Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluate
Street
Transformations
A Focus on Pop-up and Interim Road Safety Projects
Fortaleza, Brazil
Harness short-term impact 02 A1 Understand and prioritize 12 B1 Organize the team 26 Acknowledgements 76
Street transformations 04 the issues at hand Identify surveyors and resources 26 Key terms 78
How to navigate this handbook 08 Train and brief surveyors 27
References 79
A2 Select metrics that will 16 Define data collection schedule 28
evaluate the project goals Make a surveyor location map 29 Appendix 80
Library of metrics 17 How to use the templates 81
Measure what matters most 20 B2 Select appropriate tools 32 Templates 83
Visual documentation tools 32
A3 Determine when to collect data 22 Data collection tools 36
Street transformations 04
How to navigate this handbook 08
Street transformations
This handbook is intended to be applicable for “pop-up”, “interim”, and capital construction
street transformation projects, with a focus on the first two types. Data can, and should, be
collected at all phases whenever possible.
How do we define these different types of street transformations? The three types of street transformations may occur in a sequence:
Pop-up street transformation project Typical steps of street transformation project Project planning Build Post-implementation
Lasting a few hours up to a few days, a pop-up project is a quick way Analyze site challenges and opportunities
to generate excitement, demonstrate the immediate impacts of a Engage stakeholders
design on a project site, trial a new design, and make the case for an
interim project. A pop-up project uses temporary paint, cones, free- Develop a project vision
standing delineators, movable street furniture, and/or barriers. Plan and design
For more information on how to implement a pop-up or interim street transformation effectively,
reference the How to Implement Street Transformations handbook.
Project site:
LeGare intersection had long been a hotspot for
road crashes, with more than 80 crashes recorded
between June 1 and November 30, 2015. Given its POP-UP
POP-UP PROJECT INTERIM PROJECT CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION
poor safety record and high pedestrian volume,
LeGare was chosen for the first pop-up project in The intersection geometry was The successful one-day trial In October 2017, a longer-term
the city. transformed using chalk, string, helped gain support from local design was implemented.
and plants borrowed from a local officials to pursue a six-month
The data collected at the
nursery. Lanes were narrowed interim street transformation.
previous stage garnered
Project outcome and aligned to shorten crossing
A lack of proven local precedents, support for the permanent
distances and lower vehicle
limited funding, and regulatory construction of the project.
After the interim transformation, turning speeds.
restrictions created barriers for The LeGare experience led to
there was a 33% reduction in innovative solutions. The interim the development of the citywide
The one-day implementation, a
vehicular speeds on weekends, project allowed Addis Ababa to Safe Intersections Program, and
INTERIM first for the city, gave the team the
opportunity to engage with head trial ideas in a flexible, low-cost over 17 intersections have been
92% of surveyed pedestrians way before investing in permanent transformed since 2018.
city officials. They were able to see
were satisfied with levels of construction. The six-month
and experience the site, analyze
safety, comfort, convenience, and duration also provided enough
critical movements, and to collect
attractiveness (compared to 24% time to collect longer-term data,
data quickly. This was a powerful
before), which showed reduced vehicle
tool to get permission to paint
and enter the interim project turning speeds and increased
and 13% more pedestrians pedestrian satisfaction and
stage to collect more robust data.
crossed the street on protection.
protected facilities
CAPITAL
Reference A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5
section
Process of Understand and Select metrics that Determine when Organize Select Collect data Standardize and Communicate
evaluating a street prioritize the issues will evaluate the to collect data the team appropriate tools on site analyze the data the results
transformation at hand project goals
What you will find → Compile data from → Define what a → Create a schedule → Identify, train, → Select visual → Prepare → Use → Use a variety
in this section existing databases, successful project to collect the same and brief documentation forms/boards spreadsheets of visual tools
archives, and online would look like and data before, during, surveyors tools according to support and other and strategies
research about the achieve and after the project to what you standardized tools to extract to disseminate
project site and → Define the
is implemented want to capture data collection valuable information
surrounding network → Prioritize the metrics data collection
to understand the and show metrics about your
that matter most schedule → Understand
impact over time project
→ Identify preliminary to demonstrate the and prepare → Prepare data different → Analyze the
throughout the
data to collect on site impact of the project a surveyor collection types of data, variation in
process and
from conversations location map to tools that will tools that can data (before,
beyond
with communities, guide the team support the support its during, and
site observation, etc. on site counts and collection, and after the → Encourage
measurements things to look project is built) broader
→ Come to an
on site out for while on to understand conversations
agreement about the
the project site shifts in use about the
collective goals and
and function, important
priorities
and to evaluate role of our city
the resulting streets
impacts
Library of metrics 17
Measure what matters most 20
10 How to Evaluate Street Transformations São Paulo, Brazil How to Evaluate Street Transformations 11
Identify where to start | Understand and prioritize the issues Identify where to start | Understand and prioritize the issues at
Types of data: What data exists, what is missing, and how can it be sourced or collected?
