Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management System
a. project title
Keanu Leo N. Nedruda Aikon Delos Reyes John Christian Valdez Dylan Lacson
Conflict Encounters
Conflicts Encounter Scenario:
Setting: A team meeting during the development phase of the "Student Record-Keeping Management System.“
Characters:
1.Keanu Leo N. Nedruda (Developer): Leads the software development team.
2.Aikon Delos Reyes (Database Specialist): Manages database-related tasks.
3.John Christian Valdez (Project Manager): Oversees the project and ensures alignment with goals.
4.Dylan Lacson (Marketing Lead): Responsible for promoting the system.
Conflict: The team is facing a conflict regarding the prioritization of features in the upcoming release. Keanu, the lead developer, is pushing for the inclusion of advanced
data analytics features, emphasizing their potential to provide valuable insights. Aikon, the database specialist, is concerned about the additional workload and complexity
this may introduce, suggesting a phased implementation approach. John, the project manager, is focused on meeting the project timeline and is worried about potential
delays. Dylan, the marketing lead, is eager to start promoting the system and is concerned that delays might impact the marketing strategy.
Tensions:
•Technical vs. Timeline Concerns: Keanu and Aikon are at odds regarding the technical feasibility and potential delays associated with implementing advanced analytics.
•Project Goals vs. Marketing Strategy: John and Dylan have differing perspectives on whether prioritizing advanced features aligns with the project's overall goals or
impacts the marketing strategy.
Resolution Steps:
1.Clarify Goals: John facilitates a discussion to ensure everyone is aligned with the project's overarching goals. This helps in understanding whether advanced analytics
aligns with the project's primary objectives.
2.Technical Feasibility Discussion: Keanu and Aikon discuss the technical feasibility of the proposed features, exploring options for phased implementation to manage
workload concerns.
3.Timeline Assessment: John works with the team to reassess the project timeline, considering both technical complexities and marketing strategies.
4.Prioritization Exercise: The team collectively prioritizes features based on their impact on project goals and marketing objectives.
5.Compromise: The team reaches a compromise by agreeing to include a scaled-down version of the advanced analytics features in the upcoming release, with a
commitment to revisit and expand on them in future updates.
Outcome: The conflict resolution process results in a balanced approach that aligns with both technical considerations and project timelines. The compromise satisfies the
team's varying concerns and ensures the development and promotion of the "Student Record-Keeping Management System" stay on track.