Comparative Media Systems

Name

Instructor

Institution

Course

Date
 Comparative Media Systems

Introduction.

This paper aims to address Comparative Media systems. This will be done by defining

Comparative Media Systems, mentioning and explaining the dimensions of Comparative Media

systems that are there, and giving examples. First, Comparative media systems can be defined as

the comparative analysis of media structures, functions, regulations, and influences across

different countries or regions. The goal of this field of study is to comprehend the connections

between media systems and societal dynamics by comparing and contrasting how media

functions in various cultural, political, economic, and technological situations.

In their book, "Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics," Hallin, D.

C., & Mancini, P. (2004) suggest the following three ideal-typical patterns of media and politics:

the liberal model, the North/Central European or democratic corporatist model, and the

Mediterranean or polarized pluralist model. Their paradigm has been widely applied to the

analysis and comparison of media systems in many nations and areas. Weischenberg, S. (2009)

in his book "Global Journalism: Topical Issues and Media Systems," gives insightful studies of

media structures, functions, and influences across many locations, providing insights into

comparative media systems from European and worldwide perspectives. Furthermore, in the

Chapter titled "Comparative Media Systems: European and Global Perspectives," Weischenberg

provides a thorough analysis of the intricacies of media systems in various political, social, and

cultural situations. He looks at the ways that media organizations function under various social

structures, emphasizing the differences in media ownership, content, regulation, and audience

participation.
 Thus, his study advances our understanding of how media shapes public discourse, political

engagement, and cultural identity in the globalized world of today by comparing media systems

across geographical boundaries.

Many scholars have written and done scholarly works on Comparative Media Systems.

Furthermore, researchers have come up with the dimensions for comparisons and thus propose

four major dimensions of comparing media systems in Western Europe and North America. To

comprehend the similarities and contrasts in media structures, practices, and impacts across these

regions, these dimensions are frequently studied in academic research. The first one of these

dimensions is Media ownership. The term "media ownership" describes how people, businesses,

or the government control and concentrate their media outlets (Noam, 2009). It includes the

ownership dynamics and structures found in the print, broadcast, and digital media industries,

and assessing editorial independence, diversity of views, and media pluralism within a particular

media system requires an understanding of media ownership.

For example, in countries with concentrated media ownership, there may be concerns about

the influence of powerful owners on editorial decision-making and the diversity of viewpoints

represented in the media (Noam, 2009). Comparative studies also show how various regulatory

frameworks influence the ownership and dynamics of media in different geographical areas. For

example, regulatory frameworks in European nations frequently work to prevent undue media

ownership concentration and to encourage media plurality (Hallin & Mancini, 2004). In contrast,

North America's regulatory framework, especially that of the United States, has historically been

laxer, which has increased the concentration of media ownership at higher levels (Noam, 2009).

For example, media ownership trends in Africa, especially in Kenya, show a combination of

privately held, state-owned, and politically associated media institutions. Media ownership in
Kenya has traditionally been characterized by a concentration of ownership among a small

number of powerful individuals or families (Mwesige, 2017). Businesses with substantial

holdings in a variety of media industries, including radio, television, and newspapers, like Nation

Media Group and Royal Media Services, have a big impact on the media landscape (Mwesige,

2017). Furthermore, regulatory frameworks are important in determining the dynamics of media

ownership in Africa. To encourage diversity and openness in media ownership, the

Communication Authority of Kenya (CA) is responsible for managing media regulation and

licensing in Kenya (Mwesige, 2017). Hence, assessing the role of media in democracy, public

debate, and social development requires an understanding of the complexity of media ownership

in Kenya and other African nations within the framework of comparative media systems

(Mwesige, 2017; Noam, 2009).

