1

EVOLUTION OF GST AS AN INDIRECT TAX

SCHOOL OF LAW

SUBJECT: (LF )

NAME OF THE TOPIC:

SESSION: 2020-2025

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

DR. APOORVA KHATIYAR GARVITA
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR 200108
MODY UNIVERSITY B.COM LL.B. 4TH YEAR
 2

Contents
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1
1.1. Significance of GST as an Indirect Tax.................................................................................1
 3

1.2. Rationale for Studying the Evolution of GST.......................................................................1

2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND..................................................................................................1
2.2. International Precedents and Models....................................................................................2
2.3 Evolution of GST in Key Countries........................................................................................2
2.4. Milestones in the Development of GST Legislation and Implementation..........................2
3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK...............................................................................................3
3.1. Economic Rationale behind GST Adoption..........................................................................3
3.2. Comparative Analysis of GST vs. Other Indirect Tax Systems..........................................3
3.3. Conceptual Underpinnings of GST........................................................................................4
4. KEY COMPONENTS OF GST....................................................................................................4
4.1. GST Structure: Dual vs. Single Rate, Destination vs. Origin Principle.............................4
4.2. Input Tax Credit Mechanism:................................................................................................5
4.3. Exemptions, Thresholds, and Special Provisions.................................................................5
4.4. Administrative Framework:...................................................................................................5
5. IMPACT ASSESSMENT..............................................................................................................6
5.1. Economic Impact on GDP Growth, Inflation, and Consumption Patterns.......................6
5.2. Effect on Business Operations: Compliance Costs, Supply Chain Efficiency, and
Competitiveness..............................................................................................................................6
5.3. Distributional Effects:.............................................................................................................7
5.4. Revenue Implications for Government:................................................................................7
6. JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS...........................................................................................................8
6.1. Case Study: E-Way Bill System Implementation.................................................................8
6.2. Case Study: Input Tax Credit (ITC) Eligibility...................................................................8
7. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES..................................................................................9
7.1. Challenges in GST Implementation:.....................................................................................9
7.2. Compliance Issues...................................................................................................................9
7.3. Opportunities for Reform:...................................................................................................10
8. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................................10

1. INTRODUCTION
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) stands as one of the most significant reforms in India's indirect
taxation system. Implemented on July 1, 2017, GST replaced a myriad of indirect taxes levied by
both the central and state governments. It aimed to streamline the taxation structure, unify the
Indian market, and create a seamless nationwide tax regime for goods and services.
 4

1.1. Significance of GST as an Indirect Tax

GST represents a shift from the previous complex and fragmented tax structure to a comprehensive
and unified taxation system. It encompasses the taxation of goods and services under a single
umbrella, eliminating cascading effects and promoting efficiency in tax administration. This reform
aimed to boost economic growth, enhance tax compliance, and facilitate ease of doing business in
India.

1.2. Rationale for Studying the Evolution of GST

Understanding the evolution of GST in India is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, it provides
insights into the challenges and opportunities encountered during the transition from the previous
tax regime to GST. Secondly, analyzing the evolution sheds light on the policy decisions, legislative
amendments, and administrative changes undertaken to make GST more effective and taxpayer-
friendly. Additionally, studying the evolution of GST offers lessons for other countries considering
similar tax reforms, contributing to the global discourse on indirect taxation.

2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
s2.1. Origins of GST Concept: Early Proposals and Debates
The concept of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) has its origins in the 1950s and 1960s when
economists and policymakers began advocating for a comprehensive tax system that would tax both
goods and services at each stage of production and distribution. The idea gained traction globally as
countries sought ways to simplify their tax systems and remove inefficiencies associated with
cascading taxes.
In India, the idea of GST was first proposed in 1986 by the then Finance Minister, Vishwanath
Pratap Singh. However, it took several years of debate and discussion before concrete steps were
taken towards its implementation.

