Professional Documents
Culture Documents
“This text offers a compelling read and an excellent insight into the world of elite
university cricket and the ‘lifestyle’ it creates for its participants. All ethnogra-
phies are enshrined in time and location—after all, they reflect stories from a
specific time and place—but some present timeless accounts that cross the con-
textual barriers of sport and continue to resonate with the reader long after read-
ing. Whether you are a sociologist, social psychologist, coach or simply a cricket
lover, this book will intrigue and engage you. Throughout, Harry Bowles shines
a warm and empathetic light on the occasionally cold, closeted side of cricketing
life and captures the human side of his participants’ stories, while delivering a
frank dose of realism to those ‘chasing the dream’.”
—Dr Chris Wagstaff, Practitioner Psychologist and Principal Lecturer in
Performance Psychology at University of Portsmouth
Harry C. R. Bowles
University Cricket
and Emerging
Adulthood
“Days in the Dirt”
Harry C. R. Bowles
Cyncoed Campus
Cardiff Metropolitan University
Cardiff, UK
There are many types of studies undertaken by PhD students. Some are
prescriptive and formulaic. Others are more free-form where the student
sets out on a kind of academic expedition largely unaware of where their
intellectual journey will take them. These latter projects are not trying to
prove or disprove anything. Rather, they are personal explorations of the
unique dialectic between researcher and researched and the melee of
activity in between.
It would be fair to say that the period since the 1970s has witnessed the
emergence of a body of knowledge around the social and cultural aspects
of sport whereby qualitative research methods and methodologies have
become a staple in the field. Yet relatively few social researchers have
managed to breach the institutional bounds of elite sport and fewer still
have carried out in-depth qualitative work within cricketing contexts. For
all the modern-day media coverage that it commands, elite sport remains
a heavily guarded affair, particularly in terms of who and what gains
access to its inner sanctums. The truth is, ethnographies of sport are hard
to find—and good ones are even harder. Here we are in luck.
In July 2014 I had the privilege of examining Harry Bowles’ PhD the-
sis—upon which this book is based. I knew from the moment that I
started to read Harry’s work that I was going to find out as much about
him as I was about his research. One of the hallmarks of ethnographic
craft is its deployment of empathy and sensitivity and, as you are about
v
vi Foreword
to discover, this work is replete with both. Seldom have I enjoyed reading
a PhD so much. Rarely have I met a beginning scholar with such an
innate sense of how to make the familiar strange. Indeed, one of the
things that impresses me the most about Harry’s work is his ability to tell
an accessible and engaging story whilst at the same time maintaining the
level of academic rigour expected within the ethnographic tradition.
For anyone even remotely involved with or interested in the inner
workings of elite sport this book is essential reading. It tells of cricket’s
insularity, its folklore, its characters. In so doing, it serves to contextualize
the investigative climate within which the underpinning research was
carried out whilst providing a highly reflexive account of the ethno-
graphic experience itself. It charts the complexities of data collection
(long days in the field, relentless note taking, ‘hanging around’ as the
awkward interloper), the tensions and anxieties of personal interaction,
the significance of researcher integrity. This is ‘real world’ research at its
best.
In turn, of course, we are treated to the detailed nuances of elite sport-
ing life and, more specifically, the experiences of trainee professional
cricketers. Presenting a case-study analysis of one elite cricket academy,
the work utilizes those methods of sociological enquiry traditionally asso-
ciated with ethnography (i.e. participant observation, semi-structured
interviews, and documentary analysis) in order to explore the day-to-day
lives of the young people concerned. The study depicts the way in which
academy recruits are socialized into the culture of professional cricket and
how their career expectations and aspirations are subsequently shaped by
the detailed complexities of institutional experience. At the same time,
the study provides insight into the personal and social lives of trainees.
Notably issues of self and identity emerge in terms of individual experi-
ence and interpretation. Furthermore, the influence of academy officials
is also considered in relation to the pressures, pitfalls and constraints of
trainee development.
