Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction:
DEFINITION:
In an attempt to define and describe clinical psychology, J. H. Resnick (1991) proposed the
following definition and description of clinical psychology:
‘ The field of clinical psychology involves research, teaching, and services relevant to the
applications of principles, methods, and procedures for understanding, predicting, and alleviating
intellectual, emotional, biological, psychological, social and behavioral maladjustment, disability
and discomfort, applied to a wide range of client populations’
A more recent definition of clinical psychology appears on the Web page of the APA’s Division
12 (Society of Clinical Psychology)
‘The field of Clinical Psychology integrates science, theory, and practice to understand, predict,
and alleviate maladjustment, disability, and discomfort as well as to promote human adaptation,
adjustment, and personal development. Clinical Psychology focuses on the intellectual,
emotional, biological, psychological, social, and behavioral aspects of human functioning across
the life span, in varying cultures, and at all socioeconomic levels’
TRAINING MODELS
*One can certainly go back to Greek philosophers such as Thales, Hippocrates, or Aristotle who, long
ago, were speculating about human beings and the nature of thought, sensation, and pathology.
*For the years prior to 1890, there is really very little in the history of clinical psychology to separate it
from the history of abnormal psychology.
*Search for the roots of modern clinical psychology in the reform movements of the 19th century, which
ultimately resulted in improved care for the mentally ill. Such improvements, and the humanitarian values
of those who encouraged them, fostered the faint beginnings of the mental health professions as we know
them today
One of the major figures in this movement was Philippe Pinel, a French physician- Morel
therapy- removed chains from patients- Through kindness and humanity- his work was a
milestone in the development of psychiatry, the mental health approach, and ultimately, of
clinical psychology
At about the same time, William Tuke (England), was devoting himself
to the establishment of what might be called a model hospital for the
humane treatment of the sick and troubled.
The essence of clinical psychology has always been its emphasis on assessing
differences, rather than commonalities, among people
. Much of that emphasis can be traced to Francis Galton, an Englishman. Galton devoted
a great deal of effort to the application of quantitative methods to understanding
differences among people. Pursuing his interests in sensory acuity, motor skills, and
reaction time, he established an anthropometric laboratory in 1882
This tradition was furthered by the work of James McKeen Cattell & Lightner Witmer,
both Americans. Despite the disapproval of their mentor, Wilhelm Wundt, James M
Cattell turned his attention to reaction time differences among people while Witmer
became interested in variation in psychological skills among children. Cattell believed
that the study of reaction time differences was a way of approaching the study of
intelligence. Cattell coined the term mental tests to describe his measures.
Lightner Witmer who is known as father of clinical psychology, began
the current model of treatment in clinical psychology by opening the first
psychological clinic in 1896 and starting the first psychological journal,
called The Psychological Clinic.
Through his groundbreaking work identifying and treating children who
experienced educational difficulties (due to cognitive deficits and/or
psychological symptoms), the field of clinical psychology arose as a
profession dedicated towards scientific examination and treatment of
individuals who were unable to function adaptively in their society.
In 1904, Charles Spearman offered the concept of a general intelligence that he termed g. Edward
Thorndike countered with a conceptualization that emphasized the importance of separate abilities.
When the United States entered World War I in 1917, the need arose to screen and classify the
hordes of military recruits being pressed into service
After WWI, a committee of five members from the American Psychological Association
(APA), led by Robert Yerkes, was tasked by the Army Medical Department to create an
ability classification system.
The committee developed the Army Alpha test in 1917, a verbal assessment, followed by the
nonverbal Army Beta test.
In 1917, Robert Woodworth introduced the Psychoneurotic Inventory, one of the first
questionnaires to evaluate abnormal behavior.
Screening tools like Woodworth's Personal Data Sheet, Army Alpha, and Beta tests
contributed to the rise of group testing movement.
Between the two world wars, diagnostic psychological testing advanced significantly.
Notable developments included nonverbal intelligence scales introduced by Pintner and
Paterson.
The 1920s and 1930s saw the emergence of individual and group tests, verbal and
nonverbal tests, and "intelligence quotients."
Aptitude and interest tests like the Seashore musical ability tests and Strong
Vocational Interest Blank gained traction.
Theoretical debates on intelligence were fueled by contributions from Spearman,
Thorndike, and Thurstone.
Major developments included the publication of the Wechsler-Bellevue test in 1939, a
milestone for adult intelligence testing.
Personality testing also progressed with Woodworth's Personal Data Sheet and
projective testing, notably Rorschach's inkblot test.
The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and Bender-Gestalt test furthered the
projective movement in the 1930s.
