Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Forces.
http://www.jstor.org
Reviewer:J TIMMONSROBERIT,TulaneUniversity
tend to have many small producing companies spread in cheap labor locations
around the world who do little product design and gain relatively little of the
overall product's value. On the other hand, producers of capital-intensiveproducts
such as automobiles, aircraft, and semiconductors create vertically organized
corporationsthat design, produce, and market the product. Because they need to be
near centers of innovation and supply efficiency, these types of production facilities
have tended to migrate far less, instead clustering in a few regions.
The volume reveals the largely neglected common task of geographers and
sociologists in examining the shifting world economy. Some authors include
geographic analysis, but sociological techniques and theory are still relatively
underdeveloped.
From my view the volume has two significant flaws. First,it makes little effort
throughout to bring readers who are not familiar with the current lingo and
conceptual debates up to speed. For this reason I would hesitate to use the volume
in the classroom except with students who have been familiarizedwith theories of
development through post-Fordism. Second, unlike Gereffi's previous edited
volume, this volume lacks a strong introductorychapter and a summary chapter.
Some points become repetitive and the volume would have benefitted from better
coordinationand division of labor.
In spite of these limitations, this volume will become an importantlink in the
improved understanding by social scientists of how macrostructureslike the world
economy depend upon and influence gender relations, household structures,
ethnicity, labor control, state policies, and regional geography.
This is an ambitious essay of some 140 pages, including five appendixes. About
one-third of it is devoted to Max Weber's methodological writings; the rest to a
sociology of intellectuals that starts from Weber,but moves on ratherquickly to the
author's own classificationsand theories.Though rich in suggestions and broad in
scope, the book is not free of faults. Likesome other English-speakingauthors,Sadri
draws exclusively upon those of Weber'sworks that are translatedinto English;but
historians are rightly uncomfortablewith this limitation.In any case, some of what
Sadri writes about Weber's account of the cultural and social sciences seems less
than solidly anchored in the relevant sources (including Weber'scritiqueof Eduard
Meyer, whom Sadri consistently names Mayer).The result is an occasional lack of
clarity in an admittedly difficult and controversialfield.
Thus Weberdid not, as Sadri claims, "dismiss actual existing meaning from the
realm of sociological interest";in fact, he criticized Simmel for neglecting an agent's
actually intended meaning, and he referred explicitly to "known subjective
attitudes" in a passage cited by Sadri himself. He did try to exclude mere empathy
and the agent's own testimony as privileged sources of our knowledge about
motives and beliefs. Elsewhere, Sadri seems to confound interpretive hypotheses
with ideal types; the former must be verified, the latter play a heuristic role that
requires further clarification. More generally, Sadri gives too little attention to