Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Etymology[edit]
Further information: Daemon (classical mythology), Agathodaemon, Cacodemon, Daimonic,
and Eudaimonia
Ancient Egypt[edit]
and their function can be benevolent towards those who have the secret knowledge to face them.
[15]
Demons protecting the underworld may prevent human souls from entering paradise. Only by
knowing the right charms is the deceased able to enter the Halls of Osiris.[16] Here, the aggressive
nature of the guardian demons is motivated by the need to protect their abodes and not by their
evil essence. Accordingly, demons guarded sacred places or the gates to the netherworld.
During the Ptolemaic and Roman period, the guardians shifted towards the role of genius
loci and they were the focus of local and private cults.
The "wanderers" are associated with possession, mental illness, death and plagues. Many of
them serve as executioners for the major deities, such as Ra or Osiris, when ordered to punish
humans on earth or in the netherworld.[15] Wanderers can also be agents of chaos, arising from
the world beyond creation to bring about misfortune and suffering without any divine instructions,
led only by evil motivations. The influences of the wanderers can be warded off and kept at the
borders of the human world by the use of magic, but they can never be destroyed. A sub-
category of "wanderers" are nightmare demons, which were believed to cause nightmares by
entering a human body.[11]
Mesopotamia[edit]
Further information: Ancient Mesopotamian underworld § Demons
Indian religions[edit]
Hinduism[edit]
See also: Surapadman and Narakasura
The Army of Super Creatures – from The Saugandhika
Parinaya Manuscript (1821 CE)
In the Veda, gods (deva) and anti-gods (asura) share both the upper world. It is only by the time
of the Brahmanas that they are said to inhabit the underworld. The identification
of asura with demons stems from the description of asura as "formerly gods" (pūrvadeva). The
gods are said to have claimed heaven for themselves and tricked the demons, ending on earth.
During the Vedic period, gods aid humans against demons. By that, gods secure their own place
in heaven, using humans as tools to defeat their cosmic enemies.[55]
Asura, in the earliest hymns of the Rigveda, originally meant any supernatural spirit, either good
or bad. Since the /s/ of the Indic linguistic branch is cognate with the /h/ of the Early Iranian
languages, the word asura, representing a category of celestial beings, is a cognate with Old
Persian Ahura. Ancient Hinduism tells that Devas (also called suras) and Asuras are half-
brothers, sons of the same father Kashyapa; although some of the Devas, such as Varuna, are
also called Asuras. Later, during Puranic age, Asura and Rakshasa came to exclusively mean
any of a race of anthropomorphic, powerful, possibly evil beings. Daitya (lit. sons of the mother
"Diti"), Danava (lit. sons of the mother "Danu"), Maya Danava, Rakshasa (lit. from "harm to be
guarded against"), and asura are incorrectly translated into English as "demon".[56]
With increase in asceticism during the post-Vedic period, withdrawal of sacrificial rituals was
considered a threat to the gods.[55] Ascetic humans or ascetic demons were supposed to be more
powerful than gods. Pious, highly enlightened Asuras and Rakshasas, such
as Prahlada and Vibhishana, are not uncommon. The Asura are not fundamentally against the
gods, nor do they tempt humans to fall. Many people metaphorically interpret the Asura as
manifestations of the ignoble passions in the human mind and as symbolic devices. There were
also cases of power-hungry asuras challenging various aspects of the gods, but only to be
defeated eventually and seek forgiveness.
Hinduism advocates the reincarnation and transmigration of souls according to one's karma.
Souls (Atman) of the dead are adjudged by the Yama and are accorded various purging
punishments before being reborn. Humans that have committed extraordinary wrongs are
condemned to roam as lonely, often mischief mongers, spirits for a length of time before being
reborn. Many kinds of such spirits (Vetalas and Pishachas) are recognized in the later Hindu
texts. According to Hinduism, demons are not inherently evil beings, but good by following
their dharma what is being evil and deceitful. However, nothing is purely evil or good, and a
demon could eventually abandon his demonic nature.
Buddhism[edit]
Further information: Mara (demon)
Belief in demons does not constitute an essential feature in Buddhism. However, since belief in
demons were common during the rise of Buddhism, they are integrated into the cycle of
Saṃsāra.[1] Accordingly, their malevolent condition is due to their bad karma from their previous
lives. When Buddhism spread, it accommodated itself with indigenous popular ideas about
demons.[1]
Iranian demons[edit]
Zoroastrianism[edit]
Div-e Sepid, literally "white demon", the chieftain of
Ideas of demons (often called Dīv/Dēw) in Armenia, Turkic countries,[72] and Albania[73] derive
from Persian imagery.[74] At this time, the demons are more anthropomorphized and morally
complex than their original Persian counterparts (daeva).[75](p 37) However, a general negative
association remains during the Islamic period.[76]
Common features of these Middle Eastern demons are their immortality and pernicious nature,
they can turn invisible, and can be enslaved when pierced by a silver needle.[77] Due to their
reluctant nature, even enslaved, they do always the opposite of what has been commanded.
