Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part I
Author(s): Schuyler Cammann
Source: History of Religions , Feb., 1969, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Feb., 1969), pp. 181-209
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to History of Religions
SQUARES
PART I
they did not openly express-certain basic ideas from the philoso-
phies or religions of the respective peoples who made them.
Altogether, it seemed obvious that the preference for certain types
of magic squares in different cultures must have arisen because
these particular types more effectively symbolized the ideas and
beliefs of the people who made them.
This is not surprising, because-although it is still fashionable in
some academic circles to speak of a common philosophical tradition
in olden times, "The Perennial Philosophy," implying that the
same ideas and symbols pertained everywhere in the Ancient and
Medieval worlds, with only slight regional variations in their
expression-actually, ideas and symbols differed widely, until
modern times. A given symbol could mean quite different things
in separate nations, or even at different times within the same
culture. This is obvious when one traces the progress and decline
of the magic square of three in China. Therefore, it is futile to try
to transfer unchanged the Chinese symbological interpretations
of their own magic squares to the squares of other people in other
civilizations; just as the views of the "outside nations" concerning
their own magic squares cannot validly be read back to interpret
the squares in China. Almost the only thing that carried over from
one nation to another was the notion that a magic square was a
miniature diagram of the Earth or of the Universe; the nature of
the Universe, and what took place within it, was very differently
explained in each major culture.
1 9
741 4 2 4 2 4 9 2
7 5 3 3 5 7
852 8 6 8 6 357
9 6 3 9 1 8 1 6
a. b. c. d.
FIG. 1.-How the Chinese made the Lo-Shu: (a) the natural square of three
(Chinese style); (d) the magic square of three.
lack the section on magic squares. However, these squares have been republished
by Li Yen in the various editions of his book called Chung-suan-shih lun-ts'ung.
(My references here are to the pai-hua edition of 1934.) This method for making
the magic square of three is found in the latter, on p. 178. Incidentally, it should
be noted here that the Old Chinese magic squares had each number enclosed in a
small circle, rather than having a square with cells.
10 See Cammann, "Old Chinese Magic Squares" (n. 4 above), Figs. 3, 4, 7, and
9.
11 Ibid., Figs. 6 and 8.
12 Several examples of the Islamic squares made by combining these two
Chinese techniques are shown in a Persian manuscript in the British Museum:
Add. 7713, p. 119b, ff. For more about this MS, see n. 35 below.
187
second type, which were also "associated." That is, every pair of
numbers equidistant from the center, on a line running through
the middle number, is "complementary"; the sum of each pair is
always double the middle number.-The same phenomenon is
present in the magic square of three, but it seems more spectacular
in the larger squares.
Probably the most amibitious use of the Lo-Shu pattern in
China appeared in the Old Chinese magic square of nine. First
they made a natural square of nine, writing the numbers from
1 to 81 in nine columns; then they took each horizontal row and
arranged its numbers in the Lo-Shu pattern, to make a magic
square of the third order; and finally they arranged these nine
small squares in the Lo-Shu pattern to make a kind of "Giant
Lo-Shu."13 Later, Muslim scholars did a kind of variation on
this, by making a natural square in the same way, then taking the
columns, instead of the rows, to make the small squares of the
third order, later arranging these in a giant Lo-Shu pattern.
However, this was somewhat less effective, as the mode of con-
struction was more immediately obvious.
Even more ingenious was the Old Chinese application of the
Lo-Shu pattern to make magic squares of six.14 Magic squares of
even numbers cannot be made in the same way as those for the odd
numbers. They fall into two groups, depending on whether the
base number is "singly even"-divisible only by 2-as 6, 10, 14,
etc., or "doubly even"-divisible by 4 (or 2 twice)-as 4, 8, 12,
etc. The "singly even" squares present special problems, and they
have always been considered most difficult to construct. Paradoxi-
cally, the Chinese managed to conquer this major difficulty with
the magic square of six, by once more calling upon the Lo-Shu, in
a typically Chinese mode of construction which we never find
repeated elsewhere; yet they were never very successful in coping
with the other even numbers, even the relatively easy, doubly
even ones. This is because they were so overly dependent upon the
Lo-Shu that in cases where they could not apply it they felt quite
lost. They managed to achieve rather primitive magic squares of
four and eight; but for a more sophisticated square of eight, and
one of ten, they had to borrow from elsewhere,15 as we shall see.
