M.V.P.

SAMAJ’S LAW COLLEGE

GANGAPUR ROAD, NASHIK

Practical Training Taper – IV

MOOT COURT = YEAR 2024-24
CASE TYPE :- CIVIL CASE
Breach of contract and related issues

Name of the parties:

Jaywant patil……………………...(PLAINTIFF)

V/S

S M fruit supplier PVT LTD …………………….

(DEFENDANT)
 NAME : waje omkar chandrabhan
CLASS : LL.B -THIRD YEAR (SEM-VI)
PRESENTATION : MOOT COURT MEMORIAL
ROLE : Plaintiff

MOOT COURT MEMORIAL

YEAR 2024-24

NAME :- Omkar chandrabhan waje

CLASS :- LL.B-THIRD YEAR (SEM-

VI)

PRESENTATION :- MOOT COURT – MEMORIAL

PREDENTED BEFORE :- DR. SANDHYA GADAKH

(Practical Training Faculty In charge)
Principal Student

DR. SANDHYA GADAKH Omkar waje

LL.B-THIRD YEAR
Subject Name :-

LP-1004.PRACTICAL TRANING PAPER IV

MOOT COURT EXERCISE & INTERNSHIP

MOOT COURT PRESENTATION GROUP

1) MR. Omkar waje

2) MR. Shabir rangrej
3) Miss.Pallavi hapse
4) Miss.Ashwini walunj
 THE HON’BLE DISTRICT COURT OF
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NASHIK

STUDENT PVT LTD

……………………….(PLAINTIFF)

V/S

BAGS AND BAGS PVT LTD

…………………….(DEFENDANT)’

Principal
Student

DR. SANDHYA GADAKH GAYATRI BELHEKAR

LL.B-THIRD YEAR
 STATEMENT OF plaintiff

1. A Company the name SM fruit supplier Pvt. Ltd. (SPL),

(hereafter “The defendant”) is running a business of
supllying fruits and has earned good name and reputation
of the quality FRUITS it supply in the respective segment.
2. The Plaintiff entered into a contract for the purchase of
mangoes. The contract price was Rs.2,00,000/- and both
the parties agreed upon a payment schedule. The Plaintiff
agreed to pay Rs.120,000/ partially upon the full delivery
of goods on 25st may 2022 and a full and final payment of
balance amount of Rs.80,000 on 1st july 2022.
3. The Defendant delivered the Mangoes to the Plaintiff on
the agreed date i.e. 25 may 2022 as per the contract but did
not supply the good quality as per the contract as per the
agreement however, shortly after taking the delivery of the
mangoes, the Plaintiff loses a profitable contract with its
large booking agents which resulted in a significant down
in the demand for their fruits. The defendant, was also
suffering from financial difficulties due to a number of
legal actions brought against it.
4. It was realized by the defendant, that the Plaintiff would
be unable to pay the remaining amount of Rs.80,000 on 1st
july 2022.
5. On delivery it was found that the fruits were of poor
quality and immediately on 1st August 2022 a notice was
sent to the defendant, to Re-supply the fruits. The notice
was acknowledged by the defendant. however, No Re-
supply took place nor any action from their side. On 15th
august 2022. The notice was sent by the plaintiff which
was neither acknowledged nor replied.
6. Hence, the plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant and
claims Rs. 80,000 /- as damages for breach of contract.
The defendant contended that it was not bound to pay the
amount claimed in the suit because the fruits were of good
quality.
7. Prayer –
1.Plaintiff request to the honable court that the goods.i.e
mangoes delivered by the defendant are partially not as in
good quality as described as at the time of the contract.
Because of that incidence, plaintiff have face loss of
amount 1,00,000/- Rupees and got mentally harassed.
So plaintiff has prayer to the