Professional Documents
Culture Documents
id=883&course=1
An e-learning tool for the private sector on the UN Convention against Corruption and the UN
Global Compact's 10th principle against corruption
My name is Neil Gillespie, age 57, a law-abiding, indigent, disabled citizen of the United States. On October 25,
2013 I made an urgent appeal to the United Nations For Protection from Political Persecution in the United States,
and requested an observer in a new petition filed October 23rd in the U.S. Supreme Court, No. 13-7280. Initially I
believed the International Covenant of Political and Civil Rights (ICCPR) would protect me, but since the United
States did not sign the first optional protocol, that may render the ICCPR of little use to me or any other American.
Instead, I invoked Article 6 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in a petition for
rehearing Petition No. 13-7280 that was denied January 13, 2014.
I am being persecuted by The Florida Bar, U.S. Judge William Terrell Hodges, and Florida attorneys Ryan
Christopher Rodems and Eugene P. Castagliuolo, in retaliation for petitioning the Government for a redress of
grievances in Petition No. 12-7747 for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, a First Amendment right.
Petition No. 12-7747 was compromised by fraud of the Respondents and the Attorney General of Florida. Specific
examples of current and ongoing political persecution of me include:
1. The Florida Bar for an open investigation of me for Unlicensed Practice of Law (UPL).
2. Mr. Rodems made the UPL complaint against me for representing myself and my interests.
3. Judge Hodges corruptly assisted McCalla Raymer in a wrongfully foreclosure of my home.
4. Mr. Castagliuolo’ ongoing threats to interfere with my Social Security disability income.
Petition No. 12-7747 was denied February 19, 2013. Rehearing was denied April 15, 2013.
In May 2013 I obtained public records showing Respondent David A. Rowland, General Counsel for Respondent
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Florida, concocted with others a fraud to falsely portray to Kenneth Wilson, Florida
Assistant Attorney General, that I did not serve Mr. Rowland my petition as I certified under Supreme Court Rule
29. Mr. Wilson claims he relied on Rowland’s fraud, and did not submit a brief in opposition due the Supreme Court
January 14, 2013. Evidence now shows Attorney General Bondi, et al, were co-conspirators.
Without a response, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi denied me due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments. The U.S. Supreme Court relies on opposition briefs as part of its adversarial process to properly
litigate and decide a petition. Florida’s opposition brief was due January 14, 2013. AG Bondi did not respond for
Florida, thus no opposition brief was distributed for the Supreme Court’s Conference February 15, 2013.
Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, Fraud or Impairment of Petition No. 12-7747, October 21, 2013 - To the Special
Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights, and the Special Rapporteur on Disability, United Nations Enable. Affidavit: Fraud or impairment of Petition
No. 12-7747, a legitimate government activity (18 U.S.C. § 371), deprivation of my rights under color of law (18
U.S.C. § 242), and conspiracy against my rights (18 U.S.C. § 241).
Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, I have a well-founded fear of political persecution, October 22, 2013 - To the Special
Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights, and the Special Rapporteur on Disability, United Nations Enable.
I have kept in email contact with Gabriela Knaul, Special Rapporteur, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, and
Shuaib Chalklen, Special Rapporteur on Disability, U.N. Enable, and Associates of the United Nations.
Petition for rehearing was filed February 7, 2014 see the link below. Thank you. Neil J. Gillespie
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13-7280.htm
New Website of the UNODC Corruption and Economic Crime Branch
Full launch in early 2024
Preview now
The United Nations Convention against Corruption is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption
RATIFICATION STATUS
instrument. The Convention's far-reaching approach and the mandatory character of many of its provisions
make it a unique tool for developing a comprehensive response to a global problem.
The Conference of the States Parties (COSP) is the main policy-making body of the Convention, supporting
States parties and signatories in their implementation of the Convention and giving policy guidance to
UNODC to develop and implement anti-corruption activities. The actual implementation of the Convention
into domestic law by States parties is evaluated through a unique peer-review process, the Implementation Parties: 190
Review Mechanism. Signatories: 140
To support States parties' efforts to fully implement the Convention, UNODC delivers technical assistance in
various corruption-related thematic areas, such as prevention, education, asset recovery, integrity in the criminal justice system, etc.
FEATURED RESOURCES
The TRACK platform (Tools and The Omnibus software provides The Country Profiles Database The StAR Initiative is a
Resources for Anti-Corruption for an innovative way to gather provides access to the outcome UNODC/World Bank partnership
Knowledge) provides online information on how States documents of the aimed to prevent the laundering
access to the UNCAC Legal implement the Convention Implementation Review of the proceeds of corruption
Library, as well as additional against Corruption through the Mechanism and other country- and facilitate more systematic
anti-corruption resources. computer-based self- based information on the and timely return of stolen
assessment checklist. implementation of the assets.
Read more»
Convention against Corruption. Read more»
Read more»
Read more»
United Nations Convention against Corruption
The United Nations Convention against Corruption is the only legally binding universal anti-corruption
instrument. The Convention's far-reaching approach and the mandatory character of many of its provisions
make it a unique tool for developing a comprehensive response to a global problem. The Convention covers
five main areas: preventive measures, criminalization and law enforcement, international cooperation, asset
recovery, and technical assistance and information exchange. The Convention covers many different forms
of corruption, such as bribery, trading in influence, abuse of functions, and various acts of corruption in the
private sector. A highlight of the Convention is the inclusion of a specific chapter on asset recovery, aimed
at returning assets to their rightful owners, including countries from which they had been taken illicitly. The
vast majority of United Nations Member States are parties to the Convention. Read more»
Signature and Ratification Status
Parties: 190
Status as of: 10 October 2023
Entry into force: 14 December 2005, in accordance with article 68 (1) which reads as follows: "1.This Convention shall enter into force on the
ninetieth day after the date of deposit of the thirtieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. For the purpose of this
paragraph, any instrument deposited by a regional economic integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by
member States of such organization. 2. For each State or regional economic integration organization ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding
to this Convention after the deposit of the thirtieth instrument of such action, this Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the
date of deposit by such State or organization of the relevant instrument or on the date this Convention enters into force pursuant to paragraph 1
of this article, whichever is later."
Cameroon 10 Dec 2003 6 Feb 2006
Canada 21 May 2004 2 Oct 2007
Central African Republic 11 Feb 2004 6 Oct 2006
Chad 26 June 2018 a
European Union 15 Sep 2005 12 Nov 2008 AA
Fiji 14 May 2008 a
Finland 9 Dec 2003 20 Jun 2006 A
France 9 Dec 2003 11 Jul 2005
Japan 9 Dec 2003 11 Jul 2017 A
Jordan 9 Dec 2003 24 Feb 2005
Kazakhstan 18 Jun 2008 a
Kenya 9 Dec 2003 9 Dec 2003
Morocco 9 Dec 2003 9 May 2007
Mozambique 25 May 2004 9 Apr 2008
Myanmar 2 Dec 2005 20 Dec 2012
Namibia 9 Dec 2003 3 Aug 2004
Russian Federation 9 Dec 2003 9 May 2006
Rwanda 30 Nov 2004 4 Oct 2006
Saint Lucia 18 Nov 2011 a
Samoa 16 Apr 2018 a
Timor-Leste 10 Dec 2003 27 Mar 2009
Togo 10 Dec 2003 6 Jul 2005
Tonga 6 Feb 2020 a
Trinidad and Tobago 11 Dec 2003 31 May 2006
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 5 9 Dec 2003 9 Feb 2006