Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title Pages
Brahma Prakash
scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered
trademark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries.
Published in India by
Oxford University Press
Page 1 of 2
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
2/11 Ground Floor, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110 002,
India
Page 2 of 2
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
(p.vii) Preface
Brahma Prakash
Page 1 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
On the one side the spirit world was frightening and enslaving, on the other side
it was also empowering and enabling. One who believed in that world also
accumulated immense power. They could see forests moving and mountains
dancing. They could mobilize the symbols at will. It enables people to fight the
higher enemies. It enables members to cooperate and work as a community.
With such animated power, Dina and Bhadri, two Dalit brothers, could fight big
feudal lords in Bihar in stories and ballads. It may not be in real life but in
imagination. I would make figures from terracota or clay and believe that one
day they will fire at my enemy camp. I would imagine they are flying in the air
and showering bows and arrows on the enemy camp. If we were not in the
position to fight the powerful, we would indulge in shadow boxing. Beliefs mixed
with imagination would create a reality that was more than real. It would work
as an escape, it would work as a utopia, it was leaning in the past, it was a
projection in the future. It was here and now with its presence. It was a livid,
vivid experience of feeling and imagination. The folk world is full of such
portrayals and imaginative praxis.
Apart from the critical analysis of the cultural practices, this work aims to
explore the creative potential of such practices. While the work aims to analyse
shows the power of performances (p.ix) and their transformative potential. The
performance can be politically problematic, but creatively powerful. We have
examples of the use of Greek myths in secular theatre. The Noh theatre of Japan
has been using ghosts and spirit worlds to create characters and express
unfulfilled desires. We have examples to show how Dalit artists transformed the
meanings of gestures and the role of instruments (such as dappu) to resist
traditional oppression. Can we think and bring the spirits to tell their stories to
discuss the injustices done? I approach the world from the perspective of one
himself by commenting on it. I do not have any option but to continually vacillate
narrative. My intention here is not to bridge the gaps but to create holes in
which the spirits can breathe and make their presence felt on the landscape as
de
Castro (2015)
Page 2 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
engaging with the world, which models a different conceptual universe than
ours.
every animal, every plant, and every natural phenomenon has awareness and
feelings, and can communicate directly with humans gives it advantage in the
creative contexts. These cultural practices may offer us a conceptual model to
think how object and materials in theatre and performance, with feeling,
awareness, potency, and agency, can subvert our world of thoughts however with
a question as to what happens to this animated world in a caste society. This
aspect is intricately connected to the aesthetic question of the distribution of
sensibilities. The change in our conceptual thinking can enrich our artistic and
creative engagements.
Folk world is a world of animated beliefs. They think through an animated world.
From stones to forests, objects and materials acquire deeper meanings and
complex thinking. Animists believe that there is no barrier between humans and
other beings. They can all communicate directly through speech, song, dance,
(p.x) and ceremony. While we need to recognize the problems associated with
the performance culture, the idea is not necessarily to believe in ghosts or
create a forest but create ghost-like sensations and to bring theatre under what
Sontag 1976: 215).
The flock of crows would come in the morning. They would fill the soundscape
with their cawing orchestras. Many times, we would get irritated; many times,
we would read them as messengers. Some would ask them to jump and tell who
is coming. By seeing how the crow jumped, they would decipher the movement
of the guest; in the sound, they would find the message. But a dark black crow
would be a bad omen, a signal that someone has died or someone is going to die.
Birds would have castes, animals would have names, and trees would have
figures. Not only living beings, but ordinary objects were also supposed to
possess lives and spirits. The broom deity had to be kept properly or else she
would get angry, the kitchenware would gossip once people went to sleep, the
sickle would sing, and the trowel would go dancing in the fields. It was an
animated world, a world of sensorium, wherein senses could have mobilized at
Page 3 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
I could see from where he is drawing this connection in his revolutionary songs.
The treatment of broom gives me a sense of materiality and caste relationship in
Indian society. Not only is performance at the centre of the community, but it is
the performance that creates this set of connection and affective values around
dances, songs, music, and activates (p.xi) memory. Though the performance
constitutes an extremely imaginative understanding of the world, they are also
part of the hegemonic social structure. Often, they are the product of those
social relations that absorb those structures in their manifestations.
If that was the world of flow of spirits, then it was also a world of slavery. It was
the world of violent acts and imaginations. There was no space for individual
freedom and thinking. There was no distinction between nature and culture. It
was a fatalistic world in which every other explanation would end in the name of
fate. Spirits would speak the language of power. It was a terrifying world of
ghosts and spirits with fatalistic beliefs in which any imagination of social
transformation would appear impossible.
I am no longer part of that world, but those people are there, a world is there, a
world of belief is there. The world was a sensual and animated world where cats
meowing, dogs crying, and foxes howling expressed signs that had meanings.
They have something to say, something to share. That world needs to be
engaged, whether we like it or not. It has a mobilizing power, whether we
believe it or not. Either we want to counter it or reclaim it, we cannot merely
escape that perceptual world. But can we think of this world without
performance? So much in this society depends on performance that our world
appears to be an extra-performative world. There is a kind of performativity all
around. We must engage with this popular culture with its tastes and tendencies
and with its morality and sensibility, even if it is backward, conventional, and
oppressive.
This work tries to understand the conceptions of the folk world and its presence
in the marginalized sections of the caste-based society of India. Most
importantly, it tries to understand how these cultural practices produce values?
people think, believe, and act. It can be hegemonic, but it also has radical
potential. What is interesting about this mode of conceptualization is its
immediacy with community life. It is not simply a spirit world, but materiality is
term. Unfortunately, we do not have any other term that can capture the specific
Page 4 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
weapon wielded and unleashed against collective defiance of the people (1986:
3). This attack is carried out through market, religion, language, education, and
the media. Once the cultural bomb is planted, it can be easily internalized and
executed by the victims themselves. Whether through imperialism or caste-
based colonization, colonialism in all forms has continuously annihilated the
creative power of the individual as well as of the collective. A cultural bomb
creates a chain of reactions and a cycle of violence whose patterns are
everywhere but is difficult to pin down. This can be found in our behaviour,
practices, and education. It would not be an exaggeration to say that most of us
While growing up in a north Indian village in the 1980s and 1990s, I strongly felt
the impact of the cultural bomb. I would like to critically reflect on that situation
and draw some connections. I started attending primary school from the fourth
standard. I believed in magic, spirits, fairytales, and ancestor worship. I believed
in totemic figures and hoped that they would perform real magical acts some
day. I would arm them with bows and arrows in the hope that they would fire at
reached the eighth standard, the Hindu deities were dominantly becoming a part
of my cultural and religious beliefs. I would consider spirit cults to be
(p.xiii)
practices. At that stage, the most important lesson I internalized was the
worshippers. My mother would often ask me to go and seek blessings from the
bhagat (the village shaman). I would ridicule her belief as irrational and
unscientific. But oddly, I would perform the aarti of goddess Saraswati for the
same blessings. Education was creating a divide, not between rational and
irrational beliefs or traditional and modern culture. Instead, it was working on
the basis of social hierarchies and cultural divisions.
