# t : t , Sheatlntehehwan Root. OFZ * i Daily Pebiniey Chock? to be proforeel fv Oech Pegd Ache 1D) Rect Corere Ane : (US Om in Acbion Plan wh OFT Gercf + @ Pete 10 munkionoyf tr Reniew Sovtem . 1 Dates 2ef1[21, % for Dat Megane add foes wsdl intr ©. tree Cre. fs be acgpirecl , YT 'feehucna tale j wel® QD Sor racisy Tht tne & Meittmet rie ota snpied| © QD SY Coreeithee 10 be © 2 pee Netom aes nealece die lek ma S8RR ne, . a deacieel cegican a ML “) R ai veh bron “b F NI Clay Cerner | = Eaalaahon Arowrel a O Pom Tetdint Whe gin aie MAM Ze ML tute ay frm ete A be : Corpornts oko Te Actedee Cri eva fo be Generated . @ Conguespemee & fouorel Wv be Chaved 4 Wmnait meky @ ine wale coe Scanned with CamScannera am elong wit Spar TT refarna ? BB leat Bas FY Torn Quer ) Bank Aclinamty Cbpiot(Py-€) SNK Oradea Cop} ©->) ov (2- =5). S Worle Oyler ope { Cotbed / Poocise Joh . ae hei. Pu Cobipieak - ~ 4 High Finis. ps Bt with TeLer ofter TéL W) 7 (nt. Ceefe tr Public eh *Ciitbome bepe ' OWE ah (QD) Veneer Rae! STATvTORY Co wihow iy Leyt 5 Ge ort Bae GST rhe, OAL © “Enhise @st Lod h dort Whim perind g Pee 'ces. thca el Met he Michgadl op Lost ao os © Bolt Frost k Bom Stefinenh . a0 Corh pote 2p © Mee 4 oo Se AeA, bed Hy Duel prod ¢ : © gen AE Sieate pe fhe QO Psond eg? 2 Poumsrel fr Jureo hawt Safely : Scanned with CamScanner| OFL e utd © Leg & oft regplirevotnd pion clea Pota'ey 7 © COR HACK Tovget Avot unline wits foliey . ef 4 > fore anipest bored Leae ay furs pend habeol Parmele . 8 late eae pee Pres tho ; Heivareh mondnnttsn fronldof Five fans ia Menhin in TA Di ert he aclalee] jn SOP, ae i © aiid gos » theebricod Aaporel £ Co get ha pred Blend acelin iy cS Beorcaune Mtorlel be inline waite Prtsenbina pehin CAA , Berk Seuiifapll] 8) Dri i ‘ y holy ry 8 inns Driinen Conve ladion vai, Pring ret 6PM -9 Te ndedet ¢ Tape obawe tom Calibrohin Nequiverot £ odeo ys fem Dig Ht Maly nape, Atapred £ Gtplet + Q Sit Bp Tey tttnde peg'p yn Ol Actpeutbsility ms eine rele viper m manual « 2 THOT MRA fume jeon THE. fw C Site C edelee] Wink Pema : aif AP obey Juguivedl hy cua dat Oo ey le fen latter. 2 Prenton eke ; ih . rade fe pee elt mh ai, ra Cotigicad, & Vibe de Coders 2) Orbinicd heeprramtot bead Seon Jota Ch fectivuc€ target ®) SP hor wot veitee! buted! on fen ce Fela loop Fouled fren the armplages. gel it fehl Co Mebed wih TA , ay Co prign od mdamee Aref [Pat srcidadt Snel safest in Plo inFY. Scanned with CamScanner~ peso ti 4 : GSM Star rating assessment bey findings and feedback form Tsetiarntags he ay ie NOD Enircontrend saleded cloerg 2 doodle eee fe beg, rmocle. oe eecis ackivity, Like & fe 2)> int + oh 1@ AN fie ited hogeerel A PEL ane need) 4d de owt yy to to be. ool. ©) ni eeaiing, rrodule ta to be. Wedkifie 1B) Clow. ae me ade. G qh all tre Obtonvetion Ketate Koficly. ne : © fi paged PES pened to be, idlowhf~y ly Prk 's 4 aan née to be Ame As Cee Ot plan : 9 30) (0) Feedtiack by C0 (TSL employee) and Vendor: “2) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes/No 2) Behavior of Auditor? ‘Ans: Good | Satistactory 3) Feld visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans:Yes/No 4}Have you understood Auditors Inputs? ‘as: Yes/No $5) Any supgesticn on the assessment process of auditors? ns: (©) Contract Owner Detalis (151 employee)}: a)tmatig b) Mobile number: + Name & Signature: : (0) Verdor's Detatis: . 8) Vendor code: bj Organization name: ‘ Email id . A) Mobile number: e)Name ‘% Signature: (€) Assessor's Namie and Signature: Shrew Quins ANG, Arh von suaroate 6 R02) ne FAD PHM rocation Electate.cd TWD ~ (E3) scanned with Camscanner Scanned with CamScanner. OE UMA Ew. = Dt -U]06 [24 O Bre geatel molar in Orqaatrzefion Q News b be oaldealin Fue 2 Policy tr aclelol fe Zero hewn & Zoro inetnd ata th TEppl . 3) SoPR RRA from out As foshmerd TSPRLR THA Comprollee) D Pretest 8 fost hat hee tobe deetapiol fe OB Module Agia. re) TAL Quartion Reap. fev Bhalohon . e) INT! Comp oh of operstrr + ® pret Cheedelict teste Mp Gemmed dot < obumf Get & routed in #16 Chobe ® "Pactoay feel a declan Check F L8) Th SS Prelit TEPD Lt weal fo & n- © { Gil) Semmiry dmckt Rese Yo Prelit in mumth Z jamobe TSPpe Sign. © Sctets ovleowsx by be wecordleak Koby incode in TB Tom o a FE Se ~ Ee On be ty TSPBL a ; 8 Ne vs hb Legaeed Shen | ferrari K Preepuitin fo be dnelvolad’. Scanned with CamScannerannense OM Star rating stvenrment bey findings and feedback form t Qebecwe Ldevgetr Ae be der fr costa Yee : GB Poterde reyes to be cifine i rt & toner "GB Peyome flan te be dot cfr alt ide tifeedd emeryznes, dita Fine 4 © Alvanccinted bagel & Me's to be waa in Jee 4 O Efffectineys OR trainrgy do he rrccetavecl + 3 ©) Syren Ao davclqa fo tae CAPA prom Bevery J relaber 4 Self dofehy Initidive to be taken ” Aytrdia to be tee &- ComclPingr Comperrgn s Pretevied SoPfsue? cto he chiylacd of He Ate 5 a 1) U8) feeduach by 00 (TSE emmptoyee] end Vander: 1 reg ao fete Senge etme? ann: 157 Na HT ars. 7 Satntactory 3) Fret wigs by tse Auditor? ars: VHT He a1 Have, ood Auditor's inputs? An. Tf a '5} Any surgestion on the axserument procest of muditers? i an Gord] Acsessmenh proecsd WOR? q {€)} Contract Owner Detally: [151 emptorwe] . corn shematig as eth est pladp gteal by Motte nomber: Mame & Sanatere => 3456 . Wehaene ceteheTe || ESET [D] Vendor's Ootaits: i a) Vendor code: 5 =" WOrmaniation nama: Shes Bata) Gobanha? zen . Gina d » ShmaayatagUahrt te DS" + gh Mobile member: SION HBO T Gieone Seamer yout, DOS too nh Dhiven Gheenben a fom & rome avacone 31812) nine fet £09 ssenon Enginaainge Pret FE) Anassor’s Plame and Sign Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form: Key Audit findings: 1. Commitment towards occupational health is not been defined in the policy. 