NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 1 of 23, won wr eDF ENERGY EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd Company Technical Standard for Controlling the Quality of Non Destructive Testing Originated By: Philip Heath Date: January 2019 NDT Inspection Engineer nominated by Fleet Lead Approved By: Darren Chapman Date: January 2019 Non Destructive Testing Fleet Lead on behalf of the Working Group Approved By: John Hart Date: January 2019 Chief Mechanical Engineer Approved By: Ajaz Khan Date: January 2019 Chief Engineer Editorial Clive Ryall Date: June 2023 Amendment, Lead ‘agreed By rocess Lea REVISION ‘AMENDMENT IMPACT LEVEL | DATE Editorial amendment to update references 003 | BEG/ICP/DM/006 and BEG/SPEC/QUA/020 which Editorial June 2023 have been superseded. ‘Amendment (© 2023 Publishes in tho Une Kingdom by EOF Energy Nucla ration Lia ‘All rights reserved, No part otis publcaton may be produced or ransmittedin any form aby any means, inlusng photocopying and rearing ‘wthout ts writen permission of be copyight Nader, EOF Energy Nuclear Generation Lt, appleaion fr whlen shoul be aaarescea tothe pulse. ‘Sve witen permission must ls be ablaned before ary arto th publestion sored in a retieval stem a any nae. Requests or copes 6 coment shouldbe reterrd to Bamuroed Document Conte, Location *2, EOF Energy Nuclar Generation i. Bart Way. Bamwoos, Glucose (GLe 3RS (Te ovasz-s6270%). The elecvonc copy is the current seve ana pontng enaers is document unesntoled. Cantoled copy Alger wil font receve updates at uta LIMITATION OF LIABILITY — whist EDF Energy Nucler Generation Lid belves th publication does nol quarante thal Ps so, Esto the sutaoly of te eration forthe theret. EDF Energy Nuclear Goneraton Las trom any use town the informaton is pu the nformation glven this documents correct atthe date of tha he formation i sufable for ary parca purgose. Users must hrefore say thernselvos 2 fo" wic® they reqs and must mate all cnece hey deem necessary to very tre accuracy na be abl for ay oss damage (excent or dea a personal Fry caused by eglgence) sri Parent Doc: BEGNICP/ENG/SH/001 ‘Template Ref: BEG/FORM/QUA/030 Rev 011 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENG/CTSI210 Revision 003 Page 2 of 23, VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE Document Title: Controlling the Quality of Non Destructive Testing Station: | Generic Document Reference: | BEGISPEC/ENG/CTSI210 Revision: | 002 Task File Number: | E/TSK/GEN/13291 Folder 69 QA Grade of document: | 2 ‘Author: | Philip Heath Section/Group: | Inspection Group Vertifier(s): | Non Destructive Testing Working Group Principal Verifier: | Steve Meikle Section/Group: | Inspection Group Verification Statement: Verified in accordance with BEG/SPEC/DAQ/010 in terms of + All comments received from the CTS 210 Working Group have been appropriately addressed. = Other changes are consistent with current best practice and procedures. + Typographical accuracy. ‘Approved by: Non Destructive Testing Fleet Lead Darren Chapman NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENG/CTSI210 Revision 003 Page 3 of 23, CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE 4 1.1 Mandatory Requirements Justification 4 2 SCOPE 4 2.1 System / Component Description Summary 4 22 EPRICodes 5 2.3 Document Hierarchy 5 2.4 Ageing Management and Plant Lifetime Extension (PLEX) 5 25 Requirements Derivation 5 2.6 Requirements Compliance 5 3 RESPONSIBILITIES 5 3.1. Head of Design Authority (or delegate) 5 3.2 Technical Governance Process Owner / The Chief Engineer 6 3.3. Discipline Chiefs (or equivalent) 6 3.4 Fleet Lead Non Destructive Testing 6 3.5 Station Director 6 3.6 Station Engineering Manager (or delegate) 6 4 PRACTICE 6 41 Controls to be applied to NDT activities 7 42 Implementation of NDT Controls 9 43° Compliance / Non-compliance 10 5 DEFINITIONS " 6 REFERENCES 12 7 RECORDS 12 7.1 Compliance and Dispensation Records 2 TABLES 3 APPENDIXA: CTS 210 APPLICATION FLOW CHART 16 APPENDIXB: DOCUMENT WORKING GROUP MEMBERS 7 APPENDIXC: TECHNICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TEMPLATE 8 APPENDIXD: COMPANY TECHNICAL STANDARD DOCUMENT SPECIFICATION 20 APPENDIXE: EXTERNAL DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS SUPPORTED BY THIS CTS 22 DISTRIBUTION LIST 23 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 44 144 2 24 Revision 003 Page 4 of 23, PURPOSE ‘The purpose of this Company Technical Standard (CTS) is to provide Power Stations and Central Technical Organisation (CTO) with the mandatory requirements for controlling the quality of Non Destructive Testing (NDT). ‘The document originates from the CEGB Production, Inspection and Testing Board (1980s) and has been in use in its various revisions as a mandatory control/compliance since then. This CTS is supported by an implementation document, BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/038 (Reference 9), which also has CEGB origins. ‘These requirements are deemed mandatory in order to meet objectives for safe and reliable operation as set out in the EDF Energy Integrated Company Practice for Technical Governance (Reference 1). Mandatory Requirements Justification Nuclear and Environmental Safety Significance ‘The requirements contained in this document are mandatory for all plant associated with EDF Energy Power Stations and contribute to the safe management of nuclear safely related plant or plant that may interact with nuclear significant plant / structures should they degrade andior fall Legislation compliance Statutory Instruments identify when NDT is required to be undertaken to ensure compliance with the relevant statutory and regulatory requirements. NDT is an important nuclear and personnel safety consideration throughout a component life cycle. Management of this process will provide a significant contribution towards achieving and maintaining statutory and corporate compliance with Safety, Health and Environmental policies and associated legislation during all phases of the components life cycle. License Condition / Regulator requirement + LC17- Quality Assurance. + LC28 - Examination, inspection, maintenance and testing + LC29- Duty to carry out tests, inspections and examinations. Mitigation for Significant Commercial / Lifetime Risk ‘The mandatory requirements of this document work towards safe, reliable operation of EDF plant and equipment. The document's aim is for NDT inspection to be carried out effectively, ensuring the correct quality for new / replacement plant and equipment is adhered to