Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Heliyon
journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon

Effect of Metarhizium anisopliae (MetA1) on growth enhancement

and antioxidative defense mechanism against Rhizoctonia root rot
in okra
Afsana Akter Mimma a, Tanjina Akter a, Md. Ashraful Haque a,
Md. Abdullahil Baki Bhuiyan b, Md. Zahid Hasan Chowdhury a, Sharmin Sultana a,
Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam a, *
a
Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh
b
Department of Plant Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Rhizoctonia solani is an important necrotrophic pathogenic fungus that causes okra root disease
Metarhizium anisopliae and results in severe yield reduction. Many biocontrol agents are being studied with the intent of
Okra improving plant growth and defense systems and reducing crop loss by preventing fungal in­
Rhizoctonia solani
fections. Recently, a member of the Hypocrealean family, Metarhizium anisopliae, has been re­
Biological control
Antioxidant enzyme activities
ported for insect pathogenicity, endophytism, plant growth promotion, and antifungal
potentialities. This research investigated the role of M. anisopliae (MetA1) in growth promotion
and root disease suppression in okra. The antagonism against R. solani and the plant growth
promotion traits of MetA1 were tested in vitro. The effects of endophytic MetA1 on promoting
plant growth and disease suppression were assessed in planta. Dual culture and cell-free culture
filtrate assays showed antagonistic activity against R. solani by MetA1. Some plant growth pro­
motion traits, such as phosphate solubilization and catalase activity were also exhibited by
MetA1. Seed primed with MetA1 increased the shoot, root, leaves, chlorophyll content, and
biomass content compared to control okra plants. The plants challenged with R. solani showed the
highest hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and lipid peroxidation (MDA) contents in the leaves of okra.
Whereas MetA1 applied plants showed a reduction of H2O2 and MDA by 5.21 and 14.96%,
respectively, under pathogen-inoculated conditions by increasing antioxidant enzyme activities,
including catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and ascorbate
peroxidase (APX), by 30.11, 10.19, 5.62, and 5.06%, respectively. Moreover, MetA1 increased
soluble sugars, carbohydrates, proline, and secondary metabolites, viz., phenol and flavonoid
contents in okra resulting in a better osmotic adjustment of diseases infecting plants. MetA1
reduced disease incidence by 58.33% at 15 DAI compared to the R. solani inoculated plant. The
results revealed that MetA1 improved plant growth, elevated the plant defense system, and
suppressed root diseases caused by R. solani. Thus, MetA1 was found to be an effective candidate
for the biological control program.

* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: naimul@bsmrau.edu.bd (S.M.N. Islam).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18978
Received 23 March 2023; Received in revised form 26 July 2023; Accepted 3 August 2023
Available online 12 August 2023
2405-8440/© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

1. Introduction

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.), belongs to the Malvaceae family and is an important vegetable produced worldwide in tropical
and subtropical climes [1]. It has around 90% water, 2% protein, 7% carbohydrate, 1.2% sugar, 3.2% fiber, 0.1% fat, and trace
amounts of minerals [2]. Okra production is, however, restricted by many abiotic and biotic stresses in tropical areas. Significant biotic
stresses are the main barrier to producing optimum okra yield [3]. Plant pathogens and insect pests are the factors limiting the quality
and quantity of okra production, with total losses of roughly 35–40% globally [4]. Root rot, charcoal rot, Fusarium wilt, powdery
mildew, southern blight, and the yellow vein mosaic virus are the most prevalent ailments that affect okra [5,6]. Among them, root rot
diseases cause several economic losses and are a serious problem in many areas, including Bangladesh [7].
Rhizoctonia solani is a serious soil-borne pathogen that causes root rot, stem canker, and pre- and post-emergence damping-off in
both agricultural and horticultural crops. R. solani was responsible for the prevalence of root rots, which caused losses of 10–80% in
various vegetables [5]. The fungus R. solani exists as active mycelium in soil that is adapted to withstand harsh environmental con­
ditions for prolonged periods. It causes the root rot disease complex, which kills plants, by infecting their roots and restricting plant
nutrition intake [8]. In response to R. solani infection, plants produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a defense mechanism. The
highest ROS levels were detected in plants when R. solani initiated sclerotia production [9]. ROS may operate as second messengers,
activating several defenses and scavengers of active oxygen species such as catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase
(APX), and Glutathione-S-transferase (GST), all of which decrease the oxidative burst and prevent tissue necrotization [10].
Numerous techniques, including chemical insecticides, nanomaterials, and biological control agents (BCAs), are used to control
pathogen infections and decrease crop loss [11,12]. Among them, the use of beneficial fungi and bacteria as BCA is a potential strategy
for plant disease control [13,14]. In comparison to chemical pesticides, they do less damage by lowering the chemical risk in the
environment. Moreover, BCAs promote plant growth by supplying nutrients and increasing water absorption through altering root
morphology and/or rhizosphere interaction [15]. BCAs may also develop resistance to infections by activating hormone-mediated
(salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and strigolactones) plant-defense mechanisms, and they fulfill the needs of commercial markets for
maximum chemical residue limitations on fruits and vegetables [15–17].
Trichoderma, arbuscular mycorrhizae, ectomycorrhiza, endophytes, yeasts, and avirulent/hypovirulent strains of certain pathogens
are examples of BCA fungi [12,18–20]. The entomopathogenic hypocrealean fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokin is found
to be very efficient against a range of insect pests, such as ticks, locusts, thrips, and whiteflies [21]. In recent times, the endophytic
functions of Metarhizium species have been identified, and their involvement in promoting plant growth and mitigating plant diseases
has been documented [21]. Several studies have shown that M. anisopliae can colonize the roots of different crops and increase the
growth of Arabidopsis, tomato, haricot, bean, cassava, and maize [22–26]. For example, the isolates of M. brunneum, M. anisopliae, and
M. robertsii showed rhizosphere competency and the ability to stimulate the growth of wheat, corn, and onion, when applied as seed
treatments [27]. In addition, Metarhizium spp. produce secondary metabolites that have a range of insecticidal, anticancer, antioxi­
dant, and antibacterial effects. M. anisopliae showed antifungal activities against the gray mold fungus Botrytis cinerea in tomatoes [21].
Root-colonized wheat plants with M. anisopliae exhibited dual functions, which involved promoting the growth of wheat and sup­
pressing the occurrence of Fusarium head blight disease [20].
It was evident from a previous study that the expression of the M. anisopliae chitinase gene CHIT42 in tobacco confirmed resistance
against R. solani [28]. However, no effort was made to employ Metarhizium spp. against Rhizoctonia root rot disease as a BCA.
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the role of MetA1 in okra growth promotion and root disease suppression caused by
R. solani and elucidate its role in enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidative defense systems in okra.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental materials

Fungus strain M. anisopliae isolate MetA1 (NCBI accession OQ581920) from our culture collection, and pathogen Rhizoctonia solani
were used as experimental fungal isolates. Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) variety ‘Okra F1’ (a commercial variety) was used as a host
plant throughout the experiment. The experiment was conducted in the net house during March–May 2021 (Okra growing season in
Bangladesh).

2.2. Antagonistic activity of MetA1 against R. solani

2.2.1. Dual culture assay

Mycelial disks (5 mm in diameter) were cut from the developing edge of a 4-day-old colony of MetA1 and R. solani and put in
opposing directions on the edge of a PDA plate. PDA plates amended with Provax-200 (carboxin 5,6-dihydro-2-methyl-1,4-oxathin-3-
carboxamide) at a concentration of 200 ppm were included as a positive control. The PDA plates without fungicidal treatment or
MetA1 inoculation were used as negative controls. The infected plates were kept in an incubator at 28 ◦ C. The diameter of the fungal
radial development in dual cultures was measured after five days when R. solani plates in negative controls had filled the plate. Using
the method shown by Rajendiran et al. [29], the percent inhibition (PI) of the mycelial growth of R. solani caused by the fungal
antagonistic activity over the control was computed from three replications.

2
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

X− Y
% Inhibition of growth, L = × 100
Y

Where, L = Per cent inhibition of radial growth of pathogen (%)

X = Radial growth of the pathogen (mm) in control.
Y = Radial growth of the pathogen (mm) in treatment.

