You are on page 1of 9

J Ornithol

DOI 10.1007/s10336-014-1088-y

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Aggression, body condition, and seasonal changes in sex-steroids


in four hummingbird species
Paulina L. González-Gómez • William S. Blakeslee •

Pablo Razeto-Barry • Rachel M. Borthwell •


Sara M. Hiebert • John C. Wingfield

Received: 24 September 2013 / Revised: 27 April 2014 / Accepted: 22 May 2014


Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2014

Abstract Hummingbirds present a unique combination hummingbirds. To validate the use of cloacal fluid (CF) for
between extremely high life costs and a number of efficient the study of sex steroids, steroid levels in plasma and CF
adaptations to fuel these demands. In addition to cognitive were correlated in Sephanoides sephaniodes. During the
abilities, territorial hummingbirds display aggressive reproductive season, Calypte. anna, Archilochus alexandri,
behaviors that allow for access to better food resources. In and Selasphorus rufus males showed high levels of T that
year-round territorial species, male–male territorial were positively correlated with aggression, but the rela-
aggression is similar between breeding and non-breeding tionship between T and body condition was not consistent
seasons; however, the endocrine mechanisms underlying across species. As expected, T levels in females were
control of territoriality during these distinct seasonal peri- significantly lower than in males in all seasons, however
ods may differ. In many species, testosterone (T) triggers still detectable. During the non-reproductive season, CF
increased aggression during the breeding season whereas DHEA of Calypte anna was high and positively correlated
territoriality in the non-breeding season can be regulated by with aggressive behaviors and body condition. Our results
circulating the biologically inert sex steroid precursor suggest that hummingbirds display aggressive behaviors
dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and converting it to T in that could be linked to different hormones during the
target tissues. The seasonal hormonal regulation of hum- breeding and non-breeding seasons.
mingbird territorial behavior has heretofore been unknown.
Our goal was to assess seasonal changes in sex steroids, Keywords Testosterone  Dehydroepiandrosterone 
territorial aggression levels, and body condition during Hummingbirds  Territoriality  Body condition 
reproductive and non-reproductive seasons in Seasonality  Aggression

Zusammenfassung
P. L. González-Gómez  W. S. Blakeslee 
R. M. Borthwell  J. C. Wingfield
Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, Aggressionsverhalten, Körperkondition und jahreszei-
University of California Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, tliche Schwankungen der Sexualsteroidspiegel bei vier
CA 95616, USA
Kolibriarten
P. L. González-Gómez (&)  P. Razeto-Barry
Instituto de Filosofı́a y Ciencias de la Complejidad (IFICC), Kolibris verbinden in einzigartiger Weise eine extrem
Los Alerces, 3024 Santiago, Chile kostspielige Lebensweise mit einer Reihe von Anpas-
e-mail: plgonzalezgomez@gmail.com
sungsleistungen, um ihren Energiebedarf effizient zu dec-
P. Razeto-Barry ken. Zusätzlich zu ihren kognitiven Fähigkeiten verfügen
Universidad Diego Portales, Vicerrectorı́a Académica, territoriale Kolibris über aggressive Verhaltensweisen, die
Manuel Rodrı́guez Sur 415, Santiago, Chile ihnen den Zugang zu besseren Nahrungsquellen sichern.
Bei Arten, die ganzjährig Reviere verteidigen, ist die ter-
S. M. Hiebert
Department of Biology, Swarthmore College, ritoriale Aggression zwischen Männchen zur Brutzeit
500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA ähnlich wie außerhalb; allerdings können sich die der