Interventions
-Scientist-Practitioner Model:
Originated from the 1949 Boulder conference, it's the dominant training approach for
clinical psychologists.
.The Boulder model, also known as the scientist-practitioner model, saw a profession
comprised of skilled practitioners who could produce their own research as well as
consume the research of others.
A response to the perceived gap between clinical practice and research in early clinical
psychology.
Aims to blend scientific inquiry and clinical practice.
Aims to create skilled practitioners who also contribute to clinical knowledge through
research.
Focuses on thinking like a scientist in clinical activities, evaluating progress
scientifically, and using evidence-based treatments.
Practitioners evaluate clients' progress scientifically and choose treatments based on
empirical evidence.
Applies to clinical researchers who need to maintain clinical skills, and practitioners who
should keep research training.
Psy.D. Degree:
Emerged due to a focus on clinical skills and less emphasis on research compared to
Ph.D. programs.
Developed at the University of Illinois in 1968 and spread to other schools.
Psy.D. programs prioritize clinical experience and therapeutic practice in the later years.
Over 60 accredited clinical psychology doctoral programs offer Psy.D., with increasing
degree awards.
Early concerns about Psy.D. Graduates' employability compared to Ph.D. graduates have
proven unfounded.
Differences between Psy.D and Ph.D. programs include higher acceptance rates for
Psy.D, fewer faculty with cognitive-behavioral orientation in Psy.D programs, and
shorter completion time for Psy.D. degrees.
- Psy.D. programs continue to have higher acceptance rates, enrollments, and degree awards
compared to Ph.D. programs.
Professional Schools:
A radical departure from tradition, these schools are independent and offer degrees like
the Psy.D.
Often "freestanding" and focused on clinical functions, they have limited research
training and clinical-oriented faculty.
California School of Professional Psychology was the first freestanding school, now
known as Alliant International University.
In 1987, there were 45 such schools, awarding hundreds of clinical doctorates. Today,
over 60% of clinical psychology doctorates are awarded by professional schools.
These schools admit more students, but their stability depends on tuition and part-time
faculty.
Many professional schools lack full APA accreditation.
The future of professional schools remains uncertain due to funding and accreditation
challenges.
Changes in training reflected marketplace trends, shifting from academic jobs to private
practice.
Criticisms of scientist-practitioner model emerged due to perceived inadequacy for
future practitioners.
Alternative training models like Psy.D. and professional schools gained influence from
the Vail Training Conference.
Some argue for designating clinical psychologists practicing with a Psy.D. degree.
Trends may impact training models' viability and success.
Oversupply of practice-oriented psychologists might affect student enrollments.
Internship positions have become competitive, especially for practice-oriented
programs.
Managed health care changes will emphasize empirically supported interventions and
assessment.
Programs lacking relevant faculty expertise may produce graduates with inadequate
skills for the market.
Potential undersupply of academic and research-oriented clinical psychologists.
Scientist-practitioner and clinical scientist programs could better meet the need for
research-oriented professionals.
Professional Regulation:
a) Certification:
Ensuring competence as clinical psychology grew.
Public's inability to distinguish trained professionals led to professional regulation.
Certification, weaker form of regulation, restricts use of the title "psychologist" without
certification.
Certification's weakness: Doesn't stop uncertified people from offering services as long
as they avoid the title.
- Certification laws often arose from effective psychiatric lobbying.
b) Licensing,
It is a stronger legislation than certification, specifies title, training, and allowable fee-
based activities.
Licensing prevents evasion by defining and designating certain practices.
Licensing and certification vary from state to state due to lack of national standard.
To help strengthen this system of oversight and consumer protection, the American
Psychological Association developed a model act for the licensure of psychologists
(e.g., American Psychological Association, 1987b). More recent revisions were
published in 2001 by the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards
(ASPPB, http:// www.asppb.org/) and in 2010 by the American Psychological
Association.
Current challenges related to licensure include establishing a national standard for licensure (which
will allow easier mobility from state to state or province to province), deciding whether or not an oral
examination is necessary in addition to a written examination, and addressing licensing issues related
to tele health and distance practice over the Internet (Rehm & DeMers, 2006)
American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP):
National Register:
In 1975, the first National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology was
published
Reflects growing recognition of clinical psychologists as competent providers.
Register serves as self-certification for practitioners and aligns with insurance coverage
trends.
Along with the increasing numbers of clinicians in private practice and their recognition
as health care providers by insurance and managed care companies, the Register is one
more indication of the growing professionalism of clinical psychology.