→ What should be collected at the site, online, and/or from the city’s existing databases and archives?
Online research → What preliminary data do we already have about the city and neighborhood scales?
Existing databases and
→ What additonal data do we need to study the challenges, potential benefits and impacts of the project?
archival research Additional baseline data
→ What resources are available? (Staff, finances, materials?)
can be found outside of city
For instance, crash, injury,
archives, including local news
and traffic fatality data can Collect more background data on site
and research conducted by
typically be sourced from
other organizations. → With whom in the community can the team conduct preliminary conversations and surveys to better
your city’s police department
understand the needs and priorities for the space?
or paramedic records. Other
→ Who are the main users of the street and what are their stories, key destinations, and activities?
useful data could include
→ Do the site dimensions match the existing technical drawings?
land use, demographic Interviews, focus groups,
information, street user and intercept surveys Identify collective goals and priorities
counts, and more.
To understand the priorities, → What is the main issue that the project seeks to address?
insights and feedback of → Which street user(s) will the project prioritize?
community members and → What do communities at and adjacent to the project site care about the most?
G
S Information from other stakeholders. → What changes might the project cause, and how will they be managed? (For instance: redirected traffic
D
G technical drawings routes)
→ What are the top three to five project priorities, being cognizant of the timeline and the city’s goals?
Study and confirm
dimensions of existing base Observational data Define success
maps or create new ones
To understand behavior, → What is the desired, measurable impact of the project?
to include the necessary
activity, challenges, and → Does success mean different things to the decision maker (who may have final say on whether an interim
details that can influence
characteristics of a project project is made permanent) and to the community? Where are the commonalities?
your design decisions and
site. This can be qualitative → In one year’s time, what would the team aspire to say about the project to the community? To other city
operational changes.
and/or quantitative. agencies? How would this be communicated?
→ How would communities ideally be using the new space?
GDCI partnered with the City of Fortaleza to improve pedestrian Collect more background data on site
safety and walkability in the heart of the city’s commercial center on → Existing pedestrian desire lines: especially midblock locations where there were no crosswalks
the Barão do Rio Branco corridor. → The number of pedestrians walking on the roadbed: with inadequate sidewalk space, an average
This case study breaks down how to define a vision for success and of 200 people per hour were left to walk on the roadbed, putting themselves at risk from oncoming
the subsequent data to collect following the steps listed on the vehicles.
previous page. → Number of street users by travel mode: 67% of the street space was allocated for motorized
Reference the continuation of this case study on page 72 for more vehicles, although that mode accounts for less than 25% of the street users.
information on how outcomes were communicated in this project.
→ Speeds of motor vehicles to show the need for traffic-calming elements: peak speeds measured
at the site reached 50 km/h.
→ Perceptions of the project site: the Fortaleza team surveyed people to understand their
What data exists, what is missing, and how can it be sourced or collected? perceptions of the challenges and opportunities on site.
1,984
The examples below highlight a couple metrics that were created from data that was sourced and collected
pedestrians/hour Reference Section B for tips on how to document the existing
prior to project development. conditions mentioned in this case study.
544
motorized vehicles/hour Identify collective goals and priorities
Existing database and Observational data
→ Which street user(s) will the project prioritize?
archival research
Pedestrians walking in the downtown area
→ Ultimate project priority:
Reduce pedestrian road traffic fatalities. This will take multiple years of recurring data collection,
The chance that a pedestrian will be Before the transformation of Rua Barão
P paired
P with a broader, citywide data collection effort to measure this resulting impact.
struck by a vehicle is 90% higher in the do Rio Branco, 67% of the street space
downtown core than the rest of the city was allocated for motorized vehicles, → Top three immediate priorities:
• Reallocate space between the different modes, giving more space to pedestrians and less
33
although that mode accounts for less than
% of the street users
25%
60 % space to motor vehicles.
pedestrian facilities pedestrian facilities
downtown • Reduce speeds with traffic-calming elements.
• Reduce pedestrians’ risk and exposure to vehicles while crossing the street.
Define success
→ What is the desired, measurable impact of the project?
• Fewer pedestrians walking on the roadbed
• Reduced vehicle speeds
Barão do Rio Branco corridor
• Increased number of traffic-calming elements
• Increased square footage and quantity of pedestrian space and facilities
• High approval rating from community
91 pedestrians were killed
in traffic crashes in the City → In one year’s time, what would the team ideally like to say about the project?
BEFORE How would the team respond to critics?
of Fortaleza in 2018
The project created safe walking environments for pedestrians, supported the most vulnerable
road users, and brought the community into the process.
→ Number of pedestrians by age and gender → Number of cyclists and micromobility users
→ Number of pedestrians by type of activity per day These might include, but are not limited to:
and duration of stay → Percentage of cyclists and shared
→ The number of pedestrians and cyclists killed → Degree of public involvement in the planning
→ Number of pedestrians walking on the micromobility users riding within facilities
or seriously injured (KSI) process
roadbed vs. on dedicated facilities vs. on the sidewalk
→ The levels of pedestrian/cyclist/motorist → The public and personal fiscal cost of
→ Number of pedestrians crossing the street → Change in volume of clients at local
perceptions of risk and comfort commuting
with and without crossing facilities businesses before and after a cycle lane is
implemented → The percentage of overall street network with → The urban heat island effect at a local and
→ Number of people at transit stops safe access for all users city scale
→ Cyclists’ level of stress and comfort
→ Average time it takes for pedestrians to → Mode share breakdown and travel times → Ambient concentration of air pollution
finish crossing the street (particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide,
→ Frequency, reliability and affordability of
→ Number of people using spaces with public transit services by neighborhood measured at a local and city scale)
polluted/clean air Motor vehicle → Prevalence of asthma and new cases of
→ The percentage of population living...
→ Pedestrians’ perception of safety and behavior and speed asthma attributed to air pollution
→ ... near public transit stations and stops
comfort level → Percentage of kids with respiratory issues
→ Peak and average motor vehicle speed → ... near safe cycle facilities
→ Percentage of traffic traveling within the → Change in sales tax receipts and in number of
Different survey questions can help → ... within a 10-minute walk to bike share
speed limit total customers from adjacent businesses
understand the nuances of the facilities
→ Percentage of drivers yielding for pedestrians → Overall economic health of local businesses
perception of safety and comfort: → ... within a 60-minute transit ride to
at crossings
→ Do you feel empowered to move education and employment opportunities
around as a result of this project? → Percentage of motorcyclists wearing helmets
→ ...within a 10-minute walk to quality parks,
→ Is this a place where you would → On-street parking spaces converted into play areas, and public spaces
choose to meet your friends? pedestrian spaces
→ Can people easily walk/bike to this
→ Average travel time of buses/transit Being that walking, cycling and public transit are frequently the most affordable way to
place?
→ Do you see a mix of ages and → Loading locations and durations travel, providing ample opportunities to safely use these modes of travel within a reasonable
ethnic groups that generally reflect → Vehicular drop-off locations and durations distance from home to areas of opportunity (education, jobs, healthcare, groceries, etc.) are
the community at large? key to transportation equity improvement. For this analysis, metrics can be disaggregated
→ Noise pollution levels
→ Are there activities happening here for specific population groups, including: by race and ethnicity, by income level, for users with
→ Emission of air pollutants and number of disabilities, etc.
that you enjoy?
polluting vehicles in the area
Measure what matters most This data contributes to project goals, such as:
Collect data related to existing challenges and defined project → Making pedestrians and vulnerable road users feel safe
Consider studying multiple scales
goals before and after the street transformation to understand → Reducing vehicle speeds
of the site to identify how it
its impact. The diagrams below show an example of a project functions as part of the immediate → Accommodating freight deliveries
site’s existing challenges, project goals, the corresponding and larger street network: at the → Providing adequate pedestrian/cycling infrastructure
data points to collect, and the relationship among the three. local scale, neighborhood scale, → Encouraging safer driving behavior
and city scale. → Eliminating road safety crashes and fatalities
Pedestrians perceive the Pedestrian and cyclist crash High pedestrian volumes Cyclists do not have Survey how pedestrians Measure the new travel lane Count pedestrians who Count the number of cyclists
street as an unsafe and rates and fatalities are crossing without pedestrian dedicated infrastructure
1 perceive the street’s safety at
2 dimensions and calculate
3 are walking on and off of
4 and micromobility users who
unpleasant place to walk. reported to be high. infrastructure and lack of and are forced to ride with locations where there have how the narrower travel sidewalks and crossings are using the new bike lane
space for stationary activities vehicular traffic at unsafe been transformations. lanes impact corridor to understand if new or riding with vehicle traffic.