What all of this illustrates is that sport does not exist in a social vac-
uum. On the contrary, it is shaped and formed amidst the richness of
broader social life, evolving and developing in accordance with the insti-
tutional practices and popular cultural messages that surround us. In this
sense, this book not only allows readers to reflect upon the ways in which
Foreword
vii
ix
x Preface: An Insider to the Context
There are of course always two sides to every story and the story that I
have chosen to tell is centred around one aspect of the players’ experi-
ences—namely the questions of self that were encountered by a group of
young men on their shared transitional journey towards professional
cricket and adult identity commitments. The research provides a compre-
hensive account of a process of identity exploration through which this
group of predominantly white British, middle-class and able-bodied
student-cricketers actively constructed and made sense of their lives. The
analysis takes into account the particular characteristics of a collegiate-
sport context that encouraged a process of self-questioning that featured
within the experiences of its student-athlete population, from the per-
spective of a white British, middle-class and able-bodied researcher in his
early to mid-twenties.
At the centre of this book, lies the notion of ‘self ’ and ‘identity’; two
closely related concepts which are often used in conjunction or inter-
changeably. Questions about the nature and importance of self and iden-
tity have captivated social scientists for many centuries and the literature
is littered with theoretical language pertaining to constructs of mind and
body. For simplicity, and to frame the empirical and interpretive elements
of the research, throughout this book, the term identity is used to refer to
a set of meaningful definitions ascribed to self, including a hierarchy of
goals, values and priorities, and conceptions of one’s potential (Baumeister
and Mauraven 1996). Self, on the other hand, is used in reference of a
more ‘global, multirole, core conception of the real person’ (Adler and
Alder 1991, p. 28). Both concepts are central to the research problem
that emerged during fieldwork of how a group of young men developed
the self and situational knowledge upon which to base prospective iden-
tity decisions.
Epistemologically, the research is rooted in what Willis (1978,
pp. 196–197) describes as the ‘self-reflexive technique’ which refers to the
ability of the participant-observer to experience empathy and analyse
‘how his [sic] own experience is minutely locked into another’s’. The
interpretative method I used involved me being able to recognise and
relate to some of the personal and shared anxieties expressed by the
researched group, and connecting them to the context in which they were
in and a wider social and historical frame of reference. Therefore, alongside
Preface: An Insider to the Context
xiii
References
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards and Blackboards: College Athletes and
Role Engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Baumeister, R. F., & Muraven, M. (1996). Identity as adaptation to social, cul-
tural and historical context. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 405–416.
Dandelion, B. P. (1997). Insider dealing: researching your own private world. In
A. Tomlinson & S. Fleming (Eds.), Ethics, Sport and Leisure: Crises and
Critiques (pp. 223–244). Oxford: Meyer & Meyer.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Pryce, K. (1986). Endless Pressure: A Study of West Indian Life-Styles in Bristol.
Bristol: Bristol Classic Press.
Willis, P. (1978). Profane Culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Young, K., & Atkinson, M. (2012). Introduction: The practice of qualitative
research and thinking qualitatively. In K. Young & M. Atkinson (Eds.),
Qualitative Research on Sport and Physical Culture. Bingley: Emerald.
Acknowledgments
xv
Contents
Epilogue 203
References 219
Index 229
xvii
List of Abbreviations
xix
List of Figures
Fig. 1.1 Adapted version of ECB strategic plan for cricket 2006–
2010: player pathway and programmes 7
Fig. 1.2 England cricket pathway—boys (2014) 8
Fig. 1.3 Indoor Cricket Centre interior layout (not to scale) 13
Fig. 1.4 Indoor Cricket Centre located in plan view (not to scale) 13
Image 1.1 Hanging out on the player’s balcony: Lord’s 17
Image 1.2 Caught in the act: the art of eavesdropping 17
Image 1.3 Writing fieldnotes the ‘old fashioned’ way: Wormsley
Estate Cricket Ground 18
Image 1.4 A lap of the boundary: a way of getting to know
individuals more personally 19
Image 1.5 Establishing a role: helping Josh with his warm up 20
Image 1.6 Celebrating the end of the 2011 university season 21
Image 3.1 Changing room entertainment: a spot of tennis to
pass the time 86
Image 3.2 No play due to rain. The Parks: Oxford 94
Image 3.3 Feeling captive: view from my hotel room:
Derbyshire CCC 106
xxi
1
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt
The Indoor Cricket Centre is a white, metal clad building on the grounds
of a county and international cricket stadium. This purpose-built, box-
like structure, with its elevated roof and synthetic floor, plays host to
cricketers of all age groups servicing the local community and elite athlete
populations. Cricketers as young as 8 years old can learn to play here with
access to all the facilities that international cricket stars use to fine-tune
their skills. It was inside this lofty space, amid bats, pads and sweaty kit,
that my association with a group of university cricketers began, and the
observational fieldwork upon which this book is based started in
earnest.