123
J Ornithol

Steuerung der Territorialität zugrunde liegenden endokri- In some hummingbirds species such as the Green-backed
nen Mechanismen während dieser jahreszeitlich klar ge- Firecrown hummingbird (Sephanoides sephaniodes) and
trennten Zeiträume unterscheiden. Bei vielen Arten löst the Annas hummingbird (Calypte anna), males display two
Testosteron (T) eine Zunahme des Aggressionsverhaltens strategies, territorial individuals, which actively defend
während der Brutsaison aus, wohingegen die Territorialität feeding resources by displaying aggressive behaviors, such
außerhalb der Brutzeit durch den Einsatz des biologisch as performing acrobatic aerial displays, vocalizing, and
inerten Sexualsteroid-Vorläufers Dehydroepiandrosteron chasing intruders and non-territorial individuals, which are
(DHEA) reguliert werden kann, welcher dann im Ziel- less aggressive and mostly opportunistic (González-Gómez
gewebe in T umgewandelt wird. Die jahreszeitliche hor- et al. 2011a; González-Gómez, non-published data). Pre-
monelle Steuerung des Territorialverhaltens bei Kolibris vious studies conducted by González-Gómez et al. (2011a)
war bislang unbekannt. Unser Ziel war es, jahreszeitliche showed that, when the cost of aggression is higher than the
Schwankungen des Spiegels von Sexualsteroiden, das benefit derived from the defended nectar sources, territorial
Ausmaß territorialer Aggression sowie die Körperkondi- behaviors cease. Therefore, it is hypothesized that territorial
tion der Kolibris jeweils während und außerhalb der Fort- males display a positive correlation between aggression and
pflanzungszeit zu ermitteln. Um die Eignung der body condition. Females, in contrast, are in general non-
Kloakenflüssigkeit (cloacal fluid, CF) für die Untersuchung territorial and either perform rapid intrusions into male
von Sexualsteroiden zu testen, wurden bei Sephanoides territories to raid high-quality resources (González-Gómez
sephaniodes die jeweiligen Steroidspiegel in Plasma und and Estades 2009) or are forced to forage in nectar-poor,
CF miteinander in Bezug gesetzt. Während der Fort- scattered resources (Kodric-Brown and Brown 1978;
pflanzungsperiode zeigten Männchen von C. anna, Ar- Temeles et al. 2005).
chilochus alexandri und Selasphorus rufus jeweils hohe Even though the behavioral patterns of male–male ter-
T-Spiegel, welche positiv mit dem Aggressionsverhalten ritorial aggression are similar between breeding and non-
korrelierten; das Verhältnis zwischen T und der Körper- breeding seasons in year-round territorial avian species,
kondition stimmte jedoch nicht bei allen Arten überein. there is extensive evidence showing that endocrine regu-
Erwartungsgemäß lagen die T-Spiegel bei den Weibchen lation mechanisms are different both seasons in most of
zu allen Jahreszeiten signifikant niedriger als bei den bird species (Hau et al. 2000; Wingfield et al. 2001;
Männchen, waren aber trotzdem nachweislich vorhanden. Wingfield and Soma 2002; Hau 2007; Goymann et al.
Außerhalb der Fortpflanzungszeit lag der CF-Wert für 2007). In the breeding season, it is well-known that tes-
DHEA bei Calypte anna hoch und korrelierte positiv mit tosterone (T) triggers an increase in male–male competi-
dem Aggressionsverhalten und der Körperkondition. Un- tion for territories and mates (Wingfield 1984; Ogawa et al.
sere Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass die von Kolibris gezeigten 1997). Possibly because high levels of testosterone could
aggressiven Verhaltensweisen zur Brutzeit beziehungswe- induce inappropriate behaviors outside of the breeding
ise außerhalb dieser an verschiedene Hormone gekoppelt season such as sexual behavior (Hau 2007), and could have
sein könnten. detrimental effects such as decreasing body mass and fat
stores (Wingfield and Soma 2002), alternatives to T have
been proposed outside of the breeding season. One possi-
bility could be dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) a biolog-
Introduction ically inert androgen precursor that can be converted to
biologically active sex steroids in the brain, thus, avoiding
Energy balance in hummingbirds is the result of a complex peripheral androgenization in a non-reproductive context
interplay between foraging behavior, physiological con- (Soma and Wingfield 2001; Soma et al. 2000, 2002). For
straints, cognitive performance, and environmental condi- example, simulated territorial intrusions performed with
tions (Hainsworth 1978; Suarez and Gass 2002). During spotted antbirds during the non-reproductive season (i.e.,
hovering, hummingbirds achieve some of the highest mass- birds had regressed gonads and low levels of androgen and
specific rates of aerobic metabolism known among verte- estrogen) showed that plasma DHEA was directly corre-
brates (Suarez 1992). Moreover, their small body size lated to the intensity of aggressive displays in both males
imposes high thermoregulatory costs (González-Gómez and females (Hau et al. 2000). Interestingly, hormonal
et al. 2011a). In order to fuel these high metabolic rates, regulation of hummingbird territorial behavior has hereto-
hummingbirds are able to remember the location and fore been unstudied. In this study, we aimed to assess
availability of the best resources (González-Gómez et al. seasonal changes in sex steroids, territorial aggression
2011b). In fact, recent studies suggest individuals with levels, and body condition during the reproductive and
better cognitive abilities exhibit higher energy intake non-reproductive seasons in four hummingbird species that
(González-Gomez et al. 2011c). defend food resources such as feeders and flowering trees

