Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Indian History Congress is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Proceedings of the Indian History Congress
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
242 INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS
Johannes Voigt
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 243
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
244 INDIAN HISTORY CONGRBSS
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 245
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
246 INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS
After the middle of the nineteenth century, and more clearly since
the beginning of the sixties, a growing reaction against "rationalism" can
be observed. This reaction takes the form of a greater interest in the
history of the country, of a new evaluation of traditions and customs,
and of a new appreciation of the mother tongue.
The reaction against "rationalism" was also a reaction against
foreign influence. In my opinion, the causes must be found in a dis-
appointment after the introduction of English education and the effects
of the events of 1857, which, although not a national uprising, was a
turning point of national significance. Besides these "negative" causes
there were "positive" ones, which brought about the change : the
"undigging" of the past and the proof by press and literature, that
Indian languages are as good a medium of expression of ideas and
emotions in literary works as the English language.
As an example of this reaction, the words of Sisirkumar Ghosh,
which be wrote in 1870, may be taken: "India is a civilization of its
own. It is a distinct country from England, and its people have
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 247
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
248 INDIAN HISTORY CONG&ESS
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 249
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
250 INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 251
v. CONCLUSION
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
252 INDIAN HISTORY CONGRESS
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
MODERN INDIA 253
8 Ibid.. P. 571
9 Susobhan Chandra Sarkar, Derozio
Bengal Renaissance, ed. by A. Gupta, J
10 Quoted by Bimanbehari Majumdar, History of Political Thought from
Rammohun Roy to Dayananda (1821-84), Vol. I: Bengal, Calcutta 1934, PP. 337 f.
11 Ibid., P. 371
12 Ibid., P. 336
13 R. C. Majumdar, Three Phases of India s Struggle for Freedom, Bombay
■961, P. 7.
14 Quoted by Bimanbehari Majumdar, op. cit., P. 318.
15 Quoted by Bimanbehari Majumdar, op. cit., P. 294.
16 Bimanbehari Majumdar, op. cit., P. 428.
17 Ibid., P. 414
18 Ibid., P. 411
19 / bid., P. 431
20 Bimanbehari Majumdar, op. cit., P. 417
^English translation of "Bande Mataram'* in: Sources of Indian Tradition,
pp. 711 f.
22 Presidential Addresses of the Indian National Congress, (1885-1910), Madras
1934, p. 96.
23 R. C. Majumdar, op. cit., p. 27.
04Bipin Chandra Pal, The Soul of India, 4th ed., Calcutta 1958, pp. 102 f.
25 Quoted by Haridas and Uma Mukherjee, Sri Aurobindo's Political Thought
(1893-1908), Calcutta 1958, p. 41.
26 Quoted by Haridas and Uma Mukherjee, op. cit., p. 58.
27 Cp. Vishwanath Prasad Varma, The Political Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo,
Bombay, 1960, and by the same author: Modern Indian Political Thought, Agra
1961, pp. 390 ff.
28 Cp. V. P. Varma, Modern Indian Political Thought, pp. 373 ff.
29 Nemai Sadhan Bose, The Indian Awakening and Bengal, Calcutta 1960,
treats the subject of Indian nationalism in the 19th century by describing the
different movements, elucational, social, religious, but by giving an analysis of
nationalism, based upon sources.
Dietmar Rothermund
Reform and repression indicated the two ways in which the Britis
rulers reacted to the rising tide of national aspirations in India.
reforms were so designed as to disperse and mollify the forces of unr
while the repressive measures were supposed to "frighten the waverer
Rigorous centralisation had made the British-Indian governme
formidable and efficient but also very vulnerable, because the rising fo
of nationalism were encouraged by the very structure of the state to f
into the same unitarian mould. At the same time the centralisation
restricted the influence and the discretionary powers of the "man on the
spot", and the government lost touch with grassroot-politics. The
This content downloaded from 35.154.245.7 on Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:46:28 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms