You are on page 1of 12

08/07/2018 Topics I and II - Introduction, Corporate Personality and Limited Liability: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations

rporations Law

Topics I and II - Introduc on, Corporate Personality and


Limited Liability
Due No due date Points 10 Questions 10 Time Limit None
Allowed Attempts 10

Take the Quiz Again

A empt History
Attempt Time Score
LATEST Attempt 1 6 minutes 8 out of 10

Score for this attempt: 8 out of 10


Submitted Jul 8 at 8:45
This attempt took 6 minutes.

Question 1 0 / 1 pts

1. Members of any company registered under the Corporations Act in


Australia have the benefit of limited liability.

You Answered
True

orrect Answer False

Question 2 1 / 1 pts

The liability of members of an unlimited company is contingent upon the


company being wound up and the assets of the company being inadequate
to satisfy its liabilities

Correct!
True

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/35106 1/4
08/07/2018 Topics I and II - Introduction, Corporate Personality and Limited Liability: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

False

Question 3 1 / 1 pts

A single shareholder of a registered proprietary company in Australia can


have the benefit of limited liability even when he or she is also the sole
director of the company.

Correct! True

False

Question 4 1 / 1 pts

According to Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd, it is not possible for a major
shareholder to contract with the corporation under an employment contract.

True

Correct! False

Question 5 1 / 1 pts

In Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne, the plaintiff was successful in its action to
pierce the corporate veil, on the basis that Horne had intentionally set up a
new corporation to avoid a restrictive covenant in his contract of service.

Correct! True

False

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/35106 2/4
08/07/2018 Topics I and II - Introduction, Corporate Personality and Limited Liability: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

Question 6 0 / 1 pts

In Smith Stone and Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corporation, the court was
prepared to pierce the corporate veil because the case involved a wholly-
owned subsidiary in a corporate group.

You Answered True

orrect Answer False

Question 7 1 / 1 pts

Australian public companies are required to have at least 3 directors and


proprietary companies are required to have at least 2 directors.

True

Correct!
False

Question 8 1 / 1 pts

The so-called “Bubble Act” was the first UK statute to grant full corporate
status to joint-stock companies

True

Correct!
False

Question 9 1 / 1 pts

In Australia all registered public companies are listed on the Australian


Securities Exchange.

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/35106 3/4
08/07/2018 Topics I and II - Introduction, Corporate Personality and Limited Liability: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

True

Correct! False

Question 10 1 / 1 pts

A small business such as a hairdressing salon can be conducted through the


form of a no liability company.

True

Correct! False

Quiz Score: 8 out of 10

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/35106 4/4
08/07/2018 Topic III Corporate Constitution Quiz: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

Topic III Corporate Cons tu on Quiz


Due No due date Points 10 Questions 10 Time Limit 10 Minutes
Allowed Attempts 2

A empt History
Attempt Time Score
KEPT Attempt 2 6 minutes 9 out of 10

LATEST Attempt 2 6 minutes 9 out of 10

Attempt 1 6 minutes 7 out of 10

Score for this attempt: 9 out of 10


Submitted Jul 8 at 8:52
This attempt took 6 minutes.

Question 1 1 / 1 pts

The law strictly prohibits the imposition of any requirement additional to the
passing of a special resolution by the general meeting, in order to alter a
company’s constitution

True

Correct!
False

Correct

Correct

Question 2 1 / 1 pts

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34986 1/4
08/07/2018 Topic III Corporate Constitution Quiz: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

A company’s constitution and any replaceable rules have the effect as a


contract between a member and each director

True

Correct! False

False

Question 3 1 / 1 pts

The constitution of a public company can exclude the application of section


203D of the Corporations Act, which provides that a ‘public company may by
resolution remove a director from office’

True

Correct! False

Question 4 1 / 1 pts

The majority in the High Court decision of Gambotto v WCP Ltd decided that
an amendment to a company’s constitution to allow the expropriation or
compulsory acquisition of shares would be valid if it is for a proper purpose or
will not operate oppressively in relation to minority shareholders.

