Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 1199. A person alternatively bound by different (2)The debtor has no more right of choice when, among the
prestations shall completely perform one of them. The prestations whereby he is alternatively bound, only one is
creditor cannot be compelled to receive part of one and part practicable. (Art. 1202.) In this case, there is not only a
of the other undertaking. (1131) limitation but a loss of the right of choice belonging to the
Kinds of obligation according to object. debtor. The obligation becomes simple.
1. Simple obligation - one where there is only one Example:
prestation(obligation). D obliged himself to give C a particular horse or a stolen
Examples: cellphone or to cyberbully C’s former girlfriend. Here,
D obliged himself to deliver to C a the obligation becomes a simple obligation – to give a
cellphone. particular horse. D cannot choose to give C a stolen
D promised to repair the computer of cellphone or to cyberbully C’s former girlfriend because
C. both are unlawful.
2. Compound obligation - one where there are two or more Examples:
prestations. 1. Impossible. - D promised to give C P5,000, or a specific
a. Conjunctive obligation - one where there are several cellphone, or the galaxy. Here, D cannot choose to give the
prestations and all of them are due. galaxy because it is physically impossible.
b. Distributive obligation - one where two or more of the 2. Unlawful. - D obliged himself to deliver to C a marijuana
prestations is due. brick, or a car, or a cellphone, or to help C cheat in the exam.
1. Alternative obligation - several prestations are due D can choose only to deliver a car or cellphone.
but the performance of one is sufficient. The debtor cannot choose that which:
Example: 3. could not have been the object of the obligation - D
D obliged himself to give C a particular borrowed from C P10,000. It was agreed that D would give C
horse or a specific cellphone, or to teach C his cellphone, or P10,000, or his rubber shoes.
how to drive. Here, it is enough that D fully Suppose D has 2 cellphones – an old Nokia worth P1,000 and
performs one prestation. a new Samsung worth P10,000. D cannot choose the old
2. Facultative obligation - only one prestation is due, Nokia because it could not have been the object of the
but there is a substitute another. obligation.
Example: 4. only one prestation is practicable. – S will deliver to B his
D obliged himself to give C a particular horse, or his carabao, or his refregirator. The horse and the
horse, or as substitute to give a specific carabao were lost without the fault of S. S has no more choice.
cellphone or to teach C how to drive. He must deliver the refrigerator which is the only one
practicable.
Article 1200. The right of choice belongs to the debtor, unless
it has been expressly granted to the creditor. (3) The debtor cannot choose those prestations which are:
The debtor shall have no right to choose those prestations which - impossible;
are impossible, unlawful or which could not have been the - unlawful; or
object of the obligation. (1132) - which could not have been the object of the
General Rule: The right to choose which prestation to perform obligation.
belongs to the debtor.
Examples:
Article 1201. The choice shall produce no effect except from
D insured his house with C (Bayad Agad Insurance
the time it has been communicated. (1133)
Company). It is agreed that if the house is destroyed or
Communication of notice that choice has been made.
damaged, D may either (1) pay the damage or loss, or
1. Effect of notice - until the choice is made and communicated,
(2) restore or rebuild the house.
the obligation remains alternative.
* Since nothing is said in the contract as to who has the
- debtor’s choice once communicated is irrevocable and
right of choice, it belongs to C (debtor, Bayad Agad).
the obligation ceases to be alternative and becomes
S binds himself to deliver item one or item two to B on
simple.
Dec. 10 and to communicate his choice on or before
- the concurrence of the creditor to choice is not required
Dec. 5.
2. Proof and form of notice - The burden of proving that such
* If S delays in making his choice, B cannot exercise the
communication has been made is upon him who made the
right because it is not expressly granted to him.
choice.
Note: The debtor’s right of choice is not absolute.
- law is silent as to form of notice; notice of choice can be
Meaning to say:
expressly which can be orally/written/implied
The right of choice of the debtor is subject to limitations. Thus - Example:
(1)The debtor cannot choose those prestations which are: (a) S obliged himself to deliver to B his car, or his race
impossible, (b) unlawful, or (c) which could not have been the horse. S chose the car and properly informed B of his
object of the obligation. These prestations are void. However, choice.
their presence does not invalidate the obligation if it includes * The obligation becomes a simple obligation to deliver the
other undertakings otherwise free from such defects. car. As such, neither party can change the prestation
* the debtor’s right of choice is not extinguished altogether without the consent of the other. Of course, S or B may
but limited to remaining valid prestation. waive his right after a choice has been made. As general
Example: rule, all rights may be waived. (Art. 6)
D obliged himself to give C a particular horse or a stolen
cellphone or to create a website for C. Here, the
Article 1203. If through the creditor's acts, the debtor cannot In case of disagreement, the creditor must prove the value, or
make a choice according to the terms of the obligation, the latter which thing last disappeared or which service last became
may rescind (revoke) the contract with damages. (n) impossible.
