Lago to let him know 18 thinking how absurd it was.
19 that you would entertain offers to purchase the 19 Q And I will ask you more questions about that,
20 property? 20 but right now I'm just trying to get our bearings and
21 A No, I did not. 21 go over the timeline.
22 Q Did Eddy Fernandez? 22 A Okay.
23 A I could not speak on behalf of Eddy Fernandez. 23 Q So after those text messages that you just
24 Q Did AIO reach out to Vince Lago to let him know 24 referred to, Vince and Eddy Fernandez got together and
25 that AIO was interested in entertaining offers to 25 smoothed over their relationship?
Page 11 Page 13
1 purchase the property? 1 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
2 MS. DE ALEJO: And just so the record is clear, 2 THE WITNESS: Yes. They met for breakfast.
3 by AIO, you're referring to All In One? 3 BY MS. FISHFELD:
4 MS. FISHFELD: Yes. I'm sorry. All In One. 4 Q Then, is it right that in September 2018, All In
5 THE WITNESS: Yes. 5 One decided to list the property for sale?
6 BY MS. FISHFELD: 6 A In September 2018, Eddy Fernandez asked Vince
7 Q Who on behalf of All In One reached out to Vince 7 Lago if he wanted to list the property. Vince Lago
8 Lago? 8 never agreed to list the property, so as Eddy Fernandez
9 A Eddy Fernandez. 9 is a broker, he listed the property in late
10 Q Okay. Just a moment, please. 10 September -- end of September of 2018 for sale.
11 When did Eddy Fernandez on behalf of All In One 11 Q Then still in September 2018, Liz Diaz reached
12 reach out to Vince to let him know that All In One 12 out to Vince asking if she could contact Eddy directly,
13 would entertain offers to purchase the property? 13 right?
14 A I do not have an exact date. 14 A Yes.
15 Q What's your general recollection? 15 Q And Vince agreed that she could speak to Eddy
16 A I would say probably some time in mid-2017. 16 directly?
17 Q Did Vince Lago introduce you to Manny Chamizo? 17 A If my memory serves me right from the emails we
18 A Yes. 18 have read, yes.
19 Q And then Manny and Vince started showing the 19 Q And Vince also told Eddy that he could speak
20 property and presenting you potential buyers, right? 20 directly to Liz?
21 A Correct. 21 A Yes.
22 Q And then in May or June of 2018, Manny submitted 22 Q And then Eddy and Liz did, in fact, speak in
23 a contract offer from Alex Alvarez? 23 September 2018, right?
24 A Yes. 24 A I believe it was an email that she sent. I
25 Q And then the parties negotiated the contract 25 don't remember.
4 (Pages 10 - 13)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 14 Page 16
1 Q But they communicated about the sale of the 1 Q And for the record, when I refer to the
2 property at that time? 2 property, I am talking about 3251 Ponce de Leon.
3 A Yes. But the price wasn't right for the buyer. 3 A Understood.
4 Q Okay. Then a few months passed and in 4 Q Why did you and Eddy Fernandez create All In
5 March 2019, Eddy Fernandez reached back out to Liz 5 One?
6 Diaz, right? 6 A We created it by advice from our CPA when we
7 A No. 7 were purchasing our first commercial real estate
8 Q Okay. Did Eddy Fernandez ever reach back out to 8 property.
9 Liz Diaz? 9 Q What was the first commercial real estate
10 A Not that I am aware of. 10 property that you purchased?
11 Q Okay. Did Eddy and Liz Diaz ever restart 11 A 3251 Ponce de Leon.
12 negotiations regarding the sale of the property? 12 Q So I understand you're the managing member of
13 A Yes. 13 All In One Investment.
14 Q Okay. When was that? 14 Can you generally describe your responsibilities
15 A March of 2019. 15 in that role?
16 Q And then in June 2019, All In One sold the 16 A We currently own a shopping center, so I deal
17 property to Alex Alvarez' entity that he created? 17 with the property manager that we have. It is not a
18 A Yes. 18 day-to-day job. It's more on a weekly basis we speak
19 Q Okay. Adriana, are you on any medications today 19 to her to see exactly how it's going. And the building
20 that would inhibit your ability to testify truthfully? 20 that we own in Miami, just make sure that rent is
21 A No, I am not. 21 collected. That's it.
22 Q What is All In One? 22 Q Who else is involved with All In One?
23 A What is All In One Investment Properties, is 23 A At this moment, just myself.
24 that your question? 24 Q Was Eddy Fernandez ever involved with All In
25 Q Yes. 25 One?
Page 15 Page 17
1 A It's a business that owns two real estate -- two 1 A Yes, he was.
2 commercial properties at this moment. 2 Q What was his role?
3 Q Is the sole purpose of that entity to purchase, 3 A He also would speak to the management company in
4 own and sell real estate? 4 regards to questions or things he needed to fix in the
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 shopping center or the commercial building.
6 THE WITNESS: It does not sell real estate. It 6 Q Was he a managing member of All In One?
7 owns the buildings, the commercial buildings. It 7 A We're both managing members of All In One.
8 does not sell. 8 Q You both were?
9 BY MS. FISHFELD: 9 A We both are.
10 Q Okay. So the sole purpose of All In One is to 10 Q Oh, you both are?
11 own commercial real estate? 11 A Yes.
12 A Yes. 12 Q Okay. I thought you said only you are involved
13 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 13 with All In One.
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 A Yes, I am only involved because my husband has
15 Q Does it do anything else? 15 cancer, so he's not working since July of 2019 -- 2020.
16 A No. 16 Q I understand. So Eddy Fernandez is still a
17 Q When was that entity formed? 17 managing member of All In One, but he is not actively
18 A I do not know the date. 18 playing a role in the duties that come with that?
19 Q Was it in the last five years? 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
20 A Yes, because we purchased the building in 2016, 20 THE WITNESS: He does. He does respond back to
21 so most likely yes, it would be within the last five 21 some emails. I do live with my husband, so we do
22 years. 22 discuss questions that might arise from our property
23 Q And is it your recollection that that entity was 23 manager or our tenants. But he is not involved in a
24 created shortly before you purchased the property? 24 day-to-day always as he's a cancer patient and he's
25 A Yes. 25 in rehab right now due to his conditions.
5 (Pages 14 - 17)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 18 Page 20
1 Is that clear? 1 those entities?
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 A Yes, I am.
3 Q Yes. I'm sorry to hear about your husband's 3 Q Is Eddy Fernandez a managing member of all of
4 illness and I'm sorry to you, Mr. Fernandez. 4 those three entities?
5 A Thank you. 5 A Yes.
6 Q So you, I understand, have graciously picked up 6 Q How many properties has All In One owned?
7 managing the affairs of All In One during your 7 A Three.
8 husband's illness; is that right? 8 Q What are they?
9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 9 A 3251 Ponce de Leon, 6780 Southwest 80th Street,
10 THE WITNESS: Yes. 10 4270 in Melbourne, Florida. I don't know the exact
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 address. I believe it's 4270 Minton Road.
12 Q So would it be fair to characterize your role as 12 Q Which of those three properties does All In One
13 a very involved role in the affairs of All In One? 13 still currently own?
14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 14 A 6780 and 4270 Minton Road.
15 THE WITNESS: Yes. 15 Q When did All In One purchase 6780?
16 BY MS. FISHFELD: 16 A Either June or July of 2019.
17 Q And was that true before July 2009? 17 Q Did you use a real estate agent for that
18 A Before July 2009, the company did not exist. 18 purchase?
19 You said July 2009. That was 11 years ago. 19 A Yes, we did.
20 Q I meant July 2019. 20 Q Who was the real estate agent?
21 A Oh, before July 2019, yes. We're both involved 21 A Eddy Fernandez.
22 in the role of All In One Investment Properties and all 22 Q Did Eddy Fernandez earn a commission?
23 businesses that we have. 23 A Yes.
24 Q So even before July 2019, you and your husband 24 Q How much was the commission?
25 would regularly discuss decisions to be made with 25 A I do not know.
Page 19 Page 21
1 respect to the business? 1 Q Is there a document that you could refer to that
2 A Yes. 2 would refresh your recollection?
3 Q When decisions are made, they're made by both of 3 A Yes, I am sure I could get the sales contract,
4 you? 4 but I do not have that in front of me.
5 A Yes. 5 Q So if you saw the sales contract, then you would
6 Q So you work as a team? 6 know what commission Eddy Fernandez earned on the
7 A We are a team. 7 purchase of 6780?
8 MS. DE ALEJO: Just to be clear, are you 8 A Correct. The sales contract or the settlement
9 referring to decisions made on behalf of the 9 statement would have it.
10 defendant All In One? 10 Q What type of property is 6780?
11 MS. FISHFELD: Yes. 11 A It's a standalone building in South Miami.
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Okay. 12 Q Is it an office building?
13 BY MS. FISHFELD: 13 A Yes, it's an office building.
14 Q So when All In One was entertaining offers to 14 Q When did you purchase 4270?
15 purchase the property, you were personally involved in 15 A December 2019.
16 those decisions, right? 16 Q Did you use a broker to purchase that building?
17 A Yes. 17 A Yes.
18 Q What other businesses or entities do you own? 18 Q Who was it?
19 A I own All In One Mortgage Investments. One 19 A Eddy Fernandez.
20 Realty, LLC. 20 Q Did he earn a commission?
21 Q So in total you own All In One Investment 21 A Yes.
22 Properties, LLC, All In One Mortgage Investments, LLC 22 Q How much was it?
23 and One Realty, LLC? 23 A I do not have it in front of me.
24 A Yes. 24 Q You would want to look at the sales contract to
25 Q Are you the managing member of all three of 25 know?
6 (Pages 18 - 21)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 22 Page 24
1 A Or the settlement statement, to be able to give 1 A I am a branch manager of a mortgage lending.
2 you the exact amount. 2 Q And the mortgage lending company you refer to,
3 Q Okay. What sort of building is 4270? 3 is that All In One Mortgage Investments, LLC?
4 A It's a shopping center. 4 A No. It is Geneva Financial d/b/a All In One
5 Q Like a -- 5 Mortgage Lenders. I do not own that company.
6 A Like a strip mall. Like a strip mall, exactly. 6 Q How long have you -- I'm sorry. Go ahead.
7 Q What sort of tenants are in the strip mall? 7 A No. I was just going to say that I am an
8 A Restaurants, barber shops, nail salon, physical 8 employee.
9 therapist, supermarket, Subway. 9 Q And your title is branch manager?
10 Q So am I correct that All In One is still an 10 A Correct.
11 ongoing business? 11 Q How long have you been employed by the Geneva
12 A Yes. As I mentioned, we own two properties that 12 employer that you referenced?
13 they are both under All In One Investment Properties, 13 A January 2018.
14 so yes, it is an ongoing business. 14 Q Were you always branch manager?
15 Q Do you have any plans to close the business? 15 A No.
16 A At this moment, no. 16 Q I'm sorry?
17 Q Are you planning on purchasing any more 17 A Could you please rephrase your questions in
18 properties? 18 exactly what time frame you're asking what my
19 A No, not at this moment. 19 profession was?
20 Q Are you planning to sell either of the two 20 Q So I understand that you're currently employed
21 properties All In One currently owns? 21 by a mortgage lending entity with the name of Geneva.
22 A Not at this moment. 22 And you were first employed by that entity in
23 Q Where does All In One currently own bank 23 January 2018?
24 accounts? 24 A Yes.
25 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 25 Q What was your title when you were first hired in
Page 23 Page 25
1 Before we get into this, we don't have a judgment 1 January 2018?
2 entered. I don't know how this is relevant, how the 2 A Same title. Branch manager.
3 financial information of the company is relevant at 3 Q Oh, okay. So you haven't held any other roles
4 this time. I am going to instruct the witness not 4 with that employer?
5 to respond. 5 A No.
6 If you have a judgment, then you can go for 6 Q What was your employment before January 2018?
7 post-judgment discovery, but where they have bank 7 A How far back would you like me to go?
8 accounts and any information regarding that is not 8 Q Let's go immediately before your current role as
9 relevant and not proper at this time. 9 branch manager at Geneva.
10 MS. FISHFELD: So for the record, you're 10 A I was a managing member of All In One Mortgage
11 instructing the witness not to answer? 11 Lenders, COO from August 2006 to January 2018.
12 MS. DE ALEJO: You can tell her the bank you 12 Q Okay. Did you hold any other roles other than
13 have it at, but other than that, no other 13 that during that time period?
14 information you can provide. If you want to tell 14 A No. I did own All In One Mortgage Investments
15 her where you have a bank account, fine, but no 15 during that time period as well.
16 other explanation. 16 Q And what are your responsibilities with All In
17 THE WITNESS: First Bank. 17 One Mortgage Investments, LLC?
18 BY MS. FISHFELD: 18 A Just a managing member.
19 Q Well, that was the question. So thank you. 19 Q And can you describe the responsibilities that
20 Is that in Miami? 20 come with that role?
21 A Yes. 21 A I deal with my accountant because we collect
22 Q Are there any other banks that All In One has 22 private money, lend private money, so I deal with my
23 accounts with? 23 accountant making sure that I get payments on a monthly
24 A No. 24 basis of the interest that's due for the mortgages, for
25 Q Adriana, what is your profession? 25 the notes that I have out. That's it. Doesn't take
7 (Pages 22 - 25)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 26 Page 28
1 much time. 1 education?
2 Q Are you a real estate agent? 2 A Yes. I worked in education, I did.
3 A I am not. 3 Q What did you do?
4 Q Are you familiar with the Realtor Code of 4 A A teacher for special education children.
5 Ethics? 5 Q Wonderful. What grades?
6 A I am not. 6 A Six, seventh and eighth grade; students with
7 Q Do you have any other licenses, professional 7 severe autism.
8 licenses? 8 Q Which school?
9 A Do you mean licenses or do you mean, like, 9 A Paul Bell Middle School in Miami, Florida.
10 college degrees? 10 Q Where did you go to college?
11 Q Well, I'd like to hear about your college 11 A For my undergrad, I went to FIU. For my
12 degrees, but first my question is whether you have any 12 master's I went to FIU, and for my specialist I went to
13 professional licenses? 13 Nova.
14 A Licenses? I am a mortgage loan originator. I 14 Q When did you graduate from undergrad?
15 am licensed. 15 A I graduated from undergrad in 2003. My master's
16 Q When did you get your mortgage loan originator 16 in 2005, and my specialist in 2006. You can correct
17 license? 17 that. I had said before 2005. I graduated in 2006
18 A I'm not sure on the exact date, but I would like 18 from my specialist.
19 to guesstimate around 2011. 19 Q What was your major in college?
20 MS. DE ALEJO: I'm going to put on the record, 20 A My major was emotionally handicapped children.
21 Adriana has not had her deposition taken before. 21 My master's was for special education and my specialist
22 You did not go over the rules. Just let her know 22 degree was for higher education administration.
23 that we're not going to guess, we're not going to 23 Q Were you born and raised in Miami?
24 estimate. That is one of the rules for the 24 A Yes, I was.
25 deposition. Since she's never had her depo taken, I 25 Q So we talked a little bit before about how you
Page 27 Page 29
1 just want to put that on there. 1 play an active role in the real estate transactions of
2 THE WITNESS: So I do not know the date of my 2 All In One, right?
3 license. We could look it up in the MLS, if 3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
4 necessary. 4 THE WITNESS: Yes.
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 BY MS. FISHFELD:
6 Q Is there an entity with which you hang your 6 Q Would you characterize yourself as a savvy real
7 license for mortgage loan originator? 7 estate person?
8 A Yes. The company that I mentioned that I work 8 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
9 for as a branch manager, Geneva Financial d/b/a All In 9 THE WITNESS: I'm sorry, could you please
10 One Mortgage Lenders. 10 repeat the question?
11 Q What is your highest level of education? 11 BY MS. FISHFELD:
12 A I have a specialist degree. 12 Q Would you characterize yourself as a
13 Q What's that? 13 sophisticated real estate person?
14 A What is a specialist degree? 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
15 Q Yes. 15 THE WITNESS: No.
16 A It's a degree after you have a bachelor's, then 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 you get a master's and then you can get either a 17 Q Why not?
18 doctorate or a specialist degree, and I have a 18 A Because I do not hold a real estate license.
19 specialist degree in education. My goal was to become 19 Q Okay. Do you understand how real estate
20 a principal one day. 20 transactions happen generally?
21 Q When did you receive your specialist degree? 21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
22 A 2005. 22 THE WITNESS: Yes, I do have general knowledge.
23 Q Did you work in education after that? 23 BY MS. FISHFELD:
24 A Before that, yes, I was a teacher. 24 Q Do you often use a broker when you buy or sell
25 Q Sorry. Okay. After 2005, did you work in 25 properties?
8 (Pages 26 - 29)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 30 Page 32
1 A I have only purchased two commercial properties 1 Realtor that was listing -- that listed the property
2 and a beach condo and my husband has been the Realtor. 2 for about six months, beginning of 2017, but once we
3 Q And for each of those, did your husband earn a 3 moved in, we did not.
4 commission? 4 Q So who listed the property or the bottom floor
5 A No. 5 for rent in 2017?
6 Q For none of them? 6 A Her name is Thomas Smith.
7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 7 Q Could you repeat that?
8 THE WITNESS: No. That's not what I said. You 8 A Thomas Smith.
9 asked me for each of those and I said not for each 9 Q Her name is Thomas?
10 of those. 10 A His name is Thomas. Thomas Smith.
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 Q When did you take the first floor off the market
12 Q So for which ones did your husband earn a real 12 for rent?
13 estate commission? 13 A June. I believe it was June 2017.
14 A For the purchasing of 6780 and the purchasing of 14 Q So you first purchased the property in
15 4270. 15 December 2018, right?
16 Q So as you know, we're here today about 3251 16 A No. We purchased the property in December 2016.
17 Ponce de Leon, the property. 17 Q 20 --
18 Can you generally describe that property? 18 A 2016.
19 A It is a standalone office building in Coral 19 Q That's the number I said in my head. I think
20 Gables in a corner. It has about 10,000 square feet, 20 another number came out.
21 three floors, parking garage of about 17 spaces. 21 A Okay.
22 Including parking garage, you'd probably say it had 22 Q Why did you decide to purchase the property?
23 13,000 square feet. It was renovated by us throughout 23 A My husband and I had -- financially had decided
24 the year of 2017. I don't know what else you would 24 it was a good step to do so. We didn't want to
25 like to know about the property. 25 continue leasing. We had the means to do so. So we
Page 31 Page 33
1 Q Does it have individual suites? 1 started looking for a property. Instead of leasing we
2 A We divided the property into four suites. 2 thought it would be a good investment to invest our
3 Q Why did you do that? 3 money in a commercial property.
4 A Because it's the layout of the building. It's 4 Q Approximately, how long were the negotiations to
5 how the building was laid out. It had two suites at 5 purchase the property?
6 the bottom and on the top it was two suites. We just 6 A I was not involved in those negotiations.
7 divided it how the building was when we renovated it. 7 Q Oh, okay. Who on behalf of All In One was
8 Q And so did you then rent out the suites 8 involved in those negotiations?
9 individually to tenants? 9 A Eddy Fernandez.
10 A We were our own tenant. We did not have -- we 10 Q Why weren't you at that time?
11 never had anybody else in the building as a tenant. 11 A Because we owned a mortgage lender, a full-size
12 Q And when you say "we were our own tenant, which 12 mortgage lender and I was involved in all of the
13 entity was a tenant in the property? 13 day-to-day operations when it came to that. So I did
14 A The first floor was vacant. The second floor on 14 not have the time to be involved in the negotiations.
15 one side had One Realty. And the other side had All In 15 I did go see the property. We spoke about it,
16 One Mortgage Lenders. 16 liked it, got with general contractors to see how much
17 Q Why was the first floor vacant? 17 it would cost to do the renovations of the property.
18 A Personal choice of us that we were there and we 18 But when you say "negotiations" with a Realtor, or with
19 did not want to have tenants on the bottom. We didn't 19 commissions, I was not involved with that.
20 want to be the landlord and have tenants on the bottom. 20 Q Okay. For how much did you purchase the
21 We didn't see a need to have to. We didn't have a need 21 property?
22 to rent it out. 22 A 3.8 million.
23 Q So you weren't trying to rent it out? 23 Q Was that a good price?
24 A We did initially before we moved in, but after 24 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
25 we moved in, we did not. We had -- we were with a 25 THE WITNESS: At that time, in that market,
9 (Pages 30 - 33)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 34 Page 36
1 yes, it was a good price. 1 helped you resolve a permitting issue with the parking?
2 MS. FISHFELD: I'm hearing some echo on your 2 A Yes. But it had nothing to do with the parking
3 end. Are you hearing that? 3 garage. Vince Lago helped us with Kevin Kenney, who is
4 MS. DE ALEJO: I'm hearing it, too. 4 from the City of Coral Gables, get a handicap spot in
5 THE WITNESS: We're hearing it, too. I think 5 the front of our office, but it had nothing to do with
6 it's coming from you. 6 an issue of inside the parking. They did get -- he did
7 Mr. Chamizo needs to be silenced. 7 -- Vince Lago did assist us, handheld us pretty much,
8 BY MS. FISHFELD: 8 to be able to get the city to put a handicap parking
9 Q After you purchased the property in 9 for us in the front of the building on Ponce de Leon,
10 December 2016, did you do some remodeling or 10 which I am sure it's still there if you drive by it.
11 construction work to the property? 11 Q Understood. So I think you kind of already
12 A I wouldn't say some. I would say a lot. 12 covered it, but is there anything else that you can add
13 Q Okay. So describe that for me. 13 to describe how exactly Vince Lago helped you obtain
14 A We renovated about 50 percent of the building. 14 the handicap spot in the front of the building?
15 Q Approximately, how much did that cost? 15 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
16 A 1.1 million. 16 THE WITNESS: Yes. There's emails that were
17 Q Why did you decide to undertake that 17 provided by us and by Vince where you will see that
18 construction work? 18 he advises the city commissioner's office assistant
19 A Because the building was a 1960s time warp. It 19 to help with Kevin Kenney to help us to get a
20 had rugs. Anybody that would walk in there if you had 20 parking lot -- a parking spot there for a handicap
21 means to do it, I think anybody would have gone in and 21 spot. That's it.
22 rehabbed the building if they were going to be putting 22 BY MS. FISHFELD:
23 in their companies in there, where their employees were 23 Q Okay. There came a time when you decided to
24 going to be working on a daily basis and were used to 24 sell the property, right?
25 having a nice comfortable office. I would not move 25 A As I mentioned earlier, there never came a time
Page 35 Page 37
1 them into an office that was not up to par to what they 1 that we decided to sell the property. If we had offers
2 were used to and accustomed to and would be nice for my 2 that were brought to us that we were okay with, we
3 employees. 3 would consider them. Because if we own something and
4 Q You mentioned there was a parking garage. 4 right now, if they would bring me a contract for 6780
5 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry? 5 and it would make sense and I would punch my numbers
6 BY MS. FISHFELD: 6 and speak to my attorney and speak to my CPA and it
7 Q I said that she mentioned that there was a 7 would make sense, I would be willing to sell even
8 parking garage and I wanted to ask some questions about 8 though it might not be listed. So I wouldn't
9 the parking garage. 9 necessarily say that there came a time, it was just if
10 Did there come a time that there was some 10 an offer was there and if the market was there for us
11 problem with the parking situation? 11 to be able to sell a property, we would, except my
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 12 home.
13 THE WITNESS: Could you -- I am not sure 13 Q Okay. So you never made a concrete decision
14 exactly what you're trying to ask in regards to the 14 that you wanted to sell the property?
15 parking. There was nothing wrong with the parking 15 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
16 itself, with the parking garage. 16 THE WITNESS: No.
17 You mean like, the indoor parking, if there was 17 BY MS. FISHFELD:
18 something wrong with the indoor parking? 18 Q But if you received an offer that had favorable
19 BY MS. FISHFELD: 19 terms, then you would consider that offer and
20 Q My question was vague because I don't really 20 potentially sell it?
21 know what I am asking either. 21 A Yes. But we never received an offer with
22 I understand there may have been some issue with 22 favorable terms that we agreed with.
23 the permitting for the parking; is that right? 23 Q Well, you did sell the property, right?
24 A No. 24 A Yes, I did.
25 Q Okay. Do you recall a time when Vince Lago 25 Q So were those terms favorable?
10 (Pages 34 - 37)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 38 Page 40
1 A Those terms were favorable, yes. And it was a 1 Q Do you think Vince is a kind person?
2 good time as well and there were properties in the 2 A I don't know him in that manner.
3 market for us to be able to move our companies to. 3 Q Do you think Vince is a professional person?
4 Q Okay. Well, we've been talking about Vince 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
5 Lago, so I'll phrase it like this. You know Vince 5 THE WITNESS: Yes.
6 Lago, right? 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 A Yes. I met Vince Lago once we purchased 3251. 7 Q Do you think Vince is an honest person?
8 Q Did you meet him after you purchased the 8 A I do not know him well enough to answer that
9 property? 9 question.
10 A He came to my office and I went to the City of 10 Q What was the nature of Eddy Fernandez's
11 Coral Gables, his commissioner's office a couple of 11 relationship with Vince Lago?
12 times, for him to assist us with the rehab that we were 12 A Amicable.
13 doing in the building. 13 Q And it was a business relationship?
14 Q Okay. So you didn't know Vince before you 14 A Yes.
15 purchased the property? 15 Q Would you say they were also friends?
16 A No, I did not. 16 A No.
17 Q So was it shortly after you purchased the 17 Q Why did All In One decide to use Vince Lago to
18 property that you met him? 18 help purchase the property as the agent?
19 A No. I met him when we purchased the property, 19 A Because it was -- he's the one that found us the
20 not shortly after. I met him when we purchased the 20 property. He had the property and he said, "I know
21 property. He was the Realtor on the transaction when 21 this property, let's have lunch." Told my husband
22 we purchased the property. 22 "let's go to lunch and let me show you the property."
23 Q So while you were purchasing the property, 23 Q After he helped you purchase the property and
24 that's how you met him? 24 you purchased it, what was your relationship like with
25 A Correct. I did not know him before. We were 25 Vince going forward?
Page 39 Page 41
1 introduced to him when we purchased 3251. 1 A He introduced us to the architect to use. The
2 Q Do you know how Eddy Fernandez knows Vince Lago? 2 City of Coral Gables, he mentioned how the architect
3 A Same exact way I do. We were introduced to him 3 was liked by everybody in permitting there, so he would
4 by Manny Garcia. 4 be a good choice to use. His name is Marshal Bellin.
5 Q Why did Manny Garcia introduce you and Eddy to 5 He brought us to the City of Coral Gables court, and he
6 Vince Lago? 6 introduced us to the individuals there, everybody in
7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 7 the permitting department and architectural department.
8 THE WITNESS: We were introduced to him because 8 He introduced us to all the commissioners there that we
9 we mentioned to Manny that we were looking for a 9 had just purchased the property on there on Ponce. He
10 property to purchase and we had been searching, 10 walked us over to the fire station to ask if we had any
11 looking for properties, going to visit properties 11 questions. That's the relationship we had with him.
12 and seeing exactly just -- that we needed -- we 12 Q So Vince continued to have a hands-on role with
13 wanted to find a property to purchase, a commercial 13 helping you with respect to the property?
14 property to purchase. And he said, well, I know 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
15 this guy, he's a commissioner of City of Coral 15 THE WITNESS: Yes. When it was questions in
16 Gables, he's into real estate, maybe he can help. 16 regards to the rehab, he assisted when need be,
17 Let me introduce you. And that's how it went. 17 which was one of the conversations he had with my
18 BY MS. FISHFELD: 18 husband, that he would assist and make it a smooth
19 Q What was the nature of your relationship with 19 transaction for us.
20 Vince when you first met him? 20 BY MS. FISHFELD:
21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 21 Q Did there come a time when All In One told Vince
22 THE WITNESS: The only nature we've always had, 22 Lago that you would be open to receiving offers for you
23 business relationship. 23 to sell the property?
24 24 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 Asked and answered.
11 (Pages 38 - 41)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 42 Page 44
1 THE WITNESS: Yes. There was a time. 1 going to eventually look.
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 So it wasn't just Vince who was interested in
3 Q Who told Vince that All In One would be 3 sending -- you know, showing us buyers. It was other
4 interested in receiving offers to sell the property? 4 individuals as well, other Realtors did as well.
5 A That would be Eddy Fernandez. 5 Q Who were those other Realtors that you're
6 Q And when did Eddy communicate that to Vince? 6 referring to?
7 A Sometime in mid to late 2017. 7 A I do not have their exact names.
8 Q Were you involved in that communication? 8 Q How many were there?
9 A Directly with Vince Lago, no. 9 A I do not have an account of how many there were.
10 Q Do you have knowledge about what was said to 10 Q Was it more than five?
11 Vince at that time? 11 A Yes.
12 A My husband and I would speak in regards to what 12 Q Wow. More than ten?
13 numbers we would want, but I never spoke directly to 13 A In what time frame?
14 Vince in regards to any negotiations. 14 Q I mean, I don't know. From the time that you
15 Q So do you know what Eddy communicated to Vince 15 purchased the property to June 2018, how many Realtors
16 with respect to All In One's interest in potentially 16 were trying to help you sell the property?
17 selling the property? 17 A I do not have the exact number.
18 A Yes. That if they had any buyers, and the offer 18 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
19 was good, that we would be willing to sell. 19 BY MS. FISHFELD:
20 Q Do you know how that communication was made? 20 Q I'm sorry. What was your answer?
21 A No. 21 A I said I do not have an exact number.
22 Q You don't know if it was by phone or by text or 22 Q Okay. Was it more than ten?
23 by email? 23 A I do not know.
24 A No, I do not know the exact form of 24 Q Okay. But definitely, you think more than five?
25 communication how that was made. 25 A Yes.
Page 43 Page 45
1 Q How did Vince respond to Eddy's communication 1 Q Did any of those Realtors present to you
2 that All In One would be interested in receiving offers 2 proposed contracts from potential buyers?
3 to purchase the property? 3 A Yes.
4 A He said, yeah, sure, I'll see what's out there. 4 Q How many contracts were presented to you by real
5 He kept it in mind. 5 estate agents, other than Vince Lago?
6 Q Did either you or Eddy contact any other real 6 A I do not know.
7 estate agents? 7 Q Was it more than five?
8 A Yes. We had several real estate agents really 8 A No, I do not think so.
9 contact us. During that time, it was -- I'm not sure 9 MS. DE ALEJO: I'm just putting it out there,
10 right now how it is for the Coral Gables market, but 10 whenever you get a breaking point, if I can take a
11 during that time, there wasn't too many standalone 11 quick bathroom break. I'd like to do that.
12 buildings with the amount of square feet that that 12 MS. FISHFELD: Perfect. I probably have like a
13 building had and the potential that the building had. 13 couple more questions, then it'll be a good time.
14 So we did have quite a few Realtors reach out to us and 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Okay.
15 go and visit the property. Interested in the property, 15 BY MS. FISHFELD:
16 definitely. 16 Q So the Realtors who presented you proposed
17 Q Were those Realtors representing buyers? 17 contracts, did some of them represent buyers?
18 A Both. They didn't really -- they weren't really 18 A I do not remember.
19 specific. Most of them would say we might have a buyer 19 Q Did some of them represent you?
20 for you, could we go see the property, we want to go 20 A I do not remember.
21 see the property to see how it is. We were in the 21 Q If you accepted one of those proposed contracts
22 middle of a rehab during that time, so it was like bare 22 that were presented to you, did you understand that you
23 concrete walls, nothing, you know. It looked like a 23 would pay a commission?
24 disaster zone, but people wanted to go see. We had the 24 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
25 plans, the architectural plans how the building was 25 THE WITNESS: I did not accept any contracts on
12 (Pages 42 - 45)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 46 Page 48
1 that building until 2019. Any contracts or any 1 MS. FISHFELD: Okay, this is a good breaking
2 terms that were presented to me by any parties. 2 point. We can take a short break.
3 BY MS. FISHFELD: 3 You want to take what, five minutes?
4 Q Was it your understanding that if you had 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Five works perfect.
5 accepted those contract terms, you would pay a real 5 MS. FISHFELD: Okay.
6 estate commission? 6 (A break was taken from 11:08 a.m. to
7 A No, it was not. 7 11:19 a.m.)
8 Q So it was your understanding that if you 8 BY MS. FISHFELD:
9 accepted a contract from a real estate agent, you would 9 Q Let's go back on the record.
10 not pay that real estate agent a commission? 10 Adriana, what was your agreement with Vince Lago
11 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 11 with respect to All In One's sale of the property?
