ARDEN UNIVERSITY

MBA (Graduate) Level 7

BUS7015

Financial Management

stu184175

Raymond Cox

4850
SECTION A: QUESTION 1

Financial Analysis of Synopsys, Cadence, and CEVA: A Comprehensive Examination

To appraise the performance of Synopsys, Cadence and CEVA with regard to its financial
position, a careful analysis using several ratios becomes important. Ratios offer great
opportunities not only to expand but also gain profits, stay on the market, and master
business. The two key ratios that we will pinpoint in this line of analysis are growth rates,
price ratio, operating returns and profit margins from the following categories— financial
conditions including management efficiency. Through comparison of these ratios in the years
2021, 2020 respectively, enough understanding on how financials have been forming within
the companies among all those discussed can be achieved.

Growth Rates

Sales Growth Rate

The sales growth rate is a critical metric that indicates the expansion of a company's
revenue over time (Shad, 2023). Synopsys, with a remarkable sales growth rate of 46.8%,
62.2%, and 23.7% in 2022, 2021, and 2020 respectively, has demonstrated consistent and
robust revenue generation. In contrast, Cadence and CEVA have also shown commendable
growth, with Cadence experiencing a growth rate of 45.2%, 62.2%, and 26.2%, and CEVA
registering growth rates of 53.7%, 61.2%, and 47.8% in the same period. These growth rates
showcase the industry's overall health and the companies' ability to adapt and capture
market opportunities.

Income Growth Rate

Examining the income growth rate provides insights into the companies' ability to manage
costs and enhance profitability (Stobierski, 2020). Synopsys has maintained a steady income
growth rate of 23.1%, 79.3%, and 56.6% in 2022, 2021, and 2020, indicating effective cost
management and profitability. Cadence and CEVA also display robust income growth, with
Cadence at 33.1%, 79.3%, and 56.6%, and CEVA at 33.1%, 79.3%, and 36.6%. These
figures suggest that all three companies have successfully translated their sales growth into
increased profitability.

Price Ratios
Price/Sales Ratio

The price/sales ratio is a valuation metric that reflects the market's expectations for a
company's future growth (Stobierski, 2020). Synopsys, with a price/sales ratio of 3.66, 2.78,
and 1.97 in 2022, 2021, and 2020, commands a premium in the market. Cadence follows
closely with ratios of 3.66, 2.47, and 2.99, indicating a consistent market valuation. CEVA,
although slightly lower, maintains competitive ratios of 3.63, 3.23, and 2.96. These ratios
imply that investors have confidence in the growth potential of all three companies.

Price/Book Value

The price/book value ratio provides insights into a company's market value in relation to its
book value (Misamore, 2017). Synopsys, with ratios of 4.02, 5.01, and 2.99, suggests that the
market values the company's assets and earnings potential. Cadence exhibits a similar trend
with ratios of 4.02, 1.97, and 1.09, while CEVA follows with ratios of 4.20, 3.76, and 2.99.
These figures indicate the market's perception of the companies' intrinsic value and growth
prospects.

Investment Returns

Return on Equity (ROE)

ROE is a critical metric that assesses a company's ability to generate profits from
shareholders' equity (Stobierski, 2020). Synopsys, with an ROE of 21.7%, 30.9%, and 25.9%
in 2022, 2021, and 2020, demonstrates consistent and solid returns for shareholders.
Cadence and CEVA also exhibit strong ROE figures, with Cadence at 21.7%, 37.9%, and
25.9%, and CEVA at 22.7%, 33.9%, and 25.7%. These figures signify efficient utilization of
shareholders' funds to generate profits.

Return on Assets (ROA)

ROA measures a company's ability to generate profits from its assets. Synopsys, Cadence,
and CEVA consistently show strong ROA figures of 15.9%, 24.3%, and 20.7%, 12.9%,
24.3%, and 19.7%, and 18.9%, 25.3%, and 21.7%, respectively. These results indicate
effective asset utilization and operational efficiency across the board.
Profit Margins

Net Profit Margin

Net profit margin gauges a company's efficiency in converting revenue into profits.
Synopsys, with net profit margins of 23.7%, 30.1%, and 27.3%, demonstrates a consistent
ability to convert a significant portion of its revenue into profits. Cadence and CEVA also
exhibit strong net profit margins, with Cadence at 24.7%, 30.1%, and 28.3%, and CEVA at
21.7%, 31.1%, and 24.3%. These figures highlight effective cost management and
operational efficiency.

