Final Project

By Christina Daccache

ID:202101364

Soc 217 CRN 10455

Civic Engagement

DR. Lina Bitar

 PROBLEM TREE

Although the Lebanese law prohibits child labour, however, it is not enforced.
EFFECT THERE IS NO RESPECT TO CHILDREN’S RIGHTS IN LEBANON.
PROBLEM Children who are less than 16 years old in CAZA X are forced into labour.
PRIMARY CAUSE Families in CAZA X are deprived of basic needs.
SECONDARY CAUSES
1. Families in CAZA X have limited access to food.
2. There is an absence of law enforcement related to child labour in Lebanon.

OBJECTIVE TREE:

IMPACT: Greater Respect in Lebanon for the Rights of Children.

PURPOSE: To abolish child labour in CAZA X and guarantee that child labour laws are upheld
in Lebanon.

RESULTS: Children under the age of sixteen are no longer coerced into labour, and families in
CAZA X enjoy better living conditions.

OUTPUTS:
greater family access to necessities in CAZA X
enhanced compliance with Lebanon's regulations against child labour

Let's now dissect the Outcome into more focused goals:

The outcome is:

Children under the age of sixteen are no longer coerced into labour, and families in CAZA X
enjoy better living conditions.

GOALS:
a. To improve families' access to basic necessities in CAZA X:

Expand the food resources available to CAZA X families.

Offer basic needs support programmes to families in CAZA X.

b. Stricter Enforcement of Lebanon's Child Labour Laws:

Push for harsher sanctions for those who violate the country's child labour laws.

Educate and raise public and law enforcement authorities' knowledge of child labour regulations.

Enhance the systems for reporting and monitoring incidents of child labour.

FLOWER POWER

1) At the GRASSROOT level:

Children in CAZA X who are compelled to work as forced labourers are the direct
beneficiaries.
Families in CAZA X who are currently without basic necessities are considered indirect
beneficiaries.

2) Centre of POWER:

In this case, the government agencies in charge of upholding Lebanon's laws against child
labour may be the centre of power. The Ministry of Labour or other pertinent agencies
may be one example of this.

3) INFLUENCERS:

Community Leaders:
Local CAZA X leaders have the power to shape beliefs and behaviours in the community.

Educational Institutions:
Teachers and schools have a part to play in educating the public and averting child labour.

Religious Leaders:
Prominent individuals in religious groups who possess the ability to speak out against
child labour.

4) ADVOCACY PEOPLE AND/OR GROUPS:

Human rights organisations are regional and global groups that support children's rights
and oppose child labour.

Legal advocates are professionals in the legal field who can work to improve the way
child labour laws are enforced.

NGOs tackling the core cause of poverty by attempting to provide the fundamental needs
of families in CAZA X are known as Poverty Alleviation Organisations.
 Stakeholders Analysis Template

Stakeholder Degree of Influence Over

Agreement Project
Government Authorities Neutral High
(Lebanese)
Community Leaders (CAZA X) Agree Medium
Families in CAZA X Agree Low
Children in CAZA X Strongly Agree Low
Human Rights Organizations Strongly Agree Medium
Educational Institutions Neutral Medium
Religious Leaders Agree Low
Legal Advocates Strongly Agree Medium
NGOs working on Poverty Agree Medium
Alleviation

Further Explanation:

Lebanese government authorities:

Rationale: Law enforcement is within the purview of the government. Even if they might
support the idea, they have a lot of power when it comes to enforcing laws and policies.

CAZA X Community Leaders:

Rationale: Local leaders have sway in the community. Their influence is moderate, but
their agreement is crucial for community support.

CAZA X families:

Rationale: Despite their potential support for the initiative, the families' current
precarious situation may limit their ability to exert influence.

Children in CAZA X:

Justification: Although they are the immediate beneficiaries and are probably in full
agreement, their influence may be constrained by their age and the ways of society.

Human Rights Organisations:

Justification: These groups have a strong consensus and a modicum of influence,

especially through their national and worldwide advocacy and awareness-raising efforts.

Reasons for Educational Institutions:

 Even though they might take a neutral position, educational establishments can impact
school-based awareness and prevention initiatives.

Religious Authorities:
Justification: Religious leaders may not have as much direct influence as other
stakeholders, but their agreement is still vital for community support.

Advocates for Law:

Justification: firmly in agreement, legal advocates have the power to ensure efficient law
enforcement and to change policies.

NGOs that strive to reduce poverty:

Justification: Yes, these companies are able to deal with the underlying issues, their
influence is moderate through poverty alleviation programs.

Risk Analysis Template

Risk
Likelihood Impact Level (L
Risk (L) (I) x I) Explanation Mitigation Action(s)
Engage with legal advocates,
NGOs, and human rights
1. Non- organizations to advocate for
compliance Lebanese authorities better enforcement. Ensure
with Child may not enforce laws continuous monitoring and
Labor Laws High High High adequately. reporting.
Conduct awareness campaigns,
Community leaders involve community leaders in
2. Lack of and families may not project planning, and address
Community fully support the concerns through open
Support Medium Medium Medium project. communication and dialogue.
Diversify funding sources, seek
grants, and establish
Inadequate financial partnerships with NGOs and
resources may hinder international organizations.
3. Insufficient project Develop a detailed budget and
Funding High High High implementation. financial contingency plan.
Work closely with law
enforcement to ensure penalties
4. Resistance Employers exploiting for non-compliance. Implement
from child labor may resist a robust reporting mechanism
Employers Medium High High change. for anonymous tips.
Collaborate with local NGOs,
community leaders, and schools
5. Limited to identify and connect with
Access to Difficulty reaching families. Utilize community
Families Medium Medium Medium families in need. networks for outreach.
 Risk
Likelihood Impact Level (L
Risk (L) (I) x I) Explanation Mitigation Action(s)
Implement a comprehensive
communication strategy
6. Negative Negative public emphasizing the positive impact
Public Low to opinion affecting of the project. Engage with
Perception Low Medium Medium project reputation. media for positive coverage.
Stay informed about policy
changes, maintain strong
advocacy efforts, and build
7. Policy Changes in relationships with
Changes in Low to government policies policymakers. Be adaptable and
Lebanon Low High Medium affecting the project. ready to adjust strategies.

Definition:
Likelihood (L):
The likelihood that the risk will materialise (Low, Medium, High).
Impact (I):
The degree of repercussions (Low, Medium, High) in the event that the risk materialises.
Risk Level (L x I):
Determined by multiplying impact by likelihood.
Just a succinct explanation of the danger.
Action(s) for Mitigation:
Methods to reduce or eliminate the risk.