Armed with an A5 Black ‘n’ Red notebook, and rubber tipped pencil, I
watched from a respectful distance; my vision obscured by netting that
hung from the ceiling separating me from twenty or so young men going
through their paces. Caught up in my own self-consciousness, ears filled by
the sound of cricket balls hitting their targets, I stood still, afraid to disturb
the natural order of things, wondering what the hell I should be doing.
If truth be told, I was little prepared. I had read the handbooks and ‘how-
to texts’ and understood some of the principles, but the process of ethnog-
raphy was not a technical procedure that I could simply roll out. The sights
and sounds of cricketers practising in the nets was a scene with which I was
familiar. As an insider to the context, I was not put off by the particularities
of the cricketing rituals taking place in front of me. I was, however, unsure
of my purpose and whether my investigations would get off the ground—
familiar territory for those who have attempted this type of research. So, I
picked up a bat that lay on the ground next to me and started to shadow a
few shots, comforting myself with each swing of the blade.1
It was January 2011 and preparations for the season were well underway. By
the end of March I would be taken further out of my comfort zone as gymna-
siums and sports halls were replaced with pavilions, dining tables and motor-
way service stations. It would take a while for players to let me into their lives
and for me to develop the confidence to pry. But cricketers spend a lot of time
together helping to spark relationships where there once were none. In sixty
cricket-related days that would follow the players’ last indoor practice, I would
spend twenty-two nights away with them, staying in ten different hotels and
travel more than four thousand miles up and down the country. Like getting
to know the players, it would take time for me to piece together the meaning
of their everyday experiences, and draw a connection between their lives and
the cricketing environment of which they were a part. What, for example,
could be learned from watching a game of first-class cricket in a thirteen thou-
sand seat stadium with no one in it? Or by witnessing the reactions of eleven
young cricketers come off the field at the close of play with their county oppo-
nents 447 for 1,2 and groan at the prospect of spending another “day in the
dirt.” This is, after all, what they wanted to do, right?
1
Parlance for cricket bat.
2
The score and situation of the match expressed in runs scored (by the side batting) and wickets
taken (by the side bowling).
3
In total, there are eighteen professional county cricket teams in England and Wales who compete
against each other domestically in a two-tier, ‘first-class’ competition, The County Championship.
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 3
Between October 2010 and June 2013 when the majority of this research
was conducted, each centre received a financial stipend from the Marylebone
4
Data on history of the Varsity Match retrieved from: http://cricketarchive.com/.
5
For more information on the origins of the university centres of cricket excellence go to:
https://www.ecb.co.uk/news/domestic/mcc-universities.
4 H. C. R. Bowles
Cricket Club (MCC),6 who took over the sponsorship of university cricket
from the ECB in 2005, of £82,400 per annum.7
The model upon which the university centres of cricketing excellence
(UCCEs) were based pre-dates the existence of the ECB as the national
governing body for cricket in England and Wales. The idea behind ‘the
scheme’ came from the former England, Lancashire and Durham open-
ing batsman Graeme Fowler who received the support of the Test and
County Cricket Board (TCCB), and a Prime Minister with a soft spot for
cricket, to start the first centre of excellence at Durham University in
September 1996. According to Fowler (2016, p. 196), the aim was pure
and simple. The centre of excellence at Durham was about giving young
players the chance to “finish their education and progress their game into
first-class cricket and beyond”. The priorities, he describes, were “educa-
tion first, cricket second, social third” in an environment built not just on
bricks and mortar, but on an “attitude” of excellence, and thus the centre
at Durham set itself apart from traditional university sport in its organ-
isation and focus. As the former Middlesex batsman and England cap-
tain, Andrew Strauss, recollects in his autobiography (2013, p. 31),
“overnight, the Durham University CC had gone from a ramshackle
organisation of talented students … to a highly professional set-up.”
While Oxford and Cambridge University had a long history of produc-
ing first-class cricketers and future England captains, the centre at
Durham was a forerunner to the start of a new high-performance sport
culture that was set to emerge amid a fast expanding HE sector.
A year after the centre of excellence at Durham University began, the
TCCB was superseded by the ECB which set about restructuring the gover-
nance of cricket in England and Wales, and resurrecting the success of a
national team in decline. In this context, the formalisation and regional
development of an organised system of elite university cricket can be read as
part of the ECB positioning itself as the central authority and governing body
for the UK’s national summer sport. It did so against a political backdrop that
6
Founded in 1787, the MCC is the largest private members cricket club in the world who sponsor
a number of cricketing initiatives aimed at developing the game both nationally and internation-
ally. Representing part of the cricketing establishment historically, the MCC remain involved in the
governance of the game as guardian of the Laws and ‘Spirit of Cricket.’
