Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David Dowling
Roger Hadgraft
Anna Carew
Tim McCarthy
Doug Hargreaves
Caroline Baillie
Sally Male
Fourth edition published 2020 by
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
42 McDougall Street, Milton Qld 4064
© John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2010, 2013, 2016, 2020
A catalogue record for this book is available from the National Library of Australia.
The authors and publisher would like to thank the copyright holders, organisations and
individuals for the permission to reproduce copyright material in this book.
Every effort has been made to trace the ownership of copyright material. Information that will
enable the publisher to rectify any error or omission in subsequent editions will be welcome. In
such cases, please contact the Permissions Section of John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Wiley
Terry Burkitt (Director, Publishing and Course Development), Lori Dyer (Senior Publisher),
Kylie Challenor (Senior Manager, Knowledge & Learning Content Management), Rebecca
Campbell (Production Editor), Tara Seeto (Publishing Coordinator), Emily Brain (Production
Assistant), Renee Bryon (Copyright & Image Research), Delia Sala (Cover Design)
Printed in Singapore by
Markono Print Media Pte Ltd
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1%%%%%
BRIEF CONTENTS
About the authors ix
Preface xii
1. What is engineering? 2
2. The engineering method 43
3. Sustainable engineering 85
4. Professional responsibility and ethics 128
5. Self-management 165
6. Working with people 206
Index 600
CONTENTS
About the authors ix The scientific method 55
Preface xii 2.2 Systems thinking 56
The system boundary 56
PART 1 2.3 Project management 59
Defining the scope 59
Introduction to engineering 1 Scheduling 60
Resources 61
CHAPTER 1
Documentation — the design file 61
What is engineering? 2 Time–accuracy trade-off 62
Introduction 3 Agile project management 63
1.1 What is the role of an engineer? 4 Risk management 63
A historical perspective 4 Reporting and documentation 65
A contemporary perspective 6 Improving practice 66
1.2 Engineering disciplines 7 Life-long learning 67
Electrical, electronics and The engineering method and project
telecommunications engineering 9 management 68
Mechanical engineering 10 2.4 The life cycle of an engineering
Aerospace and aviation engineering 11 asset 68
Chemical engineering 12 Design 70
Civil engineering 12 2.5 Critical thinking 73
Environmental engineering 14 Critical thinking in an engineering
Materials engineering 15 context 74
Mining engineering 16 Moving from having an opinion to taking
Other engineering disciplines 16 a position 79
Summary 80
1.3 The core skills and attributes of an
Key terms 81
engineer 17
Exercises 81
The Engineers Australia competency Project activity 82
framework 18 References 82
The Engineering New Zealand Acknowledgements 83
framework 20
1.4 Engineering science 23 PART 2
1.5 The impact of engineering on society
and national identity 24
Engineering in society 84
A historical perspective 25
CHAPTER 3
A contemporary perspective 32
Engineering innovations 34 Sustainable engineering 85
Limitations of engineering 34 Introduction 86
1.6 Professionalism, certification and 3.1 What is ecologically sustainable
ethical practice in engineering 36 development (ESD)? 88
Summary 38 Definitions of ESD 89
Key terms 38
What is sustainable engineering? 92
Exercises 39
Why sustainable engineering? 93
Project activity 40
3.2 Strategies for practising sustainable
References 40
Acknowledgements 42 engineering 95
Constraints of sustainable engineering
CHAPTER 2 practice 98
Triple bottom line analysis (TBLA) 100
The engineering method 43 3.3 Environmentally sustainable
Introduction 44 engineering 100
2.1 The engineering method 45 A global perspective 101
Step 1. Exploring the problem 46 Measuring environmental impacts 103
Step 2. Exploring alternative solutions 51 Life cycle assessment (LCA) 106
Step 3. Evaluating alternative solutions 53 3.4 Socially sustainable engineering 110
Step 4. Engineering decision making 54 Promoting intergenerational and
Step 5. Communicating your recommendation 55 intragenerational equity 110
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs 112
Community communication and 5.2 What motivates you? 172
consultation 113 Sources of inspiration 176
Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) 5.3 Developing your skills 178
114 Developing an inquiring mind 178
Engagement techniques 116 5.4 Self-management skills 181
3.5 Economically sustainable Developing goals and strategies 181
engineering 117 Being responsible 181
Costing 117 Being professional 181
Economic theories 118 Managing your time effectively 182
Least cost planning (LCP) 118 5.5 Life-long learning 183
Summary 121 Knowledge frameworks 186
Key terms 122 The program framework 187
Exercises 123
Managing your learning 189
Project activity 124
5.6 Reviewing your performance 196
References 124
Acknowledgements 126 Levels of reflection 199
Kolb’s Learning Cycle 199
CHAPTER 4 Summary 201
Key terms 202
Professional responsibility Exercises 202
and ethics 128 Project activity 203
Introduction 129 References 203
Acknowledgements 205
4.1 Professional responsibility: standards
and professional liability 130
4.2 Work health and safety (WHS) and CHAPTER 6
personal liability 133
Product recall 137
Working with people 206
4.3 Engineering ethics 138 Introduction 207
The Engineering New Zealand Code of 6.1 Collaborating with others 208
Ethical Conduct 140 6.2 Working in groups 214
The IEEE Code of Ethics 141 Establishing a group or team 215
Interpreting and applying codes of The fundamentals of an effective
ethics 142 group 217
4.4 Ethical theories 143 The life cycle of a team 220
Morals and ethics 143 Improving performance 221
4.5 Common ethical dilemmas in Leadership 223
engineering 147 The benefits of working with others 224
Micro ethics 148 6.3 Meetings 225
Balancing conflicting interests 151 The purpose 225
4.6 Macro ethics 154 The style 228
4.7 Culture and corruption 155 The timing 228
International business etiquette 156 The length of the meeting 228
Corruption and bribery 156 The participants 228
Summary 159 The procedures 228
Key terms 160 Your contribution 229
Exercises 161 Organising a meeting 229
Project activity 162 The role of technology in meetings 232
References 162 The downside of working with
Acknowledgements 163 others 232
PART 3
6.4 Negotiation 235
The preparation process 235
Professional skills 164 Approaches to negotiation 236
Outcomes of the negotiation
CHAPTER 5 process 238
Self-management 165 6.5 Dispute resolution 239
Conflict resolution 240
Introduction 166
Summary 241
5.1 Understanding self 168
Key terms 242
Your personality and attitudes 168 Exercises 242
Spatial ability 171
CONTENTS v
Project activity 243 Presenting through words and action 303
References 243 Answering questions 304
Acknowledgements 244 8.3 Written communication skills 304
Reading 304
PART 4
Writing 305
Communication 246 Wikis 311
Web pages 311
CHAPTER 7 8.4 Visual communication 312
Data 312
Understanding Summary 327
communication 247 Key terms 327
Introduction 248 Exercises 328
7.1 What is communication? 249 References 328
Key communication skills for engineers 251 Acknowledgements 329
7.2 Communication theories and models 252 PART 5
The communication process 253
A contemporary model 254 Applying the engineering
Developing a communication model for method 330
engineers 255
7.3 Communication contexts 259 CHAPTER 9
Characteristics of communicators 260
Environments 264 Understanding the
Digital communication 266 problem 331
7.4 Communication methods 270 Introduction 332
Channels 270 9.1 Data, information and knowledge 334
Communication languages 270 Data 334
Noise 272 Information 340
7.5 Communication roles 275 Knowledge 340
The creator 275 Differentiating between data, information and
The gatekeeper 278 knowledge 341
The consumer 279 9.2 Identifying information needs 343
Summary 281 Investigative questioning 343
Key terms 282 Categories of information 345
Exercises 282 Organising information needs 345
Project activity 282
9.3 Locating and retrieving information 348
References 283
Typical sources of engineering
Acknowledgements 284
information 348
CHAPTER 8 Documents 349
Colleagues 351
Communication skills 285 Stakeholders 353
Introduction 286 Geographic information systems 357
8.1 Verbal communication skills 291 Library search tools 359
Listening 292 Internet search tools 360
Telling 293 Developing a search strategy 360
Discussing 293 Recording data about information
Informal verbal communication 294 sources 364
8.2 Formal verbal communication 296 9.4 Evaluating information and information
Media releases, interviews and sources 364
publicity 296 Evaluating information sources 364
Presentations 297 Evaluating information 365
Working to presentation time limits 298 Refining information needs 366
The presentation contexts 299 9.5 Managing and using information 366
Content and structure 300 Integrating information 367
Selecting and preparing media 301 Publishing information 368
Assembling and rehearsing the A literature review 368
presentation 302 An information management system 368
Is approval required? 303 Controlling access to your information 371
vi CONTENTS
9.6 Citing and referencing 373 Key terms 445
Listing and citing print references 373 Exercises 445
Listing and citing online references 375 Project activity 446
Further information about referencing References 446
styles 376 Acknowledgements 447
Summary 377
Key terms 378 CHAPTER 12
Exercises 378
Project activity 378
Engineering decision
References 380 making 448
Acknowledgements 381 Introduction 449
12.1 Engineering decision making 449
CHAPTER 10 Engineering decision support 450
Engineering design 382 12.2 Complexity 452
