Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org/joc Note
ABSTRACT: The ring opening of aziridines by pendant sulfamates is a viable strategy for the rapid preparation of vicinal diamines.
Our reaction is compatible with both disubstituted cis- and trans-aziridines; unsubstituted, N-alkyl, and N-aryl sulfamates engage
effectively. In all cases examined, the cyclization reaction is perfectly regioselective and stereospecific. Once activated, the product
oxathiazinane heterocycles can be ring opened with a diverse range of nucleophiles.
we had to develop robust protocols for starting material Scheme 3. Structure−Reactivity Relationship with Various
preparation (Scheme 2). While epoxy-sulfamates can be readily Sulfamate Esters
a
Reaction conditions: Bu4NOH·30H2O) (1 equiv)/1:1 CF3−
toluene:H2O/23 °C, 16 h. bIn parentheses: substrate number,
a
product number.
In parentheses: substrate number, product number.
Scheme 6. Cyclization Scales Well with Both cis- and trans-
were pleased that nosylated aziridines were fully compatible Aziridine Sulfamate Substrates
with our optimized protocol. There was no productive reaction
with N-phthalimido-aziridine substrate 24; only decomposition
of starting material was observed (Scheme 4, entry 7). We
hypothesize that the known instability of phthalimide
protecting groups in a basic milieu underlies this.
With all substrates tested (Scheme 5), the cyclization was
perfectly regioselective and stereospecific. In all cases, the
pendant sulfamate auxiliary cleaved the aziridine with 6-exo-
selectivity to give 6-membered oxathiazinane heterocycles
bearing vicinal diamines. trans-Aziridine sulfamate starting
materials gave products with an erythro configuration;
conversely, cis-aziridine sulfamates gave products with a threo
configuration. With our optimized protocol, cis, trans, and
terminal aziridine sulfamates were competent cyclization
substrates but, in some instances, with differing reactivity. example, stirring 6 with NaN3 at room temperature formed
For example, cis-aziridine N-cyclohexyl sulfamate 11 (Scheme azide 47, which is a triamine surrogate (Scheme 7A). When 2
3) gave no reaction, even with extended reaction times; in was reacted with triphosgene and NEt3 at 0 °C, bicyclic
sharp contrast, trans-aziridine N-cyclohexyl sulfamate 27 oxathiazinane urea 48 formed in good yield (Scheme 7B). The
cyclized efficiently (Scheme 5, entry 1). Crystal structures of reactions conditions had to be carefully controlled; when the
products 26 (CCDC 2277022) and 28 (CCDC 2277021) reaction was warmed to room temperature, chloride 49 was the
allowed for unambiguous determination of the relative exclusive product. Crystal structures of 48 (CCDC 2277025)
stereochemistry. The identities of other products were assigned and 49 (CCDC 2277024) have allowed us to confirm the
by analogy. Multifold increases in scale were tolerated without identity and relative stereochemistry. Similar reactions with 26
erosion of yield or selectivity (Scheme 6). allowed for formation of products 50 (CCDC 2279638) and
The oxathiazinane products could be ring opened with a 51, which are epimers of 48 and 49 (Scheme 7B). Bicyclic
variety of nucleophiles, allowing for the rapid transformation of oxathiazinane ureas 48 and 50 could be ring opened with a
these heterocycles into value-added products (Scheme 7). For diverse array of nucleophiles, allowing for the facile
15991 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
15992 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
General Procedure C: Sulfamoylation Using N-Methylsulfamoyl organic layer was collected, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated
Chloride. under reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified by
chromatography on silica gel (gradient of 5−30% EtOAc/hexanes) to
give 7 as a colorless oil (0.228 g, 0.51 mmol, 27% yield).
Procedure F: Sulfamoylation Using Phenyl-Sulfamoyl Chloride.
15993 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
Compound 2. Compound 5.
Synthesized using General Procedure G on a 0.2 mmol scale. Purified Procedure for synthesis and purification provided in Procedure D.