Gross Margin

The gross margin represents the percentage of revenue retained after deducting the cost of
goods sold. Synopsys maintains high gross margins of 94.4%, 88.4%, and 84.2%, reflecting
strong pricing power and cost control. Cadence and CEVA also exhibit healthy gross
margins, with Cadence at 84.4%, 81.4%, and 83.2%, and CEVA at 84.4%, 81.4%, and
80.2%. These margins indicate the companies' ability to maintain profitability at the
production level.

Financial Conditions

Debt/Equity Ratio

The debt/equity ratio assesses a company's financial leverage. Synopsys, with ratios of
39.1%, 26.5%, and 24.7%, has gradually increased its reliance on debt. Cadence and CEVA
also show an upward trend, with Cadence at 49.1%, 36.5%, and 25.7%, and CEVA at
49.1%, 36.5%, and 34.7%. While these ratios indicate increased leverage, it's essential to
evaluate how the companies are utilizing the borrowed funds for growth and operational
efficiency.

Current Ratio

The current ratio measures a company's ability to cover its short-term liabilities with its short-
term assets. Synopsys, Cadence, and CEVA consistently maintain healthy current ratios of
3.5, 3.8, and 4.4, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6, and 3.52, 3.87, and 4.45, respectively. These figures
suggest that all three companies have sufficient short-term assets to cover their obligations,
ensuring liquidity and financial stability.

Management Efficiency

Income/Employee

Income per employee provides insights into the efficiency of a company's workforce in
generating revenue. Synopsys, with income/employee figures of 32,271.00, 48,949.00, and
38,148.00, indicates consistent employee productivity. Cadence and CEVA also display
efficiency in utilizing human capital, with Cadence at 33,271.00, 44,949.00, and 32,148.00,
and CEVA at 41,271.00, 39,949.00, and 29,148.00. These figures underscore the
companies' ability to generate income with optimal staffing levels.

Asset Turnover

Asset turnover measures how efficiently a company utilizes its assets to generate revenue.
Synopsys, Cadence, and CEVA maintain asset turnover ratios of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.8, 0.5, 0.7,
and 0.6, and 0.79, 0.81, and 0.89, respectively. These ratios indicate effective asset
utilization, ensuring that the companies are efficiently deploying their resources to generate
sales.

Comparison and Overall Ranking

In terms of synthesizing the results, it is clear that all three companies Synopsys Cadence
and CEVA have significant financial aspects in each parameter. Synopsys has competitive
advantage due to constant growth rates, profitability margins and effective use of assets.
Cadence trails closely on strong growth and profitability numbers, while CEVA shows high
rate of expansion along with smart financial control.

Illustrative graphics such as charts and graphs enhance the comparative analysis of these
firms in terms of their performance over a periodof three years. It seems that Synopsys is the
leader in terms of growth, profits and efficiency taking first place. Although lagging a bit,
Cadence and CEVA display strengths in different venues that keep them competitive within
the semiconductor industry.
In sum, a thorough analysis of Synopsys, Cadence and CEVA using different financial ratios
would reveal delicate aspects related to their performance and capital condition. This
assessment together with the use of graphs aids in obtaining a comprehensive overview of
strengths and opportunities for companies weaknesses. Based on the peculiarities and
competitive advantages of each company, investors and stakeholders can make decisions
that are based upon this analysis.

1.2 Identifying the Best and Most Poorly Performing Companies: Investment
Opportunities and Recommendations

The detailed analysis of the financial ratios and their urgent ranking makes Synopsys appear
as a winner company holding first place among all indicators. Second, when compared to
Synpsoys and Cadence, CEVA seems the weakest in terms of several critical factors. Let us
now analyse Synopsys as a positive investment opportunity, and furthermore we propose for
better financial positioning CEVA.

The company’s unfailing leadership is largely ascribed to its significant growth rates, firm
profit margins and effective management of assets and employees. With such a high sales
and income growth rate, coupled with good return on equity numberand an impressive asset
base ROA as wells Asahi is very clearly perceivedthe company plan its business model to
strategically focused. As such, the positive price/sales and price/book value ratios also
indicate investors’ trust in Synopsys\' future development opportunities.