12 THE WITNESS: No. Our understanding is it was 12 A I did not have an agreement with Vince Lago.
13 always on top of whatever our net price was, the 13 Q Okay. You told him that you were interested in
14 buyer would pay. 14 receiving offers to purchase the property, right?
15 BY MS. FISHFELD: 15 A I did not tell him.
16 Q Okay. So for every single offer you received to 16 Q Okay. Did Eddy Fernandez tell him that?
17 purchase the property through a real estate agent, the 17 A Yes.
18 buyer would pay the commission? 18 Q What was All In One's agreement with Vince with
19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 19 respect to All In One's sale of the property?
20 THE WITNESS: Yes. 20 A We did not have an agreement in any terms.
21 MS. FISHFELD: What is your objection to form? 21 Q So you didn't want him to find a purchaser for
22 Because you're objecting to every question and 22 your property?
23 I don't know what the issue is. 23 A We asked him if he had a buyer that he would be
24 MS. DE ALEJO: I am not objecting to every 24 able to find for the property, but we never discussed
25 question. But when you ask a question that's not 25 with him any exact terms or had any agreements with
Page 47 Page 49
1 specific, I am allowed to object to the form. 1 him.
2 MS. FISHFELD: Of course you're allowed. I am 2 Q Did All In One tell him that he would earn a
3 asking what your grounds are. 3 commission if he successfully procured a buyer?
4 MS. DE ALEJO: Vague and overbroad. That's 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
5 why. That's my objection. 5 THE WITNESS: No, I do not remember.
6 MS. FISHFELD: Okay. 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 BY MS. FISHFELD: 7 Q So it's your testimony that you think Vince Lago
8 Q Is it your understanding that if you accept a 8 would find a purchaser for your property and not expect
9 proposed contract through a real estate agent, that the 9 a commission?
10 buyer will always pay any real estate commissions? 10 A That is not what I said. I said I did not have
11 A It depends on the negotiation of the contract 11 any exact terms with Vince Lago.
12 that is being presented, what terms the contract has of 12 Q Right. I understand that.
13 what you would accept. 13 I am asking: Did you have any expectation
14 As I said earlier, I never accepted or agreed or 14 whether you would pay a commission to Vince Lago if he
15 signed any contract or letter of intent until 2019. 15 brought you a buyer?
16 Q Thank you. 16 A We always had a net price and commissions were
17 A All negotiations are negotiations. Terms can 17 on top of that at buyer's expense.
18 always be changed. Doesn't necessarily -- there's 18 Q What do you mean by commissions were on top?
19 nothing written in stone on how terms for any real 19 A Well, we had a net price. Eddy and I sat down,
20 estate transaction need to be. 20 we did all the numbers, we spoke to our accountant. We
21 Q So the terms of any payment of a real estate 21 figured out what would be the cost if -- how we had
22 commission depend on the specific terms of each 22 just recently sold the property, what would be the cost
23 potential transaction, right? 23 that it cost us to resell the property so soon. And
24 A Correct. Yes. 24 the provisions of getting a 1031 exchange and we set a
25 Q Thank you. 25 number. We said, okay, if we're able to sell it for
13 (Pages 46 - 49)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 50 Page 52
1 this amount, this is what we would sell it for. And we 1 Q How much?
2 would always say -- and you have quite a few documents 2 A One hundred fifteen thousand.
3 that have been provided to you that we would say: This 3 Q Who paid that?
4 is the net price and commissions on top of that. 4 A The seller did.
5 Q And did you ever say that only the buyer would 5 Q How did you meet Manny Chamizo?
6 pay commissions? 6 A I met Manny Chamizo in my office.
7 A Yes, we did. And there's documents that you 7 Q Did Vince introduce you to Manny?
8 have and text messages and documents that say buyers 8 A It was either Vince or Eddy. I did not know of
9 will pay. 9 Manny Chamizo before a day that he came into my office
10 Q I haven't seen those documents. 10 or of him.
11 A Yes. If you look at some text messages from 11 Q Did Eddy meet Manny through Vince Lago?
12 Vince Lago and if you look at letters of intent, you 12 A No. Eddy has known Manny Chamizo for many
13 will also see it as well. They were provided to you. 13 years.
14 Q I have looked at all those documents very 14 Q How did Eddy know Manny?
15 carefully and I don't see that. 15 A From, I believe, it was a mutual friend that
16 Go ahead. 16 they had in common and being in the business so long,
17 (Simultaneous crosstalk.) 17 he knew -- he knew him.
18 A No. No, it's okay. 18 Q Why was Manny looped into the discussions about
19 Q Your husband earned a commission when you 19 selling the property?
20 purchased 6780 and 5270. Who paid that commission? 20 A That's probably a great question to ask Vince
21 A The seller did. 21 Lago. He's the one that looped him in. So maybe you
22 Q Thank you. Did you know that Vince's real 22 want to refer back to Vince and ask him that question.
23 estate experience was typically in commercial real 23 I am not a hundred percent sure why he was.
24 estate? 24 Q Do you have any understanding of why he was?
25 A Yes, that is what he told us when he was 25 A He is a real estate agent.
Page 51 Page 53
1 introduced to us. 1 Q So it's your testimony that Manny was looped
2 Q So what experience did you think that Vince Lago 2 into the negotiations about the sale of the property
3 had with real estate? 3 because he's a real estate agent?
4 A We were advised that he was a real estate agent, 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
5 that he was a commissioner of the City of Coral Gables, 5 THE WITNESS: Yes, he is a real estate agent.
6 and that he would be a good person. So that's how the 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 introduction came about. And once we were introduced 7 Q And that's why he was looped into negotiations
8 to him, better said, my husband Eddy Fernandez, was 8 about the sale of the property?
9 introduced to him, he said, I do have this property 9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
10 that's listed, seems like it might suit your needs. 10 THE WITNESS: Yes.
11 Let's meet up for lunch, I believe it was, and let me 11 BY MS. FISHFELD:
12 show you the property. 12 Q Did you tell Manny that you would be open to
13 Q I actually misspoke before. Did you know that 13 entertaining offers to purchase the property?
14 Vince's real estate experience was typically in 14 A I did not personally speak to Manny in regards
15 residential real estate? 15 to any negotiations.
16 A No. I did not know him before the transaction, 16 Q Did Eddy tell Manny that he was looking to
17 so I did not know anything of him. I just knew of him 17 entertain offers to purchase the property?
18 when they introduced me to him and he said he had this 18 A Yes, he did.
19 potential property. I did not do any sort of research 19 Q Did Manny agree to bring him some potential
20 on who Vince Lago was, on how much properties he had 20 buyers for the property?
21 sold or -- he just had a property that we were 21 A Yes, he did.
22 interested in. 22 Q Did you and Eddy understand that Manny had a lot
23 Q Did Vince Lago earn a commission when you 23 of experience selling commercial real estate in Miami?
24 purchased the property? 24 A Yes. He was a real estate agent.
25 A Yes, he did. 25 Q And did you and Eddy understand that Manny knew
14 (Pages 50 - 53)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 54 Page 56
1 a lot of people involved in the real estate market in 1 Manny Chamizo or Vince Lago.
2 Miami? 2 Q You testified that Eddy knew Manny before he
3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 3 spoke with Manny about finding a buyer for this
4 THE WITNESS: Yes. That is what Vince said. 4 property. Have you or Eddy ever done business with
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 Manny before?
6 Q So is that why Vince looped Manny into the 6 A I have never done business with Manny before. I
7 efforts to procure a buyer for the property? 7 could not speak on behalf of my husband as I do not
8 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 8 recall hearing of the name of Manny Chamizo before this
9 THE WITNESS: Yes. He is a real estate agent. 9 all started. I did not know of him, hear of him or
10 BY MS. FISHFELD: 10 even know he existed.
11 Q So in short, Manny was looped into the efforts 11 Q So as far as you know, Eddy and Manny Chamizo
12 to procure a buyer for the property for the purpose of 12 had never done business together?
13 finding a buyer for the property, not some other 13 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
14 purpose, right? 14 THE WITNESS: Correct. I do not know.
15 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 15 BY MS. FISHFELD:
16 THE WITNESS: Correct. To find a buyer for the 16 Q As far as you know, has Eddy ever tried to do
17 property, not to represent us. 17 business with Manny before negotiating the purchase or
18 BY MS. FISHFELD: 18 sale of the property?
19 Q Well, okay, let me unpack that. 19 A No.
20 You understand that Manny was looped into the 20 Q Do you know how much you would save by not
21 negotiations to sell the property for the purpose of 21 paying a commission when you sell the property?
22 bringing you a potential buyer for the property? 22 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 23 THE WITNESS: That would all depend on the
24 THE WITNESS: Yes. Vince asked Manny if he had 24 terms of the property. That is a vague question. I
25 any buyers for this property as Eddy had told Vince 25 do not know. You would have to be more specific
Page 55 Page 57
1 that if he had any buyers, and terms were correct, 1 because terms, as I mentioned previously, could
2 we would be willing to sell. Just like other 2 change depending on the property, what type of
3 Realtors brought us buyers, if terms were right, we 3 property, the market we're in, the need of the end
4 were willing to sell. The property was not listed. 4 user or the buyer or the seller. I do not have an
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 exact number to be able to provide to you.
6 Q And Eddy spoke directly to Manny, right? 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 A Yes. 7 Q Have you ever been involved in a real estate
8 Q About finding a buyer for the property? 8 transaction where the buyer paid the commission of the
9 A Yes. 9 seller's broker?
10 Q And Manny agreed to find a buyer for the 10 A As I mentioned previously, I have only been
11 property? 11 involved in three transactions. I'm not a real estate
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 12 agent. So I am not involved in sales or purchases of
13 THE WITNESS: Yes. 13 properties, any type of properties, on a normal basis.
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 Q You actually testified that you did play a very
15 Q Did you expect that if Manny found a buyer for 15 active role in the purchase and sale of the property.
16 the property, that he would be paid a commission for 16 A Correct. But you're asking me a general
17 doing so? 17 question if I know of any. And that's why I was
18 A Depending on the terms that we had, Manny would 18 specific to advise you that I have only been part of
19 be paid commissions, but always for it to be above the 19 the ones that I mentioned. I'm not a real estate
20 net that we needed to make and at buyer's expense. 20 agent. So I do not have a general knowledge of how all
21 Q And the commission, like you testified, is based 21 transactions happen. I could only speak for the ones
22 on the terms that are negotiated by that transaction, 22 that I have been part of.
23 right? 23 Q For the ones that you have been a part of, did
24 A Correct. The terms that are negotiated and 24 the buyer ever pay a commission of the seller's broker?
25 accepted. No terms were negotiated or accepted with 25 A Yes.
15 (Pages 54 - 57)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 58 Page 60
1 Q Which one? 1 in regards -- I am more familiar with lending, how
2 A 3251 Ponce de Leon, the property you have in 2 the lending process goes and documents needed for a
3 question. 3 mortgage loan, not for a real estate transaction.
4 Q Okay. Any others? 4 BY MS. FISHFELD:
5 A No. 5 Q When you decide whether to approve a mortgage
6 Q For the other real estate transactions that you 6 loan in connection with a real estate transaction, are
7 were personally involved in, did the seller pay the 7 you privy to whether there is a real estate agent
8 seller's broker? 8 making a commission?
9 A In two of them -- I guess in three of them, yes, 9 A As operations, I do not approve loans. I have
10 and in one of them, no. 10 employees that work in my office, which are called
11 Q And the one you're referring to is 3251, right? 11 underwriters. They are the ones that approve loans. I
12 A Correct. 12 personally do not approve any loans.
13 Q So in every other real estate transaction that 13 Q In the loans that you process, are you privy to
14 you've been a part of, the seller paid the seller's 14 whether there's a real estate agent making a commission
15 broker? 15 on the real estate transaction?
16 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 16 A Once again, I am not a processor. I am
17 THE WITNESS: Correct. Because they had a 17 operation. So I do not process any loans. I have
18 broker that was representing them, correct. 18 processors in my office that process the loans. I do
19 BY MS. FISHFELD: 19 not touch loans or handle them on a daily basis in
20 Q Thank you. Have you ever been involved in a 20 regards to the process and the steps and milestones
21 real estate transaction where the seller had a broker, 21 that are necessary to get that loan to closing.
22 but the seller's broker received no commission at all? 22 Q So what do you do?
23 A As I mentioned previously, I have only been 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
24 involved in four transactions, if you consider the 24 BY MS. FISHFELD:
25 purchase and a sale. 25 Q What is your employment role?
Page 59 Page 61
1 Q That has nothing to do with my question. My 1 A I am a branch manager.
2 question is have -- 2 Q What are the responsibilities in that role?
3 A I already answered you that question and I 3 A The responsibilities in that role of a branch
4 responded and gave you the answer. I told you how 4 manager are making sure -- it's more with the sales
5 three of them, the seller paid his broker and one of 5 staff, making sure if they need any assistance, I am
6 them did not. It's the same question. 6 there to assist them. I make sure that the pipelines
7 MS. FISHFELD: Just a minute. 7 are running smoothly, that loans are closing on time,
8 THE WITNESS: Thank you. 8 that my staff is working on the loans that need to be
9 (A break was taken from 11:37 a.m. to 9 worked on. I have weekly meetings, follow-ups, I --
10 11:38 a.m.) 10 that's what it is. It is more of a managing role.
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 Q Okay. So your familiarity with real estate
12 Q You're a mortgage loan originator, right? 12 transactions is limited to the four real estate
13 A Yes, I am. 13 transactions that you personally have been involved in?
14 Q And in that role, do you review real estate 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
15 transactions? 15 THE WITNESS: Mortgage lending is in the real
16 A No, I do not because I am in operations. So I 16 estate. So there is familiarity. Depends on the
17 am not -- I am a licensed loan originator, but I do not 17 specific of the question that you have, that I would
18 sign any loan applications, so I do not review any 18 be able to answer it to the best of my knowledge on
19 sales contracts. 19 what I do on a daily basis.
20 Q So you don't feel like you are familiar with 20 BY MS. FISHFELD:
21 real estate transactions generally? 21 Q Well, I've been asking you questions about the
22 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. Asked and 22 typical practice in real estate transactions and you've
23 answered. 23 been saying that you're only familiar with the four
24 THE WITNESS: No. I am familiar with real 24 that you were involved in.
25 estate transactions, but not specific transactions 25 A You specified in commercial transactions and I
16 (Pages 58 - 61)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 62 Page 64
1 had not been in any commercial transactions and I do 1 not using a real estate broker, right?
2 not lend in commercial lending either. 2 A Well, my husband is a real estate broker, so
3 Q Okay. So let me see if I understand. So your 3 it's not necessarily saving money, it's just he has the
4 familiarity with commercial real estate transactions is 4 knowledge and we have the tools available. We are able
5 limited to the four commercial real estate transactions 5 to look at everything else that everybody has because
6 that you have personally been involved with? 6 we have the same tools that are available for any
7 A Correct. Yes. Definitely. 7 commercial property. Because we have access to it due
8 Q And your understanding of residential real 8 to his license.
9 estate transactions, is that broader? 9 Q When you say that you have access to all the
10 A Yes. 10 tools that you would need through your husband, who's a
11 Q In what sense? 11 real estate agent, what tools are you referring to?
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 12 A We had -- we have subscriptions to a few
13 THE WITNESS: It's broader in the fact that I 13 commercial tools. I don't know the exact names of
14 know how -- I know how to read a real estate sales 14 them. I believe LoopNet, CREX. There was a few of
15 contract. The times for inspections, the closing 15 them that we would pay monthly fees to be able to get
16 dates, where it says the escrow, where it has the 16 access to these.
17 sales price, the signatures, addendums that are with 17 And we also had like -- and that's how we would
18 residential sales contracts. 18 be able to know what properties were on the market.
19 BY MS. FISHFELD: 19 Even before we even purchased the property in December
20 Q And are you familiar with commissions that are 20 of 2016, we never had a Realtor that was helping us
21 paid on real estate transactions? 21 purchase the property. It was Eddy. And then he got
22 A Yes. They all -- it varies depending on the 22 introduced to Vince and that's why we went with Vince
23 contract, if it's for sale by owner, or if it's a 23 for this property, but we never had anybody
24 listed property. You know, there's different -- it's 24 representing us. We went and looked because we didn't
25 not always a set fee that you see on both sides. It 25 need to. Eddy is a broker.
Page 63 Page 65
1 depends. You would have to just read the contract and 1 Q So you mentioned that at least five real estate
2 see exactly. Sometimes one person is represented by 2 agents contacted you about potential buyers to buy the
3 two people, sometimes it's a for sale by owner or 3 property.
4 sometimes commissions vary. It all depends on the 4 Is it your testimony that all of those real
5 contract that you have and that you're reviewing. 5 estate agents were representing the buyers?
6 Everything is not verbatim. 6 A From my understanding, yes, they were, because
7 Q When you decided that you would be open to 7 they came to look at the property with individuals or
8 selling the property, why didn't you and Eddy just try 8 by themselves to see the property, how it was before
9 to sell it yourself? 9 presenting it.
10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 10 Q Okay. Let's look at some documents.
11 THE WITNESS: Well, we did. That's why we had 11 A Sure. She's going to give them to me in paper
12 other Realtors bring buyers to us. I never said we 12 form, right?
13 didn't. We did. We had buyers. We never had this 13 MS. DE ALEJO: Yes.
14 property exclusively listed with anybody. We had 14 Are you starting with Exhibit 1?
15 buyers -- we had Realtors that brought us buyers and 15 MS. FISHFELD: Yes.
16 presented offers. We definitely did. 16 MS. DE ALEJO: I just printed them out for
17 BY MS. FISHFELD: 17 ease.
18 Q But it's your testimony that you never had a 18 MS. FISHFELD: I think I'm still going to share
19 real estate agent that represented you at any point in 19 my screen.
20 the sale of the property? 20 MS. DE ALEJO: I would ask that you do that so
21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 21 that we make sure we're all on the same page.
22 THE WITNESS: Correct. We never had anybody 22 Again, because you didn't go through the
23 represent us. 23 instructions or like the rules of a deposition, I
24 BY MS. FISHFELD: 24 just want to let Adriana know that you're allowed to
25 Q Okay. Because you could save a lot of money by 25 review the document, ask questions about it, but
17 (Pages 62 - 65)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 66 Page 68
1 take your time to review it. And then let her ask 1 commission in Eddy's text message?
2 her questions. Take your time. If you need to read 2 A He does not specify. But if you read the -- if
3 the whole thing, read the whole thing. That's 3 you go through the story line on the first text, it
4 perfectly acceptable. 4 says there, "if we force the buyer to pay the
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 commission." That is what Eddy was asking, for the
6 Q Okay. On my screen is a document that I'd like 6 buyer to pay the commission, not for us.
7 to enter as Exhibit 1. And it is Lago 21 to 22. I am 7 Q So Vince was asking you as the seller to pay a
8 not saying all of the numbers. 8 seller's commission and Eddy did not refute that in
9 (Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 was marked for 9 this text message, right?
10 identification.) 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 THE WITNESS: Vince is not asking us for the
12 Q I am not saying all the zeros, but it's Lago 21 12 seller to pay it. He is saying that he feels that
13 to 22. Take a look at this document. 13 we would lose the buyer if we force him, for the
14 Now, you're not on this text message and I 14 buyer to pay the commission. That's what Vince is
15 understand that, but I'd like to hear your 15 saying preview to the conversation he had with Eddy
16 understanding of what it means or whether you were 16 when Eddy had advised him that the buyer had to pay
17 involved in any of the decisions or communications that 17 the commission. That is why we go about this text
18 were being made. 18 message.
19 This is a text message between Vince and Eddy. 19 BY MS. FISHFELD:
20 And so based on this text message on March 5th, 2018, 20 Q So --
21 Vince texted Eddy, "I just spoke to Manny. His buyer 21 A Nowhere does Eddy agree to pay the commission.
22 is going to request that the seller pay the commission. 22 If I read correctly, I do not see that it says that
23 Counter at 5.9 firm. I have a feeling we lose the 23 Eddy agrees to pay the commission.
24 buyer if we force the buyer to pay the commission." 24 Q And you also don't see that he's saying the
25 And then Eddy responds, "Net to us 5.8 million. 25 buyer must pay the commission in his text message,
Page 67 Page 69
1 All commissions go on top." 1 right?
2 So in this text message, did Eddy refute that 2 A In Eddy's text message, no. But if you read the
3 the seller would pay all commissions on top? 3 text message chain --
4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 4 Q I am asking about Eddy's text message. I
5 THE WITNESS: In this text message, Eddy -- he 5 understand what you think Vince's text message says.
6 wrote "All commissions go on top." If I read the 6 Eddy does not say that the buyer must pay the
7 previous one it says, we wanted the buyer to pay it, 7 commissions in his text message, right?
8 so the buyer would have to pay the commission. 8 A He says, "all commissions go on top."
9 BY MS. FISHFELD: 9 Q Right. And when Vince is saying that his
10 Q I'm sorry, what? 10 buyer -- Manny's buyer is going to request that the
11 A In the text message it says, "all commissions go 11 seller pay the commission, commission to whom? The
12 on top." What Eddy's response is, "Net to us 5.8. All 12 buyer's broker or the seller's broker?
13 commissions go on top." 13 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
14 Q So he's saying all commissions go on top, 14 She's not a party to this text message.
15 meaning the buyer and the seller's commissions? 15 THE WITNESS: I do not know.
16 A Right. They go on top. He does not specify who 16 MS. DE ALEJO: So, you know...
17 is paying it, but if you read the previous text, we had 17 MS. FISHFELD: You don't know?
18 advised Vince, that the buyer to pay it, and Vince is 18 THE WITNESS: I do not know.
19 trying to convince us that the seller -- that the buyer 19 BY MS. FISHFELD:
20 is not going to accept that, that we should change it. 20 Q Okay.
21 Q Yes. And Eddy responded that all commissions 21 A We cannot assume.
22 would go on top, right? 22 Q In Vince's text message, at the bottom it says,
23 A Correct. That the buyer would pay the 23 "Another option is that we counter at 5.85. Buyer pays
24 commission. 24 their commission, seller pays their commission."
25 Q Where does it say that the buyer would pay the 25 So the seller had a broker in this transaction,
18 (Pages 66 - 69)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 70 Page 72
1 right? 1 Seems to me that there was a seller's commission. Is
2 A I do not remember. 2 that your understanding too?
3 Q Okay. You're not sure whether the seller had a 3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
4 broker or not? 4 BY MS. FISHFELD:
5 A I do not know exactly what contract this text 5 Q Adriana, you're reading this text message. Is
6 message is based on. 6 it your testimony that the seller didn't have a broker?
7 Q Whether the seller had a broker or not is based 7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
8 on the terms of that individual proposal, right? 8 THE WITNESS: That is not my testimony. That's
9 A Correct. Because every contract or letter of 9 not what I said.
10 intent would have different terms. 10 BY MS. FISHFELD:
11 Q So for one offer, maybe you didn't have a 11 Q So based on these text messages, in March 2018,
12 broker, but for another offer, maybe All In One did 12 the seller All In One, had a broker, right? We can
13 have a broker, right? 13 agree on that?
14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
15 THE WITNESS: You mean a broker representing 15 THE WITNESS: If you read the text messages
16 All In One. Is that what you mean? 16 that Vince says, it believes that the seller would
17 BY MS. FISHFELD: 17 have been us. So it is to say that there was a
18 Q Correct. 18 broker that was representing us and providing -- I
19 A Yes, correct. 19 don't know what they were providing. If it was a
20 Q When Eddy says in his text message, "All 20 letter of intent, if this was just a phone call.
21 commissions go on top," what's your understanding of 21 I'm not sure. I do not know.
22 what he meant by that? 22 BY MS. FISHFELD:
23 A That he needed net 5.8 million and his 23 Q Thank you. So we've established that All In One
24 understanding was that the buyer's commission had to be 24 had a broker at this point.
25 paid by the buyer. 25 And is it also true that it appears that the
Page 71 Page 73
1 Q I thought your testimony was that the seller's 1 seller's broker would be paid a commission?
2 commission also had to be paid by the buyer? 2 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form to the
3 A Yeah. All commissions. He writes there all 3 nonquestion that counsel is testifying. And then
4 commissions. 4 object to the form of the question.
5 Q So both the buyer and the seller's commission 5 MS. FISHFELD: Limit to form, please, like you
6 would be paid by the buyer? 6 instructed me during Vince's deposition.
7 A Right. 7 MS. DE ALEJO: Well, just don't testify on the
8 Q So you did have a broker in this transaction? 8 record and I won't need to object to that.
9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 THE WITNESS: Once again, I do not know what 10 Q Adriana, is it true that the seller's broker
11 sales contract or if this is even in reference to a 11 would be paid a commission by someone at this point?
12 sale contract or if this was a letter of intent or 12 A Yes.
13 was this a verbal -- a verbal phone call or this was 13 Q In March 2018?
14 an email. I have not been provided with a document 14 A Correct.
15 to go back to see where these text messages and what 15 Q And the seller's broker was who?
16 time frame this was and what it was relevant to. I 16 A That's a great question. I do not know.
17 do not know. 17 Q Okay. I also see in Eddy's text message the
18 BY MS. FISHFELD: 18 same text that we've been looking at. "Leaseback of a
19 Q The time frame is March 5th, 2018. You can see 19 year or less to find a new building."
20 that right there on the text message. 20 Do you know what that means?
21 A Are you able to provide me a sales contract that 21 A Yes. We had two companies running in that
22 we had on that date that we could reference, so then it 22 building, so we needed to be there -- lease the
23 would be easier for me to answer your question? 23 property for a year to give us time to be able to find
24 Q Not at this time. I am talking about Eddy's and 24 a property to move to. So that's why it was placed
25 All In One's intent based on these text messages. 25 there.
19 (Pages 70 - 73)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 74 Page 76
1 We were not actively looking for a property as 1 Q Go ahead, Adriana.
2 we didn't really have a need to sell the property. 2 A I mean, if you have the contract or the letter
3 That's why 3251 was not listed. Once -- if there was 3 of intent --
4 favorable offers, that's when we started doing due 4 Q No. No. No.
5 diligence and that's when we started looking for 5 Is it your testimony that Vince when he says
6 property, to see where we could move to. And that's 6 "let me speak with their agent," that he was referring
7 why Eddy would ask for a leaseback of a year or less to 7 to Manny?
8 find a new building. Because we were a running company 8 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
9 that needed to be working. Our employees needed a 9 THE WITNESS: Yes.
10 place to work, so we needed to find a place. We were 10 BY MS. FISHFELD:
11 not going to sell without us finding a building or 11 Q Okay. So Manny and Vince were working as a team
12 leasing back the building for a certain period of time 12 at this point, March 2018?
13 for us to be able to give us the opportunity to find a 13 A I never received any letter of intent or sales
14 new building to move our company to. 14 contract that had them as a team leading any sort of
15 Q Did Vince know that you were concerned with 15 commission.
16 having a building to move into? 16 So I mean, they definitely did speak to each
17 A Yes, he did. 17 other and would bring buyers together to the office,
18 Q Did Manny know that you were concerned with 18 but I'm not sure if the buyer was either Manny's or if
19 finding a building to move into? 19 it was Vince's. I was not privy to any of those
20 A I personally did not speak to Manny in regards 20 conversations between them and any agreements they had
21 to that, but we did have emails with him advising him 21 between them.
22 that we did need to find what we would call a plan B. 22 Q So you know that Manny and Vince were working
23 Where would we go? 23 together in some capacity, but you just weren't sure
24 Q Next in the text message thread Vince says, "Let 24 about the specifics of that arrangement?
25 me speak with our agent." 25 A Exactly. I was never provided any information
Page 75 Page 77
1 Do you see that? 1 in regards to how their -- specifics how they were
2 A Yes, I do. 2 working together or never even provided -- even in any
3 Q Who is their agent that he's referring to? 3 letter of intents, they were never, that I received.
4 A I don't know. 4 There was nothing of them ever splitting anything. So
5 Q But it wasn't Manny, right? 5 I'm not sure. I don't know. I don't know what they
6 A I do not know. 6 had. I guess that's something that Manny and Vince
7 Q Well, Vince says at the top, "I just spoke to 7 know, what agreements they had with each other.
8 Manny. His buyer is going to request that the seller 8 Q But they would bring buyers to you together,
9 pay the commission." 9 right?
10 And then Eddy responds and then Vince says, "Let 10 A Not all the time.
11 me speak with our agent." 11 Q How many times?
12 A So I guess Manny was the buyer's agent. 12 A I cannot give you how many, but I could -- I
13 Q Well -- 13 could advise that there was times that Manny would come
14 A Because if it's his buyer, is it referring to 14 by himself. There was times that Vince came by
15 Manny? So was -- 15 himself. I'm not sure if they were -- I'm not privy to
16 Q You think that Vince would refer to Manny as 16 any of the conversations among -- between them two. So
17 their agent even though he just referred to him by his 17 I do not know if Vince just came by himself because
18 name? 18 Manny couldn't or Manny came by himself because Vince
19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 19 couldn't. That, I'm not sure. Like, I can't give you
20 She's already said she's not a party to this text 20 that answer. I do not know.
21 message. You're asking her to speculate as to what 21 Q So at least once, I'll say at least once, Manny
22 is meant by a different text. She's just trying to 22 and Vince brought a buyer to you together?
23 answer your question. She's not a party to the 23 A Yeah. They came to the office together a couple
24 text. It's simple. 24 of times, yes.
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 Q And at least once Vince brought you a buyer by
20 (Pages 74 - 77)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 78 Page 80
1 himself? 1 Q Did he take photos of the property?
2 A Yes. 2 A I do not know.
3 Q And at least once Manny brought you a buyer by 3 Q Did Manny research the sales prices of
4 himself? 4 comparable properties in the surrounding area?
5 A I'm not sure. I'm not sure if Manny brought -- 5 A As a real estate agent, I would believe that
6 I'm sorry, I do not know. 6 under your profession, that is what you need to do if
7 Q Okay. So the only times you can recall when 7 you're interested in showing a buyer a property. I
8 Manny brought you a buyer, it was in conjunction with 8 would have to assume that he did.
9 Vince? 9 MS. DE ALEJO: One of the rules of deposition
10 A Well, there's one time that Manny represented a 10 is we're not to assume; don't speculate.
11 buyer on an LOI that I just recently reviewed and that 11 THE WITNESS: He did not provide to me, Adriana
12 Vince was not representing that same buyer. 12 Fernandez, he did not provide any CMA of the
13 Q So at least once Manny brought you a buyer by 13 property that I owned at that time, 3251.
14 himself? 14 BY MS. FISHFELD:
15 A But Vince was involved as well. That's why I 15 Q Is it your understanding that Manny provided
16 went back and I'm not sure if this -- when you said 16 CMA's to Eddy?
17 this, because if you go to the top message it says, "I 17 A I do not know.
18 just spoke to Manny," his buyer. So it's as if he's 18 Q Did Manny reach out to his network to find a
19 representing the buyer. 19 buyer for the property?
20 Then he says, "Let me speak with their agent;" 20 A Yes, he did as he brought some potential buyers.
21 that's why it was as if the buyer is Manny. I do not 21 Q Did Manny present contract offers to you for the
22 know. 22 sale of the property?
23 Q Okay. So you can't recall an instance when 23 A Yes.
24 Manny brought you a buyer by himself when Vince was not 24 Q How many?
25 involved? 25 A I believe it was two.
Page 79 Page 81
1 A Not to me personally. 1 Q What was the first one?
2 Q So to All In One? 2 A The first one was Red Bridge, was the buyer. I
3 A Not that I can recall. 3 believe he represented the buyer.
4 Q So it seems to you that Manny and Vince were 4 Q What was the second one?
5 working as a team to find All In One a buyer? 5 A The second one was Alex Alvarez.
6 A Correct. But I'm not privy to any conversations 6 Q Did Manny represent Alex Alvarez?
7 that they had. They did not explain to us anything -- 7 A No, he did not. Elizabeth Diaz did.
8 you know, what their understanding was. I'm unaware. 8 Q Did Manny represent the seller in that
9 Q Do you know what sort of work Manny did to try 9 transaction?
10 to procure a buyer for the property? 10 A Yes, he did.
11 A I do not know the exact work that he did. But 11 Q Did Manny assist with the negotiations of the
12 he did have conversations with real estate agents as he 12 terms of the sale to Alex Alvarez?
