Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategic Management
Caleb Tse
Strategy, IB and Entrepreneurship Division
Nanyang Business School
Nanyang Technological University
AY2023-24 S2
Agenda
Explain Porter’s Generic Business-level Strategies
• What is Business Strategy?
• Strategic Business Units
• Business Strategy Choice – 2 Dimensions (Scope & Advantage)
• Business Models
• 5 Generic Strategies
• Determining Business-level Strategies
• Competitor Analysis – Market Commonality & Resource Similarity
FORMULATION /
ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION
STRATEGIC CHOICES
Strategic Business
Corporate level
Unit (SBU) level
Product / market /
distinctive competence
domain
Supplies goods or services for a
distinct domain of activity
Business Strategy
Rothaermel, 2017
Strategic Business Units
SBU
Power rangers
Toys and hobby
Tamagotchi
Corporate
Arcade games
Game contents
Creation of games
Sales
Animation
Visual and music
Music publishing
Strategic Business Units:
Core Functions & Key Choices
• Decentralization
• No need to continuously seek approval from corporate
• Information asymmetry between SBU and HQ
• Localization
• Adjusting business strategies according to local environment
• Corporate may be too distant to do this effectively
• Accountability
• SBU managers responsible for the success/failure of their strategies (i.e., market
share, profitability, sales etc.)
Perceived
Value (V):
Willingness to
pay (WTP) Consumer
Value Surplus
created =V-P
Price (P)
=V-C
Profit
=P-C
Cost (C)
Business Models
❖ Business models are part of a comprehensive business-level
strategy.
❖ A business model influences strategy implementation, especially in
terms of the interdependent processes the firm uses during
implementation.
❖ A business model describes what a firm does to create, deliver, and
capture value for its stakeholders.
21
Generic Strategy or Business Strategy
Comparison of Cost Leadership and Differentiation Strategies
Cost Leadership Differentiation
Strategy At the lowest cost At the highest real and perceived value
Lower the price to the highest level of Raise the price to the highest
the largest market scale willingness to pay of the largest market
scale
This is the
challenge: To
maintain an
acceptable level
of differentiation
Rothaermel, 2017
Cost Leadership Strategy
❖ Economies of scale
• They exist when the cost per unit decreases as the
output increases.
Spread fixed
costs over
large output
Rothaermel, 2017
Cost Driver:
Learning and Experience Curve
❖ Learning and Experience curve effects
Rothaermel, 2017
Sources: Based on M. E. Porter, 1998, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, The Free Press; D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, & R. D. Ireland, 2007, Managing firm resources in
dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box, Academy of Management Review, 32: 273–292; D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, & B. A. Gilbert, 2011, Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage:
Breadth, depth and life cycles effects, Journal of Management, 37, 1390–1412; J. S. Harrison, 2020, Sustaining High Performance in Business: Systems, Resources, and Relationships, New York, Business Expert Press.
Differentiation Strategy
❖ The goal: to add unique features that will increase the perceived
value of goods and services (at an acceptable cost)
• Focus on unique features, new products or marketing campaigns.
• Helps the firm charge higher prices, while trying to keep the cost structure
low
❖ Competitive advantage is achieved when the economic value
created (V-C) is greater than that of competitors
❖ Differentiation helps a firm to protect itself from competition
because customers have preferences and loyalties to certain sellers
Differentiation Strategy
This is the
challenge: To
contain cost while
increasing value
Rothaermel, 2017
Differentiation Strategy:
Differentiation (Value) Drivers
Sources: Based on M. E. Porter, 1998, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, The Free Press; D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, & R. D. Ireland, 2007, Managing firm resources in dynamic
environments to create value: Looking inside the black box, Academy of Management Review, 32: 273–292; D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, & B. A. Gilbert, 2011, Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth
and life cycles effects, Journal of Management, 37, 1390–1412; J. S. Harrison, 2020, Sustaining High Performance in Business: Systems, Resources, and Relationships, New York, Business Expert Press.