13 Cammann, "Old Chinese Magic Squares" (n. 4 above), Figs. 10 and 11.
14 Ibid., Figs. 14, 15, and 16.
15 In ibid., pp. 44-45 and 46-47, I assumed that Yang Hui's first magic square
of eight and his magic square of ten were both Chinese. I have since discovered
that I was wrong; neither was of Chinese construction and they were undoubtedly
borrowed from another land, probably India, as I shall explain in Part II.
188
20 The abjad system was a way of using Arabic letters with numerical values
instead of numbers, as was done before the introduction of numerals from India.
Since these letters were arranged in an archaic sequence, following the order of
the Hebrew alphabet, the first four were alef, bd, jZm and ddl, so the initials of
these names for the Arabic letters were taken to make the-otherwise meaning-
less-name abjad. (Actually abjad is the first of a series of nonsensical words which
comprise all the letter numbers, to aid in remembering them.)
21 For details about this Brotherhood, see George Sarton, Introduction to the
History of Science, I (Baltimore, 1927), pp. 660-61. Their encyclopedia was
reprinted in Cairo in 1928 from a manuscript in that city, and I have used this
edition for its magic squares. I have examined many other manuscripts of this
book in libraries in the United States and in Europe, but this is the only one I
have seen that has the higher squares above six (although the others discuss
them without picturing them). These last three squares are so very primitive
that they match the rest, and there seems no reason to suspect that they are not
all very early, probably the original set from the ninth century.
The same set, from the same source, has already been published by Hermelink,
in "Die altesten magischen Quadrate h6herer Ordnung und ihre Bildungsweise,"
Sudhoffs Archiv, XLII (1958), 199-217. Since the squares in this Cairo edition
are horribly garbled, some years ago I worked for many weeks to resolve the
garbles and reconstruct the original squares. I had finally completed this task,
and was about to publish my findings, when I came upon this article by Dr.
Hermelink. Our reconstructions of the squares were identical; but I cannot agree
with some of his interpretations and conclusions.
22 Even in forming the natural squares, there were different procedures in the
various cultures, due to differences in habits of writing. In China, natural squares
were constructed in vertical columns beginning at the upper right; in the Islamic
world, they were made in horizontal rows beginning at the upper right; in India,
horizontal rows beginning at the upper left.
190
21 3 4 12 25
4 14 15 1
2 7 6 4 14 15 15 17 6 19 8
9 7 6 12
9 5 1 9 7 6 12 10 24 132 16
4 3 8 5 11 10 8 18 7 20 9 11
a. 16 2 3 13
b. 1 14 22 23 5
11 22 32 5 23 18 47 11 8 9 6 45 49
253016
25 16 7 13 7
2030 13 20 4 37 20 17 16 35 46
27 6 27
35 36 6 35 36 4 2 18 26 21 28 32 48
4 3
10 31 10 31341
1 2 33 2 33 34 43 19 27 25 23 31 7
14 19 8 29 2615 383622292414 12
24 17 28 9 12 21 40 15 30 33 34 13 10
?a* 'b. 1 39 42 41 44 5 3
FIG. 3.-Early Islamic magic squares of six and seven. From the Rasa'il o
Ikhwan as-Saffa.
23 Hermelink, op. cit. (n. 21 above), pp. 210-11. As stated in the text above, it
seems most unlikely that the square of four which appears at the core of the new
square, after one reassembles this early Islamic square of six, actually served as
the basis for constructing the latter, as Hermelink implied. If it had, the square
illustrated in Fig. 7, in the text above, would have served as the pattern, but the
numbering would have begun at the upper left, in the Indian style, and the short
sequences would have used odd and even numbers alternately: 1, 3, 5, 7; 2, 4, 6,
8; etc. One would not expect to find that degree of sophistication, either in India
or in the Islamic areas, at that early date (ninth century A.D.). On the contrary,
one finds later Islamic magic squares of six made exactly the same way as this
early one (see ref. in n. 26 below), so there seems no reason to doubt that the
Brothers' magic square of six was made just the way it appears, with no question
of splitting and reassembling.
24 See previous note.
25 The North Indian Muslims, however, being under strong cultural influence
from Persia, used bordered squares. The Qanoon-e-Islam (n. 1 above) shows
bordered squares of six and ten, for example, although its magic square of six is
done in a different technique.