13 brought individuals to show them the property. So he 13 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
14 had conversations with real estate agents. That is his 14 THE WITNESS: Yes, he did, in part with our
15 profession. He's a commercial real estate agent. 15 attorney, which is the one that revised because we
16 Q Did he show the property to potential buyers? 16 were presented this offer. This was not a sales
17 A Yes, he did. 17 contract that we sat with Manny to do. This was an
18 Q How many times? 18 offer that was presented to us by the buyer.
19 A I cannot recall the amount of times. 19 So we had our attorney review and our attorney went
20 Q At least once? 20 back and forth with changes that we wanted.
21 A Yes. 21 Negotiations fell through.
22 Q More than twice? 22 Then Manny just forwarded like the terms that we had
23 A Yes. 23 been speaking with our attorney that we wanted and
24 Q More than five times? 24 that he was -- he was in the loop. He knew the
25 A I don't think so. 25 changes that we wanted on the contract. But nothing
21 (Pages 78 - 81)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 82 Page 84
1 ever came to fruition. We were never able to 1 language on the contract. He was definitely privy to
2 proceed with the contract because the terms were 2 the conversations that were occurring, but we had
3 never accepted by us and the contract was cancelled. 3 attorneys. Once you have an attorney, your real
4 Well, the contract was never signed, just 4 estate, you know, whoever -- you know, both parties had
5 negotiations were cancelled. Just an email sent 5 attorneys. So attorneys communicate with attorneys.
6 that we were no longer looking forward to closing on 6 Q I understand. So the attorneys were
7 the property. 7 communicating about the terms of the sale and Manny's
8 BY MS. FISHFELD: 8 role was limited to the real estate agent for All In
9 Q Who was your attorney that helped you with the 9 One?
10 negotiations of the sale to Alex Alvarez that you're 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
11 referring to? 11 THE WITNESS: Yes.
12 A Oh, Troy Nader. The Law Office of Troy Nader. 12 BY MS. FISHFELD:
13 Q Did Manny speak with Troy Nader about the 13 Q You said "yes"?
14 negotiations? 14 A Yes. I said yes.
15 A I'm not sure if they had any verbal phone calls, 15 Q When a prospective buyer submitted an offer to
16 but he was in a few emails. 16 All In One, did the buyer submit it directly to you or
17 Q Okay. So Manny would communicate with Mr. Nader 17 Eddy?
18 about the terms of the potential sale? 18 A In what case?
19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 19 Q Well, let's take -- you're right. Actually,
20 THE WITNESS: You have the copy of those, and I 20 let's limit this to the Alex Alvarez offer.
21 believe it was only about one or two communications 21 Was Alex Alvarez represented by a real estate
22 he had with my attorney. My attorney dealt directly 22 agent?
23 with Luis Montello, which was the attorney 23 A Yes.
24 representing the buyer. 24 Q And who was that?
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 A I had just mentioned it earlier. Elizabeth
Page 83 Page 85
1 Q So the answer is yes, Manny communicated with 1 Diaz.
2 Mr. Nader about the negotiations and the terms of the 2 Q Was Alex Alvarez represented by any other real
3 potential sale? 3 estate agent?
4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form. 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
5 THE WITNESS: Yes. I said one or two times. 5 THE WITNESS: Not that I am aware of.
6 BY MS. FISHFELD: 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 Q Approximately, how long did Manny assist with 7 Q When Alex Alvarez' agent, Liz Diaz, submitted an
8 the negotiation of the terms of the sale to Alex 8 offer to purchase the property, did she submit it to
9 Alvarez? 9 Manny?
10 A From my -- it was -- we were in June -- in June 10 A I do not know if she submitted it to Manny or
11 of 2018. 11 Vince. You would have to ask them.
12 Q Was it, approximately, a month? 12 Q Well, did you see the offer received from Liz
13 A Probably like a little less. Like three weeks. 13 Diaz on behalf of Alex Alvarez?
14 Not even because we were given the contract, I believe 14 A From Elizabeth Diaz, no, I did not.
15 on June 4th, and this thing ended on June 20th. So you 15 Q You never saw an offer from Liz Diaz on behalf
16 can't say a month. You would have to say probably 16 of Alex Alvarez?
17 approximately about two and a half weeks. 17 A Yes, of course I did, but I thought you were
18 Q So from, approximately, June 4th to June 20th 18 asking me if she presented it to me directly.
19 Manny was involved in the negotiations of the terms of 19 Q Well, yeah. I mean, that's what I'm getting at.
20 the sale of the property? 20 You at some point reviewed and received an offer
21 A He was the Realtor who was involved more 21 from Alex Alvarez through Liz Diaz, right?
22 hands-on with both attorneys. They were the ones that 22 A Correct. But it was not through Liz Diaz. It
23 were more hands-on trying to change because we were 23 was an offer that Liz Diaz presented, I believe, to
24 just, you know, changing the terms. Agreeing to what 24 Manny and Vince and then they presented it to Eddy and
25 they had to say or us disagreeing, changing the 25 me.
22 (Pages 82 - 85)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 86 Page 88
1 Q Okay. Did you meet with Manny in person to 1 spoke and I'm sure he attempted, like any business
2 discuss the terms of that offer? 2 transaction, he would speak and he would give his input
3 A Yes, I did. 3 as a Realtor wanting to close a transaction.
4 Q Why? 4 Q Did you submit a counteroffer to Alex Alvarez?
5 A Because we needed to go over the contract. They 5 A We did with -- we submitted that counteroffer
6 had a very tight turnaround. It was like the same day 6 with quite a few revisions, not some, quite a few
7 by 5 p.m., which is impossible. And -- 7 revisions and it was ongoing. It wasn't necessarily --
8 Q And because he was your real estate agent, 8 it was a lot of back and forth between the attorneys,
9 right? 9 so it wasn't just one counteroffer; these are six
10 A At that moment, he provided the contract. He 10 things we want to change and they accepted. There was
11 came and represented us with these buyers, so we did 11 a lot of negotiations between both our attorneys. Our
12 not have any agreement with him. 12 counsel would call us. We would speak to him and et
13 Q But he was your real estate agent at that point 13 cetera, et cetera. But we never -- we never were able
14 for the Alex Alvarez offer? 14 to agree on the terms of that contract. We never
15 A For that sales contract that we did not sign or 15 signed any contract with Alex Alvarez in 2018.
16 accept, yes, it's his name on it. 16 Q But you did ultimately sign a contract with Alex
17 Q Okay. How many times did you meet with Manny to 17 Alvarez in 2019, right?
18 go over the contract terms? 18 A Yes, we did.
19 A I could probably remember twice, I believe. I'm 19 Q Did Manny know about that?
20 not too sure. But there was email communications with 20 A Manny ever reached out to us after that
21 our attorney and with me personally, maybe twice. 21 happened. He never continued the relationship. He
22 Q And those meetings were in person, right? 22 never brought us another buyer. He never -- never
23 A Yes. He came to the building, in the conference 23 called us besides the text messages that he sent to my
24 room in the building on 3251. 24 husband in a group that he advised that next time he
25 Q Manny drove to your office building for two 25 would see my husband, he would beat him up and that --
Page 87 Page 89
1 in-person meetings to go over the offer from Alex 1 you know, just a bunch of foul language that I didn't
2 Alvarez? 2 really think an old man would be sending to another man
3 A Yes. 3 in regards to that. It was really out of character, I
4 Q And, approximately, how long was the first 4 believed. But yes, Manny did send quite a few awful
5 meeting? 5 text messages to us, but he never -- he never called us
6 A I'm not sure of the time frame. 6 again to represent us as a buyer. There was no
7 Q Was it more than about an hour? 7 continuation of him wanting to sell the property. He
8 A Most likely. I don't think it would go much 8 just got upset, would send us text messages usually
9 more than that. 9 during happy hour time, send my husband text messages.
10 Q And, approximately, how long was the second 10 And those text messages lasted for a very long time.
11 meeting? 11 Q What do you mean by they lasted for a very long
12 A The second meeting, that I recall, was by myself 12 time?
13 and it was just probably 30 minutes. 13 A The text messages? He did group text messages.
14 Q Did you ever discuss with Manny the terms of the 14 He included Roly Benitez, Vince Lago and Eddy. He sent
15 contract offer by email? 15 text messages -- the first one was June 22nd, 2018. I
16 A Yes. He was -- he was cc'd in some emails and 16 clearly remember because we were getting to my beach
17 then there was emails with the attorneys directly that 17 condo and I had my husband's phone. We had been
18 nobody was cc'd on, not even myself or even Eddy. 18 getting the bags out of the car and I read the text
19 Q Did you ask Manny his input and opinion on the 19 message and I was, like, oh, you've got to be kidding
20 terms of the contract offer? 20 me. This is absurd. Someone, you know, telling my
21 A I do not recall me asking him for his input in 21 husband he's going to beat him up, that the next time
22 regards to the terms. I do not recall. 22 he sees him -- and my husband is not in the best of
23 Q Did he provide his input and his opinions on the 23 health, so as you could imagine, that would make
24 terms? 24 anybody -- not my husband, but it made me nervous that
25 A Oh, definitely. He's a Realtor. I'm sure he 25 if Manny would see him he'd go through with his
23 (Pages 86 - 89)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 90 Page 92
1 harassing text messages that he sent. 1 Chamizo, some in group format that Vince Lago spoke
2 He continued doing that, and then the last one 2 about in last week's deposition harassing my husband
3 that I could recall was September of 2019 while my 3 and threatening my husband. Yes, those are the
4 daughter, Eddy and I were on our way to meet my cousins 4 dates.
5 in Disney World because we were going to go to 5 BY MS. FISHFELD:
6 Halloween in Magic Kingdom and he continued sending 6 Q So there was at least one text message from
7 text messages to my husband letting him know what an 7 Manny to your husband on June 22nd, 2018.
8 asshole he was, that things were going to get bad for 8 And then there was at least one text message in
9 him, et cetera, et cetera. 9 September of 2019 and in between that time, how many
10 Q So there was one text message on June 22nd, 10 other, approximately, text messages did your husband
11 2018. And then the next one was in September 2018? 11 receive from Manny Chamizo?
12 A No. Those are the two I can tell you exact 12 A I would say about a handful of them.
13 dates because I clearly recall because I was holding 13 Q Okay. Were they about the sale of the property?
14 the phone. I was holding it and I was in possession of 14 A I mean, you could interpret them in that way.
15 my husband's phone. 15 Q In response to the handful of text messages that
16 One, because we were changing. We were getting 16 you're testifying your husband received from Manny
17 to the beach and I had his phone and he was putting 17 between June 2018 and September 2019, did your husband
18 down the luggage and the other one was because I was 18 ever tell Manny that he had restarted negotiations with
19 holding the phone and we were driving to Orlando, so I 19 Alex Alvarez?
20 had Waze on and I saw it. 20 A No, he did not.
21 There was quite a few that were during that 21 Q We were talking before about the revisions that
22 time, but those are the two that I can give you 22 you and Eddy had to the offer from Alex Alvarez.
23 specific dates of when they occurred. 23 When you communicated those revisions, did you
24 Q So other than June 2018 and September 2018, 24 submit them through Manny?
25 there were other text messages that your husband 25 A No. The revisions were submitted through Troy
Page 91 Page 93
1 received from Manny? 1 Nader. He's the one that sent them all.
2 A Yes. I am currently under investigation 2 Q Okay, I am going to show you another document.
3 represented by attorneys for text messages that Manny 3 MS. DE ALEJO: Is this Exhibit 2?
4 Chamizo has been identified as the individual sending 4 MS. FISHFELD: Yes.
5 text messages to my husband after he found out that 5 (Plaintiff's Exhibit 2 was marked for
6 when my counsel responded to your law firm and advised 6 identification.)
7 that my husband was undergoing cancer treatment for his 7 MS. FISHFELD: It's 12:35. I was thinking
8 squamous cell keratinizing carcinoma, the police 8 around 1:00 we'll take a lunch break, if that's
9 detective already had that it is Manny Chamizo that 9 fine.
10 sent these text messages to me and that they're coming 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Yes, that's good.
11 from his home. 11 BY MS. FISHFELD:
12 Q Okay. Those that you're referring to were after 12 Q So this document I'd like to enter as Exhibit 2.
13 this litigation was initiated, right? 13 It's marked Bates-stamped AIO11 to 18.
14 A Yes, the initial one. 14 So, Adriana, why don't you take a moment to look
15 Q Adriana, listen carefully to my question. My 15 over the document and let me know when you feel ready
16 question is: Between June 2018 and September 2018, 16 to talk about it.
17 were there other text messages sent to your husband by 17 A I've already reviewed this before. I am ready.
18 Manny Chamizo? 18 Q All right. So I want to go to the end of the
19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. Asked and 19 exhibit, bottom of AIO18, or not the bottom, just
20 answered. 20 AIO18. And it's an email from Manny with the email
21 THE WITNESS: Yeah. The dates that I gave you 21 address of flacommercial@gmail.com.
22 were not September of 2018, it was September of 22 You understand that to be Manny Chamizo?
23 2019. 23 A One hundred percent.
24 So from June 2018 to September 2019, over a year, my 24 Q And it's to Matt Bales. Do you know who Matt
25 husband received several text messages from Manny 25 Bales is?
24 (Pages 90 - 93)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 94 Page 96
1 A No, I do not. 1 tenants. We needed to find somewhere to work from. So
2 Q Okay. Now go to AIO14. And there's an email 2 yes, that's going to be a common theme throughout.
3 dated May 16th, 2018, from Darnie Labrozzi. Do you 3 Q Now go to AIO12. And at the bottom of that
4 know who Darnie Labrozzi is? 4 page, there's an email dated May 17th, 2018, from
5 A From reviewing these documents, she was a 5 Manny. And it says, "Moving the ball forward. Slowly,
6 Realtor that represented a buyer. 6 but moving forward. See language for your lease as
7 Q And in this email from Darnie to Matt Bales, 7 part of the sale."
8 May 16th, 2018, in the second paragraph it says -- 8 Did Manny do a lot of work moving the ball
9 well, in the first paragraph it says, "Edmund would 9 forward and negotiating the sale of the property?
10 like to add the following to the contract." 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
11 Do you understand that to be a reference to Eddy 11 THE WITNESS: Okay, you're going back now to a
12 Fernandez? 12 different contract, correct? Because this has
13 A Edmund? 13 nothing to do with the one you were questioning me
14 Q Yeah. 14 before.
15 A No, I do not. 15 BY MS. FISHFELD:
16 Q Okay. 16 Q Right. This appears to be a different potential
17 A Is there someone else named Edmund? I'm not 17 offer.
18 sure. 18 A Yeah. This is a different potential offer and
19 Q I think it was a reference. 19 he provided language for a lease that he was providing
20 A I don't think so. I don't think so because if 20 really to -- if you read further, and there's various
21 you continue reading, it says that -- it says, "Sorry 21 emails when it comes to this. This is the language
22 this has taken a little bit, but we are still in the 22 that he was providing the listing -- the buyer's agent
23 works with executing the sale of Edmund's building. 23 so the buyer's agent can present us an offer with this
24 Since the contract is contingent on him selling as 24 lease language. But nothing was ever accepted from us
25 well." 25 and we really did not have, in this contract, there was
Page 95 Page 97
1 So I do not believe that Edmund is Eddy 1 really not much negotiations that went back and forth
2 Fernandez. I think that's an incorrect assumption. 2 on this.
3 Q So in the second paragraph of this email, it 3 Q So Manny was providing proposed language to the
4 says, "He would like the contract to state somehow that 4 buyer's agent, right?
5 owner will be renting a certain amount of space back to 5 A Correct, to present us -- for the buyer's agent
6 him. He needs this for his financing. I spoke to 6 to present us the offer. At this moment, we had not
7 Manny about this and he said to please contact him to 7 been presented the offer yet.
8 word this so the seller is also in agreement." 8 Q So Manny was communicating with the buyer's
9 And the subject line of this email is "3251 9 agent on All In One's behalf?
10 purchase contract." 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
11 Do you understand this to be a conversation 11 THE WITNESS: Yes.
12 about AIO's desire to stay in the building after the 12 BY MS. FISHFELD:
13 sale of the building? 13 Q As a real estate agent?
14 A Yes. 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to the form.
15 Q Okay. So as of May 16th, 2018, All In One was 15 THE WITNESS: Yes.
16 interested in renting back a portion of the property 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 from whomever purchases it, right? 17 Q So now on at least two potential offers, Manny
18 A We always were. How I had mentioned previously, 18 Chamizo was acting as All In One's real estate agent,
19 we always were because we had company that worked 19 right?
20 there, so we needed time to find a property. So that 20 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
21 is why the language is there. And there was nothing in 21 THE WITNESS: Yes, he did. He attempted to
22 the market at that time for us to move to so we needed 22 present this, but this never went -- went through.
23 time to be able to find something to be able to move to 23 I don't even know if we ever got the complete
24 as it wasn't just a vacant building or a building that 24 purchase sales contract for this back in May of
25 we had tenants. We had -- you know, we were the 25 2018.
25 (Pages 94 - 97)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 98 Page 100
1 BY MS. FISHFELD: 1 contract yet. We were just reading things that he
2 Q I understand. But on at least two negotiations 2 was going to be sending over to the listing agent to
3 that we've looked at, Manny Chamizo was acting as All 3 prepare the sales contract. So we just -- somebody
4 In One's real estate agent, right? 4 that thoroughly reads everything, so I was trying to
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 make sure that they understood who was going to
6 THE WITNESS: Yes, but we had no exclusivity 6 be -- the seller was not the same entity that was
7 with Manny Chamizo or Vince Lago. 7 going to lease the suite. So once -- if Manny was
8 BY MS. FISHFELD: 8 already sending them the language for the lease, it
9 Q Okay. So back to my question. As All In One's 9 would make sense to them and they wouldn't have to
10 real estate agent in this negotiation, did Manny do a 10 say, well, Manny, you sent me this lease information
11 lot of work to move the ball forward? 11 and now you're going back and changing it to a
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 12 different language. So I was just trying to assist
13 THE WITNESS: From these emails that he 13 Manny so he would know the difference in entity.
14 provided that neither Eddy or I were cc'd on, it 14 That's what my email says.
15 seems that it started on April 17th and ended on 15 MS. FISHFELD: Move to strike as nonresponsive.
16 May 17th. 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 Now, we did not ever go back and do any negotiations 17 Q You testified that it was appropriate in this
18 on our behalf or review the contract to say we're 18 transaction to negotiate the terms through your real
19 not going to accept this or change this on this. It 19 estate agent, right?
20 just -- just went away. It never went into any sort 20 A Yes.
21 of going back and forth to see exactly what language 21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
22 we were going to change or anything like that. I 22 THE WITNESS: Yes, I did.
23 think you'll realize that by reviewing what was 23 BY MS. FISHFELD:
24 provided. 24 Q And as a general matter, it's appropriate to
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 negotiate through your real estate agent, right?
Page 99 Page 101
1 Q So my question is: Did Manny Chamizo do a lot 1 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
2 of work to move the ball forward in the negotiations? 2 THE WITNESS: Yes, it is.
3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 3 BY MS. FISHFELD:
4 THE WITNESS: I do not know. 4 Q You don't negotiate directly with the potential
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 buyer, right?
6 Q When you scroll to the later email threads by 6 A It depends on the initial transactions. Once we
7 scrolling up, Eddy responded to Manny. "Manny, I'm 7 purchased 3251, that Vince represented us, we have
8 sure once the lease has all the information, it should 8 emails that Eddy, which was the buyer, spoke directly
9 work. Thank you. Have a great weekend." 9 with the seller and just cc'd Vince in regards to
10 And then you respond to that email saying, 10 negotiations. So I guess it all depends, Jessica. It
11 "Manny, please clarify to the buyers that the entity 11 really all just depends on the situation.
12 selling the building is a different entity than the one 12 And sometimes your attorney -- on the other
13 that will lease the suite." 13 contract, our attorney was the one that was negotiating
14 Do you see that? 14 more the terms and was in communication with their
15 A Yes, I do. 15 attorney because both parties had attorneys.
16 Q Why didn't you just email the potential buyer 16 Q So once a real estate broker brings you a
17 directly? Why did you ask Manny to clarify that for 17 potential buyer, you as the seller, typically
18 the buyer? 18 communicate through your real estate agent, right?
19 A Why would I if Manny is the one that's 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
20 presenting this offer to us? 20 THE WITNESS: Yes, you communicate through your
21 Q Okay. And it's appropriate to negotiate through 21 real estate agent, but sometimes the buyer's
22 your real estate agent, right? 22 representative might email you directly asking you
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 23 for documents.
24 THE WITNESS: For this transaction at this 24 BY MS. FISHFELD:
25 point, yes, we were -- we didn't even have a 25 Q Okay. So sometimes even though you're
26 (Pages 98 - 101)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 102 Page 104
1 represented by a real estate broker, the buyer might 1 A Yes, I do.
2 talk directly to the seller, right? 2 Q Why does it direct a viewer of this flyer to
3 A Yes. Yeah, I think that that would be 3 contact Manny Chamizo for additional information about
4 reasonable to say. 4 the property?
5 Q That doesn't mean that your broker is no longer 5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
6 your broker, right? 6 THE WITNESS: Because Manny Chamizo wanted to
7 A No, it does not. 7 make a commission on the property and sell the
8 Q Okay. All right. Going back to things that 8 property.
9 Manny did in an attempt to procure a buyer for the 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 property, did Manny ever create marketing materials for 10 Q Yes. I see on here, "100 percent renovated
11 the property to advertise the property? 11 offering price, $5,650,000."
12 A Reading the documentation that was presented, he 12 Do you see that?
13 never emailed it to me directly, but I did see in the 13 A Yes, I do.
14 discovery that you provided a flyer that he did create. 14 Q So it is your recollection that at some point
15 It wasn't sent to me, Adriana Fernandez, directly, but 15 the price was $5,650,000?
16 I did just recently review it. I don't recall seeing 16 A I don't remember.
17 it before. And I could assure you he didn't send it to 17 Q You don't remember the offering price being
18 me directly because I looked through all my emails for 18 around $5.6 million?
19 anything to deal with Manny Chamizo and it was not 19 A We never listed the property, so I do not
20 there, but yes, I have seen this flyer. 20 remember the exact price. The price did change
21 Q So I'm putting on the screen Exhibit 3, a 21 depending on the market, depending on the rehab we had
22 document I'd like to mark as Exhibit 3. 22 already done to the property, sales around. So it's
23 (Plaintiff's Exhibit 3 was marked for 23 not necessarily -- we never had an exact price. I
24 identification.) 24 believe if you look at all the documents provided, the
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 sales price was never affirmative, exact sales price.
Page 103 Page 105
1 Q Is this the flyer that you're referring to? 1 Because everything was a negotiation to see.
2 A Yes, it is. 2 The property was never -- it was never -- it was
3 MS. DE ALEJO: Let me hand the document to the 3 never listed. We never had an exclusive listing for
4 witness, please. 4 this property to put it for sale or any sign outside
5 MS. FISHFELD: Sure. 5 that we were selling the property with a certain sales
6 BY MS. FISHFELD: 6 price on it.
7 Q Have you had an opportunity to review Exhibit 3? 7 Q So do you recall that the price started off at a
8 A Yes, I did. Thank you. 8 certain price, but at some point your asking price went
9 Q So is it your understanding that Manny created 9 up?
10 this? 10 A Yes, definitely. It was -- there was definitely
11 A Yes. It has his name. It has his name on it, 11 a different sales price in mid-2017 when the property
12 yes. 12 hadn't been fully renovated. It was definitely a lower
13 Q And this is a flyer advertising the property, 13 sales price because there was a lot still needed to be
14 right? 14 done in the building. So the price -- it was, you
15 A Yes, it is. 15 know, it was -- it changed. The price was never a set
16 Q For the purpose of procuring a buyer for the 16 price for that building.
17 property? 17 Q Okay. So at some point you and Eddy gave Manny
18 A Yes. 18 an offer price of $5,650,000.00, right?
19 Q Do you know when Manny created this flyer? 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
20 A I do not know. 20 THE WITNESS: I did not.
21 Q On the bottom of the flyer it says, "For 21 BY MS. FISHFELD:
22 additional information, please contact Manny Chamizo 22 Q Did Eddy?
23 III." And it has his phone number and his email 23 A I do not know.
24 address and his physical address there. 24 Q As a real estate agent representing All In One
25 Do you see that? 25 trying to procure a buyer, do you think Manny would've
7 likely need a copy. So right at this point, we're _________| __________| ____________| ________
7
8 not going to. Let us know. I'm not sure how we do _________| __________| ____________| _________
8
9 that remotely, but let me know how that works. _________| __________| ____________| _________
10 MS. FISHFELD: Marlene, you have our 9
_________| __________| ____________| _________
11 information, right? 10
_________| __________| ____________| _________
12 THE COURT REPORTER: Yes. 11
_________| __________| ____________| _________
13 (The taking of the deposition was concluded at 7:04 12
_________| __________| ____________| _________
14 p.m.) 13
15 _________| __________| ____________| _________
14
16 _________| __________| ____________| _________
15
17 _________| __________| ____________| _________
16 State of Florida ) _____________
18 County of ) Notary Public
19 17
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read
20 18 my deposition transcript, and it is true and correct
subject to any changes in form or substance entered
21 19 here.
20 ___________ ______________________
22 Date Signature
23 21
22
24 23
24
25 25
Page 251
1 VERITEXT FLORIDA REPORTING COMPANY
2 South Biscayne Boulevard
2 Suite 2250
Miami, Florida 33131
3 (305) 371-1884
(305) 377-1100 (fax)
4
January 26, 2021
5
Adriana Fernandez
6 C/O ALEXANDRA DE ALEJO, ESQ.
Gray Robinson, P.A.
7 333 Southeast 2nd Avenue
Suite 3200
8 Miami, Florida 33131
9 RE : MDLV Vs. All In One
DEPO OF: Adriana Fernandez
10 TAKEN : January 13, 2021
Number of pgs: 247
11 Available for reading until: February 27, 2021
12 Dear Ms. Fernandez,
13 This letter is to advise you that the transcript of
your deposition is completed and is available for
14 reading and signing.
15 Please make an appointment to come to our office at
Suite 2250, 2 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida
16 to read and sign the transcript. Our office hours are
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 8:30
17 Depending on the length of the transcript, you should
allow yourself sufficient time for review.
18
If the reading and signing has not been completed prior
19 to the above-reference date, we shall conclude that you
have waived the reading and signing of the deposition
20 transcript.
21 Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.
22 Sincerely,
23
MARLENE GUTIERREZ
24 CC: Jessica Johnson Fishfeld
25
2 (Pages 2 - 5)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 6 Page 8
1 DIRECT EXAMINATION 1 Q. I understand that relatively recently he has
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 taken a step back from the day-to-day involvement with
3 Q. Hi, Adriana. How are you? 3 All In One due to his current health condition, right?
4 A. I am good, and yourself, Jessica? 4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Good. 5 Q. You are now the person who controls the
6 I just wanted to take a minute before we start 6 day-to-day operations of that entity?
7 to acknowledge that this is a little bit procedurally 7 A. Yes.
8 awkward because I have already deposed you in your 8 Q. In June 2019, All In One sold a property at
9 personal capacity. Understand that I may ask you some 9 3251 Ponce de Leon, right?
10 questions that you feel like I have already asked you, 10 A. Yes.
11 and that's because I probably have. As I am sure you 11 Q. In connection with that sale, All In One did
12 have gone over with your own counsel, but just to get on 12 not pay any commission to any broker, right?
13 the same page, you're here today as the corporate 13 A. Yes.
14 representative of All In One, so you are wearing a 14 Q. Yes, it did not pay any commission, right?
15 little bit of a different hat. 15 A. Correct. It did not.
16 I am aware of your husband's health condition, 16 Q. I understand that in around May or June 2018,
17 and I am very, very sorry to hear about that. I can 17 the property at 3251 Ponce de Leon was not listed on the
18 only imagine this is a very difficult time for you. 18 market, right?
19 Part of the reason why I asked for a corporate 19 A. What year? I'm sorry. I didn't hear the
20 representative deposition is to hopefully see what 20 year.
21 testimony I can get from you and then, hopefully, lessen 21 Q. May or June 2018.
22 the burden on him entirely, if possible, so that he does 22 A. No, it was not listed.
23 not have to go through a deposition, if we can make that 23 Q. When I say "the property," unless I say
24 happen. 24 otherwise, I will always be talking about 3215 Ponce
25 Let's then go ahead and just open up tab 1 to 25 de Leon, okay?
Page 7 Page 9
1 go over the notice of deposition. 1 A. Yes. Understood.
2 (Thereupon, Tab 1, Notice of Taking Deposition 2 Q. I understood from your prior testimony that in
3 was remotely introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 for 3 or around May or June 2018 All In One had not made any
4 Identification.) 4 affirmative concrete decision to sell the property at
5 BY MS. FISHFELD: 5 that time, right?
6 Q. This is Exhibit 1, Adriana. Have you seen 6 A. Correct. We were just looking at offers that
7 this before? 7 were being presented to us.
8 A. Yes, I have. 8 Q. And if someone had offered you the right price
9 Q. Do you understand that you are here testifying 9 for the property, you would consider it, right?
10 today on behalf of All In One Investment Properties, 10 A. Yes. Most definitely.
11 LLC? 11 Q. But you had not listed it as a public listing.
12 A. Yes, I do. 12 A. It had not been listed, no.
13 Q. Did you take a look at the topics that were 13 MS. FISHFELD: Let's take a look at tab 2.
14 listed on Exhibit A to the notice of taking deposition? 14 This will be marked as Exhibit 2, please.
15 A. Yes, I did. 15 MS. DE ALEJO: Jessica, can you identify it by
16 Q. Do you feel that you are reasonably 16 the Bates numbers as well?
17 knowledgeable about the topics listed here? 17 MS. FISHFELD: This is tab 2, which will be
18 A. Yes, I am. 18 Exhibit 2, and it is MDLV 45 to 46.
19 Q. You are a managing member of All In One 19 (Thereupon, Tab 2, MDLV 45-46 was remotely
20 Investment Properties, LLC, right? 20 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 2 for Identification.)
21 A. Yes. 21 BY MS. FISHFELD:
22 Q. And your husband is as well? 22 Q. Have you ever seen this e-mail before?
23 A. Yes. 23 A. Yes. I reviewed it with my counsel.
24 Q. What is your husband's full name? 24 Q. On the bottom of the first page, MDLV 45,
25 A. His name is Eduardo Osvaldo Fernandez. 25 there is an e-mail from Manny, to Elizabeth Diaz, dated
3 (Pages 6 - 9)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 10 Page 12
1 May 28, 2018, right? 1 agreements with any particular realtor in any of these
2 A. Yes. 2 transactions. It's just in the real estate market, they
3 Q. Do you recognize those e-mail addresses as 3 knew that if the offer would be good, that we would sell
4 being from Manny and to Elizabeth Diaz? 4 the property. So if they had anybody as a buyer, they
5 A. Yes. 5 would bring them. If they spoke with somebody else,
6 Q. In the e-mail, Manny says to Liz, "Those are 6 they would bring them to look at the property and see if
7 the only plans I have," and he sends her some 7 we would be willing to negotiate with the terms that
8 information about the property, including the lot size. 8 they would be offering usually in the letter of intent
9 Then the next paragraph down, he says, "Everything else 9 or just an e-mail or just phone conversation once they
10 I can get you with an offer. I know I mentioned it and 10 were seeing the property.
11 I know that my advice at times seems like a negotiation 11 We did not at that time have the property
12 tool, but in this case it is not. On this property, the 12 listed. I think that is why he puts "off-market deal."
13 offer needs to be full asking price or the buyer is 13 It was because the property is not listed.
14 wasting his and our time. Since this is an off-market 14 Q. Why didn't All In One list the property at
15 deal that the only way to move the seller is by agreeing 15 this time?
16 to his asking price. I can't stress this enough." 16 A. We weren't sure if we were going to be selling
17 Do you see that? 17 or not. It was: If he brings something that looks good
18 A. Yes, I do. 18 that we could agree with the terms and the sales price,
19 Q. Is it correct that in May 2018, Manny Chamizo 19 we will sell. It wasn't that we needed to sell or that
20 was showing the property to potential purchasers as an 20 we 100 percent wanted to sell at that moment.