Page 5 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
gradually developing a sense of shame and disgust for it. My new education did
not consider agrarian labour dignified enough. While cutting grass for fodder, if I
would see an educated person approaching, I would hide in the fields. What
would he think about me? I was developing a sense of insecurity and was trying
to become somebody else. In school, I would avoid sitting next to Dalit and
lower-caste students and would try to befriend students from upper castes. That
would give me a sense of superiority, and I would try to display that attitude
among students from my own caste. The alienation was further getting
consolidated as I was growing up and getting ahead in studies. In the tenth
standard, I would feel ashamed seeing my mother and sisters working in the
fields. My concern had nothing to do with their labour and exploitation, rather
the shame and disgust attached to that labour. The idea of shame, disgust, and
status was intensely shaping my cultural sensibility and political consciousness.
Occasions like weddings and festivals were the time of social gatherings. Bidesia
and orchestra party would come to the village to perform. Students would feel
dizzy and sleepy in class after watching days and nights of performance. The
teachers would make a sarcastic remark, raat bhar nach dekh rahe hoge (must
(p.xiv)
nach
in nature, wherein art, culture, and aesthetic values are invested in labour.
Cultural Labour offers a conceptual framework to examine various ways in which
This conceptual framework does not place culture against labour, but labour as a
culture, and culture as labour in performance practices. It examines the way
cultural labour presents an affective and aestheticized labour and laboured
to bring the tensions and fissures present in the community-based culture and
performance.
I delineate five significant tropes from the theories of theatre and performance
studies to draw a conceptual framework: landscape, materiality, viscerality and
(syn)aesthetics, performativity, and choreopolitics, to analyse this connection
Page 6 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
and explore the politics and aesthetics of the folk performance with a focus on
Bihar and Telangana. I do not claim that this work offers the last reading and
understanding of such performances. This is one of the several ways of
approaching the folk performances as part of a strategy for a new culture.
It would be difficult to recall all those people who helped me in carrying out this
research. Too many people have helped me in too many ways. I cannot recall all
the names but I would like to express my gratitude to all of them. Foremost, I
Dhivya Janarthanan, and Pradeep Shinde. I owe my thanks and deep gratitude to
my teachers and colleagues at JNU: Bishnupriya Dutt, H.S. Shiva Prakash,
Urmimala Sarkar, Soumyabrata Choudhury, Rustom Bharucha, Y.S. Alone and
RK. Rajarajan for their immense love and support (p.xvi) and for nurturing me
in my academic life. I also thank faculty members and staff at the School of Arts
and Aesthetics, JNU, New Delhi, for their unforgettable sharing of ideas and
experiences. Words are always insufficient to thank my mentors and friends
Page 7 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
I dedicate this work to my mother who had to work and struggle hard to send us
to school. She has been an immense support but the biggest critic of this work.
She is the one whose stories have inspired me to take up this work, but she is
the one who refuses to accept my authority on this subject.
Notes:
(1
Rao and Antara Dev Sen. The Little Magazine, 2007.
Page 8 of 8
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Introduction
Brahma Prakash
DOI:10.1093/oso/9780199490813.003.0001
Keywords: Cultural labour, performance studies, methodology, affective and performative turn,
aesthetics
[I]n order to achieve the desired end, the spirit of folklore studies should
be changed, as well as deepened and extended. Folklore must not be
considered an eccentricity, an oddity or picturesque elements, but as
something which is very serious and is taken seriously. Only in this way will
the teaching of folklore be more efficient and really bring about the birth
of a new culture among the broad popular masses.
Page 1 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Time: 10:30 pm, Birpur, a remote village in Bihar Situation: To announce the play
of the night, the USTAD (DIRECTOR-MANAGER) of the theatre party came on
stage. He began a conversation with the joker, a comic character in Bidesia. A
performance of cultural labour then commenced.
USTAD:
[to the joker] who are you? Are you a (political) leader or an artist?
JOKER:
How stupid of you to ask! Of course, I know how to sing and dance! Otherwise,
how would I be an artist? [Singing and dancing are considered as the
fundamental skills of these artists] (p.2)
USTAD:
Of course, I will sing even if you do not ask me. This is what I love and what I
have devoted myself to ... [The joker takes a round on stage. He walks around
the stage and sings]
Sagro umar ham nachahun mein bitayali
USTAD:
Page 2 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
[laughs
Lata Singh interviews a woman tamasha artist, Shantabai, who narrates her
passion for the art:
Many a time, my sisters and parents have requested me to give up this life
nasha
bondage between culture and labour that aestheticize labouring bodies in their
exhaustive work environment and performance context. The society produces a
condition of performativity in which the body and work can only be realized
through cultural performances. While the body becomes an actor, work becomes
Workers have to play their roles or assigned caste roles to get the production
values of their works recognized. In other words, the merit of their works do not
exist outside their assigned roles. While caste society as a whole habitually
functions in a performative context, it is only in the performance context that
one can imagine and think of reversal or subversion of these roles. The
performances of cultural labour are potentially so double-edged in their
Page 3 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
consequences that they can neither be appreciated and nor can be escaped in
the production of new culture.
Sagro umar ham nachahun mein bitayali (the life I spent in dancing) is a self-
India. The above skit is an excerpt of a comedy scene enacted by bidesia artistes
in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. The excerpt conveys some of the key concerns this
work explores. Likewise, the interview of tamasha artist Shantabai reveals the
nature and intricacies of performance embodied in culture and labour. Such
performances produce labouring bodies if not always in an empirical sense but
very much conceptually (p.4) so. Who are these artistes and what is their
background? What do they perform, for instance, what do singers and drummers
produce in a ritual worship of bhuiyan puja or what do the performers produce
they affect their self, environment, and society at large? And, what do the
performers invest and for whom do they perform? For example, what does the
balladeer Gaddar invest and produce in his singing of revolutionary songs? What
are their idea, conception, and the world of performance? And, what is the
labour of such performance which produces such an animated, affective and a
real world of beliefs? This work asks several such questions at the most
fundamental level.
Even
within the field of traditional performances, the problems are more acute with
the study of the performance of the subaltern communities. Scholars have used
various methods and approaches to explore this field of study. But, in most
cases, their writings have focused on what Gramsci indicated (as quoted in the
epigraph) as the descriptive and picturesque representation. They are viewed
through stereotyped images, and as superstitious, animistic, and primitive
beliefs. Such views largely come from the upper rungs of the society. The field of
study remains insufficiently theorized and lacks a methodological and
conceptual approach at the most basic level. This lack has been one of the major
reasons for the oblivion and misrepresentation of the performance in larger (p.