- Rescission is not automatic, and the debtor may not Article 1205. When the choice has been expressly given to
rescind the contract and perform the other prestations the creditor, the obligation shall cease to be alternative from
(jurisdiction of the supreme court) the day when the selection has been communicated to the
When debtor may rescind contract. debtor.
If through the creditor’s fault, the debtor cannot make a choice Until then the responsibility of the debtor shall be governed by
according to the terms of the obligation, the debtor is given the the following rules:
right to rescind the contract and recover damages. (1) If one of the things is lost through a fortuitous event, he
Example: shall perform the obligation by delivering that which the creditor
D borrowed from C P10,000. It was agreed that instead should choose from among the remainder, or that which
of P10,000, D could deliver to C a specific cellphone, remains if only one subsists;
computer or tablet. (2) If the loss of one of the things occurs through the fault of
- If through C’s fault the cellphone is destroyed, then D the debtor, the creditor may claim any of those subsisting, or
can rescind the contract if he wants. In case of the price of that which, through the fault of the former, has
rescission, D must return the P10,000 plus interest. C, disappeared, with a right to damages;
in turn, must pay D the value of the cellphone plus (3) If all the things are lost through the fault of the debtor, the
damages. choice by the creditor shall fall upon the price of any one of
- However, instead of rescinding the contract, D may them, also with indemnity for damages.
choose the computer or tablet with a right to recover The same rules shall be applied to obligations to do or not to do
the value of the cellphone with damages. If D chooses in case one, some or all of the prestations should become
the cellphone, then his obligation to C is extinguished. impossible. (1136a)
On the other hand, C is not liable for damages. Rules in case of loss before creditor made a choice. (Here, the
choice belongs to the creditor.)
Article 1204. The creditor shall have a right to indemnity (1) When a thing is lost through a fortuitous event
(security) for damages when, through the fault of the debtor, all Example:
the things which are alternatively the object of the obligation S obliged himself to deliver to B a particular horse,
have been lost, or the compliance of the obligation has become cellphone, computer or tablet. If the horse is lost
impossible. through a fortuitous event, B can choose from
The indemnity shall be fixed taking as a basis the value among the remainder. If three of the items are lost,
of the last thing which disappeared, or that of the service which then B must give that which remains.
last became impossible. (2) When a thing is lost through debtor’s fault.
Damages other than the value of the last thing or Example:
service may also be awarded. (1135a) If the loss of the horse occurs through the fault of S, B
Effects of loss of objects of obligation. (The right of choice may claim item either the cellphone, computer or tablet
belongs to the debtor.) with a right to damages, or the price of lost horse also
1. Some of the objects - If some of the objects of the obligation with a right to damages.
have been lost or have become impossible even through the (3) When all the things are lost through debtor’s fault
debtor’s fault, then the debtor is not liable since he has the right Example:
of choice and the obligation can still be performed. If all the items are lost through the fault of S, then B
2. All of the objects - If all of them have been lost or have can demand the payment of the price of any one (not
become impossible through the debtor’s fault, the creditor shall necessarily the last object that was lost) of them with a
have the right to indemnity for damages (value of the last thing right to indemnity for damages.
that was lost + damages) since the obligation can no longer be (4) When all the things are lost through a fortuitous event
complied with. If the cause of the loss is fortuitous event, then Example:
the obligation is extinguished. The obligation of S shall be extinguished if all the items
-All except one is lost due to the fault of the debtor and the which are alternatively the object of the obligation are
remaining prestation was lost due to fortuitous event= lost through a fortuitous event. In this case, Article
extinguished 1174 shall apply.
-All except one is lost due to fortuitous event and the remaining
prestation was lost due to the debtor’s fault= payment for Article 1206. When only one prestation has been agreed
damages upon, but the obligor may render another in substitution, the
Example: obligation is called facultative.