123
J Ornithol

and shrubs. In this context, we expected that (a) males females and 34 males); Rufous hummingbirds (Selas-
would have higher levels of testosterone than females phorus rufus, 3.15 ± 0.05 g), which were sampled from
during the reproductive season; (b) higher levels of March to April (migratory/reproductive season, n = 9
aggression in territorial males would be correlated with females and 6 males; see below); and Black-chinned
higher levels of T during the reproductive season and hummingbirds (Archilochus alexandri, 3.3 ± 0.06 g),
higher levels of DHEA during the non-reproductive season; which were sampled from April to late June (repro-
and (c) body condition would be positively related to ductive season, n = 15 females and 7 males) and from
DHEA or T levels in males. middle August to early September (non-reproductive
season, n = 8 females and 10 males).
In order to differentiate properly between territorial and
Methods non-territorial hummingbirds in a free-living environment,
a training period was conducted. Feeders were introduced
To assess DHEA and T levels in reproductive and non- into the surrounding environment and observations made
reproductive seasons and to determine the relationship every day between 8:00 and 11:30 a.m. for a week. Sub-
between hormone levels in plasma and CF samples, we jects that actively and consistently defended the feeders as
performed a laboratory study in Chile. Field studies were part of their territories for more than a day were classified
conducted in California, USA to evaluate the relationship as ‘‘territorial birds’’. Individuals that were able to use the
between hormones in CF, aggressive behaviors, and body feeders and occasionally displayed aggressive behaviors,
condition. All protocols were conducted according to but were not consistently observed defending or in the
Chilean laws, legal permits and the ethical committees of feeder’s surrounding area, were classified as ‘‘non-territo-
the Universities (IACUC Protocol No. 16095, Federal Bird rial’’ individuals. The artificial feeder consisted of a com-
Banding Permit No. 21535). mercial 50 ml syringe enveloped with red paper. Each
feeder was filled twice a day with 50 ml of 25 % w/w
Laboratory study sucrose solution. On the day of hormone sampling, the
feeder was set up in a cylindrical trap (30 cm diameter,
The study was carried out during April (non-reproductive 50 cm height) and aggressive territorial behaviors were
season, n = 5) and July (beginning of the reproductive observed for 1 h. All the observations were performed
season, n = 4) of 2009 in the Andean foothills at the between 7:00 and 11:00 a.m. to avoid behavioral variability
Mediterranean field station of the Universidad Católica de throughout the day. To assess the intensity of territorial
Chile at San Carlos de Apoquindo, central Chile (33°230 S, defense, an aggressiveness index described by González-
70°310 W, 1,100 m elevation above sea level). Subjects Gómez et al. (2011a) was utilized. In short, this index is
were male Green-backed Firecrown hummingbirds, Sep- composed of three different territorial behaviors: aggres-
hanoides sephaniodes (5.8 ± 0.19 g) that had established sive calls (vocalizations, V), chases (C), contacts (aggres-
and were actively defending feeding territories at the study sion, O), and their combinations weighted by the energy
site. Birds were caught with mist nets and housed for seven used in the aggressive action. We obtained that V/C/O has
days in individual mesh cages (1 9 1 9 1 m) under nat- the relations 2:3:5, and therefore, we constructed the fol-
ural photoperiod and temperature at the field site. Birds lowing aggressive index (AI):
were fed with nutritionally complete, artificial nectar
(Nektar Plus, Nekton USA, Clearwater, FL). All birds were AI ¼ V  2 þ C  5 þ VC  7 þ CO  8 þ VCO  10:
released after the study.
Birds were captured in the trap immediately after the
Field studies period of observation and CF was collected. All CF sam-
ples were collected in the first 3 min after capture. In
Observations and data collection were carried out from addition, body weight and tarsus length were recorded for
September 2010 to August 2011 during the reproductive each bird. Birds were weighed with a Pesola Micro-Line
and non-reproductive seasons, with the objective of Spring Scale (capacity 10 g) and measured with a Fowler
relating aggression, hormone levels, and body condition. (Brantford, Ontario) UltraCal Mark III Electronic Caliper.
The study was carried out in Chalk Hill and Baggins Body condition index was calculated as the residuals of the
End, Davis, CA. Subjects were free-living Anna’s regression between tarsus length and body mass
hummingbirds (Calypte anna, 4.82 ± 0.1 g), which were (R2 = 0.17, p = 0.03). Because of the volume constraint
sampled from September to early December (non- (i.e., each sample was roughly 30–50 lL), CF samples
reproductive season, n = 9 males) and from middle were analyzed for either T (reproductive season, Anna’s,
January to middle May (reproductive season, n = 13 Black-chinned and Rufus hummingbirds) or DHEA (non-