21 off-market deal? 21 Q. So how would listing the property have changed
22 A. He presented the property to various clients 22 those circumstances?
23 of his. In some, he represented the buyer himself. He 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
24 knew that we were willing to sell if the terms were 24 THE WITNESS: If we would have listed the
25 right. 25 property, we would have committed to an agent that
Page 11 Page 13
1 Q. Do you know who Liz Diaz is? 1 would have listed the property for us or we would
2 A. Yes, I do. 2 have listed the property as broker ourselves. You
3 Q. She was representing Alex Alvarez, right? 3 have the property out on the market and everybody
4 A. Yes, she was. 4 that is a real estate agent would have had the
5 Q. Liz Diaz is a broker? 5 opportunity to view the property and to be able to
6 A. Yes, she is. I don't know if she is a broker 6 contact us to come and look at the property.
7 or a real estate agent. I am not sure of her category. 7 We did not list it, as it wasn't something
8 Q. She is a broker, but understood. 8 concrete that we wanted to do at that time. We
9 So Liz Diaz was representing the potential 9 were willing to sell if the price was right and the
10 buyer in this situation, right? 10 negotiation and the terms were to our liking. We
11 A. Yes. 11 were willing to sell. So it wasn't something that
12 Q. And Manny was representing the seller? 12 we were completely opposed to. We were willing,
13 A. In this situation, Manny and Vince were 13 and that is why we accepted letters of intent and
14 working this together as a team. 14 we allowed realtors to bring buyers to the building
15 Q. Representing the seller? 15 to look at the building. This happened throughout
16 A. Correct. 16 2017 and 2018.
17 Q. Is it correct that Manny was showing the 17 BY MS. FISHFELD:
18 property to potential purchasers as an off-market deal? 18 Q. I think you mentioned in your last response
19 A. Yes. 19 that if you had listed it, you would have gotten a
20 Q. What is an off-market deal? 20 listing agent or you would have listed it yourself. Is
21 A. It's not listed. Various realtors knew that 21 that different from what Manny Chamizo was doing here at
22 we would be willing to sell the property if they brought 22 this time by presenting offers as an off-market deal?
23 a buyer that was -- that would be with the terms that we 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Form.
24 wanted at that time. So the property was never listed. 24 THE WITNESS: He wasn't our exclusive agent.
25 So it was not necessarily to say that we had any listing 25 As a matter of fact, he wasn't even the initial
4 (Pages 10 - 13)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 14 Page 16
1 person that we spoke to initially. It was Vince. 1 that they are going to sell it for, and the amount
2 Then Vince brought him along saying that they were 2 of time that the agent's broker is going to list
3 a team and that they worked together. We never 3 the property for them in different sorts of
4 communicated with Manny initially to let him know 4 platforms.
5 that if he ever had a buyer, that we were willing 5 They usually will get weekly reports on what
6 to sell. 6 has happened in their property, what is the
7 I mean it wasn't only them two. We did 7 movement, how many people have reached out to see
8 initially -- in the beginning of 2017, we did have 8 if they want the property or want to come see the
9 the suites listed for lease with another realtor. 9 property. It's a little more in depth in regards
10 There, we did have an agreement. He also presented 10 to an off-market deal.
11 some offers to us. We had other realtors that 11 An off-market deal is a seller that is willing
12 presented offers as well during this time frame. 12 to sell, but not necessarily wants to sell. If
13 BY MS. FISHFELD: 13 they are brought an offer that is worth selling,
14 Q. Who was the real estate agent that was 14 they will sell, which in that case was us. At that
15 representing you in connection with leasing the suite? 15 time, we were willing to sell if the offer was
16 A. That was in 2017, and his name was Tom Smith. 16 right.
17 Q. When did that engagement end? 17 We also had to take into consideration all the
18 A. It was six months, so I would say probably 18 repairs that we had done to the building, sit down
19 sometime in mid-2017. 19 with our CPA to be able to go over when the offer
20 Q. How was what Tom Smith was doing different 20 would come in, if it was an acceptable offer due to
21 from what Manny was doing when he was presenting this 21 the tax repercussions that you are given because of
22 property as an off-market deal? 22 the depreciation that was put into the property.
23 A. Tom Smith had a listing agreement with us. On 23 So it was all dependent on the transaction due to
24 a weekly basis he would send us how he had promoted -- 24 all those different components.
25 well, we first had, like, a signed agreement with him. 25 BY MS. FISHFELD:
Page 15 Page 17
1 It was for leasing; it wasn't to sell the property. He 1 Q. You mentioned that for a listed property you
2 would send us reports on a weekly basis of who gets 2 would get weekly reports from a listing agent. Do you
3 shown the property, of the prospective clients that were 3 get weekly reports from a real estate agent in
4 going to look at the property. We would meet with him. 4 connection with an off-market deal?
5 We were offered a few leases. Nothing ever happened 5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
6 with them, but he would just sit with us and we would go 6 THE WITNESS: We did not get anything. When
7 over the different documentation. 7 it dealt with whatever realtor it was for an
8 In Manny Chamizo's case with Vince Lago, 8 off-market deal, it was just whatever the deal was,
9 sometimes Vince would show the property because he had a 9 they would tell us, "Oh, they like it. They want
10 buyer. And then when this buyer came along, it was 10 to go see the property. Could we pass by? Is this
11 Vince and Manny that came with the buyer. I am not sure 11 time fine for you guys to pass by? This is what
12 if they both walked the property together with the buyer 12 they are thinking about offering."
13 or not. It was different because we never had any sort 13 We would say, "Okay, have them present
14 of written agreement with him or a selling agreement 14 whatever the offer is."
15 saying that they were going to be listing the property 15 They don't need to do that because they are
16 for us. That's why he called it an off-market deal. It 16 not, in essence, contractually obligated to be able
17 wasn't a property that was listed. 17 to give us weekly reports on what they are doing
18 Q. I guess what I am asking is: What is the 18 for the property because we don't have an agreement
19 difference between an off-market deal and a listed 19 for them to list the property. It would be wasting
20 property? 20 their time to do so.
21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 21 BY MS. FISHFELD:
22 THE WITNESS: Well, a listed property is a 22 Q. So the role of a real estate agent in
23 property that is listed in different platforms and 23 connection with a listed property is different from the
24 that the seller has an agreement with its agent in 24 role of an agent in connection with an off-market deal?
25 regards to what they want to sell it for, the terms 25 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
5 (Pages 14 - 17)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 18 Page 20
1 THE WITNESS: In regards to representing the 1 also change, depending on the conversations that
2 seller, yes, it is. 2 you have with your listing agent, as the seller.
3 BY MS. FISHFELD: 3 BY MS. FISHFELD:
4 Q. When you list a property on the market, can 4 Q. Is it right that a main reason why you would
5 you generally get more money for the property? Can you 5 want to list the property is because you would want a
6 ask for a higher price? 6 real estate agent that was committed to the property and
7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 7 bound by contractual terms to give you weekly updates
8 THE WITNESS: Anybody can list a property at 8 and run CMAs and the other things you mentioned?
9 whatever they think is feasible and whatever they 9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
10 want to list the property. At the end of the day, 10 THE WITNESS: I mean, that would be one of the
11 you have to have a buyer that is willing and able 11 reasons that we would do that. It would be because
12 to pay for whatever you're listing the property 12 there would be somebody dedicated to the property
13 for. You could think your property is worth X and 13 solely. I can't speak for others, but that is the
14 get offers that are very far off from X. Depending 14 general rule for hiring a real estate agent to
15 on the market, you might get offers that are higher 15 represent you.
16 because the market is a seller's market and there 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 are not enough properties. 17 Q. In a listing.
18 So that is a very generic question in regards 18 A. Yes, in a listing.
19 to a specific answer because I think it all depends 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
20 on the time frame and what is happening in our 20 THE WITNESS: A real estate agent should be
21 economy and in the real estate market to be able to 21 looking out for you. If they are hired as your
22 give you an accurate answer of what you are able to 22 real estate agent, they are always looking for your
23 list a property for and what you are going to get 23 best interest. What is the best interest of my
24 in return. It depends on how many properties there 24 client? How could I have my client's best interest
25 are on the market at the time. 25 at heart to get them the best deal for their
Page 19 Page 21
1 BY MS. FISHFELD: 1 listing or for the purchase that they want to do?
2 Q. So it is not a general rule of thumb that by 2 They represent you solely. They don't have
3 listing the property you would likely get more money for 3 any other motives. They are representing you.
4 the property? 4 BY MS. FISHFELD:
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 Q. Your answer that you just gave, is it with
6 THE WITNESS: Not that I am aware of. 6 respect to, in particular, a listing agent?
7 BY MS. FISHFELD: 7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
8 Q. Is a reason to list a property versus leaving 8 THE WITNESS: No. Just agents in general.
9 it as an off-market deal to market it to different 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 clientele? 10 Q. I am asking, is a reason why you would list
11 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 11 the property so that you would have a real estate agent
12 THE WITNESS: A reason to list the property is 12 who had agreed to give weekly reports and run CMAs and
13 to be able to have somebody that is solely 13 do all the other things you mentioned?
14 dedicated to that property and is willing to show 14 A. Yes. Of course.
15 the property to potential buyers, is willing to 15 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
16 market the property, will do different types of -- 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 just marketing overall, an analysis on the 17 Q. Because a real estate agent would not do all
18 property, and will run CMAs for you to see any 18 of those things for just an off-market deal, right?
19 closed sales, will give you reports on properties 19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
20 that have sold recently so you know what the market 20 THE WITNESS: Right. Because they are not
21 is at that time. 21 dedicated to you. They are not dedicated to -- you
22 As we all know, the market can change from one 22 don't have a contractual agreement with them. They
23 month to the next. Usually, these listing 23 are not dedicated to give you the reports that you
24 agreements, the majority of them, are a six-month 24 might want, having someone that you have a listing
25 listing agreement that you sign. Those terms could 25 agreement with and that they are solely listing
6 (Pages 18 - 21)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 22 Page 24
1 your property and marketing your property in all 1 Q. Let's look at tab 3. This will be Exhibit 3,
2 different types of platforms. 2 please. This is MDLV 151 to 172.
3 BY MS. FISHFELD: 3 A. Okay.
4 Q. When you say a real estate agent who is 4 (Thereupon, Tab 3, MDLV 151-172, Purchase and
5 helping you with an off-market deal is not dedicated to 5 Sale Agreement was remotely introduced as Plaintiff's
6 you, what do you mean by that? 6 Exhibit 3 for Identification.)
7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 7 BY MS. FISHFELD:
8 THE WITNESS: Okay. This property -- well, he 8 Q. Why don't you take a second to look at it and
9 calls it an off-market deal because he knew that we 9 let me know if you recognize what this document is.
10 were willing to sell, Manny and Vince both. They 10 Just to help orient you, if you look at MDLV 169, there
11 knew that we were willing to sell, just like other 11 is a signature from Alejandro Alvarez, May 31, 2018, and
12 agents did, and they brought us offers and we would 12 no signature from All In One.
13 either accept them or not. 13 A. Yes.
14 In documents that you have and that you have 14 Q. Is this an offer to purchase the property from
15 reviewed, you will see that there are offers that 15 Alex Alvarez?
16 were presented by Manny and by Vince that sometimes 16 A. Yes.
17 they represented the buyer and sometimes they put 17 Q. Did Manny Chamizo present you this offer?
18 themselves under the seller's side. It was all 18 A. This offer was presented to us by Vince Lago
19 different offers that were being brought to us and 19 and Manny Chamizo.
20 none of the terms were ever agreed on because there 20 Q. Did they present it to you in person?
21 were continuous negotiations. 21 A. I do not recall if it was in person or if they
22 BY MS. FISHFELD: 22 e-mailed it to us.
23 Q. This is not at all related to my question, 23 Q. So this was an offer presented to All In One
24 Adriana. I asked you what do you mean by dedicated. In 24 by Manny Chamizo and Vince Lago as part of an off-market
25 your answer, when you used the phrase that a real estate 25 deal, right?
Page 23 Page 25
1 agent in an off-market deal is not dedicated to you, 1 A. Yes. Correct.
2 what does that mean? 2 Q. With respect to this offer, Elizabeth Diaz was
3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 3 the real estate agent representing the buyer, right?
4 THE WITNESS: He does not have an obligation 4 A. Yes.
5 to do any of the marketing materials for our 5 Q. And Manny Chamizo was the real estate agent
6 property. He does not have an obligation to 6 representing All In One with respect to this potential
7 contact us on a weekly basis, he or she, to give us 7 deal, right?
8 updates on the property. He does not have an 8 A. Both Vince Lago and Manny Chamizo.
9 obligation to provide us with current market 9 Q. Before Manny and Vince presented you this
10 standings to see how the market is doing at a 10 offer from Alex Alvarez, no one from All In One had ever
11 particular time. He or she does not have an 11 discussed a potential sale of the property with Alex
12 obligation to give us information on properties 12 Alvarez, right?
13 that might have sold near our area that will either 13 A. No.
14 raise our sales price or lower our sales price. 14 Q. No, it had not?
15 This was just: If you have a client, you 15 A. No, we had not.
16 bring the client. So yes, there is definitely a 16 Q. So All In One became aware that Alex Alvarez
17 difference by someone just bringing you one client 17 was interested in purchasing the property through Manny
18 or somebody representing you to sell your property. 18 Chamizo, right?
19 BY MS. FISHFELD: 19 A. Through Manny and Vince Lago, yes.
20 Q. Understood. Manny Chamizo was not a listing 20 Q. Did All In One review this offer and the
21 agent for All In One, right? 21 terms, the proposed terms?
22 A. No. We never had a listing agent. 22 A. Yes, we did.
23 Q. And Vince Lago was not a listing agent for All 23 Q. Were there changes that All In One wanted to
24 In One, right? 24 make to the proposed terms?
25 A. No, he was not. 25 A. Yes.
7 (Pages 22 - 25)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 26 Page 28
1 Q. Did All In One send edits back to the buyer? 1 the first time with our attorney.
2 A. Our attorney did. 2 Q. Item 5 on the list says: "Section 16
3 Q. Who was your attorney? 3 brokerage commission. Please delete the sentence
4 A. The attorney was Troy Nader. 4 starting with at and upon closing and ending with the
5 Q. Let's go to tab 4, which will be Exhibit 4, 5 purchase price. Please replace with as agreed to by the
6 please. 6 seller and the two brokers, each broker will be entitled
7 A. Diaz 92? 7 to a commission of $100,000 or a total commission of
8 Q. Yes, Diaz 92 to 96. 8 $200,000 upon the closing of this transaction."
9 A. Okay. 9 Do you see that?
10 (Thereupon, Tab 4, DIAZ 92-96 was remotely 10 A. Yes, I do.
11 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 4 for Identification.) 11 Q. So is it right that the buyer had submitted a
12 BY MS. FISHFELD: 12 contract requesting a broker commission of 2 percent,
13 Q. You can look at this whole e-mail thread, if 13 but All In One asked for that to be changed to a
14 you would like. I will be focusing on Diaz 95. 14 commission of $100,000 to each broker?
15 A. Okay. 15 A. Correct.
16 Q. So on Diaz 95, there is an e-mail from Troy 16 Q. And is it right that it says that the seller,
17 Nader, to Louis Montello, dated June 4, 2018, right? 17 All In One, will pay the commission to each broker?
18 A. Yes. 18 A. No. The modification from our attorney does
19 Q. Have you seen this e-mail before? 19 not say that.
20 A. Yes. 20 Q. Okay. It says: "As agreed to by the seller
21 Q. You recognize these e-mails as being from Troy 21 and the two brokers," right?
22 Nader and to Louis Montello, right? 22 A. Right. But it does not specify who will be
23 A. Yes, I do. 23 paying for it. It was written later by the buyer's
24 Q. As we just discussed, Troy Nader was All In 24 attorney.
25 One's attorney? 25 Q. This e-mail was written by your attorney,
Page 27 Page 29
1 A. Yes. 1 correct?
2 Q. And Louis Montello was the buyer's attorney? 2 A. Correct. Which does not specify who will be
3 A. Yes. 3 paying it.
4 Q. So your attorney, Troy Nader, sends an e-mail 4 Q. It says: "As agreed to by the seller and the
5 to the buyer's attorney. He says, "There seems to be 5 two brokers."
6 some confusion in the contract." 6 At this time, the agreement between All In One
7 What is he referring to there? 7 and Manny Chamizo was that if this deal closed with Alex
8 A. It was in the section with regards to who 8 Alvarez, he would be paid a commission of $100,000,
9 would be the tenant of the building. Of who was the 9 right?
10 tenant of the building. 10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
11 Q. And that is because All In One was the owner 11 THE WITNESS: It was not specified in that
12 of the building, but the tenant was one of All In One's 12 section that our attorney responded back to the
13 affiliate entities? 13 buyer's attorney who would be paying the total of
14 A. It was another company that we own. 14 $200,000 commission.
15 Q. Is he referring to the draft contract that All 15 BY MS. FISHFELD:
16 In One had sent -- I am sorry. The draft contract that 16 Q. My question was: Was the agreement between
17 Alex Alvarez had sent All In One? 17 All In One and Manny Chamizo at this time that if the
18 A. Yes. 18 deal closed with Alex Alvarez, Manny Chamizo would be
19 Q. And he says in the last sentence of the first 19 paid a $100,000 commission?
20 paragraph, "Please find below changes required to the 20 A. No. We did not have an agreement with him.
21 contract." 21 Q. So what does it mean, "As agreed to by the
22 So are these the changes that All In One 22 seller and the two brokers"?
23 wanted to make to the proposed contract? 23 A. That is the language that was on the initial
24 A. Yes. These were the initial changes that we 24 contract that they submitted to us. If we go to the
25 wanted to make when we initially reviewed the contract 25 section -- let's go. Hold on. Now I can't find it.
8 (Pages 26 - 29)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 30 Page 32
1 MS. DE ALEJO: MDLV 165. 1 A. He wrote "As agreed to by the seller and the
2 THE WITNESS: It said Number 5 and I was 2 two brokers." That was to lower the commission to
3 looking for Section 5. That's why I got confused. 3 $100,000, each of them. That is what it was for.
4 BY MS. FISHFELD: 4 Q. So the agreement was that the brokers would
5 Q. My question is directed to Exhibit 4 that we 5 not be entitled to a 2 percent commission. Instead,
6 are talking about right now. The e-mail says: "Please 6 they would be entitled to $100,000.
7 replace with as agreed to by the seller and the two 7 A. Well, we were putting in those modifications.
8 brokers." What does that mean? 8 Nothing had been signed or agreed upon. These are
9 A. That the amount of commission was lowered from 9 changes that we sent over, which nothing was ever agreed
10 2 percent to $100,000 each. 10 upon at the end of the day. But yes, these are all
11 Q. That is the change that All In One was 11 changes and modifications while we were in contract.
12 requesting? 12 Q. At this time, the understanding was that All
13 A. Correct. For the commission to be lowered 13 In One would pay a commission of $100,000 to each broker
14 from 2 percent to $100,000 each. 14 if the deal closed.
15 Q. Okay. So at this time, the agreement between 15 A. That is not what we wrote there. We had
16 the seller and the two brokers was that each broker 16 agreed to lower the commission. We had not put who was
17 would be paid a commission of $100,000, right? 17 going to be paying. If you look at Section 16, Number
18 A. The agreement was that -- the request. It 18 5, we did not put who is going to be paying the amount.
19 wasn't an agreement. It was a request from our attorney 19 We had just lowered the amount.
20 to their attorney to lower the commission to $100,000. 20 Q. So at this time, you never intended to pay
21 Q. That was a request to add to the -- 21 Manny Chamizo this commission; is that right?
22 A. It was a change. It was a modification that 22 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
23 the attorney sent to the other attorney to modify upon 23 THE WITNESS: At this time, we had not come to
24 our initial review of the contract. 24 an agreement on who was going to be paying this
25 Q. And it was in fact added to the contract, 25 commission.
Page 31 Page 33
1 right? 1 BY MS. FISHFELD:
2 A. It was in fact added, but the language was a 2 Q. Was All In One going to pay the commission?
3 little different when it was added to the contract. 3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
4 Q. I think that we are getting a little bit ahead 4 THE WITNESS: At this time, we had not come to
5 of ourselves. I am talking about this e-mail on 5 any agreement on who was going to be paying the
6 Exhibit 4 that we are looking at. This is the edit that 6 commission.
7 All In One asked the buyer's attorney to add into the 7 BY MS. FISHFELD:
8 draft contract, right? 8 Q. So it wasn't All In One?
9 A. Yes. 9 A. We had not come to an agreement yet.
10 Q. It says: "As agreed to by the seller and the 10 Q. Who did you think was going to be paying the
11 two brokers." Do you see that? 11 commission at this time?
12 A. Yes, I do. 12 A. It was dependent on how the contract would be
13 Q. It says: "Each broker will be entitled to a 13 negotiated and the terms of the contract, if it was
14 commission of $100,000." Do you see that? 14 going to be the buyer or the seller. It all depended on
15 A. Yes, I do. 15 the changes that were going to be going on in the
16 Q. Okay. Is it right that there was an agreement 16 contract.
17 between the seller and the two brokers? 17 Q. These are the changes, right?
18 A. There was -- 18 A. These are the initial changes.
19 Q. Why did -- 19 Q. At this time, June 4, 2018 --
20 A. -- not an agreement. 20 A. Yes. That is the first revision. It is the
21 Q. I am sorry. Go ahead. 21 first time that we reviewed the contract with our
22 A. Yes. I previously answered your question. 22 attorney, and these were the first changes that we
23 There was not an agreement. 23 initially saw. We didn't agree to anything and we did
24 Q. Okay. Why did your attorney write that there 24 not sign anything to go forward with the contract. We
25 was? 25 wanted to see these changes, and then review it again
9 (Pages 30 - 33)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 34 Page 36
1 with our attorney to continue on. 1 A. Yes, I do.
2 Q. On June 4, 2018, who did All In One think 2 Q. But All In One did not intend to pay any
3 would be paying the commission to the brokers that is 3 commission to either broker, right?
4 referenced in this e-mail? 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
5 A. The buyer. 5 THE WITNESS: Correct.
6 Q. So at this time, June 4, 2018, All In One did 6 BY MS. FISHFELD:
7 not believe it would be paying any commission to any 7 Q. Is that why All In One decided not to accept
8 broker. 8 the contract?
9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 9 A. We decided not to accept the contract for
10 THE WITNESS: Correct. 10 various reasons. It wasn't only on our side. We needed
11 (Thereupon, Tab 5, AIO 424-445, Purchase and 11 to find a plan B. We needed to find a property for us
12 Sale Agreement was remotely introduced as Plaintiff's 12 to be able to move our business to. We also added after
13 Exhibit 5 for Identification.) 13 another change that we did with an affidavit to the
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 seller, and the seller was not in agreement with the
15 Q. Let's go to tab 5. This is AIO 424 to 445. 15 affidavit. Sorry. We were the sellers. That is to
16 Do you recognize this document? 16 say, the buyer was not in agreement to the affidavit
17 A. Yes, I do. 17 that we added to the contract and didn't want to sign
18 Q. What is it? 18 it. I was getting a lot of push-back to our attorney.
19 A. It's a marked-up sales contract. It's a 19 After speaking to our attorney and our CPA in
20 marked-up sales contract with modifications. 20 regards to the repercussions that would happen if we
21 Q. It has stamped across it "ML draft 6-14-18 21 wouldn't find a replacement property and the buyer not
22 marked." Do you see that? 22 wanting to sign the affidavit and us having those
23 A. Yes. That was their attorney, the buyer's 23 additional monies in escrow, we decided that it was not
24 attorney. 24 the right timing for us to move forward.
25 Q. Does this appear to be a revised version of 25 Q. You mentioned that one of the reasons why you
Page 35 Page 37
1 the contract? 1 did not accept the contract was because you needed to
2 A. Yes. It has modifications, yes. It has some 2 find a replacement property, and another one was that
3 things in red also. 3 the buyer was not willing to sign an affidavit. Are
4 Q. Does it appear to make the changes that your 4 those the two reasons why All In One did not accept the
5 lawyer requested in the June 4, 2018, e-mail we just 5 contract?
6 reviewed in Exhibit 4? 6 A. I would say those are the two main reasons.
7 A. Yes. It has most of them. If you go to page 7 Q. Was another main reason because All In One did
8 AIO 438, Section 16, they added verbiage to my 8 not want to pay the commission to the real estate agent?
9 attorney's e-mail. My attorney didn't specify who was 9 A. No, it was not.
10 going to be paying the commission, and his attorney 10 Q. Did All In One ever tell the buyer to change
11 specified who was going to be paying the commission. So 11 the verbiage in Section 16 to state that the buyer would
12 they changed the verbiage of what my attorney had sent. 12 be paying the commission of the brokers?
13 Q. Let's stay on page AIO 438 Section 16. 13 A. No, we did not. We were not able to modify
14 A. 438. 14 anything afterwards because once we started speaking to
15 Q. It lists Manny Chamizo as the seller's broker, 15 our attorney in regards to the affidavit that we wanted
16 right? 16 to add, and he kept on going back and forth with the
17 A. Correct. Yes, I see that. 17 buyer's attorney, Louis Montello, the buyer was not in
18 Q. And it lists Elizabeth Diaz as the buyer's 18 agreeance with it and we were not finding another
19 broker, right? 19 property. So we did not go through the contract again
20 A. Yes. That top section is the same verbiage as 20 to be able to do any other modifications just because
21 the initial one. 21 time didn't permit. We decided not to sell anymore at
22 Q. It says here in Section 16, "As agreed to by 22 that time.
23 seller and brokers, upon and at the closing seller shall 23 Q. Did All In One ever tell Elizabeth Diaz that
24 pay each broker a commission of $100,000 for a total 24 it would not pay any commission to her in June 2018?
25 commission of $200,000." Do you see that? 25 A. No, we did not.
10 (Pages 34 - 37)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 38 Page 40
1 Q. Did Troy Nader ever tell Louis Montello that 1 A. I understand, but I am giving you the reason.
2 All In One would not pay the commission to the brokers? 2 Q. I will move to strike your answer as
3 A. No. We never sent additional modifications 3 nonresponsive.
4 after these modifications were sent to us with this 4 I am asking you, did anyone else, other than
5 contract that they added the language of seller shall 5 you, know that All In One did not intend to pay the
6 pay. We did not send additional modifications, as they 6 broker commission?
7 were not in agreeance with the affidavit. By advice 7 A. Yes. Our attorney did.
8 from our attorney and our CPA, we needed to have that 8 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
9 affidavit signed for us to be able to sell the property. 9 THE WITNESS: Our attorney did. Our attorney
10 As well, we needed a plan B to be able to move our 10 and Eddy Fernandez.
11 property and purchase another building. 11 BY MS. FISHFELD:
12 Q. So Troy Nader did not tell Louis Montello that 12 Q. When did All In One tell your attorney that
13 All In One would not be paying the commission? 13 All In One would not be paying the commission?
14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 14 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. Now you're
15 THE WITNESS: No, he did not. He had minimal 15 engaging into attorney-client privileges and,
16 communication after this e-mail with Louis 16 therefore, I will instruct the witness not to
17 Montello. 17 respond what she told her attorney, when she told
18 BY MS. FISHFELD: 18 her attorney anything.
19 Q. Thank you. 19 Do not disclose any information between you
20 After this version of the contract, did All In 20 and your attorney.
21 One ever tell Manny Chamizo that it would not be paying 21 BY MS. FISHFELD:
22 the commission to either broker? 22 Q. Your testimony is that your attorney knew that
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 23 All In One would not be paying the commission.
24 THE WITNESS: No. We never had those 24 A. Correct.
25 conversations with Manny Chamizo that I am aware of 25 Q. And that All In One knew it did not want to
Page 39 Page 41
1 to the best of my knowledge. 1 pay a commission.
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 A. Correct.
3 Q. Did All In One ever tell Vince Lago that it 3 Q. Did anyone else know that?
4 would not be paying the commission to either broker? 4 A. Not that I am aware of.
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
6 THE WITNESS: No. 6 THE WITNESS: Not that I am aware of.
7 BY MS. FISHFELD: 7 BY MS. FISHFELD:
8 Q. The only person who says that All In One would 8 Q. Thank you. Let's go to tab 6. This is
9 not be paying the commission is you? 9 Exhibit 6. It is AIO 72 to 74.
10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 10 A. I have it.
11 THE WITNESS: There was no commission to be 11 (Thereupon, Tab 6, AIO 72-74 was remotely
12 paid at that time because there was no contract 12 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 6 for Identification.)
13 that was executed. So I am telling you what I do 13 BY MS. FISHFELD:
14 know, which is the fact that the buyer's attorney 14 Q. Do you recognize this e-mail?
15 wrote language that our attorney did not specify in 15 A. Yes, I do.
16 the modifications. 16 Q. It is an e-mail from Eddy Fernandez to Manny
17 At that moment, after this draft that you 17 Chamizo. It says on here from Eddy Fernandez to Manny.
18 provided to us, we did not proceed with the 18 Do you understand that to be Manny Chamizo?
19 contract due to the fact that the buyer was very 19 A. Yes, I do.
20 resistant in signing the affidavit. He did not 20 Q. And the cc is Yahoo Mail. Do you understand
21 want to sign the affidavit. And without the 21 that to be Vince Lago's e-mail?
22 affidavit -- 22 A. Yes, it is.
23 BY MS. FISHFELD: 23 Q. And Elizabeth Diaz?
24 Q. My question had nothing to do with the 24 A. Mm-hmm.
25 affidavit. 25 Q. It is dated June 20, 2018, right?
11 (Pages 38 - 41)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 42 Page 44
1 A. Yes. 1 Q. Is it correct that All In One called off the
2 Q. In the e-mail, Eddy Fernandez says to Manny: 2 deal because it wasn't a good time to sell the property?
3 "After giving this contract serious consideration, we 3 A. It is correct to say that All In One did not
4 have decided not to accept the contract." 4 sign the sales contract that was presented to us because
5 Did All In One give the contract serious 5 we did not have a replacement property. The buyer did
6 consideration? 6 not agree in an affidavit which our CPA and our attorney
7 A. Yes. Of course we did. We sat with our 7 wanted us to sign with him. That is why we did not
8 attorney various times. We even had a meeting with our 8 proceed with the sales contract.
9 CPA to go over the information. Eddy looked at the 9 Q. But All In One told Manny and Vince and Liz
10 properties that were in the market by ourselves. We 10 that the timing was not right?
11 also went out -- he also went out with Manny and Vince. 11 A. Right. The timing is in reference to what I
12 Of course we did. We took consideration into this 12 mentioned. The timing was not right due to the fact
13 contract. 13 that there was not a replacement property for us. There
14 During that time frame, which was about 14 wasn't a property that we could go to.
15 probably three weeks, we had to do our due diligence to 15 The affidavit that was being signed was in
16 be able to sell the property, so we had several meetings 16 reference to the escrow that they were going to be
17 with our attorney. We had several meetings with our 17 holding from us because they wanted to extend their
18 CPA, and we also were looking for properties for us to 18 closing date. So that is why we did not proceed. We
19 be able to move because we knew that we had a short term 19 did not want to lose closing on one property and --
20 that we would be able to be tenants, if anything, at the 20 closing on a property, like purchasing the property, and
21 property. 21 not closing on this property, as this property was going
22 MS. DE ALEJO: Jessica, whenever you have a 22 to be involved as part of the 1031 exchange as well.
23 break, if we could take a bathroom break. Just 23 Q. So the timing wasn't right because you had not
24 keep that in mind. 24 yet found a replacement property to move your business
25 MS. FISHFELD: Sure. How about after this 25 into.
Page 43 Page 45
1 document? 1 A. And the buyer was not in agreeance with
2 MS. DE ALEJO: Thank you. 2 signing the affidavit. We were not able to proceed.
3 BY MS. FISHFELD: 3 Q. Tell me what the affidavit was about.
4 Q. So All In One took this potential deal 4 A. The affidavit had to deal with the fact that
5 seriously. 5 if we would purchase another property, that we wouldn't
6 A. Yes, we did. 6 be caught with two properties. We were going to be
7 Q. Did you understand that Manny took it 7 doing what is called a 1031 exchange, so we needed to be
8 seriously? 8 sure that we had replacement property for tax purposes.
9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 9 We needed to be sure that this buyer wasn't going to
10 THE WITNESS: We understood that Manny and 10 back out and we would already be in another contract and
11 Vince both took it seriously, as well as Elizabeth 11 now have this property, 3251, not closed on, still own
12 and Alex Alvarez. All parties involved, including 12 it, and purchasing a new property that we were going to
13 our attorneys. Everyone took it seriously. 13 be moving into and Alex Alvarez not close on this
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 property.
15 Q. The next line says in the e-mail says: 15 Q. So the affidavit was in relation to the need
16 "Unfortunately, the timing is not right." 16 for a replacement property, right?
17 What does he mean by that, the timing is not 17 A. Correct. There was a need for the escrow that
18 right? 18 was going to be held back if the buyer did not close.
19 A. The timing is not right because at that time 19 Q. He then says in this e-mail: "Three months
20 we were not able to find a property for us to move to 20 ago, it would've been a different story." What does
21 and having the buyer give us hesitation on signing the 21 that mean?
22 affidavit -- the timing wasn't right. We needed that 22 A. In that aspect, from my conversations with
23 affidavit. We needed to be sure that if we would get 23 Eddy, it's that there was more property in the market
24 ourselves into another property, he would not then say, 24 three months ago.
25 "Oh, I am not going to close on this property." 25 Q. So if it had been three months ago, All In One
12 (Pages 42 - 45)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 46 Page 48
1 would have felt more secure that it would easily be able 1 A. Yes. Yes.