2.2.2. Culture filtrate assay

The cell-free culture (CFC) filtrates of MetA1 were further evaluated for antifungal activity against R. solani isolate. MetA1 was
cultured in potato dextrose broth (PDB) for five days on a shaker at 120 rpm at 25 ± 2 ◦ C. The broth was filtered through two layers of
Whatman filter No. 1, and the supernatants were collected. The collected supernatants were passed through 0.22 μm membrane filters.
A volume of 100 μl CFC filtrates was added to the autoclaved PDA medium at rates of 25, 50, 75, and 100%. PDA plates amended with
Provax-200 @200 ppm were included as a positive check. Mycelial plugs of R. solani isolate from actively growing margins were
transferred onto Petri dishes and incubated at 28 ◦ C for five days in an incubator. The inhibition percentage of the test pathogen was
calculated as described previously from three replications.

2.3. Characterization of MetA1 for plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol traits

2.3.1. Determination of phosphate solubilization activity

Slightly modified Pikovskaya’s agar medium (for 1 L,10g glucose,5g Ca3(PO4)2,0.5g (NH4)2SO4,0.2g NaCl, 0.1g MgSO4.7H2O,0.2g
KCl,0.5g yeast extract, 0.002g MnSO4.H2O,0.002 g FeSO4.7H2O, and 15g agar) was used for the detection of phosphate solubilization
activity. The medium was aseptically transferred to Petri dishes and inoculated with a 5 mm agar disc cut from a 5-day-old MetA1
culture and incubated at 25 ± 2 ◦ C in darkness for 3–5 days [30]. The formation of a clear halo zone around the colony indicates
phosphate solubilization activity.

2.3.2. Catalase test

The catalase test was done following the method of Reiner [31]. The MetA1 was inoculated on a PDA medium and incubated at 25
± 2 ◦ C for 2 days. A needle was used to transfer the fungus from the culture plate to a clean slide containing one drop of 3% H2O2. The
formation of copious bubbles by breaking down the hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen indicated the presence of catalase.

2.4. Pot experiment

2.4.1. Seed priming

Spores of MetA1 were collected from 5-day-old fungal culture and suspended in a Tween-80 (0.05%) solution. Healthy okra seeds
were surface sterilized for 15 min with 1% (v/v) NaOCl, rinsed thoroughly 3 times with sterile distilled water, and dried under laminar
airflow on sterile paper. Dry okra seeds were dipped in 50 μl of spore suspension (1 × 105 spores ml− 1) for 24 h for seed priming. For
the untreated control, seeds were dipped in a Tween-80 (0.05%) solution.

2.4.2. Seed sowing

Field soil (sandy loam, PH 6.38, 18% organic carbon, 1.07% organic matter, 0.07% N, 0.01% P, and 0.40% K) was used as the
growth medium. The soil was autoclaved twice at 24-h intervals at 121 ◦ C and 15 psi for 20 min. MetA1-treated and non-treated okra
seeds were sown in plastic pots, maintaining uniform spacing. The plants were kept in a net house and regularly watered.

2.4.3. Preparation of R. solani inoculum

The R. solani inoculum was prepared following the modified methods described in Bhuiyan et al. [32]. The wheat grain was boiled
for 20 min, then cooled and poured into a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask, sealed with a cotton plug, and autoclaved. Ten mycelial discs of
three-day-old R. solani culture were cut from the edge, transferred into each flask and mixed with the autoclaved wheat grains on a
clean bench. Then, flasks were incubated at 25 ± 2 ◦ C for 15 days. At 2–3 days intervals all the grains were shaken and incorporated for
uniform distribution of fungal mycelia. The colonized wheat grain was air-dried and stored at 4 ◦ C for future use.

2.4.4. Inoculation of R. solani and plant culture

After 15 days of plant growth, the soil was thoroughly mixed with R. solani colonized wheat grain inoculum with an equal amount
(100 g) in pathogen treated pots with or without MetA1. Soils of control and only MetA1 colonized pots were mixed with an equal
amount of autoclaved wheat grains. Thus, the experiment comprised the following treatments: i) Control: neither MetA1 nor R. solani;
ii) MetA1: M. anisopliae inoculated; iii) R. S: R. solani treated; and iv) MetA1 + R. solani: plant received both MetA1 and R. solani. Water
was applied to the plants on alternate days.

2.5. Determinations

2.5.1. Plant growth parameters

After 28 days after inoculation (DAI), the plants were carefully uprooted and washed. Then, a range of plant growth parameters,

3
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

such as shoot length, dry and fresh shoot weight, root length, dry and fresh root weight, leaf diameter, and number of fully grown
leaflets, were estimated.

2.5.2. Root colonization confirmation

The plant root colonization by MetA1 was confirmed by the visual observation of characteristic mycelial growth in root sections
cultured on SDAY medium with antibiotics as per the method described by Parsa et al. [33].

2.5.3. Photosynthetic pigments

In situ leaf chlorophyll content was determined by measuring the SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) value (SPAD-502,
Minolta Co. Ltd. Japan) weekly, starting one week after pathogen inoculation and continuing until four weeks. Each SPAD value was
the average of 10 readings (5 on each side of the leaf midrib) [34]. Chlorophylls (Chl a, Chl b, and total chlorophyll) and carotenoids’
contents were estimated spectrophotometrically from the 3rd fully expanded leaf sample during harvest using the method described by
Porra et al. [35]. Chlorophylls: Chl a, Chl b, and total chlorophylls and carotenoids contents were estimated from the 3rd fully
expanded leaf sample using the method described by Porra et al. [35].

2.5.4. Proline content, total carbohydrate (CHO), and total soluble sugar (TSS)
Fully expanded 3rd leaf samples were collected, and proline was extracted and determined using the proline standard series using
the method described by Bates et al. [36]. Total carbohydrate contents and total soluble sugar (TSS) in okra leaf tissues were estimated
according to the methods proposed by Dubois et al. [37].

2.5.5. Total phenolic and flavonoid content

Total phenolic and flavonoid contents in okra leaf tissues were estimated according to the methods of Ainsworth and Gillespie [38]
and Zhishen et al. [39]. In summary, 0.1g of okra leaf was homogenized with 1.5 ml of 99.8% methanol before centrifugation at 13,
000 rpm for 20 min at 4 ◦ C. After that, the same supernatant was used to determine total phenolic and total flavonoid content using
various techniques. To calculate total phenolic, 0.2 ml of 10% (0.2 N) Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent was mixed with 0.4 ml of supernatant
and left at room temperature for 15 min. After that, 0.8 mL of 700 Mm Na2CO3 solution was added to this solution and allowed to stand
at room temperature for 2 h. Lastly, the absorbance was measured using a Shimadzu UV 1800 at 765 nm. To quantify flavonoids, 0.4
mL of supernatant was mixed with 0.2 mL of 5% sodium nitrite, 0.3 mL of 10% AlCl3.6H2O, and 1.5 mL of 1 M NaOH. A vortex machine
was used to thoroughly mix the mixture. Finally, absorbance at 510 nm was measured.

2.6. H2O2 and membrane lipid peroxidation (MDA)

H2O2 was estimated according to the method described by Yu et al. [40]. Briefly, 0.5 g of leaf samples were homogenized in 3 mL of
50 mM K–P buffer (pH 6.5) at 4 ◦ C and the homogenate was centrifuged at 11,500×g for 15 min. Three mL of the supernatants were
combined with 1 mL of 0.1% TiCl4 in 20% H2SO4 (v/v) and kept at room temperature for 10 min. After that, the mixture was
centrifuged once again at 11,500×g for 15 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was read at 410 nm for calculating H2O2 content
using an extinction coefficient of 0.28 μM− 1cm− 1. The level of membrane lipid peroxidation was measured by estimating malon­
dialdehyde (MDA), following the method proposed by Heath and Packer [41].

2.7. Antioxidants enzymes activities

For enzyme activity analysis, leaf samples (0.5 g/sample) were crushed in 1 mL of 50 mM ice-cold K–P buffer (pH 7.0), which
comprised potassium chloride (100 mM), ascorbate (AsA, 1 mM), β-mercaptoethanol (5 mM), and glycerol (10%; v/v). Homogenized
plant material was centrifuged at 11,500×g for 12 min38, and the supernatant was collected for enzyme activity estimation [42].
The catalase activity was measured following the method of Hasanuzzaman et al. [43] by monitoring the reduction in absorbance at
240 nm after 1 min due to H2O2 breakdown. The peroxidase activity was assessed according to the method described by Hemed and
Klein [44]. The ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase activities were determined using the spectrophotometric method
proposed by Hasanuzzaman et al. [43].

2.8. Disease incidence

To estimate disease incidence, the okra seeds were grown in seeding trays under similar experimental conditions where every
treatment was replicated four times and each replication contained ten plants. After 20 days of plant growth, the soil was inoculated
with R. solani inoculum following the method described above. The disease incidence was recorded by counting the number of plants
that showed typical symptoms, i.e., stem or root lesions [45], after 15 days after inoculation (DAI). The following formula was used to
calculate the percent disease incidence:
Xi
Disease incidence (%) = × 100
X
Where, Xi = Number of infected plants, and X = Total Number of plants.