5)
category, and therefore there is a need to approach the field creatively from a
Page 4 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
more critical perspective. Besides, in most of the cases, existing studies with
sociological and historical perspectives focus on the representational aspects of
the performance and denies its aesthetics and performative dimensions. Using
affective (includes aesthetic as well) and performativity as two important
will not ask questions; paddy and potato will not follow their movements. The
songs may not have any direct effect on the crop. But these practices have a
palpable affect on the farmers and labourers who believe that their song will
nurture their crops with great care. With this belief, they proceed to the task of
tending the crops with greater confidence and energy than before, and that does
have a real effect on production. It is obvious that this effect on the crop is made
possible through the affective dimension of performance. One can also think of
an adverse example in which this affective quality of performance becomes an
enslaving force. For example, service castes receive daan (ritual gift) from their
jajman (patrons) and produce life-long servitude in many ritual practices in
India. Receiving dan is also an act of giving consent. Gyan Prakash (1986)
examines the spirit cult practice in south Bihar to show how they produce
unequal relations between kamias (lower caste) and maliks (upper caste).
Page 5 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
The performance, however, is not merely a representational object, but like any
Lyotard 1991: 93). I
term the potential of association sanskrutik sram (cultural labour). Cultural
labour produces aesthetic and cultural values. I posit this working definition of
sanskrutik shram or the cultural labour: sanskrutik sram ka tatparya aesi
sanskrutik aur performance kriya se hai jisme vyakti ya samuday sanskruti ke
dwara sram mein yogdan karta hai aur (p.7) aesthetic aur sanskrutik mulyon
ka utpadan karta hai (The cultural labour stands for the culture and performance
activities in which individual or community produces aesthetic and cultural
values through the modes of cultural expressions). Unlike immaterial labour,
which is a global phenomenon, cultural labour is a local phenomenon. It
operates through its mnemonic networks. Despite its universal encompassing
characteristics in a jati
and location. The performance of cultural labour produces a set of relationships
with people and places. While they renew, reinforce, and rupture the existing
bond, they may also strengthen the same and has the potential to create a new
set of relationships. The performance encodes the aesthetic distinction and
suggests relations of power (Conquergood 2013; Sax 2002). This work tries to
bring the potentials of associations produced by the performances of cultural
labour in specific contexts.
assertion of the desire of the ordinary people. Using affective and performative
approach to theatre and performance studies, this work tries to bring such
Page 6 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
effects. Ritual and performance in their affective turn produce corporeal values
in the form of impulses, feelings, sensations, and passions. Deeply rooted in the
ritualized context, the performance reveals the most vivid exemplification of
formation of cultural and aesthetic values in society. I aim to explore, also, how
the performance produces meanings and values and help sustain them at what
(p.8) structures of
feeling is performative values, which creates, what James Scott (1990) would
brings the understanding of culture in relation to its body and materiality. This
work also indirectly proposes a novel way of understanding the affective
relationship between culture and labour. The underlying problem is that artistes
and performers from the subaltern communities fit neither as artistes nor as
labourers. Yet they are artistes and labourers, and therefore their contributions
need to be recognized on both fronts. By explicating cultural labour, the work
brings the materiality of manual labour and labouring bodies in aesthetic
discourse. While the body has its own creative dimension in the postmodernist
relation between the subject who experiences and the context and content of
Guru and Sarukkai 2012: 36).
Page 7 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
The performers often survive and earn their livelihoods through performance.
They are cultural labourers in an economic sense. We can take examples of
bidesia, nautanki, and other rituals as well as commercial performances where
performers are workers. The performers, however, not only entertain and
exhaust their bodies, but also produce social and aesthetic values, which are
immediate in nature. In other words, performance becomes labour because it
provides social and artistic values and a particular kind of self-conception
through it. In another case, performance is labour because it produces specific
values, knowingly or unknowingly. For example, in ritual and festivals,
communities mobilize symbols and memories to create a conception of world
and life. Performance is a value-producing act, and thus, so is labour.
Performers are labourers in two different ways: as workers like any other worker
and as cultural workers who create value. In the first case, raw materials
become a commodity; in the second case, the performers themselves may
become a commodity or can change a product to an object of art. Put differently,
what a performer labours is performance, and what performers perform is
labour. Cultural labour is a labour carried out through the means of performance
and cultural enactments. What it produces is a set of meanings, feelings,
interpretations, and associations. The associations can be real or imagined;
feelings can be fake or genuine. The values can be enslaving or liberating or
both. In the same way, performance can be free labour as well as un-free
(bonded) labour. At one time, performers can become willing slaves of the
powerful, and at another, they may subvert the power relationship.
Unlike other forms of artistic and cultural practices, such performances remain
denigrated in the eyes of the social elites and the feudal upper castes for
different reasons. A significant number of folk performances across India fall in
this category. Spirit worship traditions across South Asia, for example, (p.10)
bhootaradhane (worship of Bhoota, the spirit) in Karnataka, theyyam in Kerala,
and land worship ceremonies, represent the performance tradition. Kuttu
traditions of south India (e.g., therakuttu), nach traditions of north India (for
example, launda nach (dance of men) of Bihar, nachni of Bengal and nacha of
the most visible examples of the performance of cultural labour. What are the
constitutive elements of these performances that create the aesthetics of disgust
and marginalize the performance traditions in the dominant discourses? How
Page 8 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
does the category of cultural labour and aesthetics figure within such a
relationship?
Based on an extensive field study of five such folk performances, I examined the
role played by cultural labour in (un)production of values and associations in
Indian society. The performance includes bhuiyan puja (a land worship
celebration or worship of bhuiyan cult), bidesiya or bidesia (the theatre of
migrant labourers), Reshma-Chuharmal (a Dalit ballad), dugola (singer duels)
from the Indian state of Bihar and the performances of Gaddar and Jana Natya
Mandali (JNM) from Telangana. Using ethnography, archival material, and
personal memory, this work offers a conceptual frame to study the performance
of cultural labour in particular, and the status of the marginalized folk
performance in general. While performance here functions as an object of study
as well as an analytical tool, critical ethnography provides an ethical
responsibility. In the case of bhuiyan puja, the performance mobilizes stories and
memories to produce a landscape. Stories and narrative mark the places and
endow value in them. Place and landscape are the affective productions of
cultural labour that communities mobilize. In the case of bidesia, the connection
is overt with migrant labourers producing certain kinds of bodies and materiality
through the performance. In the case of Reshma-Chuharmal, performativity
creates self and community in various ways. In the context of Gaddar and Jana
Natya Mandali, revolutionary performers rupture the world of cultural labour
through their radical intervention. They redefine cultural labour, labouring
bodies, and symbols and values around them in new ways. As a result, the (p.
