REVIEWER CHECKLIST

No :
Article Title :
Delivery Date :
Return Date :
Reviewer’s Name :
Article Type : Original Article

No Questions Yes No
1. Was all or part of the paper has been published to
peer knowledge?
2. Is the research rationale logical?
3. Has the method been described in detail?
4. Is the research valid?
5. Is the analysis gratifying?
6. Is the research well presented?
7. Is the discussion adequate?
8. Are the conclusions supported by the data?
9. Are the references up to date?
10. Is the entire bibliography required?

In the opinion of this paper's peer’s reviewer:

a. Can be published with or without changes
b. Not worth publishing

Comments for authors (use additional paper if necessary)

Editor's note
Paper Category
Reasons for refusal are:
1. Not relevant for JRI
2. Writing format is not good
3. The scientific quality does not meet the standards
4. Similar papers have been published (duplicated)