[78]
Like the jinn from Islamic traditions, they can enter sexual relationships with humans and sire
offspring.[79] Demons are believed to be mostly active at night and a bad smell in the air or sudden
change in temperature would announce their presence.[80] In some tales, supernatural powers are
attributed to them, such as causing sickness, mental illnesses, or even turn humans to stone.[81]
Demons are believed to be vanquished by sacred symbols. The content of the symbol depends
on the prevailing religion of the culture. Among Turks, the basmalah ("invocation of the name of
Allah") is used to ward off demons,[82] while among Armenians, the symbol of the cross is utilized.
[77]
The origin of the demons is explained by Abu Ali Bal'ami's interpretation of Tarikh al-Tabari as
the possibly first creation of God (Allah). The demons would have reigned for 70,000 years until
they have been replaced by the jinn (peri). Only then, 5000 years later, the angels (firis̲ h̲ ta) were
sent with Iblis as their leader to chase them away and the story of Adam begins.[75]: 40 According to
the Süleymanname, written during the time of Suleiman the Magnificent, demons were created in
the time between the parī and the angels from the fires of the stars and smoke.[83] Due to
the Islamic belief-system prevailing in Middle Eastern and Central Asian culture at the time,
authors emphasized that demons only exist by God's will and not as an independent or even
accidental part of the world.[84] Muslim authors sometimes identified the demons with the devils
and ifrits of Islamic tradition, as the Quran asserts that it is God who controls both the angels and
devils.[85](p452)
Christianity[edit]
Old Testament[edit]
The existence of demons as inherently malicious spirits within Old Testamental texts is absent.[86]
[87]: 447
Though there are evil spirits sent by YHWH, they can hardly be called demons, since they
serve and do not oppose the governing deity.[87]: 448 First then the Hebrew Bible was translated into
Greek, the "gods of other nations" were merged into a single category of demons (daimones)
with implied negativity.[88]
The Greek Daimons were associated with demi-divine entities, deities, illnesses and fortune-
telling. The Jewish translators rendered them all as demons, depicting their power as nullified
comparable to the description of shedim in the Tanakh. Although all these supernatural powers
were translated, none were angels, despite sharing a similar function to that of the Greek
Daimon. This established a dualism between the angels on God's side and negatively evaluated
demons of pagan origin.[89] Their relationship to the God-head became the main difference
between angels and demons, not their degree of benevolence. Both angels and demons might
be fierce and terrifying. However, the angels act always at service of the high god of the
Israelites, differing from the pagan demons, who represent the powers of foreign deities.[90] The
Septuagint refers to evil spirits as demons (daimon).[citation needed]
New Testament[edit]
Building upon the few references to daimon in the New Testament, especially the poetry of the
Book of Revelation, Christian writers of apocrypha from the second century onwards created a
more complicated tapestry of beliefs about "demons" that was largely independent of Christian
scripture.