11) performance produces a new political subjectivity and a new set of cultural
values.
In this work, labouring body and its affective performativity is the single most
channelizing theme that underlines one performance to others, and one issue to
others. Morja Puncer locates affective performativity upon the body such that
perfectly it applies in the construction of a labouring body:
The affective performativity aligns an individual with the community, bodies with
places, and real with the imagined in its liminality. The relationship changes the
way things and relationships appear. It may or may not have a direct impact on
the social relationship. Even though the performance embarks on the question of
survival, that is, day-to-day struggles, it would be impossible to reduce it to the
Page 9 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Cultural Labour
art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by a man
Raymond Williams has proposed the most focused and, at the same time, the
most widely applicable definitions of culture. He argued that the complicated
transition of the concept of culture is still underway. Culture and labour in the
present discourse appear as two separate activities remotely connected to each
Page 10 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
But what is the notion of culture in the Indian context and what has been its
This was one of the major reasons that led to the marginalization of the folk
performances of the subaltern communities. This marginalization did not happen
only at the discursive level; it had a strong material basis as well.
The discourses of the humanities and social sciences played an essential role in
shaping this distinction. While social sciences (p.14) carried out differentiation
through social norms, the discourse of humanities articulated differences
through symbolic names (Maxwell and Miller 2005: 3). Humanities placed it
under the regime of aesthetics in which culture came to serve as a marker of
values, tastes, attitudes, and experiences of social classes. The idea of culture as
a particular category was further concretized with the discourse of modernity.
Page 11 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
This also has to do with the notion of aesthetic, civilization, and development of
the civic sense as well.
As this gap widened, art and culture became merely leisure activities that could
be mobilized or controlled to gain symbolic capital. At the same time, the
understanding of artistic production began to be established as being distinct
from both manufacturing and menial labour activities.
Namvar Singh argues how in the contact of aesthetics, artistic criteria became
the first condition to appreciate the culture. Since the artistic criteria were the
basis of aesthetics, they became the essential components of culture. It was
fundamentally believed that one who is capable of appreciating art has the real
regime of art and aesthetics. The bourgeois notion of art and culture as leisure
activities (free activity) faced challenges from several scholars (Rojek 2010;
Thomson 1967; Williams 1977;). (p.15) Recently, there has been an attempt to
bring the question of labour in the field of art and culture. The discourse of
labour has experienced at once a significant revival and related openness.
Needless to say that there has been a cultural turn in labour studies and a
labour turn in cultural studies. This work stands at the intersection of this new
shift.
Page 12 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
labour and its circulation is a deeply current issue in Indian society and is
situated within the contemporary discourse of culture and politics.
Karl Marx has briefly discussed the relationship between art, creativity, and
non-alienated conditions, art and labour will not remain as two separate entities
rather functioning as co-producers. The possible claim provides the basis for a
humanist aesthetics (Bottomore 1983). Creative labour was supposed to bring
art and labour together in their self-creation, transformations, and mutual
manifestations. He envisioned a society in which not only art and leisure but also
labour will become creative. Marx introduced the idea of productive and
unproductive labour about capital. He was of the view that labour existed for its
Milton, who did the Paradise Lost for five pounds, was an unproductive
labourer. On the other hand, the writer who turns out stuff for his
publisher in factory style is a productive labourer ... A singer who (p.16)
sells her songs for her own account is an unproductive labourer. But the
same singer commissioned by an entrepreneur to sing in order to make
money for him is a productive labourer; for she produces capital. (Marx
1867: 389)
Marx recognizes that in the condition of alienation not only labour but art is also
alienated. Art itself becomes a commodity, and the relations of artistic
production reduce the position of the artistes to one of an exploited labourer.
Cultural labour becomes productive and unproductive simultaneously. What
creative freedom is the basis of creative labour, the lack of freedom is the initial
condition of cultural labour.
Page 13 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Sulabh 2009
some works on theatrical labour (Da Costa 2010, 2012; Rideout and Schneider
2012; Schimidt 2013
context for self-consumption and as part of a service and servitude, its new
meaning at the intersections of globalization cannot be undermined. Many
times, performances are taken out of their location and placed in a different
context. In that case, cultural labour may become part of a creative economy (p.
17) or render added affect in forms of a spectacle, as it happens in the case of
jhanki (tableau) from different regions on the eve of the Independence Day.
Sharmila Rege has used the term cultural labour to address the marginalization
of lavani and tamasa. Rege describes the cultural labour as those forms and
practices, which have roots in the social and material conditions of the Dalits
and bahujans (2002: 1040). She brings out the knotted problem of culture and
labour, and how widespread cultural practices of subaltern communities are
marginalized in the popular discourses because of its social and material
context. She criticized the postmodernist turn which emphasizes culture and
valorizes body. The labour concern has been so absent from the present cultural
Rege 2002:
1038). Rege argues that the performance traditions are neither just traditions of
resistance, nor are they just forms on which the bourgeois forms are
superimposed. They are at once emancipatory and imprisoning, containing and
resisting and, relatively, more or less affected and unaffected (in different
spheres) by capital... (2002: 1038). It can be argued that though the cultural
labour finds its strong manifestation in the language of performance, it is not
limited to the performative and expressive traditions; it is central to the ways
caste, and other hierarchies perform in Indian society. Thus, by analysing
cultural labour, one is not only engaging with the specific cultural enactments
but also its broader social and aesthetic structures.
With the rise of a bourgeois notion of aesthetics and civilization in the modern
period, the idea of culture acquired a new connotation of being a superior reality
antagonistic to acts of labour. As this trench widened, art and culture became
merely leisure activities that could be mobilized or controlled to gain symbolic
capital. At the same time, the understanding of artistic production began to be
established as being distinct from both manufacturing and menial labour
activities.
Dia Da Costa has flexibly used the nomenclature cultural labour to bring activist
theatre work within the orbit of labour historiography in her discussion on the
Buddhan theatre and its (p.18) creation of new values around the stigmatized
2012). She challenges the view, which asserts that capitalism has fully subsumed
artistic and cultural works. In her view, there is a need to analyse contested
Page 14 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
of the concept has been more in the context of the creative economy. Her focus
in India cannot undermine the question of caste and labour. It is because the
labouring class in India are also labouring castes. It is labouring caste and
labouring class together that form subaltern communities in this work. Cultural
labour is also important in the light of argument made by Ford Smith that
cultural practices in South Asia are not studied as space of labour (1997). There
is a need to see these cultural practices as spaces of labour. However, the
problem is more pertinent as cultural labour is neither considered
Jati (caste) pervades nearly all spheres of Indian social, cultural, and political
life. It is deeply rooted in social and cultural institutions in India. The caste
system claims to have a divine origin and gets its sanction from religious and
philosophical texts; it has its commanding presence in rituals and customs.