True

Correct! False

Question 5 1 / 1 pts

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34986 2/4
08/07/2018 Topic III Corporate Constitution Quiz: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

A member can bring an action to enforce all rights under a statutory contract
given to the member in that capacity

Correct!
True

False

Question 6 1 / 1 pts

A provision in a company’s constitution conferring rights otherwise than in the


capacity as a member are never enforceable at law

True

Correct!
False

Question 7 1 / 1 pts

In Read v Astoria Garage (Streatham) Ltd, the plaintiff managing director


failed in his allegation of breach of contract, because the Court of Appeal
held that, as a matter of construction, his contract of employment
incorporated Article 68 of the UK Companies legislation, entitling the
shareholders in general meeting to terminate his employment.

Correct!
True

False

Question 8 0 / 1 pts

An alteration to the articles may result in an alteration to the terms of a


special outside contract, provided that this is the intention of the parties.

orrect Answer True

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34986 3/4
08/07/2018 Topic III Corporate Constitution Quiz: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

You Answered False

Incorrect. See Bailey's case.

Question 9 1 / 1 pts

A provision in the constitution requiring membership disputes to be arbitrated


is not part of the statutory contract.

True

Correct! False

Question 10 1 / 1 pts

According to Shindler v Northern Raincoat Co Ltd, the board does not have
the power to enter into fixed term employment contracts.

True

Correct! False

Quiz Score: 9 out of 10

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34986 4/4
08/07/2018 Topic IV Corporate Organs: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

Topic IV Corporate Organs


Due No due date Points 10 Questions 10 Time Limit 15 Minutes
Allowed Attempts 2

A empt History
Attempt Time Score
KEPT Attempt 2 5 minutes 7 out of 10

LATEST Attempt 2 5 minutes 7 out of 10

Attempt 1 10 minutes 4 out of 10

Score for this attempt: 7 out of 10


Submitted Jul 8 at 9:33
This attempt took 5 minutes.

Question 1 0 / 1 pts

For every registered public company, the power to manage the business of
the company is vested in the Board of Directors.

You Answered True

Incorrect. Matter for the statutory contract.

orrect Answer False

Question 2 1 / 1 pts

The decision in Re Totex-Adon demonstrated that only the shareholders or


directors of a company may convene a general meeting

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34988 1/4
08/07/2018 Topic IV Corporate Organs: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

True

Correct! False

Question 3 1 / 1 pts

The decision in Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v


Cuninghame is based on a theory that views directors as the agents of
individual shareholders.

True

Correct! False

Question 4 1 / 1 pts

Cordiant Communications (Aust) Pty Ltd v Communication Group Holdings


Pty Ltd confirms that s 1322 Corporations Act can only be used to cure
procedural, and not substantive, irregularities.

Correct! True

False

Question 5 1 / 1 pts

100 members have a right, not only to request that the directors call a
general meeting under s 249D, but also to call a meeting directly under s
249F.

True

Correct! False

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34988 2/4
08/07/2018 Topic IV Corporate Organs: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

Question 6 0 / 1 pts

Members of a public company have an absolute right to appoint a proxy, but


members of a proprietary company have no absolute right to appoint a proxy.

orrect Answer True

You Answered False

Question 7 1 / 1 pts

The relevant standard for a notice of meeting is that it must be


comprehensible to a reasonably careful business person reading the
document.

True

Correct!
False

Question 8 1 / 1 pts

Under the Corporations Act, a company can never be appointed as a director


of another company?

Correct!
True

False

Question 9 0 / 1 pts

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34988 3/4
08/07/2018 Topic IV Corporate Organs: 2018 Winter Main - LAWS2014 /5014 Corporations Law

Under s 247A Corporations Act, a court is likely to make an order authorising


a member of a company to inspect its books, even though that member may
be motivated by a wish to obtain confidential information for the benefit of
one of the company’s competitors.

You Answered True

orrect Answer False

Question 10 1 / 1 pts

Under the organic theory of corporate law, a company is bound by the acts of
its board of directors because those acts are treated as acts of the company
itself.

Correct! True

False

Quiz Score: 7 out of 10

https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/9598/quizzes/34988 4/4

You might also like