S agreed to deliver item one, two, or item three. The loss or deterioration of the thing intended as a substitute,
* If item one is lost through the fault of S, he can still select through the negligence of the obligor, does not render him
either item two or item three. The loss of item one and two liable. But once the substitution has been made, the obligor is
with or without the fault of S will reduce the obligation to a liable for the loss of the substitute on account of his delay,
simple one. negligence or fraud. (n)
* If all items are lost through his fault, liability will attach; if *Article 1206 deals with facultative obligation.
through a fortuitous event, the obligation will be Meaning of facultative obligation.
extinguished. A facultative obligation is one where only one prestation has
been agreed upon but the obligor may render another in
Basis of indemnity. substitution.
The value of the last thing which disappeared (obligation to give) Example:
or the value of the service that last became impossible “I will give you my cellphone but I may give my tablet as
(obligation to do). a substitute.”
* In this obligation, only the cellphone is due. Hence, its loss 4. Each debtor is liable only for the proportionate part of the
through my fault will make me liable. debt.
Effects of Loss. 5. Each creditor is entitled only to a proportionate part of the
(1) Before substitution - If the principal thing is lost through a credit.
fortuitous event, the obligation is extinguished. If the 6. In a joint obligation, the rule is “to each his own”.
principal thing is lost through the debtor’s fault, he should
be liable for damages. Illustration 1: D1 and D2 borrowed P10,000 from C.
If the substitute is lost due to fortuitous event or debtor’s fault, 1. How much can C collect from D1?
there is no additional obligation because it is not yet due. Answer: P5,000.00. There as a many debts as there are debtors.
2. Suppose D2 is insolvent or has passed away, how much can C
(2) After substitution - If the principal thing is lost, the debtor collect from D1?
is not liable whatever may be the cause of the loss, because Answer: P5,000. D2’s debt is distinct and separate from D1’s
it is no longer due. debt. Hence, D1 is not bound to shoulder D2’s debt.
If the substitute is lost, the liability of the debtor depends upon 3. Suppose D1 paid C P5,000, can D1 ask a share or
whether the loss is due to his fault. (Fortuitous event= reimbursement from D2?
extinguished; Debtor’s fault= pay for damages) Answer: No, because D1’s debt is distinct and separate from
Alternative and Facultative Obligations Distinguished D2’s debt.
Illustration 2: D borrowed P10,000 from C1 and C2.
1. How much can C1 collect from D?
Answer: P5,000.00. There as a many credits as there are
creditors.
2. Suppose C1 is able to collect P5,000 from D, how much, if any,
should C1 share with C2?
Answer: None, because C1’s credit is distinct and separate from
C2’s credit.
*Take Note: If the obligation is silent or does not
specify whether the debtors are joint or solidary, they
are presumed to be joint only.
Confusion/Merger- The meeting in one person of the qualities of Compensation is the extinguishment to the concurrent amount
creditor and debtor with respect to the same obligation. of the debts of two persons who, in their own right, are
reciprocally principal debtors and creditors of each other.
• Prevent unnecessary lawsuits/cases that may be filed in court case because of the lack of identity of the kind and quality of the
through the mutual extinction by operation of law in existing in rice due.
concurrent debts. (quits)
(3) The two debts are due and demandable.
EXAMPLE: - the time of payment has arrived, or conditions have
been fulfilled
A owes B the amount of P1,000.00. B owes A the amount of - it is not required/necessary that the debts have the
P700.00. Both debts are due and payable today. Here same due date, it is enough that both debts are due. -a
compensation takes place partially, that is, to the concurrent debt is demandable if it can be collected through court
amount of P700.00. So, A shall be liable to B for only P300.00. (prescribed/illegal= not demandable)
(partial compensation)
EXAMPLE:
If the two debts are of the same amount, there is total (1) A owes B P10,000 due today. B owes A P10,000 payable
compensation. (Art. 1281.) The two debts are extinguished due two weeks from today. Legal compensation will not take
without actual transfer of money between the parties place because only the debt of A is due which is today.
Compensation Confusion If A has not paid his debt after two weeks, legal compensation
Number of can take place because both debts are due.
Creditors/Debtors Two persons involved, each of whom
is a debtor and creditor of the other Only one person (2) A owes B, P20,000. B owes A, 20,000. B’s debt to A has
who is creditor and debtor of himself already prescribed, the right to collect on the part of B has
Number of already prescribed through lapse of time. Legal compensation
Obligations Two obligations One obligation will not take place because it is no longer demandable by reason
Payment Indirect Payment Impossibility of prescription.