2.2. International Precedents and Models

Several countries around the world have implemented GST or similar value-added tax (VAT)
systems. These include:
2.1.1. Canada: Canada implemented the Goods and Services Tax in 1991, replacing a federal
manufacturer's sales tax. Subsequently, many provinces also adopted a harmonized sales tax (HST)
combining the federal GST with provincial sales taxes.
2.2.2. Australia: Australia introduced the Goods and Services Tax in 2000, replacing various
federal and state taxes. The Australian GST is a broad-based tax on most goods and services
consumed in the country.
 5

2.2.3. New Zealand: New Zealand implemented GST in 1986, replacing a range of sales taxes. The
New Zealand GST is one of the broadest-based consumption taxes globally, covering almost all
goods and services.
2.3 Evolution of GST in Key Countries
In India, the journey towards GST implementation was marked by extensive deliberations, debates,
and negotiations between the central and state governments. The GST Council, comprising
representatives from the central and state governments, played a crucial role in finalizing the GST
framework, including tax rates, exemptions, and administrative procedures.
2.4. Milestones in the Development of GST Legislation and Implementation
In India, the evolution of GST legislation can be outlined through the following milestones:
• Constitutional Amendment: The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016, introduced the
necessary amendments to enable the levy of GST by both the central and state governments.
• Enactment of CGST and SGST Acts: The Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act and
State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) Acts were passed by the Parliament and state legislatures,
respectively, to provide a legal framework for GST implementation.
• Formation of GST Council: The GST Council was constituted to make recommendations on
various aspects of GST, including tax rates, exemptions, and threshold limits. The Council met
regularly to iron out differences between the center and states and ensure a smooth transition to
GST.
• GST Rollout: GST was officially rolled out on July 1, 2017, replacing a plethora of central and
state taxes such as Central Excise Duty, Service Tax, VAT, and others.
• Subsequent Reforms and Amendments: Since its implementation, GST in India has undergone
several reforms and amendments, including changes in tax rates, simplification of compliance
procedures, and addressing issues raised by taxpayers and industry stakeholders.

Overall, the evolution of GST in India and other countries reflects a global trend towards
simplifying and rationalizing indirect tax systems to promote economic growth, improve tax
compliance, and enhance the ease of doing business.

3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3.1. Economic Rationale behind GST Adoption
The adoption of Goods and Services Tax (GST) is rooted in several economic principles that aim to
enhance the efficiency and equity of the tax system:
 6

3.1.1. Efficiency: GST eliminates the cascading effect of taxes by allowing input tax credit across
the supply chain. This ensures that taxes are levied only on the value addition at each stage of
production and distribution, leading to a more efficient allocation of resources and reducing market
distortions. By minimizing tax distortions, GST promotes productivity, investment, and economic
growth.
3.1.2. Equity: GST promotes horizontal and vertical equity by taxing consumption rather than
income. Unlike income taxes, which may disproportionately burden certain income groups, GST
ensures that individuals contribute to the tax system based on their consumption patterns. Moreover,
GST can be designed with progressive or regressive elements to ensure that the tax burden is
distributed fairly across different income levels.
3.1.3. Simplicity: GST simplifies the tax compliance burden for businesses by replacing multiple
indirect taxes with a single tax regime. This simplification reduces administrative costs, compliance
errors, and tax evasion, thereby improving overall tax administration efficiency. Additionally, a
simplified tax system fosters a conducive environment for business expansion, investment, and
entrepreneurship.
3.1.4. Revenue Neutrality: One of the key objectives of GST implementation is to achieve revenue
neutrality, meaning that the introduction of GST should not significantly alter the overall tax
revenue collection. This is achieved by setting appropriate tax rates and designing the GST
framework to ensure that the tax burden remains broadly consistent with the pre-GST tax regime.
Revenue neutrality helps maintain fiscal stability and ensures that the transition to GST does not
disrupt government finances.