2 to find a replacement property? 2 Q. Was that potential buyer, the not-for-profit,
3 A. Yes. 3 represented by a buyer's broker?
4 Q. But at this time, there were not a lot of 4 A. They were.
5 properties that fit your desires to be a replacement 5 Q. Was All In One represented by a broker for the
6 property. 6 listing?
7 A. Correct. Right. There were properties in the 7 A. Eddy was the listing agent.
8 market, and most of them needed a lot of work. We 8 Q. That was in October 2018?
9 didn't have the time for that. 9 A. Yes.
10 Q. Then as you see, Eddy apologizes to Manny and 10 Q. What were the terms of that offer? I guess I
11 Vince and apologizes to Elizabeth. He then says: "At 11 will have to narrow that. What was the purchase price?
12 this time, our building will not be in the market." Do 12 A. I think it was either 6.2, I believe, or 6.3.
13 you see that? 13 We can look it up and share.
14 A. Yes, I do. 14 Q. Did All In One receive any offers before
15 Q. What does that mean? 15 October 2018?
16 A. That we are not interested in any offers to 16 A. You mean between June and October of 2018?
17 sell the building. 17 Q. Yes.
18 Q. All In One was no longer interested in selling 18 A. We did receive phone calls in regards to
19 the property to anyone at that time. 19 showing the property. I cannot recall if we received --
20 A. Yes. 20 like, it wasn't an offer. It was like a letter of
21 MS. FISHFELD: I am done with this document, 21 intent. I am not exactly sure how many letters of
22 so we can take our break. 22 intent we received during that time frame. I know we
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Thank you. 23 definitely did have individuals come and look at the
24 THE WITNESS: Thank you. 24 property during that time frame.
25 (Recess taken in the proceedings from 11:15 25 Q. How did they learn about the property? Did
Page 47 Page 49
1 a.m. to 11:23 p.m., after which the following 1 they learn about the property through the listing?
2 proceedings were had:) 2 A. The property was listed and it was -- that is
3 MS. FISHFELD: Back on the record. 3 how they -- at least the one in October, that is how
4 BY MS. FISHFELD: 4 they knew about the property. In specifics, I don't
5 Q. We were just talking about, with respect to 5 know if the other ones knew because of the listing. I
6 Exhibit 6, that in the June 20, 2018, e-mail, Eddy told 6 don't know if they came in July or August or if it was
7 Manny, Vince, and Elizabeth Diaz that All In One was no 7 in September, like mid-September, once we sent out the
8 longer interested in selling the property at that time, 8 offering memorandum and the listing.
9 right? 9 Q. After June 20, 2018, you recall a formal offer
10 A. Yes. 10 being submitted by the not-for-profit in October, and
11 Q. After that e-mail, did All In One entertain 11 you are not sure about a few other offers you may have
12 any other offers through an off-market deal? 12 received before that?
13 A. We were presented an offer in October, but we 13 A. Yes. I am not sure. There was nothing that
14 had -- we listed the property. Like, Eddy listed the 14 ever came to fruition. I don't know if it was during
15 property. Then in October we were presented an offer 15 that time frame or not. I do recall that one for the
16 from -- it was like a not-for-profit company. They 16 not-for-profit because I remember having a meeting about
17 presented an offer. 17 it with our CPA. None of the letters of intent that had
18 Their terms were a little different in regards 18 ever been offered to us had been from a charitable
19 to, like, how they pay you what is considered a 19 not-for-profit. They split the way that they pay you
20 shareable contribution. After our discussions with our 20 and what is considered shareable and what is considered
21 CPA, we did not move forward with that offer. 21 in a different section for your IRS taxes. It was a
22 Q. Who was the not-for-profit? 22 little bit more in depth than a regular contract.
23 A. I would have to look it up for you and send it 23 Q. Where would you have to go to find the
24 to you. 24 information that you're lacking about the other
25 Q. Was that in connection with the listing? 25 potential offers you think you may have received before
13 (Pages 46 - 49)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 50 Page 52
1 October and after June 2018? 1 Even in the beginning when we were not in the
2 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 2 property in 2017, sometimes even our GC that we had in
3 THE WITNESS: We did not keep, like, a ledger 3 the building would open up the building because it was
4 of letters of intent that we received. So 4 under construction and they would go in. So I can't
5 throughout this process, because we have had to 5 specify for you if -- we didn't keep a log of who was
6 look for documentation for this case, is that these 6 coming in and out to see the property or a file of how
7 things have -- you know, that our memory has -- we 7 many letters of intent we received during that time.
8 see e-mails, but not necessarily do I have all the 8 Everything was always up for negotiation and nothing
9 e-mails or recollection because we -- we did not 9 ever came to fruition.
10 keep a binder for every letter of intent or every 10 We never had anything concrete. They just
11 realtor that called us that wanted us to show them 11 knew that the property was being rehabbed and we were
12 the property. We did not keep any of those logs 12 willing to sell it. That was during 2017. Then in
13 throughout 2017 or 2018. 13 December 2017 we moved into the property. We were still
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 willing to sell it if somebody was coming in with a
15 Q. It's hard to ask you questions because you 15 number that we would agree upon and the negotiations
16 don't really -- I don't have anything that I can hold on 16 would be okay for us to proceed with the contract.
17 to for this. 17 Then after we decided not to go with this
18 How many offers after June 20, 2018, did All 18 property in June, we said that we no longer were going
19 In One receive? 19 to be selling the property. For about two months, until
20 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 20 probably like the beginning of September, like after the
21 THE WITNESS: We received -- we definitely 21 summer months, Eddy and I spoke about it again. We
22 received one letter of intent and various -- after 22 said, "You know what? Let's put it on the market.
23 it was listed, various phone calls and various 23 Let's see if anybody else is willing to purchase the
24 individuals calling us in regards to coming to see 24 property." Eddy did reach out to Vince Lago that he
25 the property. You know, the visits. Like with a 25 wanted to list the property.
Page 51 Page 53
1 realtor, "Oh, I have these potential buyers. Can 1 Q. Let's focus on what we are talking about right
2 we go and visit your property?" They would go and 2 now. From June 2018 to September 2018, how many offers
3 visit the property. 3 can you identify right now as you sit here today that
4 BY MS. FISHFELD: 4 All In One received?
5 Q. When did All In One list the property? 5 A. I cannot not identify any because I do not
6 A. We listed the property in, like, mid-September 6 know the time frames.
7 2018. 7 MS. FISHFELD: I will follow up, Alex, because
8 Q. Between June 2018 and mid-September 2018, did 8 I am going to need that information.
9 you receive any offers? 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 A. I don't have a date specific, so I could not 10 Q. Let's move on from that for now. I don't know
11 give you an answer in those two months. 11 if you will want to find that information out during a
12 Q. Before mid-September, it wasn't listed 12 break or something or if you want me to move to have you
13 publicly, right? 13 come back again. That is one of the topics that you are
14 A. No. It was not listed publicly. No. 14 here to testify to today as the representative. We are
15 Q. Any offers you received -- 15 going to need that information at some point.
16 A. Throughout 2017 and 2018, we did not have the 16 A. What information do you need?
17 property listed. But there were realtors that knew we 17 MS. DE ALEJO: We will talk on a break. Any
18 would be willing to sell the property if they brought in 18 documents that they located that deal with that, we
19 a buyer. So we did have letters of intent that came in. 19 will do a supplemental production. I will try to
20 Several letters of intent that came in were not 20 get that done while we are here today. If there
21 necessarily only from Manny Chamizo or Vince Lago. 21 are no documents, there is no information for us to
22 There were other realtors that also sent us letters of 22 provide.
23 intent to be able to come and view the property. They 23 MS. FISHFELD: She can provide testimony.
24 would view the property and then send us a letter of 24 MS. DE ALEJO: Yes, she can provide
25 intent. 25 testimony. As a corporate representative, you have
14 (Pages 50 - 53)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 54 Page 56
1 to base it on the records of the company. So if 1 in 2018 before?
2 there are no corporate documents and if she has had 2 A. Because we wanted to list the property to be
3 these conversations between the members, she can't 3 able to have the listing for all realtors to be able to
4 create testimony that is not maintained within the 4 know that we were selling the property and it would be
5 company and that's not corporate knowledge. 5 able to -- once you list a property, it goes out to more
6 MS. FISHFELD: I don't think that is accurate. 6 realtors than if it's just word of mouth that a property
7 MS. DE ALEJO: That's fine. 7 is off market. There are more marketing platforms for
8 MS. FISHFELD: Her testimony is not just based 8 the property to be and it's easier and more accessible
9 on what documents exist. It is also based on her 9 for anybody to Google to see the property is being
10 experience as a representative of the company and 10 listed and find information about the property.
11 the other managing members' experiences. 11 Q. It states in Eddy's text message: "Our asking
12 MS. DE ALEJO: That is what I just said. 12 price will be $6,450,000 with 4 percent total commission
13 MS. FISHFELD: I thought you said it was based 13 for selling and listing broker."
14 only on documents that exist. 14 A. Yes. Correct.
15 MS. DE ALEJO: That's not what I said. 15 Q. Is it right that All In One increased the
16 MS. FISHFELD: Okay. 16 sales price of the property?
17 Let's go to tab 7. This will be Exhibit 7, 17 A. Yes, we increased the sales price of the
18 please. It is Lago 28 to 35. 18 property.
19 (Thereupon, Tab 7, LAGO 28-35 was remotely 19 Q. By approximately $450,000?
20 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 7 for Identification.) 20 A. By approximately -- yes.
21 BY MS. FISHFELD: 21 Q. Why did All In One raise the price by
22 Q. If you go to Lago 29, this appears to be a 22 $450,000?
23 text message. It was produced by Vince Lago. At the 23 A. To be able to provide the 4 percent total
24 top it says EF, and then it has the name Eddy. The text 24 commission for the selling and listing broker.
25 message says: "Good morning, Vince. I hope you had a 25 Q. At this point, is it right that All In One's
Page 55 Page 57
1 wonderful Labor Day weekend with your family. Adriana 1 intention was for it, as the seller, to pay the
2 and I have decided to lease 3251 Ponce de Leon." 2 commission to the selling and buyer's broker?
3 So my first question is: Is it your 3 A. Yes, it was. That is why we raised the sales
4 understanding that this is a text message from Eddy to 4 price.
5 Vince about the property? 5 Q. Why did All In One now decide that it would
6 A. Yes. 6 pay the broker commission?
7 Q. I think we talked about this at your prior 7 A. Because we thought it would be a more
8 deposition. Just to be clear, I'll ask you again. It 8 favorable offer if we would raise our sales price and
9 says: "Adriana and I have decided to lease 3251 Ponce 9 say that the seller was paying the commission for the
10 de Leon." Is it right that it was meant to say "we have 10 selling and the listing broker, and we raised it up to
11 decided to list 3231 Ponce de Leon"? 11 4 percent.
12 A. Yes. That is correct. 12 Q. A more favorable offer to whom?
13 Q. If you scroll up just to the bottom of the 13 A. Well, a more favorable offer to any realtor
14 prior page, Lago 28, you can see there that the date 14 that was showing the property and bringing a buyer for
15 this text was sent was September 4, 2018. Okay? 15 the property.
16 A. Yes. 16 Q. It says: "4 percent total commission for
17 Q. In around September 2018, All In One decided 17 selling and listing broker."
18 to list the property, right? 18 A. Mm-hmm.
19 A. Yes. 19 Q. Was that a typo again and he meant to say "for
20 Q. Why did All In One decide to list the property 20 buying and listing broker"?
21 at that time? 21 A. Yes.
22 A. Because we wanted it to be on the market to 22 Q. The offer of a 4 percent total commission is
23 see if we could have a successful sale of the property. 23 quite a bit higher than the $100,000 commission that was
24 Q. Why didn't you just continue showing the 24 previously being negotiated, right?
25 property as an off-market deal like you had been doing 25 A. Correct. That is before the sales price was
15 (Pages 54 - 57)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 58 Page 60
1 raised. 1 lower commission.
2 Q. Why is the total commission so much higher? 2 Q. Was the strategy here by raising the price and
3 A. Because we raised the sales price. 3 raising the commission to attract real estate agents?
4 Q. I thought you said you raised the sales price 4 A. No. It was to attract offers.
5 in order to effectuate the higher commission. 5 I think if we continue on to the next text
6 A. Right. We raised the sales price to be able 6 that you see once Vince responds, I think Eddy responds
7 to provide a higher commission. 7 back. He writes: "I understand. 6.19 is the bottom
8 Q. Why did you want to provide a higher 8 line. No haircuts on our sales price." He was already
9 commission? 9 taking out the 4 percent and knew what we would be
10 A. For the property to be more favorable for it 10 getting.
11 to be able to sell. If we are giving a higher 11 Q. By raising the commission being offered to
12 commission, the realtors would most likely be more 12 4 percent, that benefits who?
13 willing and wanting to show this property and be more 13 A. It benefits all. If we are able to close and
14 favorable for them to show their buyers this property 14 if there is a happy seller, a happy buyer, and two happy
15 because we were giving a higher commission instead of a 15 realtors, it would benefit all.
16 lower commission. 16 Q. In particular, raising the commission, that
17 Q. Is a 4 percent total commission a reasonable 17 benefits the real estate agent the most, right?
18 commission? 18 A. Correct. But we raised the sales price. It
19 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 19 was also benefiting us as well.
20 THE WITNESS: Commissions would always vary on 20 Q. The reason why you raised the commission was
21 transactions. At that moment, with that asking 21 so that you could attract real estate agents to do the
22 price, we thought it was a good commission for 22 work and show the property, right?
23 2 percent, 4 percent in total. 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
24 BY MS. FISHFELD: 24 THE WITNESS: No. You wouldn't show the
25 Q. If the price had been 6 million, would 25 property. It would be the listing agent. In this
Page 59 Page 61
1 4 percent still be a reasonable commission? 1 text message, Eddy went back to Vince to ask Vince
2 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 2 if he wanted to be the listing agent on the
3 THE WITNESS: That was not our asking price. 3 property. Like, if he was going to want to do the
4 Our asking price at that moment was 6.4. I can't 4 work to be the listing agent on the property. So
5 answer for you at that time if at 6 million we 5 Vince would be the listing agent, and then he would
6 would have not offered 4 percent total commission, 6 have put the property on the market and he would
7 because then our bottom line wouldn't have been 7 have had the buyer's agents bring their buyers with
8 what we wanted it to be. 8 them to the property. But the buyer's agent
9 BY MS. FISHFELD: 9 wouldn't show the property; it would be the listing
10 Q. What I am confused about is that I am hearing 10 agent. Vince would go and -- well, he or his
11 that you raised the price to 6.45 so that you could give 11 assistant. I don't know exactly how he works. He
12 a 4 percent commission. But then sometimes you say that 12 would go to the building and would show the
13 the 4 percent commission was reasonable because your 13 property to the buyers with the buyer's agent
14 asking price was 6.45. I am trying to understand -- 14 unless Vince coincidentally also had a buyer's
15 A. Right. Maybe I can clarify for you. 15 agent and he would be going in as well.
16 Q. Okay. 16 BY MS. FISHFELD:
17 A. We raised the sales price to be able to 17 Q. Why did All In One raise the price by $450,000
18 provide the 4 percent total commission. If we were 18 in September 2018?
19 making more, if the property was selling for more, we 19 A. To be able to pay the 4 percent total
20 were able to give up to 4 percent total commission 20 commission for the selling and buyer's agent.
21 because the 4 percent is from the 6.4. But that was 21 Q. Why did All In One want to be able to pay the
22 still $400,000 more than we were willing to give before. 22 4 percent commission to the buying and listing real
23 So if you would do the math, it was more of a 23 estate agent?
24 gain if we raised the sales price and gave a higher 24 A. Because we realized that it would be an easier
25 commission than if we had a lower sales price and a 25 transaction if we were the ones at that moment paying
16 (Pages 58 - 61)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 62 Page 64
1 the 4 percent. 1 Q. Would he have to do all of that work even
2 Q. Why? 2 though he had already been showing the property as an
3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 3 off-market deal?
4 THE WITNESS: That was our train of thought at 4 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
5 that moment. That is why we raised the sales 5 THE WITNESS: He showed the property not on a
6 price. 6 regular basis. He showed the property whenever he
7 BY MS. FISHFELD: 7 had somebody. Many times, he didn't even go. He
8 Q. Why would it be an easier transaction if you 8 would tell us that somebody was going to go and
9 were paying a 4 percent commission to both brokers? 9 either my front desk or assistant would walk around
10 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 10 with the buyer's agent or with the buyers or
11 THE WITNESS: Because the buyer wouldn't have 11 whatever it may be, and even with the general
12 to pay the commission of their agent or the 12 contractor in 2017.
13 seller's agent and he would already know what his 13 So it is a little bit different. When there
14 sales price is and wouldn't have to worry about the 14 is an exclusive listing agreement, there is more
15 commission because the seller was paying the 15 work. Every broker has different verbiage on their
16 commission. 16 listing agreements. It wouldn't be the same
17 BY MS. FISHFELD: 17 because he did not have this exclusive listing. It
18 Q. The next section says: "I am reaching out to 18 was not his. Now if anybody were to sell that
19 you. If you would not like to list this building, we 19 property, nobody else could have represented us or
20 will list it ourselves. I don't intend on giving out 20 provided us any letter of intent trying to
21 this listing to anybody else." 21 represent All In One Investment Property. It would
22 A. Mm-hmm. 22 have been only Vince Lago.
23 Q. Did All In One invite Vince to be All In One's 23 BY MS. FISHFELD:
24 listing agent for the property? 24 Q. So his role would have been very different
25 A. Yes. That is exactly what this text message 25 from what it was in June 2018 if he had accepted this
Page 63 Page 65
1 was for. It was to ask Vince to be our listing agent. 1 invitation?
2 Q. How would that relationship have been 2 A. Yes.
3 different from what Vince had already been doing in 3 Q. And he would have had to do a fair amount of
4 June 2018? 4 work if he had accepted this invitation?
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 A. Yes.
6 THE WITNESS: He would be our exclusive 6 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
7 listing agent. Him, Vince Lago. 7 THE WITNESS: Yes. Regular real estate work,
8 BY MS. FISHFELD: 8 yes.
9 Q. You emphasized "him" in that sentence. What 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 do you mean by that? 10 Q. If we scroll down and go to Lago 30, the top
11 A. That it's him. Like, Vince Lago. It was him, 11 Vince texts Eddy: "What is your bottom-line number?
12 the one we are reaching out to. We are reaching out to 12 Taking into consideration the 4 percent for real estate
13 Vince for him to be the exclusive listing agent. He 13 commission. I obviously will try to get you the highest
14 would have to do everything that is required of a 14 price. I just want to make sure we don't run into the
15 realtor when he is listing a property. 15 same issues we encountered in the last transaction."
16 Q. What kind of work would he have to do if he 16 What is Vince referring to here when he refers
17 had accepted All In One's invitation? 17 to "the last transaction"?
18 A. He would have had to market the property. He 18 A. That we did not close and we did not accept
19 would have taken pictures of the property. He would 19 the offer presented to us.
20 have to give us reports on the property. He would have 20 Q. When he says "the same issues," what issues
21 to meet the buyers' agents and buyers in the building. 21 was he talking about?
22 He would have to negotiate on our behalf and have our 22 A. That we did not close and we did not come to
23 best interest at heart as his clients. He would have to 23 an agreement.
24 meet with us to give us updates. He would list it on 24 Q. He says that he does not want to run into the
25 all the platforms that he has accessible as a realtor. 25 same issues we encountered in the last transaction. He
17 (Pages 62 - 65)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 66 Page 68
1 was referring to the negotiations with Alex Alvarez in 1 or a foreign national needs a property and they are
2 June 2018, right? 2 willing to spend more just for the needs they have.
3 A. Yes. That is the only transaction we had that 3 They need to move their business or they need to move
4 we had a sales contract on with them. 4 money around. So they are less likely to negotiate on
5 Q. So this invitation to be the listing agent was 5 sales price because of the need and the hurry that they
6 for a new engagement, separate from the last transaction 6 are to purchase something. So it all depends on the
7 with respect to Alex Alvarez, right? 7 motivation of the client of how much are they willing to
8 A. Yes. We did not have an engagement with him 8 pay for the property.
9 previously. This was for him to be our listing agent. 9 Q. When Vince and Manny had been presenting
10 Q. Then when you go to Lago 31, on September 5, 10 offers to you when the property was not listed, were
11 2018, Eddy texts: "Good morning, Vince. Please let me 11 they presenting offers from foreign nationals?
12 know your thoughts on the listing." 12 A. I am not sure. They didn't present offers.
13 Vince responds: "Give me 'til tomorrow." The 13 They presented letters of intent. We did not receive
14 last sentence of the text is: "I don't want to just 14 any sales contract, except this one. So I am not sure
15 take a listing; I want to sell the listing." 15 if those letters of intent that we reviewed last time,
16 Is Vince saying there he only wants to be the 16 if any of them were foreign nationals or not.
17 listing broker for the property if he believes he can 17 Q. Was it your understanding that they would be
18 sell it for the price that you are asking? 18 marketing the property to foreign nationals?
19 A. Yes. Correct. 19 A. We had no understanding with them in regards
20 Q. Go to Lago 32, please. Eddy asks on 20 to how they would market the property because we didn't
21 September 7th: "Good morning, Vince. Have you made a 21 expect them to market the property in any way as they
22 decision?" Eddy is asking Vince if he has made a 22 were not exclusively representing us. There were other
23 decision about whether to accept his offer to be the 23 realtors that were also bringing buyers to us. We never
24 listing agent, right? 24 asked them exactly what are you doing to let people know
25 A. Yes. Correct. 25 that this property is -- you know, that the seller is
Page 67 Page 69
1 Q. And Vince says, "Yes, I have spoken to my team 1 willing to sell if a good offer is made.
2 and I want to list the property, but the CMA we are 2 Q. When Eddy says "Once it's listed in the local
3 finalizing shows the listing should be more in the 6.3 3 and global markets where the money is, we should get the
4 range." 4 asking price," what does he mean by "where the money
5 Do you understand Vince was saying that he 5 is"?
6 thinks a listing price of 6.4 million was a bit too 6 A. Foreign nationals bring a lot of money into
7 high? 7 the United States, especially into Miami. A lot of
8 A. Yes. 8 times they are not as particular with sales prices and
9 Q. And then Eddy responds: "I understand, but 9 with negotiations because they either need to move their
10 once it's listed in the local and global markets where 10 money from their current countries that they are in due
11 the money is, we should get the asking price." 11 to governmental issues or they need to invest for visa
12 Was All In One considering listing the 12 reasons. So those are all different things that when
13 property in local and global markets? 13 you are dealing with foreign nationals you need to know.
14 A. Yes. 14 Q. By listing the property, was All In One
15 Q. What does that mean? 15 opening up the property to a different clientele than it
16 A. It's just the platforms that you use. There 16 had been opened up to before?
17 are different platforms. There are platforms that 17 A. Yes. The property was not on the market. The
18 realtors use that they are able to show properties to 18 property was not on the market previously. Unless there
19 foreign nationals that are not from the United States 19 was a realtor that had spoken to Eddy and knew that we
20 and that want to come and invest money in the United 20 were willing to sell the property, you wouldn't --
21 States. 21 nobody else would be able to know that we were willing
22 Q. Why would foreign nationals pay more than what 22 to sell because it was not listed. You couldn't find
23 Vince thought the property was worth? 23 that in any of the realtor platforms or on the Internet.
24 A. Well, I think it all depends what the buyer 24 You wouldn't be able to do a search and see that this
25 needs. Sometimes there are cases that either a domestic 25 property was for sale.
18 (Pages 66 - 69)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 70 Page 72
1 Once the property is listed, then the property 1 THE WITNESS: He didn't really give an
2 is available to everyone anywhere that has access to the 2 exact -- he said he thought it would be around the
3 Internet or any of these real estate platforms that show 3 6.3 range. He said that he didn't -- that he had a
4 commercial properties that are listed. 4 lot going on, I guess with work, and he didn't
5 Q. When Eddy says "We should get the asking 5 think the 6.4 was the list price that he would
6 price," what experience is he basing that observation or 6 want. It gave us more of the feeling that he had a
7 prediction on? 7 lot of other things going on and that is why he
8 A. He wrote "should." That is his assumption at 8 proceeded to not go with the listing.
9 that point that he believes he will get the asking price 9 BY MS. FISHFELD:
10 that he wants. 10 Q. Because he said he didn't want to just take
11 Q. What is that based on? 11 the listing; he wanted to sell the listing, right?
12 A. Based on research that he had done for 12 A. Correct. If you think about it, from 6.3 to
13 properties that were selling in that area. 13 6.4, it is very close, the sales price. It is $100,000
14 Q. Does he know a lot about the sales price that 14 on a $6 million deal. That is not a lot of money. It
15 properties can get? 15 wasn't a big difference from the range. He was at the
16 A. He does have good real estate knowledge. We 16 6.3 range and we were listing it at 6.4.
17 have access to the programs to be able to also see 17 Q. So Vince declined the offer to be the listing
18 properties that are for sale and properties that have 18 broker because he didn't feel like he was going to be
19 recently sold. 19 able to sell the property, right?
20 Q. Because he has been in real estate for a long 20 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
21 time, right? 21 THE WITNESS: You would have to ask Vince
22 A. Yes, he has. 22 that.
23 Q. So he is a very sophisticated real estate 23 BY MS. FISHFELD:
24 person? 24 Q. What did All In One believe was the reason why
25 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 25 Vince declined the offer?
Page 71 Page 73
1 THE WITNESS: His main work is not in regards 1 A. Because he had a lot on his plate.
2 to real estate. It was in regards to lending. But 2 Q. It's relevant that Vince had a lot on his
3 we have access to appraisers that we are able to 3 plate because to be the listing agent he would have to
4 call to get information for commercial and 4 do a lot more work on the property, right?
5 residential appraisals. We have the platforms we 5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
6 are able to see. We do have experience. That is 6 THE WITNESS: Yes.
7 what we do as a career. It's all in the real 7 BY MS. FISHFELD:
8 estate market. 8 Q. So that exchange or that text from Vince in
9 So yes, I would say that we are both 9 which he said thank you and good luck on the list that
10 knowledgeable of the real estate market in regards 10 we just discussed was on September 10, 2018, right?
11 to real estate transactions and financing 11 A. Yes, it was.
12 transactions. 12 Q. Then the next day, the day after Vince had
13 BY MS. FISHFELD: 13 declined All In One's invitation to be the listing
14 Q. If you go to Lago 33, Eddy writes: "Good 14 broker, he texted Eddy saying: "I just received a call
15 morning, Vince. Hope had you a wonderful weekend with 15 regarding another deal from Liz and they are willing to
16 your family. I know you have a lot on your plate. 16 buy the building as per their previous contract. All
17 Adriana and I are going to list on our own." 17 cash."
18 Then Vince responds: "Thank you. Good luck 18 Was Vince referring to the Alex Alvarez deal?
19 with the list and I hope you achieve your price." 19 A. Yes. That is the only contract he ever
20 So Vince declined All In One's offer to be the 20 presented, yes.
21 listing broker for the property, right? 21 Q. So even though he had declined All In One's
22 A. Yes, he did. 22 invitation to be the listing broker, he was still
23 Q. Is that because he believes All In One's price 23 involved in the deal with Alex Alvarez and Liz, right?
24 was too high and it wouldn't sell at that price? 24 A. Yes. Liz called him, and he reached out to
25 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 25 us.
19 (Pages 70 - 73)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 74 Page 76
1 Q. When Vince says "As per their previous 1 wrote. Eddy didn't specify anything of how Vince should
2 contract," he is referring to the terms of the offer 2 speak to Liz. It was just Vince who assumed and said "I
3 that Alex Alvarez and All In One had been negotiating 3 will tell them no," and Eddy wrote "Thank you." I don't
4 back in June 2018, right? 4 know how exactly Vince explained it. Eddy did not write
5 A. Right. The contract that was not accepted. 5 in his text message how he should explain it to Liz.
6 Yes. 6 Q. But Eddy understood that that Vince was going
7 Q. On the top of Lago 34, Eddy responds: "Good 7 to tell Liz that All In One was not interested in
8 afternoon, Vince. Our net number is $6.2 million. 8 negotiating any further with Alex Alvarez?
9 That's why we are listing the building. Our focus is 9 A. Correct. That is why Vince wrote I will tell
10 going to the overseas buyers." 10 them no.
11 Did All In One list the property in order to 11 Q. At this point, Vince was still communicating
12 focus on overseas buyers? 12 with the Alex Alvarez team on All In One's behalf?
13 A. Yes. 13 A. Liz reached out to him, yes, when this
14 Q. Why was that? 14 happened, and he reached out to us. Correct.
15 A. Because the foreign nationals during that time 15 Q. And then Vince communicated with Liz to
16 were bringing a lot of money into Miami. They were 16 communicate All In One's declining of the invitation,
17 taking it out of their countries. 17 right?
18 Q. Then he writes: "I know that your team knows 18 A. Yes.
19 Coral Gables like the back of their hands and they came 19 Q. On All In One's behalf.
20 in at 6.3 million." What does that mean? 20 A. That would be an assumption, Jessica, because
21 A. Because Vince had in a previous text mentioned 21 I don't know the conversations that Vince and Elizabeth
22 that the team had done their research and they were 22 did. But nothing ever went about. So I am sure that
23 coming in at 6.3 million. So our listing price was not 23 Vince must have told her no.
24 too off. 24 Q. I have to ask one more follow-up question. I
25 Q. Then Vince responds, "Okay. So I will tell 25 feel like we still are not quite there.
Page 75 Page 77
1 them no," and Eddy responds, "Thank you." 1 At this point, All In One understood that
2 So Eddy had declined to negotiate with Alex 2 Vince was communicating with Liz Diaz on All In One's
3 Alvarez and his real estate agent, Liz Diaz, at this 3 behalf about the potential sale of the property, right?
4 time, right? 4 A. Yes.
5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 5 Q. Why did Vince continue to communicate with Liz
6 THE WITNESS: Yes. What he said no to was 6 regarding the Alex Alvarez potential deal after he had
7 because they wanted to know -- they wanted to know 7 declined to be the listing broker for All In One?
8 if we would be going -- you know, if we were 8 A. I am not --
9 willing to sell with the previous contract. Eddy 9 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
10 said no, that we were not. 10 THE WITNESS: I am not able to answer that
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 question. I'm not Vince Lago.
12 Q. The previous contract was for 6 million, 12 BY MS. FISHFELD:
13 right? 13 Q. Why did All In One want Vince to communicate
14 A. Yes. The contract that we reviewed earlier 14 with Liz, even though Vince had already declined his
15 that was not executed. Yes, that one. 15 offer to be the listing broker?
16 Q. Now Eddy was saying that they have raised the 16 A. We did not want to -- we did not ask Vince to
17 price and the net number is now 6.2 million. So that is 17 communicate with Liz. It was Liz who approached Vince
18 why he is not interested in accepting an offer from Alex 18 in regards to this. Then Vince just relayed the message
19 Alvarez at the previous term. 19 to us where Eddy replied back to him the text message in
20 A. Yes. At that moment that is what he said, 20 regards to not being 6.2 and he was going -- that he
21 yes. 21 thought he would be getting that price.
22 Q. Eddy directed Vince to tell Liz that All In 22 Q. Vince says "I will tell them no." When Vince
23 One was not interested in continuing negotiations with 23 says "I will tell them," is he referring to Liz Diaz?
24 them at that time, right? 24 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
25 A. Well, Eddy didn't -- we could read what Eddy 25 THE WITNESS: Yes, he is referring to Liz
20 (Pages 74 - 77)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 78 Page 80
1 Diaz. 1 previous negotiation.
2 BY MS. FISHFELD: 2 A. Correct. In the previous transaction. Yes.
3 Q. And Eddy says "Thank you," right? 3 Q. Okay.
4 A. Ah-hah. 4 A. That was her point of contact.
5 Q. So Eddy is aware and accepting of the fact 5 Q. And Vince was Eddy's point of contact with Liz
6 that Vince is communicating with Liz Diaz about the sale 6 too, right?
7 of the property, right? 7 A. Yes.
8 A. Correct. But we didn't ask him to do so. He 8 Q. Then you go to Lago 35, and Eddy sent a link
9 did not follow up with Liz. Liz called him. As a 9 to an offering memorandum and an accompanying text to
10 professional, I am sure Vince received the phone call 10 Vince that says: "Good evening, Vince. We listed our
11 and contacted the seller, and the seller told him no and 11 building today. Here is the offering memorandums." Do
12 he just called her back and said no instead of leaving 12 you see that?
13 her hanging. 13 A. Yes, I do.