1.2.1.1 Positive Investment Opportunity

Potential investors searching for a reliable and stable investment would find Synopsys
attractive. The success of the company is based on its steady growth, profitability, and
effective resource utilization that assures confidence in enduring market volatility. Strong
liquidity can be implied by the high current ratio as it reduces short-term financial distress
due to risk (Canina and Carvell, 2008). Second, the moderate level of debt/equity ratio does
reflect a balanced approach to using leverage as drivers for growth without undermining
financial stability.
1.Sustaining and improving performance.

While Synopsys is presently succeeding across numerous financial indices, going forward
rises in the front can by no means be dismissed to stumble upon its number of personality.
Instead, the firm should continue to develop its sustaining innovation and research and
development activities in order to remain abreast with technological advancements within
this sector of semiconductor. Further, venturing into strategic alliances and widening the
scope of market coverage will augment Revenues generated by Synopsys. Keeping debt
levels under control as well as cost optimization will enable sustained profitability.

CEVA may be showing great rates of growth in some instances, but loses points for
profitability margins and returns to equity. The company’s disappointing performance in the
three metrics of net profit margin, ROE and ROA suggest that difficulties may exist to
convert sales growth into stable profits. Identifying the factors underlying these numbers is of
immense significance in locating processes that require refinement and releasing CEVA’s
hidden performance.

1.2.1 Challenges and Reasons for Underperformance

A major cause of the company CEVA having lower profitability margins may be an increase
in its operating expenses or poor cost management. The debt/equity ratio, despite remaining
within a manageable range, has demonstrated an increasing trend that may signal the
influence of the financial leverage. Additionally, the low gross margin relative to industry
peers shows some need for cost reductions in production procedure.

1.2. Recommendation for Improvement of Financial Performance

To enhance CEVA’s financial performance, a complex solution is required. Initially, an in-

depth cost analysis should be undertaken to establish where improvements can be made as
regards operational efficiency. Efficient production process and good terms with the
suppliers may lead to a higher gross margin. Moreover, CEVA needs to consider its debt
utilization strategy and whether the rise in leverage corresponds with strategic growth plans.

Investing in research and development to improve product offerings, as well as

competitiveness is an essential aspect for sustained growth. Establishing strong
relationships with the current clients and attracting new ones through targeted marketing
activities may increase sales. Finally, evaluation of the employee’s productivity and
coordination between staff organization structure and business needs will provide efficient
use resources.

1.2.3 CONCLUSION

Finally, Synopsys is the most successful company with a positive investment opportunity
because of its steady growth, profitability moveover strong financials. However, CEVA
shows promising growth but is facing problems in achieving profitability margin returns. To
convert to a more attractive investment option, CEVA dealing with cost management,
production process optimization and debt strategy is critical. These measures can set a path
for better results in terms of performance, thereby strengthening CEVA’s relative position on
the semiconductor market. Based on the strengths and areas of improvement for each
company that investors have gained insights into, they will be able to make informed
investments decisions.

SECTION A: QUESTION 2

HOW TECHNOLOGY HAS IMPACTED THE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING INDUSTRY

The emergence of technology has caused a drastic change in the finance and accounting
sphere, which is most evident through blockchain (Abdennadher et al., 2021). As an
accounting technology, blockchain has proven to be a disruptor that changes the paradigm
of transacting and recording asset ownership as well maintaining ledgers. In accounting
where the focus has been hitherto in measuring and reporting financial results blockchain
comes as a game changer unrivaled clarity on asset ownership that transforms operations.
This technology should have significant savings in ledger holding and reconciliation
procedures; the new level of assurance for an account person concerning asset ownership,
as well as history itself.

The technological change reaches beyond cost-reduction implications, in redefining the role
of an accountant. Automation trends are remodeling transactional-level accounting tasks,
including machine learning features. By replacing bookkeeping and reconciliation work,
blockchain may create challenges to some areas of accounting while simultaneously
strengthening value-added accoun t roles. For the case of due diligence in mergers and
acquisitions, blockchain distributed consensus speeds up processes allowing for more time
by accountants to serve as advisors delivering insightful advice on strategic matters that
assure critical decision-making.