1
using a gradient of 30−60% EtOAc in hexane on silica gel; single H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.85−7.76 (m, 2H), 7.38−7.29 (m,
diastereomer (white solid, 0.057 g, 0.164 mmol, 82% yield). 2H), 7.25−7.17 (m, 2H), 6.93−6.84 (m, 2H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 4.26−
1 4.09 (m, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.88 (ddd, J = 8.8, 7.3, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.68
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.34−
7.29 (m, 2H), 5.14 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.75−4.71 (m, 1H), 4.71− (ddd, J = 8.4, 7.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.00 (dddd, J = 14.6, 8.5,
4.65 (m, 1H), 4.58 (ddd, J = 11.4, 5.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (ddt, J = 6.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 1.67 (ddt, J = 14.2, 8.8, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.48 (dqd, J =
12.1, 10.9, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.27−3.16 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.20 (dtd, J 14.9, 7.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.34−1.25 (m, 1H), 0.80 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13
= 14.9, 12.8, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 1.64 (dq, J = 14.7, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.53 (dt, J = C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.1, 144.9, 134.7, 129.9,
14.4, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.30−1.22 (m, 1H), 0.60 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 128.8, 128.3, 124.7, 114.8, 69.2, 55.7, 46.8, 41.1, 26.7, 21.8, 20.3, 11.6.
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.1, 137.3, 130.0, 127.2, IR ν 3430, 2968, 1645, 1508, 1357, 1172, 1020 cm−1.
72.0, 58.1, 57.8, 27.5, 24.9, 21.7, 10.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C20H26N2O6S2Na+
IR ν 3430, 2948, 1645, 1434, 1165, 1020 cm−1. 477.1130, found 477.1135 (1.0 ppm error).
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C13H20N2O5S2Na+ Compound 6.
371.0711, found 371.0727 (4.3 ppm error).
Compound 3.
15994 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
Synthesized using General Procedure G on a 0.31 mmol scale. Synthesized using General Procedure G on a 0.2 mmol scale. Purified
Purified using a gradient of 10−35% EtOAc/hexanes on silica gel; using a gradient of 10−30% ethyl acetate in dichloromethane on silica
single diastereomer (white solid, 0.059 g, 0.14 mmol, 45% yield). gel; single diastereomer (colorless oil, 0.045 g, 0.165 mmol, 83%
1
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31−7.28 (m, 2H), 7.28−7.24 (m, yield).
1
4H), 7.25−7.21 (m, 1H), 7.00−6.96 (m, 2H), 4.68−4.59 (m, 1H), H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.13 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J
4.57−4.47 (m, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (dt, J = 9.5, 4.3 = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.69 (ddd, J = 13.0, 11.6, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (ddd, J =
Hz, 1H), 2.68−2.58 (m, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.95 (tdd, J = 14.5, 10.2, 11.4, 5.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (dddd, J = 12.1, 10.9, 4.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H),
4.1 Hz, 2H), 1.45 (dt, J = 12.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 0.88 (ddq, J = 14.3, 10.2, 3.39 (tdd, J = 8.4, 6.4, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (s, 3H), 2.12 (dtd, J = 14.6,
7.1 Hz, 1H), −0.03 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 12.7, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.78−1.69 (m, 1H), 1.69−1.60 (m, 2H), 1.03 (t, J
13
C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.0, 137.5, 136.3, 129.75, = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13
129.72, 129.3, 129.2, 127.2, 72.1, 63.8, 55.8, 23.6, 21.6 (2C), 10.1. C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 72.0, 58.4, 58.3, 42.0, 27.5,
IR ν 3422, 2971, 1654, 1636, 1559, 1457, 1363, 1317, 1174, 1092, 25.3, 10.7.
1018, 901, 801, 735, 664, 550 cm−1. IR ν 3299, 3265, 1434, 1348, 1317, 1172, 1126, 932 cm−1.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C19H24N2O5S2Na+ HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C7H17N2O5S2+
447.1024, found 447.1033 (2.0 ppm error). 273.0579, found 273.0571 (2.9 ppm error).
15995 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
15996 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C12H17N3O7S2Na+ 1H), 1.48 (dqd, J = 14.9, 7.4, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.37−1.20 (m, 1H), 0.70
402.0406, found 402.0409 (0.75 ppm error). (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13
Compound 20. C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 135.3, 134.1, 132.0, 129.7,
129.5, 129.4, 128.0, 127.8, 123.1, 68.7, 47.4, 41.5, 26.2, 20.1, 11.4.
IR ν 3368, 3276, 1505, 1362, 1317, 1155, 932 cm−1.
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C16H20N2O5S2Na+
407.0711, found 407.0701 (2.5 ppm error).
Compound 23.