3.2. Comparative Analysis of GST vs. Other Indirect Tax Systems

A comparative analysis of GST against other indirect tax systems, such as sales tax, value-added tax
(VAT), and excise duties, reveals several advantages of GST:
3.2.1. Uniformity: Unlike the fragmented nature of sales tax systems, GST provides a uniform tax
structure across states and regions, promoting national market integration and simplifying interstate
trade.
3.2.2. Cascade Mitigation: Unlike sales taxes, which are levied on the entire value of goods at each
stage of production, GST allows for the offset of tax paid on inputs, thereby eliminating the
cascading effect and reducing the tax burden on final consumers.
3.2.3. Comprehensive Coverage: GST typically covers a broader base of goods and services
compared to traditional sales taxes, resulting in higher revenue generation potential and a more
equitable distribution of the tax burden.
 7

3.2.4. Input Tax Credit: GST allows businesses to claim input tax credit on taxes paid on inputs,
capital goods, and services used in the production process, leading to greater tax efficiency, cost
savings, and enhanced competitiveness.

3.3. Conceptual Underpinnings of GST: Efficiency, Equity, Simplicity, and Revenue Neutrality
Efficiency, equity, simplicity, and revenue neutrality serve as the conceptual underpinnings of GST
design and implementation:
3.3.1. Efficiency: GST aims to minimize economic distortions and promote resource allocation
efficiency by taxing consumption at each stage of production based on value addition.
3.3.2. Equity: GST seeks to distribute the tax burden fairly across individuals and businesses based
on their consumption patterns, ensuring horizontal and vertical equity in taxation.
3.3.3. Simplicity: GST simplifies tax compliance and administration by replacing multiple indirect
taxes with a single, comprehensive tax regime, reducing compliance costs and administrative
complexities.
3.3.4. Revenue Neutrality: GST implementation strives to maintain overall tax revenue levels
consistent with the pre-GST regime, ensuring fiscal stability and continuity in government finances.

Overall, the theoretical framework of GST underscores its role in fostering economic efficiency,
equity, simplicity, and revenue stability, thereby contributing to sustainable economic development
and improved welfare outcomes.

4. KEY COMPONENTS OF GST

4.1. GST Structure: Dual vs. Single Rate, Destination vs. Origin Principle
a. Dual vs. Single Rate: GST systems can have either a dual-rate structure, where different goods
and services are taxed at different rates, or a single-rate structure, where a uniform rate is applied to
all goods and services. The choice between dual and single rates depends on various factors such as
revenue considerations, equity concerns, and administrative feasibility.
b. Destination vs. Origin Principle: In a destination-based GST system, taxes are levied based
on the consumption destination, regardless of where the goods or services are produced. This
principle ensures that taxes are collected in the jurisdiction where consumption occurs, promoting
market integration and reducing tax competition among regions. Conversely, an origin-based GST
system taxes goods and services based on their production location, which may lead to complexities
in tax administration and compliance, especially in the context of interstate trade.
 8

4.2. Input Tax Credit Mechanism: Principles and Implementation Challenges

a. Principles: The input tax credit mechanism allows businesses to claim credit for the GST paid
on inputs, capital goods, and services used in the production process. This mechanism ensures that
taxes paid at earlier stages of the supply chain are not embedded in the final price of goods and
services, thereby avoiding the cascading effect of taxes and promoting tax efficiency.
b. Implementation Challenges: Implementing an effective input tax credit mechanism requires
robust IT infrastructure, seamless integration of tax systems, and stringent compliance mechanisms.
Challenges may arise due to mismatches in input-output tax rates, fraudulent claims, and
complexities in verifying input tax credit eligibility, especially in sectors with complex supply
chains.