Beyond texts, caste is a living practice in Indian society with each caste having
its own customs, practices, and rituals. It has its own informal rules and
legislations, which runs parallel to democratic institutions. Some scholars would
even claim that Brahminical-inscribed body politic has become the cornerstone
of the modern democratic institutions in India (Aloysius 2010; Anderson 2012).
Page 15 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
society. Studies have shown how caste system still persists in Indian cities and
among Indian diaspora (Jodhka 2014).
From a performance point of view, the Indian caste system is about the politics
of controlling bodies and spaces. Caste determines where one can perform and
where one cannot. Performance in a way becomes enactment of power (often
caste honour). It opens up various spaces of claims and counter-claims. To
delineate the politics of performance, one not only needs to know what they
perform but also why they perform the way they do. The condition of
performativity becomes more important than the question of representation.
This is significant because the meanings of cultural labour are inseparable from
their day-to-day struggles (Rege 2002). Arguably, caste is the most and the least
performative category of Indian society, which allows perpetual performance of
body and space. It will cease to exist without performance. Politics of cultural
labour is an enactment of power through performance. And, performance is a
representation of the political and cultural claims of different caste groups.
While performance is dynamic, its performativity is constrained by the caste
system. Caste system maintains hierarchical relationships between various
forms of performance and an absolute control of bodies and languages. In this
way, the caste system not only erases the liberating power and the efficacy of
performance but also limits the power of performing body and performance
spaces. Between control and fantasy, caste performance creates what Scott
The caste system and the performance of the subaltern communities cannot be
viewed in isolation. Scholars have argued how ritual and performance play a
significant role in maintaining the caste system and bondage relations (Raheja
1988; Prakash 1986), where performance becomes what Limon calls an
Scott (1987), Limon (1994), and
Narayan (2001) have argued, such a performance can resist domination through
Page 16 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Mimesis has been the dominant mode of understanding the culture and
creativity of the subaltern communities in India (Menon 2006). Sanskritization
locates their culture and creativity in the light of upper caste ideology: the
performance becomes the mimesis of the upper caste culture (Dumont 1980;
Srinivas 1952). Subordinate classes are viewed as bereft of creative and cultural
expression. The cultural expression of upper castes becomes the basis of Indian
culture and ideology. In this understanding, the creativity of the subordinate
castes lies in replication, not in innovation (Menon 2006: xi). In other sides of
view, coming from Dalits and Bahujan scholars, subaltern communities are seen
as possessing an independent, autonomous culture that rejects any semblance to
the structures of Brahminical worldview.
While such performances are part of the caste system, they also stand against
the official religious cultures. They function as a repository of memories and
histories of a particular caste. Caste-based genealogy is based examples of this
practice. Unfortunately, the isolated places have the self and minds of the lower
orders. The performances, to an extent, resist homogenization of the religious
doctrinal unity. The subversive language and corporeality involved in such
performances make it difficult to accept by the puritanical religions.
N.B. Dirks (2001) warns anthropologists and others against essentializing caste
as a core of Indian society. Likewise, A.K. Ramanujan has also argued against
taking folklore as the culture of the low castes. The existing materials
nevertheless strongly suggest that the performance in significant ways is the
culture of the labouring lower castes. V.N. Rao (1985) argues that one should
have the courage to acknowledge the existence of jati-sanskruti in most forms of
our folk culture. Thereby, indicating that most of the folk performance genres in
has developed its own languages as well as narrative. They have developed their
Secondly, each jati has, over a period, developed its own language, its own
narrative tradition, dance, song, and (p.22) performance traditions. Each jati
has its own distinction and repository of culture and knowledge in this
segregated society. Mahendra Narayan Ram makes a similar point by saying
that, in the Mithila region of Bihar, most of the castes have their own gods,
goddesses, and ancestral spirits (2008: 33). Of course, there are folk
performances that have broken away from such caste lineages. Studies on the
folk culture of Telangana also support this claim by showing strong living
traditions of the Jambu Purana (caste-based epic traditions of Dalits) (Charlsey
and Kadekar 2004). It is true that lower caste and upper caste culture do not
Page 17 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Likewise, the Doms worship Mansaram and Chhechhanmal and Chamars follow
the fact that the epic stories are generally sung by people belonging to the lower
strata of society (1989: 62). One can argue that not only folk performances in
India follow the caste lines, but they also perform their corresponding castes in
their performances. It is not a religion, but caste works as the major
contradiction of folk society. Caste becomes the main motif in the folk
performance. In other words, the performance of cultural labour in India is
about jati-chetna (caste-consciousness). Folk (p.23) performance in India is a
genealogy of caste-based performance in the first order. Caste mediates their
languages, spaces, bodies, and materiality of performance. Ironically, caste
ghettos have preserved histories, genres, and embody skills of the castes in their
segregated spaces.
Page 18 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
(p.24) Verse
Samundramanthan was not just a play, it was the politics of representation. The
Cultural labour is the performance of labouring bodies in indirect but real sense.
It does not have the freedom to choose its context and performance. On the
contrary, the context plays a far more determinative role in deciding the terms of
performance. Rigidly hierarchical society cannot provide the active context for
creative articulation. The lack of freedom is the condition in which such
performance functions. Ambedkar discusses Balais caste of Maharashtra (2014:
215). He writes how in all Hindu marriages, balais were supposed to play music
before the procession and during the marriage. He emphasizes on the point that
how the balai caste was taught to render services without resentment but only
with passion. This rule for balais is not written in any text, but it is very much a
part of their cultural practices. While bodies and spaces embody and enact the
codes of performance, performance encodes bodies and spaces.
Cultural labour may abjure the feeling of labour alienation and hostility coming
from the actual material relationship. Despite the sense of alienation and
realization of consciousness, cultural labour as an affect may work to erase that
sense of alienation. Performers can perceive the social desire for culture not as
Klein and
Kunst 2012). Performers may feel a sense of desire that shrouds their
enslavement because of their artistic passion and emotional attachment. For that
matter, labouring bodies can exhaust their physical energy to the level of
corporeal bodies as it happens in many ritual contexts, for example, in the case
of vattakali of Adiyas and Paniyas community in Kerala (Menon 2015). However,
cultural labour can also work in an opposite way where it can usher passionate
inspiration to resist hierarchies in an impossible context. The performance of
Page 19 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Bhadri in Bihar and Icchakiamma in Tamil Nadu are such examples where
oppressed castes have affectively turned the tables of oppression.