With the emergence of technology through blockchain, what are some features that greatly
influence its adoption in application within finance and accounts? The uniqueness of
Blockchain stems from its features in transparency, security and distributed control; this is
what differentiates it from traditional means. These characteristics transform the
conventional concepts of perimeter audits, making confirmations unnecessary and triggering
a major revolution on ways that external audit are done. Combining with the data analytics,
blockchain enables auditors to focus their skills on questions such as what has been
recorded and how transactions have been categorized. The technology serves as a catalyst;
thereby, it empowers the auditors to offer more in-depth analyses and also improves its
services’ overall value.

On a larger scale, how will blockchain help the finance and accounting profession lead on
this frontier and what are the necessary skills for future success? The accountancy
profession, a field renowned for its mastery over record keeping and standards setting will
help in leading the integration of blockchain into the financial system. It involves not only the
standardization and optimization of blockchain, but also the formation of regulations and
standards – a formidable challenge that can be addressed by industry leaders and bodies.
Additionally, accountants play a critical role as advisors helping firms considering the
adoption of blockchain, providing information on cost-benefit analysis and spotting
opportunities in this developing technological environment. The advancement of the industry
redefines accountants’ skill set. Even though reconciliations may lose their weight, the skills
in technology and advisory services as well as other value-added activities are becoming
increasingly significant. The changing environment requires accountants to develop
knowledge of the core properties and implementation of blockchain allowing them to advise
on adoption while acting as mediators between business stakeholders and technology
engineers. This move is evidenced by the addition of topics such as blockchain in syllabuses
for professional qualifications, including ICAEW’s ACA qualification highlighting preparation
for future accountants.

HOW THE TECHNOLOGY DIFFERS FROM THE FAMILIAR, AND HOW THESE
FEATURES DRIVE THE POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF BLOCKCHAIN
Blockchain is fundamentally dissimilar to traditional systems of finance in its set of features
that involve transparency, security and decentralization (Javaid et al., 2022). Invoking on the
pioneer of ledgers, blockchain uses a‘ decentralized network’ records which are hosted
across nodes making it resistant to interference and fraud. There is transparency because all
transactions are visible in real-time to all participants ensuring trust. The cryptographic
security used in the blockchain guarantees indelibleness of recorded transactions, implying
that it is not possible to change historical data. By leaving the limits of dark, centralized
hybrid systems this opens a myriad of opportunities to use it in finance or accounting for
instance.

One of the biggest issues related to financial systems for many years was its lacking trust.
However, blockchain solves this with transparency being at its heart The fact that the
blockchain does not allow any changes and is shared by all participants makes it
unnecessary to have intermediaries as well entitles them with trust. This has a great impact
on sectors like auditing, which is streamlined by technology that makes transaction details
easily available and eliminates the need for confirmations. Further, the security properties of
blockchain and its decentralized nature make it a perfect application for programs
demanding high data assurance including demarcation sensitive economic assets. The
applications have a wider scope even into areas considered elusive or unreliable in
measuring that data which at tabled, can now be reliably valued for the company.

Decentralization and cryptography ensure that the potential applications of block chain
technology extend beyond conventional financial transactions. Blockchain enables smart
contracts, or self-executing ‘if this then that’ models of the terms written directly into code.
These contracts automatically bind and implement agreements, eliminating the need for
mediation alongside lowering fraud risks. Indeed, the distinctive characteristics of blockchain
change our perception regarding trustworthiness, safety and transparency in the financial
domain making way for projects that maximize effectiveness handled by various industries.

SECTION B: QUESTION 1

To assess the chances and profitability of each investment opportunity, there are several
financial metrics that should be used including Payback Period (PBP), Net Present Value
(NPV), Internal Rate Of Return(IRR). Thus, these measures facilitate the analysis of returns
on investment in terms of level as well as timeframe and risk. In this instance the Agricultural
Engineers Operated by R Noble Ltd are perusing three projects- A, B and C having a cost of
£70. There is available capital of £70, 00 when selecting the projects. It is time for us to
analyze the details of each project and suggest which one can be chosen.

Project A: Hydraulic Ramps

Project B: Workshop Modification to Metal Cutting Machine

Project C: Special Delivery Vehicle

The evaluation of the three investment projects A, B and C reveals that all choices are cost-
effective for R Noble Agricultural Engineers. The positive NPVs throughout the projects
indicate that each project is likely to earn returns above its cost of capital, thus making it an
economically viable venture. However, the decision-making procedure is a much more
complex process of analysis that rejects as merely profitability additional factors.

