Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- Ethics lexic : Culture , Good , Beliefs, Behaviours, Religion, Rules, Principles, Values, Morals,
Education
- What’s Ethics ? ; Ethics has to do with feelings / intuition
- Ethics is linked to law and rules ; Everything lega lis automatically ethical
- Euthensia : القتل الرحيمit’s legal but not ethical , Not everything that’s lega lit ethical
- Ethics is associated to religion ; what’s religious it’s automatically ethical
- Ethics is what soceity accepts ; Usages : not everythings accepted by soceity are ethical ; Ex :
Corruption , Descrimination
- For me ethics is : Instinct, Religion, Social Norms and Usages
We live our life in so much chaos and everyday we have new questions to ask ? sometimes we find
the right answers and sometimes wu just give up on looking for them , one of these many questions
is : Are we living in an ethichal way or not ?
Everyone of us has a different answer , but before this we should define the concept of ethics
Ethics is a very complicated and deep concept that gathers a lot of parts of life , even if some of the is
contradictory to the other , because we can find somthing that is religeous but not legal or socially
normal but not right from the perspective of our feelings .
So , Ethics is somehow subjective and each one of us can define it on his own , Because somthing bad
for me can be good for others and inversely , and something religious for muslims is obsolutely not
religeous for Hindu , and something legal in tunisia is not in legal in Morocco , ans something normal
in the rural soceity is out of normal in another place …
we don’t have a unique law or unique religion neither unique soceity norms , what can we say then ?
we will never have unique ethics if we don’t agree on a unique source of them and more than that if
these sources do not agree with each other .
Politics is an essential human activity – essential in building societies and communities based on
rules, laws and a balance of conflicting interests. Politics is complex and difficult. It requires a high
level of responsibility and commitment from citizens, political parties, parliamentarians, government
executives, the judiciary, the media, business, nongovernmental organisations, and religious and
educational institutions. But polls on all continents on the confidence of people in institutions show
that people do not place much trust in politics and politicians. They are often seen as selfish and
corrupt power-players, defending special interests instead of the common good and the different
parts of the population. “Ethics in politics” seems to many a contradiction in terms, even though
many politicians try to give their best for the common cause of a country or the international
community.
We can talk, about finance and ethics , because we have a participatory finance or islamic finance
when there is no usury no high interest rates
- Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do , and what’s a right to
do .
- Ethics is not about the way things are , It’s about the way they sould be
- In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of another , In ethics he is ethics if he only
thinks of doing so .
"Actions are (judged) by motives (niyyah), so each man will have what he intended
Session 3 : 27/11/2020 13:30
MOTIVATION :
What Is Motivation?
- Motivation is the process that initiates, guides, and maintains goal-oriented behaviors. It is
what causes you to act, whether it is getting a glass of water to reduce thirst or reading a
book to gain knowledge.
- Motivation involves the biological, emotional, social, and cognitive forces that activate
behavior. In everyday usage, the term "motivation" is frequently used to describe why a
person does something. It is the driving force behind human actions.
- Motivation is the word derived from the word ’motive’ which means needs, desires, wants or
drives within the individuals. It is the process of stimulating people to actions to accomplish
the goals. In the work goal context the psychological factors stimulating the people’s
behaviour can be
The common thig between all these definitions is the urge, willingness, desire, and the power to
achieve the goal
“Instead of denying these fears, declare them, say them out loud, admit them, give them the credit
they deserve…Find the courage to overcome them.” – Matthew McConaughey
We all know that the first obstacle that we face every day is our fears , some of us fear doing new
things , some of us fear learning new stuffs , others fear themselves , but if everyone can just declare
publicly his fears and admit them , he can easily deal with them , or he can even find some help to
overcome them , the point is that he will never have to struggle with his fears lonely he will feel
himself surrounded by his friends or team or any kind of human groups and he will feel himself
motivated and strong to face those obstacles and let them behind him . and he just goes ahead and
can find the best version of himself .