15997 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.87−7.78 (m, 2H), 7.39−7.29 (m, Hz, 1H), 1.83−1.72 (m, 2H), 1.69−1.58 (m, 2H), 1.39−1.26 (m,
2H), 4.96 (s, 2H), 4.39−4.27 (m, 2H), 2.85 (dt, J = 7.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4H), 1.13−0.95 (m, 2H), 0.39 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H).
13
2.67 (td, J = 6.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.41−2.26 (m, 1H), 2.10 C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.9, 138.0, 129.9, 127.3,
(ddt, J = 15.0, 7.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 1.82−1.68 (m, 1H), 1.63 (dp, J = 70.3, 61.7, 58.9, 56.0, 32.0, 31.6, 26.2, 26.0, 25.3, 25.2, 23.0, 21.7, 9.9.
14.3, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). IR ν 3430, 2972, 1640, 1597, 1451, 1165, 1020, 930 cm−1.
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.5, 137.2, 129.8, 127.7, HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C19H30N2O5S2Na+
68.9, 50.9, 45.5, 29.6, 23.0, 21.8, 11.7. 453.1494, found 453.1500 (1.3 ppm error).
IR ν 3420, 2978, 1597, 1357, 1160, 1024 cm−1.
Compound 29.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C13H20N2O5S2Na+
371.0711, found 371.0725 (3.8 ppm error).
Compound 26.
15998 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
15999 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
16000 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
16001 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.99−7.92 (m, 2H), 7.35 (d, J =
8.1 Hz, 2H), 4.86 (ddd, J = 13.0, 11.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (ddd, J = 1
11.8, 5.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (ddd, J = 12.2, 3.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.00 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.95 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.39−
(ddd, J = 8.3, 3.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.11 (dtd, J = 14.5, 12.8, 7.29 (m, 2H), 4.82−4.60 (m, 2H), 4.46 (td, J = 7.2, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.38
5.2 Hz, 1H), 1.94 (ddq, J = 15.1, 7.5, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.90−1.78 (m, (ddd, J = 12.3, 7.3, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.28−2.10 (m, 1H),
2H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 2.01−1.85 (m, 3H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H).
13
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 146.8, 146.0, 134.9, 130.0, C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 148.5, 146.0, 135.0, 130.0,
128.8, 72.8, 60.8, 59.6, 28.0, 25.9, 21.9, 8.6. 128.7, 72.8, 59.4, 59.2, 24.6, 22.6, 21.9, 9.6.
IR ν 2974, 1771, 1600, 1540, 1354, 1194, 1083, 963 cm−1. IR ν 2965, 1770, 1590, 1540, 1365, 1194, 1090, 962 cm−1.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H18N2O6S2Na+ HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H18N2O6S2Na+
397.0504, found 397.0524 (5.0 ppm error). 397.0504, found 397.0520 (4.0 ppm error).
Compound 49. Compound 51.
16002 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
transferred to a separatory funnel, and washed with one portion of a (10 mL) and chilled H2O (10 mL). The contents of the reaction flask
saturated, aqueous NH4Cl solution. The organic layer was collected, were transferred to a separatory funnel with additional EtOAc (5 mL).
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel with EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layers were combined, dried with
(gradient of 50−100% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 51 as a white solid MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting
(50 mg, 0.15 mmol, 58% yield). residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (gradient of 30−
60% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 53 as a white solid (0.051 g, 0.144
mmol, 72% yield).
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J
= 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.17 (s, 1H), 4.38 (ddd, J = 7.7, 6.3, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.02
1
(ddd, J = 9.0, 7.7, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.70−3.51 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34−
2.08−1.99 (m, 2H), 1.95−1.78 (m, 2H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 7.28 (m, 2H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 4.23 (ddd, J = 12.2, 8.2, 4.2 Hz, 1H),
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) 156.5, 144.8, 136.4, 129.7, 4.04−3.96 (m, 2H), 3.33 (dddd, J = 8.6, 4.8, 2.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s,
128.3, 61.6, 52.9, 41.9, 31.6, 22.7, 21.8, 9.7. 3H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.86 (ddt, J = 15.5, 7.9, 5.9 Hz, 2H), 1.81−1.73
IR ν 3295, 2974, 1720, 1690, 1363, 1094, 815 cm−1. (m, 1H), 1.73−1.65 (m, 1H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H19ClN2O3SNa+ C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.2, 154.5, 144.8, 136.5,
353.0703, found 353.0713 (2.8 ppm error). 129.7, 128.1, 63.9, 60.5, 51.7, 35.7, 27.5, 21.8, 21.0, 8.3.