7
See also https://www.lords.org/mcc/youth-cricket/mcc-universities/centres-of-excellence/.
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 5
had seen a significant shift in government policy and funding for sport. In
1995, as Fowler was beginning to canvass support for his idea of a university-
based cricket academy, the then Conservative Government published a White
Paper, Sport: Raising the Game (Department of National Heritage 1995).
The policy statement signalled a move away from central government sup-
port for mass participation in favour of developing elite sport, and the role
HE institutions could have in fostering elite athletes (Green 2004).
Within the Conservative’s new policy framework, the allocation of
funding to national governing bodies (NGBs) would become conditional
on the explicit support of government objectives, forcing NGBs to (re)
consider their investment in performance sport (Houlihan 1997).
According to Green (2004), the mid 1990s can be viewed as a watershed
that would go on to shape the direction of sport policy into the t wenty-first
century. Indeed, much of the rhetoric that features in Sport: Raising the
Game later featured in the Labour government’s strategy for sport, A
Sporting Future for All (Department for Culture, Media and Sport 2000).
Under Labour, funding to NGBs became directly linked to performance
targets and NGBs were required to produce national talent performance
plans identifying pathways from grassroots to international level (Green
2004). Furthermore, HE continued to be viewed as a site in which gifted
sportspeople could be nurtured, with attention placed on ensuring “con-
tinuity and progression” between the school sector and HE to prevent
talent being lost at this key transition point (Department of Culture,
Media and Sport 2000, p. 17)
Another central theme to the political discourse at the start of the ECB’s
reign in 1997, and the initiation of the UCCEs in 2000, was an emphasis
on widening participation to HE and encouraging more young people to
go to university as a means of reaching their socio-economic potential
(Leatherwood and O’Connell 2003). With the political stars aligned, the
ECB set about harnessing a helpful policy landscape to attract universities
to support the model of cricket and education successfully piloted at
Durham. To deliver the scheme, the ECB established a working group
consisting of several former professional cricketers with university back-
grounds who put the scheme out to tender and began the process of
6 H. C. R. Bowles
As I recall there was certainly some discussion and debate around the fact
that the government of the time was really encouraging young people to go
to university. And I think there was a statistic being bandied around that
they wanted 50% of the population to go … and if that was the case then
a lot of cricketers would go down that route. So that was a part driver to it
I’m sure … [Another] key driver was that we had a number of players who
were going to university, who were either on first-class staffs or had played
a bit of first-class cricket, who were obviously talented cricketers and there
was a concern that their cricket development would drop-off.
The potential benefits of the UCCE scheme for cricket are clear and well
founded: It is estimated that by 2005 nearly half of 18 year olds [in the
UK] will seek to enter higher education (many of England’s current Under
17 squads … wish to go to university). With this fact in mind, it is impera-
tive that cricketers with an inclination to go on to higher education are
given the facilities to develop their talent whilst completing their educa-
tion. ECB has a very real responsibility to look after the best interests of
existing and future cricketers. The scheme gives talented younger cricketers
… the best of both worlds—an excellent cricketing education to enable
them to fulfil their cricketing ambitions and greater security through
improved career opportunities outside of the game.
In one sense, the ECB understood its responsibility and duty of care towards
its young athletes. In another, it saw the development of the university centres
8
For more information on types of youth sports see European Commission DG Education and
Culture’s final report on the Education of Young Sports Persons (2004).
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 7
England
England Development Squad
National Academy
First-Class Counties England Programme
England
U15/17/19 Minor Counties County Programme
Fig. 1.1 Adapted version of ECB strategic plan for cricket 2006–2010: player
pathway and programmes
8 H. C. R. Bowles
centres of excellence have produced around one fifth of the English quali-
fied players in the county system. Although a well-trodden route into pro-
fessional cricket, the university system is no longer an official part of the
ECB’s restructured Cricket Pathway (see Fig. 1.2). When the MCC cut
the funding to each centre to £46,000 per year in 2016, the ECB failed to
make up the financial shortfall arousing suspicion that the long-term
future of the scheme—as it was originally conceived—is under threat.
