Student 2022113023 number MAJOR German and German Literature WEEK 5 At the end of 2019, a disease called COVID-19 occurred in China. The disease has spread around the world and has officially infected hundreds of millions of people to date. This situation has made a stark distinction between the world before and after the outbreak. Self-isolation has emerged, something we have never heard of before, and masks have become a necessity when we leave the house. Most countries in the world have suppressed individual freedom by various means to slow and curb the spread of the disease. I think a serious violation of people's human rights occurred in this process.
I think people have different opinions on the criteria for restricting
individual freedom. The line I think of here is whether an individual's words and actions violate the degree of freedom of others. And more importantly, is there "consistency" in judging whether it violates the degree of freedom of others?
Most advanced countries, including Korea, have imposed obligations on
people to wear masks. These controls, which were designed as a way to prevent the spread of the virus, are evaluated to have actually suppressed the spread of COVID-19. However, when implementing this obligation to wear a mask, the standards were different depending on the situation, such as indoor, outdoor, and restaurants. In Korea, the obligation to wear a mask indoors and outdoors was enforced, and at the same time, the obligation to wear a mask was not enforced in the process of eating food in internal spaces such as restaurants and cafes. I find this very ironic. In situations where people walk away from people outdoors, the obligation to wear is imposed, but the obligation in the internal space where the air flow is limited is lifted. Then, why is it mandatory to wear a mask outdoors? I think this is a serious violation of the right to freedom for individual citizens outdoors, and it can only be seen for the purpose of the state controlling the people.
In addition to the obligation to wear masks, a system called self-isolation
emerged after the COVID-19 situation. Due to this system, few people, such as COVID-19 patients and contacts, have never lived in quarantine in Korea. I believe that the infringement of individual freedom occurred even in the process of implementing the self-isolation system. I think it is reasonable to quarantine a person who has been confirmed to be infected with COVID-19 because there is a justification to protect the degree of freedom of others. However, consider the situation in which a soldier on vacation from the military returns to the unit and quarantines even though he has no symptoms. I think this is an indiscriminate abuse of quarantine.
The COVID-19 situation induced serious infringement on individual
freedom. I think this infringement is a great threat to human rights, which is a fundamental human right. No one knows what else will happen to us in the future, but if we have to limit individual freedom, we should minimize it as necessary. As a result, we can defend the values of individual freedom guaranteed by human rights, and when those values are observed, we truly believe that we humans can develop and progress further.
The Great Reset!: The Truth about Agenda 2021-2030, New Covid Variants, Vaccines & Medical Apartheid - Mind Control – World Domination – Sterilization Exposed!