Case 1

When making moral choices for a patient who is near death, Dr. Patel must strike a balance
between beneficence and autonomy. While beneficence is concerned with advancing the patient’s
well-being, autonomy respects the patient’s right to decline treatment due to personal beliefs. By
being open with communication, giving thorough information, looking into alternate treatments,
consulting an ethics committee, and regularly reevaluating the situation, Dr. Patel can strike this
balance. The suggested course of action ought to take the patient’s well-being into account and
give priority to their autonomy.

Case 2

In the case of child marriage, there are many conflicting cultural traditions and universal human
rights principles. Communities can work through this issue by enlisting the help of international
organizations, encouraging alternative rites of passage, empowering women and girls, enacting
legislative changes, and promoting education. Maintaining human rights and valuing cultural
diversity calls for cooperation.

Case 3

Pharmaceutical companies must weigh consumer safety against profit maximization, a morally
difficult balance to strike when it comes to hidden drug side effects. Companies should place a
high priority on accountability, ethical marketing, strict testing, transparency, and regulatory
compliance in order to encourage ethical decision-making. By putting these tactics into practice,
one can protect patient safety, respect moral principles, and preserve the standing of the industry.