“"Whoever seeks the top must sit up the nights. The hardest you work, the highest you will reach”
Imam Ash-Shâfi'î
To explain this quote i will explain the link between hard work and success , it’s a relation of
causality , you can’t succeed if you didn’t work hard , when I say hard work I don’t mean
just working like a machine or a robot but I mean that we have to be smart in our work we
have to be patient , we have to know that life isn’t easy as much as it seems and mostly we
have to keep up doing the hard work and looking always for the best possible result and
here I will give you some historical and actual examples of successful people who worked
very hard in order to achieve their goals , Muhammed The messenger of Allah peace be
upon him that had a very difficult and complicated mission , to transmit the message of
Allah to us , the prophet had been working for so many years if we didn’t say for his whole
life , he had been punished , attacked , insulted and resisted but he stayed motivated to
accomplish his mission , and YES ! peace be upon him won the challenge and built the
greatest and most powerful nation in History . nowadays we have a lot of successful people
, Cristiano Ronaldo , Jeff Bezos , Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Mask , the common thing
between them that they’re really successful , some of them made a huge worth , others
discovered some amazing scientific explorations and innovations , and some of them
reached the best version of themselves the thing that I consider personally a huge success ,
but the other common thing is that they worked very hard days and nights and the results
we’re seeing now are perfect and surprising as much as the work was .
AIDA Model :
- A : Attract
- I : Interest
- D : desire
- A : Act
THEORIES OF MOTIVATION :
The problem of this theory that it depends on the pyramid order , which can not be
empirically tested , and the second problem is safety in work ( comparation between public
and private sector ) , the 3th problem ( Objectif )
- McClelland theory
1- Needs for power (Give responsibility)
2- Needs for Affiliation ( social needs )
3- Needs for Achievement (Give challenging
work)
- Douglass Mcregor
1- Theory X : people dislike work (Punishment, Authority)
2- Theory Y : work = Pleasure
3- Theory Z :
Types of power :
The best power of them is that it depends on the population we’re dealing with
One of the most widely accepted explanations of motivation is offered by Victor Vroom in his
Expectancy Theory” It is a cognitive process theory of motivation. The theory is founded on
the basic notions that people will be motivated to exert a high level of effort when they
believe there are relationships between the effort they put forth, the performance they
achieve, and the outcomes/ rewards they receive.
Thus, the key constructs in the expectancy theory of motivation are:
1. Valence:
Valence, according to Vroom, means the value or strength one places on a particular
outcome or reward.
2. Expectancy:
3. Instrumentality:
Thus, Vroom’s motivation can also be expressed in the form of an equation as follows:
Motivation = Valence x Expectancy x Instrumentality
Being the model multiplicative in nature, all the three variables must have high positive
values to imply motivated performance choice. If any one of the variables approaches to
zero level, the possibility of the so motivated performance also touches zero level
Victor Vroom stated that people will be highly productive and motivated if two
conditions are met:
1) people believe it is likely that their efforts will lead to successful results and
2) those people also believe they will be rewarded for their success.
People will be motivated to exert a high level of effort when they believe there are
relationships between the efforts they put forth, the performance they achieve, and
the outcomes/ rewards they receive.
Hertzberg’s two factor theory :
Hertzberg classified the needs into two broad categories namely hygiene factors and
motivating factors.
Hygiene factors are needed to make sure that an employee is not dissatisfied. Motivation
factors are needed for ensuring employee's satisfaction and employee’s motivation for
higher performance. Mere presence of hygiene factors does not guarantee motivation, and
presence of motivation factors in the absence of hygiene factors also does not work.
Output : salary
Balance between what they give to the organization and what they get in return
Fairness = balance
We have to compare our outcomes and outputs, and my output with the outputs of others
Limits of this theory : Perception of theory , this theory doesn’t take into consideration that
perceptions
Utilizing the ideas in the Expectancy Theory directly has proved to be difficult (Miner, 2005).