14 Q. So why did Vince communicate with Liz on All 14 Q. If you scroll up to the bottom of Lago 34, you
15 In One's behalf? 15 can see that the text was sent on September 27, 2018,
16 A. Because he was asked a question from Liz. Liz 16 right?
17 asked him the question. I am not sure what you are 17 A. Yes.
18 trying to get to. If someone asks you a question and 18 Q. Which is my birthday. Just saying.
19 you are going to -- you will get them an answer. So Liz 19 Then Vince writes back: "Great news. Good
20 called him and asked him a question. He asked Eddy the 20 luck." So Vince and All In One still had a cordial good
21 question. Eddy said no. Then he replied back no. 21 relationship, even though Vince had declined to be All
22 Q. If Liz called me and asked me a question about 22 In One's listing broker, right?
23 your property, I would not communicate on your behalf. 23 A. Yes.
24 A. I understand that, but Vince was involved in 24 Q. Let's go to tab 8. In will be Exhibit 8,
25 the previous transaction. That is why she called him. 25 please. It is AIO 201 to 204.
Page 79 Page 81
1 Liz would have no knowledge that Vince denied wanting to 1 A. Okay.
2 list the property. It wouldn't be public knowledge to 2 (Thereupon, Tab 8, AIO 201-204 was remotely
3 Liz that he denied listing the property. And she knows 3 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 8 for Identification.)
4 that he -- she dealt with Vince during the negotiations 4 BY MS. FISHFELD:
5 more than with Manny Chamizo. So that is who she felt 5 Q. Have you seen this e-mail thread before?
6 more comfortable with calling to ask that question. 6 A. Yes, I have.
7 Q. So I understand that. I am talking about 7 Q. It is an e-mail thread involving Eddy
8 Vince responding back to Liz. Vince says, "I will tell 8 Fernandez, Vince Lago, and Liz Diaz, right?
9 them no," and Eddy says "Thank you." 9 A. Yes, it is.
10 Eddy did not say, "No, don't communicate with 10 Q. And the e-mail thread is dated September 19,
11 Liz on my behalf," right? He did not say that in this 11 2018?
12 text message. 12 A. Yes.
13 A. No, he did not say that. 13 Q. So if you go to AIO 203, there is an e-mail
14 Q. So he was comfortable with Vince continuing to 14 from Liz Diaz to Eddy Fernandez, dated September 19,
15 be involved in a potential negotiation with Liz Diaz, 15 2018, like we just said.
16 even though Vince had declined his invitation to be the 16 A. Yes. I see it.
17 listing broker, right? 17 Q. Liz e-mails Eddy, and the second sentence
18 A. Yes. He was fine with him responding back to 18 says: "Last week I spoke with Vince Lago to see if we
19 Elizabeth, yes. 19 can get together and discuss the possibility of you
20 Q. Because Vince was still involved in the 20 selling your building. He indicated that you were
21 potential transaction with Liz Diaz and Alex Alvarez, 21 considering listing the property on the market this
22 right? 22 time, but that you wanted $6.4 million instead of the
23 A. At that moment, there was no transaction. Liz 23 original asking price of $6 million."
24 was trying to revive it to see. 24 A. Mm-hmm.
25 Q. Right. Because he had been involved in the 25 Q. She goes on to say: "One of the most
21 (Pages 78 - 81)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 82 Page 84
1 important things in a real estate transaction is having 1 right?
2 a willing seller and a willing and able buyer. In this 2 A. Yes.
3 case, we have both." 3 Q. And Vince then encourages Eddy to try to
4 Later on in the e-mail, in a new paragraph, 4 consider picking negotiations back up with Alvarez,
5 she says: "Eddy, you have a contract in hand that we 5 right?
6 have both spent time and money preparing. Why not 6 A. Yes.
7 consider this instead of starting the process all over 7 Q. Because he feels the market is going the other
8 again." 8 way. I should say he feels the market is heading in the
9 So Liz was reaching out to All In One to pick 9 other direction.
10 negotiations back up between All In One and Alvarez 10 A. Mm-hmm.
11 right? 11 Q. What does that mean? Do you know?
12 A. Correct. 12 A. Yes. He means that -- he feels the market is
13 Q. And she was saying that it would be easier to 13 not going to be -- the prices are going to lower.
14 just pick back up with those negotiations rather than 14 Q. So he felt that All In One's best bet was to
15 start all over again with the listing, right? 15 take the deal with Alvarez?
16 A. Yes. 16 A. Right. If we would wait longer, we would make
17 Q. Because you, All In One, Alvarez, and your 17 less.
18 agent, had made a lot of progress back in June and it 18 Q. Is it right that in September 2018 Vince was
19 would save you a lot of time and effort to try to close 19 trying to encourage All In One to negotiate with Alvarez
20 that gap instead of starting all over again by listing 20 instead of continuing to try to sell the property
21 the property, right? 21 through the listing?
22 A. Yes. 22 A. Yes. To Alex Alvarez, yes, he did.
23 Q. So is it right that by listing the property 23 Q. At this time, in September 2018, did Eddy
24 and marketing it to foreign nationals you would be 24 speak to Liz Diaz about a potential sale to Alex
25 starting the process all over again? 25 Alvarez? I will rephrase that. That was confusing.
Page 83 Page 85
1 A. Yes, you can say that. 1 Obviously, they did speak about it right here in this
2 Q. The next e-mail in the thread is on AIO 202. 2 e-mail.
3 Eddy forwards Liz's e-mail to Vince on the same day and 3 Did they speak again? Did they have any type
4 says: "Good afternoon, sir. Please review the e-mail 4 of phone call at that point?
5 below. My opinion, this was not a proper e-mail to send 5 A. No, no. Nothing came about. Eddy understood
6 us and I just wanted you to know." 6 Vince. He understood what he was saying, but he already
7 Why was this not a proper e-mail for Liz to 7 made up his mind that he was listing the property for a
8 send? 8 higher price, and we didn't speak to them again in
9 A. Because if she knew that Vince was 9 regards to this.
10 representing us, that he should have been involved. 10 Q. At this point, September 2018, All In One was
11 Later we found out, because of the deposition, that he 11 not interested in continuing negotiations with Alex
12 knew all along because he admitted he had been cc'd on 12 Alvarez.
13 the e-mail. So he did know she was sending the e-mail. 13 A. Correct. Because it was not the sales price
14 He was forwarding the e-mail just letting Vince know 14 that we wanted at that time. Yes. We had just listed
15 that she had sent us this e-mail because he had just 15 the property. Better said, we had not even listed the
16 spoken to him the week before. Eddy had just spoken to 16 property yet at that time. We were contemplating
17 Vince the week before. 17 listing the property and we were gathering all the
18 Q. Because Vince was representing All In One with 18 information to list the property. I believe we listed
19 respect to the Alex Alvarez transaction, it was improper 19 the property the week after.
20 for her to contact Eddy directly because she should have 20 Q. Let's go to tab 9. This will be Exhibit 9.
21 gone through Vince? 21 This is Diaz 137 to 143.
22 A. Correct. 22 A. I have it.
23 Q. Vince responds to Eddy saying that he spoke 23 (Thereupon, Tab 9, DIAZ 137-143 was remotely
24 with Liz and she asked if it was okay to contact him, 24 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 9 for Identification.)
25 All In One, directly, and Vince gave her permission, 25 BY MS. FISHFELD:
22 (Pages 82 - 85)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 86 Page 88
1 Q. Let's go to DIAZ 138. 1 to school with the kids and you knew that they liked it.
2 A. Okay. 2 They brought his daughter that is a decorator. She had
3 Q. This is an e-mail from Eddy Fernandez to Liz 3 all these plans for the building. His son works in the
4 Diaz, right? 4 company, and they were excited about it and they were
5 A. Yes. 5 looking at the information. They liked the way our I.T.
6 Q. It's dated October 8, 2018. 6 room was set up. I think they fell in love with the
7 A. Mm-hmm. 7 building. We knew that they were very interested in
8 Q. That was a "yes," right? 8 purchasing that building just with conversations that I
9 A. Yes. I'm sorry. Yes. 9 personally had with them. So we knew that they were
10 Q. That's okay. It's just for the record. 10 buyers that did want that building. That's why Eddy
11 Eddy says to Liz: "I've received multiple 11 reached out.
12 offers with financing conditions last week and will 12 Q. Did Eddy think that it would be easier to just
13 continue to do so this week." 13 try to close the gap with Alvarez rather than deal with
14 Was one of the offers that he is referring to 14 these other offers that had financing conditions?
15 the offer from the nonprofit organization? 15 A. Right. Yes. That is why he went back to her
16 A. Yes. October 2018. I can get you the exact 16 and he asked her that, and then she responded I think
17 dates in a break. I can probably look at my e-mail and 17 the same day. He wrote to her like at 11:15. She
18 find it for you. 18 responded that night that Alex wasn't prepared to
19 Q. When he says they have "financing conditions," 19 reconsider the offer. So we just dropped it at that.
20 what is he referring to? 20 We never spoke to Vince about it or anything because she
21 A. That they have financing terms. It is not an 21 told us that he wasn't interested.
22 all-cash deal. They are not all cash offers. They are 22 Q. The financing conditions of the other offers,
23 putting down whatever, maybe 30 percent down, and they 23 was that the reason why Eddy felt like it would be in
24 need to get financing. They have financing terms in 24 All In One's interest to reach back out to Alvarez?
25 regards to like how many days for their due diligence 25 A. Yes.
Page 87 Page 89
1 for their loan commitment from the lender, what is going 1 Q. When Eddy said to Liz, "Your buyer's offer was
2 to be part of the contract, how many days they need to 2 interesting for the terms," is that a reference to the
3 be able to close. They had financing contingencies, 3 fact that Alvarez's offer was an all-cash offer?
4 like, they would be able to get out if they were not 4 A. Correct.
5 able to get financing for the property. 5 Q. Then the next sentence says: "But fell short
6 Q. Are financing conditions unattractive to All 6 of our asking price." What does he mean by that?
7 In One? 7 A. It fell short of what he wanted to make on the
8 A. A cash offer is always easier because you 8 property. Like, what he would close the sales price
9 don't have to worry about the buyer being approved and 9 for.
10 the terms of the buyer's lender being approved and the 10 Q. Hadn't Alvarez come in at the asking price
11 time frames. Sometimes it is not necessarily that the 11 back in June 2018?
12 buyer isn't approved; it's how long it takes for them to 12 A. Alvarez came in at 6 million, I think it was,
13 get to the closing table for X, Y, or Z reason. So a 13 back in June 2018.
14 cash offer is always going to be more attractive to us 14 Q. Wasn't that the asking price in June 2018?
15 than one with financing. 15 A. I would have to check. Everything was always
16 Q. Let's go to the next paragraph. "I wanted to 16 up for negotiation, so it depended on commissions and
17 reach out to you one more time. Your buyer's offer was 17 all that exactly what the asking price was going to be.
18 interesting for the terms, but fell short of our asking 18 Q. Let's go to the next paragraph. "As I
19 price." 19 mentioned, our net $6,200,000. I understand your
20 Why did All In One want to reach out to Liz 20 buyer's offer comes with no financing conditions. If
21 Diaz in October 2018? 21 your buyer is willing to bring his offer up to a net of
22 A. Because we knew that Alex Alvarez really liked 22 $6,050,000, with the same terms as before, we will
23 the building. Not only did we know that he liked the 23 accept it." Do you see that?
24 building -- we knew he liked the building because I know 24 A. Yes.
25 his family and they had gone to the building and I went 25 Q. At this point, he is saying that he will
23 (Pages 86 - 89)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 90 Page 92
1 accept the terms that had been offered in June 2018, 1 buyer was going to pay. That is why we didn't accept
2 except the price would have to go up, right? 2 the contract. Because it said the seller. The seller.
3 A. Correct. 3 They had changed it to the seller. With that sales
4 Q. It was only a matter of agreeing on the price 4 price, we were for the buyer to pay. Our attorney did
5 at this point, right? 5 not specify it in the corrections, but that was the
6 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 6 conversations that we had with our attorney. The buyer
7 THE WITNESS: Right. If her buyer was willing 7 would pay the commissions, not the seller.
8 to agree on the price that he had put. 8 Q. Okay.
9 BY MS. FISHFELD: 9 A. In most of Eddy's e-mail you will see net,
10 Q. And the exact same terms as before, it says, 10 net, net. What he means by net is what he is getting.
11 right? 11 The net.
12 A. Right. But that is why the sales price was 12 Q. Let's take a step back.
13 moved up to 6.2. 13 A. Okay.
14 Q. What do you mean by that? 14 Q. This e-mail says, "If your buyer is willing to
15 A. Because in the initial contract -- remember 15 bring his offer up to a net of $6,050,000 with the same
16 that the draft contract that we reviewed earlier today 16 terms as before, we will accept it." And I am saying
17 was at 6 million and their buyer's attorney had put that 17 "we will accept it" because there is a tiny typo right
18 the seller had to pay the commission. So if we were 18 there, right?
19 going to have to pay the commission and it no longer was 19 A. Right. Right. Mm-hmm.
20 going to be the buyer paying the commission, that is why 20 Q. When he says "with the same terms as before,"
21 the sales price went up to 6.2. That is why he writes 21 he is referring to the June 14, 2018, marked-up draft
22 net. That he would net himself 6 million. 22 contract that we reviewed together.
23 Q. So Eddy is saying if Alvarez brings his price 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
24 up to $6,050,000 -- 24 BY MS. FISHFELD:
25 A. No. What he is saying is -- okay. "As I 25 Q. That was Exhibit 5.
Page 91 Page 93
1 mentioned, our net $6,200,000. I understand your 1 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
2 buyer's offer comes with no financing conditions. If 2 THE WITNESS: I understand what you are
3 your buyer is willing to bring his offer up to a net of 3 referring to, which is that sales contract. But in
4 $6,050,000, with the same terms as before, we will 4 that sales contract, we didn't accept that it said
5 accept it." That the buyer would pay. 5 the seller was paying the commission. So it was
6 Q. He is saying the seller will pay $200,000 in 6 for the buyer to pay the commission. So those are
7 commission. 7 the terms that Eddy had. The buyer would pay the
8 A. If you keep it at the 6.2. But if it's the 8 commission for the 6 million. If it was at 6.2,
9 other one, then the buyer has to pay. 9 then we would pay the commission. That is what he
10 Q. So at this point, October 2018, All In One was 10 is putting on there.
11 offering to Alvarez to accept the contract with the same 11 BY MS. FISHFELD:
12 terms as had been discussed in June 2018, except 12 Q. When he says "With the same terms as before,"
13 increasing the purchase price, right? 13 what is he referring to?
14 A. Mm-hmm. 14 A. Well, the rest of the terms on the contract.
15 Q. Is that a yes? 15 When he refers to the terms, it is the fact that it was
16 A. No. What he was saying was that the buyer is 16 a cash offer. It did not have a financing contingency.
17 willing to bring his offer to a net of 6.5. So what he 17 Q. When Eddy says, "With the same terms as
18 means by net of 6.5, it is either you put a sales price 18 before," is he referring to the terms that were offered
19 of 6.2 and I pay the seller -- the listing and buyer's 19 in Exhibit 5?
20 agent commission, or you keep it at 6 and the buyer pays 20 A. He is referring to --
21 the selling and listing commission. 21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
22 Q. But here, he is saying if you keep the same 22 THE WITNESS: He is referring to -- just like
23 terms as before. When he says "the same terms as 23 he did on the top. If you read the top, he is
24 before," he is referring to the -- 24 saying the terms were interesting because it did
25 A. Right. Because those terms were that the 25 not have -- this e-mail is based on the offers that
24 (Pages 90 - 93)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 94 Page 96
1 he is getting have financing contingencies, which 1 as a cash deal than a commercial property that
2 he named as conditions. Alex Alvarez's did not. 2 needed to get financing. Financing for commercial
3 It was a cash offer. So the terms of how it was 3 properties takes time and there is a lot of due
4 going to be paid was different. So that is what he 4 diligence as well. Not everybody is approved.
5 is saying. That he would accept that if it was 5 BY MS. FISHFELD:
6 cash instead of it being financed. That is why he 6 Q. If Elizabeth had written back saying, "Yes,
7 is reaching out to her. These other contracts have 7 okay," would All In One have paid the seller's and
8 financing contingencies and Alex Alvarez's was a 8 buyer's broker commission?
9 cash deal. 9 A. If Elizabeth would have said yes, we would
10 You see, that is why it says "I wanted to 10 have to see how she was going to come in. We wrote that
11 reach out to you one more time. Your buyer's offer 11 it had fallen short of the terms. So it all depends how
12 was interesting for the terms," because it was 12 she was going to come in. If she was going to give us a
13 cash, "but fell short of our asking price." 13 contract that said this is our net. You have to
14 BY MS. FISHFELD: 14 understand net means after we have paid any commissions.
15 Q. Yes, I see that. I see he says "With the same 15 So if she wanted us to pay the commission, she was going
16 terms as before." I am trying to understand what he is 16 to have to put it on top of the 6 million.
17 referring to there. 17 That is why Eddy clearly says offer up to a
18 A. And I am telling you what it is. It is the 18 net of 6 million. So the 6 million is not that we were
19 terms. His e-mail to her is saying I have received 19 going to be paying the -- that we were going to be
20 multiple offers with financing conditions. So then he 20 paying the agent's commissions. That is the net. That
21 is saying that your buyer's offer was interesting for 21 is what we wanted to net from this transaction. Now, if
22 the terms. The fact that it did not have any financing 22 we were the ones that were going to be paying the
23 conditions and it was a cash deal. 23 commissions, then the sales price had to be higher to
24 Q. Let's stop there. When he says "Your buyer's 24 compensate for those commissions. That is why he writes
25 offer was interesting for the terms," is he referring to 25 there "net." He is very clear on that. He writes that
Page 95 Page 97
1 the draft contract that the parties were negotiating in 1 he wants to net that amount.
2 June 2018? 2 Q. Correct. So in this e-mail, he says "With the
3 A. Yes. Correct. That contract was a cash deal. 3 same terms as before." The terms before had the seller
4 Q. When he says "With the same terms as before," 4 paying for the commissions, right?
5 is he referring to the draft contract the parties were 5 A. So if we were --
6 negotiating in 2018? 6 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
7 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 7 THE WITNESS: Okay. If we were the ones that
8 THE WITNESS: Yes. Because he is talking that 8 would be paying the commission, then she would have
9 it is a cash deal and not -- it did not have any 9 to offer us a contract with a higher sales price
10 financing contingencies. 10 because we wanted to net the 6-million-50. She
11 BY MS. FISHFELD: 11 would have to give us a contract -- if she was
12 Q. Why did All In One decide to go back down to a 12 going to call Vince and they were going to say
13 net of 6.2 instead of continuing with the listing and 13 whatever it is that they were going to put,
14 marketing it to foreign nationals? 14 whatever it was, she was going to have to up it on
15 A. Well, the listing was for 6.4. Out of the 15 the sales price for us to be able to pay it. If
16 6.4, you have to deduct the commissions that you would 16 not, then she was going to have to have the buyer
17 pay. So the net would be -- it wouldn't be 6.4. It's 17 pay both commissions. But that's why he clearly
18 not the gross; it's the net. 18 writes there that he wanted to net 6 million with
19 Q. Why did All In One want to go back to the 19 the same terms as before. He did not put there
20 Alvarez deal instead of pursuing any offers it was 20 that was the sales price. He wrote there that he
21 receiving from the listing? 21 wanted to net. It is a big difference, net and
22 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 22 sales price. It is two differences.
23 THE WITNESS: Because the offers that we 23 BY MS. FISHFELD:
24 received had financing conditions, and her offer 24 Q. So this says, "If your buyer is willing to
25 was a cash deal. We knew that it would go smoother 25 bring his offer up to a net of $6,050,000 with the same
25 (Pages 94 - 97)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 98 Page 100
1 terms as before, we will accept it." 1 thanked her minutes later, and that was it.
2 A. Correct. 2 Q. Did All In One let Vince know about this
3 Q. So if you take the same terms as before, those 3 interaction?
4 include that the seller would be the one paying the 4 A. No. In this instance, we did not. We did in
5 commission, right? 5 the one in September. This one we did not because she
6 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 6 responded right away saying no, so there was nothing to
7 THE WITNESS: The last drafted contract had 7 talk about with Vince. Why waste his time since she
8 that the seller would pay it. 8 already said no.
9 BY MS. FISHFELD: 9 Q. When you scroll up to Diaz 137, I know you are
10 Q. Thank you. 10 not on this e-mail, but you can see that Liz did forward
11 According to Eddy's e-mail here, the options 11 that interaction to Vince. Do you see that?
12 were to either keep the same terms as before with the 12 A. Yes. That is totally okay. Yes.
13 seller paying the broker fees and increase the sales 13 Q. That was my question. Does that surprise you?
14 price so that All In One nets $6,050,000, that is one 14 A. No. Not at all. That's fine.
15 option, right? 15 Q. So Liz was looping Vince in because he is
16 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 16 still involved in this transaction at this point, right?
17 THE WITNESS: Yes. Eddy wanted to net 17 A. Because he is the one that -- not because he
18 6-million-50. Commissions had to be on top of 18 is involved in the transaction, but because he is the
19 that. 19 one that -- in the previous sales contract, he is the
20 BY MS. FISHFELD: 20 one that was part of it and that is who she communicated
21 Q. So yes, that was one option, what I just said? 21 with from that sales contract. She was just letting the
22 A. Yes. Yes. 22 realtor know, which is completely professional and
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 23 completely correct.
24 THE WITNESS: I said yes. 24 It's just like Eddy had let her know in
25 BY MS. FISHFELD: 25 September that -- let Vince know in September she had
Page 99 Page 101
1 Q. And another option is that All In One would 1 reached out to him. If she would have responded
2 not pay any broker fees and the purchase price could be 2 anything else, we would have reached out to Vince. She
3 for $6,050,000 flat. That is the second option? 3 responded and said he was not prepared to reconsider the
4 A. Yes. No matter what, our net was $6 million. 4 offer, and that is why we did not forward it over to
5 However they negotiated it and however they presented 5 Vince.
6 it, that was up to them. 6 Q. With respect to this transaction with Alvarez,
7 Q. So these were the two options, right? 7 Vince was the --
8 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 8 A. The point of contact.
9 THE WITNESS: Yes. 9 Q. He was the point of contact. He was working
10 MS. DE ALEJO: What is our plan for lunch? 10 with Manny as the seller's broker with respect to the
11 MS. FISHFELD: Can I finish my train of 11 Alvarez potential deal, right?
12 thought on this document and then we will take a 12 A. Correct. We were only communicating with
13 break? 13 Vince at this point. Yes.
14 MS. DE ALEJO: Yes. No problem. 14 MS. FISHFELD: I am done with this document.
15 BY MS. FISHFELD: 15 MS. DE ALEJO: I am starving. I need to eat.
16 Q. We already kind of talked about the next 16 MS. FISHFELD: We can go off the record.
17 e-mail up. Liz wrote back to Eddy, and she said that 17 (Discussion off the record.)
18 "Alex, at this time, is not prepared to reconsider an 18 (Luncheon recess taken in the proceedings from
19 offer," right? 19 12:58 p.m. to 1:47 p.m., after which the following
20 A. Yes. 20 proceedings were had:)
21 Q. In October 2018, did Eddy and Liz have any 21 MS. FISHFELD: We are back on the record.
22 further discussions about a potential sale of the 22 BY MS. FISHFELD:
23 property to Alvarez? 23 Q. Let's look at tab 10. This will be
24 A. No. No. She responded back that same night 24 Exhibit 10. It is Lago 35 to 36.
25 and said that Alex was not interested. Eddy just 25 A. I have it.
26 (Pages 98 - 101)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 102 Page 104
1 (Thereupon, Tab 10, LAGO 35-36 was remotely 1 good morning. I just got a call from Liz. Would you
2 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 10 for 2 have a moment to talk today?" Do you see that?
3 Identification.) 3 A. Yes.
4 BY MS. FISHFELD: 4 Q. Eddy responds that he is in a meeting, but he
5 Q. This appears to be a text message thread, 5 can call Vince at 11:15 a.m., right?
6 right? 6 A. Yes.
7 A. Yes. 7 Q. Did Eddy in fact call Vince that day,
8 Q. On the top it says EF and the name Eddy, 8 March 13, 2019?
9 right? 9 A. Yes, he did. They spoke.
10 A. Yes. That is Eddy Fernandez. 10 Q. What was discussed?
11 Q. So this appears to be a text message thread 11 A. Vince had said that he had spoken to Liz and
12 between Eddy and Vince? 12 that Liz was interested again in the Alex Alvarez. And
13 A. Yes. 13 Eddy said that he would need to see the offer. Vince
14 Q. On the top of Lago 36, there is a text message 14 advised him that he didn't want to be any part of it,
15 from Vince to Eddy that says: "I hope all is well. I 15 just like he advised him back in June when they had last
16 have a friend looking to rent space. Do you have any 16 spoken in June of 2018 when they had breakfast. He told
17 availability?" Do you see that? 17 him he didn't want to be part of the transaction. It
18 A. Yes, I do. 18 was the same thing; that he didn't want to be involved
19 Q. And if you look at the bottom of the prior 19 in the transaction with us.
20 page, Lago 35, you can see that this text message was 20 Q. When you say "the transaction," what
21 sent on December 4, 2018, right? 21 transaction are you referring to?
22 A. Yes. 22 A. The one with Liz and Alex.
23 Q. Eddy responded to Vince's text with some 23 Q. You mentioned when they had coffee in
24 pleasantries and then saying, "We are not renting any 24 June 2018. Are you saying that Vince told Eddy in
25 suites at this time. Thank you. Have a wonderful 25 June 2018 that he didn't want to be involved in any
Page 103 Page 105
1 holiday season and Merry Christmas," right? 1 transaction with Liz and Alex?
2 A. Mm-hmm. Yes. 2 A. Yes. Yes, he did. He didn't want to be in
3 Q. And Vince responds, "Great to hear. How is 3 any transaction because that was -- in June, the last
4 the sale going? We should catch up for a coffee during 4 week of June, that was when Vince and Eddy had breakfast
5 the holiday season." 5 at the Bagel Emporium because they went to go speak
6 Eddy responds: "Definitely. Let me know how 6 about the text messages, the unprofessional text
7 your mornings are next week." Do you see that? 7 messages that Manny Chamizo sent over to Eddy. Vince
8 A. Yes, I do. 8 was on the thread, and Vince wanted to apologize to Eddy
9 Q. And on Christmas Eve, Eddy texted Vince and 9 in regards to Manny Chamizo. You know, not to associate
10 said: "Good morning, Vince. Hope you have a blessed 10 him with -- what Manny does is not what Vince would do
11 and Merry Christmas with your loved ones," right? 11 and he did not want to be part of the whole transaction
12 A. Yes. 12 that was going on and he wanted to step out. He did not
13 Q. Even though Vince had declined to be All In 13 want to be part of that.
14 One's listing broker, Eddy and Vince still had a very 14 Q. Okay. So then why was Vince still involved in
15 good and friendly relationship, right? 15 the transaction after June 2018?
16 A. Yes. 16 A. Every time that Liz came to us, we went to
17 (Thereupon, Tab 11, LAGO 37 was remotely 17 Vince and we advised him about what was happening. It
18 introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 for 18 was the right thing to do. It was right to, you know,
19 Identification.) 19 acknowledge to Vince that Liz reached out to us in
20 BY MS. FISHFELD: 20 September. So we advised him about it in October. We
21 Q. Let's go to tab 11. This is Lago 37. 21 didn't advise him because she said no.
22 Is this a text message between Eddy Fernandez 22 Then now in March, he contacted us. When he
23 and Vince Lago? 23 speaks with us, he does not want to be part of this
24 A. Yes, it is. 24 transaction and he never after that reached out to us
25 Q. On March 13, 2019, Vince texted Eddy. "Sir, 25 again. After that text message, he never reached out to
10 (Pages 34 - 37)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 38 Page 40
1 Q. And you earned a commission of 1 there's a lot of numbers that go in your head.
2 approximately $60,000 in that deal, right? 2 So the only way you can give straight answers is
3 A. I'm not sure how much was the amount, 3 by having documents in front of you.
4 but I -- I believe I earned a commission. 4 Q. So the answer to my question is you do
5 Q. You purchased the property at 6780 5 not know, right?
6 Southwest 90th Street for $3 million, right? 6 A. At this point without the documents, I
7 A. I don't have that number in front of 7 cannot give you an answer.
8 me. 8 Q. I -- I -- I -- you're saying I can't
9 Q. You purchased the property at 4270 9 give you an answer. And I don't have the
10 Minton Road for $4 million, right? 10 information in front of you. And I want to know
11 A. I don't have that information in front 11 do you know the answer?
12 of me. 12 A. I would know the answer if I had the
13 Q. And so -- so I know you don't have the 13 documents in front of me, the correct answer,
14 information in front of you, but do you not -- 14 the exact answer, if I had the documents in
15 you don't know how much you purchased that 15 front of me. I am the one negotiating these
16 property for? 16 deals when I negotiate them. But I don't have
17 A. At this point I don't have that 17 the documents in front of me.
18 information in front of me. And I don't want to 18 Q. But you don't know at this point
19 give you a wrong answer. 19 whether you purchased the property for
20 Q. Okay. So you do not know how much you 20 $3 million; yes, no, or you don't know?
21 purchased that property for? 21 A. I know we purchased that property. I
22 A. If I check my documents I would know, 22 don't know the exact number of that property.
23 but I don't have the exact information in front 23 Q. Do you know an approximate number?
24 of me. 24 A. Anywhere from 1 million to 5 million.
25 Q. Okay. 25 Q. Okay. And how about for 4270 Minton
Page 39 Page 41
1 MS. DE ALEJO: Jessica, when you get a 1 Road, do you have -- do you know an approximate
2 break, I need to use the ladies' room. I 2 number that -- that you purchased that property
3 apologize. Whenever you get a second. 3 for?
4 Q. Okay. If I -- if I represented to you 4 A. That properties was listed as I
5 that you purchased the property at 6780 5 believe at 5.1 million, and it was negotiated
6 Southwest 90th Street for approximately 6 down after multiple credits that are negotiated
7 $3 million based on my information, would that 7 with the listing agent, that the seller would
8 sound right to you or you have no idea? 8 give us for air conditioning, $100,000 and for
9 MS. DE ALEJO: Can you show him the 9 reduction of price. So that property may have
10 information you're referring to maybe? 10 closed for, again, I don't have the exact
11 A. Yes. Please. 11 numbers in front of me, for about $4,800 --
12 Q. No. I'm -- I'm trying to understand 12 900,000.
13 his knowledge and -- and information. 13 Q. Okay. Just a couple more questions
14 A. My knowledge is based on documents. 14 and then we'll take a break.
15 It's not based on, what I -- in front of me 15 A. Sure.
16 right now, I don't have those documents to be 16 Q. All In One used to own a property at
17 able to give you an exact answer, a correct 17 3251 Ponce de Leon, right?
18 answer. 18 A. Correct.
19 Q. Right. So -- so does $3 million sound 19 Q. How much -- for how much did All In
20 correct to you? 20 One Investment Properties LLC purchase that
21 A. When you are -- now, I guess you don't 21 building for?
22 want to hear this. But when you are a 22 A. I know that property was listed for a
23 commercial or a residential agent, you negotiate 23 long time, and I saw it multiple times. And I
24 a lot of deals. So most of them, commercial 24 kept on reducing price. And, I met with Vince
25 don't close and some of them get started. And 25 at that property. And if I'm not mistaken that
11 (Pages 38 - 41)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 42 Page 44
1 property -- again, the exact numbers I don't 1 Q. Eddie, so the -- the closing
2 have them in front of me -- could have closed 2 statement, are they electronic or hard copy?
3 for about 3.8 million. 3 A. Well, we have hard copies, but they're
4 Q. And All In One Investment Properties 4 also electronic.
5 LLC later sold that property for how much? 5 Q. Okay. Okay. So yeah. We may ask you
6 A. The net to All In One Investment, was 6 to -- to review your documents to refresh your
7 if I'm not mistaken, about 6,050,000. I don't 7 recollection so that you can provide testimony.
8 have it in front of me. 8 A. All right.
9 Q. So, we talked about some of the other 9 Q. Eddie, how do you know Vince Lago?
10 properties that you and/or All In One 10 A. I met Vince back in 2016. Mr. Vince
11 Investments Properties LLC owns, from here on 11 Lago was a Councilman in the Coral Gables -- in
12 forward when I talk about the property, I'm 12 Coral Gables. I was introduced to him by
13 talking about 3251 Ponce. Okay? 13 someone we both know, and he took me to preview
14 A. Sure. 14 the 3251 property, the one that we're talking
15 Q. Okay. So let's take a -- a short 15 about now, which I had seen multiple times, had
16 break and then come right back. 16 been listed and reduced multiple times.