2. Objective related to occupational health and legal & other requirement are not identified and also action pian to achieve the objective and target are not evident. Closure report of internal audit. Modification of JHA as per the clause no 1.3 of CSM report. Employees coverage plan during the training for the employees are evident. OP's is not evident in regional languages and in pictorial format. Occupational health hazards are not been identified in the JHA, Observation written in the report of site severity audit report doesn’t matches with actual severity rating, 9. Corrective action taken against the findings raised during the audit doesn’t matches with the root causes identified for the same. 10. Review system for site severity audit is not evident. 111. Analysis report for the near miss is not evident. (8) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor: a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yés / No. b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: God / Satisfactory c}Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: ¥8S/ no d)Have you understood Auditor’s inputs? ans: Yes / No e) Any sussestion on assessment snocess gf audors? Ans: TO Come More phe 7 (C) contract Owner (TSL employee - Name & signature/P.No): 15081 » Dipak Gherh Email id Lipek> yoorh@ fabeotest-(#™ Mobile number: 9234501605 (0) Vendor code: <7] uy Organizationname:Srvee Balad? BnsenParices, Email id Mobile number: 9#038364, 94 (E) Name of the person and signature: Pind Keener Code Assessor Name and signature: Prashant Kumar |S 4.Audit Date 12/08/2021 Time 09:30AM if 6 Location: Engg & Projects , West Bokaro hr aw asd we A ibe ees Direnn| Kar derodin 16H Os a Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #7 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form (A) Key Audit findings: 1. Health related target is to be set. 2. Roles & responsibilities are need to be defined as per the organizational structure. Response plan to be set of all identified emergency situations. All associated hazards are need to be identify in JHA. Closer report to be made of the finding of conducted external audit Concept of taking CAPA need to be made clear. Other Company near miss are need to be share with the employees Campaign need to be done as per set plan. (8) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes / No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Good / Satisfactory c)Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes / no d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? Ans: Yes / No e) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? SNARE Ans: (C) Contract Owner (TSL employee - Name & signature): Email id Mobile number: (0) Vendor code: Organization name: Email id Mobile number: (E) Name of the person and signature: Assessor Name and signature: Shivam Srivastava 4.Audit Date ...19-07-2T..... Time Pm..Location ..Haldia(Assessment done through MS teams) Scanned with CamScannerCant tar patieg ste gimrent kny Ledings and temcback farm Lave thn ohjectroe aradtatget are net mvedent neon ent hied td fy ct Bea HOPE YT teen Went (b teteoed tha meg to erpathent the comtred mem iteritaek ithe ok jer hanect Sewn tater ¥Pt rare 5 Cuatiimer feectace om upechcand were cars #1 wel ur tne FATA fd the seventy Teron je je mparte ot ute an see aude begets deat matches with he eegucice mansgerast i aegtante byt ssyntity al the wolatens are ent beat Juil devioge mem emergency presaredneas (Tz ings 37 not i not endert peg nerd tential forte avy menting t now dare: 1G. fut the root ceute clentiied 1 the ree anal property wentiied, and alss the frequency for Ine repestirg a! ecdent fase tent are natstelinest [iJ fesasare ny CO [7S empkone ap Ame cre ama ee bh) Heravisr > ame sane #5 een . ffhele wns eon sucted by the Awd#=0 Ant. Yeas oa wo Gave wou sneer ann 14/0 es cha agen acura ont ae name Sagres): MR- ATUL KUT TRIFAT IL [Cycantract Sacer (TR ernplereee © SHS ded patna take stich toes 8042084544. IP) venem ste Bo ceranation rare MARESH KUMAR L cn. CP) ATA eraid Kwtindy A nKep Leta remerume 4364933 235~ [E [tame ot tte peron and vgnature: 4 KavsHik KUADUA Y Cu Avedon Name and ugrature. Prashant? Piped P No sau") Wer duauen Date 17.11 2020Time 08-30locaton Weit Bekara Scanned with CamScanner—_— Wwe Frben brte~ THOS- CSM _Star rating assessment key find - a i ‘ey finding and feedback from pti eae Baie : Betas AE reece ts + uy noe ch hoo ie fs I 4 perach ish peter. per Gele, Ate te all rebel Yo be prepress Ss Deron igen g~ Connell byl abet f o redecd il byl aherig & db Indic OWeope we ble ly wat fee ea ee diy taf AM Bot Abele Used ig ack pend by. Te mee/s se? he pe iw we, oe idertecfied toi theond a ste a? Laren Kae Ne te Set wake, fal shell 3) Neal pen sef- tefalzo L A lol. 4 L ceneelive Ge a} inte aL. dase af i ike athe (ren ¢ a tert cae a! preven exedion Hanes Live. clk dls2sl? Rlrwse Gervecdive Gedion leben amie Be jerm ck wehdipey he drace cover bed tuk aediew Laden de find gu Bimbo pelt je fla Bete WAlazp betes velk hey AF vem Hes DO : pee Rag ae Lee E TS pctekat ely er pale fsowet oy fe preec Lucee do be ‘eX } ieotkine ae ooh She Poe vege ral g prcclasbe reel Sue evelepeale Be is efcdive mem # prides HO eis previeles Repo anallre cern ian to bee Commer y).4 proeclers Jo he develaped And Com Lp do oll eepleny werted DA probes valid quelled lew do, be madle for cerrrest B19, Mild inelcelee Ritewtve Sot hell be ie plas St shit covey Soe queee HL ncn weno bt) ! ? Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form (A) Key Audit findings: 1. the other requirement like customer requirement are not identified in legal register 1. action plan to achieve the objective and target is not evident 2. But no internal and external audit reports are evident. 3. control measures are not planned as per the hierarchy of control measures in JHA and also occupational health hazards are not been identified in the JHA. Required training are not properly identified in the JHA. the TATA STEEL. 4. skill mapping has not been done for the employees in terms of getting training need identification. 5. Customer feedback on specific and generic clauses related to work order has not been taken yet from 6. But observation written in the reports of site severity audit doesn’t matches with actual severity rating. 7. awareness level regarding the near miss is found to be inadequate evaluation done on the basis of interaction with the employees. 8. Consequence management system available but the consequence management has not been planned by considering severity of the violations. (B) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes/No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans; Good / Satisfan*--~ Field visit conducted " _migrosoft. com is sharing you Scanned with CamScannerCSM Star rating assossment key findings ond fosdback form Ht (A) Kay Audit Rndings: 5s 1" Mowat to Lis escent te Un nechie tp tev? faatiln 5 3 Meee lee pi + PPE ate de 48 Magar morticp sy ines fPEb tor dom uc gets lou lat eR A Res fan eurred, Oo heperdhn 5 Weole el ation p ps to = 2A kdent Nef plrewaLont Ee Ceri dian Ui FEE ately {31 Feedlueck by €0 (TSL employee) and Vendor; * Nea wera fem C8. orqaninals: 8) Are the aurlitors follgwins 8 SeOpE of assessment? fe lee Co phic: APS YC No - ifius by) Behaviour of auctor? beet back on clemed Ane 566 J Satisfactory fa tpl, . ‘iFled vist conclucted by the Auditor? © TRE Debts Pap wes aba Ana 9 no ian ileal oa ‘Stave you underitsed Aucitor's inputs! Aya Aue YIN O Aiantmt Relhin We enn pleyes ¢} Any surgestion on rasexsimant process of audhors? dA Chante . ans Ni (6) Cootratt emer (SL employee - Name & signature): RATES H Cid RA CGC A) Emattis hey 6. peal Cr. Mobile number: 923481795) $F) Vendor code: KARS, IS AG 1, 154 SD Orvanization name: KAG RE TRANSPO eT Emailic Kalores (nto bing® ger Minis nme too Gerqzon CE) Name of the person and signature: CMD TIQVED -ffv SAR 4-Audit Date. RE] P8I2020... Tine 1225216, Location HE, © Scanned with CamScannerput Fincing saya t Le sunt ag tm lke potential) Ro saat toh Dey Con tiednp 2 Onto rbot et flu Catal wot cape Leer, ma im 5E'S Goceen Oy Caged Lontet AN Us arotih Ghe ‘Se Lowrise , Cue Gtk, PPE to bee uel fect Wa wonders gr ron ttly PRE Hagard ws pping ly la dou bn for |i Speifie DalFeetpen fe . Grkeoewlh ancth eared lee Concent ty Comat feerkerl an ty et Die Repoa til wi Mating *Perrand [iz coe: el fiae bale Cangaige Boog eget Medtin h UD adiow » © Bek Sahih Sapwrah Payor at ne jad Gos gh04nes Cagle Ian Fananciat yom y CO (TSL employes) and Vendor : (C) Contract Ova oe eh mr betested Com . enone ganization name, TATA STEEP DEMEC uuyonsor code: 38S smemanune “TA4 fosecy eheherderl | Gon badalictumnns Kr De ga 342 105% PRODUCTS (Per ete wn) Absa, ag ei a. 0b Ge. Comfereas Rew, FE B4Sd2>F Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 CSM Star rating assestment key findings anit feceback Lorn (A) Key Audit findings: A decefet 1 @Acten 4 flan +0 toa det HO Aeliove. deb phy echive dec 1@ AN anoastateck hagavol +o he rolenbyy in JHA, 2 Gremsd |Eaterndl audit to be Grelucect os ne AEh Plow (bi aethatl Ea ti collec and @ Clonee safert 40 be made fat 2) Are the aud tors following Scope of assessment? . Ans: Yes {No He chienvatton Uainzl in ) Behavior of Auditor? Ans; Good / Satisfactory dene walle IField visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes /no. @ Concept need 40 be mals aHave you understood Autor sinus? yay cleay a Faking carn. Ans: Yes /No fe) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? Ans (Contract Owner (TSt employee- Name signature): VIKASH prasad. Emalid VI Kash: Pracady Dain Neblenunber 9237068433 whe“ Ta [et (DVendor code: Le AS, Organization name: Gx S+ ConsPpuUcH'ON CO. Emaid 956% Deck Orediffrt seme Jorg IS4S (£) Nam of the person and signatur SATEIE SIAM “belbsSer, Nee tI, ‘Assessor Name and signature: Shivam: Gan Ul Nowe Audit Date ......Time ... ... Location... n° ala ayer — Here Plant DAM ADT DT Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure at (CENA Star rating astestment key findings ant feuiack frm (AD Rev aut fingngs: 1 tal Heatly serlated Aecrge 2@ Ar deck om arcgncy 4! | s Gal onde rcaedt hegarct to be idlewhfy In HA. & Galas contro) madsera, FO he ieemipy + | +6 be set , tcctions ane reac! fO 6 {2 FeedBack by CO 751 empleyea} and vendor = | 3) Ate the ators following Scepecal assessment? @ Eyer ivvenays g traning 4b dns: Yor] Na 1) Behavior of udtor? he measmredt ‘ Ans Gaga Sattactery oy aretsubncedasesby he aur © Sofory meus menting mreck nw Ype/ no i dave you understood Auditor's Inputs? to he hone. ad fer [gob Ans: Yes/No plan «Any suggestion enasicssment process auditors? ns (C)Contract Owner (151 employee Name & signature): @ Ter meng gem ent Beyer Ema GUInh. by Ostekscled Cem Moblenumber Heche. igh; OBLsederm 7935094712 te be hene. on (oyvendor cote: Dae Organlzaton names Tals Atockies, WES tmailid: badalkamar KareDde Mobile number: , a tev adie Maree enol on $4 auctit : 1 teats @ conceps of rahin AssessorNare and signature: Shar Satara [Lobos o hui Oate Tens Loerton GF CAPA Rock V0 nw 6): ace! que male clecor + yo Ww) _ dese SD) const am Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findi Faken ani assessment hey ning and feedback form 7) S MISDS for Aebvication « SL Sreke® learow At. ® yo’ Kenrom AMack Jo be ineduale in gia & Smenpery System tf be imf lane A mB Gamernt or Copubsy Keof Coscte 4. Preven acfiow Mo he fl SY dese ren ta A op Voreca bs clone AY in Wearmice cc )Msos Ta SPU { Semerihy fhe fit ; EOE Rh eal gt Oe EN ae Gleued fy fe gs \ Plam Es add in Ppes Yet yy PES pegpemey < Bul é A Mine Sx Gre GA H bel hornet hhe @ Lorniy ucomnnngt real d add .| a D Hon © fale Tp @ Paper & berety be CICYT pleretigion fron Phy bey WD Tov Apeci fe chet "9 ar i (6) Feeat s dor py a eel = reedback by CO {TsLemployee} and Vendor: (5) Calthration x Peewee | Checklist ¢ Fil fey Mic ype a) Are the pasos following Scope of assessment? ) Rnckea wy ans: Y87 No & iG b) Behavir of attr? Karchus wy, ' Ans: Godd“/ Satisfactory Ye Sreke tat Puc. c)Field visit-conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Y8s/ no d)Have Loptertond Auditor's inputs? ‘Ans: YeS7'No e) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? Ans: NA . . {ey cobtract Owner (TSt employee -Name & signature): Samelaep Wichita (SiMe et Nee Cree: — Email id Aaneeey ahaa @Ah she number: PAHOA) {0) Vendor code: PL! 2 Organization name: Ps ¢, : ee Emailid = PScciId@ hoiwail: Com: Mobile number: mennen ats lageed /E) Name of the person and signature Fi ~ Kapil Kuno vereraonge. ‘Assessor Name and signature: HEE bv ABs - &Audit Date = Ol]if2y Time 2.79 9 uy location: Em c- Irda bn row OAe Medes Scanned with CamScannerAnnenure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and ck form 1A) Key Audit findings: 7 a ncofcher, fien ao he fax to ochtere, act chedttve, & Oates +o be Mayle . aZ Crfanigabion Ahrictuce Ae neeel ze N @ AU ‘euse ciedect emeregencey- AHWCHONS AK RECO 3 $. be iclewetify in PR , ABwity + 4 (8) gua need to be Ack— fer ba tN Neate ) Bffetvenes Ge dealing eee : g CAuxed + ( © he ‘ov ° Octo veport to be mack, Ye all te baat “ rock. 7 eaitodd In LRG wecdhb \ ole 8) ay gt os povided PpE% gxe neecl te be ‘densified in 4 ne fioe bl eeRliah 1 ee Peeing cnn nesel He be abeengtersel 10) ® Campatgn need to be dene as foe vet flan 10) Fiver ciel bene ore neal te pepe to fF-\s oy Poe nead +o {8} Feedback by CO (TSt employee) and Vendor: 1) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: ¥és/No ! tn 2) Behavior of Auditor? cll raw’ w J Ans: 60d / Satisfactory be. fle . 3) Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Geacon ~ Ans:Yes /No 4) Have you understood Auditor's inputs? Ans: ¥é&/ No 5) Any suggestion on the assessment process of auditors? Ans: No (C) Contract Owner Detalls: (TSL employee): eel 00 . 4 @fatas! nig Sosa Li Sse Utenmns 904009923 wee (0) Vendor's Details: . ae a) Vendor code: VA | b) Organization name: V2 EM ui) MEERA Nt) a}Motile number; yqg292GH— ch Email id | C1 Name & sigan roGured gon, ROA] (ey Assessor's Name and Signature: vara Gnivertewe, [hres vet Audit Date 9 wTimeL QAM tocation LS. nen Scanned with CamScannermt 1 key findings and feedback form CSM Star rating assessment cher fo drcladet 4 conte! meature srpHn Et , is if iQrabion wl Awe. a 5 seed freparedness CPR Training required , 6 Cheek peish to bectevelop of Haval Aabof | Legos aye nce fo be yeviee, Technician Roles ged» Pobe Lefine: — A PY yey — Avelysti& df weayereed By Teh Pranegerert Safety. Reqrired , wo rh eels Te ® bb eeomicreenoarennt : > spi tows fo ae he ee Reward fo >} Peay 1 Fett body Hanes ee hats ais L an je Ae j ie ; Ss ae chek listo be derelof bared on Ke goby Canpalgn on hatFa dent. (B) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : iS} Root tare y 2) Are the-cuditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes/No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Gd / Satisfactory Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes /no d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? Ans: Yes/No 6) Any sutgestion on asessment process of