While daimons were considered as both potentially benevolent or malevolent, Origen argued
against Celsus that daimons are exclusively evil entities, supporting the later idea of (evil)
demons. According to Origen's cosmology, increasing corruption and evil within the soul, the
more estranged the soul gets from God. Therefore, Origen opined that the most evil demons are
located underground. Besides the fallen angels known from Christian scriptures, Origen talks
about Greek daemons, like nature spirits and giants. These creatures were thought to inhabit
nature or air and nourish from pagan sacrifices roaming the earth. However, there is no
functional difference between the spirits of the underworld and of earth, since both have fallen
from perfection into the material world. Origen sums them up as fallen angels and thus equal to
demons.[103]
Many ascetics, like Origen and Anthony the Great, described demons as psychological powers,
tempting to evil,[104] in contrast to benevolent angels advising good. According to Life of Anthony,
written in Greek around 360 by Athanasius of Alexandria, most of the time, the demons were
expressed as an internal struggle, inclinations, and temptations. But after Anthony successfully
resisted the demons, they would appear in human form to tempt and threaten him even more
intensely.[105]
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite described evil as "defiancy" and does not give evil an
ontological existence. He explains demons are deficient creatures, who willingly turn themselves
towards the unreal and non-existence. Their dangerous nature results not from the power of their
nature, but from their tendency to drag others into the "void" and the unreal, away from God.[10]
Michael Psellos proposed the existence of several types of demons, deeply influenced by the
material nature of the regions they dwell. The highest and most powerful demons attack the mind
of people using their "imaginative action" (phantastikos) to produce illusions in the mind. The
lowest demons, on the other hand, are almost mindless, gross, and grunting spirits, which try to
possess people instinctively, simply attracted by the warmth and life of humans. These cause
diseases, fatal accidents and animalistic behavior in their victims. They are unable to speak,
while other lower types of demons might give out false oracles. The demons are divided into:
Leliouria: The highest demons who inhabit the ether, beyond the moon
Aeria: Demons of the air below the moon
Chthonia: Inhabiting the land
Hyraia/Enalia: Dwelling in the water
Bypochtbonia: They live beneath the earth
Misophaes: The lowest type of demon, blind and almost senseless in the lowest hell
Invocation of Saints, holy men and women, especially ascetics, reading the Gospel, holy oil or
water is said to drive them out. However, Psellos' schemes have been too inconsistent to answer
questions about the hierarchy of fallen angels. The devil's position is impossible to assign in this
scheme and it does not respond to living perceptions of felt experience and was considered
rather impractical to have a lasting effect or impact on Christian demonology.[106]
The contemporary Roman Catholic Church unequivocally teaches that angels and demons are
real beings rather than just symbolic devices. The Catholic Church has a cadre of officially
sanctioned exorcists which perform many exorcisms each year. The exorcists of the Catholic
Church teach that demons attack humans continually but that afflicted persons can be effectively
healed and protected either by the formal rite of exorcism, authorized to be performed only by
bishops and those they designate, or by prayers of deliverance, which any Christian can offer for
themselves or others.[107]
At various times in Christian history, attempts have been made to classify demons according to
various proposed demonic hierarchies.
In recent times, scholars doubted that independent demons exist, and rather considers them,
aking to Jewish satan, to be servants of God. According to S. N. Chiu, God is shown sending a
demon against Saul in 1 Samuel 16 and 18 in order to punish him for the failure to follow God's
instructions, showing God as having the power to use demons for his own purposes, putting the
demon under his divine authority.[108] According to the Britannica Concise Encyclopedia, demons,
despite being typically associated with evil, are often shown to be under divine control, and not
acting of their own devices.[109]
Mandaeism[edit]
Main article: Demons in Mandaeism
See also: Mandaeism and Ruha
In Mandaeism, the World of Darkness (alma d-hšuka), also referred to as Sheol, is
the underworld located below Tibil (Earth). It is ruled by its king Ur (Leviathan) and its
queen Ruha, mother of the seven planets and twelve constellations. The great dark Ocean of
Sup (or Suf) lies in the World of Darkness.[110] The great dividing river of Hitfun, analogous to the
river Styx in Greek mythology, separates the World of Darkness from the World of Light.
[111]
Prominent infernal beings found in the World of Darkness
include lilith, nalai (vampire), niuli (hobgoblin), gadalta (ghost), satani (Satan) and various other
demons and evil spirits.[110][111]
Gnosticism[edit]
Gnosticism largely relies on Greek and Persian dualism, especially on Platonism. In accordance
with Platonism, they regarded the idea as good while considering the material and conscious
world to be inherently evil.[112] The demonized star-deities of late Persian religion became
associated with a demon, thus identifying the seven observable planets with an Archon (demonic
ruler).[112] These demons rule over the earth and the realm of planets, representing different
desires and passions.[113] According to Origen, the Ophites depicted the world as surrounded by
the demonic Leviathan.[113]
Like in Christianity, the term daimons was used for demons and refers to both the Archons as
well as to their demonic assistants. Judas Iscariot is, in the Gospel of Judas, portrayed as
the thirtheenth daimon for betraying Jesus and a supporter of the Archons.[114]
Examples of Gnostic portrayals of demons can be found in the Apocryphon of John in which they
are said to have helped construct the physical Adam[115] and in Pistis Sophia which states they are
ruled over by Hekate and punish corrupt souls.[116]
Islam[edit]
Demons depicted in the Book of Wonders, a late 14th-
Bahá'í Faith[edit]
In the Bahá'í Faith, demons are not regarded as independent evil spirits as they are in some
faiths. Rather, evil spirits described in various faiths' traditions, such as Satan, fallen angels,
demons and jinn, are metaphors for the base character traits a human being may acquire and
manifest when he turns away from God and follows his lower nature. Belief in the existence of
ghosts and earthbound spirits is rejected and considered to be the product of superstition.[137]
Occultism[edit]
In occultism, demons are often seen as beneficial and useful, lacking an inherent negative
connotation.[138] While some people fear demons, or attempt to exorcise them, others willfully
attempt to summon them for knowledge, assistance, or power. William of Conches (c.