Compound 52. IR ν 3310, 2978, 1720, 1715, 1690, 1363, 1092, 815 cm−1.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C16H22N2O5SNa+
377.1147, found 377.1154 (1.9 ppm error).
Compound 54.
A 20 mL microwave vial was charged with a stir bar, 48 (75 mg, 0.2
mmol, 1 equiv), and CH3CN (2 mL). Dimethyl malonate (0.048 mL,
0.055 g, 0.42 mmol, 2.1 equiv) and cesium carbonate (0.136 g, 0.42
A 20 mL microwave vial was charged with a stir bar, 48 (0.075 g, 0.2
mmol, 2.1 equiv) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 36
mmol, 1 equiv), NaN3 (0.026 g, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv), and DMSO (2
h at room temperature. Following this time, the reaction was diluted mL). The heterogeneous mixture was stirred at room temperature for
with EtOAc (10 mL) and chilled H2O (10 mL). The contents of the 1 h. Following this time, the reaction was diluted with EtOAc (10
reaction flask were transferred to a separatory funnel with additional mL) and chilled H2O (10 mL). The contents of the reaction flask
EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous were transferred to a separatory funnel with additional EtOAc (5 mL).
layer was extracted with additional EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layers The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
were combined, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced with additional EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layers were combined,
pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
silica gel (gradient of 50−100% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 52 as a white resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel
solid (0.055 g, 0.13 mmol, 65% yield). (gradient of 50−100% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 54 as a white solid
(0.055 g, 0.163 mmol, 82% yield).
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00−7.88 (m, 2H), 7.39−7.27 (m,
1
2H), 5.21 (s, 1H), 3.97 (td, J = 5.7, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.74 (s, H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.92 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J
3H), 3.30 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (td, J = 7.4, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (s, = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 3.94 (dt, J = 7.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.42 (td, J
3H), 1.84 (dtd, J = 15.1, 7.2, 5.1 Hz, 4H), 1.42 (dtd, J = 13.1, 6.5, 2.9 = 6.5, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.93−1.72
Hz, 2H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). (m, 2H), 1.61 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 0.88 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.4, 169.3, 154.5, 144.7, C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.4, 145.0, 136.3, 129.8,
136.5, 129.7, 128.2, 63.6, 53.7, 52.9 (2C), 51.0, 34.1, 27.7, 24.0, 21.8, 128.1, 63.8, 52.3, 47.5, 35.3, 27.4, 21.8, 8.2.
8.3. IR ν 3320, 2970, 2094, 1748, 1585, 1365, 1256, 1092, 815 cm−1.
IR ν 3300, 2974, 1731, 1717, 1610, 1365, 1100, 820 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H19N5O3SNa+
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C19H26N2O7SNa+ 360.1106, found 360.1113 (1.9 ppm error).
449.1358, found 449.1366 (1.8 ppm error). Compound 55.
Compound 53.
16003 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
EtOAc (10 mL) and chilled H2O (10 mL). The contents of the Accession Codes
reaction flask were transferred to a separatory funnel with additional CCDC 2274209, 2277021−2277022, 2277024−2277025, and
EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous 2279638 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for
layer was extracted with additional EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layers this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via
were combined, dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The resulting residue was purified by chromatography on
www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_
silica gel (gradient of 50−100% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 55 as a white request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge
solid (0.062 g, 0.161 mmol, 81% yield). Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
■ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
Shyam Sathyamoorthi − Department of Medicinal Chemistry,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.95−7.87 (m, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = States; orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-7349;
8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 3.94 (ddd, J = 6.9, 3.9, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.48− Email: ssathyam@ku.edu
3.26 (m, 1H), 2.49 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.87−1.81 (m,
2H), 1.75−1.55 (m, 2H), 1.29 (s, 9H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). Authors
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 154.8, 144.7, 136.5, 129.7, Someshwar Nagamalla − Department of Medicinal Chemistry,
128.1, 63.9, 53.4, 42.6, 36.1, 31.0, 27.6, 23.8, 21.8, 8.3. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
IR ν 3359, 2965, 1748, 1597, 1363, 1169, 1093, 815 cm−1. Annu Anna Thomas − Department of Medicinal Chemistry,
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H28N2O3S2Na+
407.1439, found 407.1445 (1.5 ppm error).