Private practice:
US health care costs are high, with spending exceeding GDP percentages and per capita
amounts compared to other nations (WHO).
- In 2009, the US spent around $2.5 trillion on health care, about $8,086 per person,
accounting for 17.6% of GDP (CMS).
Projections suggest health care costs could rise to 19.6% of GDP by 2019.
Managed care emerged as an attempt to control high health care costs, particularly
mental health care costs.
Managed care involves selective provider networks, evaluating service appropriateness
and effectiveness, and quality improvement programs.
The approach shifted economic control from practitioners to payers like employers,
emphasizing cost containment.
Managed care models include HMOs, PPOs, and POSs.
Managed care's impact on mental health services and costs is significant (Kiesler &
Morton, 1988)
Prescription privileges
Over the last two decades, a hotly debated issue concerns the pursuit of prescription
privileges (sometimes called “prescriptive authority”) for clinical psychologists
Although the American Psychological Association endorsed this pursuit in 1995, many
remain either neutral or adamantly opposed to obtaining prescription privileges.
The decision to pursue these privileges will have far-reaching implications for the role
definition of clinical psychologists, the training they require, and their actual practice.
Pros:
A number of arguments have been made in favor of seeking prescription privileges
First, having prescription privileges would enable clinical psychologists to provide a
wider variety of treatments and to treat a wider range of clients or patients. Treatment
involving medications would now be an option, and this would lead to more
involvement by clinical psychologists in the treatment of conditions in which
medications are the primary form of intervention (e.g., schizophrenia). A second
advantage of having prescription privileges is the potential increase in efficiency and
cost-effectiveness of care for patients who need both psychological treatment and
medicationThere is also the belief that prescription privileges will give clinical
psychologists a competitive advantage in the health care marketplace
Cons.
Other clinical psychologists have voiced concerns about the possibility of obtaining
prescription privileges (Albee, 2002; Hayes & Heiby, 1996; Heiby, 2002). These critics
point out that prescription privileges may lead to a de-emphasis of “psychological”
forms of treatment because medications are often faster acting and potentially more
profitable than psychotherapy. Many fear that a conceptual shift may occur, with
biological explanations of emotional conditions taking precedence over psychological
ones. The pursuit of prescription privileges may also damage clinical psychology’s
relationship with psychiatry and general medicine. Such conflict may result in
financially expensive lawsuits. Also many fear that psychologists’ ability to prescribe
medications would lead to more drugcompany-sponsored research.
Implications for Training:
- The American Psychological Association's Ad Hoc Task Force on
Psychopharmacology outlined three levels of competence and training in psycho-
pharmacology for psychologists providing medication-related services (Smyer et al.,
1993).
Level 1: Basic Pharmacology Training, which involves a one-semester survey course in
psychopharmacology to understand medication classes and substances of abuse.
Level 2: Collaborative Practice, requiring in-depth knowledge of psychopharmacology,
diagnostic assessment, drug interactions, physical assessment, and practical training.
Level 3: Prescription Privileges, for independent prescribing psychologists. It
necessitates a strong background in biological sciences, graduate training in
psychopharmacology, and a postdoctoral psychopharmacology residency.
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS
Technology has influenced many fields, and clinical psychology is no exception. In this
section, we discuss several recent technological innovations that are likely to have a lasting
impact on clinical psychology.
Telehealth:
Advantages to telehealth:
Computer-assisted therapy
Cultural competence
Clinical psychologists must actively develop skills to achieve cultural competence in their
work with various groups of clients or patients. Sue (1998) has identified three major
characteristics of cultural competence:
■ Scientific-mindedness. Clinicians must formulate and test hypotheses regarding the status
of their culturally different clients; clinicians must not adhere to the “myth of sameness.”
■ Culture-specific expertise. Clinicians must understand their own culture and perspectives,
have knowledge of the cultural groups with whom they work, and if indicated, be able to use
culturally informed intervention
Use treatment interventions that have been shown to be effective with girls and
women.
Be sensitive to the issue of sex bias when conducting assessment and formulating a
diagnosis.
Become familiar with and utilize community resources for girls and women during
treatment
What Future Practicing Clinical Psychologists Need to Know?
Here we list several key areas of knowledge that seem especially relevant to future practicing
clinical psychologists:
Knowledge of new and evolving health care delivery systems such as managed care
organizations (MCOs).
2. Sensitivity to ethical issues relevant to managed care settings, including confidentiality and
informed consent.
3. Experience in multidisciplinary environments, such as medical settings.
4. Managed-care-relevant clinical skills, including brief interventions, treatment team
approach, and focused assessment.