Static and dynamic problems 452
Introduction 383
12.3 Team-based decision making 453
10.1 Design = problem solving 384
Effective team environment 455
Key ideas in the design process 384
Dominance and power 455
10.2 Systems thinking 387
Diversity in teams 456
Stakeholders 389
Making better decision makers 457
Socio–ecological thinking 392
12.4 Reviewing key decision-making
Whole system design goals 393
criteria 460
Whole system design elements 396
Uncertainty 460
10.3 Generating alternative solutions 404
Environment 460
Five Ws and an H 404
Ethics 460
Research 405
Safety 461
Brainstorming 406
Review and improve — quality
Lateral thinking, parallel thinking and the six
assurance 461
thinking hats 407
12.5 Decision support systems, tools and
Synectics 410
techniques 463
TRIZ 412
‘Pen and paper’ decision support tools 463
Transforming design through biomimetic
thinking and design 414 Computer-based DSS 465
Summary 417 Networked DSS relying on communications
Key terms 417 technology 467
Exercises 418 Intelligent DSS (IDSS) 471
Project activity 418 GIS-based DSS 472
References 419 Summary 475
Acknowledgements 420 Key terms 475
Exercises 476
CHAPTER 11 Project activity 476
References 476
Evaluating options 422 Acknowledgements 477
Introduction 423
11.1 Evaluating solutions — economics 423 CHAPTER 13
Non-economic criteria 424
Managing engineering
Qualitative approaches to project
evaluation 424 projects 478
Economic feasibility 425 Introduction 479
Sensitivity analysis 431 13.1 Understanding project management 480
A more detailed economic model 432 Key factors in project management 481
11.2 Technical feasibility 436 The Project Management Body of Knowledge
11.3 Mathematical modelling in design 438 (PMBOK) and project management
Power output 439 standards 481
Maximising energy production 440 Project management tools 485
Safety 442 13.2 Planning the stages of an engineering
Checking 443 project 488
Hierarchy of models 443 Using a tool to plan the project stages 489
Summary 445
CONTENTS vii
Planning the stages of the green-star building Project initiation documents 541
project 492 Risk management documents 547
Human resources 500 14.4 Technical presentations 553
Financial resources 502 How can poor presentation be
13.3 Creating a risk-management plan 503 avoided? 553
Dependency risks 504 14.5 Visual communication 555
Design risks 505 Drawings, plans and sketches 556
Construction risks and safety 505 Photography 557
Internal project risks 507 Engineering models 557
Long-term risks for the green-star Summary 566
building 508 Key terms 567
13.4 Developing a knowledge management Exercises 567
plan 508 Project activity 567
Document storage, archiving and data References 567
mining 509 Acknowledgements 568
Sharing knowledge 509 PART 6
Communities of practice 510
Student knowledge management 511 Planning your career 569
13.5 Quality management and its relationship
CHAPTER 15
to project management 511
Key quality management principles 512 Your engineering future
Engineering quality management 513
Quality plans and engineering 514
570
Quality and the engineering student 515 Introduction 571
Quality and student team projects 516 15.1 Engineering to meet future global
Summary 517 challenges 572
Key terms 517 Antibiotic resistance 572
Exercises 518 Climate change adaptation 576
Project activity 519 15.2 Engineering and globalisation 581
References 519 Employment in Australia 581
Acknowledgements 520 Globalisation 582
Development and post development 583
CHAPTER 14
15.3 Futuristic engineering: emerging
Communicating information fields 584
Industrial biotechnology 585
521 Materials science 585
Introduction 522 Phytomining 586
14.1 Three communication contexts 523 Biomimicry 587
The business context 524 Animatronics 588
The discipline context 524 15.4 An engineering career 589
The public context 525 Work to rule — or be inspired to work
14.2 Planning a communication 527 towards a fulfilling career 590
Using the PCR model to create effective Management approaches 590
communication 527 Different types of engineering
Developing a communication plan for an organisations 591
engineering project 528 Efficiency and respect in the workplace 591
Using the model 529 Continuing professional development (CPD)
Approach 529 592
Communication methods, styles, formats Career planning 593
and media 531 Summary 595
14.3 Writing in the engineering Key terms 595
workplace 531 Exercises 596
Practice notes 533 Project activity 597
Business correspondence 534 References 597
Human resource documents 535 Acknowledgements 598
Financial documents 539
Index 600
viii CONTENTS
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
David Dowling
DipLSurv, ARMIT, BAppSci, MSurvMap, FIEAust
Honorary Professor of Engineering Education
Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland
David Dowling is passionate about facilitating student learning and helping engineering students to achieve
their career goals. Consequently, much of his work and research is focused on working with industry
representatives to develop practice-based curricula and to enhance teaching and learning environments.
Recently his focus has been on: facilitating student transition to university; identifying and addressing
factors that influence success at university; assessing workplace learning; working with practitioners
to define graduate attributes; embedding graduate attributes into program curricula; and engineering
technician education.
David worked as a surveyor for 12 years prior to accepting a lecturing position at the University of
Southern Queensland (USQ) in 1978. David was appointed Head of Surveying in 1989 and worked
intensively with industry organisations to design, develop and gain accreditation for three new distance
education programs in surveying and GIS — the first in Australia.
In 1995, he accepted the role of Associate Dean (Academic) in the Faculty of Engineering and
Surveying; a position he held until 2009. His major achievement in this role was the successful 2001
accreditation of the first Australian Bachelor of Engineering to be offered by distance education. In 2005,
David developed the content, structure and study materials for the innovative Master of Engineering
Practice program. This distance education program is accredited by Engineers Australia and enables
experienced Engineering Technologists to become Professional Engineers by using their workplace
learning to demonstrate their competence.
From 2009 to 2015, David led two major projects funded by the Office of Learning and Teaching and
was a member of the project team on three other projects. He has been a member of Engineers Australia’s
National Articulation Committee since 2006 and a member of the Australasian Association for Engineering
Education (AAEE) since 1998, serving as President during 2005 and 2006.
In 2006, David received the AAEE Excellence in Engineering Education Award for Inclusive Teaching,
and in 2008 he received an Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) Citation which read: For
sustained leadership in using graduate attributes to design and deliver programs, courses and resources
that enhance students’ learning and their achievement of career goals.
When David retired in 2015, he accepted an appointment as an Honorary Professor at the University of
Southern Queensland. This allows him to continue his research in engineering education topics that enable
students to achieve their career goals. He also consults with engineering organisations to help them define
and develop the personal and professional capabilities their employees need to have a successful career.
Roger Hadgraft
BE(Hons), MEngSc, DipCompSc, PhD
Professor and Director, Educational Innovation, University of Technology Sydney
Roger Hadgraft is a civil engineer with more than 25 years of involvement in improving engineering
education. He has published many papers on problem- and project-based learning (PBL), and the use of
student-centred learning to meet the needs of engineering employers. He was instrumental in introducing
a project-based curriculum in civil engineering at Monash University in 1998 and in civil, chemical and
environmental engineering at RMIT between 2003 and 2006. Roger has consulted on PBL to universities
both nationally and internationally and is currently leading change at University of Technology Sydney
(UTS), transforming the engineering curricula using studios to deliver innovative, design-able graduates.
Anna Carew
BSc(Hons), PhD
Course Coordinator, University College, University of Tasmania
In 1996, Anna Carew was a water microbiologist and began working with engineers to research novel
microbial indicators of water and wastewater quality. Having realised engineering was such a powerful and
Tim McCarthy
BE, MSc, PhD, MIEI
Professor of Structural Engineering, University of Wollongong
Professor Tim McCarthy joined the School of Civil Mining and Environmental Engineering in December
2004 after nearly 20 years as Lecturer and Senior Lecturer at the University of Manchester Institute
of Science and Technology. Tim’s specialisations include sustainable buildings, engineering education
research, integrated design systems and steel structure design, and he has supervised and co-supervised
62 PhDs, MPhil and MSc theses. In 2010, he received an Australian Learning and Teaching Citation for
Outstanding Contribution to Student Learning for leadership in curriculum and space design that fosters
collaborative learning. Tim is also the author of the best-selling textbook AutoCAD Express. He has taken
University of Wollongong (UOW) students to two Solar Decathlon world finals. In 2013, Team UOW won
the Solar Decathlon China while in 2018 they achieved the overall silver medal in the Middle East contest
in Dubai. Tim is currently Head of the School of Civil Mining and Environmental Engineering.
Doug Hargreaves
PhD, MSc, BEng, EngExec, Hon (IEAust)
Professor Doug Hargreaves is an Emeritus Professor in mechanical engineering at Queensland University
of Technology (QUT). He has spent his professional life in a mixture of academic and industry practice. He
was National President of the peak professional body for engineers, Engineers Australia, which had more
than 100 000 members in 2010. He was Head of School of Engineering Systems at QUT for seven years,
leading about 145 staff members. He returned to teaching over 1000 first-year engineering students a unit
called ‘Engineering and Sustainability’, which effectively taught what engineering graduates do in the real
world. He has published over 50 papers on the topic of engineering education and over 100 on his discipline
of tribology. He is co-author of a leadership book called Values-Driven Leadership. He was awarded a
member of the Order of Australia in the 2014 Queen’s Birthday Honours list for his significant contribution
to engineering education and to the community. He is the Executive Officer for the Australian Council
of Engineering Deans (ACED), Chair of the technical committee for the World Engineering Convention
to be held in Melbourne in November 2019, represents Engineers Australia (EA) on the Federation of
Engineering Institutions of Asia and the Pacific (FEIAP) and chairs EA’s International Advisory Panel.
Caroline Baillie
BSc(Hons), MHEduc, PhD
Professor of Praxis in Engineering and Social Justice, University of San Diego
Caroline Baillie is Professor of Praxis in Engineering and Social Justice at the University of San Diego.
She brings over 25 years of experience in teaching engineering across multiple engineering disciplines and
countries, research and development in engineering and education as well as community development and
social justice work. Previously she was Chair of Engineering Education for the Faculty of Engineering,
Computing and Mathematics at University of Western Australia, Chair of Engineering Education at
Queens University, Canada, educational developer and materials lecturer at Imperial College, UK and
the University of Sydney, as well as holding a three-year position founding and running the Materials
Engineering Subject Centre in the UK. Baillie’s research considers socio-technical processes and systems,
Sally A Male
Dr, BE, PhD
Chair in Engineering Education, The University of Western Australia
Sally A Male is a Fellow of Engineers Australia. She is an electrical engineer with a PhD on employability
in engineering. Sally is the Chair in Engineering Education at The University of Western Australia (UWA)
and is a Governance Board Member of the Engineering Institute of Technology. In her research, Sally leads
the UWA Engineering & Science Education, Society and Work Research Cluster and has led competitively
funded research projects in engineering education and higher education, focusing on curriculum develop-
ment, inclusion and work integrated learning (placement and non-placement, face-to-face and virtual).
Sally is Editor-in-Chief of the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education and an Associate Editor
of Journal of Engineering Education. In her teaching, Sally oversees the UWA Engineering Professional
Practicum, capstone electrical and electronic engineering design project units and the unit ‘Introduction
to Professional Engineering’. In 2017, Sally received the Engineers Australia Medal for contributions to
industry engagement in engineering education, and gender inclusion in engineering.
1 Institution of Engineers Australia 1996, Changing the culture: Engineering education into the future, IEAust, Canberra,
p. 4.
2 Australian Council of Engineering Deans 2008, Engineers for the future: Addressing the supply and quality of Australian
engineering graduates for the 21st century, ACED, p. 61. This project was funded by the Australian Learning and Teaching
Council.
xii PREFACE
The support for the first three editions of this text, as well as what it is achieving for undergraduate
engineering education in Australia and New Zealand, means a lot to us. In many ways, this text and
its accompanying extensive resource package should be seen as a resource generated for all engineering
schools in Australia and New Zealand. The authors would therefore welcome constructive feedback from
academic staff and students so that future editions continue to meet the needs of first-year engineering
students. This includes information about innovative engineering projects that may be suitable for inclusion
in future editions of the text.
Many people have contributed information that was incorporated directly into the body of the text,
or in one of the many practical engineering ‘spotlight’ features. The authors acknowledge the impor-
tant contribution of the following people to the development of this fourth edition: Armando Apan,
Madhu Bhaskaran, Gunilla Burrowes, Caroline But, Ian Cameron, Miles Cattach, Susan Conrad, Cheryl
Desha, Jason Eshraghian, Peter Fagan, Tim Gale, Peter Gibbings, Sue Murphy, Andrew Guzzomi,
Chris McAlister, Nicole Hahn, Charlie Hargroves, Prue Howard, Ali Kharrazi, Peter Knights, Ilsa
Kuiper, Nelson Lam, Julia Lamborn, Traci Nathans-Kelly, Christine Grohowski Nicometo, Katherine
Nguyen, Sharon Nightingale, Timothy Pfeiffer, Matthew Preston, Carl Reidsema, Philip Rubie, John
Russell, David Sampson, Warren Sharpe, Lori Sowa, Geoff Spinks, Clive Stack, Peter Stasinopoulos and
Andrew Schroder.
We would like to thank the team at Wiley for their assistance in the development of this text and its
associated resources.
We would also like to acknowledge the members of our families who have lived the highs and lows of
this project with us, some for the fourth time. We know the many sacrifices you made to help us meet the
tight deadlines that accompany a project of this nature.
David Dowling
Roger Hadgraft
Anna Carew
Tim McCarthy
Doug Hargreaves
Caroline Baillie
Sally Male
May 2019
PREFACE xiii
ENGINEERING
SPOTLIGHTS: AT A
GLANCE
Mechanical/ Electrical/
Chapter Spotlight Civil manufacturing electronics
Learning journeys X X X
2 Wind energy X X X
Water recycling X
Software
Aeronautical
Software
Biomedical; materials
Maritime
X Computer
X Aerospace/aviation
X X
Software; hardware
X Materials
X Materials
X X
X X
X X
Admitting failure X X X
Graduate perspectives X X
Hydrographic surveys X
A 3D printed car X X
X Geomatic
X X
X X
X X X Chemical; nuclear
X X X Agricultural
Geomatic
X X Geomatic
Swarm communication X X
3D buildings in a 3D world X
Software checking X X X
Geomatic; telecommunications
Geomatic; telecommunications
X Biomedical; materials
Biomedical
X X Geomatic
X Minerals/metallurgical
X X X Geomatic
X X X
X Geomatic
X Materials
X X Materials
Telecommunications; software
X Structural
X X X Software
Planning a proposal X X X
Slide rules X X X
+
Using 3D models to communicate design and X X
operational information
Microscope in a needle X X
X X X
X Geomatic; software
X Aeronautical
Aerospace
Software
Structural
X Coastal/ocean/marine
Mechatronic; software
INTRODUCTION TO
ENGINEERING
1 What is engineering? 2
2 The engineering method 43
CHAPTER 1
What is engineering?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Pdf_Folio:2
Introduction
In this chapter you will explore what engineers know, think and do in practising engineering. Perhaps you
have chosen to study engineering with clear ideas about engineers being people who design technological
solutions to problems. You may be motivated by job security and a good salary. You might want to make
a difference in the world.
You will learn about the many dimensions of engineering work. The emergence of the main engineering
disciplines will be explained. You will learn how engineering innovation has coloured people’s lives
throughout history, and how the fundamental concepts of engineering science underpin engineering. You
will also discover some of the core skills of an engineer (many of which are explored in depth in the coming
chapters). But first, what is engineering?
In his article ‘Engineering a future’, published in the New Zealand Education Review (2007), journalist
John Gerritsen asked leading professionals and academics for their take on ‘what engineering is’. The
article won Gerritsen a New Zealand Engineering Excellence Award in Engineering Journalism. Consider
the following extract from this article (p. 8):
‘The difference between engineering and science’, says the chair of the Council of Engineering Deans, Bob
Hodgson, ‘is that engineering has to work’. After all, there’s not a lot of use for bridges that test interesting
principles but can’t be driven on, or electricity grids that black out.
The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand [now Engineering New Zealand] executive
director Andrew Cleland agrees. Overseas experience indicates businesses are stronger if engineers are
involved in their management and governance. Andrew suggested engineering is divided into two broad
types — infrastructural or ‘civil’ engineering, and wealth creation. The former is concerned with the
systems on which modern society depends, such as roads, and the latter with new products or systems,
such as those developed in the field of information technology.
Natasha McCarthy, policy advisor to the Royal Academy of Engineering in the United Kingdom, states
in her book (2012, p. 15):
Engineering is inherently creative — it takes what nature provides in order to make something new, or
to make things behave in novel ways. Engineers should never be satisfied with the way things are; the
successful engineer will always want to intervene, to change things so that they work better.
In Australia and New Zealand, professional bodies accredit engineering courses and register engineers
to practice. These bodies are Engineers Australia and Engineering New Zealand. There are nine general
areas of practice recognised by Engineers Australia: aerospace, biomedical, chemical, civil, electrical,
environmental, ITEE (information, telecommunications and electronics engineering), mechanical and
structural (Engineers Australia 2018a). Many fields of engineering sit within the nine general areas of
practice. For example, mining engineering, mechatronic engineering and medical engineering are named
engineering courses at Australian and New Zealand universities. Graduates from those courses would
register under the most closely related general area of practice.
In addition to general areas of practice, it is possible for practicing engineers to register their
expertise and competence to undertake specialist engineering work under a ‘special area of practice’.
In Australia, there are 13 recognised special areas of practice including amusement ride inspection, fire
safety, heritage and conservation management, leadership and management, petroleum engineering and
subdivisional geotechnics.
These areas of practice and specialisation change over the years in response to industry and societal
demand. Engineering is about innovation and there are a range of views on what the future holds for
engineers and engineering specialisations. We will examine these in more detail as this chapter progresses
and in subsequent chapters of this text.
