Deparment oe 800'Com Sur fecor ‘Republika ng Pilipinas Kagawaran ng Cdubasyon Rehiyon V_ ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Office of the Schools Division Superintendent MEMORANDUM To: Assistant Schools Division Superintendents Chief Education Supervisors Education Program Supervisors Public Schools District Supervisors. Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads All others conceyned FROM: NORMA B. SAMANTELA, CESO V Schools Division Superintendent SUBJECT: FINALIZATION AND PRESENTATION ON THE PREPARATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN: SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) FOR SY 2023-2028 DATE: March 5, 2024 1. Relative to Regional Memorandum No. 164 s. 2024 dated February 13, 2024, and following DepEd Order no. 024, series 2022 titled Adoption of the Basic Education Development Plan 2030, the SDO Camarines Sur -SGOD Planning and Research Section will conduct a Finalization and Presentation of Strategic Plan: School Improvement Plan (SIP) for SY 2023-2028 to selected Core SIP Team on March 12, 2024, 1:00 pm at the Bulwagan ng Karunungan, 3" Floor Division Office, San Jose, Pili, Camarines Sur. 2. This activity aims to: a. ensure the alignment of the schools’ strategic plans with the Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP), DepEd’s MATATAG Agenda, Regional Development Plan (REDP), and Division Education Development Plan (DEDP); b. guide the selected school heads in the finalization and appraising of their strategic plans in the school aligned to the Division Development Plan (DEDP}; assess SIP using the Appraisal tool by the Assessors team; and submit the finalized and presented strategic plan of school improvement plan (SIP) as an output of the workshop. ao 3, The SIP Core Team shall bring a laptop, extension wire, and hard copy of the SIP for signature of the Schools Division Office Planning Team (SDOPT) headed by ASDS in SGOD. The School Management Monitoring and Evaluation (SMME) will conduct a quality assessment using the SIP appraisal tool. 3d0 CAMSUR: Leading Ch‘Republika ng Pilipinas Kagawaran ng Coukaspon Rehiyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAKRALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR 4. The expected participants in this activity are the Schools Division Office Planning Team, SEPS and Planning Officer of Planning and Research Section, SEPS in School Management Monitoring and Evaluation (SMME), the selected six (6) school heads and designated School Planning Officer (SPO) who would oversee the roll-out and the implementation of the SIP crafting for six (6) years. Teachers are not allowed to attend/or alternate representatives of the school heads. This serves also as a travel order/locator slip of the listed participants. 5. The Schools Division Office Planning Team which is composed of (a) the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent; (b) the School Governance and Operations Division Chief; () the Curriculum and Implementation Division Chief; (d) Public Schools District Supervisor; (e) Division Budget Officer; (9) Planning Officer shall perform the final evaluation of the submitted School Improvement Plan from the school to the division office. 6. _ Likewise, the School Planning Team (SPT) comprises (a) a School Head; (b) a student representative; (c) a teacher representative; (d) a parent representative; (e) a Barangay /LGU representative; (f) a member of BDRRMC; (g) member of School Child Protection Committee; (h) Representative from School Governance Council (SGC); (i) Designated Planning Coordinator; (j) Designated Planning Officer /Designated finance officer/BEIS Coordinator; (I) For IUs: disbursing officer, senior bookkeeper. 7. The submission deadline of SIP SY 2023-2028 will be on or before March 15, 2024, through the email address haz jeped.gov.ph. 8. The enclosures are the following: a. Enclosure 1: List of Participants b. Enclosure 2: Composition of Schools Division Office Planning Team (SDOPT) and School Planning Team (SPT) c. Enclosure 3: School Improvement Plan (SIP) Template d. Enclosure 4: School Improvement Plan (SIP} Appraisal Tool 9. Food and travel expenses incurred relative to the conduct of this activity shall be charged to the MOOE and local funds subject to the usual accounting and auditing rules and regulations. 