Against this uncertain backdrop, the Cambridge graduate and former
England captain, Michael Atherton (2017), provided a timely reminder of
the value of the university centres for cricket excellence. Writing in The Times,
he describes university cricket as an essential “buffer between the amateur
and professional game” and an important delay in a young player’s transition
into the all-encompassing realities of professional sport. Recognising the
holistic benefits of the scheme, Atherton (2017) highlights:
England
-3 22
England Performance
Prog. / Lions
-6 19
-10 U16
-13 U13
U8
9
For a journalistic account of what cricketers get up to at the end of their careers, see Felix White
(May, 2017) on ‘life after cricket’ in issue 152 of All Out Cricket Magazine.
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 11
10
‘Minor’ county cricket differs from ‘major’ county cricket primarily for its ‘minor’, amateur status
and represents an organizationally distinct division of the game in England and Wales.
12 H. C. R. Bowles
Table 1.1 List of university players who agreed to take part in the study. Information
recorded at the time of consent
Year of
Participant Age Degree course study Role Contract
Josh 19 Social Policy 1st Wicketkeeper/ No
batter
Lewis 19 Philosophy 1st Batter Yes
Patrick 20 Accountancy 1st Batter Yes
Connor 19 Sport Coaching 1st Batter Yes
Simon 18 Business 1st Bowler No
Alan 21 Sports Massage 3rd Bowler No
John 19 Business 1st Batter Yes
Greg 19 Sport and PE 1st Batter No
James 18 Business 1st Bowler No
Lee 23 Management 4th Wicketkeeper/ No
batter
George 19 Sports Coaching 2nd Bowler Yes
Tim 21 Sport Management 2nd Batter/ No
all-rounder
Ben 19 Sport Coaching 2nd Bowler/ Yes
all-rounder
Ryan 20 Sport Science 2nd Wicketkeeper/ No
batter
David 20 Sports Coaching 3rd Batter No
Mark 21 Maths 3rd Bowler No
Luke 20 Sport Science 2nd Bowler No
Tom 21 Design 3rd Bowler No
Martin 18 Ancient History 1st Batter No
Michael 18 Sport and PE 1st Batter No
Steve 20 Sport Management 2nd Batter/ No
all-rounder
Alex 19 Sports Coaching 2nd Batter No
Andy 19 Sport Management 1st Batter No
Paul 21 Business and 3rd Bowler No
Management
Scott 18 Sports Coaching 1st Bowler Yes
Chris 24 Sport and PE 1st Bowler No
Outer wall
Access to
Seating area playing area
Net lane 1
2 Weights gym
Office
Fixed perimeter netting
area/surface
surface
25m playing
playing 4
Retractable lane netting
UniturfUniturf
Changing
machines
Vending
6
rooms and
showers
36m 7
Access Road
Security gates
(Player/staff access)
Fig. 1.4 Indoor Cricket Centre located in plan view (not to scale)
14 H. C. R. Bowles
11
‘Summer contracts’, otherwise known as ‘development contracts’ are a cost-effective way that
county teams retain young players and bolster their professional playing squads. They are often
short—one or two seasons in length—comprising of two to three months of the playing season
only and are easily extended in order to monitor how young talent unfolds.
12
Shortest and most explosive format of the game for players and spectators alike with games lasting
approximately three hours in length.
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 15
research does not necessarily begin with a set of well-formulated aims and
research questions. Instead the researcher often goes in with a set of perspec-
tives that change through his or her engagement with real people in real
settings (Corrigan 1979). As Becker (1958, p. 653) points out:
of their lives unless invited (see Image 1.6). As time went on, invitations
became more frequent and I mixed with members of the squad socially
where I felt it appropriate. I even ran errands for them like offering a lift
to the station, or proof-reading pieces of coursework.13
In addition to the extended amount of time I spent immersed in the
cricketing routines of the group, data collection was performed in proximity
to the activities witnessed in a variety of places and different circumstances,
from sitting in traffic on the motorway to standing on the home team bal-
cony at Lord’s (see Image 1.1 and 1.2). Whilst observing, I sought to under-
stand what was shared by the group and differentiate it from individual
feelings or experiences. My familiarity with cricketing parlance helped in
this regard. It also helped to breakdown communication barriers and avert
inevitable changing room faux pas that could have jeopardised my position
from the start. It would take longer, though, to become close with individu-
als and build trust among the collective party so essential to the longevity of
the research, and the richness of my fieldwork experiences (Fleming 1995).14
To this end, I approached the task of relationship building in the ‘spirit of
friendship’ (Fleming 2013, p. 39) which I used as an ethical and method-
ological principle to inform my research practice.