and to mitigate for degradation of plant and equipment which may result in potentially significant industrial / nuclear safety issues that can lead to significant commercial loss. SCOPE ‘System / Component Description Summary This CTS applies to the following NDT methods including specialist applications: ultrasonic testing, radiographic testing, magnetic particle inspection, penetrant inspection, eddy current inspection, and visual inspection. ‘The control mechanisms described in this CTS shall be implemented for NDT carried out by EDF Energy staff and shall be invoked in all contracts or purchase orders involving NDT services or NDT. as part of a process of manufacture, maintenance or repair of EDF Energy plant. The reasons for this are: (2) NDT very often forms the last verification step in a process or series of processes. NDT provides a check on other processes (such as welding); there is no check for NDT other than to repeat it, which is clearly uneconomical; NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 22 23 24 25 26 34 Revision 003 Page § of 23, (b) NDT relies heavily on the personal skills and integrity of the operators carrying it out and fn their actions and thought processes at the time of the test. It is impossible, in the majority of cases, to verify what has been done, other than to repeat i. Because 100% direct verification of NDT is either not possible or not cost-effective, its quality must be assured by ensuring that itis carried out within an adequate quality management system. This is done by relying to the greatest extent possible on nationally available third-party means of assuring supplier quality (for example by certification to a recognised quality standard). The third party systems available for evaluation of NDT suppliers do not cover site activities adequately therefore additional requirements are specified by EDF Energy. EPRI Codes Not Applicable. Document Hierarchy This document forms part of the Technical Governance document suite which sets out a fleet wide approach to standardisation of mandatory requirements for plant operation, maintenance and modification. The Technical Governance Integrated Company Practice (ICP) (Reference 1) sets out the full scope of this activity and the associated document hierarchy. This CTS is linked to the Procurement Specification (PSPEC) BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/O38 — Controlling the Quality of Non-Destructive Testing: Implementation of CTS 210 (Reference 9) ‘Ageing Management and Plant Lifetime Extension (PLEX) Compliance with this CTS will assist in the identification of any environmental stresses or ageing factor effects that may reach such a level that will potentially result in the degradation of components of a plant system on station and allow remedial measures, maintenance and inspection plans to be established before this level of degradation occurs. Requirements Derivation Mandatory _ requirements have been derived from previous documentation BEG/SPEC/ENG/BEOM/210. Requirements Compliance Mandatory requirements in this CTS are numerically identified and written in bold text ‘The “Company Specification for Technical Governance Documentation Implementation and Compliance” (Reference 2) outlines how all CTSs must be complied with across the fleet. RESPONSIBILITIES The responsibilities specific to this document are listed below. Refer to the Document Production and Approval Specification (Reference 3), Implementation & Compliance Specification (Reference 2) and ICP (Reference 1) for wider Technical Governance (TG) process responsibilities. Head of Design Authority (or delegate) ‘The Head of Design Authority (DA) is responsible for championing the ICP_and ensuring that adequate organisational arrangements are in place within Fleet Engineering Standards (FES) to support the delivery of the Part ICPs and their supporting documentation. The Head of DA also has responsibility for approving all new TG Company Technical Standard documents, and revisions that have an impact level of Moderate or Major. This is to ensure that the document does not contradict, conflict with, or undermine any existing nuclear Safety Cases or generation substantiation points. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 6 of 23, 3.2 Technical Governance Process Owner / The Chief Engineer The Technical Governance Process Owner is responsible for ownership of the ICP, TG Specifications, templates and associated process management documentation that enables achievement of the overall TG objectives. The Process Owner is also responsible for approving CTSs. 3.3 Discipline Chiefs (or equivalent) ‘The discipline/process Chief Engineer has approval responsibilities for all TG CTSs within their discipline/process to ensure the document is technically appropriate, aligned with the ICP, has adequate station agreement and conforms to the TG processes. ‘As document owners, the relevant disciplinelprocess Chief Engineers are responsible for the creation, upkeep (including prioritisation to manage fleet risk) and compliance oversight of the TG. documents within their discipline/process. They are also responsible for the identification of new and obsolete TG documents. The Discipline Chief Engineer is responsible for the appointment of a suitable author for each document in their discipline’s document list 3.4 Fleet Lead Non Destructive Testing The Fleet Lead is responsible for overseeing the authoring, the appointment and chairing of a Working Group (where required), verification and approval of all TG documents in line with the Technical Governance Document Production and Approval Specification ‘The Fleet Lead has responsibilty for ensuring that Suitably Qualified and Experienced (SQEP) or Adequate Trained and Experienced (ATE) resources have authored and verified the document, ‘where these roles exist for the work. The document shall be verified, as required by the Document Control ICP (Reference 4). ‘The Fleet Lead is responsible for ensuring that a document specification and implementation plan are written and agreed with the document's Working Group during production, defining compliance requirements and recording compliance across the fleet. 3.8 Station Director ‘The Station Director (SD) has responsibilty for ensuring compliance with this document at Station level and for recording compliance with, and dispensation from, the requirements of the documentation, ‘The SD is also responsible for the distribution of new TG documents on station (normally amongst the Station Engineers) and the delegation of management of any mandatory requirements that documents impose. 3.6 Stat 1g Manager (or delegate) The Station Engineering Manager is responsible for ensuring awareness, dissemination and familiarisation of applicable station staff with this document. ‘The Station Engineering Manager is also responsible for station implementation of TG documents (on behalf of the Station Director, as well as maintaining appropriate records of compliance (or dispensation) for the document. Station Engineering Managers are responsible for appointing a Station Point of Contact (SPOC) to oversee station engagement with the TG process. n Enginee 4 PRACTICE Section 4.1 below describes the NDT quality controls to be applied and Section 4.2 describes how these controls are to be achieved, Appendix A provides a flow chart to ald and guide the document end user through the process of CTS 210 and achieving compliance. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 44 444 Revision 003 Page 7 of 23, Controls to be applied to NDT activities Controls applied to NDT depend on the QA Grade of the work (see Section 4.1.2) and are ‘summarised in Tables 1 and 2. The choice of Table 1 or 2 depends on the reason for the work, as follows: (a) For NDT of existing plant, including NDT of repairs, the control mechanisms are summarised in Table 1 Mandatory Requirement No.1: Ensure control mechanisms, as summarised in Table 1 of CTS 210, are in place and cover the following: + NDT procedures and technique sheets (preparat in and approval; + Inspection; ‘* Verification of inspection results; ‘+ Repeat inspection or witnessing (audit); (b) For new or replacement bespoke items of plant the control mechanisms for manufacturing inspections are summarised in Table 2. Mandatory Requirement No.2: For new or replacement bespoke items of plant the control mechanisms for manufacturing inspections are summarised in Table 2 of CTS 210 and cover the following: ‘+ NDT procedures and technique sheets (preparation and approval; + Inspection (to approved NDT procedures and techniques); ‘+ Witnessing to confirm quality of inspection; + Compliance assessment. (©) For new ‘off-the-shelf items of plant that have a certificate of compliance with the appropriate code (for example, ASME or British, European or International Standard), no further controls are required apart from checking the validity of the certificate of compliance. The customer reserves the right to demand all or part of the control mechanisms of Table 1 or 2 in critical cases or where a valid certificate of compliance is not provided, Mandatory Requirement No.3: Check the validity of the Certificate of Compliance for new ‘off the shelf items of plant against appropriate code (for example ASME, or British, European or International Standard). No further controls are required. The customer reserves the right to demand all or part of the control mechanisms of table 1 of 2 of CTS 210, in critical cases or where a valid certificate of compliance is not provided. (4) Where new or replacement plant items are subject to a pre-service inspection after installation (providing a benchmark for later ‘in-service’ inspections), then the control mechanisms of Table 1 shall apply to the ‘pre-service’ inspection Mandatory Requirement No.4: Ensure the control mechanisms of Table 1 of CTS 210 are applied to the ‘pre-service’ inspection where new or replacement plant items are subject to a ‘pre-service’ inspection after installation (providing a benchmark for later ‘in-service’ inspection). Specification of NDT AIlNDT carried out on EDF Energy plant must be specified. For operational plant the specification shall be prepared by the nominated Station Engineer using the Work Management System. For new plant the specification shall be included in the contract documentation. The specification shall include as a minimum the following ‘+ Reason for the inspection of the component. + Details of the component to be tested. + QAClass of the component and QA grade of the inspection, ‘+ NDT method to be used for the inspection + Acceptance standard to be used for the inspection. ‘+ Ownership of the inspection report(s) NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 413 4142 Revision 003 Page 8 of 23, For QA Grade 1 to 3 NDT work carried out as part of manufacture, maintenance or repair of EDF Energy plant, the specification shall include a requirement as part of the NDT activity to report against a specified acceptance standard. The acceptance standard shall be agreed between the supplier and customer and shall comply with British, European, Intemational or EDF Energy standards as appropriate. For ‘in-service’ inspections, the extent of assessment and reporting to be included in the NDT activity will be specified in the Inspection Procedure or related documents Determination of QA Grade ‘The QA Grade shall be defined by the customer in accordance with Reference 8 "Graded Application” and will depend on the Class of the component and the role of the NDT in assuring integrity. If no QA Grade is specified, then the QA Grade shall default to the Plant Class of the ‘component or one grade lower. Tables 1 and 2 define the NDT controls required as a function of QA Grade for the various types of NDT. Procedures (a) New Procedures New NDT procedures shall comply with BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPECIO38, Appendix B (Reference 10). For plant items where EDF Energy Standard NDT Procedures exist, these procedures shall be used where reasonably practicable; Table 3 lists the current list of EDF Energy Standard NDT Procedures available. Note: Certain EDF Energy Standard NDT Procedures require a supplementary technique sheet which defines the actual inspection requirements for the NDT activity. All additional technique sheets shall comply with Reference 10. (b) Updates to Procedures Updates to existing NDT procedures shall also comply with BEG/SPEC/ENGIPSPEC/038, Appendix B (Reference 10). In addition, all changes to existing procedures shall be checked to ensure that there is no detrimental effect to any Safety Cases supported by the inspection. Particular areas to note are capablties of the inspection for defect detection or sizing, reporting criteria or reporting route. Confirmation that these checks have been carried out for all updated procedures is dealt with on a ‘case by case’ basis with the station ‘branch / group / section informed of the relevant change(s) accordingly. ‘The personnel requirements for preparation and approval of procedures depend on