10. Wide and immediate dissemination of this memorandum is earnestly desired. Mea olaa aeons hse ee rr ce Page 2 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Bagawaran ng Chukaspon Rehiyon V TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Enclosure No, 1 to Unrumbered Memorandum dated March 5, 2024- List of Participants LIST OF PARTICIPANTS TO THE FINALIZATION AND PRESENTATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN: SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP) SY 2023-2028 March 12, 2024, 1:00 PM Bulwagan ng Karunungan Chairperson: PEDRO J. PELONIO Co- Chairperson: HAZEL M. SALCEDO Member: EVA J. BARCIA - SIP CORE TEAM Name Position/ Designation | FE F. PERALTA PRINCIPAL IL BULA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT NERIO MELANO M. SIBULO Til | PRINCIPALT ‘CAMALIGAN NATIONAL _ HS, CAMALIGAN DISTRICT GREGORIA V. OLAYON MASTER TEACHER | MEDROSO MENDOZA I/SCHOOL HEAD —_| NHS, CALABANGA DISTRICT NELIFER P. MELCHOR PRINCIPAL IT ‘COLACLING NATIONAL, HIGH SCHOOL, LUPI { DISTRICT WILMA T. NAVO PRINCIPAL I FABRICA ELEMENTARY | SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT | DEMOSTHENES B. VIBANDOR | PRINCIPAL ‘STO.NINO INTEGRATED ! SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT SCHOOL PLANNING OFFICER (SPO) Name Position/— School/Office Designation | LEANE R. ANTANG HEAD TEACHERT | BULA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT | NAPOLEON M. SARAZA HEAD TEACHERT | CAMALIGAN NATIONAL | - HS, CAMALIGAN DISTRICT YVONE B. VILLADAREZ ADMINISTRATIVE | MEDROSO MENDOZA | ASSISTANT NHS, CALABANGA, | DISTRICT MELANIE M. BUSTAMANTE | REGISTRAR ‘COLACLING NATIONAL | HIGH SCHOOL, LUPI DISTRICT IRENE B. HAGUPIT ADMINISTRATIVE | FABRICA ELEMENTARY | OFFICER I SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT RAQUEL E. DELOVERGES ~| HEAD TEACHER STO.NINO INTEGRATED | SCHOOL, BULA DISTRICT _| Page 3 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Kagawaran ng Edukaspon Rehiyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Enclosure No. 2 to Unnumbered Memorandum dat ‘and School Planning Team COMPOSITION ited March 5, 2024- Composition of SDO Planning Team OF PLANNING TEAMS SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE PLANNING TEAM: Name Position [Chairman Norma B. Samantela, | Schools Division CESO V Superintendent | Co-chair: | Arvin R. Sese Assistant Schools Z Division Superintendent ‘Members: ‘Pedro J. Pelonio Chief of SGOD and Mariben D. Berja Chief of CID and heads of its units, Technical Secretariat | Eva J Barcia ‘SGOD (Planning Uni Lead: Members: Office of the | Elmer V, Tena Finance unit (Budget Schools Division unit /section) Superintendent-Finance | unit (Budget unit/section) and Curriculum —_ and Instruction Division (CID) ‘SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM Position Chair: School Head Members: Student representative, teacher representative _ parent representative ‘Barangay/LGU representative member of BDRRMC, member of School Child Protection Committee, Representative from School Governance Council (SGC) and other relevant stakeholders. Technical Lead: Secretariat Designated Planning Coordinator for the formulation of SIP and AIP Members: |For implementing units (Us) Designated finance officer Designated Planning Officer, BEIS Coordinator disbursing officer senior bookkeeper Page 4 of 1Republika ng Pilipinas ‘bul 2 DepED narra Ww AcoNc PLIPINAS Page 5 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Bagawaran ng Eoukaspon Rehiyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR ENDORSEMENT ‘This is to certify our collective approval and support the implementation of the Eahanced School Improvement Plan (ESIP) which contains our aspirations for our school. Signed on Date “ ‘SchooyAddress: SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM “sec President ~~ SPTA President "Faculty President ‘School Child Protection Coordinator Chairman, BDRRMC___Chairman, Committee on Education Planning Coordinator/Officer ‘88G/SPG President ‘School Head Public School District Supervisor Chief, SGOD Recommending Approval: Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Approved by: Schools Division Superintendent Page 6 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Kagawaran ng €dukaspon Rehiyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR GOO 2 PIP eri). o4 Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region _ DIVISION awards this “Chnaplate of Heptancs (NAME OF SCHOOL) for having successfully complied and met the requirements and standards of the Department of Education as mandated by DepEd Order 44, s. 2015. Given on the day of 20__. Schools Division Superintendent —_— re) Page 7 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Bagawaran ng Edukaspon Rehiyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Aenea Aen ENHANCED SCHOOL Naar ATE Se Prete Pret Dg a a ae uu ~ a Gti aes ius ne CR pa het ‘ee sini se Tr Aira ENHANCED SCHOOL Mee eae a =S_..” ce Dae mene Page 8 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Ragawaran ng Edukaspon Rehiyon V TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Pree Ne) 2OXK-20XX Mer v Gea nce es esse) AO ee erthes SIP 20**-20** my & Page 9 of IIRepublika ng Pilipinas: Kagawaran ng Cdukaspon Vv. ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR Enclosure No, 4 to Unnumbered Memorandum dated March 5, 2024- SIP Appraisal Tool ‘SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN APPRAISAL TOOL ‘Assessment Criteria ‘Assessment Remarks the way basic education services will be provided 7A Sip is CONTEXT. SPECIFIC. The SIP describes the environment and sector surrounding school. Context specific means the plan is able to consider the different environmental factors that may influence or affect T, School's Current Situation. Does the SIP Te Yes describes the Basic Education Situational Analysis | (b)Some Room for services? Improvement (c) No 2, School Context. Does the SIP describes the (a) Yes ‘school's physical environment, immediate (b}Some Room for community, and linkages as well as the Improvement environment and sector surrounding the school__| (c) No ieee ‘a. LOU plans and development in the area. Does the SIP describe the LGUs’ vision and development goals and future plans in the city/province that ‘may influence or affect the school’s provision of, basic education ‘.conomic growth and developments in the area. | (a) Yew Does the SIP describe the industries in the (b}Some Room for city/province that may influence or affect the Improvement | school’s provision of basic education services? (No 4. Natural and human-induced natural hazards. | (a) Yes Does the SIP describe the threat to leamers, DepEd | (b)Some Room for personnel, and school properties? Improvement {c) No _ 5. Key Stakeholders, Does the SIP describe the {a) Yes efforts of other public agencies and major (o)Some Room for stakeholders os basic education? Improvement (c) No {actors that contributed or affected the efficient and ef B. SiPis EVIDENCE-BASED. The SIP identifies and describes the challenges and issues on basic ‘education in the Division, Discussion includes learners’ performance, their challenges, and the operational learners. The DEDP should be able to highlight the main factors that will explain past performance. lective provision of basic education services to all T, Does the SIP identify the main underlying causes | (a) Yeo {or its key challenges and issues in ACCESS? {(b}Some Room for Improvement (ol No 2 Does the SIP identify the main underlying causes | (a) Yes for its key challenges and issues in EQUITY? (b)Some Room for Improvement {o) No Ei 3. Does the SIP identify the main underlying causes | (a) Yes Tor its key challenges and issues in READING? {(b)Same Room for Improvement : (1 No oe Does the SIP identify the main underiying causes | (a) Yes for its key challenges and issues in LEARNING? | (b)Some Room for Improvement (q)No 3, Does the SIP identify the main underlying causes | (a) Yes for its key challenges and issues in DISASTER RISK | (b)Some Room for REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT? Improvement (No 6. Does the SIP identify the main underiving causes | (a) Yes for its key challenges and issues in LEARNERS (b)Some Room for WELL-BEING? Improvement z (a.No a Page 10 of 11Republika ng Pilipinas Kagawaran ng Edukaspon iyon V ‘TANGGAPAN NG MGA PAARALANG PANSANGAY NG CAMARINES SUR 7. Does the SIP identify the main underlying causes | (a) Yes {or its key challenges and issues in GOVERNANCE? | (b)Some Room for Improvement (c) No adequate to address the major challenges and issues ‘C. SIP is DEMAND-DRIVEN. Ail proposed strategies and outputs identified in the SIP are necessary and identified in the situation analysis section. 1. Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on ACCESS (described in the situation, {(b]Same Room for analysis) addressed in the SIP? improvement (e) No. 3 Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on EQUITY (described in the situation (b)Some Room for analysis) addressed in the SIP? Improvement (o) No = ‘3 Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on READING (described in the situation (b}Some Room for analysis) addressed in the SIP? Improvement {fo} No fre the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on LEARNING (described in the situation _| (b)Some Room for analysis) addressed in the SIP? Improvement {) No 5. Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND. (O}Some Room for MANAGEMENT (described in the situation analysis) | Improvement addressed in the SIP? (No 6. Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on LEARNERS’ WELL-BEING (described in _| (bJSome Room for the situation analysis) addressed in the SIP? Improvement ‘ (e) No _ _ 7. Are the underlying causes of the challenges and | (a) Yes issues on GOVERNANCE (described in the situation | (b)Some Room for analysis) addressed in the SIP? Improvement (o) No | D. SiP is FEASIBLE. Feasible means the plan can be proposed strategies and outputs are aligned with the implementation control mechanisms are identified in implemented. The targets are achievable, the desired outcomes and intermediate outcomes, and the plan. 1. Does the SIP include an indicative (a) Yes implementation plan highlighting the major (6}Some Room for milestones of the SIP? Improvement (c) No 2. Does the SIP describe the implementation and | (a) Yes control mechanism for managig results? (b}Some Room for Improvement (o) No 3, Does the SiPinchide how the DepEd region and | (a) Yes SDO wil! manage and mitigate the implementation | (b)Some Room for risks? Improvement {c) No Recommendations: Checked and Reviewed: Public Schools District Supervisor Rater Date: Page 11 of II