Alongside all the hanging around, I relied heavily on the ‘discipline of
daily writing’ (Hammersely and Atkinson 2007, p. 144) as a way of record-
ing details of major conversations and observations (see Image 1.3). The
laborious task of putting ‘pen to paper’ was important for it helped to mark
a passing moment so that I could revisit it at a later date. The craft of con-
temporaneous note taking was a skill I become proficient at and found a
way to mask, not to deceive people, but to normalise the process. To make
note taking more practical and less visible, I used an iPhone to capture
information as close to an event as possible (e.g. an interesting discussion
between two or more people), and blend it in with the modern, everyday
practice of being on one’s phone. My notes contained a combination of
substantive descriptions, words, phrases and ‘fringe-thoughts’ (Mills 1959,
13
On the varying degrees of ethnographic engagement, Sugden and Tomlinson (1999, p. 387) dis-
tinguished between prolonged forms of ‘depth immersion’ that became characteristic of this research,
and more fleeting forms of ‘ethnographic visiting’ which my earliest research encounters reflected.
14
In order to reduce social distance and enhance field relations, I adopted a similar strategy to
Fleming (1995, p. 58) who decided to adopt a ‘least authoritative’ role as a ‘sort-of P.E. teacher’ in
his school-based study on the leisure lifestyles of South Asian youths (see also Fleming 1997).
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 17
Image 1.3 Writing fieldnotes the ‘old fashioned’ way: Wormsley Estate
Cricket Ground
p. 196) that became starting points for salient themes within the data. After
a morning of lifting weights in the gym with the squad, or back at the team
hotel after a day’s play, I would find a space to reflect and add meat to a
skeleton of prompts and cues recorded in close to chronological order. Data
captured and expanded in this way is of course limited by the strength of
my recollection and power of expression, but I am confident that if not
accurate ‘word-for-word’ it is accurate in ‘tone’ (Pryce 1986, p. 299).
Observational data were supplemented by information gathered by
other traditional ethnographic techniques such as informal, and often
impromptu, field-based conversations recorded on a digital Dictaphone,
and the collection of documents and other artefacts (e.g. photographs,
newspaper articles, paperwork and other forms of correspondence) perti-
nent to the research. When it came to talking to people, like Atkinson
(2003, p. 78), I adopted a strategy that would ‘elicit free-ranging and highly
descriptive responses from individuals about their experiences’ which
involved a significant degree of self-disclosure by both researcher and par-
ticipant. One-to-one or small group conversations were a chance to delve
into the personal narratives couched within the collective experience of
playing cricket. But this presented me with the methodological problem of
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 19
how to extract individuals away from the group in a manner that did not
draw attention to what I was doing or undermine team dynamics. The
answer was not to extract individuals at all, but to wait and allow the natu-
ral rhythm and routines of cricket to drive the process—like taking a “lap”
around the boundary, when invited, as cricketers often do during periods
of inactivity created by the game (see Image 1.4). Primed with ideas rather
than questions, I allowed conversations of this kind to follow a natural
course, with some developing into more purposeful and systematic discus-
sions with individuals who became key informants (Parker 1998).
The principles and practices of ethnographic fieldwork, however, are
not to be confused with a simple ‘look, listen and learn procedure’ (Van
Maanen 1995, p. 2), and I am mindful not to depict them as so. According
to Fine (1993), ethnographers create illusions about themselves, their
technical skill and the sensitivity of their approach. This is all part of a
complex participant-observer-research equation that is built into the final
product, that has been written about and reflected upon at length else-
where (e.g. Van Maanen 1988; Hammersley 1992; Brewer 1994; Van
Maanen 2011). Suffice it to say ethnographers are not passive bystanders
in the research process, but flawed and active agents in the production of
Image 1.4 A lap of the boundary: a way of getting to know individuals more
personally
20 H. C. R. Bowles
15
On the topic of the researcher’s ‘appearance’, Fetterman (1989, p. 56) emphasises the value of
honesty when it comes to researchers attempting to adapt their behaviours and manage their image
to fit their research surroundings. In his opinion, being ‘natural is more effective than any perfor-
mance’ as even the most accomplished actor is bound to ‘slip up’ at some stage during the research.
