Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PASCUAL
CYBEL ALLEN N. CRUZ
11 ABM
What are the strongest and weakest parts of the author’s treatment of the topic?
They provided data and studied different claims to support and show that fake news and internet
propaganda are happening. In the data provided, they showed that politics dominated it. They studied 256
claims from October 2021 to March 2022. And out of all these claims, they gathered nuances in the claims,
207 claims that are falsehoods, and 39 missed contexts. Out of the 256 claims, 179 are about politics.
Moreover, the author has provided solutions to stop fake news from spreading — the mobilization of
fandoms and their celebrities against disinformation and most importantly, education. The article,
however, is still lacking. The author claims that the number of interactions was extracted through their
own estimation methodology. There’s a tendency that the data may be inaccurate or biased since they did
not fully disclose the said methodology. It may be just an estimate, but the number they projected may
still impact the overall article.
What is your overall critical assessment of the author’s treatment of the topic?
The author, Gerardo V. Eusebio, is an expert in this field and has the knowledge to share how fake news
and internet propaganda was being used in the Philippines. The article was explained effectively by giving
information about fake news in the Philippines and the Philippine elections in 2022. Also, providing current
data that they studied helped in understanding how the Philippines are being vulnerable to fake news and
internet propaganda. The article was an eye opener for the mass because it shows how problems escalated
when misinformation is spread to the public. The article contains not only the points and details about
fake news, but also the solutions on how to face and stop the danger of misinformation.
Writing@Franklin
<http://writing.franklin.edu>