4.3. Exemptions, Thresholds, and Special Provisions

a. Exemptions: GST regimes typically provide exemptions for certain goods and services deemed
essential for social welfare or economic development. Exempted items may include basic food
items, healthcare services, and education.
b. Thresholds: GST regimes often set thresholds below which small businesses are exempted
from GST registration and compliance requirements. Thresholds aim to reduce the compliance
burden on small businesses and promote ease of doing business.
c. Special Provisions: GST laws may include special provisions for specific sectors or
transactions to address unique challenges or policy objectives. For example, special provisions may
be introduced for the real estate sector, financial services, or cross-border transactions.

4.4. Administrative Framework: Tax Collection, Enforcement, and Compliance Mechanisms

a. Tax Collection: Under GST, tax collection is shared between the central and state governments
based on the respective taxing jurisdictions. Tax authorities collect GST through online portals,
facilitating electronic filing and payment of taxes.
b. Enforcement: GST enforcement involves monitoring compliance with GST laws, detecting tax
evasion, and taking enforcement actions against non-compliant taxpayers. Tax authorities conduct
audits, inspections, and investigations to ensure adherence to GST regulations.
c. Compliance Mechanisms: GST regimes implement various compliance mechanisms such as
tax returns, invoices, electronic records, and reconciliation statements to ensure accurate reporting
and payment of taxes by taxpayers. Non-compliance may result in penalties, fines, or legal action
by tax authorities.
 9

Overall, the key components of GST encompass its structure, input tax credit mechanism,
exemptions, thresholds, and administrative framework, all aimed at creating a robust and efficient
indirect tax system that promotes economic growth, equity, and compliance.

5. IMPACT ASSESSMENT
5.1. Economic Impact on GDP Growth, Inflation, and Consumption Patterns
a. GDP Growth: GST is expected to have a positive impact on GDP growth by promoting
efficiency in tax administration, reducing tax distortions, and fostering a unified national market. By
streamlining the tax structure and eliminating barriers to interstate trade, GST facilitates smoother
movement of goods and services, encourages investment, and enhances productivity, ultimately
contributing to economic growth.
b. Inflation: In the short term, GST implementation may lead to inflationary pressures due to
changes in tax rates and compliance costs. However, over the long term, GST is expected to
mitigate inflation by reducing tax cascading, improving supply chain efficiency, and promoting
competition, which can lead to lower prices for consumers.
c. Consumption Patterns: GST may influence consumption patterns by altering the relative
prices of goods and services. For example, changes in tax rates may affect the affordability and
demand for certain products. Additionally, GST's impact on income distribution and consumer
behavior could influence spending patterns across different sectors of the economy.

5.2. Effect on Business Operations: Compliance Costs, Supply Chain Efficiency, and
Competitiveness
a. Compliance Costs: GST implementation initially entails compliance costs for businesses,
including system upgrades, training, and administrative expenses associated with tax filing and
record-keeping. However, over time, GST simplifies compliance procedures, reduces paperwork,
and enhances transparency, leading to potential cost savings for businesses.
b. Supply Chain Efficiency: GST promotes supply chain efficiency by eliminating tax cascading
and providing input tax credits, which incentivize businesses to optimize their production and
distribution processes. By reducing transaction costs and administrative complexities, GST
facilitates smoother movement of goods and services along the supply chain, enhancing overall
efficiency and competitiveness.
c. Competitiveness: GST can improve the competitiveness of domestic businesses by eliminating
interstate trade barriers, harmonizing tax rates, and reducing compliance burdens. A level playing
field created by GST fosters fair competition among businesses, encourages investment, and
enhances India's attractiveness as a destination for both domestic and foreign investment.
 10

5.3. Distributional Effects: Impact on Different Income Groups and Sectors

a. GST's impact on different income groups varies depending on their consumption patterns and
ability to absorb tax changes. While GST aims to maintain equity in taxation, certain goods and
services may become relatively more expensive, affecting low-income households
disproportionately. Government policies such as exemptions and targeted assistance programs may
mitigate adverse distributional effects.

b. GST's sectoral impact varies across industries, with some sectors benefiting from input tax
credits and simplified compliance, while others may face challenges due to changes in tax rates or
demand patterns. For instance, service-oriented sectors may experience increased competitiveness
and growth opportunities under GST, while sectors with high compliance costs or reliance on
unorganized segments may face transitional challenges.