The ideas are not easy to understand, or to apply (Mullins, 2005). Thus, the theory has much
less value in practice than some of the other theories
The Expectancy Theory is not concerned with individual and country or cultural differences.
However, people in developed countries tend to be more goal oriented than people in less
developed cultures
The Expectancy Theory assumes that individuals make conscious decisions at the start of
their effort. But it has been proved that individuals make decisions after performing their
activities and try to rationalize their decisions later on
Perception of reward
1- “Start when you are, use what you have, do what you can”
2- “wake up with determination, go to bed with satisfaction”
3- “The motivation comes from within, no one can hand it to you, but no one can take it
away either”
4- “Confidence: will they like me? Confidence: is I don’t care if they don’t “
PERCEPTION
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can”
To explain this quote I will treat each of its sentences separately, Start when you are, means
that we don’t have to look for a better place or status to start working, we have to start
wherever and whenever we are even if we are living unfavorable conditions, we have to start
and just let life goes on , because if we stayed waiting for the right place and moment we
will wait forever , use what you have , people always make excuses because of resources,
it’s right and obvious that we need inputs to create outputs, but how will this inputs or
resources come to us ? by work of course , so start working to have resources and
resources will help you to work it’s a cycle, do what you can , we start working and we have
the necessary resources, but are we doing the necessary effort to exploit the previous things
, this is the question we have to ask ourselves, because if we don’t do the right effort we
won’t get the expected results.
So Yes, the place where we are or the resources that we have or even the effort that we
can’t do aren’t legitime excuses!
Life is hard, this why we need to wake up every day with energy and determination to face it,
and we have to go back to bed full of satisfaction and complacency, but how to turn this
determination into satisfaction? It’s hard to answer this question, because determination
and satisfaction aren’t measurable, each one has his own definition and feeling for these
two concepts, but the main message behind this quote is that I have to know firstly what’s
determination for me and what’s satisfaction, and work and do all the possible effort to turn
the determination into satisfaction according to my own norms.
“The motivation comes from within, no one can hand it to you, but no one can take it
away either”
We all know that motivation isn’t palpable, and its sources aren’t common , then , each one
defines motivation according to his own mindset , because motivation is one of the most
inner concepts of our psychological life , and as the quote said motivation comes from
within that means motivation comes from the interior and even if we find it in external
sources it comes always from within it’s that energy we feel every day that pushes us to go
farther than our expectations, it’s something we own , specific to us , it comes from the
deepest point of our soul , and no one hand it to us no one make it ready for use and we
just find it or buy it like some other things is not a good it’s not an experience. And if it
comes it will stick to our minds & souls not forever but for enough time to make us achieve
our goals and no one literally no one can take it away except ourselves, So, the message
behind this quote is that motivation is a decision to make it’s personal and Controllable. So
if you won’t to be motivated decide it and no one can stop you!
“Confidence: will they like me? Confidence: is I don’t care if they don’t”
Before I proceed to analyze this quote , let me give a simple definition of confidence ,
confidence according to oxford dictionary , the feeling that you can trust, believe in, and be
sure about the abilities or good qualities of someone or something. Based on this definition
the quote clarifies to us that confidence is the fact of trusting believe in and be sure about
my own qualities and abilities , and whatever is the reaction or the opinion of my
environment I have to be self-confident and self-satisfied since I believe that I’m on the right
way and I’m doing the right thing , the unique opinion that I have to give importance is my
opinion about me . do I like myself ? do I love myself ? am I right ? and that’s it .
Perception:
Definition of perception:
A belief or opinion, often held by many people and based on how things seem
Types of perception:
- Vision
- Touch
- Sound
- Taste
- Smell
There are also other senses that allow us to perceive things such as balance, time, body
position, acceleration, and the perception of internal states. Many of these are multimodal
and involve more than one sensory modality. Social perception, or the ability to identify and
use social cues about people and relationships, is another important type of perception.
1- The environmental stimulus: The world is full of stimuli that can attract attention
through various senses. The environmental stimulus is everything in the environment
that has the potential to be perceived.
2- The attended stimulus: The attended stimulus is the specific object in the
environment on which attention is focused.
3- The image on the retina: This involves light actually passing through the cornea and
pupil and onto the lens of the eye. The cornea helps focus the light as it enters the
eye, and the iris of the eye controls the size of the pupils in order to determine how
much light to let in. The cornea and lens act together to project an inverted image
onto the retina.
4- Transduction: The image on the retina is then transformed into electrical signals in a
process known as transduction. This allows the visual messages to be transmitted to
the brain to be interpreted.
5- Neural processing: The electrical signals then undergo neural processing. The path
followed by a particular signal depends on what type of signal it is (i.e. an auditory
signal or a visual signal).
6- Perception: In this step of the process, you perceive the stimulus object in the
environment. It is at this point that you become consciously aware of the stimulus.
8- Action: The action phase of perception involves some type of motor activity that
occurs in response to the perceived and recognized stimulus. This might involve a
major action, like running toward a person in distress, or something as subtle as
blinking your eyes in response to a puff of dust blowing through the air.
Halo effect: The halo effect is a type of cognitive bias in which our overall impression of a
person influences how we feel and think about their character
Projection:
Perception as a concept is mainly linked to our perceptual systems , our 5 senses , and
according to the perceptual process that we’ve discussed , there is a phase of selection
which consists on paying attention and select the most important information or stimulus for
us , so if we are looking for something , thinking about it or having the intention to do it , our
5 senses will be focused in an involuntary way on this thing , for example if I’m looking for
Violent quarrel , all our perceived information will be characterized by violence and hatred,
So yeah ! what we see depends mainly on what we look for !
“You see persons and things not as they are but as you are”
Our surroundings are a mirror that reflects our essence, if we are good to people , people
will be good to us , and if we did bad to people , they will do the same to us. Simply, How
people and things behave depends strongly on how much my behavior is good or bad
toward them , So if you want to perceive positivity and goodness, be positive and good you
first .
“Change your perception of things and you will change your reality”
Perception as a belief or conviction can be right or wrong , can be real or illusionist, can
reflect our real world or not, but the good thing is that if we worked hard on ourselves , if we
brushed our personalities , if we improved our attitude and reactivity we can certainly
control ameliorate and upgrade our perception , and if this is done , we will be able to
perceive who are the real us and what is our reality , and then we can change it , we can
move on.
Reality is outside , but perception is the inside’s reality, what we see and what we hear every
day can be the same thing in reality but in each one’s mind it will be certainly different ,
because the way how we perceive life and our environment impact strongly if we don’t say
totally, the reality of information , then , reality and the perception of reality will be different.
There is no truth, there is only perception, Why? Because perception is the ultimate truth
because what’s real in mind is real in its consequences
TOEIC TEST:
Strategy Practice:
1- C
2- B
3- A
4- A
5- D
6- C
7- B ( Conditional 1 : If + future + present )
8- B
9- A
10- B
11- B
12- C
13- D (Since + present perfect)
14- A
15- In (place)
16- C
17- A ( conditional 3 )
Page 172 :
1- A
2- A
3- C
4- D
5- C
6- A
7- A
Fired = discharged = to sack, licencier à cause des problèmes financiers = to down size , to
lay off
8- A
9- B
selected = short-listed
Conditional :
1- B
2- A
3- B
4- C
5- D
6- B
7- D
8- C
9- A
10- B
Reading Review :
1- D
2- C
3- B
4- A
5- C
6- B
7- B
8- C
9- A
10- C
11- A
12- C
13- B
14- D
15- D
16- A
17- D
18- C
19- A
20- D
21- B
22- C
23- B
24- A
25- C
26- C
27- A
28- D
29- C
30- C
31- D
32- A
33- B
34- A
35- C
36- D
Aaaa
1- C
2- A
3- B
4- A
5- B
6- C
7- A
8- B
9- D
10- C
11- A
12- D
13- B
14- A
15- D
16- A
Conflict Management:
What’s Conflict?