auditors? . (©) Contract Owner (151 employee - Name & signature’: Comwmyr) ott. (\63F0r) Ena Sener git: ottn O tsetisl trimer a iaie sence fae Pitenda co wy , Organizationname: Paran Con +S 0 af (tyne eas Graid con, Mobile number: oy 7 4 pat pata Asesor Name ane singe 049 2463F SHER VISHAL- DALY ‘Audit bate = bu i A tes tin — omg nl “be sere Scanned with CamScannerArwenste CMAN Star rating anemiconent bey Fines upd feet Forty : J epecife sua, ve im pus fey He efdae os Rec trh . firsard sin Emargrcty flan tte th he diye DOAN tale onde fed ncbated {hy Trafat troyl Be one Deine t tet BB) Fees hy C1 [TS ermptiryee| art Veridor Bs wont sel Lond ade rae acu) dui llas] te beweleset a) oe the wulitues following Soope off maccumert? bel 4 etal aati fe a ae wall bate in adeu fag 7 Sy! Ace Good / Sansfactary Fini aatt cosh ict ty ttve Aull tir? dex Yea | Mave yet understood Auditor's Input? am: Yer / Ne 2) Ap Auge estan on aiseasenent prareas af autltors? aoe le {C} Contract Gwrier [TH employee «Nasr Me soe go Eat Mabille nuinber: eFaabh oT (0) Werdor code: LOE! (Organization nar nak Tee Mobile number: Tadid {- BiAieg tu lews le os (LED Name of tte periin anil tigrature = ha ee (ne (Assersor Name antl elgralure! Bisuaetid Que (nt deine wal pn Location» Egms- Tet Tse Time Scanned with CamScanner— Date Ifrfry SDghaeet Sagedebs F ELV oF EnqT) & Safely Come Hee fotmohion Cilia - e TA cle te on & Aichi plous “f WbjechiZ Taaget & Organine hon Rew th Werkwon - ©) Gone opiibnskins Wasi On Psy Gut bh ©) Macks fn_be Caveberbsbeattn Te Tae. a eee \@ Bp Tope ay Cini ne fe oat Scanned with CamScannerjas tna ooo do be sey QUE: neo te be: ‘ yy tasted “ed bagels de PPE'S peck Jo be one ba eh BY LEY agenda do be sat a Corclucd & m oes & tob ene cloner, Jeport rz setteenter: LS 4, 4 abl He : Depanatten asin L ObAeeradion Seu: tap inf mag VRC AG sdasebae 8377 1a) ; Sioa Aa JT. a Big nctrenen G— . Ter. a Teall. sae be Cs Se ; meosured . x ‘ ; we) Clesere. Seaport We ~ dee ae be made” D- conduching. @ Anon. Campaign plan 40 be eat ak auclit , Scanned with CamScannereomfertenrey of PEE KY. fbrs } Jacket £ cheelelss i) Min > pes! < benegife if Sete a 9. Eepeopes “Pefemton p Gite, redex fy he the /g om Catto. 4 {EPO h be phibnee fo Le ntuipecl 2 for tuckler Cut? ts Pr be rhuulered ay per po, p 6 SEP Bs he hen bn ooo By tn £ hee Ba crmecctn hon & fo Shrpa lit Ap wal? : a entee {8} Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and verter pe eee ayare the fotowing Scope of assessment? on ans Ye ') Behavior ef Auditor? pee Goss | Sataactony ‘Field prensa bby the Auditor? Ans: Yet? no d}ttave yourunderstood Auditar’s inputs? Ans: Ye? No Gh Any suegestion on assessment process of auxitors? Ans We \ ercomne Owner (St ermployse Name R saratured: Milind Be Soy? egal Emanid , Smnne PE ES7SO 7, Mobile number: Sremsaaeess (0) Vendor code: = Organization same: SMEEE \eu CA meee ada € S, Email id Mobde number: ¥ Pet emsrhs &S UE Mane ofthe penanandsentie 37 § ee eseeet £92 84 24 98 Assessor Name and. WSs Keo wy sate Bs “haute Vis eL- DN Ne sauandare > 2eferfz2 Tere ge SOP Locations PHS TILISR_ Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure tt CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form (A) Key Audit findings: a vavget fo be SP any E6t py Pes pechive. D check bs of Tools & Jacke’ fo he define, @ thadard nf Toate 9 Tacklen I fro dedive, @D Chr test define Sn conte! meatuye 81 SHAD Neat SH Byers fo be mer Sined fash. why -2 Woralisés vrepesle tobe alene. @ came Seay theedt a Ng Cot fevig ° ete. alnctien © PPEX hataoes ) PSene tee at, . “8 6 Afplie Ble 51h, “<4 pew o mi 7S chacKHAk fo be prepared on job basin. page. BBenifh jo fe define for canfvan, (8) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : 30 Severt D5 Aadli, a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? ‘Ans: 957 No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Ggod” / Satisfactory Field visit conducted by the Auditor? ns: Yes n0 d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? ‘ns: Yas? No e) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? Ans; Well Compruultafed’ uc Caf eb7 ConCetut + Po = 1702 (©) Contract Owner (TSL employee - Name & signature}: VIKASH pAcAD katte] - emais qsee_2ed(Bsedlfrinl Co— sorte qurver, 9071 4/ P54 ue tron C0 (0) Vendor code: A © Organization name: (4--s'Co STA Email id + Mobil ibe Le [eitoncotenorantemie Gabbe Singh. Prop SAE S Assessor Name and signatu Is HEK= DNV 2:00PM Location» Lie Plot- TSR A.audt Dte:-24pi]a 2. Tm we Scanned with CamScannerjeg ameseret hey figs anc feedtnach harry Ahenbbef of prod t wl@ de abel bona dit aby wee We cepthearts Cran wpe SS C Cmetsnse Poe gh) Cpricate Captety BP Pbveese et Beat S of! camping’ kat Gute be crm Beastie . © gued we ar ben ded te of 34 WY) pegeu) OFT E eee Barc Hea Ful tlre fox, Ue te ddan chor pall | £ Jas Teale pe end eh ach by C0 77S eempoywel and weencter aj Ace tw tea following Scaoe wit rturntinent st Aube? Ane Good"? bathecery eifiea ited by We Races? any tet ne aleve yea urterntpod ucts puts? ang tet? he Aer suigerstion ex xsarsnrers pratt of uet Lis deste umber Divwrke see [ROO BPYLO! — Bearesmor name: Ton yagdnmde Slaw trad [| mara of te phan ad CNT fb, Woe At ln ~ Propel