A obliged himself to deliver to B 10 sacks of rice while B obliged (2) A owes B, 10 sacks of milagrosa rice, which is stored in the
himself to deliver to A 10 sacks of corn. Compensation will not warehouse of A. Now, C owes A, 10 sacks of milagrosa rice. T, a
also take place because the things due are not of the same kind. third person sued A to recover the 10 sacks of milagrosa rice
stored in A’s warehouse because they were allegedly stolen by A.
A owes B 10 sacks of milagroso rice. B owes A any 10 sacks of
sinandomeng rice. There can be no legal compensation in this
Legal compensation cannot take place because the debt of A is The contract between A and T is known as assignment, with B
subject to a legal controversy, that should not be the case that known as the assignor and T as the assignee. A will have to make
legal compensation can take place. the payment to T because the right of B is already transferred to
T.
(b) Conventional or voluntary. — when it takes place by
agreement of the parties (Art. 1282.); • When compensation takes effect by operation of law or
-an exception to the general rule that only debts which automatically, the debts are extinguished to the concurrent
are due and demandable can be compensated. -Voluntary amount. (Art. 1290.)
or conventional compensation includes any compensation which
takes place by agreement of the parties even if all the requisites • If subsequently, the extinguished debt is assigned by the
for legal compensation are not present -It has no special creditor to a third person, the debtor can raise the defense of
requisites. compensation with respect to the debt.
- It is sufficient that the contract of the parties, which declares
the compensation, is valid. • The remedy of the assignee is against the assignor
(c) Judicial. — when it takes place by order from a court in a • It is well-settled that the rights of the assignee are not
litigation. (Art. 1283.) any greater than the rights of the assignor since the assignee is
-Strictly speaking, judicial compensation is merely a form of legal merely substituted in the place of the assignor.
or voluntary compensation when declared by the courts by
virtue of an action by one of the parties, who refuses to admit it, EXAMPLE:
and by the defense of the other who invokes it (8 (1) Compensation before assignment
Manresa 403.); - if he consents to the assignment before it was
-A party may set off his claim for damages against his obligation made/subsequently , he can no longer raise the defense of
to the other party by proving his right to said damages and the compensation = no compensation.
amount thereof.
EXAMPLE:
EXAMPLE:
A owes B 3,000 due yesterday. B owes A 1,000 due also
(1) A owes B, 50,000. B sued A for collection. One week yesterday. Both debts are extinguished up to the amount of
after A was sued, B through negligence rammed his jeep in the 1,000. Hence, A still owes B 2,000 today. If B assigns his right to
parked car of A which caused scratches. A can claim damages for C, the latter can collect only 2,000 from A.
the scratches in his car. A pleads damage in counterclaim and can
prove that it was due to the wrongful act of B and the amount However, if A gave his consent to the assignment before it was
thereof. The court may order the offsetting of the amount of A’s made or subsequently, A loses the right to set up the defense of
debt to B. compensation.
(2) A owes B, 50,000. When B went to the house of A, A was So, A will be liable to C for 3,000 but can still collect 1,000 owed
hesitant to pay his obligation. Out of anger, B threw in front of by B. In other words, the compensation shall be deemed not to
the face A, the most precious antique jars in the house of A, have taken place.
which cost 50,000. A sued B for damages aside from criminal
action. The amount of loan and amount of damages which
respect to the jar is the same. (2) Assignment with the consent of debtor.
- if the debtor reserved his right to compensation=
The court can order the offsetting of the amount of debt of A to B compensation will take place
with respect to the amount of damages which A is claiming - the debtor consents= no compensation EXAMPLE:
against B with virtue of the antique jar.
A owes B P3,000.00 due November 15. B owes A P1,000.00 due
(d) Facultative. — when it can be set up only by one of the November 15. B assigned his right to C on November 1 with the
parties. (see Arts. 1287, par. 1; 1288.) consent of A.
- one of the parties can set up or has the right to claim or
oppose compensation On November 15, A cannot set up against C, the assignee, the
compensation which would pertain to him against B, the
Art. 1285 Where Compensation has Taken Place After assignor.
Assignment
- Identify if the compensation has happened/took place In other words, A is liable to C for P3,000.00 but he can still
before the assignment collect the P1,000.00 debt of B.