1 Survey how pedestrians Document lane width
2 near a pick-up/drop-off zone. speeds. speeds. pedestrian infrastructure
perceive the street’s safety dimensions, blind spots, and adequately addresses need
at different locations and corridor speeds. Count pedestrians who are Count the number of cyclists
3 4 and reduces risk.
how it can be improved. walking on and off of the and micromobility users
sidewalk to understand risk on the street, and note any
levels and where additional qualitative observations
pedestrian infrastructure is about behaviors and their
needed. safety in these conditions.
4
1
4 1
7
1
5 2
7 5
1 3
2 3
3
3
A3 | Determine when
to collect data Collect the data at various stages
Data collection before the project has been implemented provides the baseline with which to compare the
Once the priorities are set, create a plan to measure and collect after conditions. Many physical and operational changes can be measured from design drawings or plans,
data before, during, and after your street transformation project and confirmed on site afterward. The change in use or function of the street can sometimes be measured
is built. Examine the variation between the sets of data to immediately after implementation, with follow-up weeks or months afterwards. The longer-term resulting
understand the changes to the street condition, measure shifts impacts may take months or years to determine.
in use and function, and evaluate the resulting impacts of the The table below shows a sample of data to collect at various stages before and after the project is
project. implemented to reveal the impact.
Collect data before implementing the project to: Examples of data points to collect and measure When to collect and measure
→ Understand the site and define a vision
→ Have a benchmark to compare future data. Remember that the “after” data needs to be Physical and operational changes
collected at the same time/conditions/place as the baseline data Presence and width of sidewalks (in square meters)
→ Document and understand community members’ and other stakeholders’ needs, interests, Number and quality of pedestrian crossings
and knowledge
→ Locate activities, obstacles, and opportunities to implement specific design elements and
Changes in use and function
take plenty of “before” photos to show the change!
Number of pedestrians walking on the roadbed
vs. on dedicated pedestrian facilities
Collect data during or immediately after implementing the project to:
→ Keep up momentum and continue to be transparent by communicating short-term results Pedestrians’ perception of safety and comfort level
and initial reactions from the community Volume of cyclists and micromobility users per day
→ Document immediate physical and operational changes Average motor vehicle speeds
→ Refine the design based on new observations
→ Begin to build the case for a more permanent project
Resulting impacts
Percent of road users walking and cycling
Collect data weeks, months, or years after implementing the project to:
Number of pedestrians killed or seriously injured (KSI)
→ Assess longer-term changes in usage, function, and perception of the site
→ Inform new policies and future designs for similar projects
Immediately after
In order to replicate the data collection methodology and accurately measure change,
the research design needs to remain stable throughout studies conducted over successive
months and years. It is crucial to collect the before and after data and documentation at
Before
During
the same time of day, the same day of the week, and in comparable conditions.
Site analysis 42
Measuring perception 44
Counting pedestrians 48
Counting cyclists and micromobility users 56
Counting vehicles 58
Measuring vehicle speeds 60
→ Establish a meeting point and time, and walk through the site with all
4 On-site debrief
the surveyors before beginning the counts.
→ Give an overview of the site conditions, operations, and functions at
each data collection location.
→ Be clear about how surveyors can communicate the project goals to
passersby when they are not conducting counts, and keep track of
potential local partners.
PVC
01
sidewalk’s clear path to interfere
03
PVC
estimating certain counts? below. Cancel and reschedule if conditions will 04
PAM
PVC
01
with pedestrian movement and
not be reasonably comparable.
04
the morning, noon, and evening hours, sometimes → Holidays 02 Each surveyor should mark their
PV 7
→ Festivals, markets, parades, strikes, sporting standing location for all “before”
C
0
C
the time or staff are limited. In that case, collect PV 6
0
data for a portion of an hour and then estimate events C data collection on a basemap.
02
volumes on a street, collect this data for intervals → Seasonal or recurring events (summer streets, 0
or construction will hinder the
of 15-, 20-, or 30-minutes. Multiply the results to block parties) surveyor’s ability to return to the
PV 9
PV 0
C
0
C
exact same location to measure
1
calculate the hourly totals. → Road closures
→ Ensure school is consistently in session or C
the “after” data, and adjust the
PV 1
These short interval counts should be repeated at not in session as it impacts travel times and 1
PV position accordingly.
C
PV 1 12 C
least three times a day to get an accurate sample. volumes 1
PAM PV
03 12 C
This interim street transformation project was implemented on a mixed-use commercial corridor in
the borough of Penha, São Paulo. Data was collected on pedestrian and vehicle movements to assess In this schedule, note that more surveyors are present during hours that are popular for lunch
the impact of the project design on road safety. time to capture peak volumes for pedestrians. More surveyors are also present to count vehicles
at 7 am when people are commonly driving to work in order to capture the different peak hours
The chart below clearly notes the data type, the surveyor who will be responsible, and the timeframe,
for each mode of travel.
and it gives basic instructions. The data codes correspond with locations on the map on next page.