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
Compound 56. Appasaheb K. Nirpal − Department of Medicinal Chemistry,
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, United States
Joel T. Mague − Department of Chemistry, Tulane University,
New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, United States
Complete contact information is available at:
https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
A 20 mL microwave vial was charged with a stir bar, 50 (0.075 g, 0.2
mmol, 1 equiv), NaN3 (0.013 g, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), and DMSO (2 Notes
mL). The heterogeneous mixture was stirred at room temperature for
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
1 h. Following this time, the reaction was diluted with EtOAc (10
mL) and chilled H2O (10 mL). The contents of the reaction flask
were transferred to a separatory funnel with additional EtOAc (5 mL).
The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health
with additional EtOAc (5 mL). The organic layers were combined, grant (R35GM142499) and a CMADP pilot project grant
dried with MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The (P30GM145499) awarded to S.S. Justin Douglas and Sarah
resulting residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel Neuenswander (KU NMR Lab) are acknowledged for help
(gradient of 50−100% EtOAc/hexanes) to give 56 as a white solid with structure elucidation. Lawrence Seib and Anita Saraf (KU
(0.051 g, 0.15 mmol, 75% yield).
Mass Spectrometry Facility) are acknowledged for help
acquiring HRMS data. J.T.M. thanks Tulane University for
support of the Tulane Crystallography Laboratory.
■ REFERENCES
(1) Bennani, Y. L.; Hanessian, S. trans-1,2-Diaminocyclohexane
1
H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00−7.86 (m, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = Derivatives as Chiral Reagents, Scaffolds, and Ligands for Catalysis:
8.1 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (s, 1H), 4.43−4.30 (m, 1H), 3.87 (td, J = 8.3, 4.5 Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis and Molecular Recognition.
Hz, 1H), 3.59−3.37 (m, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 1.90 (ddd, J = 15.0, 7.5, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3161−3196.
6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.83−1.67 (m, 3H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). (2) Lucet, D.; Le Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C. The Chemistry of Vicinal
13
C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.9, 144.7, 136.6, 129.7, Diamines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2580−2627.
128.2, 61.6, 53.7, 49.7, 28.3, 22.7, 21.8, 9.7. (3) Viso, A.; Fernández de la Pradilla, R.; García, A.; Flores, A. α,β-
IR ν 3340, 2980, 2110, 1745, 1585, 1365, 1256, 1090, 815 cm−1. Diamino Acids: Biological Significance and Synthetic Approaches.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C14H19N5O3SNa+ Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3167−3196.
360.1106, found 360.1112 (1.7 ppm error). (4) Kizirian, J.-C. Chiral Tertiary Diamines in Asymmetric Synthesis.
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 140−205.
■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Data Availability Statement
(5) Saibabu Kotti, S. R. S.; Timmons, C.; Li, G. Vicinal Diamino
Functionalities as Privileged Structural Elements in Biologically Active
Compounds and Exploitation of their Synthetic Chemistry. Chem.
The data underlying this study are available in the published Biol. Drug Des. 2006, 67, 101−114.
article and its Supporting Information. (6) Surry, D. S.; Buchwald, S. L. Diamine ligands in copper-catalyzed
*
sı Supporting Information reactions. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 13−31.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at (7) Hejnosz, S. L.; Beres, D. R.; Cocolas, A. H.; Neal, M. J.; Musiak,
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731. B. S.; Hanna, M. M. B.; Bloomfield, A. J.; Montgomery, T. D. [3 + 2]
Cycloadditions of Tertiary Amine N-Oxides and Silyl Imines as an
Experimental procedures, reasoning for structural assign- Innovative Route to 1,2-Diamines. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 4638−4643.
ments, NMR spectra, and crystallographic information (8) Okada, A.; Shibuguchi, T.; Ohshima, T.; Masu, H.; Yamaguchi,
(PDF) K.; Shibasaki, M. Enantio- and Diastereoselective Catalytic Mannich-
16004 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
Type Reaction of a Glycine Schiff Base Using a Chiral Two-Center (29) Khoder, Z. M.; Wong, C. E.; Chemler, S. R. Stereoselective
Phase-Transfer Catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4564−4567. Synthesis of Isoxazolidines via Copper-Catalyzed Alkene Diamination.