Williams has discussed how in the construction of elitist notions of art and
culture, the culture was separated from agriculture and cultivation. Sharad Patil
(2007) brings this tension in the Indian aesthetic context by arguing how the
Unlike the dominant Rasa-aesthetic of north India, there was a great emphasis
on landscape in the Sangam poetics of south India. Tinai (often translated as
landscape or poetic situation) was widely used as a poetic category resembling
landscape or setting, which was a taxonomy of regions and feelings. Tinai as an
Page 20 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
notion of culture which was against agriculture. For Tagore, kristi (agriculture)
Sartori 2008: 3). Sartori pointed out
how sanskruti was understood to mean something like purification, the
grossly
material. In fact, Tagore had deep abhorrence for agriculture. Rabindranath
Tagore, the iconic literary and cultural figure, launched a campaign in the 1930s
to raise sanskruti (culture) to its (p.27) supremacy and to downgrade to
marginality its chief rival kristi. He writes,
There exist various skills for filling our stomachs and fulfilling the
and factories; literature in the field of his sanskruti, here occurs the
sanskruti of his own self, through it he raises himself in every respect, he
the sanskruti
erasure of land, materiality, and everyday life struggle. The notion of art and
culture is constructed on the erasure of land, materiality, and the labouring
body. He saw culture and agriculture had two different purposes, but in its
usage, culture was juxtaposed with agriculture to create supremacy of the
former. Agriculture was viewed as being bereft of culture, and so were the
people and communities associated with agricultural work. In India, it meant a
rejection of the culture of the popular masses who directly or indirectly depend
on land and agriculture.
Page 21 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
classes who are the real creators of culture. The habit of thinking of culture as
an independent activity from labour is ingrained (Patil 2006: 185). With the
influence of Aristotelian poetics in modern discourses, the thought that leisure is
an indispensable precondition to living a life of virtue (aesthetics is also one of
the attributes) got further strengthened. Culture practices that had a close
association with labouring activities denigrated further. It needs to be pointed
out that for many performers and participants, enactments are not purely leisure
activities, they are simultaneously leisure and labour activities.
labour. In the first case, performers are involved (p.28) in manual labour. In the
second case, the performers in their representation bring various aspects
including the materiality of manual labour. Representation of manual labour on
stage also becomes problematic. The existing prejudice towards these folk
performances is a result of deeper entrenched prejudice against manual labour.
Cultural labour brings body with all its materiality. To an extent, it denies the
performance of spirituality and immateriality. Even the spiritual experiences are
brought back to the level of materiality when it encounters the performance of
cultural labour. For example, Krishna, who became a divine figure during the
Bhakti period, transformed into a migrant labourer in his encounter with the
experiences of bidesia. It may also happen that labour itself becomes a spiritual
experience (in the context of Bhakti of the lower social order). As it happens in
the case of the songs and cultural practices of Bhakti poets from the lower
orders who exalted kayika (labour) to the spiritual experience. Once Brahminical
ideology based on purity and priesthood became a canon, the performance
cultures based on manual labour became a disgrace. The Natyasastra clearly
draws a connection creating a canon based on priesthood leading to the
relegation of the performance cultures of the lower classes.
Page 22 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Their sooty complexions, their coal-black cheeks, their haggard eyes, their
long-extended arms, their gaping mouths and their puerile attire, excite
disgust. For the screeching of the night-owl, the howling of the jackals, and
the barking of the dogs are harmony itself compared to their horrid yells
Mehtar [member of
the lowest-caste in the Hindu social order] who enters the stage with a
broomstick in his hand and cracks a few stupid jests which set the
audience in a roar of laughter. (emphasis added; quoted. in Chatterjee
2007: 120)
The haggard eyes and long, extended arms, and figurative extensions of the
performers are simply about jatra performers, but it symbolizes manual labour.
Along with manual labour, these performances are also viewed as lacking skills.
The Calcutta Review
underlying abhorrence of labouring bodies and their public enactments. The
presence of labouring bodies is graphically depicted by their sooty complexions,
their coal-black cheeks, their haggard eyes, their long, extended arms with a
broomstick in their hands. Who were/are the Mehtars? Mehtars and Doms were
the lowest of all castes in India, despised even by many untouchables. They are
traditionally engaged in sweeping, scavenging, and performing polluting and
defiling tasks as removing the carcases of dead animals and carrying dead
bodies of humans to burning ghats and arranging funeral pyres. This caste is
engaged with the body in its most polluting states. On the stage, they were
buffoons, tumblers, and dancers. With the emergence of the middle class, the
part of this project, the corrupt elements had to be erased, and popular forms
needed to be sanitized. Writing on the fate of the popular enactments, A.N.
Perumal, a Tamil historian, made a stingy remark on street performers that
needs to be quoted in length to render the politics of aesthetics. He writes,
The selfless services of erudite scholars have resurrected the Tamil drama
from the pits of negligence and withering. In the hands of (p.30) street
dancers drama became worse and worse losing its artistic value.
Throughout the night they shouted and hooted in the name of singing and
hopped and leapt instead of acting. In the morning they went from door to
door with stretched arms to get something to fill their belly. Their action on
stage and their behaviours on the streets were nothing but a great
disgrace to the noble art. Respectable people looked at them with utter
contempt. Something substantial had to be done to restore the stage from
the ugly hands of these street dancers. A few eminent men came forward
with great determination. They modernised the Tamil stage with high aims
and aspirations. Since their services were meritorious and highly valuable,
Page 23 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
39)
Hannah de Bruin (1999) has discussed the fate of kuttu (street) artists in
therrakuttu performance traditions in Tamil Nadu. How does the name
therrakuttu create a sense of disgust among the elites? Participation in art and
culture had come to be about social and cultural capital. It was not about the
class status and formation of new taste and sensibility based on Sanskrit drama
and Western plays. Drama used to be discussed not in the context of its actual
performance but that of dramatic literature. Writing on Gujarati theatre, H.N.
Bhavai was the only drama liked by the people, rather by the people of the low
been a shift in the way in which folk and regional performances were viewed and
denigrated, the attitudes continue to remain the same. The cultures, civilized,
and aestheticized notion of culture has created the notion of disgust which
becomes the point of differentiation. Elite scholars found their own justifications
without blaming their own incapability and caste background. Kapila Vatsayayan
(1997 [1974]
the British in the early nineteenth century was isolated from the artistic
but social gaps were already there. She regrets that because of the absence of
(p.31) by the twentieth century and what
could be seen of it was only a diluted, almost degenerated form of what was
known as Sadir in the South. It was like a shadow of a bygone
Vatsayayan 1997 [1974]: 8). For the marginalization of subaltern
performance traditions, both the nationalist and postcolonial scholars have
conveniently put the onus on colonial education and the modernist project.