Engineers Australia offers a fairly clear description of what engineering is from an Australian perspec-
tive. For the sake of brevity, the following summarises the key aspects of Engineers Australia’s description
of engineering from their Stage 1 Competency Standards (Engineers Australia 2017a).
Engineers take responsibility for engineering projects and programs in the most far-reaching sense.
This includes:
• reliable functioning of all materials and technologies used and the systems created
• interactions between the technical system and the social and physical environment where it functions
• understanding the requirements of clients and of society as a whole
• working to optimise social, environmental and economic outcomes over the lifetime of the product
or program
Pdf_Folio:3
KEY POINT
All engineers should be technically competent; beyond that there are vast arrays of ways to be, and
practise as, an engineer.
A historical perspective
The engineer, as we understand the role, began to emerge during the Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries in the United Kingdom and Europe. These engineers relied heavily on precedent,
rules of thumb and experimentation to execute technical projects. The engineer was considered as much
an artisan or master craftsperson as they were a scientist. During the 1900s, significant discoveries in
mathematics and physics and the advent of computing paved the way for engineering approaches based on
mathematical modelling and the application of fundamental principles known as engineering science. (An
overview of engineering science is given later in the chapter.) This science-based approach to engineering
enabled many of the technological breakthroughs of the twentieth century. Two examples of technological
Pdf_Folio:4
As a result of the advances in glass purity and lasers, engineers (and most of the rest of society)
have come to rely heavily on dependable, high-speed, high-fidelity telecommunications based on fibre
optics. Fibre optics allow engineers to, for example, communicate in real-time when working in global
design teams, track and digitise human movement to develop high-end movie graphics, provide medical
aid in rehabilitation medicine and develop distributed control systems by combining fibre optics, infra-
red detectors and signal-processing electronics to safely and remotely monitor and control systems in
chemical engineering and manufacturing. Optical fibres came about as result of the confluence of two
technological and scientific breakthroughs. The first was a breakthrough in physics by Charles Townes
and his colleagues at Columbia University in New York and was based on Einstein’s earlier discoveries
about stimulated emission (the capacity of electrons to absorb and emit photons). The Columbia team
led by Townes developed microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation or ‘maser’. The
maser was an immediate precursor to light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, which is now
known as ‘laser’.
The second breakthrough paving the way for society’s current ubiquitous reliance on optic fibre was the
development in the 1970s of high-purity glass fibres. To make optical fibre communications viable, these
Pdf_Folio:5
A contemporary perspective
The skills, knowledge and attitudes employers and society expect of engineers have changed over time.
Literacy in maths, physics and computer modelling have long been considered fundamental to the work
of professional engineers (Stephan 2001), but engineers are expected to know and do more than that.
Mitchell, Carew and Clift (2004) suggested the main role of engineers is to apply technical competence
as a means of transforming ‘natural capital’, such as water, solar energy or mineral deposits, into ‘human
and built capital’, such as energy or metal goods. Strong technical competence is the requisite basis for
designing this transformation; however, as many engineering practitioners are now discovering, technical
competence is not the only requisite skill for professional practice.
According to prominent UK engineer Roland Clift, an engineer must be not only technically competent,
but must understand that technology often has diverse consequences. The job of engineers is to seek an
understanding of, and take responsibility for, the broader social, environmental and economic impacts
of the work they do. They need to consider the impact of their work through the whole life cycle of
an engineering product or process — from cradle (extraction or acquisition of raw materials) through to
production and use and then to grave (decommissioning and disposal or recycling) — in terms of possible
impacts on future generations (Clift 1998).
In a survey involving 300 Australian engineers, participants were asked to identify which skill, attribute
or area of knowledge was most lacking in recent engineering graduates (Male, Chapman & Bush 2010).
The survey participants rated the following competencies as the most lacking: communication skills, self-
management, attitude, problem solving and teamwork. In line with these findings, the UK Henley Report
(Henley Management College 2006) and the Australian King Report (2008) suggested that engineers
needed the skills to fit into one of five broad categories. These are outlined in figure 1.1.
• Technical specialists. Engineers at the leading edge of their discipline, who work with those in other
disciplines to conceive, create and implement highly innovative engineered systems.
• Integrators. Engineers skilled at working across technical, disciplinary and organisational boundaries
in complex business, social and political environments.
• Change agents. Engineers who apply creativity, innovation and leadership developed through
engineering studies and practice to solve high-profile issues, such as ecological sustainability and
climate change.
• Project managers. Engineers who deploy highly developed interpersonal, organisational and financial
management skills to execute engineering projects.
• Asset maintainers. Engineers who are responsible for understanding, maintaining, adapting and
upgrading existing major engineering infrastructure, equipment and systems.
Source: Adapted from the UK Henley Report (2006) and the Australian King Report (2008).
Augustine (1994, p. 3) observed that, ‘Engineers must become as adept in dealing with societal and
political forces as they are with gravitational and electromagnetic forces’. A contemporary perspective on
Pdf_Folio:6
SPOTLIGHT
All you have to do is hold your phone, pass it over the various objects, and in real time it recognises
chairs, the floor, tables, different colours . . . A blind person would be able to have a much richer
experience of the world through this kind of technology (Engineers Australia 2016).
The pathway to working as an AI, robotics and technology entrepreneur has been interesting and
satisfying for Ms Cheng. She grew up in a Queensland housing commission suburb in a single-parent
family. After graduating from high school in 2006, Ms Cheng studied for a Bachelor of Engineering
(Mechatronics) and Bachelor of Computer Science at the University of Melbourne. Marita became aware
that there were very few female students in her engineering classes so she and her fellow engineering
students went to schools to teach girls robotics. While on academic exchange at Imperial College London,
Ms Cheng expanded Robogals to London and then throughout Australia, the UK, the US and Japan. Today
Robogals continues, running robotics workshops, career talks and community activities to introduce
young women to engineering (Cheng n.d.).
............................................................................................................................................................................
CRITICAL THINKING
It is clear that Ms Cheng is strongly motivated to develop innovations and take action that enable people
who are challenged by vision impairment or gender stereotypes. In your future work as an engineer, what
might motivate you and shape your direction as a professional? It could be that you want status and
financial security, or you may be driven to protect the environment, support social justice or develop
radical new ways to do everyday things. Take the time to draft a clear statement of the personal mission
guiding your career direction.
KEY POINT
Having a clear idea about what each of the engineering disciplines does will help you settle on the right
specialisation for you.
Pdf_Folio:8
Toothpaste (chemical,
mechanical, mechatronic)
Mechanical engineering
Engineers who work in mechanical engineering mostly specialise in the design, optimisation, trial,
creation and maintenance of mechanical systems and processes, and systems and processes that deal with
heat. A mechanical system is one with moving parts or ‘mechanisms’ and much of the work mechanical
engineers do with heat involves the generation and use of various forms of energy to power mechanisms
(e.g. combustion of fuels, capture of wind or wave energy). These mechanical, energy-using systems
pervade our everyday existence, from aircraft, car and ship engines, to the mechanical devices used for
the mass manufacture of industrial and consumer goods, such as extruded metal pipes, toothpaste (via
automated toothpaste tube filling machines) and bottled beverage assembly lines. Next time you enter a
cool room on a summer’s day, or choose to take the lift, consider the mechanical engineer who designed
the air-conditioning system or the elevator that has helped to spare you from perspiring.
Mechanical engineering assists the mass manufacture of consumer goods, such as the assembly line production of
bottled beverages.
A lot of the work of mechanical engineers relies on the concepts that fall under the headings of
‘dynamics’, ‘thermodynamics’ and ‘fluid dynamics’. All these concepts are about how force, energy and
motion apply in different settings. Dynamics is broadly the study of the force and energy required to set
solid members in motion, to stop them or to change their trajectory. Take a look at the pedal and braking
system of a child’s bike for a simple version of the application of dynamics in mechanical engineering.
Thermodynamics allows mechanical engineers to understand and control how heat moves within materials
and the conversion of heat from one energy form to another (e.g. from potential energy to momentum).
Mechanical engineers can, for example, use the principles of thermodynamics to design and size car engine
Pdf_Folio:10
SPOTLIGHT
Chemical engineering
Engineers who work in chemical engineering design and manage technology and processes for the large-
scale conversion of raw materials into useful and commercial products. This is chemistry on a grand
scale. These engineers might choose to spend their professional lives researching raw materials and their
properties. They might work in design and develop equipment and operating processes to extract and refine
raw materials, or in manufacturing to produce food, petrol, plastics, paints, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals,
paper, ceramics, minerals and more. Extracting and processing raw materials safely and without harming
the environment is a major specialisation of chemical engineers. This means that clean production, hazard
analysis, work health and safety, industrial ecology, environmental protection and the reclamation or clean-
up of contaminated sites account for a substantial part of the employment market for chemical engineers.