5.4. Revenue Implications for Government: Analysis of Tax Buoyancy and Fiscal Sustainability
a. GST's revenue implications for the government depend on factors such as tax rates, compliance
levels, economic growth, and consumption patterns. Tax buoyancy, or the responsiveness of tax
revenue to changes in GDP, reflects GST's revenue generation capacity and its sensitivity to
economic fluctuations.

b. Fiscal sustainability under GST is contingent on maintaining a balance between revenue

generation and expenditure priorities. While GST aims to broaden the tax base and enhance revenue
efficiency, policymakers must ensure that tax policies are conducive to economic growth,
employment generation, and social welfare objectives without compromising fiscal stability.

c. Effective tax administration, monitoring of compliance, and periodic review of tax policies are
essential for ensuring revenue adequacy and fiscal sustainability under GST. Transparent fiscal
reporting, prudent fiscal management, and proactive measures to address revenue shortfalls or
expenditure pressures contribute to the long-term viability of the GST regime.

In conclusion, assessing the economic, operational, distributional, and revenue implications of GST
provides valuable insights into its effectiveness as an indirect tax reform measure and its broader
impact on India's economy and society.
 11

6. JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS
6.1. Case Study: E-Way Bill System Implementation
The E-Way Bill System is an electronic documentation mechanism introduced under GST for the
movement of goods worth over a certain threshold. A notable case study regarding its
implementation is the Gujarat High Court case of AAP And Co. v. State of Gujarat:
In this case, the petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of certain provisions related to the
E-Way Bill System under GST. The High Court examined the legality and practical implications of
the E-Way Bill System, including issues related to compliance burden, technological infrastructure,
and administrative efficiency.

The judgment provided insights into the challenges faced by businesses in complying with the E-
Way Bill System and underscored the importance of addressing implementation issues to ensure
smooth interstate trade under GST.

6.2. Case Study: Input Tax Credit (ITC) Eligibility

Input Tax Credit (ITC) is a key feature of GST that allows businesses to claim credit for the GST
paid on inputs used in the production process. A significant case study in this regard is the
Telangana High Court case of Megha Engineering & Infra Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central
Tax & Ors.:
In this case, the petitioner contested the denial of ITC on certain inputs used in the construction of
infrastructure projects. The High Court examined the legal provisions governing ITC eligibility
under GST and the interpretation of relevant laws and notifications by the tax authorities.
The judgment highlighted the importance of clarity and consistency in determining ITC eligibility
criteria and emphasized the need for transparent guidelines to avoid disputes between taxpayers and
tax authorities.

These case studies illustrate the practical challenges and legal complexities associated with the
implementation and interpretation of GST laws in India. They also underscore the role of judicial
intervention in clarifying legal ambiguities, protecting taxpayer rights, and ensuring the effective
functioning of the GST regime.

7. CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

7.1. Challenges in GST Implementation: Technological, Administrative, and Political Hurdles
a. Technological Challenges: The successful implementation of GST relies heavily on robust
technological infrastructure, including GSTN (Goods and Services Tax Network) for tax filing,
invoice matching, and compliance verification. However, technical glitches, system failures, and
 12

capacity constraints in GSTN have posed significant challenges, leading to delays and disruptions in
tax compliance processes.
b. Administrative Hurdles: The administrative complexity of GST, with its dual structure
involving both central and state governments, presents challenges in coordination, harmonization,
and dispute resolution. Administrative bottlenecks, such as delayed refunds, cumbersome
compliance procedures, and frequent changes in tax rules, have contributed to compliance burdens
for businesses and administrative inefficiencies.
c. Political Considerations: GST implementation involves navigating complex political
dynamics, including inter-state disagreements, resistance from certain sectors or states, and
conflicting interests among stakeholders. Political hurdles, such as opposition to tax rate changes or
reluctance to cede fiscal autonomy to the GST Council, have hampered the smooth rollout and
effective functioning of GST.

