Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Course Objectives:
This course is intended to provide students with core understanding of web development hence,
the course learning outcomes (CLO) are:
Table 2 Course Learning Outcomes
6. Curriculum Design:
This course will cover core concepts in web development. The topics are presented below:
Week Topic
1 Introduction to the world wide web (WWW) and HTML
2 HTML fundamentals
3 Layout of the webpage using Cascading Style Sheet
(CSS)
4 JavaScript fundamentals
5 Dynamic web page using JavaScript
SQL
6 Introduction to PHP
Web hosting and publishing
7 General review
Several teaching techniques and methods will be used to effectively facilitate the learning
process of this course such as Lectures, Tutorials, Group Discussions, and Project.
8. Assessment:
Various assessment techniques will be used to assess students’ understanding of the module. The
breakdown of the weight of each element is:
As for the marking criteria for each assessment technique, each has a rubric that demonstrates the
mark/band the students can achieve in this
Suitability of the answer Answer does not Answer addresses the Clear and logical Question is well-
address the question. questions with limited answer that addresses answered with critical
20 marks improvisation on the the question and analysis of the core
answer. attempts to provide concepts covered in the
critical analysis of core exam.
concepts covered in the
exam.
Understanding of the Lacks theoretical Shows good Shows good Shows solid
core concepts understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the core
core concepts covered core concepts and its subject area. There is a concepts with strong link
20 marks in the exam. application in practice good link between the between theory and
core concepts and practice.
practice.
Mark
0-19 20-29 30-35 36-40
(Out of 40 marks)
Understanding Lacks Shows some Shows good Shows solid understanding of the core
of the core understanding of understanding of core understanding of the concepts covered in the exam
concepts core concepts concepts covered in the subject area and core
covered in the exam. concepts covered in
exam. the exam.
Mark
(Out of 20 0-10 11-14 15-17 18-20
marks)
Understanding Lacks Shows some Shows good Shows solid understanding of the core
of the core understanding of understanding of core understanding of the concepts covered in the exam
concepts core concepts concepts covered in the subject area and core
covered in the exam. concepts covered in
exam. the exam.
Mark
(Out of 15 0-6 7-9 10-12 13-15
marks)
Rubric for Project
Criteria/band Fail Marginal Merit Distinction
Understanding Lacks understanding of Shows some understanding of Shows good Shows solid understanding
of the theory the core concepts the core concepts covered in understanding of the of the core concepts
covered in the the assignment. subject area. covered in the assignment.
assignment.
Mark
(Out of 20 0-10 11-14 15-17 18-20
marks)
Understanding Lacks Shows some Shows good Shows solid understanding of the core
of the core understanding of understanding of core understanding of the concepts covered in the exam
concepts core concepts concepts covered in the subject area and core
covered in the exam. concepts covered in
exam. the exam.
Mark
0 1-2 3-4 5
(Out of 5 marks)
Academic Integrity:
Students must refrain from copying each other's work or using information without acknowledging
the source of this information (i.e., providing a reference and in-text citation). A Turnitin
plagiarism of 15-20% could result in a range of disciplinary measures ranging from written
warning to deductions of marks from the submitted work. However, if the submitted work exceeds
this percentage, the academic staff reserves the right to open a plagiarism investigation case. At
the initial investigation stage (before any formal allegation of academic misconduct is made) a
decision will be reached about whether the case constitutes plagiarism as opposed to poor
scholarship. Where an initial investigation is conducted, the case will be forwarded to the Students’
Violation Committee to take appropriate actions. If the case constitutes plagiarism, the student(s)
will be given a “0” mark for the entire module.
Late Assignments:
Assignments must be completed and submitted to me by the due date assigned by the module leader.
Failure to submit the assignment by the due date will automatically result in “0” mark given for this
assignment. If a student has an exceptional circumstance, they have to submit a mitigating
circumstances form to the module leader a week prior to the assignment due date. If the form is
approved, the student will receive an extra week to submit their work.