Anupitee Martie. ard uprature Arveuere Vistar saustome Dior br Tew Zr fey waren DOI TEL Le prota pub Scanned w CamScannerAnnexure m, (GM Star rating assessment hey findings and feedback form (1 Key Audit findings: 4 TPA AWG fhe of acdvitien & dee wecdined re PLaaniny Meguired vb PREG took Beker, f Prats ey Ute cet + DTA avellblt wide Ina deg nel e pre HOP HL Weegee Placard Sry FoteNel barand and © SALLY loredva) Hreetent “fin ad cy ke improved. hicadvosabe D dremeeee burl Uad Clay indieubry sheke fin tnadege 9 Tretney ficedback Gusher bed wanda induction tretntig dy te. Com Det Ht Ww earploqee . ) Mew wiey Veper DR ivestiontien wed Bone PSH Co My Miceweck by COTS employee) and Vendor: dy Vout veewe gens: weret ewe yeod iworedy 2) Ate the auditors following Scope ol assessment? Aas: Yes No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Good Satisfactory ‘eld wit conducted by the Auditor? fan Yer/ ‘ite yu undestoed Astor put? ane verte ©) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? i (C) Contract Owner (TS employee - Name & Signature): Fait Teen petviahl sen 10} vendor cone. 1ZOOMP Feed. Organization name. (Bere gar oie Semin sockessosy. Se eee a as ae rete \a a ¥ Scanned with CamScanner‘Annexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form . (A) Key Audit findings: 1. InJHA, environmental concern is missing, PUC as control measures not included. 2. Continual improvement trend has been prepared as per the set objectives and target but some part is.missing considering business perspective, Training perspective , Health & Environment perspective etc . 3. Insite severity report, root cause not done on why why analysis- BBS part is missing of different level specially the generic and specific training like BBS ete. 5. Training on traffic rules amendment is missing from the plan. 6. Purpose and benefits is missing in the executed campaign i.e for World environment day. 7, Criteria has been set for applying various level of consequences but as per the record one violation has been noted for which consequences has not been applied... Root cause is not done on why why analysis in Near Miss. 8 9. Pictorial SOP’s to be reviewed. 10. Emergency planning system needs to be reviewed appropriately in terms of onsite and enroute emergency situation. (8) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : Mr. Hemant Sarna- P.No- 149325(CO) a) Areshe auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans:Wves / No b) Eee ‘Auditor? Ans:“Good / Satisfactory }Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes / no, d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? ans.Nes / No e) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? Ans: Nene {C) Contract Owner (TSL employee - Name & signature]: Mr. Hemant Sarna- P,No- 149325(CO) Email id - hsarna@tatasteel.com Mobile number: 7763807685 (0) Vendor code:17353,17960 Organization name: Union Roadways Email id :- Jamshedpur@unionroadwaysitd.com Mobile number: 9308791173 ) (E) Name of the person and signature :- Mr. Sanjay Kr. Shrivastava- Dy. Manager __/aJy’ ‘Assessor Name and signature: Abhishek Vishal- DNV.GL ion : Jse Team Meet- online A.Audit Date = 15.06.2022 ime 2.00PM Location 45 Scanned with CamScannerAwe mre #1 C3M Star rating assessment her firings and feeithack form (AD Wey At Be fo P a a {8} Feedback by Co (151 employee) and Vendor: 1] Are the auditor: following Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes /Ko . 2) Behavior of Ausitor? Ans: Good / Satistactory 3) field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes (We 4) Have you understood Auditor's Inputs? Ans: Yes /to 5) Any suggestion on the assessment process of auditors? kos: Owner Details: (ISL employee)): Contr )Emaitis Mame & Signature: 1b) Mabile number: Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure m. CSM Star rating assessment key. findings and feedback form (A) key Audit find Awe. NG). vectif be, Softy poliese meads do be ack 6 429 i mad, ngage + . 2 BED at nas the gi AG. dbyctive. ‘L rlexget is +0 be act fe ee r © Rasporse. plo 10 we aot Goal inlaw frecl orange : @ sed ety ready to be cle for ale 5 at lon Ao te peadh to be. clone a6 foe cach ® P clued In cto be Oe ff fy(22- 22D 3) Tae, nes tO be reecnuxed) AH A 00 [rode B ffectSve ° 0) rotnleg woshion wwolsedd 1 Clerc 40 be made. dd e the, ona on. (0) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor: Je syStrfolowng Scape of assinen? AN meanytngy equipment’s ans: "Yes [No ‘ 21 Behar fist needs aa We calibrate of Ans: Good ‘7 Satisfactory . ’ 3) Fie visit conducted bythe Auditor? © Sym A ‘etirge CAPA Ans: Yes/No ‘A)Have you understood Auditors Inputs? neaclt do be . vauttena Atconsttened) « ionon the assessment process of autor 7 fas: A @) Rjenda WO he nek er conduch9. {€} Contract owner Detalzt(TSL emeleyee)}: oh cee oO apemattid C-SKeron @ ta bes hed story Ly Mobile number: a jtame d signature: Wh ne 9234660432 PSHE (D) Vendor's Detalls: 9 SNTERPRISE. 2} Vendor code: SO 2: bporganzation name: %/S SINGH ENTERPRISES eEmaitid smpartexppuscesse 20409! asl Coy a Motte number. re co2e14 lame & Signature: HK «Singh (evassessor's tame and slmature: Wovam rivantova . Unburva hredever sutton A415 /2002. rine 2u2ttatocaten LE. Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedaack form Key Ault ncings: : . eodS-+o dekines* 4. ds ob ebve alaage! y. 1 Safety Golscey fos Drieanet Oy enotlt reosy: Qd- Mocdipeat on of JHA 6k pegerner ; 43 Get) MePOA burns 2 eraPlrye ss hte wet or Prd wife the yo S>- Como’ Pei pg oe doh tA + ent 6- SEF dover PPO 1 : 8 ee epi are See an fe fo be aoe } Br OO aod argsen Gf CHE SORT oy eite qn ® fen coveni'} uy vor RH ry - one Sty aul . (8) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor: a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: ses lo ') Behavior of Auditor? Ans: _Go6d / Satisfactory c}Fteld visit conducted by the Auditor? Ang ¥eS/no d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? + ANSLYEE/ No ) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? Me Ans . (2) Conan TL ors Name 8 srature/P.o Ardk Kumar The, /Sr4ioo mall: EY. beng. fade Seal Core Mobile number: 9002.67 BROS (0) Vendor code: 19 -5Y Organizationname: He ast PeChy Lak. Emalllé measudt}echro 0 Yashor. curry Mobllenumber: Gyyn5 ge 2 04, (€) Name of the person and signature: € USED Assessor Name and signature: Prashant Kumar 4.Audit Date Time Db “2D 02! 0» Pm 5 ja! oi og Peja Meleg hy Med Scanned with CamScanner‘Annexure #1 CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form (A) Key Audit findings: s eget purpose benifit © Compa ® Denerich Spcerfre Softly clante « radssly- @ a es ane reviewed (tddde Sfely homens arcrsield, arth aryl ® aa 100 brsinnp. ratify Fo oltn (Filhor rx llr con be cefteel) Z) ANI Prepest whem to tdorfy sychew \ 7 Traini. afk. quetta fr et cout e anpalyss ba prekpask laler (Erenpeutp) @ Poke k Pesposilula of Bescudher be Filters @ chouls ror Ow! Jefe eltor deals Mndirlons @ calithenhn theeltist dur upeble bets, CB This yor review owelit ws done yet & Tredaip pou Se rouk assesveed « (B) Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor : ) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? ‘Ans: Yes /No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Good / Satisfactory )Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes / no d)Have you understood Auditor's inputs? Ans: Yes / No e) Any suggestion on assessment process of auditors? = (C) Contract Owner (TSL employee - Name & signature): Mobile number: 416 2.721940 {D) Vendor code: ie F-45, Organization name: M/S KOISHNA ENTERPRISES: Emailid Jcaustav fen @ scorn Mobile number: (E) Name of the person and signature KAVS7 AYTAMmA CPROPLA TO Assessor Name and signatur Emall id A.Audit Date 07 /0b/22 Time: 2149 0M Locatlon:- FAP, TODA Scanned with CamScannerArrreure a cM Star cating aiesiment key findings and fred ack form | nok objictive Aches 1A] Key Audit Findings: . WY Aetew an to be. aak rte tedvere- 1) Mogocrch WA ndady slo be. At & Gfrration of} Gorsncley metnads #h olf apillagclt nerdy ata be ash bye: company NP clo do be. made. atl tue oetenuedienn Hescwel tn dhe, exetornal Guid + wy Tos CB) CPR Meininny module. ve We. (ert fied! tn ee 3G) Clossx, te ne. mele of alt ther PbAasess dion 8 peniaad Ta dine wate Pe 54 Quclid + @ Campaign naodd cio be. ofone, 04 Aer det Caerdicn + ; ; @ Repent, ro be define for Comckucd ny Compeniaie . U8] Feedback by CO (151 employee) and Vendor: a 10) 1) Are the tutors lollawing Scope el mueximent? Am: Yen {No 2) Bebavies ol Auditor? Ant: Good / Sitiactory 3) Field efit conducted bythe Auditor? Ans: Yeu/ Mo: 4) Mave yi understood Auditor's input? ame: Fes Ke $]Amp wrsestion on the assesment process of sudiion? dex: (61 Contract Owner Detalls: (T3L employeelt: 7 sitmitid cl ASU. & Gel bate stecl: Com. ty Mobile number: fo 387502 3 Mame Senate: DAL p pola BE ejb {D) Vendor's Details: al Vendor cade: AY 9 1 Ormanization name: hts Gabe, “ Oiimalig | Leer Kim Phd 19 oo BY fatboy EY Mobile tarbet: oh tshs oe Sched e]Naroe & Scgrature mn Jagdvrce pa ‘Seoy Ss (Fr nmestorsrtame and Signature: aU Aiea QO esa oa, Cen bene Audvore JSD A902 rene At soation. POE. sa * Scanned with CamScannerat bey findings and fredback form a1 0 naads * ° we nuulit findlogs! A bn atthes corgiveel rea Qommdyens toes pod Ry yoabth Fe ty fol! Se howe 2” si Eminent Jealedad Aovah ne ie be ~+2F Jo athion-e— Cyaan ment Porites no 2 40 ‘of Hea 2.0. ~ a @ Peres oe eee NN plon naod iy 4 ye onesyond - ra velicle we ao wee 42k for Con Star catlog ascessine 4 Preoce chrvre- vs a] 5) ‘Treainina. neo cls « uo pe- prvidad oy fp plon a \bhiele & documaud , cfetenlA ret 0 Set oS ittech os glk vehicle's deaeiape ren cls cto sh ge rnarcenedt phamevesion Jtost 7 aC) Gloaue 40. be. ynocka of, The Qa SA Onl neh. « 1 @ compign engin. rte woe olone on pur vet ogerh 10) {0} Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor: 1) Are the auditors fotiowing Scope of assessment? Ans: Yes/No 2) ehavior of Auditor? Ans: Good / Satisfactory 3) Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: Yes/No 4)Hlave you understood Auditor's Inputs? Ans: Yes/No S)4mr wtarzvonon the assestment processof auditors? : (Cl contract Owner Details: (T5L employee): a) emaitig by Mobile number: Name & Signature: om Vendor's Details: endor code: b) Organization name: Heraitia 4) Mobile number: *1Name & Signature (0 Avsexsor4 vote os Home and signature 3p tue Qiworreren au