Generic Business Strategy & Five Forces
Risks of Cost Leadership
34
Risks of Differentiation
❖ A customer group’s decision that a differentiated product’s
unique features are no longer worth a premium price.
❖ The inability of a differentiated product to create the type of
value for which customers are willing to pay a premium price.
❖ The ability of competitors to provide customers with products
that have features similar to those of the differentiated product
but at a lower cost.
❖ Counterfeiting
❖ The failure of a firm to meet customers’ expectations through its
efforts to implement the differentiation strategy.
35
Focused & Integrated Strategies
36
Definitions
❖ Focus Strategy:
An integrated set of actions taken to produce goods or services
that serve the needs of a particular competitive segment
❖ Define the market, today, usually refers to defining a unique segment
❖ Integrated Strategy:
Engaging in primary value chain activities and support functions
that allow a firm to simultaneously pursue low cost and
differentiation
37
Focus Strategies
Another
Example
Focused Differentiation Strategy
42
Integrated Strategy
Rothaermel, 2017
Integrated Strategy: Dual Advantage?
RISK: Stuck in the Middle!
Porter suggests:
❖ It is best to choose whichever generic strategy to adopt and then stick
rigorously to it
❖ Failure to do this leads to a danger of being ‘stuck in the middle’ i.e.
doing no strategy well
49
Determining Business-level Strategy 1
❖ Understand the value drivers of the customers
❖ Conduct Market Segmentation
❖ Group customers based on their value drivers (i.e., important and
significant differences in their needs, attitudes, and buying practices)
❖ Consumer buyers (e.g., demographics, socioeconomic, consumption patterns,
etc)
❖ Industrial buyers (e.g., size, geography, end-use, etc)
❖ After market segmentation, the firm can:
❖ develop a product to suit the needs of each customer grouping OR
❖ concentrate on one customer grouping
50
Determining Business-level Strategy 2
❖ Examine the attractiveness of the segment(s)
❖ Attractiveness of Market Segments
❖ Tools in external environment analyses will be useful in determining
environmental opportunities and threats and, thus, segment
attractiveness. For instance
❖ Porter’s Five Forces Model
❖ General Environment Analysis
❖ Generally, a firm should choose to compete in a more attractive
market segment or segments (provided the firm has the necessary
resources and capabilities to have a sustainable competitive advantage
in that segment or segments)
51
Determining Business-level Strategy 3
❖ Examine internal strengths and weaknesses
❖ Based on the value drivers of the customer segment and results of the
external analyses (e.g., opportunities and threats of that segment), a firm
should determine what is the most appropriate business strategy to
compete in that segment.
❖ Assessment of Internal Strengths and Weaknesses
❖ Feasibility Test:
Does the firm have the available resources/capabilities to execute the intended
business strategy?
❖ Test of Sustainable Competitive Advantage:
Do those resources/capabilities provide a sustainable competitive advantage?
52
Quantitative analysis
to supplement evaluation of business strategy
53
Model of Competitive Rivalry
Source: Adapted from M. J. Chen, 1996, Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration, Academy of Management Review, 21: 100–134.
54
Market Commonality
❖ Market commonality is concerned with the number of markets with which
the firm and a competitor are jointly involved and the degree of importance
of the individual markets to each.
❖ Firms competing against one another in several markets engage in
multipoint competition.
❖ In general, multipoint competition reduces competitive rivalry, but some
firms will still engage in attacks when the potential rewards (e.g., potential
market share gain) are high.
55
Resource Similarity
❖ Resource similarity is the extent to which the firm’s tangible and intangible
resources compare favorably to a competitor’s in terms of type and amount.
❖ Firms with similar types and amounts of resources tend to:
❖ Have similar strengths and weaknesses.
❖ Use similar strategies in light of their strengths to pursue what may be similar
opportunities in the external environment.
56
Competitor Analysis
57
See you next week