Conflict management is all techniques and ideas that help to reduce the negative effects of conflict
and enhance the positive outcomes for all parties involved.
Avoiding an issue is one way a manager might attempt to resolve conflict. This type of conflict style
does not help the other staff members reach their goals and does not help the manager who is
avoiding the issue and cannot assertively pursue his or her own goals. However, this works well when
the issue is trivial or when the manager has no chance of winning.
Collaborating managers become partners or pair up with each other to achieve both of their goals in
this style. This is how managers break free of the win-lose paradigm and seek the win-win. This can
be effective for complex scenarios where managers need to find a novel solution.
Competing: This is the win-lose approach. A manager is acting in a very assertive way to achieve his
or her own goals without seeking to cooperate with other employees, and it may be at the expense of
those other employees. This approach may be appropriate for emergencies when time is of the
essence.
Compromising: This is the lose-lose scenario where neither person nor manager really achieves what
they want. This requires a moderate level of assertiveness and cooperation. It may be appropriate for
scenarios where you need a temporary solution or where both sides have equally important goals.
Avoiding style
Sometimes, people prefer to avoid confronting the conflict altogether. This may include delaying a
deadline or decision, physically separating the opposing parties or removing themselves from the
situation. Many times, this only pushes the conflict to a later date. If a conflict is left unresolved for
too long, it can cause resentment and frustration among the employees. However, it can also give the
disagreeing parties time to readjust their attitude or methods, and the problem might resolve itself
with little further action.
Example: Josh and Allison disagree on the best plan for implementing a new advertising campaign.
They have tried to find a compromise, but their disagreement is becoming angrier and more
distracting each minute. Their supervisor tells them to set the campaign aside and work on other
projects for the rest of the day. Taking a break from the project gives both Josh and Allison time to
work through the conflict on their own. They continued working on the campaign the next morning
with more positive and collaborative attitudes.
Competing style addresses conflict directly and bluntly. Competing style is assertive and
uncooperative. The goal of competing style is typically to end the conflict as quickly as possible. While
competing style may get fast results, it can also be detrimental to the morale and productivity of a
team. If you always compete with others rather than compromise, you may stifle helpful input from
your coworkers and damage your workplace relationships.
Example: Cody has worked at the Edgefield Electric company for sixteen years. He’s good at his job
and rarely needs input from his supervisors. Casey is a recent hire and has needed extensive training.
While Cody is showing a process to Casey, Casey suggests an alternate method. Instead of considering
Casey’s idea or taking the time to explain the logic behind the current method, Cody ends the
conversation abruptly and tells Casey to just follow his instructions. Cody has done nothing
technically wrong, but Casey now feels belittled and ignored.
Accommodating style is the opposite of competing style. Accommodating style resolves conflict by
giving in to the opposing party. You might need to use an accommodating conflict style or attitude
when interacting with someone with a strong or abrasive personality. Acknowledging and accepting
someone else’s views or perspectives is an important part of teamwork, especially when the other
party is an expert or more experienced than you. However, it is also crucial for you to know when
accommodating someone else might be detrimental to you or your team’s best interest.
Example: Jill loves working at her local fitness center. She enjoys her job and gets along with all her
coworkers except for one. Maddie has a strong personality and does not like to be told “no.” Maddie
tries to take advantage of Jill’s accommodating personality by pressuring her into trading shifts. Jill
does not appreciate Maddie’s actions, but she also does not want to introduce additional tension into
her workplace. She agrees to trade with Maddie to keep the peace.
The compromising conflict style is often referred to as the “lose-lose” method. When you address
conflict with this style, you encourage each side to make some significant sacrifices. By definition, this
means that neither side gets exactly what they want. Ideally, after compromising on one or more
minimal issues, both of the conflicting parties could then agree on the larger issue. This can foster
short-term productivity, but it rarely completely solves the underlying problems.