4
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

2.9. Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was conducted through a factorial design using the Statistics 10 software. The means of different
treatments were compared using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at a significance level of 5%. Additionally, simple data
analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010.

3. Results

3.1. MetA1 showed antagonism against R. solani in dual culture assay

In dual culture assays, the endophytic fungus MetA1 inhibited the growth of the virulent pathogenic fungus R. solani (Fig. 1A–C).
The fungus MetA1 isolate showed antagonistic activity at 1, 3, and 5 DAI by inhibiting radial growth and reducing the mycelial growth
of R. solani (Fig. 1D). The radial growth of R. solani against MetA1 (7.01 ± 0.10 mm) was significantly lower than the control (25.03 ±
0.02 mm) at 1 day after inoculation (DAI), and the percent of growth reduction was observed at 72.04%. Likewise, the radial growth of
R. solani against MetA1 (11.46 ± 0.07 mm) was significantly lower than the control (37.11 ± 0.11 mm) at 3 DAI, and the percent of
growth reduction was 68.7%. Similarly, the radial growth of R. solani against MetA1 (16.68 ± 0.12 mm) was significantly lower than
the control (48 ± 0.03 mm) at 5 DAI, and the percent inhibition was 65% (Fig. 1D).

3.2. Culture filtrates of MetA1 inhibited R. solani growth in vitro

The cell-free filtrates of MetA1 showed effective antagonism activities against the test pathogen and significantly inhibited the
mycelial growth of R. solani at all four concentrations compared to the treated control (Fig. 2). The growth inhibition of the test
pathogen at 25, 50, 75, and 100% concentrations was 55.18, 66.09, 80.27, and 88.20%, respectively, compared to the negative control
on the seventh day after inoculation.

3.3. MetA1 showed plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol traits

The fungus MetA1 showed strong phosphate solubilization activity in Pikovskaya’s (PVSK) agar medium (Fig. 3A). In the quali­
tative estimation of phosphate solubilization, MetA1 showed a clear zone on modified agar after incubation at room temperature for
0–7 days. The enzyme assay also showed strong catalase activity by MetA1 by reacting with hydrogen peroxide and forming copious
bubbles (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 1. Antagonistic activities of MetA1 against R. solani in dual culture assays. (A) Inhibition of mycelial growth of R. solani by M. anisopliae in dual
culture method at 5 DAI. (B) Growth of R. solani. (C) Antagonistic activity of M. anisopliae against R. solani observed under microscope. (D) In vitro,
antagonistic activities of M. anisopliae against R. solani in dual culture assays. Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter above the bars
show statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani.

5
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 2. Inhibition of mycelial growth of R. solani at different concentrations of cell-free culture filtrate of MetA1. Values (means ± SEs) with
different alphabetical letter above the bars show statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R.
S, R. solani.

Fig. 3. (A) Phosphate solubilization assay of MetA1 in pikovskaya’s agar media exhibited strong phosphate solubilize activity and (B) MetA1
exhibited catalase reaction by MetA1 (M. anisopliae).

3.4. MetA1 improved shoot, root, and leaf growth in okra

Application of MetA1 in okra showed improved phenotypic appearance by increasing shoot, root, and leaf growth both with and
without pathogen conditions (Fig. 4A–C). MetA1-inoculated plants exhibited significantly higher shoot length (5.30%), root length
(18.96%), shoot fresh weight (7.48%), root fresh weight (7.56%), shoot dry weight (16.77%), and leaf area (30.45%) as compared to
respective control plants (Table 1).
Whereas pathogen (R. solani) inoculation in plants reduced shoot length (1.87%), root length (7.16%), shoot fresh weight
(16.88%), root fresh weight (21.30%), shoot dry weight (27.37%), and leaf area (11.47%) as compared to respective untreated control
plants (Table 1). Under pathogen conditions, MetA1-inoculated plants (MetA1+R. solani) exhibited significantly higher shoot length
(4.60%), root length (13%), shoot fresh weight (13.25%), root fresh weight (10.8%), shoot dry weight (31.94%), and leaf area
(22.24%) as compared to only R. solani inoculated plants, respectively (Table 1).
In addition, MetA1-inoculated plants exhibited significantly higher leaf fresh weight (20.41%), leaf dry weight (12.61%), leaf
number (13.09%), plant height (8.38%), stem diameter (1.69%), full-grown leaf (8.10%), and root dry weight (10.50%) as compared
to respective control plants shown in Table 1. In R. solani inoculation, plants had reduced leaf fresh weight (9.84%), leaf dry weight
(24.31%), leaf number (8.33%), plant height (6.35%), stem diameter (16.73%), full-grown leaf (19.67%), and root dry weight
(13.44%) as compared to respective untreated control plants (Table 1). Under pathogen conditions, MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants
exhibited significantly higher leaf fresh weight (15.12%), leaf dry weight (10.65%), leaf number (6.49%), plant height (11.20%), stem
diameter (12.73%), full-grown leaf (6.12%), and root dry weight (5.82%) as compared to R. solani inoculated plants (Table 1).

6
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 4. Effects of MetA1 on morphological appearance of the okra plants in a pot experiment. (A) Growth responses of okra plants in different
treatments, (B) root morphology, and (C) leaves appearance of okra plants. Where, Control- (without any treatment), Met A1- (M. anisopliae
inoculation), R.S- R. solani inoculation (treated control), and Met A1+ R.S- (M. anisopliae + R. solani inoculation).

3.5. MetA1 improved SPAD chlorophyll value and photosynthetic pigments

The fungus MetA1 inoculation in okra showed significant improvement in the SPAD chlorophyll value after pathogen infection
(Fig. 5). The total SPAD values of the MetA1-inoculated plants in four weeks were significantly higher (11.65, 8.55, 8.0, and 14.22%)
as compared to control untreated plants, respectively. Whereas the four weeks’ data showed that, the SPAD values were reduced
(18.12, 24.04, 28.64, and 31.23%) in R.S. inoculated plants as compared to untreated controls, respectively (Fig. 5). In biotic stress
conditions, MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited significantly higher values (9.64, 24.04, 26.46, and 31.65%) as compared to
the respective R. solani-inoculated plants at five time points (Fig. 5).
The estimated photosynthetic data showed that MetA1-treated plants increased chlorophyll a (chl a), chlorophyll b (chl b), total
chlorophylls (chls), and carotenoid contents compared to untreated control plants (Fig. 6A–D). The increased amounts of chl a, chl b,
chls, and carotenoids were observed in plants treated with the endophytic MetA1 strain by 2.92, 2.80, 2.87, and 2.5%, respectively, as
compared to their untreated control plants. In stress conditions, R. solani inoculated plants decreased chl a, chl b, total chls, and ca­
rotenoids by 8.65, 8.48, 8.57, and 12.43%, respectively, as compared to their untreated control plants (Fig. 6A–D). While
MetA1+R. solani treatments showed higher chl a, chl b, total chls, and carotenoids by 5.61, 3.28, 4.55, and 1.84%, respectively, as
compared to their pathogen-treated R. solani plants (Fig. 6A–D).

3.6. MetA1 colonized in okra root

The percent of MetA1 colonization was 44.44 and 38.88% in root samples of MetA1 and MetA1+R. solani treatments, respectively.
There was no colonization observed in the control and R. solani-treated plants.

3.7. MetA1 colonized okra plant showed less oxidative damage after R. solani inoculation

The R. solani-inoculated plants had a profound increase in H2O2 content (Fig. 7A). Upon exposure to the pathogen, H2O2 content
increased by 12.93% in R. solani-inoculated plants compared to untreated control plants. Importantly, a reduction of H2O2 content was
observed in MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants by 5.21% as compared to plants treated with R. solani only. The MetA1-inoculated
plants also showed a reduced (4.70%) level of H2O2 as compared to untreated control plants (Fig. 7A).
Similarly, MDA content was increased by 54.73% in R. solani-inoculated plants compared to untreated control plants (Fig. 7B).
While a significant reduction of MDA content was observed in MetA1+R. solani inoculated plants by 14.96% as compared to plants
treated with R. solani only. The MetA1-inoculated plants showed a 3.51% reduced amount of MDA compared to untreated control
plants (Fig. 7B).