Engineering fields that are closely related to chemical engineering include: combustion and petroleum
engineering (design and operation of large-scale combustion chemistry for fuel refining and energy
generation), smelting engineering (heat extraction of metals from bulk metal-rich ores), and water and
wastewater treatment engineering (physical, chemical and biological treatment of water, wastewater and
sewage sludge) (Engineers Australia 2014).
Civil engineering
Engineers working in the field of civil engineering undertake civil works that contribute to how people
live their everyday lives. Their work focuses on the physical infrastructure of both urban and rural
environments. In other words, when you walk around outside you will see civil engineering everywhere:
buildings, roads and traffic control systems, water supply, stormwater and wastewater treatment, bridges,
ports, dams and so on.
Much of the work of civil engineers relies on the concepts that fall under the headings of ‘structural
mechanics’, ‘fluid mechanics’ and ‘geomechanics’. Structural mechanics is the study of the behaviour and
distortion of solid elements placed under various forms of load; for example, a fully laden Mack truck
parked on a wooden bridge. Many civil engineering graduates work as structural engineers, designing
the frameworks to support buildings and bridges. Fluid mechanics allows civil engineers to understand
the forces that operate within, and are caused by, the movement of water and wind; for example, in the
design of a wastewater treatment plant or in a desalination plant or a bridge pier in a fast-flowing river.
Geomechanics is a specialised application of structural and fluid mechanics. It explains how soil and rock
behave under pressure and in relation to water; for example, in the design of a retaining wall and drainage
system to prevent land slip under conditions of extreme rainfall or saturation.
Pdf_Folio:12
Pdf_Folio:13
Environmental engineering
Engineers who work in environmental engineering are responsible for protecting the environment by
assessing the impact a technology, project or process will have on ecosystems, the air, water, soil and
noise levels in its vicinity. This is done by investigating and analysing engineering works and designing
operating procedures and processes to minimise adverse effects on the environment.
Environmental engineers predict what problems may be caused by accidents, such as oil or chemical
spills, and work to assess likely long-term environmental effects. Environmental engineers are also
involved in removing or remediating problems caused by past human and industrial activity. This might
include deciding how to clean up contaminated industrial land so it can be used for housing, deciding on
a plan to manage heavy metal contamination of sediments in harbours and fishing ports, or working out
whether an old landfill site is safe to be used as a sporting field. They also plan and design equipment and
processes for the treatment and safe disposal of waste material from municipalities (e.g. domestic solid
waste and sewage sludge) and industry (e.g. biological hazards, construction and demolition waste), and
they direct the conservation and wise use of natural resources. Some environmental engineers are involved
in research and development of alternative energy sources, processes and procedures for water reclamation,
and development of innovative waste treatment and recycling technologies and procedures.
Environmental engineers need to maintain their knowledge of the legislative and regulatory frameworks
that govern the environmental performance of engineering work. They also keep up-to-date with environ-
mental standards such as those governing emissions of gaseous and liquid-borne wastes to the atmosphere
or waterways (Engineers Australia 2014).
Pdf_Folio:14
‘Approach and outcomes: The hydraulic modelling of the Upper Condamine River catchment was undertaken
using a coupled 1D/2D MIKE FLOOD Flexible Mesh model. The model covered an area of approximately
2230 km2 with mesh elements ranging from 3 m2 to 3600 m2 in area. Over 30 bridges and culverts were
represented in a 1D MIKE 11 model and coupled to the mesh topography. The model was validated to the
December 2010 flood event. Comprehensive mapping showing modelled surface elevations, velocities,
depths, flood hazard and hydraulic categories for the full set of modelled events was also produced to inform
future Planning Scheme amendments’ (Water Modelling Solutions 2017).
............................................................................................................................................................................
CRITICAL THINKING
Consider how the model and the associated information systems may be used by state government
agencies and local government bodies to prepare for future flood events.
Materials engineering
Engineers who work in the field of materials engineering are employed in industries that turn raw
materials into finished products. Materials engineering can be thought of as fitting in between mining
or chemical engineering (where raw materials are produced) and manufacturing (where final products
are made). Materials engineers design and select materials and materials-processing methods to fit a
particular product or application. Put simply, they define the best material for the job. Some engineers
Pdf_Folio:15
Mining engineering
Engineers who work in the field of mining engineering work with geologists to investigate and carry out
the extraction of ore bodies and mineral deposits, as well as the extraction of non-metallic ores and fuels
such as coal and uranium. They are responsible for planning the safest and most cost-effective way of
removing minerals from the ground, rivers or the sea bed. They may be involved with designing, installing
and supervising the use of explosives, ventilation equipment, and mining machinery and equipment, and
for inspecting the progress of mining operations.
Computerised techniques are often used in the development and operation of mines. Mining engi-
neers are responsible for protecting conditions for both people and the environment in the vicinity
of mines. They work both on mining sites and in the head and regional offices of mining compa-
nies. Experienced mining engineers have a wide range of career options including mine planning and
design, operations management, technical specialism, contracting, consulting, the mines inspectorate,
investment analysis and advice, research, tertiary education and general management. Mining engineers
use knowledge from other disciplines in their work (e.g. civil, electrical, mechanical engineering)
(Engineers Australia 2014).
While students have many different motivations for commencing an undergraduate degree in engineer-
ing, the prospect of a good salary is a strong motivator. On average, Australian engineering graduates can
initially expect to earn between $55 000 and $85 000 per annum (Engineers Australia 2017b; Professionals
Australia 2014) and in the most senior roles of Managing Director or CEO of an engineering firm, salaries
can range from $220 000 to $270 000 (Engineers Australia 2017b).
As the next section demonstrates, engineers can work in many different ways and can benefit from a
wide range of skills.
KEY POINT
Engineering graduates with a capacity for technical analysis and design, combined with well-developed
non-technical skills, will be valuable to a wide range of employers.
In order for undergraduate students and their teachers to understand what learning needs to take place
at Stage 1 Competency, Engineers Australia lists ‘indicators of attainment’ under each element. The
indicators are not mandated competencies, but provide examples of the quality of thinking that would prove
a graduate was competent in the specified element. The indicators of attainment for the communications
competency (element 3.2) are listed as 3.2 (a) and (b).
3.2 Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains.
(a) Is proficient in listening, speaking, reading and writing English, including:
• comprehending critically and fairly the viewpoints of others
• expressing information effectively and succinctly, issuing instruction, engaging in discussion,
presenting arguments and justification, debating and negotiating — to technical and non-
technical audiences and using textual, diagrammatic, pictorial and graphical media best suited
to the context
• representing an engineering position, or the engineering profession at large to the
broader community
• appreciating the impact of body language, personal behaviour and other non-verbal commu-
nication processes, as well as the fundamentals of human social behaviour and their cross-
cultural differences.
(b) Prepares high-quality engineering documents such as progress and project reports, reports of
investigations and feasibility studies, proposals, specifications, design records, drawings, technical
descriptions, and presentations pertinent to the engineering discipline (Engineers Australia 2017a).
These communication indicators have been outlined here because communication skills are a key
attribute according to engineering employers and professionals (Male et al. 2010). The need for engineers
to develop good communication skills will be looked at in more depth in the chapters on understanding
communication, communication skills and communicating information.
The assessment of graduating engineers’ mastery of the Stage 1 Competencies is embedded in the routine
assessment regime of the undergraduate degrees accredited by Engineers Australia. If you are studying an
Engineers Australia-accredited program, an important part of your faculty’s role is reporting to Engineers
Australia on how undergraduate students are taught and assessed to assure attainment of graduate
attributes. This means that you will be unlikely to have to sit an exam or test at the end of your degree to
prove your knowledge of the competencies for graduation. What is likely, however, is that some part of your
formal assessment in many of your engineering subjects will be devoted to assessing your attainment of the
Engineers Australia competencies. Engineers Australia does not expect that graduates will demonstrate a
Pdf_Folio:19
FIGURE 1.4 Signatory and provisional signatory countries to the Washington Accord, which allows mutual
recognition of engineering qualifications
Washington Accord
Signatories
• Australia — Represented by Engineers Australia (EA) (1989)
• Canada — Represented by Engineers Canada (EC) (1989)
• China — Represented by China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) (2016)
• Chinese Taipei — Represented by Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET) (2007)
• Hong Kong China — Represented by Hong Kong Institution of Engineers (HKIE) (1995)
• India — Represented by National Board of Accreditation (NBA) (2014)
• Ireland — Represented by Engineers Ireland (EI) (1989)
• Japan — Represented by Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education (JABEE) (2005)
• Korea — Represented by Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea (ABEEK) (2007)
• Malaysia — Represented by Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) (2009)
• New Zealand — Represented by Engineering New Zealand (EngNZ) (1989)
• Russia — Represented by Association for Engineering Education Russia (AEER) (2012)
• Singapore — Represented by Institution of Engineers Singapore (IES) (2006)
• South Africa — Represented by Engineering Council South Africa (ECSA) (1999)
• Sri Lanka — Represented by Institution of Engineers Sri Lanka (IESL) (2014)
• Turkey — Represented by Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Engineering Programs
(MÜDEK) (2011)
• United States — Represented by Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (1989)
• United Kingdom — Represented by Engineering Council United Kingdom (ECUK) (1989)
• Pakistan — Represented by Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) (2017)
• Peru — Represented by Instituto de Calidad Y Acreditacion de Programas de Computacion, Ingeneria
Y Technologia (ICACIT) (2018)
Provisional signatories
• Bangladesh — Represented by The Institution of Engineers Bangladesh (IEB)
• Costa Rica — Represented by Colegio Federado de Ingenieros y de Arquitectos de Costa Rica (CFIA)
• Mexico — Represented by Consejo de Acreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería (CACEI)
• Philippines — Represented by Philippine Technological Council (PTC)
• Chile — Represented by Agencia Acreditadora Colegio De Ingenieros De Chile S A (ACREDITA CI)
Source: International Engineering Alliance (2019).