QA Grade according to Tables 1 and 2. Qualification of PersonnelGeneral NDT Certification Personnel carrying out NDT shall be qualified in accordance with BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/O038, ‘Appendix A (Reference 11). Personnel carrying out documentation review, witness, surveillance, verification or audit of NDT activities shall be qualified in accordance with BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/038, Appendix C (Reference 12) Visual Inspection Formal Qualification of personnel is dependent on the application, but as a minimum the technician undertaking the visual examination shall have had an eyesight test within the last twelve months. Any optical aids such as spectacles or corrective lenses that are necessary to the individual shall be worn when undertaking the examinations, Any additional qualification will be specified in the inspection procedure, NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 9 of 23, 4.1.4.3 NDT Level 1 Certification In certain instances where station knowledge andior working conditions prevail, NDT Level 1 qualified staff will be authorised by the EDF Energy Inspection Group Head or their nominee to carry out specific documented NDT activities. The EDF Energy NDT Level 1 certification scheme is carried out in accordance with the requirements of Branch Instruction E/PROC/ENG/BI/015 (Reference 13). The examination principles specified in this CTS are based on the requirements of BEGISPEC/ENG/PSPEC/038, Appendix A (Reference 11) 4.1.5 Reporting of NDT Results NDT inspection results shall be recorded using a format agreed between the customer and the supplier and shall clearly define the full scope of the work carried out and the inspection records required to be retained. Records may be defined as calculations, radiographs, or digital data, all of Which shall be uniquely identified and referenced in the inspection report. ‘The inspection report shall include all the technical information and where appropriate include a sketch of the component. All inspection reports shall be submitted in a timely manner to the customer. Where appropriate, the customer shall specify in advance the timescales for reporting, 4.1.6 Repeat Inspection/Witnessing Tables 1 and 2 define the requirements for repeat inspection or witnessing to be carried out depending on QA Grade and reason for the inspection. For NDT controlled by Table 1, witnessing is only to be carried out in the place of repeat inspection when the working conditions or high dose areas (ALARP) do not permit repeat inspection. 41.7 Compliance Assessment For NDT activities assigned QA Grade 1 or 2, a documented assessment shall be carried out to check that the controls specified in Sections 4.1.1 to 4.1.6 are properly implemented. Where checks reveal any non-conformances, these shall be handled through appropriate QA system procedures. 4.1.8 Assessment of Inspection Results The end result of the NDT Activity is the inspection report delivered to the customer. The customer is responsible for the timely assessment of the inspection results. Where necessary, the customer may request an assessment from Structural Integrity Branch and this will be carried out in accordance with Branch Instruction €/PROC/ENGIBI/086 (Reference 14). In such cases it may be appropriate for the inspection results to be delivered to the customer with a covering assessment sheet 4.1.9 Storage of Inspection Reports Inspection reports and records identified within the report have been identified as "Permanent Records” and shall be stored in accordance with Reference 7 “Records Management’. Where NDT digital data from automated and manual inspections has been identified as a record in the report, then this information shall be stored at Barnwood in accordance with the Branch Instruction E/PROCIENGBI009 (Reference 15) on behalf of the Station 4.2 Implementation of NDT Controls 4.2.1. Selection of NDT Suppliers Only NDT suppliers meeting the requirements of Reference 11 shall be used. 4.2.2 NDT cartied out as or part of Contracts Requirements for placing contracts are summarised in the Acquire Goods and Services Standard (Reference 16) which refers to the Acquire Process NGL Model Form of Enquiry Document (Reference 17) for guidance. Section 8.2.1 of the document provides guidelines for the production of a Contract Enquiry Technical Specification. This states that specific non-destructive examination requirements and acceptance criteria shall be specified, where appropriate, and references this document for further guidance. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 10 of 23, Tenderers shall be provided with copies of the most recent issues of References 10, 11 and 12 and the Standard NDT Procedures in Table 3; unless itis known that they already hold such copies. Table 1 or 2, as appropriate, shall be used to identify the NDT controls to be specified for a particular QA Grade in terms of procedure preparation, inspection, verification of inspection reports, repeat inspection, witnessing and audit of any NOT activity required to complete the contract. For new ‘off-the-shelf items requiring no further controls, the contract specification shall include a requirement to provide an acceptable Certificate of Compliance (C of C) 4.2.3. NDT cartied out as or part of Purchase Orders Whenever EDF Energy place a purchase order which includes a process of manufacture, maintenance or repair of EDF Energy plant of QA Grade 1 and 2 (and 3 if applicable) involving NDT, clauses covering quality systems for NDT shall be invoked from the Standard Enquiry Document described above (Reference 17) Table 1 or 2, as appropriate, shall be used to identify the NDT controls to be specified for a particular QA Grade in terms of procedure preparation, inspection, verification of inspection reports, repeat inspection, witnessing and audit of any NDT activity required to complete the purchase order. For new ‘off-the-shelf items requiring no further controls, the purchase specification shall include a requirement to provide an acceptable certificate of compliance. Copies of the most recent issues of References 10, 111 and 12, and the Standard NDT Procedures in Table 2 will be provided as appropriate. 4.2.4 Inspection carried out by EDF Energy staff Where Central Technical Organisation (CTO) Inspection Group staff or other staff under their direct control carry out NDT work on behalf of EDF Energy Stations it is the responsibility of the Structural Integrity Branch Manager to ensure that the controls defined in Section 4.1 are implemented. Where other EDF Energy staff undertake NDT work, itis the responsibilty of the Station Director to ensure that the controls defined in Section 4.1 are implemented. 4.2.5 Audit of NDT Suppliers In order to monitor the quality arrangements of NDT suppliers, the Structural Integrity Branch Manager implements a programme of quality audits of suppliers carrying out NDT on EDF Energy plant. 4.3 Compliance / Non-compliance ‘The “Company Specification for Technical Governance Documentation Implementation and Compliance’ (Reference 2) states how compliances and dispensations (if necessary) are reported and managed. This CTS must be managed in accordance with that part of the TG process. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 5 DEFINITIONS Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) NOT Procedure NDT Technique NDT Inspection Repeat Inspection Compliance Assessment Surveillance Witnessing Documentation Review Verification of Inspection Reports Levels of Competence Bespoke Items Off the Shelf items NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 11 of 23, A procedure that covers the inspection andfor testing of any material, component or assembly by means that do not affect its ultimate serviceability. ‘An orderly sequence of rules which describe in general terms where, how and when an NDT method should be applied to a product or component. ‘A written document detailing the precise steps to be followed in testing a specific component in accordance with an NDT procedure, NDT Examination to verify whether an item of plant or component conforms to specified requirements. ‘The steps necessary to obtain evidence that the NDT is being or has been performed and reported in accordance with the relevant procedures, work instructions, standards and specifications, and that the reported results are accurate. Repeat Inspection will normally take the form of. (2) Checking the work by sample re-inspection; or (b) Independent analysis of data. ‘A systematic review carried out to determine whether NDT activities and related inspection records comply with the requirements of the contract, purchase order or this CTS. The continuing monitoring and verification of the status of procedures, inspections and analysis of records. Overseeing the actual person performing the inspection to verify the results, ‘Taking the necessary steps to provide evidence that the procedures, work instructions, standards, specifications and personnel certification meet the requirements of the contract or purchase order. Taking the necessary steps to provide evidence that the NDT procedures and personnel certification and inspection reports meet the requirements. of the contract or purchase order. NDT Operators shall be designated as having a competence grade at one of three Levels, Level 3 being the highest level of competence. This term refers to items designed and manufactured by an external supplier to meet an EDF energy specification. Inspection carried out during manufacture is the responsibilty of the supplier, subject to the controls in Table 2. This term refers to items made to a recognised code or standard and routinely supplied to EDF Energy (and usually more widely to industry).NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPECIENG/CTS/210 Revision 003 Page 12 of 23 6 REFERENCES 4. BEGIICP/ENG/SH/001 Integrated Company Practice for Technical Governance 2. BEGISPECIDAO/SH/002 Company Specification for Technical Governance Documentation Implementation and Compliance 3. BEG/SPEC/DAO/SHIO01 Company Specification for Technical Governance Document Production and Approval BEGIICP/DM/003, Integrated Company Practice for Documented Information 5. BEGIFORMIENGISH/002 Technical Governance Compliance Tracker 6. BEGISPEC/QUA021 Company Specification for Management System Audits — Fleet and Stations Not used BEGISPEC/FENG/001 Graded Application BEGISPEC/IENGIPSPEC/038 Controlling the Quality of Non Destructive Testing: Implementation of CTS 210 10. BEGISPEC/ENG/PSPECIO38_ Requirements for Procedures for Non-Destructive Testing ‘Appendix B 11. BEGISPECIENG/PSPEC/O38_ Requirements for Organisations carrying out Non- Appendix A Destructive Testing 12. BEGISPEC/ENG/PSPECIO38_ Requirements for Compliance Assessment of Non- ‘Appendix C Destructive Testing 43. E/PROC/ENG/BU015 NDT Training and Examination of Engineering Division or Station Personnel to Level 1 Standard 44, E/PROC/ENG/BU086 Management of Inspection and Assessment Activities, Undertaken by Structural Integrity Branch 45. E/PROC/ENG/BU/009 Maintenance of Inspection Group Magnetic Media Register 16. BEGISPEC/PRO/O11 ‘Acquire Goods and Services Standard 17. BEGISPECIPRO/O13 ‘Acquire Process NGL Model Form of Enquiry Document 7 RECORDS 7.1 Compliance and Dispensation Records Fully traceable records for compliances and dispensations must be kept to demonstrate that the requirements of this CTS have been met. This is done using the Technical Governance Compliance Tracker (Reference 5) The application of all mandatory requirements shall be audited in accordance with the specification for management system auditing (see Reference 6). Records associated with this document shall be controlled, stored and archived in accordance with the requirements of BEG/ICP/DM/003 (Reference 4) No. | Record | Template [Record NoJ] Requirement] Record | Record | Retention | Storage | _ Security Title | Novidentifer identitier or| for Record | Originator | Owner | Period” | Location | Classification Link to Record 01 [inspection Outage | Work Order Inspection [ Station z As | Net Protecively Report | Management. [Card (wc) roup Marked lbatabase (O¥D)] Number NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED TABLES. Table 1: BEG/SPECIENGICTS/210 Graded application of QA to in-service and pre-service NDT activities Revision 003 Page 13 of 23, ‘ACT, ‘CONTROLS TO BE APPLIED FOR GA GRADE? | GAGRADE2 | GAGRADES | GAGRADES Procoares and oeetniaue | Preparation By Level2 trom EOF Eneray or Approved Contractor apple), By Tomal eos iateaton roe) Tectnicl whore Teehncal usteaton Endorsement | requested by Responsible Engineer for Not required the plant ByLevel Sem | By Lavel3 fom EDF Energy or aather ecanisaion approved Technical Approval | EOF Energy ty EDF Energy. ‘Ruthorsaton for Use F Energy Inspection Group Head inspections (General) By Level 2 fom EOF Energy of fom anat ther organisation approved by EOF Eneray Station Specie Inspections: Where specie station knowledge and/or working congtions preva Not applicable EDF