3.8. MetA1 improved antioxidants levels of okra plants

The highest levels of antioxidants (CAT, POD, APX, and GST) were observed in MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants, followed by

7
 A.A. Mimma et al.
Table 1
Effects of MetA1 treatment on growth-promoting traits in okra plants. Values (means ± SEs) of each treatment were attained from four biological replications (n = 4). Mean values with different
alphabetical letter(s) denote the statistically significant differences among the treatments, lsd, P < 0.05. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani.
Treatment Shoot Root Shoot fresh Root fresh Shoot dry Root dry Leaf Leaf fresh Leaf dry Number of Number of full- Number of Stem Plant
length length weight (g) weight (g) weight (g) weight (g) area weight (g) weight (g) leaves grown leaflets flowers diameter height
(cm) (cm) (cm2) (mm) (cm)

Control 90.9± 16.65± 54.292± 3.126± 9.55± 0.48 ± 97.74± 39.36 ± 5.01 ± 16.80 ± 12.20 ± 0.58ab 13.00 ± 6.62 ± 80.6±
0.75bc 0.76bc 0.82ab 0.06a 0.25b 0.02ab 0.95c 0.98bc 0.06b 0.58b 0.70a 0.07ab 0.16ab
8

a
MetA1 95.72± 19.81± 58.352± 3.362± 11.15± 0.53 ± 127.50 47.39 ± 5.64 ± 19.00 ± 13.20 ± 0.73 14.60 ± 6.73 ± 0.09a 87.98±
1.41a 0.43a 0.92a 0.13a 0.46a 0.03a ± 1.67a 0.22a 0.44a 0.92a 0.21a
0.69a
R.S 89.2± 15.46± 45.126± 2.46± 6.93± 0.41 ± 86.53± 35.48 ± 3.79 ± 15.40 ± 9.80 ± 0.58c 10.40 ± 5.51 ± 0.22c 75.47±
0.84c 0.23c 2.66c 0.07b 0.06c 0.01b 0.27d 1.66c 0.21c 0.67b 0.50b 0.67c
MetA1 þ 93.3± 17.47± 51.106± 2.726± 9.15± 0.44 ± 105.77 40.85 ± 4.19 ± 16.40 ± 10.40 ± 0.50b 12.40 ± 6.21 ± 0.09b 84±
R.S 0.75ab 0.30ab 0.96b 0.09b 0.02b 0.03b ± 0.46b 0.23c 0.50b 0.50ab 0.52b
1.56b

Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 5. Change of SPAD index after inoculation of MetA1 in okra plant of pot experiment. SPAD reading was recorded in different treatments at 1, 2,
3, and 4 weeks of DAI of R. solani. Each point in the line represents the mean value within each treatment category. Values (means ± SEs) with
different alphabetical letter(s) denote statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the treatments. Where, Control- (without any
treatment), MetA1- (M. anisopliae inoculation), R.S- R. solani inoculation (treated control), and MetA1+R.S- (M. anisopliae + R. solani inoculation).

Fig. 6. Effects of MetA1 inoculation on the contents of (A) chlorophyll (chl a), (B) Chl b, (C) total Chls, and (D) carotenoids in leaves of okra plants.
Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter(s) above the bars show statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the
treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani; FW, fresh weight.

9
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 7. Effects of MetA1 inoculation on the content of (A) H2O2 content, (B) malondialdehyde (MDA) content in okra plants challenged with
R. solani. Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter(s) above the bars show statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among
the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani; FW, fresh weight.

R. solani-inoculated plants (only) and MetA1-inoculated plants (only), and the lowest was in control plants (Fig. 8A–D). In CAT activity,
MetA1+R. solani treatment exhibited a 30.11% higher amount of CAT as compared to R. solani-inoculated plants (Fig. 8A). Both the
R. solani-inoculated and MetA1-inoculated plants showed enhancements in the content of CAT by 59.21 and 27.96%, respectively, as

Fig. 8. Effects of MetA1 on the activities of (A) catalase (CAT), (B) peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), (C) ascorbate peroxidase (APX),
and (D) glutathione S-transferase (GST) in leaves tissues of okra plants. Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter above the bars show
statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani.

10
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

compared to the untreated control plants (Fig. 8A).

The highest POD activity was observed in MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants, which were 10.19% higher compared to only
R. solani-inoculated plants (Fig. 8B). Both the R. solani-inoculated and MetA1-inoculated plants showed enhancements in the content of
POD by 19 and 6.30%, respectively, as compared to the untreated control plants (Fig. 8B).
In the case of APX, MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited a 5.62% higher amount as compared to R. solani-inoculated plants
(Fig. 8C). Both the R. solani-inoculated plants and the MetA1-inoculated plants showed enhancements in the content of APX by 25.76
and 8.44%, respectively, as compared to the untreated control plants (Fig. 8C).
The GST activity revealed that MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited 5.06% higher, respectively, as compared to R. solani-
inoculated plants (Fig. 8D). Both the R. solani-inoculated and MetA1-inoculated plants showed enhancements in the content of GST by
23.11 and 3.82%, respectively, as compared to the untreated control plants (Fig. 8D).

3.9. MetA1 increased osmoprotectants in okra plants under biotic stress

The highest levels of osmoprotectants (proline, total soluble sugars, and total carbohydrates) were observed in MetA1+R. solani
plants, followed by R. solani-inoculated plants (only) and MetA1-inoculated plants (only), and the lowest was in control plants
(Table 2).
The MetA1+R. solani treatment significantly exhibited a 44.77% higher proline content as compared to R. solani-inoculated plants.
Both the R. solani and MetA1-inoculated plants had enhanced proline by 60.39 and 25.01%, respectively, as compared to the untreated
control plants. In total soluble sugar content, the MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited significantly higher soluble sugar
content (12.15%) as compared to the R. solani-inoculated plants. Both the R. solani and MetA1-inoculated plants led to an enhancement
of sugar by 70.11 and 39.9%, respectively, as compared to the untreated control plants.
The total carbohydrate level data showed that MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited a 12.64% higher total carbohydrate
level as compared to R. solani-inoculated plants. Both the R. solani and MetA1-inoculated plants led to an enhancement of carbohydrate
levels by 24.73 and 12.37%, respectively, as compared to the untreated control plants (Table 2).

3.10. MetA1 increased secondary metabolites in okra plants

MetA1-inoculated plants showed augmentations in the levels of total phenolics by 1.5% when compared with the untreated control
plants (Fig. 9A). R. solani-inoculated plants reduced the phenolics level by 2.60% as compared to untreated control plants. In biotic
stress conditions, MetA1+R. solani inoculation plants exhibited 0.62% higher total phenolic content as compared to R. solani-inocu­
lated plants (Fig. 9A). Similarly, MetA1-inoculated plants showed augmentations in the levels of total flavonoids by 10.42% when
compared with the untreated control plants (Fig. 9B). In pathogen inoculation, R. solani-inoculated plants reduced the total flavonoids
level by 22.92% as compared to untreated control plants. In biotic stress conditions, MetA1+R. solani-inoculated plants exhibited a
significantly higher level of total flavonoids (6.78%) as compared to only R. solani-inoculated plants (Fig. 9B).

3.11. MetA1 reduced the disease incidence of okra

Disease incidence characterized by stunted root growth and darkish spot (Fig. 10A) in only pathogen-challenged plants was 40% at
15 days after inoculation (DAI), which was statistically different from MetA1 inoculated with R. solani plants (16.67%) (Fig. 10B). No
disease was observed in both untreated control and MetA1-inoculated plants.
Visualization of data with clustered heatmap and unveiling the treatment-variable relationship by PCA.
The heatmap utilized color intensity to represent the data, and the parameters were grouped into four distinct clusters using hi­
erarchical clustering (Fig. 11A). This allowed for a better understanding of the relationship between treatments and variables. Cluster
A described the growth parameters (shoot length, leaf fresh weight, root length, leaf area, stem diameter, shoot dry weight, shoot fresh
weight, chl a, carotenoids, leaf number, root dry weight, CAT, leaf dry weight, full-grown leaf, total chls, root fresh weight, chl b).
Cluster B indicated the antioxidant and secondary metabolites (POD and flavonoid), Cluster C described the stress indicator (H2O2,
MDA, and disease incidence), and Cluster D indicated oxidative stress mediator enzymes and secondary metabolites (APX, GST, CAT,
TSS, Total CHO, proline, and phenols). The “control” and “MetA1”-treated plants displayed a positive association with plant growth
parameters in cluster A (Fig. 11A). When compared with the “control” plants, the parameters of cluster A exhibited a declining trend in

Table 2
Effects of MetA1 on the level of proline, total carbohydrates, and total soluble sugars in the leave tissues of okra plants. Mean values with different
alphabetical letter(s) denote the statistically significant differences among the treatments, lsd, P < 0.05. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani; FW,
Fresh weight.
1 1 1
Proline (μmol g− FW) Total carbohydrates (mg g− FW) Total soluble sugars (mg g− FW)
Treatments

Control 0.82 ± 0.08c 15.29 ± 0.60c 5.13 ± 0.40c

MetA1 1.02 ± 0.08bc 17.18 ± 0.38bc 7.17 ± 0.59b
R. S 1.31 ± 0.03b 19.08 ± 0.50b 8.72 ± 0.35ab
MetA1þR.S 1.89 ± 0.16a 21.48 ± 0.89a 9.78 ± 0.53a

11
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 9. Effect of MetA1 on secondary metabolites of okra plants. The levels of (A) Total phenolics content (B) Total flavonoids contents of leaves
tissues of okra plant. Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter above the bars show statistically significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05)
among the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani; FW, fresh weight.

