Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There is a clear historical bias in the media towards men’s sports, which has resulted in unequal representation of women’s sports
programs on television. This perpetuates the notion that men’s sports are more popular and profitable, leading to a lack of
visibility for female athletes. Take football as an example. When entering a coffee shop, it is easy to catch groups of men having
discussions about a recent men’s football match, while women show greater preference for shopping or lifestyle channels.
Besides, because men usually perform better than women in physical sports such as boxing and bodybuilding, they play at a much
higher level, which makes men’s sports more exciting to watch.
On the other hand, I believe it is necessary for TV channels to provide equal coverage for both genders. First, it can create gender
equality in society and increase the rate of women’s sports participation. In fact, every time women go out on the field, they give it
their all knowing that their best will likely go unnoticed. Therefore, just like men. Female athletes should receive full recognition
for their effort. Secondly, better TV coverage also enables women to make money off from endorsements and enhance their living
standard. More TV exposure for the female players will lead to major deals with endorsers and higher salaries in the future
through advertising contracts.
In conclusion, why women’s sports programs do not receive coverage as much as men’s sports results from those aforementioned
reasons, and I truly believe that it is necessary to ensure coverage of women’s sports.
2. Some people think that hosting international sporting events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad.
Discuss both views and state your opinion.
In recent years, the question of whether celebrating transnational sporting events is beneficial or harmful is still a matter of debate.
In my opinion, such significant events are more likely to bring merit and should not be dismissed as bad.
To begin with, although events such as these are a great opportunity for countries to gain global exposure, there are present
significant challenges. Firstly, records have shown that there is a twofold increase in crimes such as prostitution and petty theft
when a country organizes an event such as the World Cup or the Olympics. Furthermore, the process of preparing for these events
is often demanding. For the World Cup 2014, it took Brazil five years to revitalize its cities and construct various facilities
including stadiums and indoor athletics arenas to meet the world-class standard set by FIFA.
On the other hand, I think organizing international sporting events can foster the economy effectively. This influx of tourism,
sponsorships, and investments can stimulate various sectors such as hospitality, transportation, and retail. By being the host, a
country can attract a large array of athletes and their supporters from all around the world. This sudden increase in visitors will
likely proliferate the sales of products and services such as accommodation and transportation within the period of the events.
Moreover, I believe that it is a great chance for the host nations to promote their culture on a global stage. For example, since the
pictures of beautifully garnished Vietnamese dishes made headlines during the SEA Games in 203, Vietnam has been branded as
the “Kitchen of the World” and a must visit destination for global food lovers. This obviously does wonders for the Vietnamese
economy.
In conclusion, although sports events come at the expense of a few immediate problems, the benefits of boosted gross sales and
cultural promotion are of greater significance. In my opinion, host nations can also consider the option of sharing an event with a
neighboring country to spread the risk and still enjoy the lucrative long-term benefits.