Example: The profits from Everett and Brian’s pet shop business have grown significantly in the last six
months. They disagree on how to make the best use of their newly increased savings. Everett wants
to expand the pet shop’s inventory by 20 percent, while Brian wants to increase the budget for local
advertising by 15 percent. After arguing for several days, Brian suggests that they increase both
budgets by just 10 percent. Neither party is particularly satisfied with this option, but they
compromise to quickly move past the conflict.
Collaborating style
1- “10% of conflict is due to difference in opinions, and 90% is due to wrong tone of
voice”
2- “Conflict can not continue without your participation”
3- “Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the ability to cope with it”
What are the causes that contribute in choosing a conflict management style?
model called "satisficing." Instead of rigorously seeking the best possible decision, you're
just looking for a "good enough" decision.
You can use bounded rationality when you don't have enough time or information to follow
the full rational decision-making model
There's no one ideal process for making decisions. Instead, the best process to use will
change based on your situation.
Programmes / Unprogrammed
Strategic/Tactical/Operationnal
Organizationnal/Personal
Group/individual
Organizationnal change
Create a vision.
Overcommunicate
Listen.
Lack of Resources
ETHICS
MOTIVATION
PERCEPTION
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
DECESION MAKING
“Perception is experiences”
No introduction
No definition of concepts
Relevant example
Last year : “What are the differences between malsows ald aldrefer ?
CHAPTER 1: ETHICS
CHAPTER 2: MOTIVATION
CHAPTER 3: PERCEPTION
CHAPTER 1 : ETHICS
- What’s Ethics?
- Quotes:
▪ “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do,
and what’s a right to do”.
▪ “Ethics is not about the way things are, It’s about the way they should
be”.
▪ “In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of another, In ethics
he Is ethics if he only thinks of doing so.”
CHAPTER 2 : MOTIVATION
- What Is Motivation?
- AIDA Model:
▪ A: Attract
▪ I: Interest
▪ D: desire
▪ A: Act
- Theories of motivation:
▪ McClelland theory
1. Needs for power (Give responsibility)
2. Needs for Affiliation ( social needs )
3. Needs for Achievement (Give challenging work)
⮚ Types of power:
1. Coercive power (fear and punishment)
2. Reward power (rewards)
3. Expert power (experience, competency)
4. Referent power (Respect, Personality)
There is no best power between them, but it depends on the population we are
dealing with.
This theory chows the balance between what employees give to the organization
and what they get in return. Employees compare their outcomes and outputs, and
their output with the outputs of others. Balance between effort and fruits:
- equity=motivation
- inequity=demotivation.
Perception of theory, this theory doesn’t take into consideration that perceptions are
different between employees.
- Quotes:
▪ “Start when you are, use what you have, do what you can”
▪ “wake up with determination, go to bed with satisfaction”
▪ “The motivation comes from within, no one can hand it to you, but no
one can take it away either”
▪ “Confidence: will they like me? Confidence: is I don’t care if they
don’t
CHAPTER 3: PERCEPTION
- What’s perception:
A belief or opinion, often held by many people and based on how things seem
- Types of perception:
▪ Vision
▪ Touch
▪ Sound
▪ Taste
▪ Smell
- Perceptual process:
⮚ Halo effect: The halo effect is a type of cognitive bias in which our overall
impression of a person influences how we feel and think about his character.
⮚ Stereotyping: A preconceived and oversimplified idea of the characteristics which
typify a person, race, or community which may lead to treating them in a particular
way.
⮚ Projection: Projection refers to unconsciously taking unwanted emotions or traits
you don’t like about yourself and attributing them to someone else.
- Quotes:
- What’s Conflict?
People prefer to avoid confronting the conflict altogether. This may include delaying
a deadline or decision, physically separating the opposing parties or removing
themselves from the situation. Many times, this only pushes the conflict to a later
date. If a conflict is left unresolved for too long, it can cause resentment and
frustration among the employees. However, it can also give the disagreeing parties
time to readjust their attitude or methods, and the problem might resolve itself with
little further action.