7.2. Compliance Issues: Tax Evasion, Fraud, and Administrative Bottlenecks

a. Tax Evasion: GST's self-assessment mechanism relies on voluntary compliance by taxpayers,
making it susceptible to tax evasion, underreporting, and non-compliance. Complex tax structures,
inadequate enforcement mechanisms, and loopholes in the tax law contribute to tax evasion,
depriving the government of revenue and distorting market competition.
b. Fraudulent Practices: GST has witnessed instances of fraudulent practices such as fake
invoices, input tax credit fraud, and circular trading, leading to revenue leakages and undermining
the integrity of the tax system. The proliferation of fraudulent activities highlights the need for
robust anti-evasion measures, enhanced audit capabilities, and stringent penalties for non-compliant
behavior.
c. Administrative Bottlenecks: Administrative bottlenecks, including delays in tax refunds,
cumbersome compliance procedures, and inconsistent application of tax laws by tax authorities,
create disincentives for voluntary compliance and erode taxpayer trust in the tax administration.
Streamlining administrative processes, improving taxpayer services, and enhancing transparency
can address compliance challenges and promote tax compliance.

7.3. Opportunities for Reform: Policy Recommendations and Best Practices from International
Experiences
a. Simplified Tax Structure: Simplifying the GST tax structure by reducing the number of tax
rates and exemptions can enhance tax compliance, reduce administrative burdens, and promote ease
of doing business. Drawing from international best practices, India can streamline its tax structure
to achieve greater efficiency and simplicity.
 13

b. Enhanced Technology Infrastructure: Investing in robust technology infrastructure, including

GSTN upgrades, digital compliance tools, and data analytics capabilities, can improve tax
administration efficiency, enhance compliance monitoring, and mitigate tax evasion risks.
c. Strengthening Enforcement Mechanisms: Strengthening enforcement mechanisms through
enhanced audit capabilities, risk-based compliance checks, and coordinated efforts between central
and state tax authorities can deter tax evasion, detect fraudulent activities, and ensure greater tax
compliance.
d. Capacity Building and Training: Investing in capacity building and training programs for tax
officials, businesses, and professionals can enhance GST awareness, improve compliance levels,
and foster a culture of tax compliance and integrity.
e. International Collaboration: Collaborating with international tax authorities and adopting best
practices from countries with successful GST implementations can provide valuable insights and
benchmarks for reforming India's GST regime, addressing compliance challenges, and maximizing
revenue potential.

In conclusion, addressing the challenges and leveraging opportunities in GST implementation

requires concerted efforts from policymakers, tax authorities, businesses, and other stakeholders. By
adopting a comprehensive reform agenda focused on simplification, technology enhancement,
enforcement strengthening, and capacity building, India can realize the full potential of GST as a
transformative tax reform measure conducive to sustainable economic growth and development.

8. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) stands as a monumental reform in India's indirect
taxation system, aiming to streamline tax administration, promote economic efficiency, and foster
market integration. Despite facing initial challenges in implementation, including technological,
administrative, and political hurdles, GST has demonstrated its potential to enhance tax compliance,
simplify business operations, and contribute to economic growth. Moving forward, a robust
research agenda encompassing impact assessment, sectoral studies, compliance analysis,
technological innovation, policy reforms, and stakeholder engagement is essential to optimize the
benefits of GST and address ongoing challenges. By leveraging evidence-based research,
international best practices, and stakeholder collaboration, India can further refine its GST regime
to realize its full potential as a catalyst for sustainable development, inclusive growth, and social
welfare in the years to come.