You are on page 1of 3

NIGERIAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

AVIATION HOUSE
P. M. B. 21029, 21038, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria

CL: O-OPS 005A TRAINING PROGRAMME INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Date Operator

Base Inspection Conducted by

CHECK DETERMINE THE NEED FOR THE INSPECTION/SURVEILLANCE


CHECK PLAN AND INITIATE THE INSPECTION
CHECK REVIEW OPERATOR'S OFFICE FILE
CHECK REVIEW OPERATOR'S TRAINING MANUAL
CHECK NOTIFY OPERATOR OF THE TRAINING PROGRAMME INSPECTION
CHECK CONDUCT THE OPERATOR INBRIEFING
CHECK CONDUCT THE INSPECTION
CHECK

INSPECT THE OPERATOR'S TRAINING ORGANISATION


CHECK

INSPECT OPERATOR'S TRAINING DOCUMENTS


CHECK

IDENTIFY THE TRAINING PROGRAMME


CHECK

IDENTIFY THE TRAINING MATERIALS


CHECK

IDENTIFY TRAINING CURRICULUM CONTENT


CHECK

OBSERVE AND EVALUATE THE OPERATOR'S TRAINING


PROGRAMME
CHECK

EVALUATE FLIGHT CREW TRAINING


CHECK

INITIAL FLIGHT TRAINING

CL: O-OPS005A 005A- 1 26 TH APR


R IL 2010
TRAINING PROGRAMME INSPECTION CHECKLIST

CHECK BASIC INDOCTRINATION


CHECK INITIAL EMERGENCY DRILL TRAINING
CHECK EVALUATE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR TRAINING
CHECK EVALUATE CHECK PILOT TRAINING
CHECK EVALUATE COURSEWARE
CHECK EVALUATE INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY METHODS
CHECK EVALUATE TRAINING AIDS AND EQUIPMENT
CHECK EVALUATE FLIGHT SIMULATOR OR TRAINING DEVICE
CHECK EVALUATE TESTING AND CHECKING METHODS
CHECK INSPECT TRAINING RECORDS

To be filled out after inspection is complete:

CHECK DETERMINE THE RESULTS OF THE INSPECTION


CHECK DEBRIEF THE OPERATOR
CHECK DOCUMENT THE INSPECTION
CHECK SCHEDULE FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES
CHECK FILE INSPECTION RESULTS IN OFFICE

CL: O-OPS005A 005A- 2 26TH APIR IL 2010


ORDER /CL No: Tracking No.:
Notes: 1. A “NO” or “N/S” response on a checklist must be accompanied by reason or comments.
2. A “NO” response to a safety issue finding in an inspection of an organization must be
transferred to a CF report for corrective action where applicable.
3. Precede all comments with the applicable checklist item number or discrepancy number.
Discrepancy Label: (Circle the applicable numeric labels that best describe the discrepancies)
Policy, Procedures, Instructions, Information, Documentation, Controls: Document Quality
1.Not Specified 2.Unclear Do not comply with: 7.Do not Identify: Who, 8.Unreadable
3.Incomplete 4.Inconsistent 5. CAR 6.Guidance What, When, Where, 9.Illegible
How
10. Resource requirements incomplete (personnel, facilities, equipment, technical data)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:

Recommendations

Name of Inspector Signature Date

CL: O-OPS005A 005A- 3 26TH APR IL 2010

You might also like