Example: Josh and Allison disagree on the best plan for implementing a new
advertising campaign. They have tried to find a compromise, but their disagreement
is becoming angrier and more distracting each minute. Their supervisor tells them to
set the campaign aside and work on other projects for the rest of the day. Taking a
break from the project gives both Josh and Allison time to work through the conflict
on their own. They continued working on the campaign the next morning with more
positive and collaborative attitudes.
Competing style addresses conflict directly and bluntly. Competing style is assertive
and uncooperative. The goal of competing style is typically to end the conflict as
quickly as possible. While competing style may get fast results, it can also be
detrimental to the morale and productivity of a team. If you always compete with
others rather than compromise, you may stifle helpful input from your coworkers and
damage your workplace relationships.
Example: Cody has worked at the Edgefield Electric company for sixteen years. He’s
good at his job and rarely needs input from his supervisors. Casey is a recent hire
and has needed extensive training. While Cody is showing a process to Casey,
Casey suggests an alternate method. Instead of considering Casey’s idea or taking
the time to explain the logic behind the current method, Cody ends the conversation
abruptly and tells Casey to just follow his instructions. Cody has done nothing
technically wrong, but Casey now feels belittled and ignored.
▪ (3) Accommodating style: LOSE WIN
Example: Jill loves working at her local fitness center. She enjoys her job and gets
along with all her coworkers except for one. Maddie has a strong personality and
does not like to be told “no.” Maddie tries to take advantage of Jill’s accommodating
personality by pressuring her into trading shifts. Jill does not appreciate Maddie’s
actions, but she also does not want to introduce additional tension into her
workplace. She agrees to trade with Maddie to keep the peace.
The compromising conflict style is often referred to as the “lose-lose” method. When
you address conflict with this style, you encourage each side to make some
significant sacrifices. By definition, this means that neither side gets exactly what
they want. Ideally, after compromising on one or more minimal issues, both of the
conflicting parties could then agree on the larger issue. This can foster short-term
productivity, but it rarely completely solves the underlying problems.
Example: The profits from Everett and Brian’s pet shop business have grown
significantly in the last six months. They disagree on how to make the best use of
their newly increased savings. Everett wants to expand the pet shop’s inventory by
20 percent, while Brian wants to increase the budget for local advertising by 15
percent. After arguing for several days, Brian suggests that they increase both
budgets by just 10 percent. Neither party is particularly satisfied with this option, but
they compromise to quickly move past the conflict.
Example: Maggie owns a ballet studio that is managed by her best friend Pat.
Maggie and Pat usually agree on almost all business-related decisions. However, Pat
disagrees with Maggie regarding which job applicant they should hire as the new
dance teacher. As the owner, Maggie has the authority to overrule Pat’s opinion.
However, she chooses to sit down with Pat and discuss a solution that will please
them both. After several weeks of negotiation and open communication, they hire
two of the applicants for a trial period.
- Quotes:
▪ “10% of conflict is due to difference in opinions, and 90% is due to wrong
tone of voice”
▪ “Conflict can not continue without your participation”
▪ “Peace is not the absence of conflict, but the ability to cope with it”
▪ Programmed / Unprogrammed
1. Programmed decision: are based on criteria that are well understood.
2. Unprogrammed decision: are novel and lack clear guidelines for reaching a
solution.
1. Strategic decision: are decisions and plans that have long-term or material
impact on a company.
2. Tactical decision: are decisions and plans that concern the more detailed
implementation of the directors’ general strategy, usually with a medium-term
impact on a company.
3. Operational decision: are the day-to-day decisions that have only a
short-term impact on a company. These include, but are not limited to,
decisions regarding:
▪ Organizational / Personal
▪ Group / Individual
⮚ Groupthink: is a phenomenon that occurs when the desire for group consensus
overrides people's common sense desire to present alternatives, critique a
position, or express an unpopular opinion. Here, the desire for group cohesion
effectively drives out good decision-making and problem solving.