Fig. 10. Disease incidence of okra plant root in a pot experiment. (A) Stunted root growth and a darkish spot in the root. (B) MetA1 reduced disease
incidence at 15 days after inoculation of R. solani. The highest disease incidence was observed in R. solani inoculated plants. No disease was observed
in untreated control (T1) or MetA1 inoculated plants (T2). Values (means ± SEs) with different alphabetical letter above the bars show statistically
significant differences (lsd, P < 0.05) among the treatments. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani; ND, no disease detected.

R. solani-treated plants (Fig. 11A). The oxidative stress parameters and disease incidence in cluster C exhibited a strong association
with R. solani-treated stress conditions; however, all the features of this cluster declined upon MetA1 treatment (Fig. 11A). The an­
tioxidants and secondary metabolites in both clusters D and B showed the strongest association with “MetA1+R. solani,” followed by
R. solani treatments (Fig. 11A). In comparison with the “control” plants, the parameters of cluster D displayed an increasing tendency
under R. solani and “MetA1+R. solani” treatment conditions (Fig. 11A).
A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the relationship between different treatments and variables, as
shown in Fig. 11B. The results indicated that PC1 (73.6%) and PC2 (24.0%) accounted for most of the variability, with a total explained
variability of 97.6%. Interestingly, cluster A and cluster B parameters were closely associated with the “MetA1” and “MetA1+R. solani”
treatments, while cluster B and cluster C variables were found to be closely related to the “MetA1+R. solani” and “R. solani” treat­
ments. Moreover, the “MetA1” plants were found to have a closer relationship with cluster A and cluster B variables than cluster C and
cluster D variables (Fig. 11B).

4. Discussion

The soil-borne phytopathogenic fungus R. solani is widespread across the globe and is commonly managed through the application
of chemical fungicides [46]. As a component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM), biological control provides an environmentally
beneficial strategy for managing plant diseases. This study evaluated the efficacy of endophyte M. anisopliae against plant pathogen
R. solani through in vitro and dual culture antagonistic bioassays; the growth improvement and inhibition of R. solani by Metarhizium
colonized okra plants in a pot experiment; and the role of Metarhizium induced antioxidative defense responses against R. solani
infection in okra plants.

12
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

Fig. 11. (A) Clustering heatmap visualizing different parameters under different treatments at a glance. Normalized mean values of different pa­
rameters were used to prepare the heatmap. The parameters were grouped into four (A–D) distinct clusters. Color scale indicates the changing trend
of the normalized mean values of different parameters under different treatments. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) represents the rela­
tionship among the different treatments and parameter. MetA1, M. anisopliae; R. S, R. solani.

The results of the dual culture assay indicated that MetA1 inhibited the growth of R. solani (Fig. 1A). The microscopic examination
of the inhibition zone revealed that the growth of R. solani had ceased (Fig. 1C). Previous research suggested that the metabolites
produced by entomopathogenic fungi inhibit plant pathogen growth [23,47,48]. Using a CFC filtrate bioassay (Fig. 2), this study also
confirmed that MetA1 produces antifungal metabolites. This was in line with previous reports, which found that CFCs produced by
hypocrealean fungi were effective at inhibiting the growth of fungal pathogens [21,23,49,50]. A recent study found that CFCs of
M. anisopliae containing active toxic compounds and secondary metabolites damaged the mycelium and conidial plasma membrane
integrity of the mold-causing fungus Botrytis cinerea, respectively [21]. Besides the production of insect cuticle-degrading secondary
metabolites like destruxins, swainsonine, and polyketides [51], Metarhizium also produces the secondary metabolites aurovertins,
fungerin, N-(methyl-3-oxodec-6-enoyl)-2-pyrroline, and N-(methyl-3-oxodecanoyl)-2-pyrroline, which showed antagonistic effects
against Phytophthora sojae and Aphanomyces cochlioides [52]. A wide range of antibiotics produced by the species Beauveria, Meta­
rhizium, and Trichoderma are being approved by the European Union as fungicides and insecticides [53]. However, fungal metabolites
produced by MetA1 with fungal inhibition properties require further investigation and the development of biocontrol agents for the
prevention of plant diseases.
The plant growth potentiality of microorganisms is associated with different physiological activities like mineral nutrient solu­
bilization, synthesis of phytohormones and enzymes, plant protection against biotic stress, etc. [54]. The isolate MetA1 showed plant
growth ability by solubilizing phosphate and producing extracellular catalase enzymes in vitro test (Fig. 3A and B). The strains of
M. marquandii showed the ability to solubilize phosphorus and produce indoleacetic acid (IAA), and their soil inoculation increased
plant height, dry weight, and P and N contents in maize, bean, and soybean plants [55]. It has been reported that plant
growth-promoting rhizobacteria from the rhizosphere showed similar catalase activity [56–58].
In pot conditions, the fungus MetA1 promoted the growth of okra plants by enhancing photosynthesis, which resulted in increased
shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, leaf area, leaf fresh weight, leaf dry weight, leaf
number, stem diameter, mature leaf, and root dry weight (Fig. 4 and Table 1). The PCA results supported our results by demonstrating