Another dimension that is critical in understanding Comparative Media systems is Media

Content relayed through Media. Media content refers to the various forms of information, news,

entertainment, and cultural productions disseminated by media outlets (McQuail, 2010). This

includes the storytelling strategies, editorial judgments, and programming selections made by

media companies for print, television, and internet media, among other platforms. Researchers

who study Comparative Media systems frequently look at how variations in journalistic

standards, media ownership structures, and regulatory frameworks reflect variances in media

content across various nations or regions. Comparative studies could, for instance, look at how

news and entertainment are balanced, how different voices and viewpoints are represented, and

how social and political topics are presented in media coverage. (Quail, 2010).

For example, Comparative studies of media content are commonly conducted in Western

Europe to evaluate how political news is represented and how important problems are framed in
various nations. For instance, to learn how European media outlets prioritize and interpret

political developments, scholars can look at how elections and other political events are covered

(Hallin & Mancini, 2004). Furthermore, the Comparative Media systems study in the United

States frequently looks at how minority voices and cultural diversity are portrayed in media

material. Researchers examine the disparities in media framing and storytelling techniques as

they relate to issues of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation (Entman & Rojecki, 2000).

Studies that compare different contexts have revealed differences in how minority groups

are portrayed and how rarely their viewpoints are featured in mainstream media. Researchers can

identify systemic biases and prejudices that influence public perceptions and fuel social

inequality by examining media content (Entman & Rojecki, 2000). In the context of Africa,

media coverage of a wide range of subjects and viewpoints, such as political news, social issues,

and cultural events, is common, especially in Kenya yet questions have been raised about the

veracity and quality of media reports, with certain sources being charged with prejudice,

sensationalism, and a lack of professionalism (Mwesige, 2017).

Regulatory frameworks also affect media content by pushing particular editorial standards or

placing limitations on particular kinds of content. Guidelines for decency, accuracy, and

impartiality in media material are, for example, part of Kenya's Communication Authority of

Kenya (CA) media regulation (Mwesige, 2017). In Kenya, media content analysis also looks at

how social issues like poverty, education, healthcare, and human rights are portrayed.

Researchers look at how various media outlets cover these topics, focusing on how stories are

framed, how multiple viewpoints are included, and how impacted communities are portrayed

(Mutunga, 2016). Therefore, researchers can better understand how the media addresses social

concerns, increases public awareness, and influences public discourse and policies by conducting
comparative studies of media content in Kenya. They also highlighted the discrepancies in how

the media covers stories and the difficulties in guaranteeing fair and impartial reporting.

Another dimension critical to understanding Comparative Media Systems is Media

Regulation. According to Thusu, 2013, Media regulation is the set of rules, policies, and laws

that govern the media industry, including print, broadcast, and digital media. It covers a wide

range of topics, including licensing, rules for advertising, ownership and content regulation, and

the preservation of journalistic freedom (Noam, 2016). In Europe for example, a combination of

organizations like the European Union (EU) and state laws and regulations affect media

Regulation (Noam, 2016). The media policies of all of the EU's member states are greatly

influenced by the EU. As an illustration, the EU's Audiovisual Media Services Directive

(AVMSD) governs broadcasting and on-demand video services, making sure they follow

uniform guidelines for advertising, content, and minor protection (European Parliament, 2010).

In the United States of America, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the

Communications Act of 1934, which has been modified throughout time to account for shifting

media environments, are two federal institutions and laws that oversee Media Regulation. In

Kenya, media regulation is overseen by the Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK), which

was established under the Kenya Information and Communications Act (CCK, 1998) (Ottichilo,

2020).

The Communication Authority of Kenya controls postal, telecommunication, and broadcasting

services. However, given instances of government meddling and limitations on press freedom,

there have been doubts over the independence of media regulation in Kenya (Freedom House,

2020).
 The last dimension that influences Comparative Media systems is the Media's role in society.

The media plays a crucial role in society by acting as a bridge between information sources and

the public, facilitating the flow of news, ideas, and opinions. It serves as a watchdog by holding

governments and institutions accountable, providing a platform for diverse voices, fostering

public debate, and shaping public opinion (Chadwick, 2017). Media systems in Europe vary

greatly amongst nations, reflecting a range of political, linguistic, and cultural circumstances.

Public service broadcasting has a long history in many European nations, marked by a dedication

to offering educational, culturally diverse, and instructive content (Hallin & Mancini, 2004).

Another example is that the media landscape in the United States is distinguished by a

competitive and diverse market that includes a range of commercial, alternative, and public

media sources (McChesney & Nichols, 2010). In the USA, the media's functions include

disseminating news, entertaining people, and serving as a forum for public conversation.

Ongoing discussions center on issues such as commercialization, media ownership consolidation,

and the effects of digital technologies on democratic communication and media plurality

(Pickard, 2016). In Kenya, the media plays a critical role in advancing democratic norms,

accountability, and transparency. A variety of public, private, and community-based media

outlets make up the media landscape with each having its special contributions and difficulties

(Ottichilo, 2020). The media's capacity to carry out its democratic duties has also been hampered

by instances of censorship, intimidation, and legal constraints, raising questions regarding media

independence and freedom (Freedom House, 2020).

This paper has aimed to address Comparative Media Systems and especially in Europe, the

United States of America, and Kenya. Comparative media systems therefore offer insightful
information about the variety of media roles, structures, and influences in various geographical

areas.
 References

Curran, J., & Gurevitch, M. (Eds.). (2005). Mass media and society (5th ed.). Hodder Arnold.

Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (2000). The black image in the white mind: Media and race in

America. University of Chicago Press.

European Parliament. (2010). Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the

Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law,

regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of

audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). Official Journal of

the European Union.

European Parliament. (2010). Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD). Retrieved from

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?

uri=OJ:L:2010:095:0001:0024:EN:PDF

Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (Eds.). (2016). Comparative political communication research: Theories,

methods, and findings (Communication, Society and Politics). Oxford University Press.

Freedom House. (2020). Freedom in the World 2020: Kenya. Retrieved from

https://freedomhouse.org/country/kenya/freedom-world/2020

Federal Communications Commission. (n.d.). About the FCC. Retrieved from

https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc

Freedom House. (2020). Kenya country report. Retrieved from

https://freedomhouse.org/country/kenya/freedom-world/2020

Federal Communications Commission. (n.d.). About the FCC. Retrieved from

https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and

politics. Cambridge University Press

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's mass communication theory. Sage Publications.

Mutunga, W. (2016). Media and the judiciary in Kenya: A critical appraisal. In T. N. Okurut et

al. (Eds.), Communication, governance, and sustainable development in Africa: Critical

perspectives and approaches (pp. 203-218). Springer

Mwesige, P. G. (2017). Media Ownership and Concentration in Kenya. In J. C. Ogbondah (Ed.),

Media in Africa and Africa in the Media: A Handbook on Media Education and Training

in Africa (pp. 197-206). African Council for Communication Education.

Noam, E. M. (2009). Media ownership and concentration in America. Oxford University Press.

Noam, E. M. (2016). Media ownership and regulation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International

encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 15, pp. 109-113). Elsevier.

Noam, E. M. (2016). Who owns the world's media? Media concentration and ownership around

the world. Oxford University Press.

Thussu, D. K. (2013). Media and communication regulation: Global governance and the public

interest. SAGE Publications.

Ottichilo, L. (2020). Communications Authority of Kenya: An overview of the regulatory

framework and its effectiveness. Journal of African Media Studies, 12(3), 345-361.

Ottichilo, J. (2020). The role of Communications Authority of Kenya (CAK) in regulating the

media sector. Journal of Communication Regulation, 45(3), 78-91.

Weischenberg, S. (2009). Comparative media systems: European and global perspectives. In A.

S. de Beer, & J. Merrill (Eds.), Global journalism: Topical issues and media systems (pp.

165-178). Pearson Education.