17 MS. DE ALEJO: Thank you. 17 And he represented us in writing as
18 (Recess.) 18 the buyer's agent in the purchase of that
19 Q. Okay. So Eddie, we talked about some 19 property.
20 information about how many properties you own, 20 Q. When you said that you were introduced
21 and -- and how -- for how much you purchased 21 to Vince through someone you both know, who was
22 them. What documents would you want to look at 22 the person who introduced you?
23 in order to refresh your recollection of that 23 A. His name is Manny Garcia.
24 information? 24 Q. And why did Manny Garcia introduce you
25 A. The best documents to look at is the 25 to Vince?
Page 43 Page 45
1 actual closing statements. 1 A. Because Manny knew that I was looking
2 Q. Okay. And do you have those closing 2 for properties, somewhere in Dade County, and he
3 statements accessible to you today? 3 knew that Vince was the Councilman in Coral
4 A. Not right now. They're back at the 4 Gables, and that he was also a Realtor
5 office. No, they're not accessible to me today. 5 associate, and that he may have properties that
6 Q. Okay. 6 he can show me.
7 A. I'm more than happy to provide all the 7 Q. And what -- at the time when you met
8 documents you need for the questions you ask. I 8 him what was your impression of Vince Lago?
9 just want to make sure I don't give you the 9 A. Of Vince Lago? Vince Lago is very
10 wrong answer. I want to give you all the right 10 passionate about his city. He knows how the
11 exact answers. 11 whole process works. That's why he became Mayor
12 Q. Okay. 12 now, of the city of Coral Gables. He knows how
13 A. So if you want -- if you want the 13 the permitting works. He knows how the bills
14 closing statements, you can ask Alex for them, 14 that get presented get approved. He's -- he's
15 and we can provide them. 15 also involved in construction, engineering.
16 MS. DE ALEJO: I personally think 16 He's very knowledgeable.
17 they're irrelevant but I don't think there's 17 Q. So when you closed the property --
18 any reason to produce them. But I'm going 18 well, backup.
19 to -- I want to lodge that objection and we 19 Did Vince Lago represent you as the
20 could just get that offline and whether 20 seller's broker when you were selling the
21 there's any relevancy to producing that. 21 property?
22 But at this point I -- I -- we're not 22 A. No. Nobody represented us as a
23 agreeing to produce those documents. 23 seller's broker, no agent did. In mine there
24 THE WITNESS: Okay. 24 was nothing in writing.
25 MS. FISHFELD: Okay. 25 Q. And that's true for the entire span of
12 (Pages 42 - 45)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 46 Page 48
1 the time that you owned the property? 1 him.
2 A. That's correct. Only One Realty 2 Q. I'm asking that you -- did you pay any
3 represented the property as a listing agent when 3 commission to Vince Lago?
4 we listed the property. But that was it. 4 A. No. No. I didn't agree to any
5 Nobody else had anything in writing to represent 5 commission. The answer is no.
6 us. 6 Q. How do you know Manny Chamizo?
7 Q. I understand that no one had anything 7 A. That's an interesting story, based on
8 in writing, but that's your -- your testimony. 8 the current events. But I met Manny probably
9 But is it -- is it your testimony that, Vince 9 like 23 years ago, briefly. He was a commercial
10 Lago never represented are you as the seller's 10 realty at Forbes International, and I was
11 broker in connection with your sale of the 11 generating contracts from Realtors that worked
12 property? 12 there. I was in -- in mortgage lending. And
13 A. In writing, no. Did he bring -- did 13 that was briefly.
14 he bring potential -- 14 I later saw him, when I was looking to
15 Q. What about not in writing? 15 buy the property at 3251 multiple properties
16 A. Did he bring potential buyers? He 16 that I looked at, he was a listing agent, in one
17 did. Like every other Realtor that also did 17 of the properties in Coral Gables. I walked the
18 that. In -- in my -- so you understand in my 18 property, didn't like the property. So nothing
19 language, when you are represented, you sign a 19 came about that.
20 contract with them. That's in my knowledge and 20 And the next time I saw him when he
21 my language, that's basically what the broker's 21 came to the office with Vince.
22 guidance, guidelines. You represent someone you 22 Q. When did he come to the office with
23 have it in writing. 23 Vince?
24 Q. Did Vince Lago help you to find a 24 A. About 2017, maybe beginning of 2018.
25 buyer for the property? 25 Q. Why did Vince and Manny go to your
Page 47 Page 49
1 A. Vince Lago brought multiple buyers 1 office at that time?
2 with different offers, which at that time the 2 A. I guess you would have to ask Vince
3 offers, weren't what we were looking for, so we 3 that because Vince is the one that brought him.
4 didn't accept them. 4 At no time did I reach out to Chamizo.
5 Q. Did Vince Lago bring you Alex Alvarez 5 Q. Why did you understand that Vince and
6 as a potential buyer? 6 Manny were at your office?
7 A. I believe together him and Alex 7 A. Well, I had mentioned to Vince that we
8 Alvarez's agent Liz brought an offer to us which 8 were selling the property and to bring any
9 did not meet the terms that we were looking for. 9 offers that he had. So I -- I -- I know it was
10 So we -- we never signed it. Yes. If that's 10 that reason.
11 your question, the answer is yes. 11 Q. What was discussed during the meeting
12 Q. Okay. And you ultimately sold the 12 at your office when Vince and Manny were there?
13 property to Alex Alvarez, right? 13 A. What our terms were, and exactly what
14 A. There is a whole story to that. 14 we wanted if we were going to accept the
15 Obviously there was multiple years in the 15 contract.
16 process. But ultimately, after Vince Lago 16 Q. Did -- so at that meeting, were Vince
17 mentioned he didn't want anything to do with 17 and Manny presenting to you an offer for -- from
18 this transaction multiple times, and Manny 18 someone to purchase the property?
19 disappeared, we were only communicating with 19 A. They both presented different offers.
20 Vince, ultimately a couple years later, we 20 It wasn't only one offer. Apart from other
21 closed with Liz, and Alex contract, brand-new 21 brokers that also presented offers to us -- to
22 contract, different terms. 22 us.
23 Q. And you did not pay Vince Lago a 23 Q. Right. But in the meeting that you're
24 commission in that transaction, right? 24 referring to between you, Vince and Manny.
25 A. I didn't agree to any commission with 25 A. No. At -- at -- no, that first time
13 (Pages 46 - 49)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 50 Page 52
1 there was no offer. 1 different terms of the contract. And one of
2 Q. Okay. So they just came to your 2 them were that we were not going to pay any
3 office to discuss the terms that you were 3 commission. We wanted to net the sales price we
4 looking for to sell your property? 4 were asking for.
5 A. Correct. 5 Q. So at that time is it your testimony
6 Q. And did you understand Vince and Manny 6 that you expected the buyer to pay any
7 at that time were working together? 7 commissions to Manny -- Manny and Vince?
8 A. That's what I understood. I never 8 A. We were clear to every broker that
9 exactly asked him, nor did I understand why 9 brought an offer, or an LOI, or whatever it was,
10 Vince was bringing Chamizo, but that's what I 10 yes.
11 understood. 11 Q. Did you ever say to Manny or Vince
12 Q. Did there come a time when Manny and 12 that the broker would pay the seller's
13 Vince presented to you an offer to purchase the 13 commission, seller's agent's commission?
14 property from Alex Alvarez? 14 A. I'm sorry. Can you -- what do you
15 A. Yes. That day they brought an offer, 15 mean the broker would pay the seller's
16 mid morning, and they wanted us to answer it to 16 commission? You mean the buyer? The buyer?
17 execute the contract by the end of the day, 17 Q. I may have misspoken. I -- I meant to
18 which was impossible because a lot had to be 18 say, did you ever say to Manny or Vince that the
19 reviewed, and starting the terms weren't exactly 19 buyer would pay any seller's broker's
20 what we were asking for at all. 20 commission?
21 Q. And is it right that that was in 21 A. We were very clear when it came to who
22 around May, June 2018? 22 was going to pay commission, and it definitely
23 A. Yes. Yes. 23 was not going to be us.
24 Q. How did Manny and Vince present that 24 Q. So did you say that the buyer would
25 offer to you? 25 pay any seller's broker's commission?
Page 51 Page 53
1 A. They brought it in a contract. 1 A. Okay. Let me phrase it this way. We
2 Q. Well, did they present it to you in 2 always had our net amount. Anything above that
3 person at your office? 3 if we made our net amount, it didn't matter to
4 A. Yes. 4 us.
5 Q. Were both of them there? 5 Q. Okay. So based on what you just said,
6 A. I believe so, yes. 6 how -- if you get your net amount, and any --
7 Q. Was anyone else present other than 7 anything over that would be paid in a
8 you, Manny and Vince? 8 commission, who -- who would receive that
9 A. Adriana Fernandez. 9 commission?
10 Q. Anyone else? 10 A. If we netted what we were looking for,
11 A. No. 11 and the buyer and listing agent accepted the --
12 Q. Did you know Alex Alvarez before Manny 12 the sales price to be higher to pay the
13 and Vince presented this offer to you? 13 commission of the brokers, that was fine.
14 A. No. 14 That's not what was happening.
15 Q. At that time when Manny and Vince 15 Q. But who was going to receive the
16 presented to you the offer from Alex Alvarez, 16 commission?
17 was Alex Alvarez represented by a broker? 17 A. Who was going to -- I guess the
18 A. Yes. Elizabeth Diaz. 18 brokers once the -- once we netted what we were
19 Q. That's Liz Diaz, correct? 19 looking for, the brokers.
20 A. Correct. 20 Q. So did you expect that Manny Chamizo
21 Q. And at that time when Manny and Vince 21 would receive a commission?
22 presented to you the offer from Alex Alvarez, 22 A. I expected Manny and Vince to
23 was there any discussion about the payment of a 23 negotiate the contract, based on what -- the
24 commission? 24 terms we had explained to every Realtor, or
25 A. There was a lot of discussion about 25 broker that came to our office, with contracts,
14 (Pages 50 - 53)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 54 Page 56
1 is -- when they brought that contract, it was 1 computer. But if -- if that's very difficult,
2 not the terms we had requested. 2 then --
3 Q. Okay. So if it had been the terms you 3 A. It's not difficult. It's not
4 had requested, I -- I just want to understand 4 difficult. I have here the hard copy.
5 who -- 5 Q. Oh, Perfect. Great. Okay. So if you
6 A. Okay. So if would have -- if we would 6 could just look at Tab 1, please.
7 have netted -- if we would have netted what we 7 MS. DE ALEJO: It's not going to say
8 were looking for, and the rest on top of that 8 Tab 1, though. So make sure we just
9 net was added, the commission would have been 9 identify by Bates number to make sure he's
10 paid to the brokers. 10 looking at the correct document.
11 Q. And who were the brokers? 11 Q. Okay. Okay. So on the bottom
12 A. But we weren't paying -- but we 12 right-hand side of the --
13 weren't paying for the commission. Well, it 13 A. 01 -- 01 I see it. 01. Go ahead.
14 would have come out ultimately out of the 14 Q. Okay. And that's called a Bates
15 closing of the title company. 15 stamp, Eddie, for some reason.
16 Q. But who were the brokers? When you 16 A. Okay. Okay.
17 say the brokers, who are you referring to? 17 Q. All right. So if you can just take a
18 A. Well, in 3251 which is the property 18 moment to -- to review this document. And just
19 we're talking about, the brokers at that time 19 let me know when you've have had a moment to
20 that were negotiating that contract was Vince 20 just kind of familiarize yourself with it
21 Lago, Manny Chamizo and Elizabeth Diaz. 21 generally and then I will ask some questions.
22 Q. Okay. Did you expect to pay Vince 22 A. Okay.
23 directly a commission or would you have paid 23 Q. Okay. So if you go --
24 Manny the commission? 24 A. Where are you going to go, 01 to 02,
25 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 25 is that where it ends?
Page 55 Page 57
1 A. The agent that was on the contract, I 1 Q. Yes.
2 don't have the contract in front of me, would 2 A. 01 to 02?
3 have been paid directly at the time of closing 3 Q. Yes.
4 at the title company. 4 A. Okay. Go ahead.
5 Q. Okay. All right. Let's look at some 5 Q. If you go to 02?
6 documents. 6 A. Yes.
7 A. Sure. 7 Q. There is -- the first e-mail in this
8 Q. Okay. This is Tab 1 and I'd like to 8 thread is a July 19, 2017 e-mail from
9 enter this as Exhibit 1. 9 Vincente -- Vicente C. Lago, and it says: Eddie,
10 (E-mails were marked as Exhibit 10 I hope all is well. Could I show a building
11 Exhibit 1 for identification.) 11 tomorrow? I have a client that is interested.
12 MS. DE ALEJO: For record purposes, 12 What is the asking price?
13 will you just identify each one by the Bates 13 And then go to the bottom of AI01.
14 number as well. 14 You respond that's your e-mail address, right?
15 Q. Yes. This is AIO001 to 002. Now, 15 A. Right.
16 Eddie, did you, I've-- I've provided copies of 16 Q. You said: Vince, good to hear from
17 these to your counsel Alex. Do you have copies 17 you. Hope all is well. Yes. What time? I've
18 of these documents? 18 also been talking to Manny Chamizo on a client
19 A. I do have copies. I -- I think they 19 he has.
20 were provided today. Correct? 20 So what did you mean when you said,
21 Q. Yes. Yes. 21 I've also been talking with Manny Chamizo on a
22 A. I haven't had a chance -- I haven't 22 client he has?
23 had a chance to review them. 23 A. Well, once we met with him and Manny
24 Q. No. No. That's fine. It may be 24 Chamizo, Manny Chamizo also tried to bring other
25 easiest for you to open them up on your 25 buyers that Vince wasn't part of, that
15 (Pages 54 - 57)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 58 Page 60
1 negotiation. 1 Q. That's right.
2 Q. Okay. 2 A. What I see here.
3 A. Again, I think that Manny -- I think 3 Q. Right. Okay. So this --
4 that Manny went to his firm to another associate 4 Q. A02 -- A02 is on July. A02 is July,
5 that was bringing him offers or other lies. 5 19, 2017. So do I look for September?
6 Q. What were you talking to Manny about? 6 Q. Right. Now -- well, that's what I was
7 A. Definitely only about the buyers, or 7 going to ask you. I -- I see a date here
8 any potential LOIs, or contracts that he would 8 September 27, 2017.
9 bring, and what our terms were. 9 A. Okay. I see it. That's the text,
10 Q. And then the next line says, Sales 10 correct?
11 price is 5 million with 3 percent commission. 11 Q. Yes. Well, I -- I -- I'm going to ask
12 What did you mean by that? 12 you that. This appears to be a screenshot of a
13 A. Right. So at -- so at that time -- at 13 text message thread?
14 that time the 3 percent commission was going to 14 A. That's correct.
15 be paid based on 5. And that's where we 15 Q. And is this a text -- a screenshot of
16 started. 16 a text message like between you and Vince Lago?
17 And we would have netted what we were 17 A. It looks like it.
18 looking for once we paid that commission. But 18 Q. Okay. So if you go to Lago 16?
19 we continue to upgrade the building, update it, 19 A. Lago 16?
20 and the sales price based on the market kept on 20 Q. On the top of that page, there's a
21 going up, because of the market, because of the 21 text that says: Afternoon, Vince. It was great
22 profit on the market, and because of all the 22 talking to you again. The sales price is
23 work that we were doing to it. 23 6,355,000. Your commission on top of that
24 Q. When you said, Sales price is 5 24 amount.
25 million with 3 percent commission -- 25 A. Okay. I'm looking for Lago 16. Give
Page 59 Page 61
1 A. Right. 1 me a second. Hold on. Lago 37. That's not it,
2 Q. -- who did you understand would be 2 right? Lago A037. Diaz.
3 receiving that 3 percent commission? 3 Q. No. No. It -- so, do you see -- do
4 A. Well, in this case -- in this 4 you see Lago 14, which is the September 27, 2017
5 particular case, on this date, if they would 5 text? Let's start with that.
6 have brought the contract with those terms, and 6 A. I see an e-mail from September 19th.
7 other terms that we also needed on the contract, 7 Let me look at the text. I see Diaz. Give me a
8 and we would have executed, we would have paid 8 second.
9 the commission to the broker. 9 Q. I think. No, no. I think you're --
10 At this time he was not saying there 10 you're way too far. I -- if you go to the
11 was a cobroker. He was saying he was going to 11 bottom right of the page.
12 be the agent for the buyer. There was no other 12 A. Right.
13 cobroker. So he would have received the 13 Q. The -- the-- the page that Bates
14 commission. 14 stamped Lago 14.
15 Q. And you were going to pay that 15 A. Lago 14. Just give a second. Let me
16 commission, right? 16 find it.
17 A. Based on what we were going to net at 17 Q. No problem.
18 that time because of that sales price, yes. 18 A. This was just printed out today.
19 Q. Okay. Now we'll go to Tab 2, which I 19 Q. Okay. It would be probably like one
20 will identify it for you. Tab 2, and it's -- 20 of the first -- it would be very -- I think it
21 and -- and I'd like to enter it as Exhibit 2, is 21 would be near the beginning of your stack of
22 Lago 14 to 16. 22 papers, if they were printed in chronological
23 (Text messages were marked as Exhibit 23 order.
24 2 for identification.) 24 A. Okay. Lago 14 is that's what you're
25 A. Okay. That's September. Right? 25 asking me for?
16 (Pages 58 - 61)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 62 Page 64
1 Q. Right. Lago 14 through Lago 15. 1 Q. So long as the purchase price was over
2 A. Okay. 2 5.3 million, you were going to pay the brokers a
3 Q. Is that it? 3 commission?
4 A. Go ahead. 4 A. Right. So again, there were many
5 Q. Okay. And I'm -- I'm going to ask a 5 terms that had to be met, but that was one of
6 different question then -- then from before. So 6 them. We also had to stay in the property
7 looking at Lago 14. This appears to be a text 7 leasing it until we found a new property and
8 dated September 27, 2017. Right? 8 moved out. So it was multiple terms that had to
9 A. Correct. 9 be met on the -- on the contract. But that was
10 Q. And it says Vince, at this time our 10 one of them. That was one of them.
11 net needs to be 5.3 million. Anything on top of 11 Q. Okay. So you intended to pay a
12 that could be commission. What do you mean by 12 commission. You just -- you didn't know how
13 that? 13 much it would be at this point, right?
14 A. As long as we netted the 5.3, whatever 14 A. I -- I had no idea because that would
15 commission they wanted to place on top of the 15 have been negotiated between the brokers, which
16 sales price, was fine with us. That's what -- 16 would have been the buyer's agent representing
17 at this time our net needs to be 5.3. So if you 17 the buyers.
18 notice, as we continued rehabbing the building 18 All I know and what we were looking
19 from July to September of 20 -- the price went 19 for was our sales price, our net that we needed
20 up because it continued to cost us more in 20 at the time the contracts were coming in, based
21 constructions and so forth, and the market was 21 on the market and what we had spent on the
22 going up. So I'm being very specific, on what 22 buildings.
23 our numbers are doing. 23 Q. Right. But so long as this can -- all
24 And I'm also saying if we get to the 24 these conditions were met, you knew you would be
25 end of the project, of the rehabbing and we -- 25 paying a commission? It just wasn't -- you
Page 63 Page 65
1 and everything we're doing, at that time, again, 1 didn't know how much it would be?
2 I didn't know how much more it was going to cost 2 A. That's correct. So the -- for
3 us, it will be closer to 5.8 our net. So from 3 instance the 5 -- the 5.8 that we needed to net
4 5.3 million to 5.8 million. But again, it was 4 as we got closer to completing the construction,
5 changing because the market was changing. The 5 if the offer would have come in for seven
6 money we were investing into it was changing. 6 million, that means the brokers had negotiated
7 And commission on top. 7 1.2 million to earn their commissions.
8 Q. So at this time, you didn't know 8 I -- I'm not -- I wasn't going to be a
9 exactly how much commission would be paid on 9 party to that. I just make sure that the sales
10 this, right? 10 price that was on there, once we paid the
11 A. The only time I know what commissions 11 commission and everything netted is what we were
12 they want, as long as they were made, is when 12 looking for.
13 we're present the offer with our net, and there 13 Q. Okay. So however much over the net
14 is additional, the sales price is higher, that's 14 price was going to be paid in commissions to
15 the only way I know the commissions of the 15 both the buyer and the seller's broker, however
16 brokers that are waiting to accept. 16 they split that up was between them?
17 Q. Okay. So -- 17 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
18 A. For example, based on this text, if -- 18 A. It was between them. Yes.
19 if we needed to net 5.3 and the sales price came 19 Q. Okay. Okay. Let's go to Tab 3, and
20 in at 5.5, well, that means the brokers wanted 20 I'll identify that for you. Okay. So the next
21 to make $200,000 commission because it would 21 document, Eddie, is Lago 21 to Lago 22.
22 have been on top of the 5.3. 22 A. Okay. Go ahead.
23 Q. So at this time, at the time of this 23 Q. Okay. And I would like to enter this
24 text? 24 as Exhibit 3.
25 A. Yes. 25 (Text messages was marked as Exhibit 3
17 (Pages 62 - 65)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 66 Page 68
1 for identification.) 1 for.
2 Q. Okay. If you -- if you look at Lago 2 Q. How is that true because you were
3 22, there's a text on the top of the page, that 3 looking for a net of 5.8 million so if --
4 starts with, I just spoke to Manny. Do you see 4 A. Right. And -- and they wanted to --
5 that? 5 they wanted to make 3 percent commission. So
6 A. Yes. Yes. 6 5.9 times 3 percent would have put us below 5.8.
7 Q. And -- and in order to understand the 7 Q. Okay. Where are you getting the 3
8 date of that text we have to go to the prior 8 percent from?
9 page Lago 21, and you can see there there's a 9 A. Initially that's what they had asked
10 date of March 5, 2018. Okay? 10 us for, which is in one of those texts. Yeah.
11 A. Okay. Lago 21. Okay. 11 Q. Well, here you said net to us 5.8
12 Q. Do you see there March 5, 2018? 12 million all commissions go on top.
13 A. March 5, 2018, yes. 13 A. Right.
14 Q. Okay. So on Lago 2, the 2 the top of 14 Q. So you countered at 5.9, and you
15 the page, and this is a text message between you 15 needed to net 5.8. Doesn't that mean that he
16 and Vince, right? 16 would be getting a -- a commission of $100,000?
17 A. Correct. 17 A. No. It's actually a little more.
18 Q. Is -- is that right? 18 He -- he was requesting that I counter at 5.85.
19 A. Yes I just spoke to Manny. Yes I 19 So $50,000 more than our net paying the 3
20 spoke to Manny. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I was 20 percent commission. So we wouldn't have netted
21 reading out loud. I'm sorry. I won't do that. 21 less than the 5.8.
22 So I reiterate, he's trying to -- they're trying 22 Q. But here it just says net to us 5.8
23 to explain to me that the buyer may not accept 23 million all commissions go on top.
24 to pay a commission. What -- that's the first 24 A. Correct.
25 text. 25 Q. So like we've talked about before, you
Page 67 Page 69
1 I'm reiterating, what we have been 1 didn't know how much the commission would be.
2 reiterating the whole time. Is net to us $5.8 2 It was going to be however much over 5.8?
3 million, our commission on top, to lease about 3 A. Correct. So initially from the texts
4 for a year or less to find a new building, and 4 that we just went over, it was going to be 3
5 then they say let me speak with the agent. 5 percent initially and on top. Remember we
6 Q. So, when -- in Vincent's top text, 6 started at 5.3. And we're already at 5.8 and
7 when he says, his buyer is going to request that 7 kept ongoing up because of the market, and the
8 the seller pay the commission, counter at 5.9 8 construction we were doing.
9 firm, what does that mean? What does "counter 9 Q. Okay. So it's your testimony that at
10 at 5.9 firm" mean? 10 this point you were going to pay a commission of
11 A. That -- that means from the 5.9, we 11 3 percent?
12 have to pay the commission. So we were not 12 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
13 going to net the 5.8 we were looking for. It 13 A. It's my testimony that whatever they
14 would be lower. And I'm reiterating we need to 14 wanted to get paid was going to be up to them.
15 net this amount. It doesn't matter what you put 15 Whether it was 1 percent, $100, whatever it was.
16 on top. Apart from the lease back and a couple 16 It had to be on top of our net.
17 of other terms. 17 Q. Okay. And your net was 5.8 million at
18 Q. So, and I'm -- I'm not quite 18 this time, right?
19 following. I'm sorry for that? But -- 19 A. At that time, correct.
20 A. That's okay. That's okay. 20 Q. So he's asking you to counter at 5.9,
21 Q. When it says "counter at 5.9 firm," is 21 right?
22 he saying that you should counter at 5.9 firm? 22 A. He's asking me to counter at 5.85.
23 A. That's exactly what he's asking me to 23 Q. Well, no. Above that. No. Above
24 do, because the 5.9 paying his commission 24 that.
25 wouldn't have netted the 5.8 we were looking 25 A. Another option -- another option is
18 (Pages 66 - 69)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 70 Page 72
1 that we counter at 5.85. 1 they would have said here is counter at 5.9 and
2 Q. Right. So. 2 only pay us $100,000, not the percent we want,
3 A. He's asking 5.85. 3 we would have accepted that offer apart from all
4 Q. Okay. I want to talk about the other 4 the other contingencies that we had that were in
5 option counter at 5.85. But first I want to 5 the contract, and talking to our CPAs and so on
6 talk about the first option, which is at the top 6 and so forth.
7 of the text, which says counter at 5.9 firm. Do 7 But that's not what they did. This --
8 you see that? 8 this is a very easy form of negotiating
9 A. Yes. 9 contracts.
10 Q. That's $100,000 more than 5.8 million, 10 When you know what your seller wants
11 right? 11 to net, you go ahead and you bring the offer
12 A. Correct. 12 what your sellers mainly wants to -- wants to
13 Q. So that shows that Vince was going to 13 net. And whatever your commission is goes on
14 get a commission of $100,000, right? 14 top.
15 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 15 It's -- it's a simple way of
16 A. At that time they had talked about 3 16 negotiating, actually. Bring a contract, I want
17 percent commission at that time. Again, this is 17 to net this amount and this amount, put your
18 a text. It is not a written contract. But at 18 commissions on top, whatever you want to make.
19 that time based on the text, based on the 19 Q. Okay. So you have been -- you've been
20 conversations we had when we first met, we were 20 telling me about like the -- the 3 percent
21 talking about 3 percent. 21 commission, that you think Vince is after?
22 If they would have told us in this 22 A. That's right. Correct. That's how it
23 text, we will only make $100,000, this counter 23 started. That's how it started.
24 at 5.9 and you get your 5.8, we would have said, 24 Q. That's how it started. And you're
25 perfect. Write the offer up. Leasing this back 25 saying, net to us 5.8 million, all commissions
Page 71 Page 73
1 and all the other contingencies we had. 1 go on top. So that's what you were telling
2 So if this text would have read, let's 2 Vince is how he would be paid a commission,
3 counter at 5.9. We make $100,000. You get your 3 right?
4 5.8, I would have said, yes. But that's not 4 A. Correct. Now, if he would have told
5 what he was texting me based on the commission 5 me, you know what, Eddie, let's start with 5.9
6 they wanted to make. 6 and we will only make $100,000 commission on
7 That's why I reiterated what our 7 this, I would have said, perfect. Now let's
8 position was. 8 make sure all the other terms are in the
9 Q. Right. Your -- your position was net 9 contract. Present the offer and we will have an
10 to you 5.8, right? 10 executed contract.
11 A. Right. 11 Q. Okay. Thank you. Let's go to Tab 4.
12 Q. And all commissions go on top, right? 12 A. What am I looking for?
13 A. Correct. 13 Q. Tab 4 is Diaz 92?
14 Q. So based on that agreement, if you 14 A. Okay. Hold on a second. Is that a
15 closed the sale for 5.9, Vince and Manny would 15 text or an e-mail?
16 have gotten a commission for $100,000, right? 16 Q. It is an e-mail.
17 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 17 A. Okay. Let me go to e-mails. E-mail
18 A. Correct. But that's not what he's 18 Diaz, right?
19 saying in this text based on that we started -- 19 Q. Diaz 92 to 96.
20 we started at 3 percent in the original 20 A. Hold on. I'm sorry. I don't see
21 conversations that they wanted to make. 21 Diaz. I have Diaz from 137 to 139, 141, 142.
22 The original conversations they wanted 22 Yeah. I -- I don't have Diaz starting with
23 to make 3 percent. So based on the original 23 those numbers. Let me -- yeah.
24 conversations, the texts and everything we 24 Q. Okay. I can -- I can just put it on
25 talked about from when they presented at 5.9, if 25 the screen then.
19 (Pages 70 - 73)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 74 Page 76
1 A. Yeah. I -- I will read it on the 1 purchase price. Please replace with as agreed
2 screen. Go ahead. 2 to by the seller and the two brokers, each
3 Q. Okay. So since this is an e-mail, 3 broker will be entitled to a commission of
4 the -- the e-mail thread begins at the end. So 4 $100,000 or a total commission of $200,000 upon
5 I'm going to scroll to the end first. 5 the closing of this transaction.
6 A. Okay. Okay. 6 Did I read that correctly?
7 Q. So this is Diaz 96. Oh, and Carol, 7 A. Yes, you did.
8 I -- I'd like to enter this as Exhibit 4, 8 Q. Okay. So where did this value of
9 please. 9 $100,000 to each broker come from?
10 (E-mails was marked as Exhibit 4 for 10 A. If you notice, at no time is our
11 identification.) 11 attorney saying that we are going to pay the
12 Q. Okay. So we're -- this is the end. 12 commission.
13 Let's go to this e-mail that starts on Diaz 95. 13 Apparently, the brokers had decided on
14 A. Right. 14 top of our net they were going to place -- place
15 Q. Okay. So I'm looking at Diaz 95 where 15 that commission, on top of our net, but not that
16 I am indicating to you. Do you generally 16 we were going to pay the commission. That the
17 recognize this e-mail? 17 brokers had decided on that commission.
18 A. I do. 18 Q. Where did this $100,000 come from?
19 Q. You do, okay. So is this -- and this 19 A. I -- I've never ever negotiated the
20 is an e-mail between Troy Nader, Esquire and 20 commissions, neither did our attorney for the
21 Louis Montello, right? 21 brokers. That was up to them to negotiate their
22 A. Correct. 22 own commissions on top of the net that we
23 Q. Dated June 4, 2018? 23 wanted.
24 A. That's what it says, yes. 24 Q. Okay. So did the value of $100,000 to
25 Q. And this is an e-mail regarding the 25 each broker come from the fact that your net
Page 75 Page 77
1 sale of 3251 Ponce de Leon, right? 1 needed to be 5.8 million, and he was offering
2 A. Correct. 2 5.96 million?
3 Q. Troy Nader that was -- that's your 3 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
4 attorney, right? 4 A. I mean, if we would have netted 5.8,
5 A. Correct. 5 and he would have told us -- again, this is not
6 Q. And Louis Montello is the buyer's 6 the brokers agreeing. This is an attorney
7 attorney, right? 7 conversation that we're not even on.
8 A. Correct. 8 So if, A, the brokers agreed to that,
9 Q. Okay. So this is an e-mail from Troy 9 we never found out. And as for the text that
10 to Louis. And your attorney is setting forth 10 was sent to us, he never accepted to make
11 changes required to the contract. Right? 11 $100,000 with the counter of 5.9.
12 A. Correct. 12 If he on the counter would have said,
13 Q. So is -- is it your recollection that 13 we are only going to make $100,000, we would
14 the buyer had sent a draft contract over and 14 have accepted apart from all the other
15 your attorney was now setting forth your changes 15 contingencies.
16 that are required to the contract? 16 Q. Well, your net -- your net was 5.8,
17 A. Correct. 17 right?
18 Q. Okay. And there are a number of items 18 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
19 listed here. 19 A. Right.
20 A. Yes. 20 Q. All commissions on top of that, right?
21 Q. And I want to ask you about number 5. 21 A. Right.
22 A. Okay. 22 Q. And so if your lawyer is saying to put
23 Q. Okay. It says section 16 brokerage 23 in here a brokerage commission of $200,000, that
24 commission. Please delete the sentence starting 24 means that the purchase price would have to be
25 with at and upon closing and ending with the 25 $6 million, right?
20 (Pages 74 - 77)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 78 Page 80
1 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 1 A. Okay. What is not listed in this
2 A. As long as we were netted on price of 2 e-mail from what I can see is the sales price,
3 what we wanted, yes. 3 number one.