13
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

that, compared to only pathogen-inoculated plants, MetA1-treated plants under R. solani-challenged conditions displayed a stronger
positive relationship with plant growth characteristics (Fig. 11B). Endophytic colonization of fungi increased SPAD chlorophyll
fluorescence in wheat, lettuce, maize, tomato, and zucchini after the inoculation of Trichoderma atroviride [59,60]. The growth pro­
motion of cucumber by Metarhizium spp. by increasing the synthesis of chlorophyll and phenolic compounds was also reported [61].
The chlorophyll content was also increased in wheat and cucumber plants treated with T. longibrachiatum and P. indica, respectively
[62,63].
In our study, we observed an increased level of H2O2 and MDA in pathogen-inoculated plants (Fig. 7A and B). Biotic stress caused a
remarkable increase in H2O2 content, which is a clear indication of oxidative stress [64]. An augmented level of H2O2 along with
enhanced lipid peroxidation is a parameter for the extent of membrane damage that ultimately leads to cell death [65–67]. Plants have
developed a strong antioxidant defense mechanism comprising both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to counteract
oxidative damage caused by ROS under biotic stress. The PCA analysis also demonstrated that MetA1-primed pathogen inoculated okra
plants had a negative correlation with ROS products and MDA levels and a strong positive correlation with the activities of enzymatic
antioxidants in comparison to R. solani-challenged non-inoculated plants (Fig. 11B).
CAT, an enzyme that removes hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in peroxisomes, was the first antioxidant enzyme discovered [68]. Ac­
cording to our findings, the CAT activity of okra plants colonized by MetA1 was boosted after being inoculated with the pathogen
R. solani (Fig. 8A). Similar activity was found when T. harzianum T22 colonized plants and modulated the expression of the genes
encoding antioxidant enzymes, increasing CAT activity during stress conditions [69]. An increase in the activity of antioxidant en­
zymes mitigates oxidative damage and rectifies the photosynthetic imbalance resulting from pathogenic lesion production [70].
The stress-related protein POD, which is found in higher amounts when the plant is under stress, is responsible for regulating a
variety of processes, including photosynthesis and respiration, as well as the lignification and development of cell walls and the
infection of pathogens [71]. In our investigation, MetA1 treatment of pathogen-challenged okra led to a significant increase in POD
activity (Fig. 8B). Our findings corroborated previous research indicating that POD is a stress-related protein that increases under
stressful conditions [72]. Additionally, inoculation of MetA1 with the pathogen further elevated the activities of APX as compared to
pathogen treatment alone (Fig. 8C). This APX employs ascorbic acid as a reducing agent to facilitate the reduction of hydrogen
peroxide to water and adds a second layer of protection [68,70]. In similar research, Trichoderma atroviride ID20G inoculation ame­
liorates drought stress-induced damage by improving antioxidant defense in maize seedlings [73].
The enzyme GST protects the cell from oxidative injury by neutralizing reactive molecules with glutathione (GSH) [74]. We
observed a higher level of GST in plants that were treated with R. solani, and this rose even further in MetA1-colonized okra plants that
had been treated with R. solani (Fig. 8D). The level of GST increased in okra seedlings damaged by soil-borne Rhizoctonia, suggesting
activation of the glutathione conjugation system in defense mechanisms counteracting invasion and eliminating the consequences of
the infection, which agrees with our results [75].
Soluble sugars and carbohydrates act as important osmolytes, playing multiple functions in plants, including restriction of water
loss, stabilization of proteins, and maintenance of osmotic and transcriptional regulation of certain genes. Our study found higher
amounts of proline, total soluble sugars, and total carbohydrates in pathogen-challenged MetA1-colonized okra (MetA1+R. solani
treatment) (Table 2). Proline helps in cell wall lignification via its ability to influence peroxidase activity, which increases the plant’s
resistance to pathogens [76].
Plants colonized with beneficial fungi and bacteria demonstrate a significant increase in phenolic substances, which induce a plant
defense response through changing different metabolic processes [77]. In our study, MetA1-colonized okra plants had increased levels
of the secondary metabolites phenolics and flavonoids (Fig. 9A and B). These secondary metabolites, which were shown to be raised to
a greater degree in MetA1-colonized plants after R. solani infection, provided evidence of a heightened level of plant defense. It was
also evident from other studies that the bacterial endophyte Alcaligenes faecalis, reprogrammed the host’s defense by increasing
phenolics and protecting the okra plant from the collar rot fungus Sclerotium rolfsii [67]. The combined application of Trichoderma
album and Bacillus subtilis managed Sclerotinia root disease by increasing defense metabolites, phenols, and flavonoids in tomatoes
[78]. Thus, the current investigation has demonstrated the potential involvement of MetA1 in the regulation of the antioxidant system,
leading to the development of an adaptive mechanism that mitigates ROS accumulation and oxidative damage in response to path­
ogenic stressful conditions.
The disease incidence data revealed that MetA1 reduced disease incidence percent in MetA1+R. solani treated plants compared to
only R. solani treatment (Fig. 10B). Other studies also showed the suppression of plant pathogens by Metarhizium. The leaf blight
pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus was suppressed in maize by M. robertsii seed treatment [79], and Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli was
suppressed in haricot beans by soil application of that species [80]. The reduced occurrence of disease in plants treated with MetA1 and
R. solani may be attributed to the impact of mycoparasitism or competitive exclusion in the root zone, which helps in the prevention of
pathogen invasion [81].
In summary, the application of M. anisopliae isolate MetA1 elevated the antioxidative defense system in the okra plant and
improved the activities of antioxidants by increasing different enzyme activities, viz., CAT, POD, GST, APX, and nonenzymatic an­
tioxidants, viz., phenol and flavonoid, which were further elevated after R. solani infection. The fungus M. anisopliae also increased
soluble sugars and carbohydrate contents, indicating a better osmotic adjustment in diseases infecting okra plants. Thus, MetA1 was
found to be an effective candidate for the biological control program.

5. Conclusion

The fungal isolate MetA1 improved okra plant growth parameters and was also found effective to reduce Rhizoctonia root disease

14
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

incidence and pathogenic stress by modulating the activity of antioxidant defense enzymes and elevating the nonenzymatic osmo­
protectants levels in okra. Therefore, the application of M. anisopliae (MetA1) to okra would be a successful strategy for both growth
promotion and disease control programs.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam and Afsana Akter Mimma: Conceived and designed the experiments.
Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam, Md. Abdullahil Baki Bhuiyan and Md. Ashraful Haque: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis
tools or data.
Afsana Akter Mimma, Md. Zahid Hasan Chowdhury, Tanjina Akter and Sharmin Sultana: Performed the experiments, Analyzed and
interpreted the data.
Afsana Akter Mimma, Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam and Md. Abdullahil Baki Bhuiyan: Wrote and revised the paper.

5.1. Data availability statement

Data associated with this study has been deposited at NCBI accession OQ581920.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing
interests:
Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam reports administrative support and equipment, drugs, or supplies were provided by Bangabandhu
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University. Shah Mohammad Naimul Islam reports a relationship with Bangabandhu Sheikh
Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University that includes: employment.

Acknowledgments

This research acknowledged the Research Management Wing, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University,
Gazipur, Bangladesh (project 6/2018) for providing fund for Metarhizium isolation and characterization.

References

[1] M.I. Ali, M.A. Khan, A. Rashid, M.T. Javed, M. Sajid, Epidemiology of Okra yellow vein mosaic virus (OYVMV) and its management through tracer, mycotal and
imidacloprid, Am. J. Plant Sci. 3 (2012) 1741–1745, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.312212.
[2] H. Saleem, A.R. Khan, T.A. Jilani, M.S. Jilani, Knowledge based system for diagnosis and management of okra diseases, Int. J. Eng. Inf. Syst. 4 (2020) 255–268.
[3] I. Jamir, A.K. Mandal, A.P. Devi, T. Bhattacharjee, P.K. Maurya, S. Dutta, A. Chattopadhyay, K. Pramanik, S. Banik, Screening of genotypes against viral diseases
and assessment of yield loss due to Yellow vein mosaic virus in okra grown in the eastern part of India, Indian Phytopathol. 73 (2020) 125–133, https://doi.org/
10.1007/s42360-019-00183-0.
[4] S. Mohankumar, G. Karthikeyan, C. Durairaj, S. Ramakrishnan, B. Preetha, S. Sambathkumar, Integrated pest management of okra in India, in: Integrated Pest
Management of Tropical Vegetable Crops, Springer Netherlands, 2016, pp. 167–177, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0924-6_7.
[5] H.A. Shafique, V. Sultana, S. Ehteshamul-Haque, M. Athar, Management of soil-borne diseases of organic vegetables, J. Plant Prot. Res. 56 (2016) 221–230,
https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0043.
[6] S. Huq, J. Chow, A. Fenton, C. Stott, J. Taub, H. Wright, Confronting Climate Change in Bangladesh: Policy Strategies for Adaptation and Resilience, Springer
International Publishing, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05237-9.
[7] E.T. Bodah, Root rot diseases in plants: a review of common causal agents and management strategies, Agri. Res. Technol. Open Access J. 5 (2017), 555661,
https://doi.org/10.19080/artoaj.2017.05.555661.
[8] L. Irshad, S. Dawar, Effect of different dosages of nursery fertilizers in the control of root rot of okra and mung bean, Pak. J. Bot. 38 (2006) 217–223.
[9] B. Liu, H. Wang, Z. Ma, X. Gai, Y. Sun, S. He, X. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Xuan, Z. Gao, Transcriptomic evidence for involvement of reactive oxygen species in Rhizoctonia
solani AG1 IA sclerotia maturation, PeerJ 6 (2018) e5103, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5103.
[10] R. Vera-Estrella, E. Blumwald, V.J. Higgins, Non-specific glycopeptide elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum: evidence for involvement of active oxygen species in
elicitor-induced effects on tomato cell suspensions, Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 42 (1993) 9–22, https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1993.1002.
[11] A. Abdelmoteleb, L. Moreno-Ramírez, B. Valdez-Salas, M.F. Seleiman, S. El-Hendawy, K.J. Aldhuwaib, M. Alotaibi, D. González-Mendoza, New Bacillus subtilis
strains isolated from Prosopis glandulosa rhizosphere for suppressing Fusarium spp. and enhancing growth of Gossypium hirsutum L, Biology 12 (2022) 73, https://
doi.org/10.3390/biology12010073.
[12] M.F. Seleiman, A.N. Hardan, Importance of mycorrhizae in crop productivity, in: Mitigating Environmental Stresses for Agricultural Sustainability in Egypt,
Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021, pp. 471–484, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64323-2_17.
[13] H.F.A. Ahmed, M.F. Seleiman, I.A.A. Mohamed, R.S. Taha, D.O. Wasonga, M.L. Battaglia, Activity of Essential oils and plant extracts as biofungicides for
suppression of soil-borne fungi associated with root rot and wilt of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.), Horticulturae 9 (2023) 222, https://doi.org/10.3390/
horticulturae9020222.
[14] H. Elbrense, A.M.A. Elmasry, M.F. Seleiman, M.S. Al-Harbi, A.M. Abd El-Raheem, Can symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus) be more efficient than
their entomopathogenic nematodes against Pieris rapae and Pentodon algerinus larvae? Biology 10 (2021) 999, https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10100999.