123
J Ornithol

reproductive season, Anna’s hummingbirds) using a individually maintained in collapsible tulle cages
radioimmunoassay (RIA) as described below. (60 9 60 9 60 cm); a CF sample was taken when the birds
were caught and then at 15 and 30 min, respectively. All
Blood samples birds were then released. Ad libitum sucrose solution (25 %
w/w) was offered in a syringe nectar feeder (see below), but
A 30 lL blood sample (roughly 5 % of body mass) was none of the birds fed; therefore, we were able to measure the
taken from the tarsus vein immediately after capture with a effect of dehydration on SG by comparing the SG of the
heparinized capillary tube. Tubes were sealed using sealing three CF samples collected during this procedure.
clay. This procedure was repeated 72 h later in order to
obtain the necessary volume to perform the hormone ana- Radioimmunoassay (RIA)
lysis (i.e., 25 lL of plasma). All birds maintained or
increased body mass during captivity and were released Plasma
after two days of the last blood collection when we were
confidant they had recovered. Samples were immediately After centrifugation, plasma samples (30 lL) were brought
centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 5 min and plasma was moved to 200 lL by adding distilled water. Samples were incu-
to a -20 °C freezer. bated overnight with [3H] steroid (i.e., testosterone or
DHEA, approximately 10,000 cpm, New England Nuclear)
Cloacal fluid samples for recovery determination. Steroid extraction was per-
formed with redistilled dichloromethane. Levels of T and
Samples were collected non-invasively by holding an 80 DHEA in plasma were assessed using one direct RIA per
lL microcapillary tube directly outside the cloaca. During each hormone (e.g., Wingfield et al. 1992). Intra-assay
aspiration, care was taken to avoid fecal masses. If a variation was 8.3 % and 7.9 %, respectively. A detection
sample had visible fecal masses, it was discarded. Samples limit of 0.19 and 0.20 ng/ml was used for DHEA and T,
were frozen immediately after collection in a -20 °C respectively.
freezer.
Cloacal fluid
Controlling for urine dilution
Prior to analysis of DHEA in cloacal fluid, a sulfatase
In order to control for the animal’s hydration state and its enzyme was used to hydrolyze DHEA-S into DHEA (Soma
possible effect on hormone levels, CF creatinine was used and Wingfield 2001). For this, 0.75 ml of 0.2 M sodium
as a reference for S. sephaniodes (Hiebert et al. 2000). acetate buffer (pH 5.0) with sulfatase (Sigma, partially
Creatinine concentration was determined with reagents purified from Helix pomata) was added to 30 lL of each
from Cayman Chemical (Cat No. 500701), following the sample; samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The
protocol described by Hiebert et al. (2000). following day 20 lL of [3H] DHEA was added to each
The levels of creatinine were undetectable in CF from the sample and samples were again incubated overnight.
other species in this study. Instead, specific gravity (here- DHEA extraction was performed with redistilled dichlo-
after SG) was used, which refers to the density (mass per romethane. RIA was performed as described previously
volume) of a sample in comparison to pure water (Arm- (Wingfield et al. 1992).
strong 2005). SG was determined using a clinical temper- Levels of T in CF were determined using direct RIA
ature compensated refractometer (Westover Scientific, with no extraction (Hiebert et al. 2000). Specifically, the
RHC200ATC). Unfortunately, due to the limited amount of sample was brought to 200 lL with distilled water; then
CF obtained from free-living hummingbirds, most of the 100 lL of [3H] T and 100 lL of T antiserum were added
samples were completely used in the unsuccessful creati- (Hiebert et al. 2000). Inter-assay variation was T 11.74 %.
nine assay and hormonal assay. Therefore, to assess the DHEA samples were run in one assay.
variation in urine dilution among free-living birds, an
additional study was performed. We recorded SG in the Statistical analysis
samples from free-living birds of the three studied species
for which we still had at least 10 lL (N = 43 out of a total To assess the effect of season (reproductive, non-repro-
of 94 samples). We compared the SG of these samples with ductive) on sex steroid levels, we performed a multivariate
that of CF from newly captured C. anna that were main- analysis of variance (MANOVA). Levels of hormones in
tained in captivity for 30 min and then released (n = 4). plasma and CF were correlated with a simple regression.
This study was performed during the reproductive season at Comparisons between territorial and non-territorial
the same dates as the general urine sampling. Birds were individuals were assessed utilizing the Mann–Whitney

123
J Ornithol

test since one of the distributions did not meet the nor- (0.30 ± 0.06 and 0.31 ± 0.09 mg/dL, respectively,
mality criterion. To assess the effect of DHEA on mean ± SE; CV = 0.37 %, Mann–Whitney U = 4.5,
aggressive behaviors and body condition, simple regres- P = 0.85). We found no significant relation between cre-
sions were performed. To assess the effect of species on atinine and body condition index (r2 = 0.08; F1,4 = 0.35;
hormone levels during the reproductive season, an P = 0.58).
ANOVA and a posteriori comparison among species Cloacal fluid SG for free-living hummingbirds showed
through Tukey HSD for unbalanced sample size was minimal variation among individuals and species
performed. Differences in T levels between reproductive (1.0037 ± 0.00038, mean ± SE; CV = 0.25 %,
and non-reproductive seasons within a species were range = 1.002–1.008). There was no difference between
compared using the Mann–Whitney test when they did the SG of CF from free-living birds,all three California
not meet conditions for normality and the t test when they species, and from C. anna that was kept in captivity at the
did. moment of capture (Mann–Whitney U = 78.5, p = 0.72)
To compare SG in CF between free-living and captive or after 15 min of fasting (1.008 ± 0.0019, p = 0.13) but
birds at the moment of capture, a Mann–Whitney test was significantly increased after 30 min (1.011 ± 0.002,
performed; in addition, a repeated measures Friedman Friedman ANOVA V2 = 6.53, P \ 0.05). On the basis of
ANOVA was used to compare SG over time (0, 15 and these results, we are confident that there is minimal vari-
30 min) in captive individuals. Analyses were performed ation in urine dilution in free-living hummingbirds. We,
with Statistica 6.0. Data are expressed as mean ± SE. therefore, did not incorporate a correction for urine dilution
in the analysis of CF obtained from birds in the field.

