Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*Ortthophony specialty
2023/2024
Interoduction:
The study aimed to know the nature of receptive language, its
characteristics, and the extent of the impact of its presence on a
sample of autistic children integrated into clinics and special
centers, where specialists had an effective role in improving the
language for children who underwent artiophonic sponsorship,
after applying both the PIP and CARS tests, which were chosen.
The sample was purposive and consisted of children of male
gender whose ages ranged between 8 and 14 years. In this study,
we relied on the descriptive approach, observation, and interviews
with the sample.
Pervious studies :
Difintion :
Abbreviations: ADI:
Autism Diagnostic Interview; ADOS: Autism Diagnostic
Observation Schedule: MLD: moderate learning disabilities; PH:
physical handicaps: PPVT: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test;
SEF-1: Socio-Emotional Functioning Interview.
Results:
Autistic-like Repetitive and Stereotyped Behaviour
Information on variety of stereotyped behaviour patterns
was obtained from the ADI (data obtained on 18
individuals in the Autism group and 20 in the Language
group. see Fig. As predicted, informant reports indicated
that the Autism group showed significantly more problems
in many areas, including compulsions. verbal rituals,
unusual sensory interests, hand and finger mannerisms,
stereotyped movements, and oddity of gait. They were
also more likely to have problems related to resistance to
change and unusual preoccupations, al- though
significance levels here reached only p<.05. On the
composite measure of Autistic-type behaviours, 3
individuals (17%) in the Autism group were rated as
showing "severe disturbance", 10 (56%) as having
"moderate", and 5 (28%) as "no/minimal" problems. None
of the Language group had severe problems, 7 (35%)
were rated as having "moderate", and 13 (65%)
The third previous study :
Website:google scolar
Definitions:
Language Expressive: both a standardized measure of receptive
language ability and a standardized measure of expressive ability
was administered to the participants, where receptive language
ability was operationally defined as spoken language
comprehension, and expressive language ability as spoken
language production
Autism spectrum disorder :
Clinical anecdotes suggest that children with autism spectrum
disorder (ASD) often show an atypical language profile in which
expressive language exceeds receptive language competency.
Research tools:
Search strategy, inclusion criteria, and coding system Two online
databases, Scopus and Proquest, were searched using different
combinations of the following search keywords: Autis", Asperger",
language, expressive, receptive, production, comprehension,
Preschool Language Scales, PLS, Expressive Vocabulary Test,
EVT, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, PPVT, Clinical Evaluation
of Language Fundamentals, CELF, Mullen Scales of Early
Learning, MSEL, Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales, VABS,
and Vineland. Two journals in the field, The Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders and Research in Autism Spectrum
Disorders, were hand-searched. Five articles were included from
the hand searches that did not appear in the database search.
Results :
Although relatively few studies have directly examined the
question of whether children with ASD have a greater likelihood of
presenting with stronger expressive than receptive language
skills, there is a much larger body of literature in which receptive
and expressive language measures have been administered to
children and adolescents with ASD in the course of examining
other research questions, that is, where estimating receptive-
expressive language gaps was not the direct aim of the study.
These studies do not report receptive-expressive discrepancies
on an individual basis, and therefore do not offer the ability to tally
the proportion of participants with gaps in each direction across
these studies. However, if an expressive-greater-than-receptive
gap is indeed a common profile in the ASD population, then we
would expect to find group mean scores on expressive language
measures that are larger than those on receptive measures for
groups with ASD 1. Receptive and expressive language abilities
of individuals with ASD compared to their peers with TD The
random effects model demonstrated a large, negative Grand SMD
in receptive (g-1.52 SD, p<0.001) (see Fig. 1), and expressive
(g=-1.56 SD, p<0.001) (see Fig. 3) language ability scores
between children and youth with ASD and their peers with TD
(see Table 2). This suggests that many individuals with ASD have
significant deficits in both receptive and expressive language
ability. Additionally, the distributions of SMDs for receptive and
expressive language ability were highly variable (see Table 3).
These prediction intervals tell us that the mean receptive or
expressive language score for any given sample of children and
adolescents with ASD will vary between Profoundly Impaired
compared to typically developing controls at one extreme and
within the Average range at the other extreme. It also suggests
that other factors beyond a diagnosis of ASD are influencing their
language skills. 2. Differences in the receptive and expressive
language skills of individuals with ASD This indicates that some
children and youth with ASD are somewhat more impaired in their
expressive language ability, while others are somewhat more
impaired in their receptive language ability, but these differences
are not large (i.e., less than one SD).
Comment on previous studies :