N wom 12 foea 2. ame id PM cation. EAS.D nm THD) YUN TRY RUOUAD GAME] T Scanned with CamScannerCont Stas eating auseument hee dindings and feeahact foun Hee Redes a Liaee. Wier sceviee oy guhetack onggh ow te Ree ad i Knornnnrmanct polity + ine eject ve. & tecnph + Ee : 2. iQ fet glan te teen wet 19 OC pee fied” omente nerd ton Hoe ff Ba GL Mapemsa. plon do be act (QL Rape fi z at teen steeds glue Mons 5) das he nw t Ao ke wot v 5 “® ce wad OM et us poe OF plan ~~ “Trinny need AS be rg cn ciorenedo OEE 0) Clee | yefort to ee made Go wee at Q SA ondt + 1 leclle + i W X ; "@ Cenex Ache: wade aor sanpiad onpett @ pagpS — contee| pencaey Ss a= chartecd “agent * mG) Compotan needy ao be U8] Feedback by CO [TEL employee) and Vendor: dln es Gus Orr ack flex - Date the suditon Iottowing Scope of asenieeni? ante YE) No 21 Behavior of Autor? Ane! Geet f satistcrory 23) Frid vit conducted by the Auditor? ans, ¥et/Wo “djHiove you understood Auditors nputi? ee es TW 5) Any 1upzeston oa the assesment process sf aeetes? sos {) Contract Owner etal: [TSt ereployeel)= , mh @ faba ecto | seman ool ot nena? fetanied Hee nine, Ga VOZG5OEG saPTARee eet. Grow C1575 16) 2 {2} Wendar’s Details: nventereae DUBE Horaniftionname: (GBS | 22327 - dinis tyne reelt [4 yntobile number ewe Cente I sy@icartl ead! aoe Resneah be Tieden Ginetan [dmon Staten aa eit PELL 2021 ee uss be tector DG aStatiern jue Scanned with CamScannersew Cora Stor eating anvenment bey findings and tewdthack form a teipedien fe Consus ledion Ge orpleries nthe fs be Vyaahh. cofely Golly id ready 40. (Pacer grrasion “ 42) Aetion Plan le CR elo ackteve. Ack oh jeaFsv6 yon, Aedaveged 6 ‘ eb dified "@ contart Peosure, reads te we wardiorod Ge a} weesf SS ee dy the pbAgnueditra posnad In reoclo- a(Y “Clones. to, be ‘ Jevsasch WAT HN el add vert (5) tea me ond to o}, oll Me one vedion a mecdeby meas mectieg. fe Une. Uda” ' . ; ” 6) aw Tego gy equi () pats needls “h be calihacded « DP) Perak cid leove nencla VO oes inapatoc! agence (#) Compeign nee cy 10 be olora. Om fer . O 5 wo) 4) Reapers’ bility do be. dof 2 fo conduc Camera n {0} Feedback by CO (TSL employee) and Vendor: ) 1) Are the auditors following Scope of assesyment? Ao: Yes / Mo. 2) Behavior of Auditor? Ant: Good / Satisfactory 13) Freld visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans Yel / No 4) Have yor understood Auditor's Inputs? dag Yet/No '5) Any suggestion on the assessment process of auditors? ann pone (€) Conteact Owner Details: (TSt_ employee): b) Motile number: $2 ajtmanig fh Sor @ toby cteck CoH ce) Name & Senature’ A Tome e See: Bb ey [D) Vendor's Detalls: £ Scots BOB, b) Organization mime: (+ S*ENTER PRI LES Tea bined 6Q Bera Corn 1M A) Movile number: 244 6qe52F Atmatis Si s add i " | ese fo eh Name & Signature field arenss siiimeanasynnace *Gfinain Govewronrer [HS «IF (262.2. iment PMA tecaion Enginencing Sowieay [ey ass bud Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure tl CSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedbach form {a} Key Audit findings Powe cnnatny cet maemniyer 2g ey ceneg, ewe my pevient utewieaninas « F conve ueome Comer a en , Btn eruipe Vere Ween, YY Erte erek enue Of STE ve we miamiewre bee a aleihen T]carearem ae euere tet fecarrene were gubeeit @ EEN eT vinant) WY wernicm ccarcmrar ay nig poteene tee anh PAW EE Par retton . Pereasce Peon ueerres We) MePTY crac ghee Re FBenere ENTE 6H : ud Cerewsie palm 4 mEDE TER/umL Sy Ste move rym gin lo wo yene ce ae tae iD parle mame farce en oA WD Teer rare Te aL meatund (EMeceu) 18) Feedback by CO (TS employee) and Vendor: MLancy AUN ssenent? a} Are the auditors following Scope ofa Ans Yes/No bj Behawer of auditor? Ans Good / Sstsfactory [Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans yes fo diHave you understnad Auditor's inputs? ans #65) No ¢] Any supgestion on atcessme nt process af auditors? Ang Me. gurerinink wat CeereE {Cl Contract Owner [TSt employee Name & signature Wyucy Nealijeise Vesaan? hfe , Email id Mabilenumber POOGTI STL . “rail (0] Vendor code: |3014/ 108! Organization mame: Waya TPE CR LoMe PexehwETs LIONEL Fiat a bestced tdea id Sud iovPeom Mobile number: rey 4asad /reya/ eel LEY Name ofthe Berson AMASHNAEIE Crgguti tee J fishes , Assestor Name and signature, MB 5° cao keane, sean. (Mets) ——— Pal Time (ele We) Location = Hersam tate Kevan prints, anmeee ed ey}oa ec Pomsnen yiseal-ae Scanned with CamScannerAnnexure #1 GSM Star rating assessment key findings and feedback form (A) Key Audit findings: P Pre scene Smeqe, Wilding (mactice valid Cal} Aver blot 2D) obpeche @ heget hey pe Set four Fy (e2-21) but wider $s acloane tia cet few got + ? Com puing te be itHahed fer Copety lows ) 0 icra Leps hot cedlebie ab Gta vin ea Jo wet longi 5 Try Feedback Yims ty bc lewprow £ Sag vot veri sed : bizad on pre Fae db Lp J tewpleyen fe “JNTMT o ) Deployer of Wir Ger “Ga OT peepe. epteaye) Peet? (B) Feedback by CO (TSL emzloyee) and Vendor : a) Are the auditors following Scope of assessment? Ans: Ye& / No b) Behavior of Auditor? Ans: Good’ / Satisfactory ¢)Field visit conducted by the Auditor? Ans: és /no d)Have yoU understood Auditor's inputs? Pr Ans: Ye8/ No cay 7 CM ys - . Scanned with CamScanner AY Reece nt