Results Field studies

Laboratory study Males

Plasma DHEA levels were significantly higher during the During the reproductive season, levels of T in CF of A.
non-reproductive season compared to the early reproductive alexandri were 3.5 times higher than in Anna’s and 2.6
season in S. sephanoides (Fig. 1a). In contrast, plasma T was times higher than in S. rufus (ANOVA (F(1,43) = 3.99,
not significantly different between seasons (Fig. 1a). Steroids P \ 0.05, Fig. 2). Levels of T in CF were significantly
in CF and plasma were positively correlated (Fig. 1b). greater in A. alexandri than in C. anna (Tukey HSD
P \ 0.05), but not significantly different between A. alex-
Urine dilution andri and S. rufus (Tukey HSD P = 0.15) or between S.
rufus and C. anna (Tukey HSD P = 0.91). Body condition
Creatinine in S. sephaniodes was not significantly different index was positively correlated with T levels in C. anna
between non-reproductive and reproductive seasons (Fig. 3a), but tended to be negatively correlated with T

Fig. 1 Levels of plasma DHEA in S. sephanoides (n = 9) were significantly different between seasons (U9 = 7.01, P = 0.60, a).
significantly higher during the non-reproductive season (black bars) Levels of plasma and urine creatinine referenced DHEA were
than during the early reproductive season (Mann–Whitney positively correlated (r 2 = 0.69, F(1,4) = 8.7, P \ 0.05, n = 5; b)
U9 = 2.32, P \ 0.05, white bars). In contrast, levels of T were not

123
J Ornithol

Females

Levels of T in CF were not significantly different across


species during the reproductive season (ANOVA
(F(1,21) = 2.78, P = 0.08, n = 24, Fig. 3). T levels in CF
from A. alexandri during the reproductive season
(5.65 ± 1.71 ng/ml) were nine times higher than during
the pre-migration period (0.57 ± 0.19 ng/ml, Mann–
Whitney U = 0.0, P \ 0.05, n = 14; data not shown).
During the reproductive season, we found levels of T in CF
significantly higher in males than in females in C. anna
(Mann–Whitney U = 100, P \ 0.01) and in A. alexandri
(U = 63, P \ 0.05), but not in S. rufus (U = 26,
P = 0.90).
Fig. 2 Testosterone levels in cloacal fluid (CF) during the reproduc-
tive season from males and females of three species of free-living
hummingbirds that were briefly captured to obtain the sample.
Asterisk significantly differences, P \ 0.05
Discussion

In this study, we showed a positive relationship between


levels in A. alexandri (Fig. 3b). In addition, T levels in CF sex steroids in plasma and their metabolites in CF
of A. alexandri were marginally positively correlated with (Fig. 1b). The small blood volumes available from hum-
the aggression index (Fig. 3c). mingbirds makes this technique especially useful for
During mid-August, in the non-reproductive pre- studying endocrine mechanisms in these birds. In com-
migration period, levels of CF T in A. alexandri were 29 parison to other birds (Wasser et al. 1993; Goyman 2005),
times lower than in the reproductive season hummingbirds present advantages to use this methodology
(0.79 ± 0.15 ng/ml CF mean ± SE, t = -2.26, P \ 0.05, because they have relatively stable diets (López-Calleja
n = 17; data not shown); however, the relation between and Bozinovic 2003; González-Gómez et al. unpublished
body mass and hormone levels during this period was not data) and ingest large amounts of water, which visibly
significant (R2 = 0.22, F(1,8) = 2.4, P = 0.16, n = 10). separates urine from feces.
During the non-reproductive season, DHEA in CF of
male C. anna was significantly higher in territorial than in Reproductive season
non-territorial males (Fig. 4a). DHEA was positively cor-
related with aggression index (Fig. 4b). Body condition As it was earlier reported by Stiles (1971), C. anna did not
was marginally positively related to DHEA levels defend feeding territories consistently during reproductive
(Fig. 4c). season, although they displayed inter-specific and intra-

