Trump criminal case: Jury selection reaches final stage

9 hours ago
By Madeline Halpert & Kayla Epstein,
BBC News, in court

Share

0:32
Watch: Trump complains about 'freezing' New York courtroom
Jury selection in Donald Trump's historic criminal trial is in its final stage -
raising hopes that opening statements could be made on Monday.

A full 12-person panel has been sworn in, and six alternate jurors are being sought
to act as reserves if needed.

Mr Trump is accused of falsifying business records in the first criminal trial of

an ex-president. He denies it.

Finding an impartial jury in New York, where Mr Trump built a business empire, had
been expected to take weeks.

But things moved quickly after Mr Trump's team ran out of the permitted number of
objections.

"We have our jury," Justice Juan Merchan declared on Thursday after seven men and
five women were selected. Two jurors had to be excused earlier.

The trial stems from a hush-money payment to a porn star.

Stormy Daniels was given $130,000 (£105,000) before the 2016 election to buy her
silence about an affair she claims she had with Mr Trump - an affair that Mr Trump
denies having.

The payment itself was not illegal, but Mr Trump has been charged with 34 counts of
falsifying business records brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a
Democrat. He has pleaded not guilty.

As Mr Trump left court on Thursday evening, he showed dozens of printed media

articles criticising the charges, which he said were "political".

"It's a very unfair, very bad thing," said the Republican, who will challenge
President Joe Biden, a Democrat, for the White House in November's election.

"The whole world is watching this hoax." He also took issue with the temperature in
the courtroom, saying it is "freezing in there".

Wildcard witness and untested legal theory: How strong is first Trump case?
What you need to know about Trump's hush-money trial
Who is Juan Merchan, the judge in Trump's case?
The day's jury-selection session faced an initial setback after Justice Merchan
dismissed two members of the panel who had been seated this week.

The judge announced that Juror #2 had realised she could no longer be impartial
after friends and family gleaned from media reports that she had been chosen for
the panel. They began to bombard her with messages, she said.
"I don't believe at this point that I can be fair and unbiased," she said, as it
might be difficult not to let outside opinions affect her decision in the
courtroom.

Justice Merchan swiftly excused her, and subsequently limited the information
reporters could use for descriptions of jurors to make them less identifiable.

"We just lost what probably would've been a very good juror for this case," he
said.

She was not the only one to be dismissed.

Justice Merchan said that after conducting some research, lawyers for the Manhattan
District Attorney's Office discovered that Juror #4 may have lied about having no
criminal history.

The judge said it appeared he had been arrested in the 1990s for tearing down
political advertisements, while his wife may have been involved in a corruption
case investigated by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.

After a long and private discussion with the legal teams and Justice Merchan, this
juror was excused.

Jeremy Saland, a former prosecutor with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office
who now practises criminal defence, told the BBC it is "very uncommon" for jurors
to be seated then dismissed less than 48 hours later.

Anna Cominsky, a professor at the New York Law School, said that the day's dynamics
showed this was no typical criminal case, and the public pressure on those involved
would be unprecedented.

"The real issue here is not keeping the jurors' or potential jurors' identifying
information for the parties," she said. "It's keeping that from the public. That's
the difference."

The hunt for impartial and willing jurors continued in the afternoon. A new batch
of 96 potential jurors was brought into the courtroom.

By the end of the day, seven of them would be sworn in as jurors before the judge.
An additional juror was sworn in as an alternate, and the process of finding five
more standbys will continue on Friday.

Getty Images Stormy Daniels poses during her visit in Cambridge, England, on 12
June 2022Getty Images
Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 for her silence before the 2016 election about an
alleged sexual encounter with Mr Trump
It took a great deal of winnowing to get there.

As was the case in the opening stages of jury selection, Justice Merchan first made
a sweeping dismissal of dozens of jurors, who said they could not judge Mr Trump
impartially.

One prospective juror, who was born and raised in Italy, was excused after he said
he associated Mr Trump with Italy's former Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi.
Mr Trump watched from the sidelines with his arms crossed as his legal team grilled
the panel about whether they had strong feelings about him.

"I disagree with most of his policies," one said.

"I don't like his persona," another prospective juror said.

A third - a Brooklyn native - admitted she also "had opinions" on Mr Trump.

"I spent my whole life knowing about Donald Trump," she said, adding that she once
saw him and his ex-wife Marla Maples shopping for baby items.

But most - including some with "neutral views" on the former president - insisted
that their thoughts on him as a politician would not sway their assessment of him
in court.

The defence team raised concerns about old social media posts from one prospective
juror, in which she called Trump a "racist, sexist, narcissist".

Justice Merchan forced her to read the post aloud to the court. "Oops, that sounds
bad," she said, when coming across the word racist.

"I was in a disturbed frame of mind in that election cycle," she said. "I do not
hold those positions today."

Ultimately, Justice Merchan said it was not worth "taking the chance" with the
juror, and she was dismissed.

Another juror was excused when a surprise personal connection to the case came to
light.

A woman said she met one of Mr Trump's lawyers, Susan Necheles, 15 years ago.

"She stayed at my house overnight," Ms Necheles told the court.

Under questioning, the prospective juror confirmed she stayed there once.

She was dismissed.

Who is Juan Merchan, the judge in Trump's case?

Donald Trump
United States
Related
A simple guide to the US 2024 election
10 hrs ago
US & Canada
What you need to know about Trump's hush-money trial
19 hrs ago
US & Canada
WATCH
Trump complains about 'freezing' courtroom
20 hrs ago
US & Canada
More
3 hrs ago
Ukrainian soldiers fire a mortar
US Congress close to passing long-awaited Ukraine aid
A huge $61bn support package that could help reshape Kyiv's war effort will go to a
vote in coming days.

US & Canada
3 hrs ago
Alex Ye's mugshot
School shooting averted after teen arrested: police
Police say a story the teen wrote depicting a mass shooting was not fictional and
was a violent threat.

US & Canada
4 hrs ago
An illustration of a tank with the Ukrainian flag in the background
Why is Ukraine short of weapons and what is being supplied?
US Congress is poised to decide whether to give Ukraine an extra $61bn in military
aid.

Europe
7 hrs ago
Jill Stein, RFK Jr and Cornel West
Who is running for president in 2024?
Independent and third-party nominees could siphon voters from the Democrats and the
Republicans.

US & Canada
18 hrs ago
Migrants waiting to board bus in Arizona after crossing from Mexico
Extortion and kidnap - a deadly journey across Mexico
Under the radar in the US border crisis debate is the role of drug cartels preying
on migrants.

US & Canada
Home
News
Sport
Business
Innovation
Culture
Travel
Earth
Video
Live
Audio
Weather
BBC Shop
BBC in other languages
Terms of Use
About the BBC
Privacy Policy
Cookies
Accessibility Help
Contact the BBC
Advertise with us
Do not share or sell my info
Contact technical support
Copyright 2024 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the
content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.