S-1
Pedestrian
Count S-2 V P
Counts
Show number of C CR
Str
Counts
eet
CR Street A
the road and 01 01 03 01 01
B
main desire lines
Vehicle
Counts
Count vehicles
Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor
V Street A by type and
02 03 02 02 02
direction
Legend
Counts
Cyclist
Count cyclists
Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor
C Street A by type and
03 02 02 02 02
direction “Invisible line” reference xx Data code Path the Activity Map (A) will cover
Intercept
Survey
Indicate main
Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor Surveyor
A Street A activities at
04 04 04 03 04 crossing that line. Mark it on your basemap: this
location
“invisible line” will help the surveyor focus on one
section of the street to facilitate the counts, minimize
Vehicle Speeds
Before After
Be conscious about the weather and time of during, and after 4 GB 30,000 5 min 9,300 32.0
day. If there are shadows in the “before” photos, 8 GB 60,000 10 min 5,400 37.0
try to capture the same time of day in the
16 GB 120,000 1 hr 1,040 43.0
“after.” If possible, shoot at twilight/dusk when
the light is softer but the streets are still active. 32 GB 240,000 4 hr 268 44.0
BEFORE BEFORE
Portable speed radar Tally counters Timers Measuring tapes Noise and air Sensor and digital
and wheels quality devices counter technology
Portable speed radars User volumes can be Set stopwatches or personal
document moving vehicle counted with analog phone timers for the duration Use measuring tapes or Decibel meters, air sensors, When available, high-
speeds on site. It is helpful to tally counters, digital of the counting interval to let lasers to get dimensions of and smartphones are used resolution video analysis
know the existing speed limit tally counters, or phone surveyors know when to stop/ lanes, sidewalks, building to measure noise and air tools, laser scanners,
and if there are other speed applications (if it is safe to start a new round of counts, heights, and street elements’ pollution on the project infrared beams, and more
controls such as cameras or use phones openly). Count or to measure the time street distances. Even if a base site and in surrounding can be used for collecting
display boards in the area. pedestrians, bicycles, motor users need to cross. drawing exists, plan to verify areas. These are especially data. These systems can
vehicles, and other modes. the dimensions and any important to further document speed, mode
recent changes on site. arguments for street designs share breakdowns, and
that improve public health user volumes, and they can
and livability, especially for process results through
vulnerable populations such specific software. However,
as young children, older since video is the most
adults, people with health commonly available tool, this
issues, and disabled people. handbook focuses on video
and manual analysis.
4 User groups
Select user groups and the level
of detail (age, gender, ability,
etc.) to be collected according to
project goals and context.
5 Data input
5
Clearly document data
according to the instructions.
Annotate totals to facilitate
data tabulation.
with the relevant tools, and providing information about where annotate information about the project site.
surveyors can find water, food, restrooms, health services, and
extra materials if needed. When counting pedestrians and cyclists, it is helpful to indicate any observational data
Refer to the the Surveyor Checklist in about age, ability, and gender. Each form should focus on the user groups most relevant to the
the Appendix. context. This handbook breaks down multiple ages and abilities when collecting data about
pedestrians and cyclists. Delete or replace the user groups as necessary, and simplify what
is collected on high-volume streets. This data must always be used anonymously, but can be
useful in furthering agendas that prioritize the safety and comfort of groups such as children,
caregivers, women, and older people, who might need more nuanced design accommodations.
→
1 Locate one surveyor on each side of the
street to count movement going in each travel
direction. For instance, on busy crossings 2
surveyors on opposite sidewalks can count only
the pedestrians crossing towards them.
→
2 A surveyor should focus on only one street
user and type of movement at a time.
→
3 Use a tally counter for the most common user
type and draw tally marks on your count form
for all others. For instance, if children are the 3
most common pedestrian, use a tally counter
Site analysis in São Paulo, Brazil for them, and tally marks on your count form for
adult caregivers and older people.
Site analysis: Existing conditions and geometry What your forms could look like:
Spend time understanding the neighborhood elements, and activities on site to create 1 General information
and specific site. Place existing plans or an accurate basemap. Be intentional about 2 Descriptive legend
maps of the site in the blank space on what is marked on the basemap, as not 1
the form, and take this to the project site. everything will be relevant to your project 2 3 Mark key elements for street context
Mark exact dimensions, geometries, street design.