Fig. 3 Body condition index was positively related to testosterone in (A. alexandri) was marginally positive during the reproductive season
cloacal fluid (CF) in Anna’s hummingbird (C. anna) during the (r2 = 0.75, F(1,3) = 8.13, P = 0.058, c), we found that body condi-
reproductive season (r2 = 0.211, F(1,23) = 7.435, P \ 0.05, a). tion tended to be lower in birds with higher T (r2 = 0.55, F(1,5) = 6.1,
Although the relation between T and aggression in Black-chinned P = 0.055, b)

123
J Ornithol

Fig. 4 In cloacal fluid (CF) obtained during the non-reproductive aggression was positively correlated with the DHEA levels in CF
season from free-living C. anna, DHEA was significantly higher in (F(1,7) = 6.29, P \ 0.05, n = 9, b). In addition, the body condition
territorial males than in non-territorial males (Mann–Whitney test index was marginally positively related with the hormone level in C.
U = 2.00, P \ 0.05, n = 9, a). During the non-reproductive season, anna (F(1,7) = 4.98, P = 0.06, n = 9, c)

specific aggressiveness. Therefore, we were unable to androgen levels, reproductive success, and energy expen-
relate territorial aggression levels with sex steroid levels; diture in long distance migrant hummingbirds.
we did, however, observe that higher levels of T were
positively related with body condition (Fig. 3a). This Non-reproductive season
finding supports the idea that aggression levels may be
related to resource acquisition and could provide an honest In S. sephanoides, plasma levels of DHEA were higher
signal for sexual selection, either directly, in displays of than T during the non-reproductive season (Fig. 1). How-
physical attractiveness or motor performance, or indirectly, ever, during the (early) reproductive season, we found
through the acquisition and defense of high quality food plasma levels of DHEA to be lower and levels of T highly
sources (McGlothlin et al. 2007; Byers et al. 2011). variable. We found a consistent pattern in C. anna where
When A. alexandri arrived at our field site in early April, levels of DHEA were significantly higher in territorial than
they were consistently territorial and actively displaced C. in non-territorial individuals and positively correlated with
anna from feeders. We found aggression levels in this aggression levels. In this species, body condition tended to
species tended to be positively correlated with T (Fig. 3b). be higher in males with higher DHEA (Fig. 4c), suggesting
However, we observed a marginally negative relation that more aggressive subjects were able to secure higher
between T and body condition (Fig. 3c). Possible expla- quality resources (Copenhaver and Ewald 1980; Camfield
nations could be related to the lower capacity of A. alex- 2006). Our results could suggest that androgen precursors
andri for fat storage in comparison to bigger hummingbird such as DHEA are linked to aggression levels during the
species such as C. anna (Hainsworth 1978). In addition, A. non-reproductive season in year-round territorial hum-
alexandri males face higher energy expenditures than C. mingbird species; however new studies and manipulative
anna during the reproductive season. They perform a long experiments are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
distance migration to breeding grounds where they defend In our field site, the aggression displayed by C. anna
feeding resources at the same time that they perform (measured with the aggression index) was five times lower
expensive courtship displays. In middle August, during than that previously reported for S. sephanoides during the
molt and before migration, A. alexandri showed T levels same time of the year (González-Gómez et al. 2011a).
significantly lower in comparison to the reproductive sea- These behaviors were displayed to maintain feeding terri-
son. This was expected at the end of the breeding season as tories during the non-reproductive season (Stiles 1971) and
it does in many other seasonal species (Wingfield et al. included chases, contacts, and vocalizations. Despite cli-
1990, 2001). In addition, elevated levels of T could inhibit matic conditions and habitat structure similarities in the
or delay molt (Schleussner et al. 1985). areas inhabited by C. anna in central California and S.
Conversely, we found high variation in T levels in S. sephanoides in central Chile, C. anna maintained territories
rufus, which could be at least partially explained by the that were roughly five times bigger than typical S. sep-
location of our field site. Specifically, our field site is in the hanoides territories (Stiles 1971; González-Gómez and
migration route of this species. Therefore, it is possible Vasquez 2006). This may offer an explanation at the eco-
some of the birds could have been summer residents while logical level for the observed differences in aggression
others were likely to be migrants heading north. Further levels during the non-reproductive season. Previous studies
research is needed to assess the link between survival, have shown that under similar resource conditions, the