That said, the ‘ethnographic self ’ is still to be managed in strategic ways to facilitate the process of
researching (Hammersely and Atkinson 2007), making ‘identity work’ a pervasive feature of the
ethnographic enterprise (Coffey 1999).
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 21
play it, and what impact society might have on the way a generation of
cricketers think about and approach the game (James 1963). On cricket
and the temperament of cricketers, Kavanagh (1981, p. 113) wrote:
It’s the middle of the season. It’s hot, and the wicket is flat. Your team is in
the field and the opposition are a decent batting side, so you slap the sun
cream on and go out with the realisation you’re going to be standing in the
field for the rest of the day. [At times like this] you have got to keep remind-
ing yourself that this is it … it’s just part of the game and somehow you
have got to find some pleasure in doing it. But it’s tough—it’s a constant
battle to keep motivating yourself on days like this. On the field, there’s a
bit of banter to start, but that soon wears off, and slowly you get that feel-
ing … You don’t give up, but you certainly feel like it whilst you think
about all the things you’d rather be doing. And you know you shouldn’t
think like that, but you just can’t help it … From 11 o’clock you are just
counting down the minutes to lunch, and then to tea, just wilting as the
day goes on. You’ve done all the practice, all the weights and all the fitness,
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 23
but it’s a mental thing because nothing prepares you for days like this …
Then you finally come off at the close of play and I mean you can literally
smell the dirt. It’s just that feeling and that smell of sweat. You look around
and everyone is burnt. Your skin is red and glowing. Your whites are filthy.
Your socks are soaked. The day’s been long. You’re tired, you feel beaten,
and as you sit there moaning about it to your teammates it starts to sink in
that you’re in the field again tomorrow [for another day in the dirt] … It’s
even tougher though when you’re staying away in a hotel on the side of a
motorway. That’s when you really start to question whether you want to do
this at all?
learn to accept rather than question. Indeed, it has become a truism that
elite athlete populations, including those in higher education, are at risk of
identity-foreclosure due to the culture of professional sport, wider social
expectations and a lack of formative identity-exploration leading to feelings
of loss and dilemma when their careers come to end (Sparkes 1998; Douglas
and Carless 2009).
The sociological nature of previous ethnographic research on the expe-
riences of youth athletes has meant little consideration has been given to
the psychosocial characteristics of these young people at a particular stage
of their life-course—characteristics that are likely to influence the nature
of the interactions young sportspeople have with their sporting environ-
ments. Against this empirical backdrop, the criticality players displayed
towards professional cricket as an occupation and identity commitment
stood out as a focal point to the research, particularly when read in con-
text of their wider developmental transitions as young people.
From a theoretical point of view, even within restrictive occupational
cultures like those found in professional sport, the self is not passive or
immune to the conditions of late modernity that have caused questions of
identity to become a prevalent feature of people’s day-to-day lives (Giddens
1991). Scholars from the disciplines of sociology and psychology have
argued that dramatic social and cultural change has resulted in a loosening
of traditional social structures (e.g. class, gender roles etc.) and geographical
ties, altering individuals’ relationship with the contexts in which they lead
their lives (Baumeister 1986, 1987). Where identity is concerned, the flex-
ibility of modern Western societies provides people with the autonomy to
make decisions about who they are and where they see themselves in the
future. Whilst these actual or perceived freedoms are liberating in one
sense, individuals are also saddled with the burden of self-definition in soci-
eties where identity is increasingly seen as a matter of personal choice (Beck
1992). With choice comes the complication and increased pressure to
choose the right path and establish an identity that provides meaning,
direction and emotional prosperity over the life-course. Although many
have claimed that the personal freedoms offered by late modernity have
been exaggerated in the context of youth transitions (e.g. Hodkinson and
Sparkes 1997; Roberts 1997; Furlong et al. 2006; Bynner 2005), it is widely
accepted that social structures that once anchored people’s perceptions of
26 H. C. R. Bowles
Work is one of the primary means by which adults find their identity and
form their character. Simply put: where we work, how we work, what we do
at work and the general ethos and culture of the workplace indelibly mark
us for life.
Regardless of its sort, work provides people with access to goods and ser-
vices and a way of achieving status and a certain lifestyle (Gini 1998). It
also provides a means of social comparison used to integrate with or dif-
ferentiate self from others (Law et al. 2002), with self-definition often
expressed through the narration of career stories (Meijers and Lengelle
2012). Given work absorbs much of people’s physical and mental resources
(Thomas 1999) it requires a level of personal commitment and self-sacri-
fice that acts as a central pillar for identity-formation into adulthood and
a means of constructing a path through life (Marcia, 1980, 2002).