4 Street section with dimensions
Measuring perception: Interactive boards What your boards could look like:
Be present on site, make connections Why is this important? 1 Data about the site
with local residents and street users, and → To know how people feel about the site and learn 2 Clear question and
create an opportunity for conversation and from local insights instructions
participation. Engagement through posters → To collect information on feelings of personal
and boards is one of many methods to gather safety, accessibility and belonging 1 3 Space for leaving
input and understand priorities for the site. → To locate the specific parts of the street where comments and voting
challenges exist
→ To communicate the process that contributed to 4 Photos of the site
the site selection and the project goals 2
→ To demonstrate possibilities for the site, and the 5 Entities involved
Tools you’ll need:
expected benefits and outcomes of the project in the process
→ To display examples of potential design See Appendix for printable versions
interventions, and receive feedback of these and other boards.
3
Stickers/markers Printed boards Refer to the How to Implement Street Transformations
handbook for more detail on how to communicate
specific information at each stage of the project.
Enable participation
Provide methods so people of all ages and abilities → Have people on the team who are ready to listen 4
can easily share their ideas without relying on and document what the community has to say
technical knowledge and vocabulary: → Provide online tools to engage virtual audiences 5
→ Avoid technical drawings and plans to present → Provide interpretation services and prints, and
the design; simple diagrams and graphics that support for visual and hearing impairments
show the main changes are preferable
→ Post boards at different locations around the site
→ Use photos and footage of the site to discuss and in high-traffic public spaces/buildings
existing challenges and design possibilities by
overlaying the images with the proposed changes
→ Use images of real-life examples to showcase
design possibilities
5
→ Use cut-out elements to scale, that people
can pin or stick to a base map, to assist in
communication of design ideas 3
→ Hang banners, maps, and posters with clear
questions and information at the project site,
where passersby can write, draw, or use colored
stickers to respond (see example on the right
page)
Surveyor explaining the boards in Mumbai, India
5
→ Add space for extra → Can people easily walk/bike to this place?
notes that they may → Do you see a mix of ages and ethnic groups
have about the site
that generally reflect the community at large?
4 → Are there activities happening here that you
See Appendix for a printable
version of this form. enjoy?
Refer to page 18 for additional → Are there enough place to sit? Are seats
survey question ideas. Intercept survey in Istanbul, Turkey
conveniently located?
Counting pedestrians: On and off sidewalks Pedestrians are forced to walk on the roadbed due to narrow
sidewalks and obstructions to the clear path
Identify different pedestrian types Why is this important?
according to which user groups are relevant → To understand who uses the street
to the context and if they are walking on the → To count pedestrian volumes
sidewalk. Separate sidewalk counts by side → To understand if existing pedestrian facilities
of the street if relevant. Count for a period such as sidewalks are adequately maintained,
of at least 15 minutes. free of obstructions, wide enough, etc.
→ To use this information to assess pedestrian
exposure to risk from oncoming traffic
Tools you’ll need:
Counting pedestrians: Desire lines High pedestrian volumes crossing long distances without
crossing facilities
Desire lines indicate pedestrians’ desired Why is this important?
paths. Drawing where people cross the street → To document the need for pedestrian facilities
can reveal specific locations where there is at specific locations (such as sidewalks, refuge
a need for improved or additional facilities to islands, or new pedestrian crossings where the
allow pedestrians to cross safely. This can be distances between existing crossings are too far)
especially important to observe in the middle → To explain pedestrian exposure to risk by
of a block and at intersections. Use multiple documenting long crossing distances without
protection
forms to allow you to focus on small sections
→ To design for easier and safer access to popular
of the street at a time. origins and destinations
Tools you’ll need:
Observe pedestrians’ desire
Timelapse-cameras can be especially
lines to determine where a new
effective for capturing desire lines and
pedestrian queuing. crossing would allow them to
Timers Count forms Tally counters Cameras safely cross to key destinations
2 Location map
3 Surveyor position
2 → Surveyor should
mark their position
and the perimeter
that is visible
Sidewalk New space for pedestrians Surveyor Pedestrians counted off crossing
Counting pedestrians: Safe crossings The crossing is not in line with the natural flow of pedestrians.
People are observed walking in the roadbed.
Identify different pedestrian types, the the distance is too long, or the signal is too
volumes, and if they are crossing the street short. Adjust the counts to the signal cycle
on existing crossings or on the roadbed. The if applicable. For instance, if the cycle is 90
Identify different pedestrian
form below identifies whether pedestrians seconds (1.5 minutes), count 10 cycles for 15 types and if they are moving
are walking or rushing across the street minutes. within designated pedestrian
during the signal cycle. Rushing may indicate facilities or on the roadbed
3 Pedestrian type
Street transformation projects can also hour. Alternatively, you can stand in a central
generate public spaces as they redistribute location, depending on the scale of the site.
space to pedestrians. Define the boundary Collect information about co-benefits of the Note locations where people are
of the area being surveyed and create a project, such as new stationary activities setting up informal seating, for
route to walk around the boundary once an after the project is built. instance, without adequate space
that could block pedestrian clear
paths
Tools you’ll need: Why is this important?
→ To enhance understanding of the place, dynamics
and activities in public space, and the change
after the project is built
→ To design better spaces according to observed
Count forms Cameras
activities
→ To demonstrate that streets can be used for more
functions and activities than moving vehicles
→ To make the case for other public spaces
throughout the city
What your form could look like:
Measuring before street transformation
Counting cyclists and micromobility users Cyclists do not have dedicated infrastructure and are
forced to ride with vehicles driving at unsafe speeds
Count all bicyclists and micromobility users counts those who are riding within a cycle
riding through the project site according to facility, the second row for those traveling
age, type of bicycle, or other category that on the sidewalk, and the third row to mark Count the number of cyclists and
corresponds most with the project goals. cyclists traveling in the roadbed with other micromobility users on the street as
Separate counts into three rows: one row vehicles. Count for at least 15 minutes. they cross the imaginary line
3 4 Tally counts
Counting vehicles Pedestrian and cyclist crash rates and fatalities are high
at this location
Count different vehicles types driving Why is this important?
through the project site. It is recommended → To count vehicle volumes by type and movement
to separate counts by direction, especially → To understand movements of taxis, transit,
if there are high volumes. This can be freight, ride-shares, etc.
measured in the middle of a block and at → To compare space distribution by mode
→ To understand if low traffic areas can be
intersections, and the appendix includes
pedestrianized at certain hours, or permanently
forms for both locations. Adjust the tally
counts to the signal phasing, if applicable.
Counting vehicles in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Roadbed New space for bicycles Invisible line surveyed Road users not counted
MEASURING SPEED
What your form could look like: Bosa - Bogotá, Colombia
5
If vehicle volumes are
Motorcycle 37% reduction
too high, divide vehicle
types into multiple Truck 8% reduction
forms to facilitate
data collection
Bus 28% reduction
POP-UP
46%
where people were crossing the street without
Analyze and share metrics at multiple stages throughout the
protected pedestrian facilities. Initial designs had
project’s lifespan to continually assess whether project goals on-street parking spaces that blocked the possibility of people still walking
have been met. Evaluation processes are often most effective for crossings at these locations. on the roadbed
when nuances and observational anecdotes in datasets are
After the data collection process showed 77 people
celebrated and bias towards initial project goals are not limiting
per hour crossing the street at a location between
to opportunities for learning and improvement.
two other new crossings, it became clear that the
distance between the existing crossings was too
proposed new crossing
great to meet the demand, and pedestrians were
Standardize the data that has been collected still at risk. The curb would need to be extended to
accommodate an additional crossing at this location.
Standardize all collected data from different sources into spreadsheets by
the following categories to have accurate data comparisons: Presenting this evidence to the Department of Traffic
Engineering resulted in a quick agreement to do so,
→ Location of data collection point and the parking spaces were relocated elsewhere.
→ Before or after project implementation
→ By day (weekday or weekend, school in session
or not, holiday or working day, etc.)
→ By time (Peak or off-peak hour, morning or evening, etc.)
4 Totals 2
Be open! 9 47ÿ
Separate totals by street ?15ÿ; 5ÿ eJ fJ gJÿ hÿÿ
Stakeholder input and collected data may user type to compare 84 ÿ47?13< fJJÿ# !\J\ i\Jje Ta^
show that the initial expected priority or
F1G51ÿ 843 3
key goal needs to change after deeper
knowledge of the site. Listen and be open
e" =k>lÿ0m 1
to changing gears.