However, what Perumal and Vatsayayan were arguing in the nineteenth century
can be found in the Natyasastra. In Origin of Natya, Bharata describes how
Natya was created,
Page 24 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Verse
the varna (used for four varnas) people. The verse clearly spells out the politics
and aesthetics of gramyadharma (rural performance) and its aims. I will argue
that there is not much difference between the anxiety felt by Bharatmuni and
Kapila Vatsayayan. For both of them, the theatre was a morality project, and
they aimed to raise popular theatre to the level of canonical aesthetics by
erasing the labouring bodies. There is no doubt that the threat perception and
anxiety of labouring bodies solidified with the colonial intervention and the
evident, this threat perception was not completely a modern phenomenon and
not just a local Indian phenomenon. (p.32) It appears that the phenomenon
started with the formation of the civic notion of art and culture and because of
disavowal of labouring activities in aesthetics.
of extremes of the cultural practices, one can lay bare a framework of discourse
within which any judicious questions must take place. The conceptual framework
particularly works in a carnivalesque context where inversion and grotesque
become a mode of resistance. However, the system of extremes in the Indian
context has graded extremities in which the grotesque as an aspect of
subversion stops working after a point.
discursive norms of impurity (both in the sense of dirt and mixed categories),
heterogeneity, masking, protuberant distension, disproportion, exorbitance,
clamour, decentred or eccentric arrangements, a focus on gaps, orifices, and
symbolic filth, materiality, and parody. They are the figures with
disproportionate corporeality, horrid laudability, and peripheral presence.
Stallybrass and White (1986) bring the notion of taboo-laden hierarchies that
produce the classical and the grotesque body. The grotesque body functions as a
perpetual enemy on which the classical body has to be persistently transfixed. In
carnivalesque frameworks, the grotesque libidinal bodies become the centre of
Page 25 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
(p.33) analysis. The frame though refers to economic interactions, but overall
libidinal shapes overshadow the labouring bodies. One can see the joker of
bidesia as a carnivalesque figure, but he is equally a figure of irony.
who mobilize civic and religious authorities against the performance cultures of
differentiation of high and low, and purity and impurity. While the carnivalesque
understanding of culture brings the language and materiality of labouring body,
it evades the question of labour. The understanding offers a ritualistic
abhorrence to dirt, blood, and lower bodily stratum were merely about taboo
and therefore, they wanted to maintain distance from the impure and profane
elements. Here, libidinal and labouring bodies cannot be viewed in isolation
from the centre; both were rather complementary to each other. I would rather
argue that the labouring body with its closeness to the body in its most polluting
states was the source of disgust.
approach that they were able to see satires but not the irony embedded in the
carnival.
traditions in the eyes of the puritanical elites? The example is not an exception.
In fact, the attitude needs to be understood (p.34) as a larger cultural
phenomenon that happens everywhere in the process of construction of what
Stallybrass and White (1986)
Page 26 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
the base, we should be able to explicate the key themes of the contested sites,
both time and space.
indecent songs were expunged, and new ideal songs were introduced to give a
class of women their cultural status. This has happened more or less in the field
of dance, theatre, and music as well. While getting trained in classical dance and
music acts as a cultural asset to the social elites and middle classes, the same
puts them into oblivion. For the former, it creates cultural capital, for another, it
becomes shame and denigration. There are many examples in traditional Indian
performances where male artistes who impersonate females not only become an
object of ridicule, in their locality, in the eyes of social elites but also a figure of
humiliation. They are physically and sexually harassed on an everyday basis on
streets, for being effeminate. There are many such examples where we can see
these culturally entrenched (p.35) paradoxes. While a famous Bhojpuri song,
become famous overnight. So, what is this politics of cultural accumulation that
makes one privileged and the other disadvantaged? Gopal Guru (2016) observes
a similar dilemma in the case of a leather cricket ball. He tried to understand
how a leather ball becomes special in the hand of an upper caste, while connotes
something else in the hands of the Dalits. Even the ball becomes precious, but
the person who is engaged in making the ball remain denigrated. Ironically, the
real value of cultural labour in Indian society lies in the devaluation of its
artistes and performers, often in forms of shame, humiliation, and exploitation.
However, this experience cannot be generalized. This value can be subverted
where the value can be viewed as a cultural capital of the subaltern
communities. It is true that social elites try to devalue the immense contribution
of artistes, but they generally get respect from their own communities. Hasan
and Kalapura (2009) have shown this connection in the context of Dalit and
subaltern performances in Bihar. They have observed that performers are
viewed differently in different social classes.
Page 27 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
coming from lineage. But it is the body that gives it a recognition of capital; the
body which already is part of a particular community. In the case of cultural
The function of cultural labour is the reverse of cultural capital. It can also be
asserted that one part of cultural capital is constructed through the production
of cultural labour. But cultural labour is much broader than the overall spheres
of cultural capital as discussed by Bourdieu. Another dimension of cultural
capital can be understood regarding the mobility of the participants. Cultural
capital as an asset gives social mobility to its participants. Cultural labour has an
immense potential of mobilization but generally, it tends to enslave its
participants. The use of cultural labour and its potential mobility depends on the
ideology employed. Of course, it has two different meanings for the elite class
and the subaltern communities. Despite contributing enormous cultural labour,
it may be possible that its value is not recognized. There are cases where the
acquired cultural labour may disempower the individual and the collective.
There are also examples where the artistes are appreciated for their skills and
have a special status in their own society. But in that case, cultural labour does
not match the disseminative power of cultural capital and its relationship with
recognized unless they do not use the cultural capital provided by the owners of
the cultural capital. Despite his popularity, Bhikhari Thakur could not get
recognition for his work until he was discovered by Jagadish Chandra Mathur.
(p.37)
Page 28 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Bourdieu has pointed out that habitus is central to cultural capital. Coming from
segregated colonies, performers of cultural labour face all sorts of
discrimination because of their habitus association. Their primary cultural
kis basti ka hai (which slum he/
she belongs to). So cultural labour is not simply an idea of folk performance, it is
also performed on an everyday basis. Cultural labour is directly related to
cultural capital, it works as an institution that gives access and legitimacy to its
performers. Once individuals or groups are part of that cultural labour, there is a
chance that their cultural capital in either way is going to be impacted. The
devaluation of cultural labour is based on the notion of being socially superior to
the lower castes.
becomes a canon that manual labour becomes a disgrace but the very
foundation of the principle is based on its hostility to manual labour. This
relationship between priesthood and manual labour is primarily maintained
through cultural practices in most of the societies. This work brings forth the
politics and aesthetics of Indian subaltern performances and their affective
presence in forms of cultural labour in the Indian, caste-based society.