Energy qualified and authorised Level 1 staff with appropriate Level 2 supervsion approved by EOF Energy 100% scrutiny by Minimum of 5% scrutiny by Level 2 {tom EDF Energy or 100% scrutiny by Level 2 from EDF ergy ar another Vertesionctnspecton pots | eval fom OE aro | Se vereaton ‘ruentaton oer exganston approvedby Zor |, og=nsal Energy ‘approved by’ Crear Simm sed outer{ Covel tom 206 | Minimum of 5% by Level fom EOF Work carried out oF | Energy, or another | Energy or another organisation approved repeat ary supe | E™T 2 aot tes tana at vnteaion wnopecion. | “by eOF Energy General NDT ‘approved by EDF and Work na ay Timm 10% by Cave? Fan EO stperiged VES | Netappicale | energy arcrganaaten approved by EF | Sef verifcaton ener rey Wor cared ot oy 0 e0F erery seus: | b)Svpersedby | “The Staion andor the NOT Engineer Repeat visual | SSE Every | shal spocy tne oemarecn por Not opicale Inspection | work not cirectly | to the start of the inspection programme Supeisea oy 20 ener Wark cried oa | 100% vacation of ala by Level om dewey | EDF Crease ncher syeneton Repeat ‘supervised by EDF | approved by EDF Energy unless agreed Not applicable Inspection Ao | Ener with apecion Group Head Nor fork not dire sipenigesy 20° Not appicable ener Wwinessng TOR wines riytove | worccaried outor| ust 2 fom ened there |Warccarad or] PLE Energy er | Mn of 5% winessng by Level? eva afer | dey cupevned | “ana” | gam EDF Enryarancieogancaion | Nol apicabie inspetennar | SYEDE EE erganeaton ‘approved by EOF Enero eovale proved by EDF ate woting Cray canton or) | Wanna areaiy Tim o 70% winery Level? nigndose acs |sypewoctty 3° | Notappicabie | fomarure’ rganisaton proved ty | — Notapplcable (ALARP) Energy staff EDF Energy, crplaneAtseemagh | BYa0aR07 Tom EDF Every or arother cca Compl A " “organisation approved by EDF Energy Not required NOTE: Best practice is that the re-inspection percentages detailed in Table 1 be applied against each NDT discipline utlised, if ALARP. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 14 of 23, Table 2: Graded application of QA to manufacturing NDT of bespoke items of plant activity CONTROLS TO BE APPLIED FOR QAGRADE1 | QAGRADE2 | QAGRADE3 | QAGRADE4 NDT procedure and technique NOT Provider Level 2 or 3 sheet preparation NDT procedure and technique NDT Provider Level 3 sheet technical approval Confirmation that NDT EDF Energy or Level 2 or 3 NDT Provider Level 3 procedure and technique sheet authorised by EDF Energy is fit for purpose Inspection (fo approved NOT. NOT Provider Level 2 NOT Provider procedure and technique sheet) Level 2, or Level 1 with Level 2 supervision ‘Witnessing to confirm quatity of | 100% witness | Witness at 10% minimum unless | Not required inspection byLevel2 | agreed otherwise by Level 2 from ‘rom EDF EDF Energy or independent Energy or inspection agency personnel independent approved by EDF Energy inspection agency personnel approved by EDF Energy Compliance assessment By auditors from EDF Energy or Not required another organisation approved by EDF Energy NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 16 of 23, Table 3: EDF Energy standard NDT procedures Reference le E/PROCIENGIBI/004 NDT Procedure for the Location and Measurement of Flow Assisted Corrosion (FAC) on AGR'S E/PROCIENGIBI/110 NDT Procedure, Weld Location and Nomenclature E/PROCIENGIBI/111 NDT Procedure, Liquid Penetrant Inspection E/PROCIENGIBI/112, NDT Procedure, Magnetic Particle Inspection E/PROCIENGIBI/113 NDT Procedure, Radiographic Inspection of Welds E/PROCIENGIBI/114 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement E/PROCIENGIBI/115 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of Welds in Ferritic Components. E/PROCIENGIBI/116 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of AGR Small Bore Branch Connections for the Detection of Thermal Fatigue Cracking E/PROCIENGIBI/117 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of Threaded Fasteners E/PROCIENGIBI/118 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of Welds in Austenitic Components E/PROCIENGIBI/119, NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of AusteniticiFerrtic Transition Butt Welds E/PROCIENGIBI/120 NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of Graded Transition (Jessop- Saville) Joints E/PROCIENGIBI/121 NDT Procedure, Manual Ultrasonic Inspection of AGR Gas Circulator End Rings E/PROCIENGIBI/122 NDT Procedure, Inspection of White Metal Bearings and Thrust Pads E/PROCIENGIBI/123, NOT Procedure, Eddy Current Inspection of Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Components and Welds E/PROCIENGIBI/155 NDT Procedure for Ultrasonic Inspection of Ferric and Austenitic Forgings E/PROCIENGIBI/222. Remote Operations Generic Remote Visual Inspection Procedure E/PROCIENGIBI/225 NDT Procedure for the In-Service Eddy Current Inspection of Non- Ferrous Heat Exchanger Tubing E/PROCIENGIBI/234 NDT Procedure for Corrosion and General Integrity Surveys using Computed Radiography E/PROCIENGIBI/238 NDT Procedure, Location and Measurement of Corrosion Using Ultrasonic Phased Array E/PROCIENG/BI/1443 | NDT Procedure, Ultrasonic Inspection of Ferrtic Butt Welds, 3mm to 412mm Thickness Note: Index of EDF Energy NDT Procedures will not be maintained. Current index is available from the CTO, Structural Integrity Branch Inspection Group. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 16 of 23, APPENDIX A: CTS 210 APPLICATION FLOW CHART Tem ~ 1 Ci * YES ere Le cotora ye a9 ‘tare sone hepatica) | > [Rewmsuppierer ea ve Ls == Lio | Saeeres 1) re _.__f fre 4 . | =e | [ Were rairapesionwnes | “Aiwige spopraier= —_)_NO ‘esremectenmires® |__| nspetannens bp 3 Eneay or at ea Pay ‘hrlanee ves me Tea conplaree assert | rei 09 2 gra? ~ (CTS210 compliance = achieved no = Temgige ment | 60 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED APPENDIX B: DOCUMENT WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Not Provided Jason Ellison Steven Walker Nick Sams Tim Butler Not Provided Roy Blyde Andrew Wilkens Alastair Miller Paul Nicholson NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED NA Components & Programs Engineer System Health Engineer Group Head Steam & Rotating Plant Lead Mechanical Engineer NA ‘System Engineer Programme Engineer System Health Engineer Pre-Service & In-Service Inspection Lead BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 17 of 23, Dungeness B Hartlepool Heysham A Heysham B Hinkley Point B Hunterston B Sizewell B Sizewell B Tomess Hinkley Point CNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 Revision 003 Page 18 of 23, APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TEMPLATE Document Information Implementation Plan Overall Owner. Document tite Controlling the Quality of Non Destructive Testing BEG/SPEC/ENGI/CTS/210 and its implementation document BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/O38 Document reference number: Fleet Lead / Discipline Chief: D. Chapman / A. Khan Document author: P. Heath Doe. Production Working Group: [CTS 210 Working Group ‘Superseded document BEGISPECIENGICTS/210, Revision 001 Stations affected by document [All Priority within TG Programme: [Low Business Impact on Station Each station Engineering Manager and Project Manager is responsible for overall ownership of this implementation plan. Itis anticipated that this document will have a Minor impact as the requirements detailed are already in place. Non Destructive Testing inspection tasks carried out at EDF Energy sites or on behalf of EDF Energy as part of a project or contract instruction should already reference this CTS for adherence to the requirements to ensure the Quality of Non Destructive Testing is achieved Itis a revision of an existing document. The boxes below state the responsible person and anticipated resource requirements for the implementation of the required activities, as agreed by the document working group. Impact estimate Required activities ‘Owner Internal! External! Man-days £k ‘Gap Analysis 2 Implement compliance activities (e.g. update Station [Dependent on Gap analysis, procedures, carry plant mods). Engineering |recommendation is CTS requirement Manager/ |to be reviewed whenever a new Project |project or contract instruction is Manager _| placed. Fieat self-assessment I improvements from Document Description | Estimated Equipment Improvement / Risk. Management of this process will provide a significant Reduction contribution towards achieving and_ maintaining statutory and corporate compliance with Safety, Health and Environmental policies and associated legislation during all phases of a component life cycle. Staff Awareness Which of the following method of notification will be used to make staff aware of the documents release? E-mail No [Team brie? Yes Meeting (Station PHC) ‘No ~[Document Bie Yes Workshop ‘No—lintranet announcement (SSH) No | Record Updates The following records relating to BEGISPEC/ENGICTSI210 will need to be checked and updated as necessary ‘Associated document references Not Applicable [Intemeviniranet Links Not Applicable ] NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDCBYUV ATSALLOBLONd LON ‘Arewung, jst Suu / eroveUIOD WUeOYIUBIS JO} UONeBRIN + ueweunbos sojemBoy / uoNpueg eoueer| + “souetidioo uonesi6e1 © jst sway / [eloseuwiog ueOYBIS 40) UONEBNIN + uewssnbas J0}emB2y / UoNpUED eoueDr] + “souetjdioo onesie] ° sty sway / [eioseuuwiog WueoyUBIS 19) uONeBIN « uewssnbas J0}emB2y / UoNpUED eoueDr] + “eouetjdiuoo uoneysi6e7 + youoo yooup siey sepun yey jst sway / eroseuutog UBOYIUBIS 10} UORBENIN + swawounbas J0}2IN6y / uoMHpUED eoueOT] + ‘2queyiduioo uopeysiGay + Joyjo 40 yes ABs0U3 403 ‘Aq yno pauieo suoqsedsut pue siepio aseyoing 'sJpeAUOD yauIND 10 maUL Jo ved J0 se no powes 8q 0} poypods si LGN JOnsUByN PaneIyDe 9q OF S| quawiaunba: Aojepuew ey 0} eauetdwog (suoyoedsut eovvas-ul, 49}2| Jo} yeuyoued e Buiprrcid) Uone|e\sul Jaye Uonsedsul sones-ald, @ o} joalqns axe sway) queld yusW20edos Jo mou soy uoyedsur somIes-o1d, ay) 0} paydde fale 012 $19 Jo | alge Jo sWIsUAyDEU jomucO ayy auNsuS opinoid jou si aoueydwo Jo oyeoyH00 pyeA e as0UR 40 soseo JBONL9 U 942 SLO JO Z J0 | sige], Jo SwsIueyoOW Joucs ay) 4o wed Jo ye puewep o} 14Gu oy) samosas yawoysno ay]. “pases ave sjoqueo sayy oN “(plepuEis | © Feuopeweyyj 10 uesdosn3 ‘yshug 30 JWSV ‘e/dWeXe 49}) apo sjeudoidde ou} ysulebe yUeId Jo suloy! sjoys-o4) “Yo, mau Jo} aoueydus09 Jo a}eoy"100 4) 40 AypHER a4 4094 juewssasse soueydwog ~ ‘uoredsutjo Ayyenb wiyuoo 0} Buissauim, \senb1uyooy pue seinpacoid aN paroidde 0}) uowpadsu) + iyenoudde z ue uoneiedaid) sjeoys enbiuypsy pue seinpesoid LON « ‘BuMoyO) auf JanCD puE LZ S19 JO Z aIgeL UL pesuewuns aie suofoedsul Buunjoejnuew 16) swSIUEYOoUL Jomuca ayy queld Jo sway! axodseq yuawaoe|das 10 mou 104 7uauissasse soueydw0D ‘(pny Bursseuym 10 uoqoedsu! yeadoy 'syodes uojpadsut jo uoneayon ‘uowpadsu| ‘enoudde ue uoneredaid) sjeoys enbiuypay pue seinpesoid ON « !Buynoyo} ou} son09 pue ooeid ul ove “OZ S19 J0 | a1ge ul pasuewiuns se ‘swsiueyseU jouoo uy eunsu3 uonesynsne jusweuinbey edu, ssoujsng ‘opRosaUll| | OUMO WORD ‘eujeping | pesedoid suoney Pesodoid ‘sejeg quewounbey Aioyepuew, ON £710 61 oBed £00 uoisinegy OLZ/SLO/ON3/03dS/938 ‘SoTEDSOUIT] PUE SUORSY VONEITEUIETaUT paysSB_NS GUVIN ATSALOBLOUd LONNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEGISPEC/ENGICTSI210 Revision 003 Page 20 of 23, APPENDIX D: COMPANY TECHNICAL STANDARD DOCUMENT SPECIFICATION Document Speci tion for Company Technical Standards Document title: Controlling the Quality of Non Destructive Testing, Document reference: BEG/SPEC/ENGICTS/210 and its implementation document BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPECI038, Document type: Company Technical Standard (CTS) Mandatory Requirements Justification: ‘All mandatory requirements should be suitably justified in accordance with the requirements set down in section 1.1 of the CTS template Mandatory requirements may be derived from: + Nuclear and Environmental Safety Significance + Legislation compliance. + Licence Condition / Regulator requirement. ‘+ Mitigation for Significant Commercial / Lifetime Risk. ParentiChild BERL Risk: | None. Technical Policy: None applicable, NewiRevision Document: BEG/SPECIENG/CTS/210 Rev. 002 Revision of existing CTS 210 BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/038 Rev. 002 - Update and revision of supporting implementation document BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/038. Document impact: Minor. Responsible Group: Inspection Group, Structural Integrity Branch. Task Fil E/TSKIGEN/13291, Folder 69, Task Engin: Philip Heath Key Responsit ‘Complete this Document Specification, Update Dac Spec to include Working Group comments, Produce the TG document. Draft Generic implementation plan Address Verification/Fleet Lead/Working Group comments. Fleet Lead Engineer: Darren Chapman Key Responsibi * Ensure adequate SQEP resources to author and verify the document, * Ensure this Document Spec is accurate and in line with the document requirements, * Distribute Specification to the Working Group. + Distribute TG document and draft Generic Implementation plan to the Working Group. * Co-ordinate and chair the Working Group. © Mediate conflicting comments on the document content and escalate to the Chief Discipline Engineer, as appropriate. ‘+ Approve the document in Passport on behalf of the Working Group. Working Group Member: (Review of Spec / Implementation Plan) Refer to Distribution List for Working Group Members, Planned Issue Date: March 2019. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEGISPEC/ENGICTSI210 Revision 003 Page 21 of 23, Background: This Standard ensures that all NDT carried out on all EDF Energy plant is fitfor purpose The document originates from the CEGB Production, Inspection and Testing Board (1980's) and has been in use in its various revisions as ‘a mandatory controlicompliance since then. The current Standard is supported by an implementation document, BEG/SPECIEBG/PSPEC/038, which also has CEGB origins. ‘Scope of document / proposed content: The Specification details requirements for NDT procedures (preparation, technical endorsement, approval and authorisation) qualification’ of inspectors; NDT reports and verification of results; repeat inspection and witnessing; compliance assessment. The controls cover. + In-service and pre-service NDT of plant components (repeated inspection) + New or replacement bespoke items of plant (one off inspection), + New “off-the-shelf” items (certficate of conformity). Expected / Proposed Mandatory Requirements: + The Specification describes the control mechanisms to be applied to NDT on all EDF Energy plant at all stages in its life-cycle. + The Specification requirements apply to NDT carried out by Contractors or EDF Energy staft. + These control mechanisms shall be invoked in all contracts or purchase orders involving NDT services or NDT as part of a process of manufacture, maintenance or repair of EDF Energy plant. Exclusions: Not Applicable. Document Specific References: Refer to Section 6. Relevant Good Document Examples: None. Prerequisites: For producing and revising documents the Task Engineer shall have read and become familiar with BEG/ICP/ENG/SHIO01 (Technical Governance) and BEG/SPECIDAO/SH/001 (Technical Governance Documentation Production and Approval) and BEG/ICP/DM/003 (Document Control) Process: Documents shall be produced and revised following the procedures set down in BEG/ICP/ENG/SH/001, BEG/SPEC/DAO/SH/001 and BEG/ICP/DIM/003. All documents shall be produced using the approved Technical Governance document templates, referenced within the process specification, Implementation Plan: ‘A Generic Implementation Plan will be produced in parallel with the CTS. The Generic Implementation Plan will be produced by the author for approval by the appointed Working Group. Chief Engineer: ‘Additional information: None. ‘Agreed with Working Yes. Group: ‘Agreed with Discipline Yes Records of agreement should be stored in the document task file. NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED BEGISPEC/ENGICTSI210 Revision 003 Page 22 of 23, APPENDIX E: EXTERNAL DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS SUPPORTED BY THIS CTS Statutory Instruments identify when NDT is required to be undertaken to ensure compliance with the relevant statutory and regulatory requirements. NDT is an important nuclear and personnel safety consideration throughout a component life cycle. ‘As such reference to the code or standard that is applicable for the component or item of plant under test should be made to ensure the requirement for NDT, if applicable, has been addressed and therefore meets the requirements of this CTS and its implementation document BEG/SPEC/ENG/PSPEC/O38, NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKEDNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED DISTRIBUTION LIST Role Technical Governance Project Team Discipline Chief Engineer TG Station Point of Contact — Hunterston B TG Station Point of Contact — Hinkley Point B TG Station Point of Contact — Hinkley Point B TG Station Point of Contact — Dungeness B TG Station Point of Contact — Hartlepool TG Station Point of Contact — Heysham 1 TG Station Point of Contact — Heysham 1 TG Station Point of Contact — Heysham 2 TG Station Point of Contact — Tomess TG Station Point of Contact — Sizewell B TG Station Point of Contact — Sizewell B Working Group Member — Hunterston B. Working Group Member ~ Hinkley Point B Working Group Member ~ Dungeness B Working Group Member ~ Hartlepool Working Group Member — Heysham 1 Working Group Member — Heysham 2 Working Group Member ~ Torness Working Group Member ~ Sizewell B Working Group Member ~ Sizewell B Working Group Member — Hinkley Point C Engineering Manager — Hunterston B Engineering Manager — Hinkley Point B Engineering Manager ~ Dungeness B Engineering Manager — Hartlepool Engineering Manager - Heysham 1 Engineering Manager - Heysham 2 Engineering Manager - Tomess Engineering Manager — Sizewell B Chief Mechanical Engineer Mechanical Fleet Lead Mechanical Rotating Plant Fleet Lead Mechanical Pressure Systems Fleet Lead Mechanical Boilers Fleet Lead Fuel Route Chief Engineer Fuel Route Manager ~ Hunterston B Fuel Route Manager ~ Hinkley Point B Fuel Route Manager — Dungeness B Fuel Route Manager ~ Hartlepool Fuel Route Manager — Heysham 1 Fuel Route Manager ~ Heysham 2 Fuel Route Manager ~ Torness Fuel Route Group Head — Sizewell B Fleet Quality Engineer Quality Assurance Manager NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Name ‘Ajaz Khan Louise Morran Katherine Jones Denise Dyte Andrew Renfrew Richard Wames Leo Darrell lan Hutton Trevor Bollenhagen Ron Harris Graham Palser Rebecca O'Brien Not Provided Tim Butler Not Provided Jason Ellison ‘Stephen Walker Nick Sams Alastair Miller Roy Blyde Andrew Wilkins Paul Nicholson Andrew Dalling Dave Overy Timothy Yemm Richard Howarth Gail Brannick lan Haines David G Howie ‘Sean Verrall John Hart Jonathan Ellis ‘Sid McFarland Jonathan Ellis Paul Jackson Paul Richards Ross Alcock Mark Paling David Blackman Carl Pankhurst Austin Galley Keith Thomas ‘Angus Finnie Gavin Rousseau Peter Molloy Mohallee! Mohammed BEGISPEC/ENGICTSI210 Revision 003 Page 23 of 23, User ID / Alert Group cD0-Tevo40 EDMAKOt Huo3648 ED01602 HPBO348, YYINS40 LLPASOS HEY0417 DDABE1I Hu00041 7001179 BBBAB72 BBFAJ20 NA KKEAAS3 NA LLPASIC HEY0372 OOEZM25 TO01295 BBBAJ24 BBDAP18 Looae23 Hu03165 YYMCHS7 YYTPY01 LLPAStI ‘OOBPBO2 BBBAL96 PK00278 BBBAB11 EDJAHO1 PKo0S64 7001883 PKo0S64 £D00341 OOEPTO3 Huo0059 KKAPP17 YYDXBO1 LLPASJI DDPHF14 DDPMRO3 To00079 BBBADS8 000917 ‘AA01537