5 Variation over time n 512oÿCA4ÿ=poÿ>l=q
Compare before-and-after iÿXnQTminutes
data to evaluate the impact of
implementations
3621u76ÿ4ÿXÿ!\ÿXÿ# vvw PYY PZL Q K R K
FrsCtr
t 72x12ÿJ!ÿÿ\ÿJÿXÿ]# ww PP K_ T K K K
Note the importance of collecting data
3621u76ÿFÿXÿ!\ÿXÿ# ywl QPT QKT P T R T
at comparable days/times to ensure
6 Project goals met? eJ ^_Q ^ P KY P
comparability of the before/after figures Analyze metrics related to your 9 47ÿ?zÿ; 5 =>{q ==qy =l w {w w
project visions for success to |ÿu7668}ÿ8ÿ4;1ÿ572x12 {~y| QSPM TSTM ^TSTM ^S_M ^TSTM
see if they have been achieved
4G415ÿ 843 3
e" =k>lÿ0m 1
n 512oÿ Dÿ>qoÿ>l=q
iÿXnQTminutes
3621u76ÿ4ÿXÿ!\ÿXÿ# y=l QT^ PRT P P KR Q
4s9rt t 72x12ÿJ!ÿÿ\ÿJÿXÿ]# =w Y Z T T K T
3621u76ÿFÿXÿ!\ÿXÿ# pqq Q_L QYK K K PK T
eJ Z^Y Q Q LT Q
9 47ÿ?zÿ; 5 =w=> ={=w y y ql y
|ÿu7668}ÿ8ÿ4;1ÿ572x12 =~l| KM TM TM QM TM
Example table
30
Before After
25
FREQUENCY (%)
20
15
10
0
10
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
SPEED (km/h)
Raise awareness about Visit the project site before Share immediate impacts! Share key findings,
existing conditions, implementation and share This can be done through impacts, and next steps to
challenges, and the need information about the goals of a combination of the advocate for the success
for the upcoming project. the upcoming project. Present following: and longevity of the
This could be done key challenges and design → Informational posters/ project. This can be shown
through: concepts to stakeholders. This boards through a combination of
→ Blog posts or articles can be done through: → Press releases / media the following:
→ Social media posts → Stakeholder meetings coverage → Long-form blog posts
→ Posters, flyers, and (in-person or virtual) → Social media posts or articles
announcements → Posters, flyers, and → Blog posts or articles → Technical reports
→ Stakeholder meetings announcements → Presentations
(in-person or virtual) → Social media posts
Time-lapse videos
Perception surveys
Use collected data:
Site maps / informational boards
Written/recorded testimonials/interviews/stories
Approximately one month after implementing a 2. Be intentional with justifying the “why” behind 4. Break down new design components and 6. Videos including testimonials from
project in downtown Fortaleza, a blog post was site selection quantify the physical changes made on site stakeholders experiencing the street are an
published with a comprehensive collection of This crashmap, sourced from the City of Fortaleza’s Infographics were created to quickly understand the effective way to show excitement around the
metrics and visual materials that demonstrated police department, helped make the case for the overview of the physical and operational changes new project
how the road safety concerns on the site were specific project site location. of the project design, new user counts, mode share This video is also great to have on hand for
addressed and advocated to make the redesign counts, and changes in speed. These were overlaid meetings with communities and government
permanent. on photos of the new street. officials to quickly and powerfully summarize the
The steps highlighted below break down the The chance that a pedestrian will be project process, experience, and reactions from
different visual components in this long-format struck by a vehicle is 90% higher in the street users.
blog post. downtown core than the rest of the city
References 79
Appendix 80
CORE PROJECT TEAM Abdul Bachani All images used in this handbook are taken by the
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States authors, unless specified below.
Skye Duncan, Director
Fabrizio Prati, Director of Design Adriana Jakovcevic
II Paulo Winz; IV left Cidade Ativa.
Najwa Doughman, Program Manager World Resources Institute (WRI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Kat Gowland, Design Associate Introduction: 1 Cidade Ativa.
Alina Burlacu
Vivi Tiezzi, Program Associate World Bank, Washington DC, United States A Identify where to start: 14 left Paulo Winz; 16
Paulo Winz.
CONTRIBUTORS Anna Nord
NZ Transport Agency (NZTA), Auckland, New Zealand B Measure the impact: 35 left Paulo Winz; 47 top
Abhimanyu Prakash
Juan Paez, bottom right EPMMOP Quito; 63 bottom
Anna Siprikova Beatriz Rodrigues
Hannah Machado; 72 City of Fortaleza crash map;
Annah MacKenzie Bloomberg Initiative for Global Road Safety, Fortaleza, Brazil
75 EPMMOP Quito.
Annie Peyton Bernardo Baranda
Brianna Williams Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP),
Eduarda Aun Mexico City, Mexico
Eduardo Pompeo Martins
Ezequiel Dantas
Francisca Benitez
Vital Strategies, São Paulo, Brazil
Hayrettin Günç
Lucia De La Mora Giovanni Zayas
Majed Abdulsamad World Bank, Puebla, Mexico
Sofie Kvist
Gehl Studio, San Francisco, United States
Yohannes Legesse
City of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia