Review of Literature on 3D Printing in Medicine

Your Name

Institution

Course

Professor’s Name

Date
 Review of Literature on 3D Printing in Medicine

3D printing is a progressive innovation that builds three-layered objects layer by layer

from computerized models. 3D printing is used to create patient-specific anatomical models,

prosthetics, implants, and even organs in the medical field (Herron, 2019). The interaction

includes the layer-by-layer statement of materials like plastics, metals, or natural materials to

fabricate a substantial item founded on a computerized plan. A change in perspective has

happened with the presentation of 3D printing innovation into the clinical field, giving novel

answers for complex medical care issues. This essay thoroughly examines the medical literature

on 3D printing, looking for areas of agreement, areas of disagreement, outliers, influential

sources, questionable claims, and shifts in perspective over time. We anticipate gaining a

comprehensive understanding of the role that 3D printing will play in future medical services

through this survey. The actual expansiveness of the range of utilizations and financial

advantages gives the conviction to support 3D printing as the fate of individualized clinical

benefits. The state ought to create more clinical gadgets utilizing 3D printing, working on the

utilization of this innovation beyond regenerative medication. The state likewise may utilize 3D

printing to give free clinical consideration to poor people and insecure population

Points of Agreement

There is widespread agreement in the literature regarding the transformative potential of

3D printing in medicine. The array of advantages provided by 3D printing technology is

discussed in detail in Blohm (2018), Herron (2019), Rybicki (2021), Rybicki and Award (2017),

and Thomas and Singh (2020). These include tailoring medical equipment, prosthetics, and

anatomical models to each patient's specific needs. Likewise, the limit of 3D printing to help the
prototyping and creation process is extensively perceived, further developing capability and

diminishing costs inside clinical benefits settings.

Points of Disagreement

There is some disagreement regarding safety and regulatory considerations, despite

widespread recognition of the potential benefits of 3D printing in medicine. This uniqueness is

an impression of progressing conversations inside the clinical local area about how to figure out

some kind of harmony between encouraging mechanical headway and protecting patient

government assistance. In the clinical setting, utilitarianism can be applied to assess whether the

advantages of 3D imprinting concerning customized medication, decreased careful dangers, and

further developed patient results offset any expected disadvantages.

Outliers

Thomas and Singh (2020) give a specialized perspective on how 3D printing can be used

in surgery, adding insights specific to this area of medicine to the discussion. These special cases

add to an all the more sweeping cognizance of 3D printing's different consequences for clinical

benefits, to say the least. Rybicki and Grant's (2017) practical guide for medical professionals

may be regarded as influential. The experiences and ideas for incorporating 3D printing into

clinical practice likely come from this source.

Dubious Assertions

Even though the writing is largely free of problematic declarations, logical

inconsistencies regarding administrative considerations may necessitate careful examination.

Diverse perspectives on regulatory issues highlight the significance of ongoing communication

and addressing emerging issues and guarantee the ethical use of 3D printing technology in

healthcare settings. Accomplices can all around gain ground toward directing risks and
expanding the benefits of 3D engraving in drugs by perceiving and separating areas of weakness.

It appears that none of the sources provide problematic examples; In any case, abnormalities in

how managerial issues are overseen could require additional assessment and essential evaluation.

Change Over Time

There has been a major evolution in 3D printing and how it is applied in medicine. This

technology has been seen to be very significant, especially during the Corona pandemic

significant shift in the perception and application of 3D printing in medicine is highlighted in the

literature. 3D printing, which was initially hailed as a promising innovation, has gained

prominence, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has been widely acknowledged for

its crucial role in addressing supply chain disruptions and shortages of personal protective

equipment (PPE). It started as simple technology and has rapidly progressed more so during the

COVID pandemic, it has demonstrated its indispensable role in healthcare resilience.

In conclusion,3D printing shows remarkable potential. There have been discussions that

are in agreement and those that are not in agreement. The outliers provide valuable perspective

on the use of the technology. Over time to come, there will be changes and adaptations in this

field. Different perspectives continue to shape the nature of 3D printing in medicine. On account

of 3D imprinting in medication, deontology can help in surveying the ethicality of the innovation

by looking at whether it sticks to moral standards and obligations. For example, contemplations

might incorporate whether the innovation regards patient independence, guarantees security, and

maintains the standards of advantage and non-evil.

 References

Blohm, C. (2018). 3D printing and medicine. Next-Generation Medical Techno.

Herron, J. (2019). 3D printing in medical libraries: A crash course in supporting innovation in

health care. Rowman & Littlefield.

Rybicki, F. J. (2021). 3D printing in medicine and its role in the COVID-19 pandemic: Personal

protective equipment (PPE) and other novel medical and non-medical devices. Springer

Nature.

Rybicki, F. J., & Grant, G. T. (2017). 3D printing in medicine: A practical guide for medical

professionals. Springer.

Thomas, D. J., & Singh, D. (2020). 3D printing in medicine and surgery: Applications in

healthcare. Woodhead Publishing.