1.3.1 Apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering
specialization . . . to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Pdf_Folio:20
The Engineering New Zealand and Engineers Australia graduate competency statements look very
similar, but each country has highlighted certain skills that feature more or less strongly in these
statements. For example, the Engineering New Zealand statement makes it clear that engineering graduates
from Engineering New Zealand programs will be skilled in ‘carrying out experiments’, whereas the
Engineers Australia standard does not mention experimentation. The two frameworks also describe the
‘communication’ competency in different ways, with the Engineers Australia description being longer,
and more detailed.
In addition to generic attributes, it is important engineering students build a strong knowledge of
the basics of engineering science. These are discussed in the next section, and provide the foundation
for the role engineers play in cooperating with other professionals to create technologies and processes
intended to improve society. Many of these are aligned with the Engineers Australia and Engineering
New Zealand competencies.
The following spotlight shows how interesting and varied engineering work can be, and the multicultural
and multidisciplinary teams involved.
SPOTLIGHT
It may not be the most glamorous topic for engineering innovation but a group of Australian engineering
researchers have helped develop an ingestible electronic pill that tracks the development of flatulence
through the human digestive tract.
The research team included specialists from the fields of biology, medicine, agriculture and electronics
engineering. Together, they developed a capsule that uses real-time tracking to monitor the presence of
oxygen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide gases, while travelling from the patient’s stomach to the colon. The
engineering contribution was essential to the device’s ability to measure and transmit gas development in
real time. The ingestible pill uses a combination of thermal conductivity and semiconducting sensors to
measure gut gases. The engineering team developed a method of adjusting the sensors’ heating elements
to provide accurate selectivity and sensitivity to different gases.
Pdf_Folio:21
Gas-impermeable
shell
Gas
sensor Batteries
Antennas
Temperature sensor
and microcontroller
Gas-permeable membrane
(c) (d)
9.8 mm
(0.39 in)
(1.03 in)
26 mm
(e)
Heating Gas
element sensor Coil
Microcontroller and antennas
signal processor
Coder Transmitter
Modulating
signal
Sampling at different heating element temperatures
(a) Three-dimensional rendering of the human gas sensing capsule sliced to demonstrate the internal
components. (b) Photo of the packaged gas capsule and receiver device. (c) Dimensions of the capsule.
(d) Schematic representation of intestinal gas penetration through the gas permeative membrane, reaching the
sensing elements. (e) Basic circuit diagram and operation of gas sensors in the capsule.
Source: Kalantar-Zaden et al. (2018).
Diseases of excessive or noxious flatulence can be distressing for suffers. Gases originate from the
complex interaction of ingested foods, digestive chemistry and the activity of gut microbes, which can
Pdf_Folio:22
KEY POINT
Basic concepts and laws of maths, physics and chemistry provide the building blocks for engineering
work.
Pdf_Folio:23
5.
Suur-inkvisiittori
»Päätä itse, kuka oli oikeassa: Sinäkö vai hän, joka silloin kyseli
Sinulta? Muista ensimmäistä kysymystä; sen sisällys, joskaan ei
kirjaimelleen, on seuraava: Sinä tahdot mennä maailmaan ja menet
paljain käsin, luvaten jonkinmoista vapautta, jota he
yksinkertaisuudessaan ja synnynnäisessä säädyttömyydessään
eivät kykene tajuamaankaan, jota he pelkäävät ja kauhistuvat, —
sillä ei mikään ole milloinkaan ollut ihmiselle ja inhimilliselle
yhteiskunnalle sietämättömämpää kuin vapaus! Näetkö nämä kivet
tässä alastomassa ja hehkuvan kuumassa erämaassa? Muuta ne
leiviksi, niin ihmiskunta juoksee Sinun jäljessäsi kuin lauma,
kiitollisena ja kuuliaisena, vaikkakin ikuisesti vavisten pelosta, että
Sinä vedät pois kätesi ja heiltä loppuvat Sinun leipäsi. Mutta Sinä et
tahtonut riistää ihmiseltä vapautta ja hylkäsit ehdotuksen, sillä mitä
vapautta se on, ajattelit Sinä, jos kuuliaisuus on ostettu leivillä? Sinä
sanoit, ettei ihminen elä ainoastaan leivästä, mutta tiedätkö Sinä,
että juuri tuon saman maisen leivän nimessä Sinua vastaan nousee
maan henki ja kamppailee kanssasi ja voittaa Sinut, ja kaikki
seuraavat sitä huutaen: 'Ken on tämän pedon kaltainen, hän on
antanut meille tulen taivaasta!' Tiedätkö Sinä, että kuluu vuosisatoja
ja ihmiskunta julistaa korkeimman viisautensa ja tieteensä suulla,
että rikosta ei ole olemassa ja ettei siis ole syntiäkään, vaan on
ainoastaan nälkäisiä. Ruoki ensin ja vaadi sitten vasta heiltä hyveitä!
näin kirjoitetaan lippuun, joka nostetaan Sinua vastaan ja joka saa
Sinun temppelisi sortumaan. Sinun temppelisi sijalle rakennetaan
uusi rakennus, rakennetaan uudelleen kauhea Baabelin torni, ja
vaikka sitäkään ei saada valmiiksi, niinkuin ei saatu valmiiksi
entistäkään, niin Sinä kuitenkin voisit välttää tuon uuden tornin
rakentamisen ja lyhentää ihmisten kärsimyksiä tuhannella vuodella,
— sillä meidän luoksemmehan he tulevat kiusattuaan itseään
tuhannen vuotta tornillaan! He etsivät silloin taas meidät käsiinsä
maan alta, katakombeista, missä me piileksimme (sillä me
joudumme taas vainojen ja kidutusten alaisiksi), he löytävät ja
huutavat meille: Ruokkikaa meitä, sillä ne, jotka lupasivat meille
tulen taivaasta, eivät sitä antaneet. Ja silloin me rakennamme
valmiiksi heidän torninsa, sillä valmiiksi kykenee sen rakentamaan
se, joka ruokkii, mutta ruokkia voimme vain me Sinun nimeesi ja me
valehtelemme, että se tapahtuu Sinun nimeesi. Oi, eivät koskaan,
eivät koskaan he saa ilman meitä ruokituksi itseään! Ei mikään tiede
anna heille leipää, niin kauan kuin he pysyvät vapaina, mutta
loppujen lopuksi he tuovat vapautensa meidän jalkojemme juureen
ja sanovat meille: Tehkää meidät mieluummin orjiksenne, kunhan
vain ruokitte meidät. He ymmärtävät viimein itse, että ei kukaan voi
ajatellakaan saavansa samalla kertaa yltäkyllin vapautta ja maallista
leipää, sillä koskaan, koskaan he eivät osaa jakaa niitä keskenään!
He tulevat niinikään vakuutetuiksi, että he eivät koskaan voi olla
vapaitakaan, sentähden että ovat vähäväkisiä, paheellisia,
mitättömiä ja kapinoitsijoita. Sinä olet luvannut heille taivaallista
leipää; mutta, toistan sen vieläkin, voiko se olla maallisen leivän
veroinen heikon, ikuisesti turmeltuneen ja ikuisesti kiittämättömän
ihmissuvun silmissä? Ja jos Sinua taivaallisen leivän nimessä
seuraavat tuhannet ja kymmenettuhannet, niin miten käy miljoonain
ja kymmenien miljoonain olentojen, jotka eivät jaksa hylätä maallista
leipää taivaallisen tähden? Vai ovatko Sinulle rakkaita ainoastaan
kymmenettuhannet suuret ja voimakkaat, mutta muitten miljoonien,
lukuisien kuin meren hieta, heikkojen, mutta Sinua rakastavien,
täytyy olla vain aineksina suuria ja voimakkaita varten? Ei, meille
ovat kalliita heikotkin. He ovat paheellisia ja kapinoitsijoita, mutta
lopulta heistä tulee myös kuuliaisia. He ihmettelevät meitä ja pitävät
meitä jumalina sen tähden, että me olemme suostuneet asettumaan
heidän johtoonsa ja kestämään vapauden, jota he pelästyivät, sekä
hallitsemaan heitä, — niin kauheata on heistä lopulta olla vapaa!
