Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finch, R.G. ‘Atlakvioa, Atlamal, and Volsunga saga: A study in Combination and
Integration’ in Specvlvm Norroenvm: Norse Studies in Memory of Gabriel Turville-Petre,
(123-38)
Gunnel, Terry and Lassen, Annette, The Nordic Apocalypse: Approaches to Voluspa and
Nordic Days of Judgement
The Early Scholarly Reception of Voluspa from Snorri Sturluson to Arni Magnusson (3)
Snorri’s Edda
Handbook on poetry 1220
o Including Gylfaginning = based on 6/7 of the Eddic poems
Considered Voluspa the most important source of knowledge regarding ancient
times
o Because of the chronological scope of the poem and its cosmic time span (3)
Voluspa = very obscure at moments
Mundal
o Says Snorri omits material he did not understand
o Also that he remoes female figures (e.g., the giantresses)
o Snorri intended to imitate Christian myth
Lack of interest in female deities in Snorri’s Edda
Gylfaginning = frame narrative (5)
o How the Swedish king Gylfi visits the ‘Asians’ to learn about their great
success
o Three ‘Asians’ tell Gylfi about their gofs, the Aesir = untrustworthy fables
o Deceive Gylfi who retells stories like perverted evangelist
Snorri speaks behind mask of Har = not his voice, cannot give insight into his own
belief (6)
Stephan Stephanius
Realised the importance of the Old Icelandic texts as comparative sources (12)
Arni Magnusson
Argues that the authors of the poems did not believe that the poems originated with
the Aesir (19)
o Even though they composed them as if they were direct speech of the Aesir
Heathen gods speak in first person
Suggests that the poems composed in first person are examples of prosop<op>oeia
(personification)
The poems were composed by heather worshippers in honour of their gods and not
by the gods – or the Asian – themselves
Eddic poems actually date from different periods
Concluding remarks
Source criticism only began with the work of Arni Magnusson
Search for parallels to Nordic mythology and religious practices in the folklore of the
local Germanic regions
Jacob Grimm (19)
o Convinced that texts with explicit Christian ideology represented a phase in
which the originally ‘pure’ antiquity of the North had been ‘polluted’ by
foreign ideas
Volupsa and Time (25)
The concept of time is relevant to all studies of Voluspa
o Past, present, and future = a constitutive element of the poem as a narrative
The poem is an entity existing in time
o Some idea about its place in history is a precondiction of any attempt at its
interpretation
However, no fixed point in time determined
o Instead the poem can be compared with an organism developing throughout
time
Such a story challenges the imagination: it forces us to fill the many gaps in the
picture… (26)
o Possible to be simply overwhelmed, filled with awe and ‘fear and pity’
(Aristotle)
Christian audiences in 13th century
o Allegorical interpretations
Is it old enough for a pre-Christian or non-Christian interpretation to exist?
o Formed by a heathen ideology
o The speaker, a female, presents her credentials and declares that what she
remembers stretches far back (29)
o Spoken in present tense
o But address must have been made at moment in past
o ‘Ar var alda’ (young were the years) = in Eddic poetry Ar Var is formula which
refers to a distant past and ar is connected with what in Latin is said to
happen in illo tempore
The Volva
o Occasionally address the audience directly and refers to herself
o E.g., R29-30 = mentions a meeting with Odin that took place In her past
Alternation in narrative between past tense and references to the present
monologue
Ragnarok is an event lying in the future, but the poem gives the impression that it is
imminent (31)
Voluspa in time
Contains a powerful expression of ideas and emotions derived from pre-Christian
Northern religion (34)
o Not an attempt to create any kind of heathen theology
o Not a theoretical or discursive poem, not trying to preach anything
At most it reflects a fear that may be of a religious nature and some kind of hope
that destruction will not be final
Affinity with Christian thought?
o A contemplation of a beginning and a terrifying end of the world
o Historical attitude to existence
Voluspa poet’s interpretation of world history = deep tragic feeling
What happens after Ragnarok?
o Second generation of gods return to a rejuvenated physical world
o They do not come to judge but to resume innocent games of their
forefathers
Strophe R61 = description of a Christian paradise?
o No reason to believe that ‘dyggvar drottir’ (good people) = refers to reborn
individuals rather than to a new and virtuous race of humankind
o ‘um aldrdaga’ does not mean ‘for eternity’ but simply ‘during a lifetime’
The Christian parallel is easily establish by Christians (35)
o But wouldn’t have any such connotations in the minds of the original
audience of the poet?
Final section reflects a mixture of old and new?
o Pagan ideas intermingled with undigested fragments picked up from the
sermons of missionaries
Idea of ragnarok older than advent of Christianity in Scandiavia?
Conclusion
How time functions in Voluspa and how the interpretation of the poem is dependent
on the time in which it is being interpreted (41)
Poem composed around or before 1000
Has kept is main structure but over time in oral tradition has attracted material of
Christian origin inviting a more Christian interpretation
“we can never break the ties to our own time”
o Poem will always be interpreted from own standpoint
Surtr
Strophe 52 = pictures the world’s destruction through fire
o Central strophe in the ragnarok sequence of events
o Describes how Surtr advances and impending encounter with Freyr – the
fertility god of beast and soil
Surtr as the gods’ ultimate antagonist
o Prominent role in bringing about world cataclysm
Dronke = “a folk-legendary fire-demon and giant” (120)
Palsson = “a fire giant”
He became associated with volcanic phenomena in medieval Iceland?
Surtalogi (‘flame of Surtr’) (121)
Idea of ‘black fire’ occurs with some frequency in medieval Christian speculations
about the afterlife (122)
The Aesir
Odinn = ‘the furious one’
o Leader of the gods/Aesir
o One-eyed, beared, old
o Sometimes called the ‘All-father’
o Attribute = spear called Gungir
o War-god but unlike Freyr, he’s more of a strategist than a fighter e.g.,
teaching his chosen heroes effective battle formations
o Stirs conflict to see who is worthy to enter his great hall, Valhalla and join the
Einherjar, the warriors who will fight with the gods at ragnarok
o Patron of Kings
Baldr
o Best and brightest of the gods; radiates light
o Blond eyelashes
o Dies young, will return after ragnarok
o Hall: Breioablikr
o Married to Nanna, who goes to Hell with him
Loki
o Son of a goddess and a giant
o Good-looking but nasty in tempermanet and variable in behaviour
o Exceptionally cunning
o Sexuality is polymorphous
o Married to Sgyn = has two sons (Nari and Narfi)
o Father of cosmic monsters
Valkyries = supernatural women who dwell in Valholl
o ‘Choosers of the Slain’
o Brynhildr punished for disobeying orders and giving victory to
younger/handsomer man
Odinn as patron
Heroic literature composed for the social elite = Odin figures in it largely as the
ancestor of Kings and the patron of heroes