Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Evaluating the impacts of soil structure on mechanical behavior for natural sedimentary clays is an important issue in
geotechnical engineering. Burland introduced void index for normalizing the compression curves of various remolded
and reconstituted clays to obtain the intrinsic compression line, which provides a reference framework to assess the
in-situ compression behavior. However, it does not quantitatively account for the effects of initial water content on
compressive behavior of remolded and reconstituted clays and the initial water contents of clays are not always limited
to 1.0 - 1.5 times the liquid limits defined by Burland. A modification based on collected tests data was presented on the
*
expressions of e100 and Cc* defined by Burland. Extensive oedometer test data were also collected on various re-
molded and reconstituted soils with distinct liquid limits and initial water contents to verify the validity of modified
expressions. A normalized compression line deduced by intrinsic compression line is proposed in the e-log p plot,
which can be used to evaluate the effects of soil structure quantitatively on the intact compressive behavior for natural
sedimentary clays.
Keywords: Initial Water Content; Compression Behavior; Remolded and Reconstituted Clays; Oedometer Test
1. Introduction ing an initial water content being 1.0 - 1.5 times the liq-
uid limit (preferably 1.25 times). However, it does not
When encountered in situ, most natural sedimentary
quantitatively account for the effects of initial water con-
clays show some form of “structure”. It has been well
tent although he presented the existing tests data which
accepted that the structure is formed during their deposi-
showed reconstituted clays at higher water contents had
tional and the post depositional processes, where com-
higher values of the void ratio at applied stress less than
plicated impacts such as mechanical, chemical and bio-
100 kPa. It is well known that natural water contents of
logical factors are brought into action [1]. The general
natural sedimentary soils vary in a wide spectrum of
term “soil structure” is to mean the arrangement and
times liquid limits [5], which are not always limited to
bonding of the soil constituents, and for simplicity it
1.0 - 1.5 times the liquid limits.
contains all features of a soil that are different from those
Based on the existing tests data, the intrinsic compres-
of the corresponding reconstituted soil [2-4]. Various
sion behavior of remolded and reconstituted clays was
experimental data suggests that the mechanical behavior
briefly investigated and a modification was presented on
in situ state influenced by the soil structure is totally dif- *
the expressions of e100 and Cc* defined by Burland for
ferent from the remolded and reconstituted state [3]. How
considering both the effects of liquid limit and initial
to quantitatively assess the effects of soil structure on
water content. A normalized compressive line is deduced
mechanical behavior of natural sedimentary clays is an
by intrinsic compression line to quantitatively evaluate
important issue in geotechnical engineering [3]. For
the effects of soil structure on the intact compressive
solving this problem, the mechanical behavior of the re-
behavior for natural sedimentary clays.
molded and reconstituted clays can be used to establish a
reference framework [3-5]. The most famous normalized
2. Compression Curves of Remolded and
oedometer compression line is the intrinsic compression
Reconstituted Soft Clays
line (ICL), which provides an available reference frame
to assess the in-situ compression behavior proposed. He 42 different remolded and reconstituted soft clay samples
introduced void index for normalizing the compression obtained from three different places in China were col-
curves of various remolded and reconstituted clays hav- lected for oedometer tests. Basic physical indices are
shown in Table 1. both the liquid limit and initial water content.
It should be noted that some of the soft clay samples in
Label 1 were reconstituted by adjusting its initial water 3. Intrinsic Compression Behavior
content (reconstituted clays), the others were just only
remolded (remolded clays). The initial water contents of Burland stated that the properties of remolded or recons-
the 42 samples range from 0.7 to 2.0 times the liquid tituted clays are termed ‘intrinsic’ properties since they
limit. The ratio of initial water content w0 over liquid are inherent to the soil and independent of the natural
limit LL is defined as initial normalized water index w*0 state [3]. He presented a useful normalizing index called
[6], which can be expressed as follow void index Iv for normalizing the compressive behavior
of various remolded and reconstituted clays. The void
w*0 = w0 / LL (1) index is defined as following expression
∗ ∗
The typical compressive curves are shown in Figure e − e100 e − e100 (2)
1(a), Figure 1(b) and Figure 1(c) for the 42 remolded Iv = ∗∗
= ∗
e − e1000
100 Cc
and reconstituted clays respectively [7]. The legend in
* *
each figure represented the initial water contents with the The quantities e100 and e1000 are the void ratios cor-
values of w*0 being 0.71 - 1.98, 0.68 - 1.99, 0.70 - 1.99 responding to the applied stress σ v' = 100kPa and 1000
of each soil corresponding to Table 1. It can be seen that kPa of the reconstituted clay at an initial water content w0
all the compression curves are similar in shape being of 1.0 - 1.5 times the liquid limit, respectively. Cc∗ is
*
slightly concave upwards when the consolidation pres- the intrinsic compression index which equals to e100
*
sure is larger than some value respectively, as described minus e1000 .
