Annexure C3.2.

The Programme assessment committee (PAC) has reviewed the new procedure for CO-PO mapping
and setting target levels for the attainment of COs and POs, and it is recommended to implement this
procedure from the academic year 2021-22 onwards. The outlined procedure is as follows:

1. Define COs:

Define Course Outcomes (COs) by explicitly articulating the expected learning objectives,
employing Bloom's Taxonomy to categorize each outcome based on cognitive levels.

2. Map COs to both internal and external questions:

Map Course Outcomes (COs) to both internal and external questions by aligning specific COs
with corresponding assessment tools for comprehensive evaluation.

3. Set Target Levels for COs:

While the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) doesn't specify exact attainment levels
within a scale, it has set a minimum requirement of 60%. Given a 3-point scale translating to
percentage ranges

Level 1: 0-49% (weak),

Level 2: 50-79% (moderate),

Level 3: 80-100% (strong)

setting a target of 2 ensures that students meet the moderate requirement (50%) with room
for improvement.

4. COs Attainment:

For performance evaluation, Direct and Indirect Assessment methods are being followed for
Assessment, Evaluation and Measurement of COs.

Direct Assessment (80%): Evaluate Course Outcomes (COs) through coursework, exams, and
projects, conducting CO analysis with a minimum threshold of 60% for each assessment
component.

Indirect Assessment (20%): Assess COs through course exit surveys, program exit surveys,
alumni surveys, and employer surveys.

Combine the results of direct and indirect assessments, assigning an 80/20 weighting to
provide a comprehensive evaluation then Compare combined results against target levels for
each course

5. Map COs to POs and PSOs:

Identify keywords within each Course Outcome (CO), Program Outcome (PO), and Program
Specific Outcome (PSO). Map the keywords of COs with those of POs and PSOs, calculating
the probability based on this mapping. Convert the calculated probability into levels using the
following illustration for your 3-point scale:

Level 1: 0-0.49 (weak)

 Level 2: 0.50-0.75 (moderate)

Level 3: 0.76-1 (strong)

6. Set Target Levels for POs/PSOs

Calculate the average level of mapped Course Outcomes (COs) for each Program Outcome
(PO) and Program Specific Outcome (PSO), and utilize this average as the target level to
achieve for each Program Outcome (PO).

7. POs/PSOs Attainment:

For performance evaluation, Direct and Indirect Assessment methods are being followed for
Assessment, Evaluation and Measurement of POs/PSOs.

Direct Assessment (80%): The combined Course Outcome (CO) values are considered by
weightage based on the mapping strength

Level 1: 60%

Level 2: 80%

Level 3: 100%

Indirect Assessment (20%): Assess COs through course exit surveys, program exit surveys,
alumni surveys, and employer surveys.

Combine the results of direct and indirect assessments, assigning an 80/20 weighting to
provide a comprehensive evaluation then Compare combined results against target levels for
each POs/PSOs

8. Analyze and Evaluate Results:

Evaluate the achieved levels of Course Outcomes (COs) and Program Outcomes
(POs)/Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) to assess the effectiveness of teaching and
assessment methods in achieving the desired outcomes.

9. Identify Areas for Improvement:

Identify and address gaps or areas where attainment levels fall below set targets, specifically
focusing on pinpointing courses or aspects of the program that may require enhancement.

10. Implement Improvement Strategies:

Develop and implement targeted strategies to address identified areas for improvement,
including modifications to instructional methods, assessment approaches, or curriculum
content as needed.

11. Iterate and Adjust:

Continuously monitor and reassess CO-PO attainment over subsequent assessment cycles.
Adjust targets and strategies based on ongoing evaluations and feedback.

12. Communicate Findings:

 Share the results of CO-PO attainment assessments with relevant stakeholders, including
faculty, administrators, and accreditation bodies. Provide insights into strengths and areas for
improvement, fostering transparency and collaboration.

13. Document and Maintain Records:

Keep comprehensive records of CO-PO attainment assessments, targets, and adjustments

made. Maintain a record of strategies implemented and their impact on outcomes over time.

14. Engage in Continuous Improvement:

Embrace a culture of continuous improvement by fostering faculty collaboration, staying

informed about industry trends, and adapting teaching practices accordingly.