Mutta me sanomme olevamme kuuliaisia Sinulle ja hallitsevamme
Sinun nimeesi. Me petämme heitä taas, sillä Sinua me emme päästä
luoksemme. Tämä petos juuri onkin meidän kärsimyksemme, sillä
meidän on pakko valehdella. Kas, tätä merkitsee tuo ensimmäinen
erämaassa tehty kysymys, ja tämän Sinä olet hylännyt vapauden
nimessä, jonka olet asettanut yläpuolelle kaiken. Mutta tässäpä
kysymyksessä oli tämän maailman suuri salaisuus. Jos Sinä olisit
hyväksynyt 'leivät', niin Sinä olisit vastannut ihmisten, niin hyvin
yksilön kuin koko ihmiskunnankin, yhteiseen ja ikuiseen kaipuuseen,
— tuohon: 'Kenen eteen on kumartuminen?' Ei ole ihmisellä
ainaisempaa eikä kiduttavampaa huolta kuin vapaana ollen löytää
mahdollisimman pian se, jonka eteen voisi kumartua. Mutta ihminen
pyrkii kumartumaan sen eteen, mikä on kiistämätöntä, niin
kiistämätöntä, että kaikki ihmiset voisivat suostua yhdellä kertaa sitä
kumartamaan. Sillä näiden surkeiden olentojen huolena ei ole
ainoastaan se, että löytäisivät sen, jonka edessä minun tai toisen on
kumartuminen, vaan jotta löytäisivät semmoisen, että kaikki siihen
uskoisivat ja sen edessä kumartuisivat ja että tämän ehdottomasti
tekisivät kaikki yhdessä. Tämä tarve kumartua yhdessä on jokaisen
ihmisen suurimpana piinana ja samoin koko ihmiskunnan aikojen
alusta asti. Yhteisen kumartamisen tähden he ovat tuhonneet
toisiansa miekalla. He ovat pystyttäneet jumalia ja kehoittaneet
toisiansa: Hylätkää omat jumalanne ja tulkaa kumartamaan meidän
jumaliamme, muuten te olette jumalinenne kuoleman omat! Ja näin
tulee olemaan maailman loppuun asti, vieläpä silloinkin, kun jumalat
katoavat maailmasta: samantekevää, he lankeavat epäjumalien
eteen. Sinä olet tuntenut, Sinä et ole voinut olla tuntematta tätä
ihmisluonnon perussalaisuutta, mutta Sinä hylkäsit ainoan
absoluuttisen lipun, joka Sinulle tarjottiin, kaikkien saattamiseksi
kiittämättä kumartumaan Sinun edessäsi — maisen leivän lipun, ja
hylkäsit sen vapauden ja taivaallisen leivän nimessä. Luohan
silmäys siihen, mitä Sinä vielä olet tehnyt. Ja edelleenkin vapauden
nimessä! Sanon Sinulle, että ihmisellä ei ole piinallisempaa huolta,
kuin että löytäisi sen, jolle mitä pikimmin voisi antaa lahjaksi
saamansa vapauden, joka tällä onnettomalla olennolla on
syntyessään. Mutta ihmisten vapauden saa valtaansa ainoastaan se,
joka rauhoittaa heidän omantuntonsa. Leivän kanssa Sinulle
annettiin kiistämätön lippu: jos annat leivän, niin ihminen kumartuu,
sillä ei ole mitään kiistämättömämpää kuin leipä, mutta jos samaan
aikaan joku saa valtaansa hänen omantuntonsa Sinut sivuuttaen, —
oi, silloin ihminen hylkää Sinun leipäsikin ja seuraa sitä, jonka
onnistui miellyttää hänen omaatuntoaan. Siinä Sinä olit oikeassa.
Sillä ihmiselämän salaisuus ei ole siinä, että vain elää, vaan siinä,
mitä varten elää. Ilman lujaa mielikuvaa siitä, mitä varten hänen on
elettävä, ihminen ei tahdo elää ja hän tuhoaa mieluummin itsensä
kuin jää maan päälle, vaikka hänen ympärillään joka puolella olisikin
leipiä. Se on niin, mutta kuinka kävi: sen sijaan, että olisit ottanut
valtaasi ihmisten vapauden, Sinä lisäsit heille vielä sitä! Vai unhotitko
Sinä, että rauha ja kuolemakin ovat ihmiselle rakkaammat kuin
vapaa valinta hyvän ja pahan tietämisessä. Ei ole ihmiselle mitään
imartelevampaa kuin omantunnonvapaus, mutta ei ole myöskään
mitään kiduttavampaa. Lujien perusteitten asemesta ihmisen
omantunnon rauhoittamiseksi kerta kaikkiaan — Sinä otit kaiken sen,
mikä on tavatonta, arveluun perustuvaa ja epämääräistä, otit kaiken
sen, mikä ei ollut ihmisten voimien mukaista, ja näin toimit aivan kuin
et ollenkaan heitä rakastaisi, — ja kuka toimi näin: se, joka tuli
antamaan heidän puolestaan henkensä! Sen sijaan että olisit ottanut
valtaasi ihmisen vapauden, Sinä sen moninkertaistutit ja panit sen
kärsimykset ikuisiksi ajoiksi painamaan ihmisen henkistä
valtakuntaa. Sinä halusit vapaata ihmisen rakkautta, että hän
vapaasti seuraisi Sinua hurmaantuneena ja kiintyneenä Sinuun.
Vanhan vankan lain asemesta — oli ihmisen nyt tästä lähin vapaasta
sydämestään päätettävä, mikä on hyvää ja mikä pahaa, ohjeenaan
ainoastaan Sinun kuvasi silmiensä edessä, — mutta etkö Sinä
todellakaan ajatellut, että hän lopulta hylkää ja riistää myöskin Sinun
kuvasi ja Sinun totuutesi, jos hänet näännytetään niin kauhean
taakan alle kuin on valinnan vapaus! He huudahtavat viimein, että
totuus ei ole Sinussa, sillä mahdotonta oli jättää heidät suurempaan
levottomuuteen ja piinaan kuin mitä Sinä olit tehnyt, kun jätit heille
niin paljon huolia ja selvittämättömiä arvoituksia. Näin olet Sinä itse
pannut alulle oman valtakuntasi kukistuksen, äläkä syytä siitä enää
ketään. Mutta tätäkö Sinulle esitettiin? On kolme voimaa, vain kolme
voimaa maan päällä, jotka voivat ainaiseksi voittaa ja vangita näitten
heikkovoimaisten kapinoitsijain omantunnon heidän onnekseen, —
ne voimat ovat: ihme, salaisuus ja auktoriteetti. Sinä hylkäsit kaikki
kolme ja annoit siihen itse esimerkin. Kun peloittava ja viisas henki
asetti Sinut temppelin harjalle ja sanoi Sinulle: 'Jos tahdot tietää,
oletko Jumalan poika, niin heittäydy alas, sillä Hänestä on sanottu,
että enkelit ottavat ja kantavat hänet eikä hän putoa eikä
loukkaannu, ja silloin Sinä saat tietää, oletko Jumalan poika, ja
osoitat silloin, millainen on uskosi isääsi', niin Sinä kuultuasi
ehdotuksen hylkäsit sen etkä antautunut etkä heittäytynyt alas. Oi,
tietysti Sinä tässä menettelit ylpeästi ja suurenmoisesti Jumalana,
mutta ihmiset, tämä heikko ja kapinoiva suku, — ovatko he jumalia?
Oi, Sinä ymmärsit silloin, että jos olisit ottanut vain askelenkin, vain
liikahtanutkin heittäytyäksesi alas, niin Sinä samalla olisit kiusannut
Jumalaa ja kadottanut kaiken uskosi Häneen sekä murskaantunut
maata vastaan, tuota maata, jota pelastamaan olit tullut, ja Sinua
kiusannut viisas henki olisi riemastunut. Mutta, sanon sen vieläkin,
paljonko on sellaisia kuin Sinä? Ja saatoitko Sinä edes hetkenkään
ajan todellakin otaksua, että ihmisetkin jaksavat kestää tämmöisen
kiusauksen! Semmoiseksiko on ihmisluonto luotu, että se voi hylätä
ihmeen ja noin kauheina elämän hetkinä, kaikista kauheimpien ja
piinallisimpien henkisten peruskysymystensä hetkinä, tyytyä vain
sydämen vapaaseen ratkaisuun? Oi, Sinä tiesit, että Sinun
sankaritekosi säilyy kirjoissa, tunkeutuu aikojen syvyyteen ja maan
kaukaisimpiin ääriin, ja Sinä toivoit, että ihminen seuraten Sinua
pysyy Jumalana eikä tarvitse ihmettä. Mutta sinä et tietänyt, että heti
kun ihminen hylkää ihmeen, hän samalla hylkää myös Jumalan, sillä
ihminen ei etsi niin paljon Jumalaa kuin ihmeitä. Ja koska ihminen ei
jaksa olla ilman ihmettä, niin hän luo itselleen uusia, omia ihmeitä ja
kumartaa poppamiehen ihmeitä, ämmien noitatemppuja, vaikka hän
olisi sata kertaa kapinoitsija, kerettiläinen ja jumalankieltäjä. Sinä et
tullut alas ristiltä, kun Sinulle pilkaten ja ärsytellen huudettiin: 'Tule
alas ristiltä, niin me uskomme, että se olet Sinä.' Sinä et tullut alas
sen tähden, että taaskaan et tahtonut orjuuttaa ihmistä ihmeellä ja
että janosit vapaata uskoa etkä ihmeisiin rakentuvaa. Sinä janosit
vapaaehtoista rakkautta etkä epävapaan orjamaisia ihastuksen
purkauksia voiman edessä, joka kerta kaikkiaan oli hänet
kauhistuttanut. Mutta tässäkin Sinä arvioit ihmiset liian korkealle, sillä
tietysti he ovat vankeja, vaikka heidät onkin luotu kapinoitsijoiksi.
