Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • IS 4290 Pt.2-1992 - 5884

    Uploaded by

    kr_ananth
    5 views8 pages

    Original Title

    IS 4290 Pt.2-1992_5884

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views8 pages

    IS 4290 Pt.2-1992 - 5884

    Uploaded by

    kr_ananth

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 8
    ts 4290 ( Part 2) : 1992 180 2632-2 : 1985 ada ara Rea Tera ava hTat art 2 egfat aaefaa, aie ener a fae eater atte onferr frat gat (a@at gadtert ) Indian Standard ROUGHNESS COMPARISON SPECIMENS PART 2 SPARK-ERODED, SHOT-BLASTED AND GRIT-BLASTED, AND POLISHED ( First Revision ) UDC 620°179'118 ; 620115°82 @ BIS 1992 BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002 October 1992 Price Group 2 Engineering Metrology Sectional Committee, LMD 05 NATIONAL FOREWORD This Indian Standard ( First Revision ) which is identical with 1SO 2632-2 : 1985 ‘Roughness comparison specimens — Part 2: Spark-eroded, shot-blasted and grit-blasted, and polished’, issued by the International Organization for Standardization ( 1SO ) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards on the recommendation of the Engineering Metrology Sectional Committee (LMD 05) and approval of the Light Mechanical Engineering Division Council. The original version of this standard 1S 4290 : 1968 ‘Specification for roughness comparison specimens’ was based on BS 2634 ( Parts 1 to 3) “Specification for roughness comparison specimens’, issued by the British Standards Institution. Harmonization of the standard with International Standard has been made by the adoption of ISO 2632 ( Parts 1103) in three parts of |S 4290, The other two parts in the series are: Part 1 Roughness comparison specimens — Turned, ground, bored, milled, shaped and planed Part 3 Roughness comparison specimens — Cast surfaces Wherever the words ‘International Standard’ appear referring to this standard, they should be read as ‘Indian Standard’. Comma (, ) has been used as a decimal marker while in Indian Standards, the current practice is to use point ( . ) as the decimal marker. In this adopted standard, reference appears to certain International Standards for which Indian ‘Standards also exist. The corresponding Indian Standards which are tobe substituted in their place are listed below along with their degree of equivalence for the editions indicated: International Corresponding Indian Standard Degree of Standard Equivalence 1so3 IS 1076 (Part 1):1985 Preferred numbers — Identical ‘Series of preferred numbers Iso 1302 Is 10719: 1983 Method of indicating surface Identical texture on technical drawings ISO 2632-1 1S 4290 (Part1): 1992 Roughness comparison Identical specimens: Part 1 Turned, ground, bored, milled, shaped and planed ( first revision ) 1SO 2632-3 IS 4290 (Part3):1992 Roughness comparison Identical specimens: Part 3 Cast surfaces { frst reviston ) The concerned technical committee has reviewed the provisions of ISO 468, ISO 1880, ISO 3274 and ISO 4287-1 referred in this adopted standard and has decided that they are acceptable for use in conjunction with this standard. 1$ 4290 (Part 2): 1992 180 2632-2: 1985 Indian Standard ROUGHNESS COMPARISON SPECIMENS PART 2 SPARK-ERODED, SHOT-BLASTED AND GRIT-BLASTED, AND POLISHED ( First Revision ) 1 Scope and field of application This part of !SO 2632 specifies the characteristics of specimens of spark-eroded, shot-blasted and grit-basted, and polished surfaces which are intended for tactile and visual comparison with workpiece surfaces of similar lay, produced by similar manufacturing methods. Itis complementary to !SO 2632/1 and ISO 2632/3. 2. References 180 3, Preferred numbers — Series of preferred numbers. 180 468, Surface roughness — Parameters, their values and general rules for specitying requirements. 180 1302, Technical drawings — Method of indicating surface texture on drawings. 1S0 1880, instruments for the measurement of surface rough rness by the profile method — Contact (stylus) instruments of progressive profile transformation ~ Profile recording instru: ‘ments. 'S0 2692/1, Roughness comparison specimens — Part 1: Turned, ground, bored, milled, shaped and planed. 