(9) Davis, T. A.; Johnston, J. N. Catalytic, enantioselective synthesis ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 4775−4779.
of stilbenecis-diamines: A concise preparation of (−)-Nutlin-3, a (30) Wu, Z.; Wen, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W. Pd(II)-Catalyzed
potent p53/MDM2 inhibitor. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1076−1079. Aerobic Intermolecular 1,2-Diamination of Conjugated Dienes: A
(10) Noble, A.; Anderson, J. C. Nitro-Mannich Reaction. Chem. Rev. Regio- and Chemoselective [4 + 2] Annulation for the Synthesis of
2013, 113, 2887−2939. Tetrahydroquinoxalines. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 2813−2816.
(11) Liew, S. K.; He, Z.; St. Denis, J. D.; Yudin, A. K. (31) Dai, J.-J.; Yin, X.; Li, L.; Rivera, M. E.; Wang, Y.-C.; Dai, M.
Stereocontrolled Synthesis of 1,2- and 1,3-Diamine Building Blocks Modular and practical diamination of allenes. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14,
from Aziridine Aldehyde Dimers. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 11637− 1774.
11645. (32) Zabawa, T. P.; Kasi, D.; Chemler, S. R. Copper(II) Acetate
(12) Holst, D. E.; Dorval, C.; Winter, C. K.; Guzei, I. A.; Wickens, Z. Promoted Intramolecular Diamination of Unactivated Olefins. J. Am.
K. Regiospecific Alkene Aminofunctionalization via an Electro- Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11250−11251.
generated Dielectrophile. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 8299−8307. (33) Adams, C. S.; Boralsky, L. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Schomaker, J. M.
(13) Saryazdi, S.; Parkin, S.; Grossman, R. B. 1,2-Diamination of Modular Functionalization of Allenes to Aminated Stereotriads. J. Am.
Alkenes via 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition with Azidium Ions or Azides. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10807−10810.
Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 331−335. (34) Zhu, Y.; Smith, M. J. S.; Tu, W.; Bower, J. F. A Stereospecific
(14) Wang, C.; Liu, B.; Shao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Shao, A.; Zou, L.-H.; Alkene 1,2-Aminofunctionalization Platform for the Assembly of
Wen, J. Synthesis of 1,2-Diamines from Vinyl Sulfonium Salts and Complex Nitrogen-Containing Ring Systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Arylamines. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 6455−6459. 2023, 62, No. e202301262.
(15) Lee, B. J.; Ickes, A. R.; Gupta, A. K.; Ensign, S. C.; Ho, T. D.; (35) Guo, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J. Selective 1,2-Aminoisothiocyana-
Tarasewicz, A.; Vanable, E. P.; Kortman, G. D.; Hull, K. L. Synthesis tion of 1,3-Dienes Under Visible-Light Photoredox Catalysis. Angew.
of Unsymmetrical Vicinal Diamines via Directed Hydroamination. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 4085−4089.
Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 5513−5518. (36) Govaerts, S.; Angelini, L.; Hampton, C.; Malet-Sanz, L.;
(16) Li, Y.; Ali, A.; Dong, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Liu, Q.; Fu, J. Ruffoni, A.; Leonori, D. Photoinduced Olefin Diamination with
Copper-Catalyzed Diamination of Unactivated Alkenes With Alkylamines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15021−15028.
Electron-Rich Amino Sources. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 4072−4077. (37) Orcel, U.; Waser, J. One-Pot Three-Component Synthesis of
(17) Cao, J.; Lv, D.; Yu, F.; Chiou, M.-F.; Li, Y.; Bao, H. Vicinal Diamines via In Situ Aminal Formation and Carboamination.
Regioselective Three-Component Synthesis of Vicinal Diamines via Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12881−12885.
1,2-Diamination of Styrenes. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 3184−3189. (38) Ciesielski, J.; Dequirez, G.; Retailleau, P.; Gandon, V.; Dauban,
(18) Minakata, S.; Miwa, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Hirayama, A.; P. Rhodium-Catalyzed Alkene Difunctionalization with Nitrenes.
Okumura, S. Diastereodivergent Intermolecular 1,2-Diamination of Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 9338−9347.
(39) Tao, Z.; Gilbert, B. B.; Denmark, S. E. Catalytic,
Unactivated Alkenes Enabled by Iodine Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Enantioselective syn-Diamination of Alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2021, 143, 4112−4118.
(19) Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Hong, S. Y.; Chang, S. Tuning Orbital 2019, 141, 19161−19170.