123
J Ornithol

intensity of territory defense tends to be higher in smaller suggest that the regulation of aggressive behavior in
territories and where open vegetation structure easily allows hummingbirds and, therefore, the ability to secure scarce
territory owners to detect intruders (Norton et al. 1982). resources, could be mediated by different hormones during
the reproductive season and non-reproductive seasons in
Female aggression year-round territorial species such as S. sephanoides and C.
anna. Manipulations of DHEA and T are needed to confirm
Although we did not quantify aggression in females, we did the functional relationship between hormone levels,
observe intra-specific and inter-specific aggressive aggressive behaviors and body condition. Further research
encounters among female C. anna, A. alexandri, and S. is needed to describe these relationships through the annual
rufus. Even when females did not display territorial life cycle, especially in migratory species.
behaviors consistently, levels of T in CF of female S. rufus
were similar to those in males of this species. Previous Acknowledgments This paper is dedicated to the memory of Loreto
Godoy. We thank Baggins End Community, and Lee James of Tierra
studies demonstrate that levels of T in females of sexually Verde Vegetables for allowing us to work in their properties. We
polygynous species are significantly lower than levels of T thank Kara Sweeney and Holly Ernest for contacts and sampling help.
in conspecific males and lower than levels of T in females This research was supported by CONICYT, Postdoc Becas Chile to
of monogamous species (Ketterson et al. 2005). Because PGG and the Endowed Professorship in Physiology to JCW, College
of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis and Grant
hummingbirds are sexually polygynous, we expected T in Number IOS-0750540 from the National Science. Foundation to
males and females to show a similar pattern; the fact that JCW.
they did not could be an effect of small sample size and/or
large variation in T levels of males.
The fact that females show detectable levels of T during
the reproductive season may be related to the role of T in
References
ovulation and egg production. For example, during ovulation
the thecal layer of the developing follicle produces T, which Armstrong LE (2005) Hydration assessment techniques. Nutr Rev
is converted to an estrogen by adjacent granulosa cells 63:S40–S54
(Gomez et al. 2001). T also regulates the production of Brenowitz EA, Arnold AP (1993) Hormone accumulation in song
regions of the canary brain. J Neurobiol 23:871–880
albumin by the oviduct (Yu and Marquardt 1973; Müller
Byers J, Hebets E, Podos J (2011) Female mate choice based upon
et al. 2002). In addition, T that is not converted to estradiol in male motorperformance. An Behav 79:771–778
the ovary can circulate and affect behavior (Brenowitz and Camfield AF (2006) Resource value affects territorial defense by
Arnold 1993). Considering that female hummingbird species broad tailed and rufous hummingbirds. J Field Ornithol
77:120–125
solely display parental care, it would be very difficult for
Copenhaver C, Ewald PW (1980) Cost of territory establishment in
females to hold a feeding territory during the reproductive hummingbirds. Oecologia 46:155–160
season. However, aggressive behaviors against other hum- Elekonich MM, Wingfield JC (2000) Seasonality and hormonal
mingbird males or females could be advantageous in terms of control of territorial aggression in female song sparrows
(Passeriformes: Emberizidae: Melospiza melodia). Ethology
improving food access (González-Gómez et al. 2011a). That
106:493–510
could be especially significant in species such as A. alexandri Gomez Y, Velazquez PN, Peralta-Delgado I, Mendez MC, Vilchis F,
and S. rufus, in which males are highly territorial and Juarez-Oropeza M, Pedernera E (2001) Follicle stimulating
aggressive during this period, often forcing the females to hormone regulates steroidogenic enzymes in cultured cells of the
chick embryo ovary. Gen Comp Endoc 121:305–315
poor and scattered resources (Kodric-Brown and Brown
González-Gómez PL, Estades CF (2009) Is natural selection
1978). On the other hand, it has been argued that aggression promoting sexual dimorphism in the Green-backed firecrown
in females could be related to circulating levels of estradiol hummingbird (Sephanoides sephaniodes)? J Ornithol
(Pärn et al. 2008, but see Elekonich and Wingfield 2000). Our 150:351–356
González-Gómez PL, Vasquez R (2006) A field study of spatial
preliminary data show that at the end of the reproductive
memory in Sephanoides sephaniodes. Ethology 112:790–795
season, estradiol in females was 25 times higher than levels González-Gomez PL, Ricote-Martı́nez N, Razeto-Barry P, Bozinovic
of T, but further sampling would be necessary to address the F (2011) Thermoregulatory cost affects territorial behavior in
relationship between estradiol and aggressive behaviors in hummingbirds: a model and its application. Behav Ecol Socio-
biol 65:2141–2148
female hummingbirds.
González-Gómez PL, Bozinovic F, Vásquez RA (2011a) Elements of
episodic-like memory in free-living hummingbirds, energetic
consequences. An Behav 81:1257–1262
Conclusion González-Gómez PL, Vásquez RA, Bozinovic F (2011b) Flexibility
of foraging behavior in hummingbirds: the role of energy
constraints and cognitive abilities. Auk 128:36–42
High levels of steroids supporting territorial behaviors are Goyman W (2005) Noninvasive monitoring of hormones in bird
likely to be adaptive in territorial animals. Our results droppings physiological validation, sampling, extraction, sex