However, Project A with the subject of Hydraulic Ramp Installations has a unique profile
when compared to other projects. On this note, the project is a positive NPV despite
possessing longer payback period and lower IRR compared to other projects This
lengthened payback period suggests that the recovery of initial investment would be slower
and leave the company in a stage resembling loss-making, extending financial commitment
long hours coupled with high risk. Another aspect that is supported by the lower IRR is a
suboptimal use of capital, because returns might not be appropriate for each unit of risk
assumed with this project.

On the contrary, Project B – Workshop Modification to the Metal Cutting Machine appears as
a viable alternative. It is not only the fastest payback period in comparison to other three
projects mentioned ,but also with a highest IRR value. The short period of payback
symbolizes a quick return on investment, increasing liquidity and diminishing it to long-term
financial obligations. A higher IRR implies better performance in terms of utilization of capital
and thus the possibility that this project has a potential to generate optimal profits. This
involves quick returns coupled with high efficiency, making it an appealing decision to R
Noble because her goals included a speedy ROI and prudent application of the available
capital.

Project C, involving acquiring a Special Delivery Vehicle , is an offer making up on the

scales. It has a medium payback range and the IRR is between Projects A&B, as it
accommodates some mid ground balance of risk in return viability. Although it does not
demonstrate such fast returns as the Project B, this one is more balancedwhich makes it
appealing to stakeholders who are looking for a halfway house. Project C can be seen as a
safe option, offering predictable returns but without exposing the company's capital to the
long-term risk characteristic of Investment A or short term unpredictability encumbered by
investment B.

This decision arises from the fast payback period and high IRR that this project is capable of
offering in line with company philosophy to use capital efficiently for speedy returns.
Nevertheless, it is critical to highlight that this suggestion needs careful consideration in light
of the organisation’s strategic objectives and tolerance for risk. Finally, the conclusions
involving proof in a higher extent should not be based only on financial indicators but also
depend more thoroughly on business objectives, market conditions and ability of risk
management by company.

QUESTION 2

THE CASH OPERATING CYCLE FOR THE HARRINGTON CORPORATION

One of the most important indicators in assessing a company’s working capital management
efficiency is the cash operating cycle (Vukovic et al., 2023). It is depicts the elapsed time for a
business to recoup its inventory investment. This case of The Harrington Corporation, a
retailer that sells fences and prefabricated wood products is also available where the cash
operating cycle involves several processes. First, the organization invests in inventory by
purchasing products from forests of renewable woodlands in Finland and Sweden. But this
inventory also includes fencing and other wood products that meet the needs of farmers as
well as garden centers. Business activity has slowed down as a result of uncertainties that
are associated with Brexit, which cumulatively send the current cash flow problems.

The cycle starts with the sourcing of primary materials such as wood from renewable
sources in this case. Afterwards, production and assembly of the prefabs are carried out.
The finished items go into inventory for storage upon completion. Finally, selling phase
consists of these items being distributed to farmers and garden centers. The period required
to do the complete cycle of purchases, payments for raw materials as well as income
collection due to sales measures cash operating cycle.

Different aspects may determine the cash operating cycle’s length and these differences are
especially pronounced in terms of industries and sectors. For The Harrington Corporation,
the type of its operations where raw materials are procured from sustainable plantations and
varying customer demographics is served by use of technology as well indicates a relatively
complicated cycle. The freedom on international sources in case of the Finnish and Swedish
products is complicated by factors such as shipping time to it example when geopolitical
matters like Brexit come into place.

Longer production cycles or international supply chain-heavy industries may end up with
cash operating cycle periods. Whereas, cycles might be smaller for businesses oriented
toward services due to the fact they usually involve less stock and quicker realization of
return on investment. Secondly, the evolution of economic state, probable variations in
demand for market and external factors such as regulatory changes cause further down to
cash operating cycle.

The cash operating cycle is particularly important to grasping the nature of dealing with
working capital and generating useful insights when it comes to managing cash flows. This
cycle can be reviewed closely for The Harrington Corporation to help it identify weaknesses
in order to respond properly to the current challenge of cash flow. Approaches that involve
improving inventory levels, obtaining favorable payment terms from suppliers and valuable
distribution channels would all help the cash operating cycle become less cluttered in one
way or another to have an effect on better financial health of a company.

