Alena Ivanovna is a pawnbroker, known for her exploitation of the poor and her

harsh treatment of others. She represents the oppressive and corrupt aspects of
society, profiting from the desperation of those around her.

Marmeladov, on the other hand, is a deeply troubled and morally conflicted

character. He is an alcoholic, often found drowning his sorrows in drink due to his
inability to provide for his family. Despite his flaws, Marmeladov displays moments of
genuine remorse and tries to seek redemption for his actions.

If only one of them could live, it could be argued that Marmeladov's life holds more
potential for positive change. His redemption arc, however fraught with setbacks,
suggests the possibility of growth and transformation. Conversely, Alena Ivanovna's
continued existence perpetuates a cycle of exploitation and cruelty.

Porfiry Petrovich, the chief investigator in "Crime and Punishment," demonstrates a

keen understanding of human psychology and employs various tactics to manipulate
and elicit confessions from suspects. Throughout the novel, he carefully observes
Raskolnikov's behavior and engages him in conversations designed to unsettle him
and provoke a confession.

However, whether Porfiry Petrovich is certain that Raskolnikov is the murderer is

open to interpretation. On one hand, he presents compelling evidence and theories
implicating Raskolnikov, demonstrating a deep understanding of the case. He also
strategically challenges Raskolnikov's justifications and beliefs, attempting to break
down his defenses and extract a confession.

On the other hand, Porfiry Petrovich also demonstrates a degree of ambiguity in his
interactions with Raskolnikov. He employs psychological tactics and manipulation to
unsettle Raskolnikov, suggesting that he may be testing the waters or attempting to
push Raskolnikov into confessing. Additionally, Porfiry Petrovich acknowledges the
complexity of human nature and the intricacies of the case, leaving room for doubt
about his absolute certainty regarding Raskolnikov's guilt.

Ultimately, whether Porfiry Petrovich is truly certain of Raskolnikov's guilt is left

unresolved in the novel. His character adds to the tension and ambiguity surrounding
Raskolnikov's moral dilemma, leaving readers to ponder the nature of guilt, justice,
and redemption.