Geographies of Performance
In most of the cases, folk performances are region-specific performance
traditions in India and South Asia. They hold topographic (p.38) phenomenon
of both natural histories and local histories. The question of local and region, as
well as place and landscape, becomes vital in their construction. In a reciprocal
relationship, the performances produce region, but they also get produced
through the regions. While I understand the regional sensitivity and regional
expressions closely associated with this performance, some key features of the
performances go beyond local and regional particularities. G. Aloysius brings
this point to the fore by arguing that the very core of the social construction of
labour that primarily lies at the heart and root of the production and
Aloysius 2013: 19)
If the region is about differentiating principle, it can also be discussed in its
similarities with other regions. Regional particularities often undermine this
connection. Bihar and Telangana are two regions and states apart, but their
Page 29 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
experiences and historical formation bring them together. What is special about
the performance is that we can see a pattern of aesthetics and a pattern of
marginality across the regions.
Aloysius 2013: 31). Aloysius points out that even while the researcher
is engaged with a single region, there are similar and several other regions
differentiated according to the same criteria moving in the background. This
reading offers a conceptual framework to see cultural labour as a trans-regional
and trans-cultural category based on similar expressions and experiences. And,
if the region is structured by the same factors and ideology, then it should
theoretically be possible to extend such differentiation of regions as a principle
to an entire area (Aloysius 2013: 31).
Bihar and Telangana as regions may vary geographically, but they share some
regions have a minimal interface (p.39) with direct colonialism. Both regions
below the poverty line, and half of them are agricultural labourers (Census of
India 2011). Agricultural labourers, small farmers, and casual workers constitute
a significant section of the poor. Most of them represent not only the lower class
but also the Dalits and lower caste section of the society. These facts are crucial
in this study, as these are the contexts in which the performance of cultural
labour works. Pauperization of the small peasantry and their migration to cities
as the workforce have also influenced the performance in a significant way.
The fieldwork for this research has been mostly conducted in four districts of
Bihar, namely Patna, Nalanda, Vaishali, and Jahanabad in addition to the city of
Hyderabad and its suburban areas. At present, Bihar has the third largest
population in the country and is the most impoverished state in India with a per
per cent of the population of Bihar depends upon agriculture, and 32 per cent of
Page 30 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
the total population of the state lives below the poverty line (Census of India
2011). From the colonial period to the present, Bihar continues to be the biggest
supplier of the cheapest labourers across India. It also has the lowest literacy
rate in India. According to the 2011 Census, the total literacy rate was 61.8 per
cent. Among the lower-caste communities, this percentage would not be more
than 30 per cent (Census of India 2011). Most people belonging to lower castes
are engaged in agricultural work, (p.40) with the Backward Castes as middle
and small peasants and the Dalits as the landless agricultural labourers and
service providers. Both small peasants and agricultural labourers seasonally
migrate to cities as unskilled labourers. With the assertion of Dalits and the
lower castes in the public sphere, the state witnessed brutal caste conflicts
between the dominant and lower castes. The situation in the Telangana region in
Andhra Pradesh is more or less similar.
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Marxism and Literature (1977) and various essays on culture provides a core
methodological framework for this work. Though Sharad Patil (2007) has not
referred to the works of Williams, their approach to cultural production and
aesthetic formations show profound similarities. Two crucial key terms provide
methodological tools for this analysis: affect/aesthetics and performativity or
what Mojca Puncer (2011: 409) calls the affective performativity. He argues that,
other members of their species through teaching, imitation, and other forms of
(p.42)
The residual, by definition, has been effectively formed in the past, but it is
still active in the cultural process, not only and often not at all as an
element of the present. Thus, certain experiences, meanings and values
which cannot be expressed or substantially verified in terms of the
the fixity of the modern, traditional, and contemporary. Williams (1977) was of
the view that while the residual can be incorporated, there is something
inherently oppositional counter-hegemonic, and indeed threatening in its very
Page 32 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
the centre of performance which connects and cuts across regions and cultures
in Indian caste-based society, I have tried to offer a conceptual framework that
has the potential to restructure its own materials and methods. Cultural labour
is the enactments of labouring bodies. Existing studies have focused on relations
between produced institutions, formations, (p.43) and experiences. Cultural
labour, in a strict sense, is neither ideology nor a structure, rather it can be
concerned with meaning and values as lived and felt the force. Cultural labour
as structures of feeling brings affective elements of consciousness and
relationships: not feeling against thought, but thought of feeling as felt value
and taking feelings as thoughts. It creates a force of encounter in which cultural
labour, which appears to be regressive, may become a transformative force.
Social theorists have examined social institutions and their analysis based on
relations between produced institutions, formations, and experiences. In this
In
a cultural context, he suggests us to present them in active reading. The
challenge is how to present caste-based performances in its manifestation with
an affective presence. Williams complicates the idea of the hegemonic and
shows us potential to think about counter-hegemony as an alternative hegemony.
approach and gives us an initial frame to grasp some of these nuances in the
Indian context.
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Theron Schmidt (2013) offers schemata to understand the two kinds of work.
The first type of work, as he suggests, is just
anonymous form of capital. He refers to Marx who says that this is the site of the
form, circulating independently, and defined precisely by its abstraction from the
labour that went into it (2013: 15). He discusses the third kind of work, that is,
the work of art or performance that consists of the ordinary hidden labour that
goes (p.45) into producing it. He suggests two primary ways in which the
relationship between theatre, performance, and labour take place in
Page 34 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
The works of Limon and Lombardi Satriani on folklore offer a specific approach
to engage with the particular nature of the folk performance. I take the cultural
practices lying in the field of contestations where every class and caste wants to
appropriate the cultural materials in their own ways. Located in local and
Satriani
1974
and behaviour visible even today in the folk world are substantially different
from those of the dominant class. It is because both the economy and culture to
Limon (1983) challenges two
character is in some way inherently opposed to the dominant social order. And
Madison 2005
approaches have proved useful and engaging for the study of marginalized
cultures and communities. Both of them have placed ethics of representation at
the centre of their strategy. The critical ethnography offers a space to reflect,
revisit, rethink, rearrange, and analyse our own position to renew the
scholarship for a better dialogue.
visceral presence, performativity (the way people present themselves and make
meaning of their lives), and theatricality and corporeality (embodied
Page 35 of 40
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press,
Les lettres ont paru dans des journaux pendant le printemps de 1908, après une
excursion au Canada faite pendant l’automne de 1907. Elles sont réimprimées
sans modification.
LA ROUTE DE QUÉBEC.
UN PEUPLE CHEZ LUI.
CITÉS ET ESPACES.
JOURNAUX ET DÉMOCRATIE.
LE TRAVAIL.
LES VILLES FORTUNÉES.
DES MONTAGNES ET LE PACIFIQUE.
UNE CONCLUSION.
LA ROUTE DE QUÉBEC
1907