15
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

[15] F.V. Ferreira, M.A. Musumeci, Trichoderma as biological control agent: scope and prospects to improve efficacy, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37 (2021) 90,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03058-7.
[16] S. Zeilinger, V.K. Gupta, T.E.S. Dahms, R.N. Silva, H.B. Singh, R.S. Upadhyay, E.V. Gomes, C.K.-M. Tsui, C. Nayak S, Friends or foes? Emerging insights from
fungal interactions with plants, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40 (2016) 182–207, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuv045.
[17] J. Poveda, P. Abril-Urias, C. Escobar, Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes by filamentous fungi inducers of resistance: Trichoderma, mycorrhizal and
endophytic fungi, Front. Microbiol. 11 (2020) 992, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00992.
[18] A. Martinez-Medina, V. Flors, M. Heil, B. Mauch-Mani, C.M.J. Pieterse, M.J. Pozo, J. Ton, N.M. van Dam, U. Conrath, Recognizing plant defense priming, Trends
Plant Sci. 21 (2016) 818–822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.009.
[19] M. Ghorbanpour, M. Omidvari, P. Abbaszadeh-Dahaji, R. Omidvar, K. Kariman, Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of beneficial fungi against plant
diseases, Biol. Control 117 (2018) 147–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.11.006.
[20] Q. Hao, D.M.D. Albaghdady, Y. Xiao, X. Xiao, C. Mo, T. Tian, G. Wang, Endophytic Metarhizium anisopliae is a potential biocontrol agent against wheat Fusarium
head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum, J. Plant Pathol. (2021) 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-021-00866-6.
[21] M.S. Sarven, Q. Hao, J. Deng, F. Yang, G. Wang, Y. Xiao, X. Xiao, Biological control of tomato gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea with the entomopathogenic
fungus Metarhizium Anisopliae, Pathogens 9 (2020), https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9030213.
[22] G.J. Elena, P.J. Beatriz, P. Alejandro, R.E. Lecuona, Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin promotes growth and has endophytic activity in tomato
plants, Adv. Biol. Res. 5 (2011) 22–27.
[23] R.K. Sasan, M.J. Bidochka, The insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii (Clavicipitaceae) is also an endophyte that stimulates plant root development, Am.
J. Bot. 99 (2012) 101–107, https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100136.
[24] I. Ahmad, M. del Mar Jiménez-Gasco, D.S. Luthe, S.N. Shakeel, M.E. Barbercheck, Endophytic Metarhizium robertsii promotes maize growth, suppresses insect
growth, and alters plant defense gene expression, Biol. Control 144 (2020), 104167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104167.
[25] A.N. Bader, G.L. Salerno, F. Covacevich, V.F. Consolo, Native Trichoderma harzianum strains from Argentina produce indole-3 acetic acid and phosphorus
solubilization, promote growth and control wilt disease on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 32 (2020) 867–873, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jksus.2019.04.002.
[26] E. González-Pérez, M.A. Ortega-Amaro, E. Bautista, P. Delgado-Sánchez, J.F. Jiménez-Bremont, The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae enhances
Arabidopsis, tomato, and maize plant growth, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 176 (2022) 34–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.02.008.
[27] X. Liao, T.R. O’Brien, W. Fang, R.J. St Leger, The plant beneficial effects of Metarhizium species correlate with their association with roots, Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 98 (2014) 7089–7096, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5788-2.
[28] M. Kern, S. de F. Maraschin, D.V. Endt, A. Schrank, M.H. Vainstein, G. Pasquali, Expression of a chitinase gene from Metarhizium anisopliae in tobacco plants
confers resistance against Rhizoctonia solani, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 160 (2010) 1933–1946, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8701-1.
[29] R. Rajendiran, D. Jegadeeshkumar, B.T. Sureshkumar, T. Nisha, In vitro assessment of antagonistic activity of Trichoderma viride against post harvest pathogens,
J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 6 (2010) 31–35.
[30] M.M. Hossain, F. Sultana, M. Kubota, M. Hyakumachi, Differential inducible defense mechanisms against bacterial speck pathogen in Arabidopsis thaliana by
plant-growth-promoting-fungus Penicillium sp. GP16-2 and its cell free filtrate, Plant Soil 304 (2008) 227–239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9542-3.
[31] K. Reiner, Catalase Test Protocol, vol. 2010, American Society for Microbiology, 2010.
[32] M. Bhuiyan, M.T. Rahman, K.A. Bhuiyan, In vitro screening of fungicides and antagonists against Sclerotium rolfsii, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11 (2012) 14822–14827,
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.1463.
[33] S. Parsa, V. Ortiz, F.E. Vega, Establishing fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: towards endophytic biological control, J. Vis. Exp. (2013), e50360, https://
doi.org/10.3791/50360.
[34] M. Abdelhamidg, T. Horiuchi, S. Oba, Evaluation of the SPAD value in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) leaves in relation to different fertilizer applications, Plant Prod.
Sci. 6 (2003) 185–189, https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.6.185.
[35] R.J. Porra, W.a.A. Thompson, P.E. Kriedemann, Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b
extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy, Biochim. Biophys. Acta -
Bioenerg. 975 (1989) 384–394, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-2728(89)80347-0.
[36] L.S. Bates, R.P.a. Waldren, I.D. Teare, Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies, Plant Soil 39 (1973) 205–207, https://doi.org/10.1007/
bf00018060.
[37] M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A.t. Rebers, F. Smith, Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem. 28 (1956)
350–356, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017.
[38] E.A. Ainsworth, K.M. Gillespie, Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, Nat. Protoc. 2
(2007) 875–877, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.102.
[39] J. Zhishen, T. Mengcheng, W. Jianming, The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals, Food Chem.
64 (1999) 555–559, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(98)00102-2.
[40] C.-W. Yu, T.M. Murphy, C.-H. Lin, Hydrogen peroxide-induced chilling tolerance in mung beans mediated through ABA-independent glutathione accumulation,
Funct, Plant Biol 30 (2003) 955–963, https://doi.org/10.1071/fp03091.
[41] R.L. Heath, L. Packer, Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125 (1968)
189–198, https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1.
[42] M.G. Mostofa, M. Fujita, Salicylic acid alleviates copper toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by up-regulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems,
Ecotoxicology 22 (2013) 959–973, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-013-1073-x.
[43] M. Hasanuzzaman, A. Rahman Alam, K. Nahar Hasanuzzaman, M. Fujita, Exogenous proline and glycine betaine mediated upregulation of antioxidant defense
and glyoxalase systems provides better protection against salt-induced oxidative stress in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties, BioMed Res. Int. 2014 (2014),
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/757219.
[44] H.M. Hemeda, B.P. Klein, Effects of naturally occurring antioxidants on peroxidase activity of vegetable extracts, J. Food Sci. 55 (1990) 184–185, https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb06048.x.
[45] A.K. Mahato, Effect of age on susceptibility of tomato plants to Sclerotium Rolfsii (Sacc.) caused collar rot disease, Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 5 (2017) 1108–1112,
https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.5843.
[46] A.A. Heflish, A. Abdelkhalek, A. Alaskar, S.I. Behiry, Protective and curative effects of Trichoderma asperelloides Ta41 on tomato root rot caused by Rhizoctonia
solani Rs33, Agronomy 11 (2021) 1162, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061162.
[47] M.V. Shternshis, T.V. Shpatova, A.A. Lelyak, E. Drozdetskaya, In vitro antifungal activity of plant beneficial microorganisms against phytopathagenic fungi,
Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia. 11 (2014) 1489–1497, https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/1543.
[48] L. Barra-Bucarei, A. France Iglesias, M. Gerding González, G.I. Silva Aguayo, J. Carrasco-Fernández, J.F. Castro, J. Ortiz Campos, Antifungal activity of Beauveria
bassiana endophyte against Botrytis cinerea in two solanaceae crops, Microorganisms 8 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010065.
[49] Lozano-Tovar, I. Garrido-Jurado, E. Quesada-Moraga, M.C. Raya-Ortega, A. Trapero-Casas, Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana release secondary
metabolites with antagonistic activity against Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora megasperma olive pathogens, Crop Prot 100 (2017) 186–195, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.cropro.2017.06.026.
[50] S. Kushwaha, S. Kumar, B. Chaudhary, Efficacy of Trichoderma against Sclerotium rolfsii causing collar rot disease of lentil under in vitro conditions, J. Appl. Nat.
Sci. 10 (2018) 307–312, https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v10i1.1622.
[51] N. Sbaraini, R.L.M. Guedes, F.C. Andreis, Â. Junges, G.L. de Morais, M.H. Vainstein, A.L.R. de Vasconcelos, A. Schrank, Secondary metabolite gene clusters in
the entomopathogen fungus Metarhizium anisopliae: genome identification and patterns of expression in a cuticle infection model, BMC Genom. 17 (2016),
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3067-6.