123
J Ornithol

differences, and the influence of diet on hormone metabolite Soma KK, Wingfield JC (2001) Dehydroepiandrosterone in song
levels. Ann NY Acad Sci 1046:35–53 plasma: seasonal regulation and relationship to territorial
Goymann W, Landys MM, Wingfield JC (2007) Distinguishing aggression. Gen Comp Endoc 123:144–155
seasonal androgen responses from male–male androgen respon- Soma KK, Traimontin AD, Wingfield JC (2000) Oestrogen regulates
siveness—revisiting the challenge hypothesis. Horm Behav male aggression in the non-breeding season. Proc Roy Soc Lon
51:463–476 B 267:1089–1096
Hainsworth FR (1978) Feeding: models of costs and benefits in Soma KK, Wissman AM, Brenowitz EA, Wingfield JC (2002)
energy regulation. Am Zool 18:701–714 Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) increases territorial song and
Hau M (2007) Regulation of male traits by testosterone: implications the size of an associated brain region in a male songbird. Horm
for the evolution of vertebrate life histories. Bioessays Behav 41:203–212
29:133–144 Stiles FG (1971) Time, energy, and territoriality of the anna
Hau M, Wikelski M, Soma KK, Wingfield JC (2000) Testosterone hummingbird (Calypte anna). Science 173:818–820
and year-round territoriality in a tropical bird. Gen Comp Endoc Suarez RK (1992) Hummingbird flight: sustaining the highest mass-
117:20–33 specific metabolic rates among vertebrates. Experientia
Hiebert SM, Ramenofsky M, Salvante K, Wingfield JC, Gass CL 48:565–570
(2000) Noninvasive methods for measuring and manipulating Suarez RK, Gass CL (2002) Hummingbird foraging and the relation
corticosterone in hummingbirds. Gen Comp Endoc 120:235–247 between bioenergetics and behaviour. Comp Biochem Physiol A
Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, Sandell M (2005) Testosterone in females: 133:335–343
mediator of adaptive traits, constraint on the evolution of sexual Temeles EJ, Goldman RS, Kudla AU (2005) Foraging and territory
dimorphism, or both? Am Nat 166:S85–S98 economics of sexually dimorphic purple-throated caribs (Eu-
Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1978) Influence of economics, inter- lampis jugularis) on three heliconia morphs. Auk 122:187–204
specific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of Wasser SK, Thomas R, Nair PP, Guidry C, Southers J, Lucas J, Wildt
migrant rufous hummingbirds. Ecology 59:285–296 DE, Monfort SL (1993) Effects of dietary fiber on faecal steroid
López-Calleja MV, Bozinovic F (2003) Dynamic energy and time measurements in baboons (Papio cynocephalus cynocephalus).
budgets in hummingbirds: a study in Sephanoides sephaniodes. J Rep Fertil 97:569–574
J Comp Biochem Physiol A 134:283–295 Wingfield JC (1984) Androgens and mating systems: testosterone-
McGlothlin JW, Jawor JM, Ketterson ED (2007) Natural variation in induced polygyny in normally monogamous birds. Auk
a testosterone-mediated trade-off between mating effort and 101:665–671
parental effort. Am Nat 170:864–875 Wingfield JC, Soma KK (2002) Spring and autumn in song sparrows:
Müller W, Eising C, Dijkstra C, Groothuis T, Sageder G (2002) Sex same behavior, different mechanisms? Integr Comp Biol
differences in yolk hormones depend on maternal social status in 42:11–20
leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Proc R Soc Lon B Wingfield JC, Henger RE, Dufty AM Jr, Ball GF (1990) The
269:2249–2255 ‘‘challenge hypothesis’’: theoretical implications for patterns of
Norton ME, Arcese P, Ewald PW (1982) Effect of intrusion pressure testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies.
on territory size in black-chinned hummingbirds (Archilochus- Am Nat 136:829–846
alexandri). Auk 99:761–764 Wingfield JC, Vleck CM, Moore MC (1992) Seasonal changes of the
Ogawa S, Lubahn D, Korach K, Pfaff D (1997) Behavioral effects of adrenocortical response to stress in birds of the sonoran desert.
oestrogen receptor gene distribution in male mice. Proc Natl J Exp Zool 264:419–428
Acad Sci USA 94:1476–1481 Wingfield JC, Lynn S, Soma KK (2001) Avoiding the ‘costs’ of
Pärn H, Lindström KM, Sandell M, Amundsen T (2008) Female testosterone: ecological bases of hormone–behavior interactions.
aggressive response and hormonal correlates—an intrusion Brain Beh Evol 57:239–251
experiment in a free-living passerine. Behav Ecol Sociobiol Yu JYL, Marquardt RR (1973) Synergism of testosterone and
62:1665–1677 estradiol in the development and function of the magnum from
Schleussner G, Dittami JP, Gwinner E (1985) Testosterone implants the immature chicken oviduct. Endocrinology 92:563–572
affect molt in male European Starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Physiol
Zool 58:597–604

123

You might also like