FOUR KEY RATIOS THAT CAN BE USED BY THE FINANCE MANAGER TO MONITOR

THE WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE BUSINESS

The Finance Manager of the Harrington Corporation, looking to address cash flow
constraints in light of uncertainties surrounding Brexit can strategically use important
financial ratios with regards working capital management. A vital of such ratios is the Current
Ratio—the current assets/current liabilities proportion. This ratio gives some idea about the
short-term debt paying ability of the company and to repay its imminent commitments.
Although a large current ratio can imply an effective position in terms of liquidity, it might as
well be signifying idle resources that could be more aggressively utilized elsewhere. On the
contrary, a poor current ratio would signal problems with liquidity; however in this case, it
could also be attributed to efficient working capital management by firstly managing its cash
conversion cycle.

The Quick Ratio, or Acid-Test ratio improves analysis by excluding inventory from current
assets and allows one to know the measure of liquidity is more conservative (Shad, 2023). It
has relevance, especially for The Harrington Corporation that sells the prefabricated wooden
products. Whereas a higher quick ratio is interpreted as better short-term solvency, it may
mean at the same time an underinvestment in stocks that can result into lost sales.
However, a lower current quick ratio may suggest higher inventory but it could also show
better sales prospects and market receptiveness.

Another essential metric of The Harrington Corporation is Inventory Turnover, as it measures

how well the company manages its inventory. The ratio is determined by the cost of goods
sales divided to average inventory (Leonard and Main, 2023). The inventory turnover ratio is
high which means that there are timely sales, but this may also be an indication of
aggressive selling strategies inconsistent with profitability. On the other hand, a lower ratio
could signal an inventory moving at less than average pace but also may mean that high-
quality products of long life are being maintained. For The Harrington Corporation, finding
the very balance between sales and profitability is critical to achieve both highs with
sustainability.

Finally, the Receivables Turnover Ratio measures how fast a company’s inventory is sold. It
is determined as the ratio of average accounts receivable divided by total credit sales. This
can mean when the figure is high it will demonstrate that there was good credit
management, though a lower could denote strict terms of credits which might affect sales.
On the contrary, a lower ratio might be sign of unsuccessful efforts in recovering receivables
nevertheless it could also derive from lenience on credit terms thus gaining trust and support
by customers hence more revenues overtime.

In conclusion, although such financial ratios provide useful insights concerning the practices
of working capital management at Nike Inc., they are accompanied by some trade-offs. The
Finance Manager from the Harrington Corporation, then needs to consider these ratios for
careful balancing with consideration of peculiarities in his business competitive environment
and strategic goals. The Finance Manager would through the adoption of a detailed ratio
analysis come up with solutions that ensure effective management of working capital,
address issues related to cash flow and positioning the company for sustenance financially
arising from uncertainties during brexit.

QUESTION 3

The rise of Big Data is certainly seen as a disruptive phenomenon in many new industries
including the one we are talking about, namely accounting and finance. It can be expected
that use of Big Data in the Accounting firms will bring substantial benefits, as it brings
knowledge quantity and quality which provide clear understanding about strategic decisions,
services improvement and long-term stability. In this extensive analysis we cover the
strengths and weaknesses of incorporating big data information in financial entities, with
emphasis on accounting and finance professionals that are responsible for checking
company progress.

Positive Aspects

Informed Decision-Making:

Making informed decisions is one of the key advantages of employing Big Data in
accounting and finance. Professionals are able to draw crucial information from large
datasets that regard financial behaviors, industry trends and market dynamics. This
knowledge forms the basis for predicting changes, adjustments to strategies as well as
proactivity in dealing with problems. With informed decision-making, a firm can use it as its
foundation to develop the necessary competitive advantage and sustainability.

Weaknesses, risks and inefficiencies are easily identified from Big Data analysis. With the
help of these data- driven realizations, experts can adopt standardized processes; this will
improve operational efficiency and reduce error chances. This forward-looking approach also
helps in the smooth running of operations while at the same improving on risk mitigation
enjoyed by an organization therefore creating a robust monetary system.

The Big Data realization in the accounting and finance domain improves accuracy reporting,
ensuring consistency of firm’s data. This is essential in enabling clients to have useful
understandings of their financial positions, letting them know that all is transparency and
trust. Secondly, in regard to tax filings Big Data contributes to regulation of the following
issues: compliance with tax codes; accuracy checks and inhibition of fraud. This leads to
boosting efficiency in budgets and accountancy analysis, thus saving time that could
otherwise be exhausted by the process.