1090/1091 – c. 1155/1170s) understands 'demon' closer to the Greek 'daimon', reserving the
concept of the "devil" only for the "demons of the lower regions":
You think, as I infer from your words, that a demon is the same as a devil, which is not the case.
For a demon is said to be any invisible being using reason, as if knowing. Of these the two high
orders are called calodemons, that is, 'good knowing ones', the lower order is called cacodemon,
that is, 'evil knowing one', for calos means 'good', cacos 'bad'.[139]
The ceremonial magician usually consults a grimoire, which gives the names and abilities of
demons as well as detailed instructions for conjuring and controlling them. Grimoires are not
limited to demons – some give instructions for the invocation of deity, a process called theurgy.
The use of ceremonial magic to call demons is also known as goetia, a word derived from the
Greek word "goes", which originally denoted diviners, magicians, healers, and seers.[140]
In modernity[edit]
The classic oni, a Japanese ogre-like creature which often has horns and
often translated into English as "demon".
The Age of Enlightenment conceptualizes humans as autonomous individuals, mostly
independent from outer invisible forces, such as demons or gods ruling over human fate.
[141]
Previously, the world was understood to be inhabited by various spirits and demons. With the
rise of the rationalistic school of thought, the existence of foreign unknown forces was
increasingly rejected.[141] Demons were explained as non-existent. Visions of demons and ghosts
were explained as the products of one's own mind. By labelling local deities and demons as
superstition, local religious ideas were banished, supporting the promotion of nationwide gods
and religions.[142] Because of that, demons became increasingly associated with delusions.
Wilkinson Duran states that people who believe in demons are often marginalized in the United
States.[141] The notion of possession was at odds with Western philosophy, such as the American
Dream and capitalism, which implies the belief that everyone is responsible for their own fate and
not at the mercy of external forces.[141]
Psychological approach[edit]
Islamic world[edit]
A minority of Muslim scholars in the Medieval Age, often associated with the Muʿtazila and
the Jahmītes, denied that demons (jinn, devils, divs etc.) have physicality and asserted, they
could only affect the mind by waswās (Arabic: َو ْس َو اس, 'demonic whisperings in the mind').[127](p 73)
[143]
Some scholars, like ibn Sina,[144](p 89) rejected the reality of jinn altogether. Al-Jāḥiẓ and al-
Masʿūdī, explained jinn and demons as a merely psychological phenomena. In his Kitāb al-
Hayawān, al-Jāḥiẓ states that jinn and demons are the product of loneliness. Such a state
induces people to mind-games, causing waswās.[129](p36) Al-Masʿūdī is similarly critical regarding
the reality of demons. He states that alleged demonic encounters are the result of fear and
"wrong thinking". Alleged encounters are then told to other generations in bedtime stories and
poems. When they grow up, they remember such stories in a state of fear or loneliness. This
encourages their imaginations, resulting in another alleged demonic encounter.[129](p37)
Western world[edit]
Psychologist Wilhelm Wundt remarked that "among the activities attributed by myths all over the
world to demons, the harmful predominate, so that in popular belief bad demons are clearly older
than good ones."[145] Sigmund Freud developed this idea and claimed that the concept of demons
was derived from the important relation of the living to the dead: "The fact that demons are
always regarded as the spirits of those who have died recently shows better than anything the
influence of mourning on the origin of the belief in demons."[146]
M. Scott Peck, an American psychiatrist, wrote two books on the subject, People of the Lie: The
Hope For Healing Human Evil[147] and Glimpses of the Devil: A Psychiatrist's Personal Accounts
of Possession, Exorcism, and Redemption.[148] Peck describes in some detail several cases
involving his patients. In People of the Lie he provides identifying characteristics of an evil
person, whom he classified as having a character disorder. In Glimpses of the Devil Peck goes
into significant detail describing how he became interested in exorcism in order to debunk
the myth of possession by evil spirits – only to be convinced otherwise after encountering two
cases which did not fit into any category known to psychology or psychiatry. Peck came to the
conclusion that possession was a rare phenomenon related to evil and that possessed people
are not actually evil; rather, they are doing battle with the forces of evil.[149]
Although Peck's earlier work was met with widespread popular acceptance, his work on the
topics of evil and possession has generated significant debate and derision. Much was made of
his association with (and admiration for) the controversial Malachi Martin, a Roman
Catholic priest and a former Jesuit, despite the fact that Peck consistently called Martin a liar and
a manipulator.[150]
LINK : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon