Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30015414?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Social Service Review
This article presents a model of practice that attempts to integrate two historic social
work positions: emphasis on knowledge and skill to effect change in persons, and
emphasis on knowledge and skill to effect change in environments. An
ecological/reciprocal perspective not only integrates these positions but th
methodological specializations of casework, group work, and community organiza-
tion as well. Through an ecological theoretical perspective and a reciprocal concep-
tion of social work function, people and their environments receive simultaneous
professional attention. Needs and issues are reconceptualized from "personalit
states" and "environmental states" to problems in living. Professional interventio
associated with problems people experience are specified.
As the family or group works on the tasks associated with life transi-
tions or with using and influencing the environment, it sometimes
encounters impediments posed by maladaptive communication pro-
cesses and relationship patterns. Such impediments may be poorly
understood or altogether outside the members' awareness. Behavior-
ally they are expressed through patterned scapegoating, power
struggles, interlocking hostilities, mutual withdrawal, double binds,
and other distortions. While these patterned behaviors often serve a
latent function in maintaining the family or group equilibrium, the
When the focus is on helping families and groups to deal with such
transactions as patterned scapegoating8i or double-bind modes of
communication,'9 the worker invites and encourages the members to
view the obstacle through a systemic perspective. The worker encour-
ages mutuality among members by helping them search for common
concerns and self-interests. At the same time, the worker reaches for
and encourages the elaboration of differential perspectives. Strategi-
cally, it is often easier for members with the greater power and per-
sonal strength to begin the exploratory process. As work on the obsta-
cle proceeds, the less powerful and more insecure members often
require special support and encouragement to risk their perceptions
and interpretations. Expression of members' divergent, discrepant
perceptions needs to be partialized and the associated affect encour-
aged. If members attempt to avoid the content, the worker focuses,
mediates, and guards the conditions of their agreed-upon contract.
Throughout, the worker provides relevant facts, interpretations, and
perceptions and lends professional strength, support, and faith in
members' capacity to move beyond the painful obstacle.
In a similar way, interpersonal barriers can arise between worker
and client(s) manifested in distorted communications and maladap-
tive relationship processes. Frequently such barriers are defined as
Summary
Notes
1. See, e.g., Carol H. Meyer, Social Work Practice: A Response to the Urban Crisis (New
York: Free Press, 1970); Allan Pincus and Anne Minahan, Social Work Practice (Itasca,
Ill.: F.T. Peacock, 1973); Howard Goldstein, Social Work Practice (Columbia: University
of South Carolina Press, 1973); Gale Goldberg and Ruth Middleman, Social Service
Delivery: A Structural Approach to Social Work Practice (New York: Columbia University
Press, 1974); and Max Siporin, Introduction to Social Work Practice (New York: Macmillan
Publishing Co., 1975).
2. Carel B. Germain, "The Ecological Perspective in Casework Practice," Social
Casework 54 (June 1973): 323-30.
3. See, e.g., William Gordon, "Basic Concepts for an Integrative and Generative
Conception of Social Work," in The General Systems Approach: Contributions toward an
Holistic Conception of Social Work, ed. Gordon Hearn (New York: Council on Social Work
Education, 1969); and William Schwartz, "Social Group Work: The Interactionist Ap-
proach," in Encyclopedia of Social Work, ed. Robert Morris (New York: National Associa-
tion of Social Workers, 1971).
4. In these situations, it is essential that the client and worker work on the same
problem in living at any moment in time. Otherwise, one might, for example, focus on
an environmental definition while the other might focus on a psychological identity
definition.