16
A.A. Mimma et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e18978

[52] S.P. Putri, K. Ishido, H. Kinoshita, S. Kitani, F. Ihara, Y. Sakihama, Y. Igarashi, T. Nihira, Production of antioomycete compounds active against the
phytopathogens Phytophthora sojae and Aphanomyces cochlioides by clavicipitoid entomopathogenic fungi, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 117 5 (2014) 557–562, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.10.014.
[53] A. Roca, M.A. Matilla, Microbial antibiotics take the lead in the fight against plant pathogens, Microb. Biotechnol. 16 (2022) 28–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/
1751-7915.14185.
[54] S. Triveni, R. Prasanna, L. Shukla, A.K. Saxena, Evaluating the biochemical traits of novel Trichoderma-based biofilms for use as plant growth-promoting
inoculants, Ann. Microbiol. 63 (2013) 1147–1156, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0573-x.
[55] N.C. Baron, A. de Souza Pollo, E.C. Rigobelo, Purpureocillium lilacinum and Metarhizium marquandii as plant growth-promoting fungi, PeerJ 8 (2020), e9005,
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9005.
[56] S.A. Wakelin, R.A. Warren, P.R. Harvey, M.H. Ryder, Phosphate solubilization by Penicillium spp. closely associated with wheat roots, Biol. Fertil. Soils 40 (2004)
36–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0750-6.
[57] K. Geetha, A.B. Rajithasri, B. Bhadraiah, Isolation of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria from rhizosphere soils of green gram , biochemical characterization
and screening for antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent. 3 (2014) 47–54.
[58] S. Mayo, S. Gutierrez, M.G. Malmierca, A. Lorenzana, M.P. Campelo, R. Hermosa, P.A. Casquero, Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth
of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes, Front. Plant Sci. 6 (2015) 685, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00685.
[59] G. Colla, Y. Rouphael, E. Di Mattia, C. El-Nakhel, M. Cardarelli, Co-inoculation of Glomus intraradices and Trichoderma atroviride acts as a biostimulant to
promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake of vegetable crops, J. Sci. Food Agric. 95 (2015) 1706–1715, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6875.
[60] S.B. Tagele, S.W. Kim, H.G. Lee, H.S. Kim, Y.S. Lee, Effectiveness of multi-trait Burkholderia contaminans KNU17BI1 in growth promotion and management of
banded leaf and sheath blight in maize seedling, Microbiol. Res. 214 (2018) 8–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.05.004.
[61] R.S. Shaalan, E. Gerges, W. Habib, L. Ibrahim, Endophytic colonization by Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae induces growth promotion effect and
increases the resistance of cucumber plants against Aphis gossypii, J. Plant Prot. Res. 61 (2021), https://doi.org/10.24425/jppr.2021.139244.
[62] S. Zhang, Y. Gan, B. Xu, Application of plant-growth-promoting fungi Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through
improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression, Front. Plant Sci. 7 (2016) 1405, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01405.
[63] M.A.M. Atia, E.A. Abdeldaym, M. Abdelsattar, D.S.S. Ibrahim, I. Saleh, M. Abd Elwahab, G.H. Osman, I.A. Arif, M.E. Abdelaziz, Piriformospora indica promotes
cucumber tolerance against root-knot nematode by modulating photosynthesis and innate responsive genes, Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 27 (2020) 279–287, https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.09.007.
[64] J. Singh, P. Singh, A. Vaishnav, S. Ray, R.S. Rajput, S.M. Singh, H.B. Singh, Belowground fungal volatiles perception in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) facilitates
plant growth under biotic stress, Microbiol. Res. 246 (2021), 126721, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126721.
[65] M. Airaki, M. Leterrier, R.M. Mateos, R. Valderrama, M. Chaki, J.B. Barroso, L.A. Del Rio, J.M. Palma, F.J. Corpas, Metabolism of reactive oxygen species and
reactive nitrogen species in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants under low temperature stress, Plant Cell Environ. 35 (2012) 281–295, https://doi.org/10.1111/
j.1365-3040.2011.02310.x.
[66] A. Jain, S. Singh, B. Kumar Sarma, H. Bahadur Singh, Microbial consortium–mediated reprogramming of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, J. Appl. Microbiol. 112 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05220.x.
[67] S. Ray, V. Singh, S. Singh, B.K. Sarma, H.B. Singh, Biochemical and histochemical analyses revealing endophytic Alcaligenes faecalis mediated suppression of
oxidative stress in Abelmoschus esculentus challenged with Sclerotium rolfsii, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 109 (2016) 430–441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
plaphy.2016.10.019.
[68] K. Das, A. Roychoudhury, Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants, Front. Environ.
Sci. Eng. China 2 (2014) 53, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053.
[69] F. Mastouri, T. Björkman, G.E. Harman, Trichoderma harzianum enhances antioxidant defense of tomato seedlings and resistance to water deficit, Mol. Plant
Microbe Interact. 25 (2012) 1264–1271, https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-09-11-0240.
[70] M. Ramzan, S. Sana, N. Javaid, A.A. Shah, S. Ejaz, W.N. Malik, N.A. Yasin, S. Alamri, M.H. Siddiqui, R. Datta, Mitigation of bacterial spot disease induced biotic
stress in Capsicum annuum L. cultivars via antioxidant enzymes and isoforms, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 9445, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88797-1.
[71] R. Kavitha, S. Umesha, Regulation of defense-related enzymes associated with bacterial spot resistance in tomato, Phytoparasitica 36 (2008) 144, https://doi.
org/10.1007/bf02981327.
[72] A. Hashem, E.F. Abd_Allah, A.A. Alqarawi, A.A. Al Huqail, D. Egamberdieva, Alleviation of abiotic salt stress in Ochradenus baccatus (del.) by Trichoderma
hamatum (bonord.) bainier, J. Plant Interact. 9 (2014) 857–868, https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.983568.
[73] N.S. Guler, N. Pehlivan, S.A. Karaoglu, S. Guzel, A. Bozdeveci, Trichoderma atroviride ID20G inoculation ameliorates drought stress-induced damages by
improving antioxidant defence in maize seedlings, Acta Physiol. Plant. 38 (2016) 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2153-3.
[74] S. Kumar, P.K. Trivedi, Glutathione S-transferases: role in combating abiotic stresses including arsenic detoxification in plants, Front. Plant Sci. 9 (2018) 751,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00751.
[75] A. Bittsánszky, V. Rai Ravishankar, G. Oros, Response of glutathione conjugation system to soil borne Rhizoctonia infection of okra, Acta Phytopathol. Entomol.
Hung. 47 (2012) 191–202, https://doi.org/10.1556/aphyt.47.2012.2.2.
[76] F. Cai, G. Yu, P. Wang, Z. Wei, L. Fu, Q. Shen, W. Chen, Harzianolide, a novel plant growth regulator and systemic resistance elicitor from Trichoderma
harzianum, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 73 (2013) 106–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.08.011.
[77] C.M. Wallis, E.R.-A. Galarneau, Phenolic compound induction in plant-microbe and plant-insect interactions: a meta-analysis, Front. Plant Sci. 11 (2020),
580753, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.580753.
[78] G.A. Ahmed, A.M.M. Mahdy, R.N. Fawzy, N.A. Gomaa, Integrated management of tomato sclerotinia rot disease by using the combined treatments between
compost, bioagents and some commercial biocides, Benha Journal of Applied Sciences 2 (2017) 9–22, https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2017.162920.
[79] I. Ahmad, M. del M. Jiménez-Gasco, D.S. Luthe, M.E. Barbercheck, Endophytic Metarhizium robertsii suppresses the phytopathogen, Cochliobolus heterostrophus
and modulates maize defenses, PLoS One 17 (2022), e0272944, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272944.
[80] R.K. Sasan, M.J. Bidochka, Antagonism of the endophytic insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii against the bean plant pathogen Fusarium solani f. sp.
phaseoli, Can. J. Plant Pathol. 35 (2013) 288–293, https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2013.823114.
[81] P.K. Mukherjee, A. Mendoza-Mendoza, S. Zeilinger, B.A. Horwitz, Mycoparasitism as a mechanism of Trichoderma-mediated suppression of plant diseases,
Fungal Biol. Rev. 39 (2022) 15–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2021.11.004.

17