In the face of having to make a series of enduring life-choices, Erikson
(1968) theorised adolescence and early adulthood as a fraught and often
conflicted period during which the young may experience a sense of con-
fusion as they strive to get a foot on the career ladder and find resolutions
to the basic questions of their identity. Erikson is an example of one of the
classic identity theorists (e.g. Cooley 1902; Mead 1934) who ruminated
on the extent to which identity is formed as an individual, psychological
Introduction: A Day in the Dirt 27
Erikson’s theory on identity (1958, 1968, 1980) reflects some of the the-
oretical propositions offered by Mead (1934) who argues self-development
to be dependent on interaction with other people. According to Mead,
‘the self ’ is not initially there at birth. To exist, it is reliant on social con-
text as an ‘object’ that arises out of social experience (Mead 1934, p. 247)
making the very nature of identity-formation a process that incorporates
a reflexive dialogue between individual and his or her social surroundings
(Adams and Marshall 1996; Adams 2003).
The ‘identity-consciousness’ to which Erikson (1968) refers arises out
of a complex mix of social interactions and subjective experiences that
throw early childhood identifications and parental expectations into
doubt. Identity-formation in adolescence is often accompanied by a sense
of confusion as the young person tries to cultivate a new sense of inner
continuity around new social roles, interests and competencies (Kroger
2004, 2005), and other criteria free from parental and family influence
(Baumeister 1986).
28 H. C. R. Bowles
Plate 17.
MECHANICK EXERCISES:
Or, the Doctrine of
Handy-works.
Applied to the ART of
Mold-Making, Sinking the Matrices,
Casting and Dressing of
Printing-Letters.
a The Carriage.
b The Body.
c The Male-Gage.
d e The Mouth-Piece.
f i The Register.
g The Female-Gage.
h The Hag.
a a a a The Bottom-Plate.
b b b The Wood the Bottom-Plate lies on.
c c e The Mouth.
d d The Throat.
e d d The Pallat.
f The Nick.
g g The Stool.
h h g The Spring or Bow.
I have here given you only the Names of the parts of the Mold,
because at present I purpose no other Use of it, than what relates to
the sinking the Punches into the Matrices: And when I come to the
casting of Letters, You will find the Use and Necessity of all these
Parts.
¶. 2. Of the Bottom-Plate.
¶. 3. Of the Carriage.
¶. 4. Of the Body.
Upon the Carriage is fitted the Body, as at b. This Body is also made
of Iron, and is half the length of the Carriage, and the exact breadth
of the Carriage; but its thickness is alterable, and particularly made
for every intended Body.
About the middle of this Body is made a square Hole, about a Great-
Primmer, or Double-Pica square; and directly under it is made
through the Carriage such another Hole exactly of the same size.
¶. 5. Of the Male-Gage.
Through these two Holes, viz. That in the Body, and that in the
Carriage, is fitted a square Iron Shank with a Male-Screw on one
End, and on the other End an Head turning square from the square
Shanck to the farther end of the Body, as is described at c; but is
more particularly described apart at B in the same Plate, where B
may be called the Male-Gage: For I know no distinct Name that
Founders have for it, and do therefore coyn this:
c c e The Mouth.
d The Palate.
c c e d The Jaws.
d d The Throat.
¶. 7. Of the Register.
C a a b c d e The Register.
a a The Sholders.
b c The Neck.
d The Cheek returning square from the Plate of the
Register, and is about an English thick.
e The Screw Hole.
¶. 8. Of the Nick.
In the upper half of the Mold, at about a Pica distance from the
Throat, is fitted into the under-side of the Body the Nick: It is made of
a piece of Wyer filed flat a little more than half away. This Nick is
bigger or less, as the Body the Mold is made for is bigger or less; but
its length is about two m’s. It is with round Sculptors let exactly into
the under-side of the Body.
In the under half of the Mold, is made at the same distance from the
Throat, on the upper-side of the Body, a round Groove, just fit to
receive the Nick in the upper half.
These are Iron Wyers about a Long-Primmer thick: Their Shape you
may see in the Figure: They are so fastned into the Wood of the
Mold, that they may not hinder the Ladle hitting the Mouth. Their
Office is to pick and draw with their Points the Break and Letter out
of the Mold when they may chance to stick.