(40) Chen, X.; Xiao, F.; He, W.-M. Recent developments in the
Symmetry of Iridium Nitrenoid Enables Catalytic Diastereo- and
difunctionalization of alkenes with C-N bond formation. Org. Chem.
Enantioselective Alkene Difunctionalizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021,
Front. 2021, 8, 5206−5228.
143, 3993−4004.
(41) de Figueiredo, R. M. Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Diamination
(20) Makai, S.; Falk, E.; Morandi, B. Direct Synthesis of
of Olefins. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1190−1193.
Unprotected 2-Azidoamines from Alkenes via an Iron-Catalyzed (42) Cardona, F.; Goti, A. Metal-catalysed 1,2-diamination reactions.
Difunctionalization Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 21548− Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 269−275.
21555. (43) Muñiz, K.; Martínez, C. Development of Intramolecular Vicinal
(21) Fayssal, S. A.; Giungi, A.; Berhal, F.; Prestat, G. Iron-Catalyzed Diamination of Alkenes: From Palladium to Bromine Catalysis. J. Org.
Intra-intermolecular Aminoazidation of Alkenes. Org. Process Res. Dev. Chem. 2013, 78, 2168−2174.
2020, 24, 695−703. (44) De Jong, S.; Nosal, D. G.; Wardrop, D. J. Methods for direct
(22) Shen, K.; Wang, Q. Copper-catalyzed diamination of alkene diamination, new & old. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 4067−4105.
unactivated alkenes with hydroxylamines. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 4279− (45) Zhu, Y.; Cornwall, R. G.; Du, H.; Zhao, B.; Shi, Y. Catalytic
4283. Diamination of Olefins via N-N Bond Activation. Acc. Chem. Res.
(23) Wang, L.; Wang, C. Copper-Catalyzed Diamination of Oxime 2014, 47, 3665−3678.
Ester-Tethered Unactivated Alkenes with Unprotected Amines. J. Org. (46) Stanković, S.; D’Hooghe, M.; Catak, S.; Eum, H.; Waroquier,
Chem. 2019, 84, 6547−6556. M.; Van Speybroeck, V.; De Kimpe, N.; Ha, H.-J. Regioselectivity in
(24) Sauer, G. S.; Lin, S. An Electrocatalytic Approach to the Radical the ring opening of non-activated aziridines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41,
Difunctionalization of Alkenes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 5175−5187. 643−665.
(25) Shen, S.-J.; Zhu, C.-L.; Lu, D.-F.; Xu, H. Iron-Catalyzed Direct (47) Singh, G. S.; D’Hooghe, M.; De Kimpe, N. Synthesis and
Olefin Diazidation via Peroxyester Activation Promoted by Nitrogen- Reactivity of C-Heteroatom-Substituted Aziridines. Chem. Rev. 2007,
Based Ligands. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4473−4482. 107, 2080−2135.
(26) Conway, J. H., Jr.; Rovis, T. Regiodivergent Iridium(III)- (48) Lu, P. Recent developments in regioselective ring opening of
Catalyzed Diamination of Alkenyl Amides with Secondary Amines: aziridines. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2549−2560.
Complementary Access to γ- or δ-Lactams. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, (49) Olson, D. E.; Su, J. Y.; Roberts, D. A.; Du Bois, J. Vicinal
140, 135−138. Diamination of Alkenes under Rh-Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014,
(27) Wu, M.-S.; Fan, T.; Chen, S.-S.; Han, Z.-Y.; Gong, L.-Z. Pd(II)- 136, 13506−13509.
Catalyzed Asymmetric Oxidative 1,2-Diamination of Conjugated (50) Shinde, A. H.; Sathyamoorthi, S. Oxidative Cyclization of
Dienes with Ureas. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2485−2489. Sulfamates onto Pendant Alkenes. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 896−901.
(28) Shen, K.; Wang, Q. Copper-Catalyzed Alkene Aminoazidation (51) Paul, D.; Mague, J. T.; Sathyamoorthi, S. Sulfamate-Tethered
as a Rapid Entry to 1,2-Diamines and Installation of an Azide Aza-Wacker Cyclization Strategy for the Syntheses of 2-Amino-2-
Reporter onto Azahetereocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13110− deoxyhexoses: Preparation of Orthogonally Protected d-Galactos-
13116. amines. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 1445−1456.
16005 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006
The Journal of Organic Chemistry pubs.acs.org/joc Note
16006 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01731
J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 15989−16006