ASSIGNMENT
- assignment of credits; a contract whereby a person However, if A, while consenting to the assignment, reserved his
(assignor) transfers his right/credit/actions against a third person right to the compensation, he would be liable only for P2,000.00
to another to C
person (assignee), certain in money or its equivalent/gratuitous
(2) Assignment with the knowledge but without the consent of
EXAMPLE: debtor
- without his consent= compensation
A owes B, 10,000. The debt is evidenced by promissory note - not yet due/demandable/ not matured= no
executed by A, payable to B. B assigns the note to T, with the compensation
notice to A.
EXAMPLE:
• Similarly, a depositor has every right to set-off his
A owes B P1,000.00 due November 1. B owes A P2,000.00 money deposit with a bank against the loans he had obtained
due November 10. A owes B P1,000.00 due November 15 (not from said bank.
yet due, cannot be compensation). A assigned his right to C on
November 12. A notified B but the latter did not give his consent EXAMPLE:
to the assignment.
A deposited his money in a bank, 100,000. A contract of loan is
How much can C collect from B? made and legal compensation can take place because it is not a
B can set up the compensation of debts on November 10 contract of deposit.
which was before the cession on November 12. (par. 2.) There
being partial compensation, the assignment is valid only up to A has a loan, the bank can claim compensation and has the right
the amount of P1,000.00. to set-off deposits that you have in the bank against
loan/indebtness which you owe the bank.
But B cannot raise the defense of compensation with respect to
the debt of A due on November 15 which has not yet matured. A can also claim compensation, by saying, “I have a deposit in
So, on November 12, B is liable to C for P1,000.00. Come your bank, and I have a loan, so we can have compensation
November 15, A will be liable for his debt of P1,000.00 to B. and you can set off it to my loans in your bank”
- Legal compensation is not allowed by law (2) A owes B P1,000.00. B, in turn, owes A the amount of
- Apply in cases whereby only one party has the right to P1,000.00 representing the value of a ring deposited by A with B,
claim or oppose the compensation (facultative compensation; which B failed to return.
takes because legal compensation
cannot take place) In this case, B, who is the depositary, cannot claim legal
compensation even if A fails to pay his obligation. The remedy of
1. Where one of the debts arises from a depositum. B is to file an action against A for the recovery of the amount of
P1,000.00.
DEPOSIT- a person receives a thing belonging to another with the
obligation of safely keeping and returning the same 2. Where one of the debts arises from a commodatum.
• A bank deposit is not a depositum as defined above. It is Commodatum is a gratuitous contract whereby one of the
really a loan contract which creates the relationship of debtor parties delivers to another something not consumable so that
and creditor. the latter may use the same for a certain time and return it.
• Legal compensation can take place.
• Money is not kept safely by the bank (safekeeping) but The purpose is for use by the person who received the thing
used in other purposes, and so it is not the money that you while having the obligation to return the same thing.
deposited that the bank would return later.
• The bank is not obliged to keep the money safely and The lender that lends the non-consumable thing may claim or
give the same money which you deposited (not the same serial oppose compensation, but this not true for the borrower.
number).
• As a general rule, a bank has a right of set-off of the Borrower is not allowed to claim compensation, but lender can
deposits in its hands for the payment of any indebtedness to it claim for compensation/setting off because it will breach trust
on the part of a depositor. and confidence.
(4) Where one of the debts consists in civil liability arising from a
EXAMPLE: penal offense
A is obliged to give B a specific cellphone. Later, B borrowed from - offender is not allowed to claim compensation, but the
A the same cellphone, that A is obliged to give to B. If A demands offended party can claim/oppose compensation.
the return of the cellphone that B borrowed.
REASON: satisfaction of such obligation is imperative
The obligation of B is to return it, and he cannot claim
compensation on the ground that A owes him the cellphone, EXAMPLE:
because his obligation to return arises from a contract of A owes B P1,000.00. B stole the ring of A worth P1,000.00. Here,
commodatum. compensation by B is not proper.
If B demands the delivery of the cellphone that A owes him, A But A, the offended party, can claim the right of compensation.
may claim compensation.
The prohibition in Article 1288 pertains only to the accused but
(3) Where one of the debts arises from a claim for support due not to the victim of the crime
by gratuitous title.
W filed for annulment against H, and after trial and hearing, and
H was ordered by the court to give monthly support of 50,000
payable every first day of the month to W.
Support in arrears
H did not give support for the month of January, and it is already
March.