by Burland [3]. Comparing through the three figures, Then a reasonably unique compression line termed in-
when the soft clays with about the same initial norma- trinsic compression line (ICL) is obtained, expressed as
lized water index w*0 , at any given value of the consoli- follow
dation pressure, the larger the liquid limit, the higher the
Iv = 2.45 - 1.285x + 0.015x3 (3)
void ratio is. When concerning any of Figure 1, at any
given value of the consolidation pressure, the larger the where x = log σ in kPa. '
v
initial water content, the higher the void ratio and higher When the oedometer tests are not conducted on the
*
compressibility is. However, it is different from that of remolded and reconstituted soils, the values of e100 and
*
Burland. It can be concluded that the compressive beha- e1000 can be approximately calculated by the following
vior of remolded or reconstituted clays is influenced by equations (Burland 1990).
5
4
50.3% 58.5%
64.4% 71.6% 68.3% 78.0% 3.5
82.5% 90.9% 84.8% 91.5% 42.6% 48.3%
57.1% 61.7%
100.8% 110.9% 96.0% 104.3%
4 3 65.8% 72.3%
118.6% 126.1% 3 114.0% 118.5% 80.2% 86.9%
136.9% 143.3% 126.8% 135.0% 91.1% 99.1%
141.8% 146.3% 2.5 106.3% 110.2%
153.3% 162.5%
Void ratio
115.5% 121.5%
3 173.9% 179.7%
Void ratio
Void ratio
2 2
2 1.5
1 1
1
0.5
0
0 0
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Consolidation stress (kPa) Consolidation pressre (kPa) Consolidation pressure (kPa)
Figure 1. Typical e-logp compression curves of remolded and reconstituted soft clays (a) Lianyungang city clay, (b) Huaian
city clay (c), Fouzhou city clay.
∗
e100 = 0.109 + 0.679eL − 0.089eL2 + 0.016eL3 (4) Cc∗ is increased with the LL from Burland and initial
water content or initial normalized water index w*0 .
Cc∗ = 0.256eL − 0.04 (5) Based on the 42 tests data, the best fitted quantitative
equations are given as follows:
where eL represents the void ratio at liquid limit.
∗
Burland has pointed out that the above empirical equa- e100 = 1.13wL + 0.39 w0 wL − 0.084 (6)
tions should only be used for values of eL within the
Cc∗ = 0.91wL + 0.25 w0 wL − 0.461 (7)
range 0.6 to 4.5 (i.e. wL = 25 to 160%).
According to the test data in Figure 1, the compres- Figure 2 shows the comparison between the measured
sion behavior of remolded and reconstituted clays is ob- *
values of e100 and Cc∗ from Figure 1 and the calcu-
viously influenced by both the liquid limit and initial lated values by Equation (6) and (7). It can be seen that
water content. However, the empirical equation (4) and they are quite consistent, indicating that Equation (6) and
*
(5) only consider the effect of liquid limit, for eL = Gs*LL (7) can be used for well predicting the values of e100
∗
when soil is saturated. That is to say, a modification and Cc .
should be given on Equation (4) and (5) for considering For further verifying the validity of Equation (6) and
the effect of initial water content. (7), several researchers who published oedometer test
For simplicity, a liner multiple regression based on data of some remolded or reconstituted clays were col-
tests data in this study is adopted by corresponding com- lected as shown in Table 2.
*
puter software. Considering the value of e100 or The comparison results are shown in Figure 3. It is
2
2
1.5
Calculated values of Cc
1.5
*
Calculated values of e100
*
1
1
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
* *
Measured values of e 100 Measured values of C c
(a) (b)
*
Figure 2. Comparison of the e100 *
and C c* between calculated and measured values (a) for e100 , (b) for C c*
4 2
3.5
3 1.5
Calculated values of e100
Calculated values of Cc
*
*
2.5
2 1
1.5
1 0.5
0.5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
* *
Measured values of e 100 Measured values of C c
(a) (b)
*
Figure 3. Comparison of the e100 and C c* between calculated and measured values in literatures (a) for e100
*
; (b) for C c* .
[10] A. B. Cerato and A. J. Lutenegger, “Determining Intrinsic Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.
Compressibility of Fine-Grained Soils,” ASCE Journal of 130, No. 8, 2004, pp. 872-877.