Audit Efficiency:

Sampling, which means limiting accuracy and efficiency, lies to the core of traditional audit
processes. This landscape is changed with the arrival of Big Data by permitting
professionals to perform detailed analysis on entire datasets over whole. This evolution
improves the effectiveness of audit analyses in a way that gives additional detailed
examination with respect to financial data. It, therefore, makes compliance and due diligence
more reliable for the interests of stakeholders and regulatory bodies.
Negative Aspects:

Cost Considerations:

Although the advantages of Big Data analysis are tremendous, rising costs are an enormous
obstacle for accounting firms especially small size companies with limited budgets. Getting
started with Big Data entails spending on equipment, facilities, and preparation. The amount
of financial investment needed may be a barrier to others, thereby possibly limiting their
accessibility to the transformative potentials which emanates from Big Data.

Working with large quantities of data – client and business information that is highly
personalized should, indeed, prompt concern over issues relating to the safety and
confidentiality of records. Cyber security must therefore be one of the key focus points for
individuals in accounting and finance profession to avoid hacking breaches or unauthorized
accesses. Failure to protect the integrity and confidentiality of data can lead significant
losses for a company’s reputation as well d their clients.

Ethical Considerations:

As Big data becomes an intrinsic part of the decision-making process, ethical questions have
found a place as well. Regardless of where an accountant or a financial professional stands
with respect to the broader use of data and its responsible application, it is essential that
anything derived on whose insists must be in compliance with acceptable ethical standards
as well as legal rights. There are, however, ethical dilemmas arising from the risk of misuse
or biased analysis that may produce undesired effects like a bad reputation and loss of
confidence in clients.

Conclusion:

Adopting Big Data analysis is critical to the success of financial institutions, especially
prioritizing accounting and finance. Among the benefits include better decision-making,
increased operational efficiency that can either establish or destroy firms’ success and
growth. Still, accountants and finance professionals should take into consideration the
downsides of centralized identity management such as cost issues or data protection
concerns or ethical implications. To find a middle ground between exploiting the good of Big
Data and having to face these challenges, one needs not only an accurate but also wise
solution. Basically, Big Data integration into accounting practices can be a real breakthrough
if practitioners follow the best practice guidelines in order to benefit from potential
opportunities while reducing associated threats.

REFERENCES

Abdennadher, S., Grassa, R., Abdulla, H. and Alfalasi, A. (2021). The effects of blockchain
technology on the accounting and assurance profession in the UAE: an exploratory
study. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-05-2020-0151.

Canina, L. and Carvell, S. (2008). Journal of Hospitality Financial Management Journal of

Hospitality Financial Management The Professional Refereed Journal of the International
Association of Hospitality Financial The Professional Refereed Journal of the International
Association of Hospitality Financial Management Educators Management Educators Volume
16 Issue 1 Article 12 2008 Restaurant Operators and Restaurant Franchisors. Journal of
Hospitality Financial Management, [online] 16. Available at:
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=jhfm [Accessed
15 Jan. 2024].

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R.P., Suman, R. and Khan, S. (2022). A review of Blockchain
Technology applications for financial services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks,
Standards and Evaluations, [online] 2(3), p.100073.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073.

Leonard, K. and Main, K. (2023). How To Calculate Inventory Turnover – Forbes Advisor.
[online] www.forbes.com. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/how-
calculate-inventory-turnover/.

Misamore, B. (2017). How to Value a Company [Process and Examples] | HBS Online.
[online] Business Insights - Blog. Available at: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/how-to-value-
a-company.

Shad, A.A. (2023). Revenue Growth Rate: Definition, Formula & How to Improve it. [online]
Thoughts about Product Adoption, User Onboarding and Good UX | Userpilot Blog.
Available at: https://userpilot.com/blog/revenue-growth-rate/ [Accessed 19 Dec. 2023].
Stobierski, T. (2020). How to Determine the Financial Health of Your Company | HBS
Online. [online] Harvard Business School. Available at:
https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/how-to-determine-the-financial-health-of-a-company.

Vukovic, D.B., L.Yu. Spitsyna, Vladislav Spitsin and Ekaterina Gribanova (2023). The joint
impact of working capital and platform-economy on firm profitability: The case of e-business
model in transition country. urnal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,
9(2), pp.100060–100060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100060.