Katso ympärillesi ja päätä, nyt kun on kulunut viisitoista vuosisataa,
mene ja katso heitä: kenet Sinä olet kohottanut itsesi tasalle? Minä
vannon, että ihminen on luotu heikommaksi ja alhaisemmaksi kuin
Sinä olet hänestä luullut! Voiko, voiko hän täyttää sen, minkä
Sinäkin? Pitäessäsi häntä niin suuressa arvossa Sinä olet menetellyt
niinkuin olisit lakannut säälimästä häntä, sillä liian paljon olet häneltä
vaatinutkin — ja kuka vaati: se, joka on rakastanut häntä enemmän
kuin itseään! Jos olisit pitänyt häntä vähemmän arvoisena, niin olisit
häneltä vähemmän vaatinutkin, mutta tämä olisi ollut lähempänä
rakkautta, sillä hänen kuormansa olisi ollut kevyempi. Hän on heikko
ja alhainen. Mitäpä siitä, että hän nyt kaikkialla kapinoi meidän
valtaamme vastaan ja ylpeilee siitä, että hän kapinoi? Se on lapsen
ja koulupojan ylpeyttä. He ovat pieniä lapsia, jotka koulussa ovat
tehneet kapinan ja karkoittaneet opettajan, mutta lapsien riemusta
tulee loppu ja se käy heille kalliiksi. He kukistavat temppelit ja
peittävät maan verivirroilla. Mutta viimein he, tyhmät lapset,
ymmärtävät, että vaikka he ovatkin kapinoitsijoita, niin he ovat
vähäväkisiä kapinoitsijoita eivätkä kykene ylläpitämään omaa
kapinaansa. Vuodattaen typeriä kyyneliään he viimein tunnustavat,
että se, joka on luonut heidät kapinoitsijoiksi, epäilemättä on tahtonut
pitää heitä pilkkanaan. He sanovat tämän epätoivoissaan, ja tuosta
heidän sanastaan tulee Jumalan pilkkaamista, joka tekee heidät
vielä onnettomammiksi, sillä ihmisluonto ei siedä Jumalan
pilkkaamista, vaan kostaa loppujen lopuksi itse itselleen sen. Siis
rauhattomuus, hämminki ja onnettomuus — siinä on ihmisten
nykyinen kohtalo, sen jälkeen kuin Sinä niin paljon kärsit heidät
vapautensa tähden! Sinun suuri profeettasi sanoo näyssä ja
kuvauspuheessa, että hän on nähnyt kaikki ensimmäisessä
ylösnousemuksessa mukana olleet ja että heitä oli jokaisesta
polvesta kaksitoistatuhatta. Mutta jos heitä oli niin paljon, niin he
oikeastaan eivät olleet ihmisiä, vaan jumalia. He ovat kestäneet
Sinun ristisi, he ovat kestäneet kymmeniä vuosia ilman ravintoa
autiossa erämaassa elättäen henkeään heinäsirkoilla ja juurilla, — ja
tietysti Sinä voit ylpeillen osoittaa näitä vapauden lapsia,
vapaaehtoisen rakkauden, vapaan ja suuren, Sinun nimeesi
osoitetun uhrautuvaisuuden lapsia. Mutta muista, että heitä oli
kaikkiaan vain muutamia tuhansia, nekin jumalia. Entä muut? Ja
miten ovat syyllisiä muut heikot ihmiset, kun eivät kyenneet
kärsimään sitä, mitä voimakkaat? Onko heikko sielu syyllinen, kun
siinä eivät voi saada sijaa niin kauheat lahjat? Tulitko Sinä todellakin
ainoastaan valittujen luo ja valittuja varten? Mutta jos niin on, niin
tässä on salaisuus, emmekä me pysty sitä ymmärtämään. Jos taas
se on salaisuus, niin meilläkin oli oikeus saarnata salaisuutta ja
opettaa heille, ettei heidän sydäntensä vapaa ratkaisu ole tärkeä
eikä myöskään rakkaus ole tärkeä, vaan tärkeä on salaisuus, johon
heidän on alistuttava sokeasti, vieläpä vastoin omaatuntoaankin. Niin
olemme tehneetkin. Me olemme parantaneet Sinun sankaritekosi ja
panneet sen pohjaksi ihmeen, salaisuuden ja auktoriteetin. Ja
ihmiset ilostuivat, että heitä oli jälleen alettu kuljettaa kuin laumaa ja
että heidän sydämiltään vihdoinkin oli otettu niin kauhea lahja, joka
oli tuottanut heille niin paljon tuskaa. Olimmeko me oikeassa, kun
opetimme ja teimme niin, sano? Emmekö me rakastaneet
ihmiskuntaa, kun me niin nöyrästi tunnustimme sen
voimattomuuden, rakkaudella kevensimme sen taakkaa ja
annoimme sen heikon luontonsa tähden tehdä vaikkapa syntiäkin,
jos se tapahtui meidän luvallamme? Miksi siis nyt olet tullut
häiritsemään meitä? Ja miksi Sinä ääneti ja läpitunkevasti katsot
minua lempeillä silmilläsi? Vihastu, minä en tahdo Sinun rakkauttasi,
sillä minä itse en rakasta Sinua. Ja mitä minun tarvitsee salata
Sinulta? Enkö minä tiedä, kenen kanssa puhun? Se, mitä minulla on
Sinulle sanottavaa, on kaikki jo tiedossasi, minä luen sen Sinun
silmistäsi. Ja minäkö kätkisin Sinulta salaisuutemme? Kenties Sinä
nimenomaan tahdotkin kuulla sen minun suustani, kuule siis: me
emme ole Sinun puolellasi, vaan hänen, siinä on salaisuutemme! Me
emme pitkään aikaan ole olleet Sinun puolellasi, vaan hänen
puolellaan, jo kahdeksan vuosisataa. Täsmälleen kahdeksan
vuosisataa sitten me otimme häneltä sen, minkä Sinä paheksuen
hylkäsit, sen viimeisen lahjan, jonka hän tarjosi Sinulle, kun hän
näytti Sinulle kaikki maan valtakunnat; me otimme häneltä Rooman
ja keisarin miekan ja julistimme itsemme maan hallitsijoiksi, ainoiksi
hallitsijoiksi, vaikka emme ole ennättäneet vieläkään saattaa
asiaamme täydellisesti loppuun. Mutta kuka on syypää? Oi, tämä
asia on toistaiseksi vasta alulla, mutta se on jo aloitettu. Kauan on
vielä odotettava sen täydellistä toteutumista, ja paljon saa maa vielä
kärsiä, mutta me saavutamme päämäärämme ja tulemme
hallitsijoiksi, ja silloin me ajattelemme koko maailman ihmisten
onnea. Mutta Sinähän olisit voinut jo silloin ottaa keisarin miekan.
Miksi sinä hylkäsit tämän viimeisen lahjan? Jos olisit ottanut
noudattaaksesi tätä mahtavan hengen kolmatta neuvoa, niin Sinä
olisit täyttänyt kaiken, mitä ihminen maan päällä etsii, se on: kenen
edessä kumartuisi, kenen valtaan antaisi omantuntonsa ja millä
tavoin kaikki yhtyisivät lopulta kiistämättömästi yhteiseksi ja
sopuisaksi muurahaispesäksi, sillä tarve saada koko maailma
yhtymään yhdeksi on ihmisten kolmas ja viimeinen piina. Aina on
ihmiskunta kokonaisuudessaan pyrkinyt järjestymään ehdottomasti
yleismaailmalliselle pohjalle. Paljon on ollut suuria kansoja, joilla on
ollut suuri historia, mutta kuta korkeammalla nämä kansat ovat
olleet, sitä onnellisempia ne ovat olleet, sitä voimakkaammin kuin
muut ne ovat tunteneet tarpeen saada ihmiset yhtymään koko
maailman käsittäväksi yhteydeksi. Suuret valloittajat, Timurit ja
Tšingis-Kaanit, ovat kiitäneet kuin myrskytuuli yli maan pyrkien
valloittamaan koko maailman, mutta hekin ovat, vaikka tiedottomasti,
tuoneet ilmi ihmiskunnan saman suuren tarpeen yhdistyä koko