Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.artoflean.com
TPS Development Timeline
Western Influences:
Taiichi
Mass Production & TPS Development Ohno
moving conveyor lines Loom Business Automotive Company
Standardization
Of Parts
Many Others….
My Translation:
Improvement is not an accident and usually will not happen naturally.
We as leaders must shape the conditions to help make it occur…
Leadership Shaping Principles Framework
7 QC Tools & Benkei Analogy
Benkei 7 QC Tools Kaoru Ishikawa
1. Data Collection / Check sheets
2. Cause-and-effect diagram
Professor Emeritus
7. Scatter diagram University of Tokyo
4 Types of Problem Situations
Genesis of the Expert
Kolb Learning Styles
Type 1 Type 3 / 4
Problem Solving Problem Solving
Tendency Tendency
Type 2 / 3 Type 2
Problem Tendency Problem Tendency
Logic Driven Data Driven
Situational Leadership Model
D1 / S1 = Directing
D2 / S2 = Coaching
D3 / S3 = Supporting
D4 / S4 = Delegating
Lean Learning Session Outline
Accommodating Diverging
(feel and do) Percep (feel and watch)
CE/AE -tion CE/RO
Contin-
uum
Active how we Reflective
Processing Continuum
Experimentation think Observation
how we do things
Doing about Watching
things
Converging Assimilating
(think and do) (think and watch)
AC/AE AC/RO
Abstract
Conceptualisation
Thinking
Learning Style Types
ACCOMODATOR DIVERGER
Combines Combines
Concrete Experience Concrete Experience
(CE) (CE)
With With
Active Experimentation Reflective Observation
(AE) (RO)
CONVERGER ASSIMILATOR
Combines Combines
Abstract Conceptualization Reflective Observation (RO)
(AC) With
With Abstract Conceptualization
Active Experimentation (AC)
(AE)
Learning Style Nicknames / PDCA
ACCOMODATOR DIVERGER
The Organizer / Doer The Reflector / Imaginator
PD CA
PD CA
CONVERGER ASSIMILATOR
PDCA PC D A
9 Paths In the Learning Styles
ACCOMODATOR
DIVERGER
Imagining/
Initiating Experiencing
Visioning
ASSIMILATOR
CONVERGER
GAP Type 3 -
“Target State”
Type 1 Type 3 / 4
Problem Solving Problem Solving
Action Tendency Possibility Tendency
Type 2 / 3 Type 2
Problem Solving Problem Solving
Logic Driven Tendency Data Driven Tendency
Lean Learning Session Outline
• Enthusiastic, excited,
optimistic
• Discouraged, overhelmed,
confused
• Unreliable, inconsistent
D3 Reluctant Contributor
• Is generally self-directed but needs
opportunities to test ideas with
others
The goal is to
match style and need
S1 D1
S2 D2
S3 D3
S4 D4
Over time, with a match,
individuals learn to provide
their own direction and
support
Partnering for Performance
The goal is a
proper match
Over-supervision
S1/S2 D3/D4
Under-supervision
S3/S4 D1/D2
Both over-supervision &
under-supervision gives
the same result:
Decrease in Motivation
Leadership Shaping Principles
LSP Framework
Toyota Foundational Precepts
What do these
environments tell us?
Shape the Environment
Innovation Team Leaders Meetings
LSP Framework
Organizational Structure Operations
工場長 Plant Leader 1 In general there
is a 1 to 5
部長 Department Leader 5 leadership ratio
Ops. Leader
PRE-PROMOTION
GROUP LEADER
POST-PROMOTION
A3 Writing Course
GROUP LEADER
PRE-PROMOTION Lectures and Study Groups “Jisshyuken”
In person
Cross functional
Obeya style
Visual information
Training
People Relations
Methods
Quality
Product Features
Cost
Standards
Process Maintenance
Characteristics
Problem = Gap from standard or expected outcome
Kaizen = True sustainable improvement above and beyond the standard
Shape the Thinking Pattern
Shape the Thinking Pattern
Level of Detail
Seconds
Steps
Motions
Work Elements
Level of Detail
Micron (.001 mm)
Cpk > 2.33 Capability
<10 Defects Per Million
4 Types of Problem Situations
5 Why Thinking Pattern
Problem Solving Report / A3
Problem Background Countermeasures
Problem Definition
Taiichi Ohno
• Courage
• Creativity
• Challenge
Eiji Toyoda
Shape the Behaviors & Actions
Level of Detail
Seconds
Steps
Motions
Work Elements
Hourly Team Leader Checks