5. Expertise in “applied” research, such as program evaluation, cost-effectiveness, and
medical cost offset.
6. Management and business skills—for example, contracts, utilization review, marketing.
7. Technology such as computers, databases, and telemedicine.
8. Empirically supported and evidenced-based practices (EBPs) in clinical assessment and
intervention.
9. Training in supervision; it is likely that fewer clinical psychologists will be directly
delivering services in the future.
10. Sensitivity to cultural differences and knowledge of empirical findings concerning EBPs
appropriate for ethnic subgroups.
Although these general principles are not technically enforceable rules, they serve to guide
psychologists’ actions. The specific ethical standards, however, are enforceable rules of conduct
Competence :It is an ethical principle that calls upon psychologists to recognize the
boundaries of their professional expertise and to keep up-to-date on information
relevant to the services they provide.
Confidentiality: An ethical principle that calls upon psychologists to respect and
protect the information shared with them by clients, disclosing this information only
when they have obtained the client’s consent (except in extraordinary cases in which
failing to disclose the information would place the client or others at clear risk for
harm).
Human Relations : Dual relationships pose many ethical questions regarding client
welfare. Sexual activities with clients, employing a client, selling a product to a client,
or even becoming friends with a client after the termination of therapy are all behaviors
that can easily lead to exploitation of and harm to the client. Although perhaps not very
common, such events are clearly troublesome to the profession. Sexual liaisons can be
equally damaging in supervisory relationships.
Areas of specialization
Forensic psychology
Forensic psychology involves the application of the science and profession of
psychology to issues relating to law and the legal profession (ABFP, 2006).
. A variety of settings and clients may be involved, including children and adolescents as
well as adults. All manner of institutions, including corporations, government agencies,
universities, hospitals and clinics, and correctional facilities, may be involved as clients
or objects of testimony involves understanding fundamental legal principles, particularly
with regard to expert witness testimony and the specific content area of concern, e.g.,
competence to stand trial, child custody and visitation, or workplace discrimination, as
well as relevant jurisdictional considerations etc.
• Consultation to law enforcement including working with judicial system and counselling
services through mediation centres etc.
• Expert witness
• Trial consultation
• Psychotherapeutic management
Community psychology
The field grew out of the community mental health movement, but evolved dramatically as
early practitioners incorporated their understandings of political structures and other
community contexts into perspectives on client services.
community psychology is a psychological approach that emphasizes the role of
environmental forces in creating and alleviating problems. Community psychology is
preventive rather than remedial in orientation. Furthermore, it attends to the fit between the
person and the environment (rather than the inadequacies of either) and focuses on
identifying and developing the strengths and resources of people and communities.
• What “causes” problems? Problems develop due to an interaction over time between the
individual, social setting, and systems (e.g., organizations); these exert a mutual influence
on each other.
• How are problems defined? Problems can be defined at many levels, but particular
emphasis is placed on analysis at the level of the organization and the community or
neighborhood.
• How are services planned? Rather than providing services only for those who seek help,
community psychologists proactively assess the needs and risks in a community.
• Who is qualified to intervene? Attempts are made to share psychology with others via
consultation; actual interventions are often carried out through self-help programs or
through trained nonpsychologists/nonprofessionals.
• Social justice
Behavioral medicine
Behavioral medicine basically refers to the integration of the behavioral sciences with the
practice and science of medicine. Matarazzo (1980) uses the term to refer to the broad
interdisciplinary field of scientific investigation, education, and practice that is concerned
with health, illness, and related physiological dysfunctions.
The practice of behavioral medicine encompasses health psychology, but also includes
applied psychophysiological therapies such as biofeedback, hypnosis, and bio-behavioral
therapy of physical disorders, aspects of occupational therapy, rehabilitation medicine, as
well as preventive medicine.
It focuses on
The practice of behavioural medicine is being done in general hospital setting and also in
private practice. Main departments are Medicine, Oncology, Cardiology, Pediatrics,
Neurology/ Neurosciences etc
Neuropsychology
It can be defined as the study of the relation between brain function and behaviour or the study
of how complex properties of the brain allow behavior to occur
It deals with the understanding, assessment, and treatment of behaviours directly related to the
functioning of the brain (Golden, 1984).
• In India the field is growing is fast space. The practice of neuropsychology is mainly
related to clinical neuropsychology focusing on neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Health Psychology
• It is the study of psychological and behavioral processes in health, illness, and healthcare.
• Prevention of illness
• Health Psychology is being practiced in general hospital setting and community setting.
Various departments of Psychology including University of Calcutta are involved in
providing training.