26 S;fif Kemal al-Tustari, in his book on magic squares entitled Ghayat al-Murdd,
written in 1448, illustrates a magic square of six made in this same technique, and
192
it seems quite possible that someone in the Islamic world did try
the experiment of splitting up this earliest Islamic square of six-
or one like it-and then, upon discovering that its center was a
magic square of four, he might have learned how to make bordered
squares for "singly-even" numbers around a magic square of four
as a core; for this technique seems to have been a distinct Islamic
contribution. We shall discuss its further development later.
In most manuscripts of the Rasd'il the above four squares are
the only ones illustrated,27 but all the manuscripts describe three
more squares, and at least one pictures the latter.28 Two of these
are so very primitive that they suggest tentative experiments
with a new technique, although one of them shows some Chinese
influence, while the third is in purely Chinese style. In other words,
their form seems quite consistent with the four more familiar
ones, and there seems no reason to question the assumption that
all seven must originally have belonged together in one group, at
the earliest stage in the development of magic squares in the Near
East.
For the square of eight, the Arab or Persian maker tried to
apply the same principles that had been used in doing the magic
square of six, by first concentrating on filling the central cross
(two middle columns and two middle rows), then the diagonals
and finally filling in the rest. Apparently, he did not yet realize
that there was a radical distinction between "singly-even" and
"doubly-even" numbers which necessitated separate techniques
for making magic squares with them; so it did not work at al
well. The result once again shows a groping attempt to achieve
balance without having any adequate system, and the initial
confusion is compounded in the published example by an excessive
number of garbles.
The magic square of nine is similarly inept. Here, the maker
first attempted to arrange the numbers on a Lo-Shu framework or
skeleton, in the familiar Chinese style, but he failed; finally he had
in this case it does not form a bordered square when its quarters are exchanged
The manuscript of this book, in the Columbia University Library, has unnumbere
pages, making precise citation impossible.
27 A typical manuscript of the Rasd'il is one in the Bibliotheque Nationale in
Paris (Ms. arabe 2304). A partial translation of this by F. Dieterici, in Die Pro-
paedeutik der Araber in zehnte Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1865), contains the magic
squares of three, four, five, and six, and merely the empty frames for the las
three; probably the copyist found them too confusing, or too garbled, to bothe
with. (Incidentally, in Dieterici's time, this Paris MS had another number:
1005.)
28 The MS which served as the basis for the Cairo edition of 1928, referred to
in n. 21 above.
193
to break this pattern in order to make the square come out right.
He did not even succeed in making it associated. Once again, this
was horribly garbled in transmission.
By contrast, the Brothers' magic square of seven was a very
nice one. Here, the maker took the nine middle numbers of the
sequence from 1 to 49-namely, 21 to 29-and arranged these in
an inverted Lo-Shu pattern to form a central core. Then he took
the next nine complementary pairs and set them opposite each
other to make a border around the core. Finally, he used the
twelve remaining complementary pairs to make an outer border
around the whole. These were so carefully arranged that if the
outer border is removed, the remaining square is still magic, and if
the inner border is taken off, there still remains the magic square
of the third order which formed the core. Thus, he produced a
"concentric, bordered magic square."
While a bordered square built around a Lo-Shu core was an Old
Chinese device, this is the earliest published example of it, and
the first concentric one yet known.29 In Europe the bordered
squares are usually said to have been invented by Michael Stifel,
the friend and contemporary of Luther and Melanchthon, who
presented some of these in his Arithmetica integra, printed in
1544.30 In fact they are still known in Germany as "Stifel squares"
(Stifelsche Quadrate), although we now see that they were known
hundreds of years before his time, and they were probably trans-
mitted to Europe from the Islamic world, though the links are not
yet all complete.
The fact that the magic squares in this early set presented by
the Brothers of Purity were each constructed on a rather different
system should not be taken as a demonstration of versatility. It
simply shows that the art of making magic squares was still so
new and unfamiliar to the Islamic scholars that they did not know
of any single system for making successive odd-number magic
squares; nor did they yet know that the method used in making
their square of four could also be applied for making squares of
29 The Chinese bordered magic square of seven pictured by Yang Hui had a
more cleverly constructed core, but it was not a concentric square.
30 Published in Nuremburg. On pp. 25-26a, Stifel publishes several examples
which follow the one shown here (in Fig. 3b above) in having its numbering
beginning in the outermost frame and working in to the core and out again.
Wilhelm Ahrens, in "Nochmal die magischen Quadrate," Der Islam, XIV (1925),
109, assumes that bordered magic squares were an Islamic invention. It would
seem, however, that the earliest bordered squares for odd numbers were Chinese,
while those for even numbers were probably invented by the Muslims. However,
there is no question that both types were transmitted to Europe from the Islamic
world.
194
eight and other doubly even numbers. At this early stage, the
construction of magic squares was still a most difficult and time-
consuming task, and the few who were able to do this at all must
have seemed to others of that time to be magicians indeed.
On the other hand, these men of the Middle East did not feel
themselves bound to any one tradition, as the Chinese had been in
their single-minded devotion to the Lo-Shu; because for them the
magic square of three did not carry such a burden of specific
symbols. They were also unlike the Chinese in not being content
to remain at the primitive level of magic square construction,
where the square for each number had to be built by a somewhat
different method. They sought more general solutions, by which
anyone could make a succession of magic squares for a whole series
of odd or even numbers.
We find an initial step in the Brothers' encyclopedia, which went
on to describe how to make the magic square of three (in its
Lo-Shu form) by setting out the numbers in terms of chess moves:
"First, two knight's leaps, then a pawn's step," etc.31 Actually,
this was not an entirely new development: although the chess
terms were new, the Old Chinese had devised a method for stepping
through the Lo-Shu pattern as a kind of ritual, which they called
"the paces of Yii."32 The significant thing is that the Chinese had
never carried this any further; whereas the conception of move-
ment within the confines of the square diagram seems to hav
aroused the curiosity of the Islamic (and Indian) scholars, leading
them to investigate the possibilities of this still further, with som
interesting results.
Someone in the Islamic world-possibly in Persia, before the
Mongol invasions of the early thirteenth century-seems to have
made the great breakthrough, finding a way to make a series of
magic squares for successive odd numbers by a method of con-
tinuous numbering. Unfortunately, there is still only very scanty
information about the development of magic squares in Persia
before the thirteenth century, because of the destructive Mongol
conquests of Iran and Iraq, which followed a period of bitter
sectarian warfare that destroyed much of the Sfifi literature.
However, it seems probable that some of the highest achievements
in the development of magic squares must have taken place there,
to judge from later writings that were obviously based on very
31 See Ahrens, "Studien" (n. 1 above), pp. 207-08, for a discussion of this
square made by chess moves.
32 See S. Cammann, "The Magic Square of Three ... "(n. 2 above), pp. 79-80,
for a discussion of "the paces of Yii."
195
Lo-Shu square that even the Chinese-in spite of all their pre-
occupation with that square-had never discovered.
The unknown innovator must then have looked back at the
magic square of three, to see it in a new way. Just as in his new
square of five, the succession of numbers now seemed to presen
dynamic, continuous process, no longer confined within th
bounds of a rectangle, or forced to proceed by an erratic com
bination of knight's leaps and pawn's steps. In both these square
(of three and five), he viewed the progression of the numbers a
single, flowing motion, proceeding diagonally downward fr
the number 1 (below the center cell), dropping below the bottom
line to reappear at the top, and crossing over the right edge
6 2
11 7 3
16 12 8 4
1 21 17 13 9 5 11 24 7 20 3
4 2 22 18 14 10 4 12 25 8 16
7 5 3 4 9 2 23 19 15 17 5 13 21 9
8 6 3 5 7 24 20 10 18 1 14 22
9 b. 8 1 6 25 d 23 6 19 2 15
reappear at the left. It must have appeared as though the top and
bottom of the square could meet to form a horizontal cylinder,
around which the numbers could entwine; while, in a seeming
paradox, the left and right sides could also meet to form a vertical
cylinder around which the numbers could spiral downward.-
Actually, these two diverse requirements can be satisfied by an
anchor ring, or torus.38
In the diagonally downward course, after meeting the base
number 3 (or 5) or one of its multiples, the experimenter encoun-
tered a block, finding the next cell already occupied, so he was
forced to drop two cells for the following number, in order to be
able to continue on in the same direction. This slight deflection
from the forward progress is now called the "break move."
38 The reader might test this for himself, by writing the square on a thick
plaster ring, or with Chinese ink on a plain doughnut! It can also be done by
making a long narrow square on thin paper, then bending this until the top and
bottom lines meet, and finally joining the ends of this tube until the side lines
meet also.
197
199
17 24 1 8 15
8 1 6 23 5 7 14 16
3 5 7 4 6 13 20 22
4 9 2 10 12 19 21 3
Q.
b. . 1 18 25 2 9
FIa. 5.-A Hindu continuous magic square of five (b), compared with tle
inverted Lo-Shu square of three.
different results, as we shall see in Part II. This method was never
very popular with the Muslims, probably because a difference of
construction caused it to lack the principle of renewal through
the middle number. The Hindus do not seem to have been in-
terested in the middle number, but they found in the sq
made by their method other interesting properties that
illustrate some particular beliefs of their own.
18 10 22 14 1 2 14 21 8 20 15 2 19 6 23
12 4 16 8 25 23 10 17 4 11 16 8 25 12 4
6 23 15 2 19 19 1 13 25 7 22 14 1 18 10
5 17 9 21 13 15 22 9 16 3 3 20 7 24 11
24 11 3 20 7 .6 18 5 12 24 9 21 13 5 17
0. b. c.
FIG. 6.-Islamic
down to left, b
cells to left; (c)
Still a thir
proceeding
knight's mo
books of the
the Indians
43 Several exam
Those in the Ca
200
method, the numbers are set out by moving two cells up (or down)
and one over-in the Muslim world, more frequently to the left-
making break moves after the multiples of the base number, as
usual (see Figure 6). Sometimes they varied the system, by
making "extended knight's moves," taking longer steps vertically
or horizontally, or both.
One very special quality of these knight's-move squares is their
flexibility, their capacity for changing form without losing their
properties. One or more rows can be moved from top to bottom
(or vice versa) and columns can be shifted from one side to the
other, without affecting their "magic" qualities. Since their
essence remained unchanged in spite of rather drastic surface
alterations, these squares were thus effective symbols of an inner
stability in an outwardly changing Universe.
Furthermore, this same quality made it possible to have any
number in the center cell, whereas all the other kinds of magic
squares required the middle number of the sequence in the center.
The Islamic scholars discovered this property, and they utilized
it to make unit-centered magic squares.44 For them, these unit-
centered examples were particularly rich in symbolism, because 1,
as the beginning of numbers and the sign of unity, was an obvious
symbol for Allah the Creator, the ultimate One; and, since the
numbering begins at the 1 in the center and the final break move
leads back to it, these little diagrams of the cosmos in miniature
provided graphic illustrations of the Islamic concept that Allah
is for all things both the Source and the Destination.
In still another respect, these unit-centered magic squares
embodied the Muslim idea that everything springs from the One
and all will ultimately return to the One. The medieval Islamic
mathematicians often practiced "horizontal addition," also
called "casting out nine's."45 Taking a larger number they would
add its digits, and continue to add, until they reduced it to a
single digit. When they did this to the total sum of all the numbers
in a magic square of five, the sum of 325 would be reduced to 1;
for 3+ 2 + 5 = 10, and 1 +0 = 1.-This also worked for the unit-
centered magic squares of seven, where the grand total of 1225
also reduces to 10, then to 1.46
The Islamic knight's-move squares were also remarkable in
being "pandiagonal." For the numbers in every partial diagonal
44 Examples in British Museum Add. 7713, p. 23; and in al-Tustari's Ghayat al-
Murdd, among the magic squares of seven.
45 See Smith, History of Mathematics, I, 151-52.
46 This idea goes back at least as far as Hippolytus; see ibid. p. 152.
201
8 11 14 1
13 2 7 12
3 16 9 6
10 5 4 15
the first eight digits in the core, he set out the remaining numbers
of the first half of the sequence in an elaborate zigzag pattern,
which altered in each second frame, out to the outer rim. Then he
took the second half of the sequence and worked his way back
again to the core, in which he placed the last eight numbers in com-
plementary relation to the first eight. Thus, he created an even
more smoothly flowing-though still erratic-depiction of the
soul's journey outward from the source of life and its eventual
return.
if those who used them knew how to construct them. We shall have
more to say about magic squares in Europe, and the ways in
which people regarded them, in Part II, after discussing the
Indian magic squares which also contributed to the European
tradition.
o20