4 Q. Okay. 4 Number two, I am not agreeing as
5 A. At that time. 5 seller to pay any commission unless we net what
6 Q. Right. 6 we want to. If I'm not mistaken, that's what it
7 A. At that time. One of the other -- 7 says here. There is no sales price so I cannot
8 other contingencies on the contract had to be 8 give you a definite answer on what they were
9 that whatever was in escrow, if the buyer didn't 9 talking about.
10 close we would keep that escrow, which the 10 Now, if this e-mail would have said at
11 leasing -- the selling agent and the buyer were 11 this time, in the market, it would have said the
12 against, they didn't want to place that on the 12 sales price must be six million and you agree to
13 contract. 13 make $100,000 and we agree to make $100,000 and
14 We were concerned that if we would 14 Eddie will net the 5.8, then his e-mail would
15 have closed and bought the other building and 15 have been written correctly. But he's missing
16 they wouldn't have closed with us, we would have 16 the sales price, what the sales price would be.
17 been left with two buildings. 17 Q. Okay. And so that is what you
18 Q. Okay. Let's go to Tab 5, please, 18 understand the agreement to have been as of
19 which is MDLV115. And it's an e-mail thread. 19 May 28, 2018?
20 A. Okay. I'm reading based on what you 20 A. Yes. Based on this e-mail -- we
21 have on the screen. 21 didn't agree to them -- okay. We didn't agree
22 Q. Okay. 22 to what they were going to make. That was not
23 A. Okay. 23 what we agreed on. We were set on our net. We
24 Q. Okay. And I would like to enter this 24 wanted our net. And whatever came on top was
25 as Exhibit 5. 25 great. As the market went -- and went along,
Page 79 Page 81
1 (E-mails were marked as Exhibit 5 for 1 the sales price got -- became more higher
2 identification.) 2 because what we invested were higher and the
3 Q. Okay. First of all, have you ever 3 market changed.
4 seen this e-mail before today? 4 Q. So you told that to Manny and Vince as
5 A. No. 5 of May 28, 2018, right?
6 Q. Okay. This appears to be an e-mail 6 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
7 thread between Manny and Elizabeth Diaz? 7 A. I told him -- I told him and every
8 A. Okay. 8 other Realtor and broker that brought LOIs or
9 Q. And this one that we're looking at on 9 come -- we had a conversation. During the whole
10 MDLV116 is from Manny to Liz Diaz dated May 28, 10 process this was our net and put your commission
11 2018. 11 on top.
12 A. Okay. 12 Q. Okay. So then continuing on with the
13 Q. And Manny says in the e-mail: On 350 13 e-mail thread after Liz said $100,000? That is
14 we have 3. And then in a new paragraph he says 14 too low how can we increase that. Manny
15 on 3851 he's paying a flat $100,000 to each 15 responds: I agree. But that is all he's
16 broker. 16 willing to pay. Plus I split that with another
17 A. Okay. 17 agent in my office.
18 Q. And then Liz replies: $100,000? That 18 So my question is: At this time, May
19 is too low. How can we increase that? 19 2018, did you -- did you understand that Manny
20 A. Okay. 20 was going to split any commission with another
21 Q. So -- so based on this e-mail that's 21 agent?
22 dated May 28, 2018, do you have a recollection 22 A. I -- I was not involved in this
23 of telling Manny that you would pay a flat 23 conversation so I don't know what they were
24 $100,000 commission to each broker in connection 24 thinking or saying.
25 with the sale of the property? 25 Q. No. No. I know that.
21 (Pages 78 - 81)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 82 Page 84
1 A. Yes. I can't tell you what they were 1 you're saying.
2 thinking, or what they were talking about, or if 2 A. Okay. Yeah.
3 there was even this contract, or if there was an 3 Q. Okay. So let's go to the next tab,
4 LOI, or was it talking about another offer. 4 which is Tab 6.
5 I -- I cannot tell you that. 5 A. Okay.
6 Q. I -- I'm -- I'm not asking you to tell 6 Q. Eddie, are you doing okay or would you
7 me what he is thinking. I -- I'm just using 7 like to take a break or anything?
8 this as a jumping off point to ask you whether 8 A. No. That's okay. Let's -- let's keep
9 you knew at this time, that Manny was going to 9 going forward.
10 split any commission with another agent. 10 Q. Just let me know.
11 A. No. The only -- the only time I knew 11 A. I mean, you're going to see me --
12 that was when Vince and Manny came and they seem 12 you're going to see me stretching my neck and my
13 to be working together. But each one of them 13 mouth, because my mouth tends to stiffen up and
14 was having different conversations with me about 14 my neck stiffen up, but I'm fine.
15 different buyers. 15 Q. Okay. Just let me know.
16 Q. Okay. So, I guess, let me put it like 16 A. Thank you.
17 this: Did you understand that you -- if you 17 Q. Okay. So this is Tab 6. It is AIO424
18 received your net 5.8 million and the purchase 18 to 445.
19 price came in for more than that, and -- which 19 A. Okay. AIO424 to 445, and that's the
20 would trigger a commission payment, did you 20 purchase agreement, right. Let me look for it
21 understand that Manny would split his portion 21 and see if I can find it here.
22 with Vince? 22 Q. Okay.
23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 23 A. Okay. Go ahead.
24 A. I didn't know the arrangement they had 24 Q. Okay. So do you recognize this
25 specifically. So I -- I -- all I know is that 25 document?
Page 83 Page 85
1 they came in together to talk to me. And then 1 A. Yes. I mean I recognize the purchase
2 they started bringing different buyers, 2 agreement. I would have to read through it.
3 different loan LOIs, letters of intent, so on 3 But I -- I understand what a purchase and sale
4 and so forth. 4 agreement is.
5 I don't know the arrangement they had. 5 Q. Okay. And if -- if I haven't already
6 I wasn't involved in those conversations. 6 entered this as an exhibit, I -- I need to. I
7 Q. Okay. So did you have any 7 would like to enter this as Exhibit 6.
8 understanding that Manny and Vince would share 8 (Purchase Agreement was marked as
9 any commission Manny received in any way? 9 Exhibit 6 for identification.)
10 A. It seemed that they were working 10 Q. So I know you said that you recognize
11 together with some buyers, but I didn't 11 this generally as -- as?
12 understand what the commission was going to be 12 A. Correct.
13 or how it was going to be split between them. 13 Q. As a purchase and sale agreement.
14 Q. Okay. 14 And -- and then, of course, you see a red text
15 A. And as far as I know, Vince -- I mean 15 across the front page that says, ML draft
16 this e-mail Manny is talking about an agent in 16 6/14/18 marked, right?
17 his office. As far as I know Vince never worked 17 A. Okay.
18 in Manny's office. So he must be talking about 18 Q. So does this appear to be a draft
19 another agent that I never even met. 19 purchase and sale agreement for the sale of the
20 If you notice, plus I split with 20 property between AIO and 3251 property LLC?
21 another agent in my office, I never -- as far as 21 A. Yes. I haven't read the whole
22 I know they never worked together in the same 22 purchase agreement, but it seems to be, yes,
23 office. 23 yes.
24 Q. Yes. Yes. I think he was just saying 24 Q. And 3251 property LLC, was that the
25 that as a shorthand, but -- but I -- I know what 25 LLC created by Alex Alvarez?
22 (Pages 82 - 85)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 86 Page 88
1 A. Yes. I believe so. I didn't create 1 A. Correct.
2 it for her. 2 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
3 Q. Okay. So if you can please go to 3 Q. And Vince would not have received a
4 AIO438. 4 commission from you?
5 A. Okay. 438. Okay. 5 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
6 Q. If you look at the section 16, it says 6 A. I -- I've answered the question.
7 section 16 brokerage. 7 Vince and Manny were working together and
8 A. Give me a second. I'm in 438. I see 8 separately with different buyers. I don't know
9 section 14, section 16 brokerage buyer and 9 the commission arrangement they had.
10 seller equal represent and warrant -- 10 I don't know if Chamizo would have
11 Q. Eddie, Eddie, it -- it would be -- 11 written Vince a -- a check after the closing. I
12 it's better if you just read it silently to 12 wasn't part of the conversations when they came
13 yourself. 13 to these commissions. I wasn't there. And if
14 A. Okay. I will read it to myself. 14 Manny would have written him a check afterwards,
15 Okay. Give me a second. 15 that's between them.
16 Q. Sure. 16 Q. Okay. So let's go then to Tab 7.
17 A. Okay. I've read it. 17 A. Tab 7.
18 Q. Okay. So in this draft contract, 18 Q. Yes. Which is AIO72?
19 which is a draft -- this draft contract is from 19 A. To.
20 June 4, 2018, right? 20 Q. To 74.
21 A. Yes, okay. 21 A. Okay.
22 Q. And the draft contract lists Manny 22 Q. And I would like to enter this as
23 Chamizo as the seller's broker, right? 23 Exhibit 7.
24 A. Yes. 24 (E-mail was marked as Exhibit 7 for
25 Q. And it lists Elizabeth Diaz as the 25 identification.)
Page 87 Page 89
1 buyer's broker? 1 A. Okay.
2 A. Yes. 2 Q. Okay. So are you -- do you recognize
3 Q. So why doesn't it say that -- why 3 this e-mail?
4 doesn't this draft contract list Vince as the 4 A. Yes.
5 seller's broker? 5 Q. It's an e-mail from you to Manny with
6 A. You would have to ask Manny that. 6 two people copied on the e-mail. It's -- I see
7 I -- I don't know. I have no idea. And also 7 the name Elizabeth Diaz and I also see Yahoo
8 this -- this draft markup is dated 6/14/18. We 8 mail. Do you recognize Yahoo mail as
9 canceled it on June 20th because all the terms 9 identifying Vince Lago's e-mail?
10 that we were looking for were not in the 10 A. I -- I -- I believe that's -- that's
11 contract. 11 the e-mail he uses for any business that he
12 Q. Yes. And I -- I have that June 20th 12 does.
13 e-mail next up, to -- to talk about. Before we 13 Q. Okay. And it's dated June 20, 2018,
14 get to that -- 14 right?
15 A. Okay. 15 A. Correct.
16 Q. -- if this -- if this draft contract 16 Q. So in the e-mail you say: Good
17 had been signed, the agreement was that Manny 17 afternoon, after giving this contract serious
18 would receive a -- a $100,000 commission and Liz 18 considerations, we have decided not to accept
19 Diaz would receive $100,000 commission, right? 19 the contract.
20 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 20 When you say that you gave the
21 A. If this contract would have been 21 contract serious consideration, what did you
22 executed by all parties, that's what it seems 22 mean by that?
23 like, yes. 23 A. That we read the whole proposed
24 Q. Okay. And that's your recollection, 24 contract. We read the terms that they had
25 right? 25 listed. And that it didn't meet what we are
23 (Pages 86 - 89)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 90 Page 92
1 looking for, as far as the terms, so on and so 1 And they knew what I was talking about when I
2 forth. That's why I write this e-mail. 2 sent that e-mail.
3 In fact, I even say -- I -- I even say 3 Q. And when you said that after giving
4 that if it was three months before it would have 4 this contract serious consideration, do you feel
5 been a different story. But the market had 5 like you -- you did give the contract serious
6 changed. The -- the cost of construction was 6 consideration?
7 higher. 7 A. My whole career I've always taken
8 What we needed in the terms, the buyer 8 every negotiation contract conversation that has
9 was not willing to accept. And this was me 9 to do with real estate, I've always taken it
10 being ethical and professional, and letting him 10 very serious. I've been in this career for over
11 know that we were moving on. 11 24 years on one side or the other.
12 Q. So I think you kind of explained a 12 Q. Then you say, Manny and Vince, thank
13 little bit, but I -- I would like to ask for 13 you for all your hard work and we are truly
14 more detail. When you say in the e-mail three 14 sorry for the results of this contract.
15 months ago it would have been a different story, 15 What did you mean when you said that?
16 what did you mean by that? 16 A. What we meant was on this particular
17 A. So three months ago -- this was in 17 contract and other LOIs that they presented, the
18 June. Three months ago if they would have 18 contracts, they were working, trying to make a
19 presented the contract with the exact terms that 19 buck, but unfortunately they never brought the
20 we were looking for with the exact net that we 20 terms that we were looking for.
21 wanted, with the escrow we wanted left after we 21 Quite honestly, if I'm -- if I'm
22 closed that they would lose so on and so forth, 22 representing a buyer, I know what the seller
23 we would have accepted it. 23 wants and I don't have a contract that's going
24 But three months later we're still 24 to meet what the seller wants, I'm not
25 going back and forth. The market has changed. 25 presenting anything. I'm not wasting my time,
Page 91 Page 93
1 Construction has -- price has gone higher. So 1 or the buyer's time, or the seller's time. I'm
2 we're moving on. 2 not wasting anybody's time.
3 And I'm letting him know at this 3 Q. Well, but this wasn't a waste of time,
4 time -- at that time, at that particular moment 4 right, because you gave the contract serious
5 when I sent the e-mail, the building would not 5 consideration?
6 be in the market. 6 A. I -- I give every conversation I have
7 But again, this happens all the time 7 with every buyer, with everybody I give a
8 in negotiations of contracts. It's part of 8 serious consideration and talk.
9 what -- what is done, the way you negotiate, 9 I mean, I don't think what they want
10 the -- the time it takes. 10 and what they need. And if I can meet those,
11 Q. So your reference to if this had been 11 what they're looking for. If not, I don't waste
12 three months ago -- 12 their time. I mean, I -- I felt this was a very
13 A. Right. 13 professional e-mail to them. Letting them know
14 Q. -- is that -- is that a reference to 14 what our feelings was.
15 like the market changing? 15 And -- and there is more after this
16 A. That's a reference to what we were 16 e-mail how things turned around the following
17 seeing in the market that there was no 17 week. And I'm sure you don't want to talk about
18 properties and the properties that existed were 18 this right now. That's fine.
19 over priced and needed a lot of work. 19 But that's when all the e-mails
20 That was in reference to the -- what 20 started, the texts, the threatening text. Vince
21 we needed, the buyers needed in escrow. And 21 met with me at breakfast, didn't want to go
22 that we needed to stay for up to year, maybe it 22 forward, didn't want to be part of that group
23 would have been less, because it turned out to 23 text with Fernando Benitez. He was ashamed.
24 be less. 24 Chamizo whenever gets extra money, he drinks.
25 That was a reference to many things. 25 That's what he does. He sends those texts with
24 (Pages 90 - 93)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 94 Page 96
1 them. And there's a lot of stories behind that. 1 why you apologized to Manny and Vince.
2 I know you don't want to talk about that right 2 A. I apologize to buyers that didn't have
3 now. 3 the right credit scores and couldn't get them
4 Q. We will. But -- but right now, I -- I 4 approved to buy a home. That's just who I am.
5 do want to talk about this -- this e-mail right 5 I -- I don't think I'm -- I'm bigger or better
6 now. 6 than anybody else. I apologize. I -- good
7 A. Sure. Absolutely. 7 afternoon. I give greetings. That's who I am.
8 Q. So why did you apologize to Manny and 8 In fact, in fact, when I sent this
9 Vince in this e-mail? 9 e-mail, if I was on their side, I would have
10 A. Because I felt I'm professional. I've 10 taken it as, okay. We're going to get Eddie and
11 never apologized -- never apologized to buyers 11 Adrian the contract with the terms they want.
12 when I've attempted to approve them for a loan 12 If not, we will continue to waste our time,
13 because they don't have the credit scores 13 their time and everybody's time. So let's not
14 needed. 14 do anything else until we have the right
15 I've apologized to them because I 15 contract.
16 wasn't helping -- I wasn't able to buy a -- to 16 That's how I would have interpreted
17 help them buy a home. Even though it wasn't my 17 this e-mail. And I would have kept the lines of
18 fault that their credit looks like it does. 18 communication open after this e-mail and not
19 That's just who I am. Every human I stay with I 19 started this whole chaos of threatening texts
20 greet. I ask if they're having a good day. I 20 and everything that came after that.
21 mean, that's who I am. 21 I would have kept the lines of
22 Q. So were you apologizing because you 22 communication open with the listing agent, with
23 knew that they would be disappointed that you 23 the selling agent.
24 were canceling the contract? 24 Q. You also -- you also apologized to
25 A. I don't know how they were going to 25 Elizabeth. Elizabeth, I apologize to your
Page 95 Page 97
1 feel. I just wanted them to know what we were 1 client and you.
2 thinking at that time that I sent the e-mail. I 2 A. Same response.
3 don't know how they were going to take it, how 3 Q. Why is that?
4 they were going to feel. 4 A. Same response. Same response. The
5 I mean, if they're -- they're in -- 5 deal didn't happen. The terms were not there.
6 they're in the real estate they're -- they had 6 I'm sending an e-mail. I'm letting them know
7 been involved in commercial transactions, they 7 specifically what we're going to do at that time
8 know how this works. There's no reason to get 8 specifically.
9 upset or disappointed. You just keep going 9 We've been very specific. We were
10 forward. 10 very specific the whole time, the whole time.
11 I know the ways of making a deal 11 There was no wiggle room for doubt when we got
12 happen. And if you know what the terms are from 12 this offer and they missed this, and the terms
13 the beginning from day one, it makes it even 13 aren't there and they may sign it because we
14 easier. Bring a contract that makes sense to 14 didn't know this.
15 the sellers. 15 No. No. Every broker that we talked
16 Q. Right. But you -- you apologized to 16 to or met with knew exactly what we were looking
17 them in this e-mail, because you -- you knew 17 for and what our terms were. It was very clear.
18 that they were accepting and hoping to get a 18 Q. I -- I hear you. And I -- and I
19 commission and canceling the contract meant that 19 understand that. But I don't feel that that's
20 they weren't going to get it, right? 20 answering the question, which is why did you
21 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form. 21 feel like an apology was appropriate?
22 A. I think I have answered the question. 22 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
23 I'm sorry. I've answered the question multiple 23 A. I -- I -- there's no other way I can
24 times why I sent this e-mail. 24 answer the question you're asking me. Because
25 Q. Well, no, not why you sent the e-mail, 25 I've already answered it. Normally --
25 (Pages 94 - 97)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 98 Page 100
1 normally -- 1 and nobody was making the right offer to us.
2 Q. Why -- why did you feel an apology was 2 Quite frankly, we -- we wanted to take a break.
3 appropriate? 3 Everybody take a step back. Look at your -- the
4 A. Normally, normally in every realty 4 offers you're making. Put something together
5 transaction where there are attorneys involved, 5 that you know we want so we can execute and move
6 normally the attorney representing either party 6 forward.
7 sends the e-mail that their client is canceling. 7 In fact, during that time, a couple
8 However, I have had a great 8 days before Vince and Manny came to the office,
9 relationship with Vince. Manny, I had no 9 and they took me on a tour ride of Coral Gables
10 relationship. Vince, a very good relationship. 10 and the buildings that weren't even listed.
11 I mean, he was part of -- he was going to be 11 They were off the market, that they thought they
12 Mayor of Coral Gables. I wanted to keep that 12 could speak to the sellers to reach terms in the
13 business relationship. 13 budget that we had to buy. So they took me to
14 So that's why I sent this e-mail. I 14 multiple buildings in Coral Gables. Sometimes
15 didn't ask an attorney -- our attorney to send 15 the owners were there, sometimes they were not.
16 the e-mail because out of respect, actually for 16 And all I saw was classy buildings
17 Vince and Elizabeth, I sent the e-mail 17 that needed a lot of work and extremely over
18 personally. 18 priced. So that also added to that e-mail.
19 Q. Okay. We may just have to just come 19 Like there is nothing out there right now.
20 back to that one. 20 They took -- when they gave me that
21 A. Okay. 21 tour, they probably made it worse, because every
22 Q. The next -- the next thing you write 22 building they took me to I believe it was seven
23 is: At this time our building will not be in 23 or eight.
24 the market. What did you mean by that? 24 I mean, they did the whole circus act.
25 A. Well, we had gone through multiple 25 They took me to [inaudible]. It was the whole
Page 99 Page 101
1 months of receiving LOIs and offers and verbal 1 nine yards. And they just made it worse because
2 offers and conversations. And we were still 2 every building we walked into was worse, class
3 building out the building. And we just -- at 3 C, horrible, major upgrades needed. And one,
4 that time we wanted to complete our full 4 you had to put it on there. And I mean, it was
5 construction, have all the permits closed, of 5 horrible, horrible at that time.
6 everything we completed and go forward. 6 Q. So the -- the market -- it sounds like
7 And also the market was shifting by 7 you're saying the market was really bad for what
8 every day that went by. We weren't seeing any 8 it was you were looking for, right?
9 good properties that we were able to purchase to 9 A. Yes. From what we owned and what we
10 a realtor. So at that time, that time. 10 were looking for, there was nothing on the
11 I mean, at that time there was even 11 market at that time that made sense.
12 LOIs from Realtors and just -- they were coming 12 So since at that time, the buyer was
13 from anywhere. Of course, everybody is looking 13 not accepting the terms of us staying a year as
14 for a good deal. Everybody is looking for a 14 a lease back apart from the sales price else,
15 good deal. They wanted to undercut what the 15 apart from renting the house, we weren't going
16 market value is of a building, or commercial 16 to go forward with that offer, or any other
17 property, or residential home. 17 offer they brought that didn't meet the terms at
18 Q. So were you saying that you were going 18 that time.
19 to be taking -- you were not going to be selling 19 Q. And you said that Vince and Manny took
20 your building at that time to anyone? 20 you in -- in the car to look at a bunch of other
21 A. At that specific time that's exactly 21 properties.
22 what the e-mail said at that specific time, 22 A. In Coral Gables, yes. And we wanted
23 based on what the market was at that time. 23 to stay in Coral Gables because of the business
24 Q. Okay. 24 relationship we had with Vince. So we were
25 A. And we had had multiple conversations 25 actually looking for properties in Coral Gables,
26 (Pages 98 - 101)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 102 Page 104
1 which we ended up buying outside of Coral 1 most of the times that we went into these
2 Gables, a property that came online a couple of 2 properties, the owner wasn't even there.
3 months later, whatever it was, and we 3 Q. So Vince and Manny were trying really
4 immediately went and placed a contract that met 4 hard to find you a property, right?
5 the terms that the seller was looking for. And 5 A. Vince and Manny were doing everything
6 that's why it was accepted so fast. 6 possible that didn't make sense for us to accept
7 Q. So -- 7 the contract. Like I said, everything they
8 A. One of the terms the seller was 8 showed us in the market at that time in Coral
9 looking for they wanted this, this, this, this. 9 Gables was worthless. The terms that they
10 Perfect. Here's the contract. And that 10 presented to us were not the terms we wanted. I
11 building had just come on the market. If I 11 mean, they were not listening to us and what we
12 wouldn't have done that, I probably would have 12 were looking for.
13 received another 15 offers. 13 In every real estate transaction you
14 Q. Okay. 14 need to listen to the people you rep -- you're
15 A. But that didn't -- didn't exist at the 15 going to sell -- take a contract to. But if you
16 time when I sent that in. 16 don't --
17 Q. Okay. When you sent that e-mail to 17 Q. Well, I -- I'm -- I'm talking about
18 the property that you wanted to purchase? 18 when they drove you around Coral Gables to show
19 A. I'm sorry? What was the question? 19 you properties.
20 Q. You -- you were referring to a time 20 A. No. That was a circus act that they
21 when you purchased another property, right? 21 wanted to do to see if they can get us to
22 A. When we finally three months later 22 execute the contract that they had presented
23 found a property that we looked into that we 23 that didn't meet our terms.
24 purchased, yes, correct. 24 Look, because in this building I can
25 Q. And around when was that? 25 probably talk to the seller and we can do this.
Page 103 Page 105
1 A. We closed 2019. 1 And we could. No. That was -- that didn't make
2 Q. And what -- what property was that? 2 any sense what they were doing. Because it was
3 A. 68 Southwest 80th Street, South Miami. 3 nothing.
4 The one we talked about in the beginning of the 4 Q. Well, did you want -- were you
5 deposition. 5 looking -- weren't you looking for a property
6 Q. Going back to what you were telling me 6 that you could move into?
7 about Vince and Manny driving you around Coral 7 A. Yes. I've stated multiple times 100
8 Gables showing you a lot of properties -- 8 percent, yes. What were looking for.
9 A. Correct. 9 Q. Were they trying to help you find a
10 Q. -- how many days -- did -- did they 10 property that you could move into?
11 show you all the properties in one day or 11 A. They were looking for the contract
12 multiple days? 12 that they are presenting with the wrong terms
13 A. It was one day and most of them were 13 that we were not going to accept. That's what
14 not listed but they wanted to show me the 14 they were doing.
15 properties. 15 Q. I'm sorry, what?
16 And based on the budget we had at that 16 A. They were attempting to save the
17 time to see if it was fit to the sellers to 17 contract that they had presented with Elizabeth
18 become their representative, and the seller 18 with the wrong terms that we were not going to
19 would sell the property. 19 accept, apart from all the other lies and buyers
20 But I believe, no. I don't think any 20 that they brought us that didn't make any sense
21 of them were listed. I don't think even the 21 on the offers.
22 sellers were thinking about selling at that 22 Q. And they were trying to save the
23 time. It's just they had relationships. 23 contract by finding you another building that
24 When I say Manny could have -- mostly 24 you could move into, right?
25 Vince, had a relationship with the owners. And 25 A. They knew every building they took me
27 (Pages 102 - 105)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 106 Page 108
1 to, they knew it inside and out because they had 1 taken me to the properties that the sellers were
2 a relationship with the owner. I'm sure that's 2 modest in line with what we were looking for.
3 why they were just a walk-in. In fact, you know 3 And the property was in line with what we were
4 what, they took me to a building -- 4 looking for.
5 Q. Eddie, Eddie, Eddie, Eddie, listen to 5 Again, it was on a whim. This was
6 my question. Were they showing you properties 6 not --
7 in order to help you find a property that you 7 Q. Okay. So it sounds like -- it sounds
8 could move into? 8 like -- it sounds like you weren't very happy
9 A. I already said they were. They were 9 with Manny and Vince's performance?
10 trying to convince me on other properties, so I 10 A. I was not very happy with the
11 can execute the contract that was presented that 11 properties they showed me on that day. I was
12 didn't have the terms we wanted. I already said 12 not very happy with the contract they presented
13 yes. 13 and the multiple LOIs and conversations we had
14 Q. How many properties did they show you 14 that didn't meet our terms.
15 approximately? 15 But I'm not the type of person that is
16 A. I don't think -- I don't think it was 16 going to say, hey, you guys are wasting my time.
17 more than seven, six, five. 17 I don't want to deal with you anymore.
18 Q. Okay. So they drove you around Coral 18 No. I will send an e-mail. And I
19 Gables and -- and showed you seven different 19 will apologize. And that's who I am. I don't
20 properties that you could potentially move into? 20 think I'm better than anybody else. I don't --
21 A. It could be five, five, seven, 21 no. It's not my feed to cry, scream and yell.
22 whatever it was. Yeah. That's what they did. 22 I didn't do that. So, no, I wasn't happy with
23 Q. Okay. 23 them. But the way I was relaying this
24 A. And then, by the way, these were not 24 information to them was with the terms we wanted
25 appointments that they made beforehand. These 25 on the contract.
Page 107 Page 109
1 are not appointments that they made beforehand. 1 And every time we just walked into a
2 They didn't call the sellers or their 2 building that was unannounced, every time, I
3 representatives to say, hey, we're going to 3 said, by the way, this property, look at how
4 bring somebody so we can show your property. 4 much money you have to put into this property.
5 They were just walking into these 5 It doesn't even meet what we talked about.
6 properties. Sometimes the people there didn't 6 Yeah.
7 even know why they were there. And they had to 7 I wasn't happy. But I wasn't going to
8 explain. It wasn't like they had this prepared 8 be rude to them. I wouldn't be rude to anybody.
9 or did any phone calls to prepare this. It was 9 That's not me.
10 just a whim. Hey, let's do this. Let's see 10 Q. So the properties that they showed
11 what happens. There was no preparation, 11 you, the five or seven properties, none of them
12 nothing. 12 were acceptable for you in your opinion to move
13 Q. Well, it wasn't a whim. They were 13 into, right?
14 trying to help you buying the property that you 14 A. Some were not acceptable. And if they
15 could move into so the contract could work out, 15 would have done their homework, they wouldn't
16 right? 16 have taken me to those properties. If they
17 A. If they -- if they were serious about 17 would have called the sellers and gone to visit
18 showing us another property, they would have -- 18 the property first, they wouldn't have -- they
19 they would have called the sellers, the 19 wouldn't have taken me to that property and
20 representatives. They would have asked them if 20 wasted my time.
21 they're interested in selling. They didn't even 21 Q. Okay. So you feel like Manny and
22 know that. 22 Vince wasted your time?
23 They would have asked them what were 23 A. I feel like that day, that day, when
24 the -- what were the terms and sales price. 24 they came to the office and put me in the car
25 They had no idea. And then they would have 25 and drove me around without even preparing the
28 (Pages 106 - 109)
Veritext Legal Solutions
800-726-7007 305-376-8800
Page 110 Page 112
1 sellers that we were coming, they wouldn't have 1 Q. Why did they take you to a bunch of
2 taken us to the properties that we -- based on 2 properties that day?
3 the budget we were looking for, yes, of course, 3 A. I wasn't part of that conversation.
4 they were wasting my time. But again, I wasn't 4 What they were trying, if they told me --
5 going to be rude. I just told them, none of 5 Q. Why did they drive you around Coral
6 these properties meet the criterias and the 6 Gables?
7 budget we're looking for. 7 A. Let me finish. I wasn't part of the
8 Q. Okay. 8 conversation. What they told me was they wanted
9 MS. FISHFELD: I think that now is 9 to show me possible properties that we could
10 good time for a short break. 10 maybe buy in the future.
11 THE WITNESS: Sure. 11 Q. And they wanted to show you properties
12 MS. DE ALEJO: Okay. 12 that you could buy in the future because they
13 MS. FISHFELD: So let's take about 10 13 wanted to close this deal with Alex Alvarez,
14 minutes or so. 14 right?
15 THE WITNESS: Whatever you guys want. 15 A. I imagine that's what it was.
16 MS. DE ALEJO: Okay. Okay. 16 Q. Okay. And they were trying so hard to
17 (Recess.) 17 close this deal with Alex Alvarez so that they
18 Q. Okay. Just a couple of final 18 would then earn a commission, right?
19 questions about the day that Manny and Vince 19 A. Okay. Your words of trying so hard
20 drove you around looking at properties. When 20 are not my words. Because if I'm trying hard to
21 was that approximately? 21 get a deal done, if I want to take up sites as a
22 A. It was a couple of days before 22 commercial Realtor and take them to go see
23 June 20th. 23 properties, I'm going to be ready.
24 Q. Okay. And, I know you -- you said 24 And I would have spoken if it's listed
25 some things about how they, you know, sort of 25 to the listing agent or if it's off market where
Page 111 Page 113
1 had done more homework and -- and things like 1 they have an agreement with -- in writing with
2 this. But is it your understanding that Manny 2 the seller, were in their terms.
3 and Vince were showing you all of these 3 No. They weren't trying hard. This
4 properties in an effort to try to find you a 4 was something on a whim that they must have come
5 property that would be satisfactory for you? 5 up with the night before, Hey, why don't we take
6 A. So that day, they called me on that 6 Eddie. Take him in a car and drive him around
7 day and they asked me if I was available. And I 7 Coral Gables to go -- to show him a couple. No.
8 believe had something planned, but I told them I 8 There -- there was no preparation.
9 moved my calendar and I will go ahead with you 9 Q. So my question is: Why, why, why did
10 guys. 10 they do that is my question.
11 I felt I was going to view properties 11 A. Because they wanted to close not only
12 that they had off market listing agreements and 12 that contract but all the LOIs and contracts
13 that they knew what the seller's terms were. 13 that they'd brought us in conversations that we
14 Q. But this is not -- this is not 14 had that didn't meet our terms.
15 answering my -- my question. 15 I mean, it wasn't -- we had a contract
16 A. I am answering, actually. What I 16 with them. It was LOIs. The properties they
17 later realized is that, A, they knew nothing 17 were showing me about the 5.8 that was an LOI,
18 about the property, and, B, they had nothing 18 for another buyer. Remember when we were
19 from the seller. 19 talking about. That was another buyer. Another
20 So I was disappointed. I was 20 LOI.
21 disappointed that they took their time and my 21 Q. They -- they wanted to make a
22 time to take me to properties that didn't even 22 commission, right?
23 meet the criteria that we were looking for. I 23 MS. DE ALEJO: Object to form.
24 was disappointed, of course. 100 percent. 24 A. Yes. I mean, if that's what -- yeah.
25 There -- there was no preparation for that. 25 I guess, that's what they do.