180 2632/3, Roughness comparison specimens — Part 3: Cast surfaces. 1803274, Instruments for the measurement of surface roughness by the profile method — Contact (stylus) instru ‘ments of consecutive profile transformation — Contact profile ‘meters, system M. 180 4287/1, Surface roughness — Terminology ~ Part 1: Sur face and its parameters. 3. Definitions 3.1. roughness comparison specimen: A specimen sur Tace of a known surface roughness parameter representing & particular machining or other production process. The spacimen is used to alv® design personnel guidance on the foe! ‘and appearance of the particular production process and roughness grade, and to enable workshop personnel 10 ‘evaluate and control workpiece surfaces by tactile and visual comparison with the specimen surface. 3.2. lay: The direction of the predominant surface pattern, ‘ordinarily determined by the process used in producing the sur face, Other terms used to describe surface characteristics or measu- rement are defined in 180 4287/1 4 Methods of manufacture ‘The specimens shall be manufactured as follows: a) by electro-forming positive replicas of master surfaces; b) by making positive replicas in plastics or other materials lof master surfaces which represent the feel and appearance ff the natural manufactured surface; €)_ by direct application of the production process which the specimen is intended to represent (individually manufac- tured specimens) 5 Surface ch teristics Master surfaces for reproduction or their replicas, and in- dividually manufactured specimens (see clause 4) shall exhibit only the characteristics resulting from the natural action of the ‘manufacturing process which they are intended to represent. 6 Ranges of roughness grades “The ranges of roughness grades shall be as given in table 1. 7 Sampling lengths The sampling lengths given in table 2 shall be used in evaluating the specimens. In the case of repetitive profiles, the sampling length shall be rounded: off to include the nearest greater whole number of cycles. 18.4200 ( Part 2): 1902 180 2692-2 ; 1985 Table 1 — Ranges of roughness grades of roughness comparison specimens. Manufacturing method _sporceroded | shot and grit-blasted L polished ‘Arithmetical mean deviation, R, a an ro om ie mH = = = 7 0,008" = = a 5 ora = = S = ozs = = S 0.05 & = S = on 4 = 5 02 a 02 8 6 oa 6 : Es 2 og 2 = - a 16 3 = . 15 | 32 125 7 - 63 250 63 250 = 5 25 500 25 500 = = = - 2 1000 7 = * See note 3 below. NoTES 11 The valuet given in table 1 are selectod from one of the preferred series of ISO 468. In cases when itis necessary to provide specimens in intermediate values, these should be chosen from the R10 sales of preferred numbers (see ISO 3} 2. Consin of the finer values aro included primary to give design office personnel some ides of te differences that can be detected (between, for ‘example 0,006, 0,0125, 0,025, 0,05 and 0,1 um) by visual means. 2 In actual measurements, the required accuracy may not be attainable to dotermine the values marked with an asterisk (*). Table 2 — Sampling lengths Manufacturing methods Arithmetical mean spark eroded [shot and grt-basted | devietion, Ry ‘Sampling lengths ~ i iin mm im Tm in wm ie 0,006 025 S - | - ~ 008 0.003 0125 os = = = a 0.08 0.003 0,025 1 = - - - 0.08 0.008 0.05 2 S = Ss = 0.25, oot oa 4 - = = = 025 0.01 02 8 = = os | os. o8 0.03 04 6 og oo | og, 0.03 ee ee 08 2 os 0.03 08 0.03 = - 16 3 og 0.03 os 0.03 - - 32 15 25 on 25 on = = 63 250 25 on 25 | oon = = 8 500 25 on 25 on = = 2 1000 = = | 2s on Seo e 8 Calibration Sufficient readings shal be taken across the direction of lay ofthe surface at evenly distributed positions to enable the mean value and the standard deviation to be determined. 25 readings have been found sufficient for many engineering surfaces but this number may bbe decreased for periodic surfaces or increased to meet excessive scatter of results. ‘The mean value of the readings shall not vary from the nominal value by an amount greater than the percentage of the nominal value 2 given in table 3. ‘The standard deviation from the mean value shall not be greater than an amount equal to the percentage of the effective value as

    You might also like